Post on 18-Dec-2015
TOS, hr
Alk
ylat
eY
ield
,%
0 2 4 6 8 100
10
20
30
40
50
Egg ShellEgg WhiteEgg Yolk
Bronsted Site Distribution
TOS, hr
Alk
ylat
eY
ield
,%
0 3 6 9 12 150
15
30
45
60
75
P/ O = 5P/ O = 10P/ O = 20
TOS, hr
Alk
ylat
eY
ield
,%
0 2 4 6 8 100
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
410.25
22
24 /
TOS, hr
Alk
ylat
eY
ield
,%
0 9 18 27 36 450
10
20
30
40
50
Predicted YieldExperimental Yield
TOS, hr
Co
nve
rsio
n,%
0 9 18 27 36 450
20
40
60
80
100
Predicted ConversionExperimental Conversion
Table 1: Input parameters for model simulations
OSV 1, kg/ kgcat-hr Feed P/ O ratio 5 Si/ Al ratioa 15
catR 3 x 10-4, m
cat a 937, m3/ kgcat
liq a 450, m3/ kg
s b 1
cat 0.48
cat 2 2
1 900 22 12 23 1 24 46 25 2 26 2
a de Jong et al. (1996); b Sarsani (2007)
TOS, hr
Dim
ensi
on
less
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n
0 2 4 6 8 100
0.035
0.07
0.105
0.14
0.175
n-buteneisooctanesisooctenes
C12H24S – C20H40S
C4H8 + S C4H8S
+ C4H8
C8H16S + i-C4H10
C8H18 Isomerized C8H18
TMP 100 RON
DMH 71 RON
+ nC4H8 + i-C4H10
C12H26 – C20H42 C5H12 – C7H14
60 – 93 RON
Cracked Products
Low Temperature
Minor
Minor
Minor
Low
Isobutane/ Olefin Ratio
High
90 RON
Contact Time Low High
High
Modeling of Key Reaction Pathways; Zeolite Catalyzed Alkylation Processes
Subramanya V. Nayak, Palghat A. Ramachandran, Milorad P. Dudukovic Chemical Reaction Engineering Laboratory (CREL), Center for Environmentally Beneficial Catalysis (CEBC)
Department of Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis
Solid acids (Zeolites) are heterogeneous catalysts that can replace conventional
liquid catalysts like HF and H2SO4
Examples: Butane to Octane (LPG to Gasoline) Synthetic Detergent (Linear alkyl benzene)Advantages: Non-corrosive and environmentally friendly Simple separation and recoveryChallenge:
Develop and demonstrate an environmentally friendly and competitive Solid Acid Catalyst (SAC) technology to conventional technologies
Introduction
Alkylation processes catalyzed by zeolites
Brønsted acid sites in a zeolite
Simplified alkylation mechanism (Roeseler, 2004)
ObjectiveTo model the key reaction pathways affecting the
performance of zeolite catalyzed alkylation of isobutane and n-butene.
Six lump Kinetic Model
Model assumptions:1.Protonation and addition of lighter olefins on the zeolite Brønsted acid site to form isooctenes can be treated as effectively the same reaction step.2.Hydride transfers between different isomers of isooctenes and isobutane and the direct alkylation between different lighter olefins and isobutane can be treated as effectively the same reaction step.3.C5 to C7 hydrocarbons formed by alkylation reactions are ignored.4.Alkylates formed are considered to collectively represent all the isomers of isooctanes.5.Once C12 carbocation is formed, the Brønsted acid site is irreversibly blocked, causing zeolite deactivation .6.Highly branched paraffinic hydrocarbons formed by addition of isooctanes and olefins causes further decrease in catalyst activity.7.Dimers formed by isomerization of isooctenes, irreversibly adsorb to the Brønsted acid site to further decrease the zeolite activity. 8.Cracking of the heavier hydrocarbon is ignored as it is not prevalent under alkylation conditions.
Key Reaction Pathways
SHCSHCHC k 16884841
SHCSHCHC k 188841043
SHCSHCHC k241284168
4
SHCSHCHC k261284188
5
SHCSHC k168168
6
SHCHCSHCHC k 841881041682
Alkylation Reactions
Deactivation Reactions
Transient Reactor and Zeolite Particle Models
E-1as Framework of Beta Zeolite
Si/ Al = 15 CSTR Zeolite Particle
Crystal
Remarks:• Transient reactor model considers residence time distribution.• Transient zeolite particle model considers reaction, diffusion and deactivation. • Reactor model and zeolite particle model are coupled using film transport.• Detail model equations and solution procedure is explained elsewhere (Nayak et al., 2008).
Results and Discussions
Protonation & Addition
Hydride Transfer
Direct Alkylation
Oligomerization
Alkylation
Isomerization
H
O
Si Al+
Base Case
Predicted dimensionless concentration of n-butene, isooctane and isooctenes as a function of
TOS for the base case simulation (refer to Table 1 for input parameters).
Remarks:• It is observed that ultimately complete n-butene breakthrough is reached with TOS, due to complete deactivation of the zeolite catalyst.
Validation of kinetic and reactor models
Comparison of TOS dependent olefin conversion predicted by the model and that
observed under experimental conditions (OSV = 0.11 kg/ kgcat-hr, P/ O = 5;
Sarsani, 2007).
Remarks: The steep decrease in olefin conversion predicted by model is because of following:• It is assumed that once C12 carbocation is formed the Brønsted acid site is irreversibly blocked, causing zeolite catalyst deactivation. However under experimental conditions it seems that the C12 carbocation further oligomerizes with butene, causing the slower decline of olefin conversion with TOS observed in the experimental data.
..............87843416842412 kk HCSHCHCSHC
• The beta zeolite used in the experiment contains both Brønsted and Lewis acid sites (Sarsani, 2007). Lewis acid sites do not catalyze the alkylation reaction, but the presence of strong Lewis acid sites promotes the formation of unsaturated compounds by butene reactions.• The model did not account for the additional reactions promoted by the catalyst that did not lead to the desired product as these reactions should be suppressed on the well designed catalyst.
Remarks:• Good agreement of model predictions with the experimental data is not obtained, with less than 5 % absolute error between predicted yield and experimental data.•This can be taken as proof that the model indeed captured the key reactions responsible for the production of alkylate and for the catalyst deactivation.•The slow drop in the alkylate yield is caused by intraparticle diffusion limitation in the zeolite pores.
Comparison of TOS dependent alkylate yield predicted by the model and that observed under
experimental conditions. (OSV = 0.11 kg/ kgcat-hr, P/ O = 5; Sarsani, 2007)
Influence of Design and Operating Parameters
Hydride Transfer and Oligomerization
Remarks:• The hydride transfer step between isooctenes and isobutane is sterically more hindered than olefin oligomerization.• Steric effect can be mitigated to a certain extent by attaching the acid group to a tether and extending it away from the support surface.• By adding an efficient hydride donor to the zeolite, the intrinsic rate of hydride transfer can be increased.
Simulated alkylate yield as a function of TOS for various values of 2
224 /
Isobutane/ n-butene ratio (P/ O)
Remarks:• A high feed P/ O ratio is beneficial for performance of zeolite catalyzed alkylation processes.• To maintain a high P/ O ratio in the reactor bulk, a back mixed reactor (slurry reactor) is more beneficial than a plug flow reactor (packed bed reactor). • However with an increase in P/ O ratio, the cost associated with separation and recycling the unreacted isobutane also increases.
Simulated alkylate yield as a function of TOS for various P/ O ratios
Optimal Brønsted Acid Site Distribution
Egg Shell Egg White Egg Yolk
Remarks:• In egg shell type of distribution, butene diffuses through a finite intraparticle space to reach the Brønsted acid sites. As a result, the P/ O ratio in the intraparticle space is much higher than in the bulk.• Alkylates formed in this thin shell can easily diffuse out to the bulk.
Simulated alkylate yield as a function of TOS for different types of Brønsted acid site distributions
Silicon/ Alumina RatioRemarks:• The decrease in Si/ Al ratio increases the initial Brønsted acid site concentration. As a result, the alkylate yield and zeolite catalyst life increase with a decrease in the Si/ Al ratio.
Summary1. Hydride transfer between isooctenes and isobutane and
oligomerization of isooctenes with olefins are the key reactions affecting the overall performance of zeolite catalyzed alkylation processes.
2. A slow rate of hydride transfer compared to oligomerization is the major cause of the low alkylates yield and shorter zeolite activity with time on stream (TOS).
3. To further enhance the science of zeolite catalyzed alkylation processes, we need to examine the consequences of zeolite morphology on the diffusion and reaction pathways of the organic molecules.
References:• de Jong, K.P., Mesters, C.M.A.M., Peferoen, D.G.R., van Brugge, P.T.M. and de Groote, C., (1996). Paraffin alkylation using zeolitie catalysts in a slurry reactor: Chemical engineering principles to extend catalyst lifetime. Chem. Eng. Sci. 51, 2053.• Nayak S.V., Ramachandran P. A., Dudukovic M. P., (2008) “Modeling of Key Reaction Pathways; Zeolite Catalyzed Alkylation Processes” submitted Chem. Eng. Sci. • Roeseler, C., (2004). UOP Alkylene™ Process for motor fuel alkylation. 3rd ed., Handbook of Petroleum Refining Processes, • Sarsani, V.S.R., (2007). Solid acid catalysis in liquid, gas-expanded liquid and near critical reaction media: Investigation of isobutane/ butene alkylation and aromatic acylation reactions. Ph D. Dissertation, University of Kansas.
Acknowledgements:This work is made possible by the support of the National Science Foundation (Grant EEC-0310689) and the Center for Environmentally Beneficial Catalysis (CEBC). Fruitful discussions with R.C. Ramaswamy, CREL, and S. Sarsani, U of Kansas were most appreciated.