Munehiko Yamaguchi 1 21 August 2014 (Thu.) Multi-model ensemble forecasts of tropical cyclones using...

Post on 30-Dec-2015

213 views 0 download

Tags:

Transcript of Munehiko Yamaguchi 1 21 August 2014 (Thu.) Multi-model ensemble forecasts of tropical cyclones using...

Munehiko Yamaguchi1

21 August 2014 (Thu.)

Multi-model ensemble forecasts of tropical cyclones

using TIGGE

World Weather Open Science Conference Montreal, Canada

Collaborators: Frederic Vitart2, Simon Lang2, Linus Magnusson2, Russell Elsberry3, Grant Elliott4, Masayuki Kyouda1,

Tetsuo Nakazawa5, Koji Kuroiwa5                       

1: Japan Meteorological Agency2: European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts

3: U.S. Naval Postgraduate School4: Bureau of Meteorology in Australia5: World Meteorological Organization

Outline

1. Introduction of TIGGEWhat is TIGGE?What is the benefit of using TIGGE?

2. Ensemble tropical cyclone activity predictionMotivation, Verification Methods, Results - Single model ensemble - Multi-model ensemble (e.g. Multi-centre grand

ensemble)3.Multi-center ensemble predictions for Hurricane Sandy, Cyclones Phailin and Typhoon Haiyan

4. Summary 5. Future directions

What is TIGGE?

Past

Present

Future

Research PhaseTIGGE (started 2006)

Cyclone XML (started 2008)

Goal: Enhanced use of ensemble prediction for operational purposes

Operational Phase

Various projects to demonstrate the value of ensemble prediction have been conducted.

North Western Pacific Tropical Cyclone (TC) Ensemble Forecast Project (NWP-TCEFP)Severe Weather Forecasting Demonstration Project (SWFDP)

What is the benefit of using TIGGE?

Past

Research PhaseTIGGE (started 2006)

Cyclone XML (started 2008)

MCGE

EPS at CMC

EPS at NCEP EPS at

JMA

EPS at ECMWF

EPS at XXX

TIGGE makes it possible to construct a new ensemble, that is Multi-Center Grand Ensemble (MCGE).TIGGE makes it possible to construct a new ensemble, that is Multi-Center Grand Ensemble (MCGE).

MCGE is an ensemble of ensembles of various NWP centers.

Track Prediction for Typhoon SOULIK (2013)

Blue portion of the tracks is the Day 1 forecast and the green, orange, and red portions are the Day 2, Day 3, and Day 4 forecasts.

Ensemble Size =

207

Black line is the observed track.The number on the black line indicates day(s) from the initial

date.

Track Prediction for Typhoon FITOW (2013)

Ensemble Size =

207

Typhoon SOULIK Init.: 2013.07.08 12UTC

Typhoon FITOW Init.: 2013.10.03 12UTC

What is the benefit of using MCGE?

MCGE products provide forecasters with additional information on the forecast uncertainty and increase the level of confidence in the forecast.

MCGE products provide forecasters with additional information on the forecast uncertainty and increase the level of confidence in the forecast.

Systematic verification of MCGE

The relative benefits of MCGE over single model ensemble (SME) are investigated from both deterministic and probabilistic perspectives. 58 TCs in the western North Pacific from 2008 to 2010 are verified.

The relative benefits of MCGE over single model ensemble (SME) are investigated from both deterministic and probabilistic perspectives. 58 TCs in the western North Pacific from 2008 to 2010 are verified.

1. TC strike probability Reliability is improved in MCGE, especially in the high-probability range. MCGE reduces the missing area by about 10 %.

2. Confidence information When multiple SMEs simultaneously predict the low uncertainty, the confidence level increases and a chance to have a large position error decreases.

3. Ensemble mean track prediction The position errors of 5-day predictions by the MCGE-3 are slightly smaller than that of the ensemble mean of the best SME although the difference is not statistically significant.

Yamaguchi, M., T. Nakazawa, and S. Hoshino, 2012: On the relative benefits of a multi-centre grand ensemble for tropical cyclone track prediction in the western North Pacific, Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc., 138, 2019-2029.

NWP-TCEFP website

Main Page (http://tparc.mri-jma.go.jp/cyclone/login.php)

MRI/JMA operates a website of NWP-TCEFP where the MCGE products of TC tracks are available.

Send e-mail to thorpex@mri-jma.go.jp to get ID and password

Ensemble tropical cyclone activity prediction

Frequency of days from TC genesis to the landfall

-Japan-

Days

Freq

uenc

y (%

)

Courtesy of Hirose and Fudeyasu (Yokohama National Univ.)

Frequency of days from TC genesis to the landfall

-Philippines-Courtesy of Hirose and Fudeyasu

(Yokohama National Univ.)

Days

Freq

uenc

y (%

)

Motivation• TC genesis and subsequent track forecasts are important from

a perspective of early warnings. Such forecasts would be particularly important for countries located in the lower latitude where a lead time from TC genesis to the landfall is relatively short.

• Although the performance of ensemble TC predictions has been studied well, the verification samples are usually limited to prediction cases where TCs exist at the initial times (i.e. TC strike probability prediction).

• There are few studies that verify TCs created during the model integrations on the medium-range time scale (i.e. TC genesis and subsequent track prediction).

Methodology 1/2• TC activity (i.e. TC genesis and subsequent track ) ensemble

forecasts from short- to medium range time scales (0 – 14 days) are verified at each TC basin below.

ecp atlwnpninsin aus spc

• The latitude is limited up to 25 ˚N or S to focus on TC activity in the lower latitude.

• TC activity ensemble forecasts are verified within a 3 day time window, which is applied over a forecast length of 2 weeks.

• For the ensemble forecasts, the TIGGE data set from ECMWF, JMA, NCEP and UKMO is used. The initial time is 12 UTC only.

• As the forecast length of JMA is day 9, verification for JMA is up to a time window of 6 – 9 days.

Day0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

……

Methodology 2/2

Example: TC activity probability maps -Haiyan-

Observation (0 or 100%)

• Initial time of the forecasts: 2013/10/31 12 UTC (about 4 days before the genesis and 8 days before the landfall over the Philippines)

• Time window: 2013/11/05 12 UTC – 2013/11/08 12 UTC (T+5days – T+8days)

Climatological TC activity of this initial time and this forecast time window

TC activity probability maps

A threshold distance of 300 km is used to determine whether observed or forecast TCs affect a grid point.

Verification Metric• Brier skill scores (BSS) for each time window at each basin are

calculated.

• Verification period is January to December (June) in 2010 to 2013 for the basins in the northern (southern) hemisphere.

• Verified TCs are those with a tropical storm intensity or stronger (35 knots or stronger).

• Threshold wind values of 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35 knots are tested to define model TCs.

• In plotting the brier skill scores, a brier skill score giving the best performance among the 5 threshold values is selected for each NWP center and for each time window.

• The best track date to create daily climatological TC activity is as follows. Basin Data Source Period

atl NHC 1949-2009

ecp NHC 1949-2009

aus JTWC 1985-2009

sin JTWC 1985-2009

spc JTWC 1985-2009

nin JTWC 1981-2009

wnp JMA 1951-2009

Climatological TC activity

Result - Intercomparison-

Red: ECMWF, Blue: JMA, (up to 9 days), Yellow: NCEP Green: UKMOX axis: time window, Y axis: brier score (larger is better)

ecp atlwnpninsin aus spc

Example: North Atlantic, Time window 6-9 daysInitial time of the forecasts: 2010/09/09 12 UTC

1 day after the genesis of Hurricane IgorApproximately 3 days before the genesis of Hurricane JuliaApproximately 5 days before the genesis of Hurricane Karl

KarlIgor Julia

Sensitivity to the definition of model TCsReliability DiagramBasin: ecpTime window: 2-5 daysNWP: UKMO

35 knots35 knots 30 knots

25 knots 20 knots 15 knots

Forecast probabilityO

bs. F

requ

ency y=x

Obs > FcstObs > Fcst

Obs < FcstObs < Fcst

Result -Relative benefit of MCGE 1/2-

ecp atlwnpninsin aus spc

Left: BSS of the best NWP center(Red: ECMWF, Blue: JMA, (up to 9 days), Yellow: NCEP Green: UKMO)

Middle: MCGE3Right: MCGE4 (up to 9 days)

Result -Relative benefit of MCGE 2/2-

Reliability is improved in MCGEReliability is improved in MCGE

Reliability DiagramBasin: ausTime window: 4-7 days

MCGE4

Forecast probabilityO

bs. F

requ

ency y=x

Obs < FcstObs < Fcst

images are taken from wikipedia and bbc.co.uk

Hurricane Sandy, Cyclone Phailin and Typhoon Haiyan

Hurricane Sandy (2012)

Init: 2012/10/22 12UTC Init: 2012/10/24 12UTC

Init: 2012/10/26 12UTC Init: 2012/10/28 12UTC

Cyclone Phailin (2013)

Init: 2013/10/09 12UTC

Init: 2013/10/05 12UTC Init: 2013/10/07 12UTC

Init: 2013/10/11 12UTC

Typhoon Haiyan (2013)

Init: 2013/11/02 12UTC

Init: 2013/11/06 12UTCInit: 2013/11/04 12UTC

Init: 2013/10/31 12UTC

Summary

• For TC track forecasts, MCGE products provide forecasters with additional information on the forecast uncertainty and increase the level of confidence in the forecast.

• TC activity predictions are evaluated using TIGGE data from ECMWF, JMA, NCEP and UKMO.• Brier Skill Scores (BSSs) in wnp, ecp and atl basins are relatively

larger than other basins and BSS is positive in week 2 forecasts in these basins.

• ECMWF has the largest BSS among the 4 centers in general.• MCGE is more skillful than the single-model ensemble in general

and the reliability is improved in MCGE.

• For recent high-impact TCs, Hurricane Sandy, Cyclones Phailin, and Typhoon Haiyan, MCGE predicted the landfall with high-confidence at least 5 days before the landfall.

TIGGE has made a great contribution to examine a new type of ensemble forecasting, that is, multi-center ensemble forecasting. The utility of such ensemble products has been confirmed through various research and forecasting demonstration projects (e.g., NWP-TCEFP and Sever Weather Forecasting Demonstration Project (SWFDP)) under the support of WMO. We should continue such efforts to promote the use of multi-center ensemble products in operational TC forecasting.

Future directions 1/3

Future directions 2/3According to Chan (2010), since Chan et al. (2002) paper, research on the physics of general TC motion has been almost non-existent, which suggests that most scientists are quite content with the current theories of TC motion. In reality, however, significant prediction errors still exist and there are prediction cases where the position error can exceed 1000 km over 3 days. Although the theories of TC motion might have reached a satisfactory level, our knowledge on the sources of prediction errors is still poor. Identifying the sources of large prediction errors and modifying NWP systems accordingly are of great importance to further improve our ability in forecasting TCs.

Typhoon Megi initiated at 1200 UTC 25th Oct. 2010

Observed track

Typhoon Conson initiated at 1200 UTC 12th Jul. 2010

MCGE-9 (BOM, CMA, CMC, CPTEC, ECMWF, JMA, KMA, NCEP, UKMO)

Future directions 3/3Although the performance of TC forecasts has been studied well, the verification samples are usually limited to forecast cases where TCs exist at the initial times. Our knowledge on the performance in forecasting TC genesis and the subsequent track on a medium-range time scale is limited. TC genesis and subsequent track forecasts are important from a perspective of early warnings. Such forecasts would be particularly important for countries located in the lower latitudes.

Thank you for your attention

Supplementary slides

Case Study: Typhoon SON-TINH (2012)Black dots: detected ensemble storms from all ensemble members