New approach in the management of proximally migrated stent with an obstructing anti-reflux valve

Post on 29-Nov-2016

213 views 0 download

Transcript of New approach in the management of proximally migrated stent with an obstructing anti-reflux valve

necrosis and perforation of the intestinal wall. The diagnosis of amebiccolitis rests on the demonstration of E. histolytica in the stool or colonicmucosa. The mainstay of treatment remains metronidazole, followed by aluminal agent (paromomycin, iodoquinol, or diloxanide furoate) to eradi-cate colonization. Amebic colitis rarely presents with continuous mucosalinflammation, making it indistinguishable from UC. Since the erroneousdiagnosis of UC can lead to disastrous complications, it is imperative toexclude amebic colitis prior to undertaking steroid therapy, especially inpatients with a prior history of travel to or residence in areas endemic forE. histolytica. Our case illustrates the need for high index of suspicion inimmigrants and visitors from developing world for amebiasis in the dif-ferential diagnosis of pancolitis.

651

NEW APPROACH IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PROXIMALLYMIGRATED STENT WITH AN OBSTRUCTING ANTI-REFLUXVALVESanjay Nayyar, M.D., Archana Verma, M.D., Benjamin T. Go, M.D.*,Gonzalo Pandolfi, M.D., Frida Abrahamian, M.D.,Bashar M. Attar, M.D. Cook County Hospital, Chicago, IL.

Esophageal cancers are usually diagnosed at a late stage requiring palliativetreatment. The use of self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) have pro-duced impressive results in improving dysphagia. Even with the increasinguse of SEMS, there are still complications. The most important includeesophageal perforation, hemorrhage, stent migration and fistulization. Weare reporting a case of proximal migration of SEMS with an antirefluxvalve (ARV) causing complete occlusion and management. The patient isa 60 year-old male who was diagnosed 4 weeks prior with an unresectablesquamous carcinoma of the distal esophagus at another hospital. An esoph-ageal Z-stent with dua ARV was placed. Patient presented to our hospital2 weeks after placement with inability to handle his secretions. EGDperformed showed the stent located from 20 to 32 cm, with completeobstruction by the ARV. Attempts to remove the stent were unsuccessfuldue to siginificant inflammatory reaction at the proximal end of the stentbut distal to the UES. A needle knife sphincterotome was used to carefullycut through the ARV to allow the passage of an ERCP catheter into thestomach. The ARV was then removed by piecemeal fashion with snareelectrocautery to allow deployment of a second SEMS. The tumor extendedfrom 34 to 41 cm with the GE junction at 40 cm and was dilated with a 12mm balloon. A 14 cm Z-stent with ARV was deployed through the firststent with the proximal end at 27 cm and the distal end at 41 cm.Post-procedure gastrograffin showed ideal stent placement with passage ofcontrast into the stomach. Patient was discharged after 2 days withoutcomplications. While most stent migrations occur distally, they can rarelymigrate proximally and be complicated by the ARV. In cases where thestent cannot be removed endoscopically, removal of the ARV can be donewith a snare electrocautery to allow deployment of a second stent. Thesame technique can be utilized with a double channel scope to shorten anARV after SEMS deployment.

652

GASTRIC NECROSIS: A COMPLICATION OF GASTRICBANDINGGerald Fruchter, M.D.*, Vlado Simko, M.D., Hatem Shoukeir, M.D.,Hueldine Webb, M.D., Ayse Aytaman, M.D. VA NY Harbor HCS,Brooklyn, NY.

Background: Morbid obesity is a growing health problem in the UnitedStates. Patients, who fail conservative measures at weight loss, are potentialcandidates for bariatric surgery. Current weight reduction surgery tech-niques include gastric restriction procedures, gastric bypass, and biliopan-creatic bypass. We report a rare, potentially lethal, complication of gastricbanding: gastric necrosis necessitating emergent laparotomy and gastrec-tomy.

Case Report: A 55 year-old male with history of morbid obesity presentedwith 5 days of epigastric pain, progressive dysphagia, and vomiting. He hadundergone a laparoscopic gastric banding 7 years prior with subsequentloss of 150lbs. Upon presentation, the patient was in no distress, weight187lbs with stable vital signs. Abdominal exam revealed a soft, non-distended abdomen with mild epigastric tenderness, no guarding or re-bound with a LUQ subcutaneous reservoir. The WBC was 9.2. CXR andabdominal films were unremarkable. Esophagogram showed marked con-striction at the level of the gastric band encircling the fundus with signif-icant hang-up of barium. On the second day of hospital stay, WBC rose to29.7; exam was unchanged. An abdominal CT scan was unrevealing exceptfor a left lung base infiltrate. Antibiotics were initiated. The following day,patient’s WBC rose to 35.2 with an unchanged exam. Upper endoscopyrevealed a distended proximal gastric pouch filled with coffee ground liquidand a large area of confluent ischemia covered by eschar as well as multiplesmall islands of ischemia. At surgery, there were multiple areas of necrosisin the serosal surface of the dilated fundus proximal to the strangulatingring as well as evidence of peritonitis. The stomach contained over 3 litersof sloughed gastric lining. A near total gastrectomy with roux-en-y gas-trojejunostomy was performed. Pathological exam revealed transmuralhemorrhagic necrosis of the fundus with marked thinning and impendingperforation. The patient had an uneventful post-op course.Discussion: Bariatric surgery is effective in treating morbid obesity. Forgastric banding, revision is occasionally needed to address gastric slippage,stenosis, as well as stomal obstruction. In our case, gastric banding inducedstrangulation with resultant full-thickness gastric necrosis and peritonitis.Clinicians involved in management of patients who undergo bariatricsurgery need to be aware of the potentially serious consequences inherentin this form of surgery.

653

SUPRAGLOTTIC LARYNGEAL STENOSIS-A RAREEXTRAESOPHAGEAL MANIFESTATION OF GERDSailaja M. Cheruku, M.D., John O’Brien, M.D.*, Carl Malone, M.D.Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL.

A 60 year-old caucasian female admitted to hospital for progressive, severeshortness of breath, over the past 2–3 weeks. She was sleeping upright ina chair secondary to orthopnea. She has no history of recent fever or acuteillness. Past medical history included chronic heart burn, hypertension andobesity. She denied tobacco, alcohol and illicit drug use. She took over thecounter antacids for heart burn. On exam, she had audible inspiratorystridor and room air oxygen saturation was 80%. An urgent transnasalfiberoptic laryngoscopy showed inability to visualize true vocal cords anda large 23 cm mass along the right aryepiglottic fold extending back toposterior commissure completely obstructing the view of her glottis. Theimpression was supraglottic mass obstructing the air way. She underwentemergency tracheostomy and direct laryngoscopic biopsy of the mass.Histology showed severe inflammation with granulation tissue and noevidence of malignancy. Laboratory evaluation of anti nuclear antibody,anti neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody and angiotensin converting enzymelevels were normal. Her sedimentation rate was 22. A CT Scan of neckshowed normal appearance of true vocal cords and severe supraglotticstenosis. In consideration of acid reflux induced ulceration, an upperendoscopy was performed, which demonstrated a hiatal hernia, normalesophagus, stomach and duodenum. She was given Pantoprazole twicedaily and discharged home to follow up as out patient, as her post operativecourse was uneventful. Ten weeks after treatment with pantoprazole, shewas evaluated with videostroboscopy and fiberoptic nasopharyngolaryn-goscopy, which demonstrated significant decrease in supraglottic swellingand inflammation. She denied any episodes of acid reflux. Despite discus-sions regarding surgery for acid reflux, the patient declined surgery. She iscurrently taking once a day pantoprazole. The Plan is to do supraglotticlaryngectomy and removal of tracheostomy tube. Common otolaryngologicmanifestations of GERD include cough, sore throat, hoarseness, laryngitis,chronic sinusitis, vocal cord nodules, globus, subglottic stenosis and rarely

S216 Abstracts AJG – Vol. 98, No. 9, Suppl., 2003