Post on 23-Jul-2020
GB 15/112b
Page 1 Date of report: June 2015
Nottinghamshire Better Care Fund Finance and Performance Report
Reporting period: Month 1 (April) 2015/16
Contents
Performance Summary ......................................................................................................... 2
Finance Summary ................................................................................................................. 3
Key Messages ...................................................................................................................... 4
BCF1 - Total non-elective admissions in to hospital (general & acute), all-age, per 100,000 population ............................................................................................................................. 5
BCF2 - Permanent admissions of older people (aged 65 and over) to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population ..................................................................................... 9
BCF3 - Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement / rehabilitation services ......................................... 12
BCF4 - Delayed transfers of care (delayed days) from hospital per 100,000 population ...... 14
BCF5 - Patient / service user experience ............................................................................ 18
Disabled Facilities Grants ................................................................................................ 18
Health .............................................................................................................................. 19
BCF6 - Permanent admissions of older people (aged 65 and over) to residential and nursing care homes directly from a hospital setting per 100 admissions of older people (aged 65 and over) to residential and nursing care homes ........................................................................ 20
Finance ............................................................................................................................... 23
Disabled Facilities Grants – reports quarterly ...................................................................... 25
GB 15/112b
Page 2 Date of report: June 2015
Performance Summary
REF Indicator 2015/16 Target
2015/16 (to date)
RAG rating
and trend
BCF1 (pg 5)
Total non-elective admissions in to hospital (general & acute), all-age, per 100,000 population
2,371 (Q4
14/15)
2,562 (Q4
14/15)
R
BCF2 (pg 8)
Permanent admissions of older people (aged 65 and over) to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population
657.35 549
(15/16 YTD)
G
BCF3 (pg 10)
Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement / rehabilitation services
90.7% 92.0% (15/16 YTD)
G
BCF4 (pg 12)
Delayed transfers of care (delayed days) from hospital per 100,000 population (average per month)
1,151.4 (Q1
15/16)
531 (15/16 YTD)
G
BCF5 (pg 14)
Disabled Facilities Grant: % users satisfied adaptation meet needs
75%
98.8% (Q4
14/15)
G
BCF6 (pg 15)
Permanent admissions of older people (aged 65 and over) to residential and nursing care homes directly from a hospital setting per 100 admissions of older people (aged 65 and over) to residential and nursing care homes
33.96% 32.4% (15/16 YTD)
G
Key: Rating Thresholds Trend Meaning
G Improvement on baseline and target met
Performance from the last two data points indicates a positive direction of travel
A Improvement on baseline yet below target
Performance from the last two data points indicates no change
R Deterioration on baseline
Performance from the last two data points indicates a negative direction of travel
GB 15/112b
Page 3 Date of report: June 2015
Finance Summary
Month 1 2015/16 plan to
date
Variance to date
2015/16 full year
plan
Forecast variance
RAG rating and
trend
Nottinghamshire
Expenditure v budget 7,459 -1 58,922 0
G
Savings v forecast 153 -5 7,588 0
G
Units of Planning
North Nottinghamshire
Expenditure v budget 370 -10 5,078 0
G
Savings v forecast 16 -4 245 245
G
Mid-Nottinghamshire
Expenditure v budget 1,245 0 16,997 1
G
Savings v forecast 56 0 6,379 0
G
South Nottinghamshire
Expenditure v budget 1,131 0 13,567 0
G
Savings v forecast 80 0 965 -1
G
Pan Nottinghamshire
Expenditure v budget 4,713 0 23,280 0
G
Savings v forecast 0 0 0 0
Key:
Rating Thresholds Trend Meaning
G In line with plan. Costs are at or below budget or savings are at or above forecast.
Performance from the last two months indicates a positive direction of travel
R Below plan. Costs are above budget or savings are below forecast.
Performance from the last two months indicates no change
Performance from the last two months indicates a negative direction of travel
GB 15/112b
Page 4 Date of report: June 2015
Key Messages
REF Key issues for consideration Risk Mitigating actions
Performance
BCF1 (pg 5)
Overall performance above planned baseline. Data relates to 2015 calendar year and commencement of the pay for performance period.
R
Development on new pathways and professional roles including models of transfer to assess for targeted groups, Emergency Care Assistants in EMAS, Urgent Advice Lines/Clinic.
BCF2 (pg 8)
New target set as 12 week disregard now included in monitoring.
G N/A
BCF3 (pg 10)
Overall performance on target. However, denominator is reducing. G
Reviewing health commissioned reablement services with joint health and social care input.
BCF4 (pg 12)
Overall performance on target. G
N/A
BCF5 (pg 14)
Proxy indicators on target, with exception of latest GP survey result.
G N/A
BCF6 (pg 15)
CCG data now available.
G
Three Care & Support Centres will remain open for a longer period than planned to ultimately lead to an integrated Transfer-to-Assess model of provision.
Expenditure
Notts
Expenditure and savings are on plan. G
North
Expenditure broadly in line with plan. G
Telehealth pilot not rolled out as quickly as anticipated.
Mid
Expenditure and savings in line with plan. The Better Together programme has undertaken a full review of the programme during April and May. This work is being finalised and requires the sign off of both Governing Bodies.
G
The programme review changed the timeframe of schemes, bringing some schemes forward, e.g. implementation of IT systems, and delaying others, e.g. full mobilisation of the specialist intermediate care teams. Once this has concluded the CCGs will rephase BCF budgets. It is anticipated that this will be concluded in July and a paper setting out these changes will be brought to the Programme Board.
South
Expenditure and savings below plan. G
DFGs
Reported quarterly.
Pan Notts
Expenditure on plan. G
Key: Rating Thresholds
G No or Low Risk
A Medium Risk
R High Risk
GB 15/112b
Page 5 Date of report: June 2015
BCF1 - Total non-elective admissions in to hospital (general & acute), all-age, per 100,000 population
Planned Actual
Current RAG rating and trend
Baseline rate (Jan-14 to Dec-14)
Jan 14 - Mar 14 2,444
R
2,562 Q4 14/15
Apr 14 - Jun 14 2,546 2,577
Jul 14 - Sep 14 2,538 2,586
Oct 14 - Dec 14 2,547 2,643
Pay for Performance (Jan-15 to Dec-15)
Jan 15 - Mar 15 2,371 2,562
Apr 15 - Jun 15 2,425
Jul 15 - Sep 15 2,416
Oct 15 - Dec 15 2,432
Comments Monitored by CCG boards and System Resilience Groups
This data is provisional (national data published annually)
Please note the January to April 15 planned data for out of area CCGs is based on original submission data and may be subject to amendment.
The original BCF plans are being used pending NHSE clarification on whether to use revised 2015/16 operational plans.
Key issues Overall performance above planned baseline.
This target is reported on a calendar year basis. The planned reduction was not achieved for 2014.
Q4 2014/15 is the first quarter of the pay for performance period. The target was not delivered by any CCGs therefore no pay for performance is due.
Mitigating actions North Current performance
Plan figure is understated due to exclusion of readmissions within 28 days, whereas actual activity includes readmissions.
Increase in activity in A&E and external pressures with YAS being on reap 5 and Sheffield putting a divert in place to DBH.
There has been an increase in activity from Ollerton and Creswell. N&S CCG and North Derbyshire CCG are following this up.
ICB and SRG, and their related subgroups, are monitoring performance regularly.
Actions
CCG will continue to monitor contracts, and Systems Resilience Group will discuss the position and continue with the agreed unplanned care actions.
Short-term System Resilience funding utilised across the health and social care community to support non-elective activity. Winter learning event held in April to inform planning for winter 2015/16 and the systems resilience plan for NHSE.
Paramedic pathfinder implemented.
EMAS 3 month pilot for non-urgent care (green calls) and FRV protected resource in the Northern Corridor of Bassetlaw (Harworth area) completed February to April. Early indications of positive outcomes however no longer term funding identified.
Development of intermediate care and transfer to assess for
GB 15/112b
Page 6 Date of report: June 2015
Continuing Health Care patients pathways is ongoing. Transfer to assess for CHC patients initial trial and implementation of the interim intermediate care reablement model at James Hince Court planned for summer 2015.
Implementation of Emergency Care Assistants from EMAS.
Model of primary care urgent care in A&E being discussed with CCG and partners.
Clinical scenarios being identified to enable EMAS to admit directly to ATC.
Work commenced to develop falls pathway for implementation in April 2016.
Financial position Expenditure and savings broadly in line with plan. Mid Notts Current Performance A community-wide Operational Resilience Plan is in place. This is being overseen by the Health Community’s Urgent Care Working Group (UCWG) and the System Resilience Group (SRG). Actions Actions within the A&E Recovery Plan that relate to a reduction in non-elective admissions and length of stay include:
2 additional Acute Medical Consultants in place at SFHFT.
CHP presence in A&E to “turnaround” patients who can be dealt with by PRISM and in the community.
GP Referral Telephone Line whereby GPs telephone the SFHFT ED Consultant before sending any emergency admissions to the Trust. This is being discussed at the UCWG on 24th June to agree when this can be introduced for all practices.
GP 10-Minute Protocol between EMAS and GPs. EMAS ring a patient’s GP for advice when at the patient’s home, which could avoid an unnecessary admission. This is on-going, however, as yet we have no supporting information to evaluate the scheme. This is being taken forward with EMAS.
Expansion of 7-Day working within PRISM Teams to increase support within the community.
Review of PC24 streaming criteria carried out and live. The CCG has commissioned GP daytime presence in PC24 for another year following the successful pilot.
Continued use of technology to support patients to manage their health in the community (and not worsen and require admission) e.g. Use of FLO technology continues in the community (5 Nursing Homes in now successfully using FLO), Skype is being used in Stone Cross by Macmillan Nurses.
Joint working and communications across all organisations continues to work well. Joint learning events are being held.
SRG continues to meet fortnightly, supported by a fortnightly UCWG. Weekly teleconferences continue across health community. SFHFT GOLD command continue to attend internal bed meetings.
The 95% 4-Hour standard has been achieved at SFHFT for March, April & May months. However, SFHFT has been under
GB 15/112b
Page 7 Date of report: June 2015
pressure in June and the Health Community is working to alleviate the position.
South Current performance A system resilience tactical implementation plan is in place and is overseen by the System Resilience Implementation Group. CCG non-elective plans are also in place. Action
Practices engaged in a clinical audit process around admissions to identify a cohort that may be preventable.
Practice visits organised to discuss benchmarked activity rates of emergency admissions.
Re-promotion of Risk Stratification as a method to identify patients at risk of admission.
Development and Implementation of map of medicine in NNE CCG.
Weekend opening at Rushcliffe CCG continues to evaluate well and access to the clinic by care homes and community staff has been introduced.
Continual promotion of best use of the Urgent Care System to patients.
Continued implementation of the Nottingham Care Navigator and Urgent Advice Lines/Clinic at NUH.
The GP model in ED was trialled again during the May bank holiday. A report is awaited
NEMS have implemented a Community Pathfinder and Home Intervention Team (CPHIT) to support nursing homes on urgent care.
Performance against the ED standard remains above 95%.
A second Breaking the Cycle week is taking place at City Hospital campus from 17th June.
The Navigation work at NUH has been recognised as an area of good practice as part of the High Impact Interventions associated with improvements in emergency and urgent care. Work is being presented at regional SRG chairs event on 24th June.
Numerator All non-elective admissions into hospital (all ages)
Denominator Nottinghamshire resident population
Reporting Monthly, two months in arrears (targets quarterly). Low values are good.
Source Monthly activity return (MAR), NHS England.
GB 15/112b
Page 8 Date of report: June 2015
7,2866,357
7,282 7,035
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
Ad
mis
sio
ns
Total non-elective admissions in to hospital (general & acute), all ages for HWB population
Actual Planned baseline
908792
907 876
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
Un
sta
nd
ard
ise
d R
ate
pe
r 1
00
,00
0
Po
pu
lati
on
Total non-elective admissions in to hospital (general & acute), all ages per 100,000 HWB
population
Rate Planned baseline rate
Unit of planning CCG Planned
baseline
YTD
Actual
YTD
Notts HWB
actual
YTD
Notts HWB
rate
YTD
RAG and
trend
North Bassetlaw 3,433 4,112 4,013 3,620
Mansfield and
Ashfield 7,635 7,991 7,841 4,251
Newark and
Sherwood 4,076 4,439 4,332 3,407
Nottingham North
and East 4,097 4,633 4,414 3,109
Nottingham West 2,580 2,857 2,550 3,026
Rushcliffe 2,910 3,092 2,805 2,506
Total out of area 80,538 81,819 2,003 3,506
Total 105,269 108,943 27,959 3,419
Mid
South
GB 15/112b
Page 9 Date of report: June 2015
BCF2 - Permanent admissions of older people (aged 65 and over) to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population
Planned Actual Current RAG rating and trend
Baseline rate 651.2 April - March 2013/14
G
549 15/16 YTD
2014/15 Target
601.5 12 week disregard
583.1
N/A 705.9 Without 12 week disregard
2015/16 Target
599.8 12 week disregard
No longer monitored
657.35 Without 12 week disregard
Comments Monitored by Nottinghamshire County Council ASCH&PP and the Older Adults Delivery Group
Admissions’ reporting suffers from an input lag (where records of admissions are not updated in a timely manner). This means that admissions figures reported for a month may be updated in later months. This issue is being monitored.
This data is provisional (national data published annually).
Note: the provisional target for 2015/16 has increased due to a definition change which removes the 12 week disregard i.e. people admitted for a short stay. The target needs to be approved by the Programme Board.
Key issues RAG rating for CCGs will be provided when forecasting commences at end of Quarter 1.
Mitigating actions
Current performance Overall performance on track. Action The admissions targets that Group Managers work to have been reduced for the rest of the financial year and are being reviewed for 2015/16. This will ensure that we remain on target overall. Group Managers are reviewing admissions panel processes, which can differ between localities, in an effort to even out the number of admissions across localities and bring those localities that are not currently on target back in line. Work continues on the development and implementation of five new and one refurbished Extra Care schemes across the County, along with four proposed schemes. Extra Care housing is a real alternative to traditional long-term residential care and will help to deliver the NCC ambition that more older adults stay living in their own home environment safely for longer. The new schemes are scheduled to open throughout the next two years. Three Care & Support Centres have been identified to remain open for a longer period than was originally proposed to enable joint development
GB 15/112b
Page 10 Date of report: June 2015
of an intermediate care/ assessment / reablement type service that will ultimately lead to the implementation of an integrated Transfer-to-Assess model of provision. This will ensure timely discharges from hospital across the county and provide service users with the best support to enable them to return to their home, rather than entering residential care. This work is all being undertaken as part of the Better Care Fund within the three units of planning.
Numerator Permanent admissions of older people to residential and nursing care. An admission is a new admission, so does not include people transferring from one home to another or from residential to nursing. It does include people moving from temporary to permanent care.
Denominator Nottinghamshire resident population
Reporting Data is reported monthly, one month in arrears. Cumulative measure. Low values are good.
Source Nottinghamshire County Council, Frameworki internal report.
706549
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
549
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Baselineyear end
14/15
Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 YTD
Permanent admissions of older people to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population
Actual Target
Unit of
planningCCG
YTD
admissions
(Apr 15)
YTD rate
(Apr 15)
Target
rate
North Bassetlaw 12 52 583
Newark and Sherwood 6 22 529
Mansfield and Ashfield 14 41 703
Nottingham North and East17 58 563
Nottingham West 11 57 568
Rushcliffe 12 48 472
Mid
South
GB 15/112b
Page 11 Date of report: June 2015
52
22
4158 57
48
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Bassetlaw Newark andSherwood
Mansfield andAshfield
NottinghamNorth and East
Nottingham West Rushcliffe
North Mid South
Permanent admissions of older to residential and nursing care homes per CCG, per 100,000
population April 2015
Actual
GB 15/112b
Page 12 Date of report: June 2015
BCF3 - Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement / rehabilitation services
Planned Actual Current RAG rating and trend
Baseline rate 88.8 April – March 2013/14
G
92.0% 15/16 YTD
2014/15 Target
89.8 91.0
2015/16 Target
90.7
Comments Data reported three months in arrears due to indicator definition
Monitored by Nottinghamshire County Council ASCH&PP
This data is provisional (national data published annually).
Key issues Overall performance is above target. Small numbers and data validation (particularly in Bassetlaw) means that variation against target on a monthly basis can impact significantly on RAG rating. The target requires the denominator i.e. people receiving reablement/rehabilitation services to be maintained. The denominator has reduced significantly in Nottinghamshire as NCC has effectively monitored access to the services to ensure only eligible people are receiving them. For Nottingham West, NCC are in the process of broadening out the service which has been impacting on performance.
Mitigating actions Current performance Overall performance is on target, though the denominator is reducing. Action Ongoing monitoring of performance, particularly Nottingham West for service change. It is proposed that internally the data reporting is split to show the outcomes achieved for this indicator by Start Reablement and Intermediate Care schemes, since the data is currently merged. This may give us more useful intelligence about how these different services are being used and the outcomes they achieve. For example, the services may be taking on a high level of people with complex needs, to facilitate speedy hospital discharge, even though these people are not likely to achieve full rehabilitation 91 days after discharge. Work is ongoing to identify services commissioned by health with joint health and social care delivery that would be eligible to be included in the monitoring.
Numerator Number of people at home or in extra care housing or an adult placement scheme setting 91 days after the date of their discharge from hospital. People who are in hospital or in a registered care home at the three month date and those who have died within the three months are not included in the numerator.
GB 15/112b
Page 13 Date of report: June 2015
Denominator Older people aged 65 and over discharged from hospital to their own home or to a residential or nursing care home or extra care housing for rehabilitation, with a clear intention that they will move on/back to their own home. Rehabilitation includes START reablement and intermediate care in both community and residential settings.
Reporting Reported monthly, three months in arrears.
Source Nottinghamshire County Council, Frameworki internal report.
89% 90% 92%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
92%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Proportion of older people who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement / rehabilitation services
Actual Target
95% 95%
88% 88%92%
83%
76%78%80%82%84%86%88%90%92%94%96%98%
Bassetlaw Mansfield &Ashfield
Newark &Sherwood
NottinghamNorth and East
Nottingham West Rushcliffe
North Mid South
Proportion of older people who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement / rehabilitation services - CCG and Unit of
Planning split April 2015
Actual Target
Unit of Planning CCG Numerator Denominator Apr-15 RAG
North Bassetlaw 23 24 95.00%
Mansfield & Ashfield 95 100 95.12%
Newark & Sherwood 39 41 88.33%
Total Mid Notts 134 141 95.04%
Nottingham North and East 53 60 88.33%
Nottingham West 24 26 92.31%
Rushcliffe 30 36 83.33%
Total South Notts 107 122 87.70%
Mid
South
GB 15/112b
Page 14 Date of report: June 2015
BCF4 - Delayed transfers of care (delayed days) from hospital per 100,000 population
Planned Actual Current RAG rating
and trend
Baseline rate 2013/14
Apr 13 - Jun 13 1,250.8
G
531 15/16 YTD
Jul 13 - Sep 13 1,151.9
Oct 13 – Dec13 1,185.5
Jan 14 - Mar 14 1,203.1
2014/15 target
Apr 14 - Jun 14 1,218.1 1,209.9
Jul 14 - Sep 14 1,121.7 1,147.6
Oct 14 - Dec 14 1,185.0 982.6
Jan 15 - Mar 15 1,161.1 982.8
2015/16 target Apr 15 – Jun15 1,151.4
Jul 15 - Sep 15 1,121.4
Oct 15 – Dec15 1,173.3
Jan 16 - Mar 16 1,136.9
Comments Monitored by CCG boards and System Resilience Groups DBH data includes both the Bassetlaw and Doncaster hospital sites, which includes residents from both areas. Bassetlaw residents largely attend the Bassetlaw Hospital site (approx. two-thirds). Work is underway to separate out the DBH DTOCs for Notts residents only.
Key issues A difference around reporting between hospitals has been an issue during 2014/15. There was a change in SFHFT reporting in March 2015, but further work is required to ensure there is accurate reporting.
Mitigating actions
North Current performance Delayed discharges have decreased in April. On the whole, performance has been on track. ICB and SRG, and their related subgroups, are monitoring performance regularly. Actions
Hospital developments: o Redesigned Integrated Discharge Team has been
operationalised (Jan 2015) along with the implementation of the Trusted Assessor role to support discharge planning. Early indications are that this is working well.
o Weekly review of patients in hospital over 7 days is ongoing.
Community developments: o Homecare capacity is being addressed with NCC and
alternative options are being explored. o Development of intermediate care and transfer to assess for
Continuing Health Care patients pathways is ongoing. Work is underway to move the provision of residential intermediate care into James Hince Court for summer 2015.
Out of Area activity: o Meetings with out of area local authorities to develop pathways
to facilitate out of area complex discharges requiring social care input have taken place. Actions agreed and development of processes underway.
Financial position Expenditure and savings broadly in line with plan.
GB 15/112b
Page 15 Date of report: June 2015
Mid Notts Current performance The National DTOC Team met with key members of the Health Community on 13th March to review the level of DTOCs at SFHFT. One of the recommendations from the National Team was that SFHFT should review how they were counting and reporting DTOCs to the DoH and ensure that the Trust was consistent with the guidance. The Health Community is liaising with the NHSE to ask that SFHFT be a pilot site for the new definitional guidance that is due for release later this year. The Health Community continues to review processes to reduce all delays whether they are internal or reportable. The UCWG is taking this forward and reviewing schemes that could be implemented to reduce delays. Actions
The Health Community worked extremely well over the May Bank Holidays, putting in extra staff and processes across all organisations to ensure delays were kept to a minimum.
Transfer to Assess (T2A) continues. The scheme has been very successful and the CCG continues to commission this in 2015/16.
At SFHFT, daily Board Rounds by Senior Clinical Decision Makers continue.
The Multi-disciplinary Discharge Hub is working very well and continues to focus on patients who have been in hospital 14+ days.
Full utilisation of the Discharge Lounge.
The new discharge leaflet for patients has been finalised and agreed by the SRG. This will now be implemented. The leaflet will be given to patients on admission to clarify arrangements and avoid unnecessary delays.
Expansion of 7-Day working within PRISM Teams.
Joint working and communications across all organisations continues to work well. Joint learning events are being held.
The SRG continues to meet fortnightly, supported by a fortnightly UCWG. Weekly teleconferences continue across the health community. SFHFT GOLD command continue to attend internal bed meetings.
South Notts Current performance
The System Resilience Implementation Group continues to meet bi-weekly to review ED/System performance. A weekly dashboard position of indicators is produced which includes DTOC.
A Tactical Implementation Plan is in place to improve system resilience and is monitored by the System Resilience Group.
Actions
Steamlined discharge process at NUH for patients requiring support i.e. require health or social care services following admission.
A linked Social Worker for high referring wards is in place to ensure patients are identified for on-going needs assessments early in their admission and assessments can be completed in advance of the predicted medically safe date.
Transfer Action Group (TAG) is owned by individual directorates
GB 15/112b
Page 16 Date of report: June 2015
across NUH and meets weekly with community, CCG, acute and social care colleagues to discuss a prioritised list of long stay patients.
Leaving Hospital Policy: Social Care is escalating medically safe to transfer patients who have refused the offer of Interim care with health colleagues on a daily midday conference call.
Information Sharing Workstream: The clinical notes roll out is due to go live at the end of July 2015, with new style reporting to SRIG by Oct 2015. This will bring together DTOC information within the STOC
team and TAG meetings to provide real time visibility and consistency of information about a patient.
Daily discharge information is collected by both Health and Social Care colleagues within the acute and community settings and shared at conference calls throughout the day to aid visibility of capacity across the system. A discharge dashboard is being developed to enable SRIG and providers to compare data across the system to identify blockages.
A further “Breaking the Cycle” week for City Campus to take place 17th to 24th June. NCC offer includes: expediating care home discharges by working with home managers and extending direct referrals to START from all wards.
Early indications from Leivers Court assessment beds show promising results: 22 admissions over 6 weeks, average length of stay 13 days and 50% returned home who otherwise would have been placed in permanent care straight from hospital.
Co-location for SToC and social care teams at QMC is imminent to enable joint work and visibility/ accessibility of resource and capacity.
Length of stay variance between City and County social care to be analysed further to identify variances in practise, capacity and demand, recent issues with allocations given demand increasing but short-term funding for winter coming to an end.
7-day social care working for NUH in situ – arrangements being pursued to formalise and compliment this further to enable MDT coverage and access to resources over 7 days as well as admission avoidance.
Numerator Average delayed transfers of care (delayed days) (attributable to either NHS, social care or both) per month. A delayed transfer of care occurs when a patient is ready for transfer from a hospital bed, but is still occupying such a bed. A patient is ready for transfer when: (a) a clinical decision has been made that the patient is ready for transfer AND (b) a multi-disciplinary team decision has been made that the patient is ready for transfer AND (c) the patient is safe to discharge/transfer.
Denominator CCG registered population, per 100,000 population
Reporting Data is reported monthly, one month in arrears. Cumulative measure. Low values are good.
Source NHS England monthly reporting. Local data for narrative.
GB 15/112b
Page 17 Date of report: June 2015
1,210 1,148983 983
531
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
Q114/15
Q214/15
Q314/15
Q414/15
Q115/16
Q215/16
Q315/16
Q415/16
Un
stan
dar
dis
ed
Rat
e p
er
10
0,0
00
P
op
ula
tio
n
Quarterly Delayed transfers of care (delayed days) from hospital per 100,000 population: 2015/16
Actual Target
176
-
100
200
300
400
500
Un
stan
dar
dis
ed
Rat
e p
er
10
0,0
00
P
op
ula
tio
n
Monthly Delayed transfers of care (delayed days) from hospital per 100,000 population: 2015/16
Actual Target
290
3
316
1
51
101
151
201
251
301
Un
stan
dar
dis
ed
Rat
e p
er
10
0,0
00
P
op
ula
tio
n
Rate of Delayed Transfers of Care per 100,000 Population by provider 2015/16
NUH SFH DBH
GB 15/112b
Page 18 Date of report: June 2015
BCF5 - Patient / service user experience Only metrics where there is an update have been reported in this section.
Disabled Facilities Grants Percentage of users satisfied that the adaptations met their identified needs
Baseline rate None
2014/ 15 target N/A
2015/16 target 75%
Latest performance 98.8%
Q4 14/15
Key issues: Satisfaction levels with adaptations continue to be high.
Reporting Data is reported quarterly, one month in arrears. High values are good
Source Information provided by District and Borough Councils within Nottinghamshire
DFGs
completed
No of
customers
satisfied
% satisfiedDFGs
completed
No of
customers
satisfied
% satisfied
Bassetlaw 21 21 100% 68 68 100%
Total North Notts 21 21 100% 68 68 100%
Ashfield 31 31 100% 68 58 85%
Mansfield 21 19 90% 68 66 97%
Newark & Sherwood 21 21 100% 59 59 100%
Total Mid Notts 73 71 97% 195 183 94%
Broxtowe 18 18 100% 47 47 100%
Gedling 36 36 100% 101 101 100%
Rushcliffe 14 14 100% 53 53 100%
Total South Notts 68 68 100% 201 201 100%
Overall customer
satisfaction
2014/15 year end
97.4%98.8%
Qtr 4 14/15
GB 15/112b
Page 19 Date of report: June 2015
Health
Friends and Family Test (% recommended): April 2015 Data relates to inpatient Trust activity
Nottingham University Hospitals
Sherwood Forest Hospitals
Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals
Latest performance
96%
97%
94%
Reporting Data is reported monthly, one month in arrears. High values are good
Source NHS England monthly reporting
GB 15/112b
Page 20 Date of report: June 2015
BCF6 - Permanent admissions of older people (aged 65 and over) to residential and nursing care homes directly from a hospital setting per 100 admissions of older people (aged 65 and over) to residential and nursing care homes
Planned Actual Current RAG rating and trend
Baseline rate 65.0 April – March 2012/13
R 32.4% 15/16 YTD
2014/15 target 38.2 April – March 2013/14
35.1
2015/16 target 34.5 April – March 2014/15
37.3
2016/17 target 33.96 April – March 2015/16
Comments 2013/14 denominator is provisional (national data published annually and subject to timelag).
This data is provisional.
CCG data now available as using actuals rather than sampling.
Key issues Overall performance off target. The 2016/17 provisional target relates to delivery in 2015/16 due to the time delay in reporting verified data. The target needs to be approved by the Programme Board.
Mitigating actions Action Work is under way looking at various models, e.g. transfer to assess which should reduce the number of admissions direct from hospital next year. Social Care across the county are due to introduce a new panel process to scrutinise applications into long term care from hospital settings. Work continues on the development and implementation of five new and one refurbished Extra Care schemes across the County, along with four proposed schemes. Extra Care housing is a real alternative to traditional long-term residential care and will help to deliver the NCC ambition that more older adults stay living in their own home environment safely for longer. The new schemes are scheduled to open throughout the next two years. Three of our Care & Support Centres have been identified to remain open for a longer period than was originally proposed to enable joint development of an intermediate care/ assessment / reablement type service that will ultimately lead to the implementation of an integrated Transfer-to-Assess model of provision. This will ensure timely discharges from hospital across the county and provide service users with the best support to enable them to return to their home, rather than entering residential care.
Numerator Admissions to long-term residential and nursing care from an acute setting
Denominator Admissions to residential and nursing care as in BCF2
Reporting Quarterly, one month in arrears. Low values are good.
GB 15/112b
Page 21 Date of report: June 2015
Source Nottinghamshire County Council, Frameworki internal report.
65.0%
35.1% 37.3%32.4%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
32.4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Baseline(year end
12/13)
Year end13/14
Year end14/15
Apr - Jun 15 Jul - Sep 15 Oct - Dec 15 Jan - Mar 16 Year to Date
Permanent admissions of older people to residential and nursing care homes directly from a hospital (April 15)
Actual Target
32%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar
Percentage of admissions into care homes directly from hospital by month (April 15)
Target
17%33% 29% 24%
36%
58%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Bassetlaw Newark andSherwood
Mansfield andAshfield
NottinghamNorth East
NottinghamWest
Rushcliffe
North Mid South
Permanent admissions of older people to residential and nursing care homes directly from hospital by CCG (April 15)
Year to date Target
GB 15/112b
Page 22 Date of report: June 2015
79.1%
43.6% 52.4%42.3%
55.5%
30.5% 39.7%27.1%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 YTD
Permanent admissions of older people to residential and nursing care homes directly from a hospital (April 15)
Nursing Residential Average Target
GB 15/112b
Page 23 Date of report: June 2015
Finance The table below shows planned expenditure to date against actual expenditure and the forecast full year effect for the current year, 2015/16.
Plan £,000 Actual
£,000
Variance
£,000 Plan £,000
Forecast
£,000
Variance
£,000
A - Seven Day Working CCG £ 125 £ 125 £ - £ 1,500 £ 1,500 £ -
B - GP Access CCG £ 145 £ 145 -£ 0 £ 1,743 £ 1,743 £ -
C - Proactive and Personal ised
Care CCG £ 206 £ 206 £ 0 £ 2,471 £ 2,471 £ -
C - Proactive and Personal ised
Care NCC £ 11 £ 11 -£ 0 £ 135 £ 135 £ -
D - Community Care Co-
ordination CCG £ 189 £ 189 £ 0 £ 2,265 £ 2,265 £ -
D - Community Care Co-
ordination NCC £ 10 £ 10 -£ 0 £ 124 £ 124 £ -
E - Support for Carers NCC £ 43 £ 43 £ 0 £ 511 £ 511 £ -
E - Support for Carers CCG £ 21 £ 21 -£ 0 £ 256 £ 256 £ -
G - Rehabi l i tation/
Reablement Services - at
home and Community Bed
based
CCG £ 233 £ 233 -£ 0 £ 2,797 £ 2,797 £ -
G - Rehabi l i tation/
Reablement Services - at
home and Community Bed
based
NCC £ 18 £ 18 £ 0 £ 215 £ 215 £ -
H - Additional Support to
Socia l CareNCC £ 33 £ 33 -£ 0 £ 400 £ 400 £ -
I - Transformation CCG £ 96 £ 96 £ 0 £ 1,150 £ 1,150 £ -
K Loca l i ty Integrated Care
Teams CCG £ 594 £ 594 £ 0 £ 11,000 £ 8,405 -£ 2,595
L - Sel f Care Service CCG £ 7 £ 7 £ 0 £ 160 £ 580 £ 420
M - Specia l i sed Integrated
Care Teams CCG £ 345 £ 345 £ 0 £ 3,066 £ 4,143 £ 1,077
N - Improved Primary Care
Access and Support Closer to
Home
CCG £ 113 £ 113 -£ 0 £ 1,734 £ 1,501 -£ 233
O - Better Together
Implementation Support CCG £ 186 £ 186 -£ 0 £ 937 £ 2,237 £ 1,300
P - Communications £ - £ - £ - £ 100 £ 132 £ 32
Q - Neighbourhood Teams and
7 Day Access To Services £ 40 £ 40 £ - £ 825 £ 825 £ -
R - Mental Health Lia ison £ 35 £ 35 £ - £ 415 £ 415 £ -
U - Discharge/Assessment
incl . Intermediate Care £ 227 £ 227 £ - £ 2,918 £ 2,918 £ -
V - Respite Services £ 27 £ 27 £ - £ 325 £ 325 £ -
W - Improving Care Home
Qual i ty £ - £ - £ 100 £ 100 £ -
X - Telehealth £ 41 £ 31 -£ 10 £ 495 £ 495 £ -
F - Protecting Socia l Care
Services £ 1,347 £ 1,347 -£ 0 £ 16,167 £ 16,167 £ -
J - Disabled Faci l i ties Grant £ 3,204 £ 3,204 £ - £ 3,204 £ 3,204 £ -
Y - Socia l Care Capita l £ - £ - £ - £ 1,964 £ 1,964 £ -
Z - Care Act Implementation £ 162 £ 162 -£ 0 £ 1,945 £ 1,945 £ -
Total 7,459£ 7,448£ 11-£ 58,922£ 58,923£ 1£
South Nottinghamshire
North Nottinghamshire
Pan-Nottinghamshire
Mid-Nottinghamshire
To date (M1) Full year effect
GB 15/112b
Page 24 Date of report: June 2015
The table below shows forecast benefits to date against actual savings and the forecast full year effect for the current year, 2015/16.
Plan
£,000
Actual
£,000
Variance
£,000
Plan
£,000
Forecast
£,000
Variance
£,000
A - Seven Day Working £ 9 £ 9 -£ 0 £ 109 £ 109 -£ 0
B - GP Access £ 11 £ 11 £ 0 £ 130 £ 130 -£ 0
C - Proactive and Personal ised Care £ 11 £ 11 £ 0 £ 131 £ 131 £ -
D - Community Care Co-ordination £ 16 £ 16 £ 0 £ 190 £ 190 -£ 0
E - Support for Carers £ 4 £ 4 -£ 0 £ 49 £ 49 -£ 0
G - Rehabi l i tation/Reablement
Services - at home and Community £ 22 £ 22 -£ 0 £ 270 £ 270 £ 0
H - Additional Support to Socia l Care £ 0 £ - -£ 0 £ 1 £ 1 -£ 0
I - Transformation £ 7 £ 7 £ 0 £ 84 £ 84 £ 0
K Local i ty Integrated Care Teams £ 56 £ 56 £ 0 £ 2,797 £ 2,797 £ -
M - Specia l i sed Integrated Care
Teams £ - £ - £ 2,493 £ 2,493 £ -
N - Improved Primary Care Access and
Support Closer to Home £ - £ - £ 1,002 £ 1,002 £ 0
P - Communications £ - £ - £ 87 £ 87 £ -
W - Improving Care Home Qual i ty £ - £ - £ - £ 49 £ 49 £ 0
X - Telehealth £ 16 £ 12 -£ 4 £ 196 £ 196 £ 0
Total 153£ 148£ 5-£ 7,588£ 7,588£ 0£
North Nottinghamshire
Mid-Nottinghamshire
To date (M1) Full year effect
South Nottinghamshire
GB 15/112b
Page 25 Date of report: June 2015
Disabled Facilities Grants – reports quarterly
Comments Most local authorities have spent, or spent and approved, their BCF allocation for Disabled Facilities Grants at the end of the financial year. However, the overall spend on DFGs is less than predicted due to the fact that some authorities have made smaller contributions from their own capital than was originally budgeted.
Month 12 Actual
£,000
BCF allocation
2014/15
£,000
Year To
Date
Variance
£,000
Broxtowe £ 287 £ 303 £ 17
Gedl ing £ 371 £ 371 £ -
Rushcl i ffe £ 233 £ 233 £ -
Total South Notts £ 891 £ 907 £ 17
Ashfield £ 296 £ 374 £ 78
Mansfield £ 424 £ 483 £ 59
Newark and Sherwood £ 369 £ 369 £ -
Total Mid Notts £ 1,089 £ 1,227 £ 138
Bassetlaw £ 430 £ 430 £ -
Total North Notts £ 430 £ 430 £ -
South Nottinghamshire
North Nottinghamshire
Mid-Nottinghamshire