Post on 02-Jun-2018
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
1/48
Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
Palapan Kampan and Adam Richard Tanielian
Abstract: The Fukushim-Daiichi disaster marked a turning point in nuclear power. Following
the tragedy, public approal !or nuclear energy waned in spite o! its strong sa!ety record. This
article takes a critical iew o! opposition to nuclear power and outdated regulatory regimes.
Recommendations include reision o! nuclear insurance pool systems. A globali"ed
regulatory and !inancial protection enironment is proposed whereby public and priate
entities cooperate to ensure sa!ety and security. Reprocessing o! spent nuclear !uel is
recommended to mitigate waste storage problems. #oernment subsidies !or renewable
energy e$ploration and deelopment are !urther recommended, as the world is urged to adopt
a sustainable method o! proiding uniersal access to electricity.
Keywords:%uclear power, nonproli!eration, climate change, renewable energy
Introduction
The &'() *nited %ations Treaty on the %on-Proli!eration o! %uclear +eapons %PT
set out clear goals o! adancing technological and political cooperation in the deelopment o!
nuclear power. &' parties /oined the treaty, !orging a commitment to consider nuclear power
and weapons as being legally separate. Despite this clear, unmistakable distinction between
these two uses o! nuclear material, political actiist groups continue to associate the two as i!
they were not mutually e$clusie. #reenpeace 0&1 opined that, 2there is nothing 3peace!ul4
about all things nuclear5. Regardless o! such indictments, the *nited %ations has consistently
endorsed the use o! nuclear power as a replacement !or !ossil !uel electricity generation, or as
a mitigation technology 6P77, 0&8 0&1.
6t is true that 2concerns oer reactor sa!ety, radioactie waste transport, waste
disposal, and proli!eration5 6P77, 0& constrain growth and deelopment in nuclear
power. 9et, i! we approach the issue as positiists, embracing both the rule o! law and proen
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
2/48
science, we !ind threats hae long been taken care o!. 6n addition to the %PT and other
weapons bans, the 6nternational Atomic :nergy Agency 6A:A administers other treaties on
%uclear ;a!ety &''1, on the ;a!ety o! ;pent Fuel and Radioactie +aste
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
3/48
This article presents an eidence-based inuiry on nuclear power, its sa!ety record and
rating, its competitieness as a power source, and its place in the !uture global energy mi$.
The research includes reiew and analyses o! economic, scienti!ic, political, and regulatory
enironments in the energy sector. 7ompeting economic and enironmental interests are
!ound as the world tries to deal with climate change and reduction o! greenhouse gas #E#
emissions. Fossil !uels, and coal in particular, are critici"ed as outdated technologies !or
global scale power production due to enironmental impacts. 6nnoatie carbon-capture
systems proide no repriee !or coal power because they are not economically un!easible.
Theoretical super-power sources like !usion are likewise not !ound to be a realistic option !or
the middle to later 0&stcentury, when !ossil !uel reseres are e$pected to be in scarce
uantities. Despite the researchers4 iew that !ossil !uels are inappropriate sources o! energy,
renewables like wind, solar, and hydroelectric are not endorsed as e$clusie substitutes.
Rather, nuclear power is assessed as the most attractie alternatie to coal, yet e$pansie
renewable deployment is simultaneously !ound to be adantageous.
This article !inds our power grids should be transitioned to and sustained by atomic
energy the other clean energy. Although the longer-term !uture is unpredictable, nuclear
power is shown to o!!er ample, sustainable, and near carbon-neutral power !or more than &
years, into a time when energy is crucial and !uels somewhat threatened. 6ncreased
technological RD, sa!ety systems management, and international cooperation are
paramount to a success!ul rebirth o! nuclear as the remaining rational choice in power. Cased
upon !acts discoered, this article takes a critical iew o! opposition to nuclear power and
outdated regulatory regimes. Recommendations include reision o! nuclear insurance pool
systems. A globali"ed regulatory and !inancial protection enironment is proposed whereby
public and priate entities cooperate to ensure sa!ety and security. Reprocessing o! spent
nuclear !uel is recommended to mitigate waste storage problems. #oernment subsidies !or
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
4/48
renewable energy e$ploration and deelopment are !urther recommended, as the world is
urged to adopt a sustainable method o! proiding uniersal access to electricity.
A Staple Base Power Source
Goad oer any grid aries at di!!erent times o! day. 6n order to supply the changing
demand, generation is broken down into base load, intermediate, and peak segments. Case
load power is generated by plants that hae low operating costs and consistent !uel. 7apacity
!actor, or the percent o! time a plant operates at !ull output, also in!luences what part o! the
load cycle plants will sere. %uclear plants usually hae a capacity !actor o! around 'H,
compared to 11H !or hydro, 0-1H !or wind, and B-&'H !or solar Frank, 0&1, making
nuclear a per!ect base load source alongside coal. #eothermal has a good capacity !actor !or
base load power, but high costs hae hitherto kept it !rom acuiring signi!icant market shares.
7ombined cycle gas plants can ramp up and turn down production uickly, making them
staple intermediate sources, but higher operating costs hae kept gas !rom seriously
competing with coal as a base load source Kaplan, 0), although gas production is
growing as the world tries to cut emissions. +ind and solar are sub/ect to intermittent
shutdowns caused by weather8 that, and high capital costs make wind and solar good peak
demand sources, but nothing more consistent at utility scales. 6t should be noted that micro-
scale, o!!-grid wind and solar generators alongside adanced battery storage technologies
hae made sel!-su!!icient housing and !arming realistic options !or indiiduals and !amilies.
Trends in Production and Consumption
+orld electricity generation increased by about )(H between &'' and 0&&, when it
sat at 0& petawatt hours :6A, 0&1. Production should increase to >' petawatt hours by
01 :6A, 0&>a. 6A:A 0&& !orecasted 11-''H growth in nuclear power generating
capacity between 0& and 0>B, making it the second !astest-growing source behind
renewable energies :6A, 0&>a. 6n 0&1, only about &&H o! the world4s electricity came
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
5/48
!rom nuclear power. Fie countries *;A, France, Russia, ;outh Korea, and 7hina
generate about two-thirds o! the roughly 0.1 gigawatt hours produced among all reactors
worldwide ;chneider and Froggatt, 0&1. ;ince 0&, thirteen countries relied upon nuclear
to generate at least 0BH o! their total electricity, but nuclear power has not yet been deployed
widely. 6n 0&1, only > countries were home to the 1>B total !unctional reactors worldwide
%:6, 0&1.
%uclear power generation declined signi!icantly !ollowing Fukushima, both in net
terawatt hours and share o! electricity production ;chneider and Froggatt, 0&1. #ermany
closed all reactors that began in &') or earlier and owed to close all other reactors by 000
:uropean 7ommission, 0&1. 6n ;wit"erland, 1H o! power comes !rom nuclear, and
despite a public ote in !aor o! keeping it, the goernment decided to phase out reactors by
0>1 +orld %uclear Association, 0&1a. The :* as a whole set a goal to supply 0=H o! its
energy with renewables by 0> :uropean 7ommission, 0&1a, but renewables cannot
replace nuclear powerper se. 6! nuclear power generation or growth is decreased or stalled, it
is nearly certain that a !ossil !uel source will replace it, which makes it more di!!icult to
achiee aggressie targets !or reduction o! greenhouse gas emissions.
Renewable technologies are relatiely new compared to other sources, giing them a
natural adantage in growth markets, which attracts the attention o! economists. ?pportunity
cost may also in!luence inestment in renewables in the early 0&stcentury. #ien the
unpredictable !uture o! rare earth mineral prices, and their integral role in wind turbines,
recent inestors may be buying into renewables with !uture rare earth prices in mind. A
dierse energy mi$ is desirable, and in the longer-term nuclear power is not likely threatened
by e$pansie use o! renewables because renewables are not suitable !or base load power
generation. Realistically, though, neither is coal threatened by renewable generation at global
utility scales. Eigh capital costs and capacity !actors !urther constrain solar, wind, and
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
6/48
geothermal to supplemental producers, though their logistical growth trend has been and
should continue to be robust until it reaches its upper limit.
A Comparison of Plant Costs
%uclear plants are among the most e$pensie !acilities to build, but they are also able
to generate more power than other sources. :6A 0&>b !ound costs !or nuclear plants were
less than municipal solid waste, dual !lash geothermal, o!!shore wind, biomass, !uel cell
natural gas, and single unit coal gasi!ication with carbon capture. A dual unit nuclear reactor
pro/ect costs about the same as single unit puleri"ed coal with carbon capture, and pumped
storage hydroelectric generators. :6A !ound !i$ed costs !or nuclear are higher than all other
coal, gas, wind, solar, and hydroelectric sources, but less than combined cycle biomass,
municipal solid waste, and geothermal. %uclear power weighs-in as the cheapest in terms o!
ariable costs among gas, coal, biomass, and municipal solid waste. 7onstruction costs are
high !or nuclear plants, but !uel costs are lower than gas and coal. As a result, total cost per
kilowatt-hour !or nuclear are lower than those !or !ossil steam, gas turbine, and small scale
utilities :6A, 0&>c.
Gow !uel costs currently make nuclear a competitie source o! electricity, despite high
capital inestment costs. 7apital cost concerns tend to !aor combustion turbine or combined
cycle natural gas plants, which run about &0-&'H the price o! nuclear plants :6A, 0&>b.
Eence, opportunities !or utility serice proiders in the immediate !uture lie primarily in the
gas sector considering goernment emissions regulations !aor gas oer coal. The !uture,
howeer, may not be as simple. 7hanging goernment incenties, air emissions controls, and
!uel costs could threaten !ossil !uel production considerably, leaing nuclear power as the
remaining economically !easible source !or base load power. +ith some strategic
policymaking, goernments can also rein the costs o! geothermal plant construction, thereby
proiding !urther competition !or !ossil !uels as the wells and mines deplete.
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
7/48
6n 0(, in the *nited ;tates, publicly owned utilities generated only 00H o! all
power, while inestor-owned utilities and independent power producers supplied near eual
shares !or the remaining demand Kaplan, 0). Priati"ation and liberali"ation o! electricity
utilities, as seen in the *nited ;tates and :urope Eeddenhausen, 0= will only increase the
!ocus on pro!itability. Rising construction and !uel costs toward the middle o! the 0&stcentury
will likely pose challenges to e$ecuties and board members, whose primary duty is to
ma$imi"e shareholder wealth. %aturally, the !ocus among ma/or suppliers and operators will
likely be to turn to global markets. 7apital costs !or adanced nuclear technologies in 7hina
are lower than supercritical coal and onshore wind in the *;A and +estern :urope Rong
and Iictor, 0&0. Plant costs change !rom country to country depending on costs o! labor.
;ince the ma/ority o! new demand !or electricity through the 0&stcentury is e$pected to come
!rom the deeloping world, where labor costs are lower, nuclear power remains a !inancially
!easible option in global markets. Eoweer, the pre!erence !or cleaner energy may still come
at a cost to goernments.
Nuclear Development Subsidies
6n 0&, the *nited ;tates goernment gae more than J>= billion in energy
subsidies, 1H o! which went to renewables :6A, 0&&. The :nergy Policy Act 0B
authori"ed !ederal loan guarantees !or nuclear deelopment. Ta$ breaks !urther help promote
the industry. 6n 7anada, low population density and high per capita natural resource base
make it a less-than-suitable global model, though other countries can !ind some sense o!
direction by looking into 7anada4s energy plans. The 7anadian 7lean :nergy Fund helps
keep )H o! the country4s power coming !rom sources that do not emit greenhouse gases,
including nuclear %R7A%, 0&>. As o! 0&0, the :uropean *nion had proided a
cumulatie historical total o! 00 in direct support !or nuclear plants and nearly ( in RD
!unding !or !ission energy Clok, 0&1. ?biously, many o! those programs !ell back on their
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
8/48
heels !ollowing Fukushima, but :* energy deelopment could not hae occurred without
signi!icant goernment support.
7ritics o! nuclear energy may tout its subsidies as running contrary to !ree market
principles, or as an industry li!e support system whose alue is greater than that o! the energy
produced Koplow, 0&&. 6t is !act that the nuclear power industry is not iable without
subsidies, but neither is any other energy. Pundits who ili!y atomic energy generally do so in
support o! renewable energies, but taking aim at nuclear power merely rein!orces coal4s
supremacy worldwide. Fossil !uels reap more subsidies than nuclear and renewables
combined *%:P, 0&>8 6:A, 0&B. 7oal receies more than any other energy product, with
its post-ta$ subsidies amounting to nearly 1H o! global #DP according to an 6
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
9/48
A global agreement to phase out all !ossil !uel subsidies has been recommended
+hitley, 0&>. *n!ortunately, /ob loss and energy market decline would likely result i!
!unds were pulled out without being sunk back into another niche. ;o, rather than merely
eliminating !ossil !uel subsidies, another option is to take !rom one and gie to another
reduce subsidies !rom coal and increase those !or clean energy sources, like nuclear and other
renewables. ;uch an idea is undoubtedly unpopular among coal lobbyists, but it would
in!luence the market in a direction more supportie o! enironmental ob/ecties. 7onsidering
political conditions, the most pragmatic solution at this stage is probably to increase nuclear
and renewable industry subsidies to leels near those granted to !ossil !uels.
The ow!"arbon Future "ase
Due to negatie political attitudes toward nuclear power and still low-scale
inestment in renewables, !ossil !uels are e$pected to supply up to )H o! energy demands
by 0>. Theoretically, nuclear power could replace coal power, but it !aces serious
challenges with public opinion, which !ocuses on perceied dangers o! production and waste
storage @?:, 0&. %eertheless, climate change has already prompted indiiduals,
companies, and societies to make behaioral changes intended to reduce carbon emissions.
The !uture is yet unknown, but it is plausible that through the latter-hal! o! the 0&stcentury,
we could come to lie in a world where a combination o! carbon ta$es, resource scarcity, and
public resistance to emissions change the way we think about and use energy. Renewable
energy can help reduce the amount o! carbon sent into the atmosphere, but renewables are not
suitable !or base load production. Fuel prices !or gas could create pro!itability issues beyond
0B. 7lean coal is not currently an option due to high costs and &B-0H energy penalty *;
D?:, 0&>8 +orld %uclear Association, 0&1b. 7lean coal4s 7anadian debut came by way
o! the Coundary Dam Pro/ect, a billion dollar &
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
10/48
publicly traded companies ;askpower, 0&18 Kemp, 0&1. %uclear power stands out as
haing multiple bene!its as we enter a time o! unprecedented energy consciousness.
%uclear power should appeal to people concerned about both climate change and
global corporate ethics. Although nuclear waste disposal presents certain enironmental
challenges, there are reprocessing options, and the power generation process produces much
less carbon than !ossil !uels. Additionally, while uranium is a nonrenewable natural resource
reuired !or nuclear power, uranium mining and processing organi"ations are sub/ect to !ar
more e$tensie regulations than the aerage e$traction industry player. As a result o!
international controls oer uranium supplies, there is less room !or human rights abuses and
corruption when compared to oil, gas, and coal. Access to electricity is a human right Tully,
0(, and nuclear power increases our potential to satis!y this basic need. 6n an era o!
?ccupy moements and protests oer oligopolies, nuclear power o!!ers some clean
competition in a notoriously dirty industry.
%otwithstanding the merits o! nuclear power as a clean alternatie, public opinion
swayed against its use and e$pansion een in nuclear-!riendly countries. Cird et al 0&1
reported on changing public opinion in Australia, where the ma/ority o! surey respondents
supported nuclear power /ust be!ore Fukushima, and then did an about !ace shortly a!ter the
accident. This type o! !ear!ul reaction is not uniue to Australia, but it is perhaps more
signi!icant !or Australians, who battle some o! the highest 7? 0emissions per capita in the
world. :ssentially, what Australians and others are !acing is a dilemma oer whether they
want greater perceied sa!ety !rom nuclear incidents or actual cleaner energy.
;till, reliance on gas and coal oer nuclear does not necessarily guarantee sa!ety.
Rather, !or most countries, !ossil !uels present other serious security and sa!ety threats.
7ompetition !or oil and gas is ery !reuently a contributory cause o! military con!lict @?:,
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
11/48
0&. Dependence on !oreign oil and gas likewise presents serious economic threats in the
eent o! shortage, supply channel blockade, embargo, and e$port uotas.
Political Volatility and European Energy Security
Cy 0>, the :* is e$pected to depend on imports !or =H o! its energy needs F1:,
0&1. France and 6taly are e$pected to completely run out o! !ossil !uels by 0&B, with the
*K !ollowing by 00 Iincent, 0&1. About >H o! :urope4s gas in 0&1 came !rom
Russia Pirani et al, 0&1, which is perceied as a potential threat considering political
tensions oer *kraine %elsen, 0&1. 6n a dual e!!ort to cut emissions and increase energy
security, the :* plans to generate 1-11H o! its power !rom renewables by 0>B, using gas
!or 0)->>H o! electricity, and nuclear !or &=-0&H :urogas, 0&>. ;hale-gas basins are
!ound across :urope, but e$traction is banned is 1 countries and e$tremely limited in others
The :conomist, 0&1.
+e cannot conclude at this stage that :uropean energy security is threatened to a
speci!ic uantitatie degree, but military sources suggest increased competition !or shares o!
a limited supply o! resources could spark con!lict @?:, 0&. 7onsidering the new
integrated global economic model, we e$pect any serious olatility or depreciation in one
mega-market i.e. *;A, :*, 7hina to negatiely impact global economic conditions, as was
the case in early 0&stcentury !inancial crises. 6n!ectious !inancial crisis will likely continue to
e$ist during times o! military con!lict, both between states and between non-state actors and
states. ;uch conditions threaten healthy business actiity, driing up costs !or consumers and
restricting access among lower classes, !urther contributing to stri!e.
Rare Earth ineral Shortages
+ind !arms are a brilliant idea, but high-per!ormance turbines reuire about two tons
o! rare earth minerals @ones, 0&>. 7hina holds a near-monopoly on rare earths production,
with more than 'BH o! global output coming !rom the mainland 6es, 0&>. 6n 0&, 7hina
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
12/48
cut e$port uotas on rare earths, which led to soaring prices on global markets and a
complaint by the *;A at the +orld Trade ?rgani"ation&. Cei/ing cited 3enironmental
concerns4 as reason !or e$port restrictions, but the +T? panel decided 7hina had iolated
international trade law to 2achiee industrial policy goals5 rather than to protect the
enironment @olly, 0&1.
%onetheless, enironmental concerns are legitimate when it comes to producing rare
earths. 7hina may manu!acture 'BH o! the world4s supply, but the country only holds about
>(H o! global reseres. The *nited ;tates actually holds about &>H o! global reseres
*%:P, 0&&, but produces ne$t to nothing, like Australia, which holds BH o! world
reseres. The primary reason R::s hae not been mined pro!itably in the *;A !or the past
couple decades is that pollution is a nearly unaoidable aspect o! e$traction and production
:PA, 0&0. R::s are recyclable, but recent estimates show recycled products account !or
only about &H o! supply.
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
13/48
upstream !rom the plant into a reseroir, displacing people and damaging ecosystems Gedec
and Luintero, 0>. Recent research has shown that the !ormerly terrestrial organic material,
such as trees and bushes lying beneath manmade reseroirs, emit signi!icant amounts o!
#E#s about 1H o! global emissions !rom inland waters Carros et al, 0&&. +hile #E#
emissions are not a deal-breaker !or hydroelectric deelopment, human rights concerns are
gaining increasing attention as indigenous people are o!ten threatened by such in!rastructure
pro/ects.
The +orld +ildli!e Fund ++F, 0> reported that between 1 and ) million
people had been displaced by one or more o! the 1), dams in operation in the year 0>.
Eoshour and Kala!ut 0& !ound that between &') and 0, more than & million people
annually were displaced by dam and urban transport deelopment. 6ndigenous people,
women, the elderly, poor, and handicapped people are disproportionately a!!ected by
inoluntary resettlement when compared to more a!!luent groups +orld Cank, 018 ibid.
Although dams o!!er cheap, clean power, we !ound human rights concerns preclude
recommendation o! e$panded dam systems. 6nstead, we suggest renewable e$pansion should
be built upon solar, wind, tidal, and geothermal energy pro/ects with goernment support.
No "usion
%uclear !usion, the same energy created by the sun, is the dark horse o! the energy
race. A !ew hope!ul engineers beliee a !usion-powered electric plant could be built !or lower
cost than a coal plant, but nobody knows i! !usion is possible outside o! computer-generated
models Coyle, 0&1. A!ter B years o! research and deelopment, no !usion reactor has
produced more energy than it consumes 7owley, 0&. The record !or energy release in a
!usion eent is held by the @oint :uropean Torus, which generated =H o! input power
6T:R, 0&B. Although !usion per!ormance parameters hae increased by a !actor o! &,
oer B years o! research, the science still needs to improe by a !actor o! almost & in order
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
14/48
to produce the core o! a plant ibid a target that could be a limit that can only be
approached but neer reached. :en i! !usion energy does proe itsel! possible in the real
world, the !irst commercial reactors are not e$pected until mid-0&st century at best Thomson,
008 7hameides, 0&0. They would not be scalable !or decades therea!ter, leaing e$awatts
o! new demand to be met by e$isting sources.
Price Elasticity
:lectricity is a necessity o! modern li!e and, as such, demand is relatiely inelastic
Cernstein and #ri!!in, 0(. That is, when price increases, demand stays the same or
decreases insigni!icantly. Eoweer, consumers are likely to modi!y behaior in response to
long-term price increases. Residential consumers !aced with consistent annual increases in
electricity costs will take measures such as turning down air conditioning units, turning o!!
lights and appliances when not in use, replacing incandescent bulbs with high-e!!iciency
!luorescent ones, etc. 7ommercial and industrial consumers will seek to cut oerhead by
inesting in higher-e!!iciency euipment, and designing new !acilities to ma$imi"e usage o!
natural light and cooling. A more aggressie approach entails !itting homes, businesses, and
industrial estates with renewable energy generators like solar or wind. A result o! energy-
conscious behaior changes is long-term reduction in per capita electricity consumption, or
delayed elastic responses ;iddiui, 0>8 Corenstein, 0'.
The :PA 0B !orecasts demand elasticity to rise oer time. Due to methodological
issues in predicting consumer responses to price increases ;iddiui, 0>, the precise
change in !uture demand per unit price increase is incalculable. 7ommonsense analysis tells
us that there is a static non-"ero demand !loor, which will be approached as price increases
in!initely oer time, but it is not a simple mathematical !unction to construct. As consumers
!ace increasing energy costs across sectors petroleum, gas, and electricity demand !or one
will likely be in!luenced by prices o! others. :nhanced and interrelated demand elasticities
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
15/48
through mid-0&stcentury will undoubtedly a!!ect pre!erences in electricity production
methods. The +orld 7oal Association 0&1 estimated oil and gas supplies will be e$hausted
by the year 0=, with coal !ollowing around the year 0&0B. As we enter an era o!
unprecedented global resource scarcity, the low !uel costs associated with nuclear power will
presumably increase consumer demand.
on# Term and $ery on# Term Future
:$$on e$pects passenger car ownership to more than double between 0& and
0>B, pushing oil demand upward o! &)mbNd. Prices rise to J&(Nbbl in ?P:74s year 0>B
re!erence case. Eigh estimates o! !uture prices remain oer J0Nbbl !or the year 0>
%atural Resources 7anada, 0&. :6A 0&> predicts gas prices will rise by 'H between
0&> and 01, at which time gas will be the largest source o! American electricity and
second largest energy source behind petroleum. These outlooks are not contradicted by
!orecasts !rom the *K Department o! :nergy 7limate 7hange 0&>, which has coal
prices set to increase by about >H by 0>. ;uch price changes re!lect not only in!lationary
economics, but also potential shortages o! gradually diminishing natural resources.
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
16/48
*ranium is another !inite resource, though more abundant than gas and oil, and
possibly more than coal. Gow estimates !or longeity o! current supplies are oer & years
6A:A, 0&0, and higher estimates e$tend more than 0 years +orld %uclear Association,
0&1. Reprocessing o! spent !uel, breeder reactors, and theoretical processes like seawater-
uranium e$tract could e$tend the li!e o! the resource inde!initely Fetter, 0'. ?ne o! the
adantages uranium has when compared to other !uels is the location o! its supplies. +ith
1&H o! known recoerable global resources in Australia, 7anada, and the *nited ;tates
+orld %uclear Association, 0&1, ma/or nuclear power producers in %orth America and
+estern :urope will hae more stable access to supplies than i! the resources were stationed
in lesser-deeloped countries. Prices will undoubtedly rise and !ace olatility as oil and gas
run low, which will likely drie innoation and growth in renewables, but toward the end o!
the 0&stcentury, uranium should be a pre!erred resource as climate change concerns continue
to plague the coal industry.
The No$Substitute %tility Sources Case
;ince the late &)s, humans hae witnessed technological and scienti!ic change
unparalleled in prior history. ;ince ++66, people made e$ponential adancements in all
areas o! natural sciences, including addition o! entirely new !ields. Aside !rom basic physical
and biological processes, we lie completely di!!erent lies than people only a hand!ul o!
generations be!ore us. Despite optimistic !orecasts !rom inestment bankers and researchers,
such radical change is unlikely to continue at the breakneck speeds obsered oer the past
century. +hile we are likely to see incremental improements in technological e!!iciencies
and decreases in si"e in the coming decades, humans may not e$perience another scienti!ic
reolution !or millennia.
A !usion reaction may neer be sustained. Asteroid mining may neer be an
economically !easible option !or haresting minerals. ;hould the continent thaw, we may !ind
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
17/48
Antarctica does not hae enough !ossil !uels to sustain so much as another & years o!
consumption. ;olar cells may neer be e!!icient and a!!ordable enough to acuire so much as
&H o! a commercial utility market. Cio!uels may neer produce an :R?6 high enough to
make them commercially scalable. 7onsidering the trend o! increasing global population and
energy demand, i! one were to lie into the 00 ndcentury absent near-miraculous scienti!ic
breakthroughs, it seems one may be le!t with little choice but to learn to loe nuclear !ission
power because it would be the only a!!ordable, scalable, high-uality source o! electricity
aailable. To abandon its use or to curtail its deelopment at any stage would be e$tremely
shortsighted.
That being established, reliance upon nuclear !ission !or power production in the ery
long term is likewise unwise. *ranium is a nonrenewable resource, and while its supply is
e$pected to outlast that o! other nonrenewable resources, eentually the world will be without
this essential !ission material. 7ontemporary economic thought tends to limit !orecasting and
planning to within a !ew decades, and optimism regarding technological adancement tends
to takeoer when considering the ery long term !uture, but hitherto there has been no hard
eidence that a new power source will arise, and it is not unlikely that reolutionary scienti!ic
change will not come again !or seeral centuries. Thus, sa!eguarding the !uture entails
prolonging the li!espan o! nonrenewable resources ia diersi!ication o! energy production8
and reducing, reusing, and recycling to the e$tent possible.
Subsidi&ing and 'ncentivi&ing Rene#able Energies
Despite their reliance upon rare earth minerals, renewable technologies are an integral
part o! the !uture energy mi$. #eothermal, wind, and solar hae no !uel costs, but up!ront
costs in the absence o! subsidies usually make utility-scale renewable !acilities less
economically attractie !or publicly traded companies, whose !iduciary duty maintains the
highest priority. As a result, indiiduals may play the biggest role in growth o! solar and wind
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
18/48
power. :specially important to the !uture o! the common enironment is o!!-grid solar and
wind installations. As uniersal access to electricity becomes a reality, locali"ed green
production is !undamental to maintenance o! both human rights and enironmental goals.
Recogni"ing these !acts, the *nited %ations 0&B awarded its !irst J& million *%-D:;A
:nergy #rant to !inance o!!-grid solar power production !or medical clinics in the deeloping
world.
Gong term, incremental growth in use o! sustainable technologies at the consumer and
!amily business leel can only occur with subsidies, ta$ rebates, and incenties. Gikewise,
utility scale solar and wind power can only become economically competitie with other
technologies gien goernment subsidies !or deelopment . ;ince geothermal pro/ect costs can skyrocket i!
e$ploration yields une$pected results, goernments should also proide capital and personnel
support !or e$ploration pro/ects, including on goernment owned land. Public-priate /oint
e$ploration entures can supplement loan guarantees and subsidies in e!!orts to bring
geothermal to a competitor position in the base load power matri$.
Nuclear %isk and iability
;a!ety has been an oerriding !ocus in nuclear power since inception. Despite public
!ears surrounding meltdown and disaster, which were prooked by the Fukushima incident,
nuclear energy is actually uite sa!e. *nion o! 7oncerned ;cientists 0&1 !ound 2serious
nuclear accidents hae been !ew and !ar between5, citing seen since &'B= Fukushima,
7hernobyl, Three
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
19/48
?! those seen serious accidents, three were o! particular concern Fukushima, 7hernobyl,
and Three
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
20/48
large early release !reuency at & in &, reactor years 7ochran and
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
21/48
+ithout Fukushima, our most recent nuclear disaster would hae been 7hernobyl an
incident we can in!er resulted at least in part !rom ine!!iciencies and corruption o! the ;oiet
empire in its !inal stages. Technological and regulatory improements irtually guarantee
disaster-!ree power production throughout the li!e o! reactors. ;uch !acts are why @apan did
not abandon nuclear power a!ter the horri!ic accident on the %ortheast side o! Eonshu 6sland.
6t is implicit to say that i! Fukushima had not happened, there would not hae been such a
sharp increase in anti-nuclear thought in the mainstream media and political conersation.
;till, little attention has been paid to the underlying cause o! the disaster poor planning.
@apan4s decision to authori"e Fukushima plant construction on the :ast side o! the
island, where seere earthuakes and tsunamis hae been documented throughout history,
was an incomprehensible oersight that ultimately endangered the lies o! millions o! people
!or generations to come. @apan4s entire :astern border sits nearly on top o! a massie !ault
system where the Paci!ic, :urasian, %orth American, and Philippine plates meet. This system
poses an especially high threat !or tsunamis because they are all conergent plates
Annenberg Gearner, 0&18 Damen, n.d..
6! earthuake ha"ards are the main concern, considering how well-made and managed
nuclear reactors are today, nuclear power plants may be built anywhere aside !rom the
+estern edge o! the Americas, the
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
22/48
Actie nuclear power generation !acilities hae ery low incident rates when
compared to other base load power supplies. The eolution o! technologies and standards
make nuclear accidents e$tremely rare. 6t is sa!e to say that had it not been !or the earthuake,
the Fukushima incident would not hae occurred. ?utside o! regions prone to earthuake,
there is irtually no chance o! such a disaster occurring. :en in areas o! mild seismic
actiity, reactors and plants are sa!e, haing been designed to handle earthuakes.
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
23/48
6nNuclear Energy Institute v. EPA01, the !ederal court o! appeals remarked that,
2Ohaing the capacity to outlast human ciili"ation as we know it and the potential to
deastate public health and the enironment, nuclear waste has e$ed scientists, 7ongress,
and regulatory agencies !or the last hal!-century.5 +aste disposal concerns led eight
American states to promulgate statutory restrictions on construction o! new nuclear power
plants absent deelopment o! new waste management options. Fie more states reuire oter
andNor ma/ority legislature approal !or new construction, and two states hae completely
banned nuclear power, presumably due in part to concern oer waste disposal %7;G, 0&B.
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
24/48
Thus, tightly regulated reprocessing is !undamental to energy and public security.
Reprocessing reduces the olume o! nuclear waste and e$tends the li!espan o! the world4s
supply o! nuclear material nearly inde!initely. Roughly ''.)=H o! uranium and ''.>(
''.B&H o! plutonium can be recoered through recycling %uclear :nergy Agency, 0&0.
Eoweer, reprocessing costs are likely to remain higher than direct storage costs unless the
market price o! uranium is oer J>( & times current leels Cunn et al., 0>.
%otwithstanding these added costs, France supplies &=H o! its electricity using recycled
nuclear !uel, and roughly 0H o! spent !uel worldwide is reprocessed 6A:A, 0)8 +orld
%uclear Association, 0&B.
6n the long term, the most economical and enironmentally responsible option appears
to be recycling o! spent !uel. %onetheless, whether initial spent !uel is recycled and reused or
stored directly, waste is ineitable. Guckily, transport, storage, and reprocessing technologies
are incredibly trustworthy in the modern age, leaing terrorism and maleolent acts the main
concerns Feieson et al, 0&&.
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
25/48
maintain !inancial protection by purchasing nuclear liability insurance !rom American
%uclear 6nsurers. ;uppliers in the *nited ;tates may be held legally liable, but the Act
channels economic liability to site owners and operators. The Department o! :nergy and
%uclear Regulatory 7ommission are !urther authori"ed under the Act to indemni!y nuclear
!acilities !or claims in e$cess o! reuired insurance coerage A%6, 0&>a.
6n :urope, the &'( Paris 7onention on Third Party Giability in the Field o! %uclear
:nergy holds site operator companies e$clusiely liable !or most incidents. ;imilarly, the
&'(> Iienna 7onention on 7iil Giability !or %uclear Damage holds operators liable, and
not suppliers. Following 7hernobyl, a /oint protocol was implemented between the two
treaties to handle claims resulting !rom transboundary contamination.
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
26/48
+hile statutory mandate o! !inancial protection is an essential element o! a reasonable
nuclear power system, it is simultaneously important that insurance premiums and threat o!
!riolous or runaway claims not be allowed to preent research and deelopment in nuclear
energy. 6n the *nited ;tates, the aerage annual premium !or a single-unit reactor site in the
year 0&1 was J&.& million !or J>=B million in !irst tier coerage *;%R7, 0&1. 6n
addition, each policyholder may be held liable !or oer J&0 million per reactor as part o! the
second tier o! protection, regardless o! whether or not any claim was made against the
policyholder. The second tier !und is alued at oer J&0 billion between the &1 reactors in
the insurance pool. The !ederal goernment assumes control o! the secondary tier !und i! &BH
o! it is spent, and in the eent o! its e$haustion, 7ongress may proide additional support.
6nsurance companies, like any business, stay alie by generating more reenues than
e$penses, but the nuclear insurance sector is e$traordinarily lucratie. A%6 0&>c sets aside
=BH o! premiums in a resere !und intended to pay !or claims. A!ter ten years, a portion o!
premiums is returned to policyholders. Cetween &'B=, when Price-Anderson was enacted,
and 0&1, insurance pools paid out a total o! J&B& million, with an additional J(B million
paid by the Department o! :nergy %A67, 0&1. That is less than two current years o!
premiums paid out in nearly ( years, leaing A%6 well within the black. As the operator o!
the Fukushima Daiichi plant, T:P7? was reuired to compensate people a!!ected by the
meltdown cost estimates ranged !rom JBB billion to oer J& billion 6na/ima and ;ong,
0&08 Gong, 0&>. ;o, not only are nuclear insurance pools creating high costs !or utility
companies by way o! policy premiums in an generally accident-!ree operating enironment,
but in the eent o! a ma/or accident such as Fukushima, the collectie insurance !und would
swi!tly become insolent, leaing the ma/ority o! the !inancial responsibility to the
goernment.
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
27/48
%uclear insurance pools emerged during the &'Bs in response to goernment,
industry, and public pressure. At that time, technologies and methods were new, and there
was no statistical data with which to deelop predictie algorithms that could help uanti!y
risks %uclear Risk 6nsurers Gtd., 0&1. A!ter ( years o! operation and deelopment,
probability o! catastrophe is known to be remarkably low. Towards 0>, non-?:7D
countries, especially in Asia, are e$pected to grow energy demand, and as a result build the
lion4s share o! new nuclear reactors 6A:A, 0&1. ;tate o! the art technologies !urther the
cause o! public sa!ety when it comes to new plants in deeloping countries like 7hina, where
0) new units are under construction and scheduled to be online be!ore 00 ;cheider and
Froggatt, 0&1. Eoweer, as the scale o! risk is magni!ied with dispersion o! these
technologies, it is especially important that goernment agencies responsible !or oerseeing
nuclear power recogni"e and en!orce globally accepted regulations. As nuclear power spreads
across legal, economic, linguistic, and political boundaries, protectie mechanisms must also
adapt to the changing operations enironment.
Shared Responsibility and utual Support for Development
6n the ma/ority o! the world, neither are current insurance pool nor goernment !unds
robust enough to handle a disaster the magnitude o! Fukushima. Risk insurance alone limits
the scalability o! nuclear power, which contributes to lack o! access to electricity !or roughly
&=H o! the world4s population, nearly )H o! people in low income countries, and almost
=H o! people in sub-;aharan A!rica +orld Cank, 0&B. Access to electricity is integral to
achieement o! human rights Cradbrook and #ardam, 0(. #lobal-scale deployment o!
nuclear power as a substitute !or coal and supplement to renewable energy is in line with
seeral *nited %ations 0&B ;ustainable Deelopment #oals. 7onsidering the magnitude o!
potential bene!its to the international community that uniersal access to electricity
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
28/48
represents, a !ramework o! e$tensie cooperation and shared accountability is most likely to
help nations accomplish goals gien social, political, and economic circumstances.
%ational and regional insurance proiders hae been insu!!iciently prepared to handle
catastrophic claims !or decades, and calls !or diersi!ication o! protectie methods hae been
consistent at high leels o! goernment ?:7D, &'''8 Eariharan, 0&&8 Rimsaite, 0&>. 6n
the :uropean *nion, competition laws hae preented broader pooling o! insurance !unds
across international borders. :lsewhere, capital markets are too small to proide inestment
opportunities !or insurance !unds, leaing nuclear sa!ety nets oerly e$posed to !oreign
market risks. 7urrent !inancial and business regulations around the world are incompatible
with the ob/ecties o! nuclear liability insurance, considering that any serious accident will
result in de!ault reliance upon public !unds.
Following Fukushima, thousands o! indiiduals in Tokyo !iled a class action lawsuit
against #eneral :lectric, Toshiba, and Eitachi !or !ailure to implement sa!ety improements
to ageing euipment in the power plant Tauintic-
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
29/48
+hateer the priate capital arrangement may be, it is clear that a tragedy such as
Fukushima though we shall likely neer witness such a thing again reuires immediate,
complete, and e$haustie public !unding. As such, the protectie !inancial measures set out in
the 7;7 are an appropriate addition to the current operating enironment. 6n a world o!
increasing population, urbani"ation, and international trade, it is !undamental to the global
mission that goernments respond swi!tly, resolutely, and collectiely to the e$tent needed to
& proide medical treatment and relocation serices to a!!ected persons, 0 achiee
containment and cleanup o! ha"ardous materials, > compensate ictims as uickly as
possible, and 1 manage disaster sites inde!initely. ?biously, priate businesses must be
inoled in the process, but the serious managerial disruptions and possible insolencies site
operators may !ace must not negatiely impact the uality o! response.
Gegislatie branches should permit global insurance pools to emerge, organi"ations
that deal e$clusiely with nuclear power utility companies and their suppliers. :ery nuclear
utility in the world should purchase standardi"ed insurance !rom a common set o!
internationally regulated proiders, which collectiely manage a !und that may be drawn
upon as a !irst tier.
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
30/48
%ations desiring to deelop and maintain atomic energy must adhere to strict sa!ety
and uality standards, !rom construction to maintenance, and !inally decommissioning o!
reactor sites. The 6A:A in cooperation with national energy authorities and an independent
international panel o! adisors should conduct routine scheduled and unscheduled spot
inspections o! nuclear power !acilities. ;uch a supranational regulator authority must hae the
power to ley penalties !or noncompliance including mandating repairs, modi!ications to
sa!ety regimes, and temporary plant shutdowns. 7learly, there is no such multilateral
arrangement currently aailable, but the deelopment o! a comprehensie international
system would only !urther ensure the sa!ety o! the public and integrity o! our electrical power
systems.
"onclusions
For seeral decades in the *nited ;tates, there has been an e!!ectie moratorium on
building new nuclear power plants due to public !ears o! accidents, comple$ regulations, and
insurance costs ?47onnell, 0&1. +orldwide, !aith in nuclear power has similarly !aded,
and the !uture o! the industry is less certain than it was be!ore the Fukushima Daiichi disaster
a tragic anomaly in the global nuclear sa!ety record. This article presented clear eidence
that the likelihood o! nuclear accident is ery low, and much lower than those in !ossil !uel
industries. ;imilar to !ear o! !lying in an airplane the sa!est mode o! transportation the
general public4s !ear response toward nuclear is not based upon probabilities or !acts. 6t is our
argument that irrational !ears not take priority oer sound science in the matter o! energy
policy.
%uclear !ission is a remarkably important source o! power in our increasingly energy-
intensie world. *nlike coal, gas, and oil, nuclear energy is irtually carbon-!ree. 6! the
world4s people are to achiee their lo!ty international enironmental goals in an epic e!!ort to
aoid disastrous conseuences o! climate change, cleaner sources o! electricity are needed.
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
31/48
;olar and wind technologies are remarkably important in the energy mi$, but it is neither
sunny nor windy all the time. Eydroelectric dams can proide consistent electricity, but this
option is inadisable due to human rights abuses in the inoluntary resettlement o! people
near dam pro/ects. #eothermal and tidal energies should continue to be e$plored, ideally with
public !inancial support. Eoweer, until costs come down and e!!iciencies improe, still more
robust alternaties are reuired. Presently, nuclear power is the most iable replacement !or
coal power, which generates more than a uarter o! global #E#s double transportation
sector emissions
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
32/48
There are no simple solutions !or the bundle o! problems that come with simultaneous
shortages in nonrenewable resources and increasing greenhouse gas emissions, which are
belieed to cause climate change 6P77, 0&8 0&1. %uclear power is a ital source o!
electricity in the 0&stcentury. Discontinuation o! nuclear power in :urope is neither
scienti!ically nor economically rational @ohnson, 0&&. ;cienti!ic sources show that nuclear
is actually sa!er than other sources, that nuclear has lower operating costs, and that its !uel
has the greatest longeity, especially i! spent !uel is reprocessed.
This paper makes seeral recommendations, including either trans!er o! !ossil !uel
subsidies to renewables and nuclear, or growth o! nuclear and renewable subsidies to match
those granted to !ossil !uel industries. Gegislatie approal !or highly regulated reprocessing
o! spent nuclear !uel is recommended. A supranational regulating body is recommended, one
with the authority to ley penalties !or noncompliance with sa!ety and security standards.
Further recommended is a global liability insurance system, whereby all plant operators and
ma/or suppliers purchase policies !rom a uniersal collectie under guarantee that their policy
premium is the ma$imum !inancial liability they may su!!er i! there is no incident at their
!acility. A second tier o! !inancial protection is recommended through a !und similar to that
outlined in the 7;7. These suggestions are intended to increase nuclear power deelopment
around the world, as a substitute !or coal energy and a supplement to renewable energy.
As the !uture is reealed, nuclear energy is bound to be a mainstay utility because o!
its pragmatic alue. 6nternational nuclear cooperation, !rom cradle to grae, is essential to
ensure sa!ety and security. ;tandards, procedures, methods, protocols and systems should be
shared between nuclear nations and those with ambitions to achiee nuclear energy security.
Iia improed cooperation on ciil use o! nuclear materials !or electricity, nations may also
step closer to their stated goals o! nonproli!eration. At ery least, they can proide a relatie
guarantee against another Fukushima-scale disaster. 7ontinuance and adancement o! atomic
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
33/48
energy naturally entails eoling technological and sa!ety systems. ;uch is the nature o!
physical sciences in our age continuously improing.
%eferences
Ali, ;. 0&1. ;ocial and :nironmental 6mpact o! the Rare :arth 6ndustries.#esources, >,
$%&'$%(. Retrieed !rom httpMNNwww.mdpi.comN0='-'0=(N>N&N&0>Npd!
Andrews, A. 0). %uclear Fuel ReprocessingM *.;. Policy Deelopment. C#S #eport )or
Congress, R;00B10.
A%6 0&>a.Need for Nuclear *ia+ility Insurance in t,e United States. #lastonbury, 7T,
*;AM American %uclear 6nsurers.
A%6 0&>b.Need for Nuclear *ia+ility Insurance outside of t,e United States. #lastonbury,
7T, *;AM American %uclear 6nsurers.
A%6 0&>c.Insuring t,e future of nuclear power worldwide. #lastonbury, 7T, *;AM
American %uclear 6nsurers.
Annenberg Gearner 0&1.Plates " -oundaries. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.learner.orgNinteractiesNdynamicearthNplate.html
Carros, %., 7ole, @., Tranik, G., Prairie, 9., Castiken, D., Eus"ar, I., del #iorgio, P., and
Roland, F. 0&&. 7arbon emission !rom hydroelectric reseroirs linked to reseroir
age and latitude.Nature !eoscience, 1, /&'/0. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.nature.comNngeoN/ournalN1Nn'N!ullNngeo&0&&.html
Cernstein, 'B&0.pd!
Cird, D., Eaynes, K., an den Eonert, R.,
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
34/48
change and the Fukushima disaster.Energy Policy(B, (11-(B>. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.sciencedirect.comNscienceNarticleNpiiN;>&10&B&>'=&>
Clok, K. ed.0&1. Su+sidies and costs of EU energy. Crussels, CelgiumM :uropean
7ommission.
Corenstein, ;. 0'. o 2,at Electricity Price 1o Consumers #espond3 #esidential
1emand Elasticity Under Increasing'-lock Pricing. *niersity o! 7ali!ornia,
Cerkeley. Retrieed !rom
httpMNN!aculty.haas.berkeley.eduNborensteNdownloadN%C:R;60'.pd!
Coyle, A. ?ct. &&, 0&1. 7heaper Than 7oalS Fusion 7oncept Aims to Cridge :nergy #ap.
N-C News. Retrieed !rom httpMNNwww.nbcnews.comNscienceNscience-newsNcheaper-
coal-!usion-concept-aims-bridge-energy-gap-n00>0((
CP 0&1.Energy 4utlook %5&. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.bp.comNenNglobalNcorporateNabout-bpNenergy-economicsNenergy-
outlook.html
Cradbrook, A., and #ardam, @. 0(. Placing the access to energy serices within a human
rights !ramework.6uman #ig,ts 7uarterly, 0)0, >)'-1&B.
Cunn, . ,e Economics of
#eprocessing vs. 1irect 1isposal of Spent Nuclear )uel. 7ambridge, .html
7oady, D., Parry, 6., ;ears, G., and ;hang, C. 0&B. Eow large are global energy subsidiesS
International 8onetary )und 2orking Paper9 +PN&BN&B.
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
35/48
7ochran, T., and
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
36/48
:conomist, The 0&1. Conscious Uncoupling. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.economist.comNnewsNbrie!ingN0&(&&&-reducing-europes-dependence-
russian-gas-possiblebut-it-will-take-time-money-and-sustained
:6A 0&&.1irect )ederal )inancial Interventions and Su+sidies in Energy in )iscal Year
%5$5. Retrieed !rom httpMNNwww.eia.goNanalysisNreuestsNsubsidyN
:6A 0&>.AE4%5$( Early #elease 4verview. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.eia.goN!orecastsNaeoNerNearlyprices.c!m
:6A 0&>a.International Energy 4utlook %5$&. +ashington, D7, *;AM :nergy
6n!ormation Administration. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.eia.goN!orecastsNieoNpd!N1)10&>.pd!
:6A 0&>b. Updated Capital Costs for Utility Scale Electricity !enerating Plants.
+ashington, D7, *;AM *; Department o! :nergy. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.eia.goN!orecastsNcapitalcostNpd!Nupdatedcapcost.pd!
:6A 0&>c. Aerage Power Plant ?perating :$penses !or
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
37/48
:PA 0&0.#are Eart, Elements< A #eview of Production9 Processing9 #ecycling9 and
Associated Environmental Issues. +ashington, D7, *;AM :PA. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNnepis.epa.goNAdobeNPDFNP&:*C7.pd!
:urogas 0&>.*ong'term outlook for gas to %5&. Crussels, CelgiumM :urogas. Retrieed
!rom httpMNNwww.eurogas.orgNuploadsNmediaN:urogasCrochureGong-
Term?utlook!orgasto0>B.pd!
:uropean 7ommission 0&1.Post')ukus,ima Policy. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNehron./rc.ec.europa.euNpost-!ukushima-policy
:uropean 7ommission 0&1a. %5&5 framework for climate and energy policies. Retrieed
!rom httpMNNec.europa.euNclimaNpoliciesN0>Ninde$en.htm
:$$on
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
38/48
httpMNNwww.strategyand.pwc.comNglobalNhomeNwhat-we-thinkNreports-white-
papersNarticle-displayNa!ter-!ukushima-nuclear-power-world
Frank, 7. 0&1. ,e Net +enefits of *ow and No'Car+on Electricity ec,nologies .
+ashington, D7, *;AM Crookings. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.brookings.eduNWNmediaNresearchN!ilesNpapersN0&1NBN&'H0low
H0carbonH0!utureH0windH0solarH0powerH0!rankNnetH0bene!its
H0!inal.pd!
#A? 0&0. Spent Nuclear )uel< Accumulating >uantities at commercial reactors present
storage and ot,er c,allenges. #A?-&0-='=. +ashington, D7, *;AM *nited ;tates
#oernment Accountability ?!!ice.
#reenpeace 0&1.End t,e nuclear age. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.greenpeace.orgNinternationalNenNcampaignsNnuclearN
Eariharan, A. 0&&. 6ndiaVs %uclear 7iil Giability Cill and ;upplierVs GiabilityM ?ne ;tep
Towards
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
39/48
httpMNNwww.ncsl.orgNresearchNenironment-and-natural-resourcesNstates-restrictions-
on-new-nuclear-power-!acility.asp$
Eoshour, K., and Kala!ut, @. 0&.A !rowing !lo+al Crisis< 1evelopment'Induced
1isplacement " #esettlement. ;an Francisco, 7A, *;AM 6nternational Accountability
Pro/ect.
Eunter, P., and Fewtrell, G. 0&. +ater LualityM #uidelines, ;tandards and Eealth 7hapter
&. +orld Eealth ?rgani"ation. Gondon, *KM 6+A Publishing. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.who.intNwatersanitationhealthNdwNiwachap&.pd!
Eydro-Luebec 0&1. ,e Advantages of 6ydropower. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.hydrouebec.comNlearningNhydroelectriciteN
6A:A 0). Spent )uel #eprocessing 4ptions. Iienna, AustriaM 6A:A.
6A:A 0&&. !lo+al Uranium Supply Ensured for *ong erm9 New #eport S,ows. Retrieed
!rom httpMNNwww.iaea.orgNnewscenterNpressreleasesN0&0Nprn0&0&'.html
6A:A 0&>.Nuclear Power #eactors in t,e 2orld. Re!erence Data ;eries %o. 0. Iienna,
AustriaM 6A:A. Retrieed !rom httpMNNwww-
pub.iaea.orgN>web.pd!
6A:A 0&1.International Status and Prospects for Nuclear Power %5$(.
#?IN6%FN0&1N&>-#7B)N6%FN(. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.iaea.orgNAboutNPolicyN#7N#7B)N#7B)6n!DocumentsN:nglishNgcB)in!-
(en.pd!
6:A 0&B.Energy Su+sidies. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.worldenergyoutlook.orgNresourcesNenergysubsidiesN
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
40/48
6na/ima, T., and ;ong, 9. 0&0.)ukus,ima $&B -illion Cost 6as epco Seeking 8ore Aid.
Retrieed !rom httpMNNwww.bloomberg.comNnewsNarticlesN0&0-&&-=N!ukushima-&>=-
billion-cost-has-tepco-seeking-more-aid
6ndia 7iil Giability !or %uclear Damage Act, %o. >) 0&.
6P77 0&. 2orking !roup III< 8itigation. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.ipcc.chNipccreportsNtarNwg>Ninde$.phpSidp&01
6P77 0&1. Climate C,ange Synt,esis #eport. Retrieed !rom
httpsMNNwww.ipcc.chNpd!Nassessment-reportNarBNsyrN;9RARB;P
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
41/48
@olly, D. 0&1, . A ;carcity o! Rare (.yale.eduN!eatureNascarcityo!raremetalsishinderinggreentechnolog
iesN0=&&NS
bcsiscandb'0c)a1!&a(=b!11wbA(%6Ka"hy/nFTF"pKU&DUkLEAAAAy0
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
42/48
Gaw, R. n.d.. Analysis o! Relatie Risks and Geels o! Risk in 7anada. EnereD. Retrieed
!rom httpMNNwww.enere$.caNenNarticlesNanalysis-o!-relatie-risks-and-leels-o!-risk-in-
canada
Gedec, #., and Luintero, @. 0>. !ood and -ad 1ams. 6ndependent unaccountabilityM the 6A:A4s 2step backward5 in regulating
international nuclear reactor sa!ety in the way o! the Fukushima Daiichi disaster.
Suffolk ransnational *aw #eview, >(&, &BB-&)).
Kemp, @. 0&1. Ceyond Coundary Dam, carbon capture costs must come down.#euters.
Retrieed !rom httpMNNwww.reuters.comNarticleN0&1N&N0Ncarboncapture-canada-
kemp-id*;G(%RU1. Coal and !as are )ar 8ore 6armful t,an Nuclear
Power. %A;A. Retrieed !rom httpMNNwww.giss.nasa.goNresearchNbrie!sNkharecha0N
B.
C6llion Tons o! Future 7?0. Scientific
American. Retrieed !rom httpMNNwww.scienti!icamerican.comNarticleNcoal-plants-will-
emit->-billion-tons-o!-!uture-co0N
=, pp.'='-''. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.bigthunderwindpower.caN!ilesNresourcesN:lectricitygenerationandhealt
hTheGancet0=.pd!
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
43/48
%A67 0&1.Nuclear *ia+ility Insurance Price'Anderson ActF. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.naic.orgNciprtopicsNtopicnuclearliabilityinsurance.htm
%atural Resources 7anada 0&.*ong erm 4utlook< Crude 4il Prices to %5&5. Retrieed
!rom httpMNNwww.nrcan.gc.caNenergyNpublicationsNmarketsN(B&&
%:6 0&1. 2orld Statistics. Retrieed !rom httpMNNwww.nei.orgNKnowledge-7enterN%uclear-
;tatisticsN+orld-;tatistics
%elsen, A. 0&1. :uropeVs dependency on Russian gas may be cut amid energy e!!iciency
!ocus. ,e !uardian. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.theguardian.comNworldN0&1NsepN'Neurope-dependency-russian-gas-
energy-e!!iciency-eu
New York v. United States et al., BB *.;. &11 *nited ;tates ;upreme 7ourt, &''0.
%R7A% 0&>. Canada G A !lo+al *eader in #enewa+le Energy. :nergy and F.>d &0B& *nited
;tates 7ourt o! Appeals, District o! 7olumbia 7ircuit, 01.
%uclear Risk 6nsurers, Gtd. 0&1.Nuclear Pools. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.nuclearpools.comNabout-us
%uclear +aste Policy Act, 10 *.;.7. XX &&& et se. &')0.
?47onnell, +. 0&1. 7ausation4s nuclear !utureM applying proportional liability to the Price-
Anderson Act.1uke *aw ?ournal, (1, >>>->=(.
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
44/48
?:7D &'''.#eform of Civil Nuclear *ia+ility. Cudapest, EungaryM ?:7D %uclear :nergy
Agency, 6A:A, :uropean 7ommission, and Eungarian Atomic :nergy Authority.
?P:7 0&>. 2orld 4il 4utlook. Iienna, AustriaM ?P:7.
?saka, :. 0&0. 7orporate Giability, #oernment Giability, and the Fukushima %uclear
Disaster.Pacific #im *aw and Policy ?ournal, 0&>, 1>>-1B'.
Pacific !as " Electric Company9 et al. v. State Energy #esources Conservation and
1evelopment Commission9 et al., 1(& *.;. &' ;upreme 7ourt &')>.
Perlman, E. 0&1. Eydroelectric power water use. US 1ept. of Interior !eological Survey.
Retrieed @une &1, 0&1 !rom httpMNNwater.usgs.goNeduNwuhy.html
Pirani, ;., Eenderson, @., Eonore, A., Rogers, E., and 9a!imaa, K. 0&1. 2,at t,e Ukraine
crisis means for gas markets. ?$!ord 6nstitute !or :nergy ;tudies. Retrieed
!rom httpMNNwww.o$!ordenergy.orgNwpcmsNwp-contentNuploadsN0&1N>N+hat-
the-*kraine-crisis-means-!or-gas-markets-#P7->.pd!
Price-Anderson Act, s.&= o! the Atomic :nergy Act o! &'B1, as amended in &'(=, &'==,
&')=, and 0B.
Rimsaite, G. 0&>. %uclear 6nsurance PoolsM Does the Eori"ontal 7ooperation leads to the
))>.pd!
Rosner, R., and #oldberg, ;. 0&&, -
0'PanelPDFPresentation.pd!S
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
45/48
bcsiscan&>a&!>1'1&b10>>dbcsiscan!ilename>-
0'PanelPDFPresentation.pd!
;askpower 0&1.-oundary 1am Car+on Capture ProHect. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNsaskpowerccs.comNccs-pro/ectsNboundary-dam-carbon-capture-pro/ectN
;chneider,
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
46/48
*%:P 0&&. #reen :conomy Iulnerable to Rare :arth . !lo+al trends in renewa+le energy investment %5$&. Frank!urt, #ermanyM
Frank!urt ;chool *%:P 7ollaborating 7entre.
*nion o! 7oncerned ;cientists 0&1.A -rief 6istory of Nuclear Accidents 2orldwide.
Retrieed !rom httpMNNwww.ucsusa.orgNnuclearpowerNmaking-nuclear-power-
sa!erNpreenting-nuclear-accidentsNnuclear-accidents-a-brie!-
history.htmlY.I#Ea+Pm*e;o
*nited Kingdom Department o! :nergy 7limate 7hange 0&>.1ECC )ossil )uel Price
ProHections. Gondon, :nglandM *KD:77. Retrieed !rom
httpsMNNwww.go.ukNgoernmentNuploadsNsystemNuploadsNattachmentdataN!ileN0&0B0&
N&>=&)decc-!ossil-!uel-price-pro/ections.pd!
*nited %ations Treaty on the %on-Proli!eration o! %uclear +eapons &'().
*nited ;tates Department o! :nergy 0&>. Car+on Capture ec,nology Program.
+ashington D7, *;AM D?: %ational :nergy Technology Gaboratory. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.netl.doe.goNFileH0GibraryNResearchN7oalNcarbonH0captureNProgram-
Plan-7arbon-7apture-0&>.pd!S
bcsiscandb'0c)a1!&a(=b!1N)hAE+;t
ALM&
*nited %ations 0&B. 2e Care Solar is awarded US$ million United Nations Energy
!rant to eDpand t,e use of life'saving Solar Suitcase. Retrieed !rom
httpsMNNpoweringthe!uture.un.orgNnewsNawardceremony0&B
*nited %ations ;ustainable Deelopment #oals 0&B. Retrieed !rom
httpsMNNsustainabledeelopment.un.orgNtopics
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
47/48
*;#; 0&1.Europe Eart,>uake Information. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNearthuake.usgs.goNearthuakesNworldNinde$.phpSregion:urope
*;%R7 0&1. %uclear 6nsurance and Disaster Relie!.-ackgrounder. +ashington, D7,
*;AM %uclear Regulatory 7ommission ?!!ice o! Public A!!airs.
*;%R7 0&Ba. Spent fuel storage in pools and dry casks. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.nrc.goNwasteNspent-!uel-storageN!as.html
*;%R7 0&Bb.-ackgrounder on #adioactive 2aste. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.nrc.goNreading-rmNdoc-collectionsN!act-sheetsNradwaste.html
Iienna 7onention on 7iil Giability !or %uclear Damage &''=.
Iincent, @. 0&1. Fossil !uelsM *K to Vrun out o! oil, gas and coalV in !ie years. ,e
Independent. Retrieed !rom httpMNNwww.independent.co.ukNnewsNukNuk-to-run-out-
o!-!ossil-!uels-in-!ie-years-'>)B1&B.html
+hite Eouse 0&&.Promoting Clean9 #enewa+le Energy< Investments in 2ind and Solar.
Retrieed !rom httpsMNNwww.whitehouse.goNrecoeryNinnoationsNclean-renewable-
energy
+hitley, ;. 0&>. ime to c,ange t,e game< fossil fuel su+sidies and climate. Gondon, *KM
?erseas Deelopment 6nstitute.
+orld Cank 01.Involuntary #esettlement Source+ook. +ashington D7M The +orld Cank.
+orld Cank 0&B. 2orld 1evelopment Indicators< Electricity production9 sources9 and
access.Retrieed !rom httpMNNwdi.worldbank.orgNtableN>.=
+orld 7oal Association 0&1. 2,ere is Coal )ound3Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.worldcoal.orgNcoalNwhere-is-coal-!oundN
+orld %uclear Association 0&1. Supply of Uranium. Retrieed !rom httpMNNwww.world-
nuclear.orgNin!oN%uclear-Fuel-7ycleN*ranium-ResourcesN;upply-o!-*raniumN
8/10/2019 Nuclear Power: Irreplaceable before and after Fukushima
48/48
+orld %uclear Association 0&1a.Nuclear Power in Swit@erland. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.world-nuclear.orgNin!oN7ountry-Pro!ilesN7ountries-?-;N;wit"erlandN
+orld %uclear Association 0&1b. JClean CoalJ ec,nologies9 Car+on Capture "
Se>uestration. Retrieed !rom httpMNNwww.world-nuclear.orgNin!oN:nergy-and-
:nironmentN-7lean-7oal--TechnologiesN
+orld %uclear Association 0&1c. Safety of Nuclear Power #eactors. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.world-nuclear.orgNin!oN;a!ety-and-;ecurityN;a!ety-o!-PlantsN;a!ety-o!-
%uclear-Power-ReactorsN
+orld %uclear Association 0&1d.)ukus,ima Accident. Retrieed !rom httpMNNwww.world-
nuclear.orgNin!oN;a!ety-and-;ecurityN;a!ety-o!-PlantsNFukushima-AccidentN
+orld %uclear Association 0&1e.#adioactive 2aste 8anagement. Retrieed !orm
httpMNNworld-nuclear.orgNin!oN%uclear-Fuel-7ycleN%uclear-+astesNRadioactie-+aste-
& 0&0, .
Qhang, ;. 0&B. ,e plan for storing US nuclear waste Hust ,it a road+lock. Retrieed !rom
httpMNNwww.wired.comN0&BN=Nplan-storing-us-nuclear-waste-/ust-hit-roadblockN