Post on 19-Jan-2016
Mineralogical Evidence of Peoria Loess Addition to Soils of the Green Bay LobeShane Degen, Secondary Education & Peter Jacobs (mentor), Geography and Geology.
Typical thin loess mantle in south central Wisconsin. (representative photo)
90 cm Peoria Loess mantles
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the mineralogical evidence of loess addition to soils on the Green Gay Lobe surface; specifically we compare mineralogical properties of a soil with an obvious loess cap with those of a soil typically interpreted as being derived from glacial sediment.
Genge 1 SiteSoil with an obvious loess cap
Hake Drumlin SiteSoil lacking an obvious loess cap
Genge 1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
Fine Earth Cumulative Percent (+ CF)
Dep
th (
cm)
sand
clay
C. Frags
Particle fraction analysis by sieve and pipet. Note high silt content of loess-derived upper horizons that grade into the sandy glacial sediment, indicating mixing.
Quantification of clay mineral composition in the Hake profile. Expandable clay minerals are a distinctive signature of Peoria Loess and indicate much the chemical reactivity can be attributed to a loessial input to this soil.
Hake MgAD
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 20 40 60 80 100
Cumulative %D
epth
(cm
)
expandables illite kaolinite
We wish to acknowledge support for this research from the Provost’s Summer Research Scholars program, the UWW Undergraduate Research Program, and Dr. Joe Mason, UW-Madison for use of his laser particle size analyzer.
High resolution particle fraction analysis demonstrates a strong modal particle size in the silt fraction of the loess-derived horizons, and mixing with the glacial sediment.
Dodge County drumlin hillslope cross section. Note how major soil genetic horizon (Bt) thickness appears to be controlled by loess thickness as identified in the field. (■ = sampling sites)
Genge East Transect
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 20 40 60 80 100
Distance (m)
Ele
vatio
n (m
)
Base of loess
Base of Bt
Glacial sediment
Typical south central Wisconsin soil mapped as being derived from glacial sediment. (representative photo)
Hake
0
5
10
15
20
25
0.1 1 10 100 1000
Diameter (mm)
A 0-12cm
AE 12-18cm
E 18-35cm
BE 35-43cm
Bt1 43-53cm
Bt2 53-69cm
Bt3 69-80cm
BC 80-90cm
C 90-115+cm
High resolution particle fraction analysis demonstrates a strong modal particle size characteristics of loess is only in the uppermost horizons. Sand from the glacial sediment has been thoroughly mixed to the surface.
Hake VFS Weathering Ratio
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 5 10 15 20Ratio
De
pth
(c
m)
P/Q
K/Q
Ratios of weatherable to resistant minerals in the very fine sand fraction determined by x-ray diffraction. Ratios of potassium feldspar (K) to quartz (Q) are nearly uniform with depth, indicating no significant chemical weathering and depletion of potassium feldspars in the soil. Plagioclase feldspar (P) to quartz are more erratic, but do not indicate significant depletion of P. Minimal weathering of minerals that could supply clays indicate that loessial input of clays is critical to the ecosystem productivity of these soils.
Gathering samples in the field
stony glacial sediment
Expandable clay minerals are a signature of Peoria Loess across the midcontinent. (E = expandable, I = illite, K = kaolinite, and Q = quartz)
E
IK
Q
Loess derived horizon
Glacial sediment
Particle fraction analysis by sieve and pipet. Note high sand content throughout the soil, which soil surveyors interpreted to indicate the soil is derived from sandy glacial sediment.
Sand Silt Clay
Stack of x-ray diffractograms of clay fraction in all horizons of the Hake profile. Note high content of the expandable minerals throughout all soil horizons, indicating much of the critically reactive clay fraction in these soils can be attributed to loess input, even though the soil composition is dominated by sand from the glacial sediment.
E I K
Genge 1 profile clay fraction x-ray diffractograms. Note high content of the expandable minerals throughout all soil horizons, indicates much of the critically reactive clay fraction in these soils can be attributed to loess input, even into horizons dominated by sandy glacial sediment.
E I K