Post on 06-Apr-2017
National Environmental Policy Act OverviewRiver Management SocietyDenver, ColoradoApril 15, 2014
1
NEPA History
• Events of the 1940s, 1950s, 1960s paved the way for passage
• Passed by Congress December 23, 1969• Signed by President Richard Nixon January 1,
1970
2
NEPA
• Prevent or eliminate damage to the environment• Create/maintain harmony between people and
the environment• Understand ecological systems and natural
resources• Establish a Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ)
3
NEPA Mandates
• Integrated interdisciplinary approach• Natural and social sciences and environmental
design arts• Ensures that the environment is given consideration in planning and decision making• Disclosure/informed decisions• Public involvement 4
NEPA Implementation
• Law• CEQ Regulations (apply to all)• Agency regulations (both Departmental level and
individual agencies)• Agency policies• Agency handbooks• Regional/local procedures
5
NEPA
• The courts have found ~ nothing in NEPA prohibits “unwise decisions” only “environmentally uninformed” decisions
• Other laws may impose more substantive environmental obligations
6
Major Federal Actions
• New and continuing• Activities• Funding• Permits
• Categories of activities• Plans• Policies• Programs• Projects
7
Significance
• Context• Society as a whole• Regional• local
• Intensity• Severity of impacts• Degree of controversy• Uncertainty of impacts• Cumulative impacts• Cultural resources, endangered species
0
5
10
15
20
25
Perc
ent o
f Vis
itors
1-5
6-10
11-1
516
-20
21-2
5
26-3
0
31-3
5
36-4
041
-45
46-5
0
51-5
5
56-6
0
>60
Miles
8
Significance
• Defined by thresholds• Policy or law• Science• Decision maker’s opinion (politics, public pressure, personal
beliefs)
9
NEPA Documents
• 3 Primary NEPA Documents:• Categorical Exclusions (CEs or CATEXs)• Environmental Assessments (EAs)• Environmental Impact Statements (EISs)
10
Categorical Exclusions (CE/CATEX)
• CEQ § 1508.4
• A proposed action qualifies for a CE/CATEX:
• When the action would not individually or cumulatively cause a significant impact on the human environment.
• Matches a category in the Agency’s list of CEs/CATEXs in their published NEPA Regulations.
• No extraordinary circumstances could occur.
11
• Effect historic resources (NRHP)
• Impact ESA listed or proposed species
• Violates a federal, state, or tribal law
• Effects environmental justice• Limits access to Indian
sacred sites or affects the integrity of the site
• Contributes to introduction or spread of noxious/invasive weeds
• Public health or safety• Natural resources or
unique geographic characteristics (e.g., recreation, wetlands, wilderness)
• Highly controversial effects/unresolved conflicts
• High uncertainty ~ risk• Establish precedent• Cumulatively significant
Extraordinary Circumstances occur when a normally excluded action may have a significant effect on:
12
Environmental Assessment (EA)• CEQ § 1508.9
• A proposed action requires an EA if:• The proposed action is not eligible for a CE/CATEX• The proposed action probably would not cause significant,
adverse environmental effects
• Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)
13
Environmental Impact Statement
• CEQ § 1508.11
• A proposed action requires an EIS if:• The proposed action does not qualify for a CE/CATEX or
FONSI• The proposed action might cause significant, adverse
environmental effects (degradation of the environment or significant threat or hazard to public health or safety)
• Might have substantial environmental controversy concerning the significance or nature of the environmental impact of the proposed action
• Record of Decision (ROD) 14
3 Levels of Environmental Analysis and Documentation
• The main differences between an EA and EIS• An EIS tends to be more complicated resulting in higher cost
and a longer time commitment. • An EA ends in a FONSI; an EIS ends in a ROD• Generally, an EA has less public participation than an EIS. • The burden of proof, in the case of a lawsuit is different
between the two documents ~ an EA can be harder for an agency to defend.
15
NEPA
• 3 Primary Functions of NEPA Documents:• Provide sufficient information to the decision-
maker to make an informed decision• Provide that procedural requirements of NEPA
have been followed and completed• Informs the interested public
16
Suggested Content of an EIS/EA• CEQ § 1502.10 Recommended format.
• Cover sheet• Summary• Table of Contents• Purpose of and need for action• Alternatives including the proposed action• Affected environment• Environmental consequences• List of preparers• List of Agencies, Organizations, and persons to whom copies of
the statement are sent• Index• Appendices
17
EA/EIS Steps
• Purpose and Need• Identify Issues• Develop Alternatives• Evaluation Consequences• Public Review/Comment• Decision
18
Purpose and Need
• Who wants to do what, when, where• Need – the why• List project objectives• Scope of analysis (influence of laws, regulations,
other NEPA documents . . .)• Summarize decision(s) to be made
19
Identify Issues - Scoping
• Conflicts, threats, opportunities• Come from other government agencies, Native
Americans, and other concerned citizens• Federal agency’s analysis, literature, review and
IDT meetings• Purpose
• Determine actions• Alternatives• Impacts
20
Alternatives
• No action – no change from current situation• Proposed action• Include all reasonable alternatives – including
those not considered in detail• Explain why some alternatives not considered in
detail• Consider equally all alternatives considered in
detail
21
Affected environment
• Physical: soil, air, water• Biological: Plants, animal• Social: infrastructure, population, health, quality
of life, recreation• Economic: income, employment, cost of project
22
Environmental Consequences
• Effects on physical, biological, social, economic environment
• Change from implementing each alternative (including no action)
• Beneficial and adverse• Direct, indirect, cumulative
0102030405060708090100
2000 2005 2010 20150102030405060708090
County State Nation
23
Environmental Consequences
• Direct – same time and place• Indirect – distant in time or place or both• Cumulative –past actions, proposed action(s) and reasonably foreseeable future actions
24
Mitigation
• Ways to eliminate, reduce, compensate for adverse effects
• Can be used to reduce impacts from significant to non significant• Must be evaluated as part of an alternative• Measures only required if part of the decision
25
Public Review and Decision
• Type of review depends on document
• EA – review then finding of no significant impact and decision or go to EIS
• EIS – review of draft EIS, final EIS released and decision (Record of Decision)
26
FONSI
• Finding of No Significant Impact – end of EA process
• If there are significant impacts – EIS required
27
Record of Decision
• EIS – Record of Decision
28
Implementation & Monitoring
• 3 categories of monitoring• Implementation – did we do what we said we would do• Effectiveness – are things happening as we predicted? Is our
mitigation working as proposed?• Validation – reviews the assumptions we made during our analysis – may involve intensive data analysis and research
29
Proposed Federal Action
Categorical Exclusion Exists, and No Extraordinary
Circumstances Present
Internal Scoping
No Significant Environmental Effects
Significant Environmental Effects
NEPA Decision Making
Notice of Intent (NOI)
Environmental Assessment
Public Scoping*
Significance of Environmental Effects
Uncertain
Categorically Excluded from
Further Documentation
Environmental Action Statement
(EAS)**
Public Scoping
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Final EIS
Record of Decision (ROD)
* Public scoping for an EA is optional under 40 CFR 1500 et seq., but public involvement required under DOI NEPA regs., 43 CFR 46.305.
** Individual programs (e.g., WSFR, ES for HCPs, Partners Program) may require use of other forms ***FONSI is the FWS decision document for an EA, but not considered as such under NEPA regulations
Implementation
NOA & Comment Period
NOA & Waiting Period
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI)***
Significant Impacts
No Significant Impacts
OptionalPublic Scoping
30
Summary & Review
• Categorical Exclusion (CE, CatEx), Environmental Assessment (EA), Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
• Purpose & Need, Issues, Alternatives, Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, Mitigation
• Public Review & Comment• Decision – Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) or Record of Decision (ROD)• Implementation & Monitoring 31
Questions/Comments
32