Post on 05-Jun-2020
MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, l 700 Convention Center Drive, Miomi Beach, Florido 3 Office of Internal Audi t Tel: 305-673-7020
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PERIOD(S) :
Jimmy L. Morales. City Manager
James J. Sutter, Internal Auditor MC
September 28, 2017
Ameresco Inc. - Annual Reconcil iation Reports Review
October 1, 2012 - September 30, 2016 (Power Consumption) January 1, 2011 - December 31 , 2016 (Water Consumption)
This report is the result of a Property Management Department request to review the four (4) Annual Reconciliation Reports (ARRs) submitted by Ameresco Inc. to date under their signed Energy Service Agreement with the City and to determine whether power and water savings when compared to the baseline are being realized.
INTRODUCTION
Ameresco Inc. (Ameresco) was founded in 2000 with the stated objective of providing energy efficiency and renewable energy solutions according to their website. On August 12, 2008 the City and Ameresco signed an Energy Audit Agreement to assess City owned and operated buildings to identify projections of energy and potential cost savings as a result of the installation of recommended energy conservation measures which consisted of more energy efficient devices and appliances, as well as the feasibility of implementing alternate energy generation projects. The Energy Audit Agreement would also help to develop an annual average consumption base to be used as comparison baseline in the Annual Reconciliation Reports or AR Rs.
On May 25, 2010 the Energy Service Agreement was adopted whereby Ameresco was to design, procure, fabricate, and install specified Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) and provide training, commissioning, maintenance and monitoring. The related capital improvements were procured between July 2010 and September 2012 at a cost of $13,697,733.97 and they were classified into the following six ECMs:
• ECM-1 Facility Lighting Upgrades - Installing energy efficient lights and fixtures. • ECM-3 Domestic Water Conservation - Installing water efficient toilets, faucets,
showerheads, sinks, ice machines, laundry facilities, etc. to reduce their consumption levels.
• ECM-5 HVAC Controls - (HVAC = Heating Ventilation & Air Conditioning) Installing new thermostats, controllers, sensors, low leak dampers, etc. that will be linked into one (1) energy management system and upgraded so that building monitoring and controls are more easily undertaken and energy conservation is achieved as a result.
• ECM-6 District Cooling Plant - New optimization panels and software, valves, water pumps, etc. to provide a geothermal source to enhance the efficiency of the cooling plant and to expand the cooling system to incorporate the distribution of chilled water to City Hall, the new multi-purpose City garage and eventually the 777 Building.
We ore committed to providing excellent public service ond sofeo/ lo oil who live. work. ond play In our vibront, tropical, historic community.
Internal Audit Memorandum Ameresco Inc. – Report Review Years 1 Through 4 September 28, 2017
Page 2 of 5
• ECM-7 Geothermal Cooling - Police – New heat exchangers, valves, pumps, etc. to increase the efficiency of the Police Department chilling mechanism thereby reducing energy consumption.
• ECM-10 Transformer Replacement – Replace to more efficient dry power transformers. Exhibit C of the Energy Service Agreement also stipulates that by the issuance of the Final Delivery and Acceptance Certificate which represents capital improvement project conclusion that the City is to remit an annual fee for maintenance savings measurement and verification, and post-acceptance training services. As a result, the City was to remit thirteen annual service and maintenance payments starting at $81,770 and increasing by 3% per year for a potential total of $1,277,069. By this report's date, service and maintenance fees of $338,168 were paid as shown in the table below:
Year Fiscal Year Check # Check Date Amount 1 10/01/12 - 09/30/13 355079 01/07/2014 $ 81,771 2 10/01/13 – 09/30/14 372861 03/31/2015 84,223 3 * 10/01/14 – 09/30/15 384415 12/22/2015 84,848 4 10/01/15 – 09/30/16 413876 05/11/2017 87,326
Total $ 338,168 * Amendment #1 to the Energy Service Agreement was entered into on March 4, 2016 which among other
items modified ECM-6 as Ameresco was to decommission the Geothermal System at its sole cost and expense so the maintenance charges were reduced starting in year 3 plus year 13’s payment was deleted. A listing of the updated service and maintenance fees for the duration of the agreement can be found in Exhibit D of Amendment #1. The City is contractually obligated to remit an additional eight (8) payments totaling an additional $799,836 over the remaining years of the Energy Service Agreement assuming that the savings objectives were satisfied.
According to information provided by one of their Operations Managers, Ameresco has measurement verification protocol that includes the use of statistical sampling techniques for baseline measurement and post-installation measurements of wattage per fixture to determine total energy savings. Ameresco guarantees savings in power, water, and operation and maintenance up to a certain amount each year and in the event of failure to achieve those savings, they will pay the City the difference between the annual amount guaranteed and the actual annual energy and operating cost savings achieved at the premises. All savings related totals to date have been based on assessments made by Ameresco which are recorded in their ARRs filed annually and they have received all the designated service and maintenance fees specified in the signed agreements and amendments. PURPOSE The purpose of this review is to determine whether monies spent in the Energy Service Agreement resulted in the City having lower annual power and water consumption for the tested locations and whether accurate Annual Reconciliation Reports were submitted reflecting the City’s consumption trends. SCOPE Analyze historic actual consumption data obtained from Florida Power & Light and the City’s Financial System for the selected City owned and operated buildings which were subsequently
Internal Audit Memorandum Ameresco Inc. – Report Review Years 1 Through 4 September 28, 2017
Page 3 of 5
compared to the corresponding data listed in Ameresco Inc.’s submitted Annual Reconciliation Reports. ANALYSIS PERFORMED Ameresco Inc. (Ameresco) properly filed the four (4) Annual Reconciliation Reports (ARRs) required to date under their signed Energy Service Agreement with the City. These ARRs estimate the power and water savings for City owned properties during each October through September fiscal year based on capital improvements costing $13,697,733.97 procured between July 2010 and September 2012. Internal Audit requested on several occasions the supporting documentation for the figures reported in these ARRs but Ameresco only furnished an Excel spreadsheet devoid of formulas which was not helpful. Attempts to compare Ameresco’s estimated savings to the actual consumption figures obtained from Florida Power & Light (FPL) and the City’s Financial System for the audit period were largely unsuccessful due to different reporting formats. Ameresco uses statistical sampling techniques to reach their totals rather than actual consumption. Furthermore, there may be unknown variables which could affect the consumption rates (building modifications, reduced/extended hours of operation, missing meter information, etc.) that would have to be reviewed individually to determine their existence. Lastly, Hurricane Irma impacted the South Florida area in September 2017 and made it difficult to attain additional information as FPL and Public Works Department employees’ time was focused on other more important tasks. Given these facts, Internal Audit could not determine whether the power and water consumption savings actually exceeded the associated costs of the capital improvements ($13,697,733.97) plus the annual service and maintenance payments designated in the Energy Service Agreement and amendment #1 ($1,138,004 = $338,168 paid to date + $799,836 potentially owed during the next eight years). Although other testing was conducted and their results are presented below and in the exhibits located at the end of this report, our primary objective was to obtain and analyze the consumption information for each selected location (26 for power and 24 for water) to help the Property Management Department Administration identify trends so that they could take any needed corrective actions. The following summarized tests were performed which produced the listed results: For power consumption analysis From a total population of 52 City owned and operated locations, 26 were selected for analysis whose power consumption totals were available in each of the four yearly ARRs. Upon request, FPL provided five (5) years of data, which was sorted by fiscal year (October 1st - September 30th) to match Ameresco’s ARR’s approach. Although both kilowatts per hour (kWh) and dollars were requested, FPL only provided kWh so any noted power differences could not be quantified as the corresponding rate was not constant since it increased as the property’s consumption increased. Exhibit A contains a comparison of these 26 locations actual power consumption for the 2012/13, 2013/14, 2014/15 and 2015/16 fiscal years with Ameresco’s calculated 2006 through 2008 baseline consumption. The calculated baseline for each of the locations listed in the Energy Service Audit measured the amount of consumption prior to the capital improvements and served as the benchmark to measure future potential savings. Testing found that the actual power consumption was higher than the baseline in 42 (9 in 2012/13, 10 in 2013/14, 11 in 2014/15 and 12 in 2015/16) of the 104 (26 locations x 4 years) instances tested or 40.38% of
Internal Audit Memorandum Ameresco Inc. – Report Review Years 1 Through 4 September 28, 2017
Page 4 of 5
the time. In addition, an analysis of the 26 locations actual power consumption was completed by fiscal year as shown in Exhibit B. The resulting linear trend analysis performed on an annual basis found that five (5) locations power consumption usage remained steady or 19% as the calculated slope fell within the +.01 and -.01 range. Of the remaining 21 locations, there was an upward trend indicating that more power was consumed than in the baseline for ten (10) or 39% locations and a downward consumption trend meaning less power was consumed for the remaining eleven (11) locations or 42%. These slope differences ranged from a maximum upward trend of .182 for the Bayshore Maintenance building located at 2800 North Meridian Avenue to a (.192) downward trend for the Recreation Center formerly located at 2100 Washington Avenue. Meanwhile, Exhibit C initially computes the variances or change in power consumption from the prior year for the data obtained from FPL and Ameresco for the same periods. These variances are netted together to determine the combined variance which was found to exceed 3% in 44 of the 78 tested calculations or 56% of the time which supports our earlier conclusion that Ameresco uses statistical sampling techniques to reach their totals rather than actual consumption. Schedule D calculates the percentage difference between FPL’s actual power consumption and the projected cost savings reported annually by location in Ameresco’s ARRs. It was determined that the corresponding difference exceeded 3% for 52 of the 104 tested transactions or 50%. Schedule E1 through E26 provides a dashboard of each tested location’s power consumption during the audit period by fiscal year. The supporting Excel pivot tables that drive these calculations were given to Property Management Department Administration so that they can continue this analysis going forward. This process will facilitate their monitoring especially since the consumption process is currently decentralized with various City departments/divisions authorizing FPL payments (Parks and Recreation, Fire, etc.). For water consumption analysis Unlike power, water savings were not itemized by location in the submitted ARRs, as they were instead presented globalized in a breakdown entitled "Domestic Water Conservation". Although no individual comparisons were possible, requests were made to the City’s Public Works Department for a listing of the meters that supply water to the 26 sampled power locations. Two (2) locations had to be excluded because no data was provided concerning their water consumption prior Hurricane Irma’s landfall in South Florida since the Public Works Department’s resources were focused on recovery efforts. Finally, Fire Station #2 and Fire Station Maintenance Facility were bundled together as no information could be obtained to segregate their water usage. Based on the data received from the Public Works Department, the relevant meters actual consumption was then captured from the City’s Financial System (keeping calendar year sorting) and entered into Excel pivot tables to facilitate analysis. As a result, testing focused on whether the actual water consumption remained steady, increased or decreased during the six year audit period as shown in Exhibit F. The resulting linear trend analysis performed on an annual basis found that one (1) location’s usage remained steady or 4% as the water consumption’s calculated slope during the reviewed fiscal years fell within the +.01 and -.01 range. Of the remaining locations, there was an upward trend indicating that more water was
Internal Audit Memorandum Ameresco Inc. – Report Review Years 1 Through 4 September 28, 2017
Page 5 of 5
consumed than in the baseline for thirteen (13) locations or 57% and a downward consumption trend meaning less power was consumed for the remaining nine (9) locations or 39%. Lastly, Exhibits G1 through G23 provide a dashboard of each tested location’s water consumption during the audit period by fiscal year. The supporting Excel pivot tables that drive these calculations were given to Property Management Department Administration so that they can continue this analysis going forward to facilitate monitoring. JJS:MC:NB Review performed by Assistant Internal Auditor Mark Coolidge and Senior Auditor Norman Blaiotta F:\OBPI\$AUD\INTERNAL AUDIT FILES\DOC16-17\REPORTS - FINAL\Ameresco Draft Report 09-28-17.docx cc: Mark Taxis, Assistant City Manager
Eric Carpenter, Assistant City Manager Adrian Morales, Property Management Division Director John Woodruff, Chief Financial Officer
FPL Data ‐ Ameresco Baseline Comparison Table Exhibit: A
Total kWh per Fiscal Year (FPL) Fiscal Year (Oct 1 through Sept 30)
Locations Baseline (See note 2013 2014 2015 2016
Bayshore Maintenance Building 91,069 54,310 62,921 91,844 113,613 Yes
City Hall 2,815,309 1,440,720 1,493,880 1,495,440 1,474,080 No
Colony Theater 800,520 703,200 788,880 885,840 888,480 Yes
Comfort Facility 14,458 31,533 29,732 26,193 16,924 Yes
Convention Center 18,421,360 6,509,120 6,242,752 6,442,892 6,355,360 No
Crespi Recreation Center 6,610 10,185 10,697 10,079 7,943 Yes
Fairway Park Recreation Center 10,380 50,714 47,843 53,115 62,916 Yes
Fire Station #1 242,370 261,420 264,720 262,020 243,960 Yes
Fire Station #2 458,723 828,360 682,920 672,060 748,980 Yes
Fire Station #3 201,102 191,760 201,660 215,820 227,280 Yes
Fire Station Maintenance Facility 121,135 91,812 103,562 104,227 102,346 No
Mechanical Maintenance/Sanitation 607,920 494,520 474,360 458,280 446,640 No
Muss Park Recreation Center 10,210 10,709 18,041 12,310 10,090 Yes
North Shore Community Center 150,009 115,855 112,378 123,987 117,425 No
Office Building (777) 742,880 680,320 687,360 728,640 665,120 No
Old City Hall 212,263 332,781 337,840 323,880 344,012 Yes
Parks Division, Nursery 114,101 116,973 130,228 111,462 119,870 Yes
Police Athletic League 461,565 288,720 352,440 384,540 345,360 No
Police Station 3,270,840 3,256,560 3,111,600 3,001,680 2,987,760 No
Recreation Center (21 Street) 339,120 121,920 139,800 142,800 29,520 No
Sailport/Police Substation 387,042 53,152 62,319 61,294 69,128 No
South Shore Community Center 516,360 487,080 470,880 421,200 383,520 No
Stillwater Park Recreation Center 19,930 9,995 9,016 12,092 10,828 No
Tatum Park Recreation Center 14,864 10,983 8,271 13,982 17,450 Yes
VCA Building (555) 419,840 576,000 511,440 423,120 434,280 Yes
Youth Center (Scott Rakow) 2,563,440 1,902,000 1,780,560 1,576,560 1,674,240 No
% of locations per year with consumption higher than
baseline (% of highlighted)40%
Note: Baseline amount is the Ameresco calculated consumption Count %
average for the years 2006 through 2008 for each listed location Yes 13 50%
No 13 50%
Total 26 100%
Percentage obtained by adding the 42 highlighted years
(9+10+11+12) which represent those with higher consumption than
baseline and dividing it by the total locations multiplied by the four
years analyzed 104 (26 x 4).
Test 1 ‐ Is Any of the FPL's Yearly kWh Totals
Higher Than the Baseline Amount?
Test 2
Locations per year with consumption higher than baseline:9 10 11 12 Total: 26
Test 1 Summary
Trend Analysis Summary Table ‐ FPL Data Only Exhibit: B
Total kWh per Fiscal Year (FPL) Fiscal Year (Oct 1st through Sept 30th)
Locations 2013 2014 2015 2016 Slope Trend
Bayshore Maintenance Building 54,310 62,921 91,844 113,613 0.182 Upward
City Hall 1,440,720 1,493,880 1,495,440 1,474,080 0.007 Steady
Colony Theater 703,200 788,880 885,840 888,480 0.073 Upward
Comfort Facility 31,533 29,732 26,193 16,924 (0.150) Downward
Convention Center 6,509,120 6,242,752 6,442,892 6,355,360 (0.004) Steady
Crespi Recreation Center 10,185 10,697 10,079 7,943 (0.069) Downward
Fairway Park Recreation Center 50,714 47,843 53,115 62,916 0.067 Upward
Fire Station #1 261,420 264,720 262,020 243,960 (0.021) Downward
Fire Station #2 828,360 682,920 672,060 748,980 (0.030) Downward
Fire Station #3 191,760 201,660 215,820 227,280 0.053 Upward
Fire Station Maintenance Facility 91,812 103,562 104,227 102,346 0.031 Upward
Mechanical Maintenance/Sanitation 494,520 474,360 458,280 446,640 (0.032) Downward
Muss Park Recreation Center 10,709 18,041 12,310 10,090 (0.042) Downward
North Shore Community Center 115,855 112,378 123,987 117,425 0.013 Upward
Office Building (777) 680,320 687,360 728,640 665,120 (0.001) Steady
Old City Hall 332,781 337,840 323,880 344,012 0.006 Steady
Parks Division, Nursery 116,973 130,228 111,462 119,870 (0.008) Steady
Police Athletic League 288,720 352,440 384,540 345,360 0.053 Upward
Police Station 3,256,560 3,111,600 3,001,680 2,987,760 (0.028) Downward
Recreation Center (21 Street) 121,920 139,800 142,800 29,520 (0.192) Downward
Sailport/Police Substation 53,152 62,319 61,294 69,128 0.068 Upward
South Shore Community Center 487,080 470,880 421,200 383,520 (0.074) Downward
Stillwater Park Recreation Center 9,995 9,016 12,092 10,828 0.046 Upward
Tatum Park Recreation Center 10,983 8,271 13,982 17,450 0.144 Upward
VCA Building (555) 576,000 511,440 423,120 434,280 (0.089) Downward
Youth Center (Scott Rakow) 1,902,000 1,780,560 1,576,560 1,674,240 (0.047) Downward
Total: 26
Trend Count %
Upward 10 39%
Downward 11 42%
Steady 5 19%
Total 26 100%
Note 1: Slope was calculated through Excel's regression analysis formula, SLOPE (Total kWh consumption,Year). Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range areconsidered steady. For all other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative numbers "( )" represent downward trends.
Yearly Variance Summary Table Exhibit: C
Location / Fiscal Year
A
Variance from Previous Year in
(FPL)
B
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
C
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (A‐B)
Is Ameresco's Variance Overstated
When Compared to FPL? (Apply for
Differences Over +/‐3 Percentage
Points)
Bayshore Maintenance Building
2013
2014 15.86% ‐3.97% 19.83 Yes
2015 45.97% 16.34% 29.63 Yes
2016 23.70% 10.78% 12.92 Yes
City Hall
2013
2014 3.69% 1.84% 1.85 No
2015 0.10% ‐5.33% 5.43 Yes
2016 ‐1.43% 7.10% ‐8.52 Yes
Colony Theater
2013
2014 12.18% 14.56% ‐2.37 No
2015 12.29% 13.01% ‐0.72 No
2016 0.30% ‐1.74% 2.03 No
Comfort Facility
2013
2014 ‐5.71% ‐11.31% 5.60 Yes
2015 ‐11.90% ‐19.42% 7.52 Yes
2016 ‐35.39% ‐29.83% ‐5.56 Yes
Convention Center
2013
2014 ‐4.09% ‐8.81% 4.72 Yes
2015 3.21% ‐0.56% 3.76 Yes
2016 ‐1.36% ‐0.49% ‐0.87 No
Crespi Recreation Center
2013
2014 5.03% 5.03% 0.00 No
2015 ‐5.78% ‐20.37% 14.59 Yes
2016 ‐21.19% ‐15.51% ‐5.68 Yes
Fairway Park Recreation Center
2013
2014 ‐5.66% ‐6.58% 0.92 No
2015 11.02% 5.16% 5.86 Yes
2016 18.45% 25.90% ‐7.45 Yes
Fire Station #1
2013
2014 1.26% 1.36% ‐0.10 No
2015 ‐1.02% ‐0.98% ‐0.04 No
2016 ‐6.89% ‐7.73% 0.83 No
Fire Station #2
2013
2014 ‐17.56% ‐4.39% ‐13.17 Yes
2015 ‐1.59% ‐8.36% 6.77 Yes
2016 11.45% 2.28% 9.17 Yes
Fire Station #3
2013
2014 5.16% ‐0.69% 5.85 Yes
2015 7.02% 0.55% 6.47 Yes
2016 5.31% 6.36% ‐1.05 No
Fire Station Maintenance Facility
2013
2014 12.80% 15.25% ‐2.45 No
2015 0.64% ‐12.76% 13.40 Yes
2016 ‐1.80% 14.13% ‐15.93 Yes
Mechanical Maintenance/Sanitation
2013
2014 ‐4.08% ‐30.33% 26.25 Yes
2015 ‐3.39% ‐4.42% 1.03 No
2016 ‐2.54% ‐3.35% 0.81 No
Muss Park Recreation Center
2013
2014 68.47% 47.56% 20.91 Yes
2015 ‐31.77% ‐35.50% 3.73 Yes
2016 ‐18.03% ‐12.57% ‐5.46 Yes
North Shore Community Center
2013
2014 ‐3.00% 1.84% ‐4.84 Yes
2015 10.33% ‐16.24% 26.57 Yes
2016 ‐5.29% 7.36% ‐12.65 Yes
Office Building (777)
2013
2014 1.03% 1.71% ‐0.67 No
Location / Fiscal Year
A
Variance from Previous Year in
(FPL)
B
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
C
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (A‐B)
Is Ameresco's Variance Overstated
When Compared to FPL? (Apply for
Differences Over +/‐3 Percentage
Points)
2015 6.01% 4.56% 1.45 No
2016 ‐8.72% ‐8.08% ‐0.64 No
Old City Hall
2013
2014 1.52% 2.85% ‐1.33 No
2015 ‐4.13% ‐11.38% 7.25 Yes
2016 6.22% 13.96% ‐7.74 Yes
Parks Division, Nursery
2013
2014 11.33% 11.08% 0.25 No
2015 ‐14.41% ‐22.94% 8.53 Yes
2016 7.54% 21.11% ‐13.57 Yes
Police Athletic League
2013
2014 22.07% 7.90% 14.17 Yes
2015 9.11% 3.62% 5.49 Yes
2016 ‐10.19% ‐23.98% 13.79 Yes
Police Station
2013
2014 ‐4.45% ‐4.55% 0.10 No
2015 ‐3.53% ‐3.55% 0.02 No
2016 ‐0.46% ‐0.98% 0.51 No
Recreation Center (21 Street)
2013
2014 14.67% 11.00% 3.67 Yes
2015 2.15% 5.46% ‐3.32 Yes
2016 ‐79.33% ‐81.87% 2.54 No
Sailport/Police Substation
2013
2014 17.25% ‐55.22% 72.47 Yes
2015 ‐1.64% 1.14% ‐2.78 No
2016 12.78% 19.25% ‐6.47 Yes
South Shore Community Center
2013
2014 ‐3.33% ‐2.90% ‐0.43 No
2015 ‐10.55% ‐9.38% ‐1.17 No
2016 ‐8.95% ‐8.82% ‐0.12 No
Stillwater Park Recreation Center
2013
2014 ‐9.79% ‐10.92% 1.12 No
2015 34.12% 13.26% 20.85 Yes
2016 ‐10.45% ‐3.59% ‐6.86 Yes
Tatum Park Recreation Center
2013
2014 ‐24.69% ‐27.48% 2.78 No
2015 69.05% 71.87% ‐2.82 No
2016 24.80% 22.36% 2.44 No
VCA Building (555)
2013
2014 ‐11.21% 4.71% ‐15.92 Yes
2015 ‐17.27% 11.81% ‐29.08 Yes
2016 2.64% ‐12.53% 15.17 Yes
Youth Center (Scott Rakow)
2013
2014 ‐6.38% ‐7.72% 1.33 No
2015 ‐11.46% ‐9.09% ‐2.37 No
2016 6.20% 4.92% 1.27 No
Total Variances Assessed 78
Total Yes Results 44
% From Total 56%
Yearly Total Consumption Summary Table Exhibit: D
Location / Fiscal Year A
Total Yearly Consumption (FPL)
B
Total Yearly Consumption (Ameresco)
C
% Difference Between FPL
and Ameresco Total
Consumption (B‐A)/B
Is Ameresco's Calculated Total Consumptio
Showing a Difference of Over a 3% Range
When Compared to FPL? (C Within +/‐
3%=No)
Bayshore Maintenance Building
2013 54,310 195,332 72.2% Yes
2014 62,921 187,573 66.5% Yes
2015 91,844 218,218 57.9% Yes
2016 113,613 241,749 53.0% Yes
City Hall
2013 1,440,720 1,430,520 ‐0.7% No
2014 1,493,880 1,456,800 ‐2.5% No
2015 1,495,440 1,379,220 ‐8.4% Yes
2016 1,474,080 1,477,080 0.2% No
Colony Theater
2013 703,200 694,080 ‐1.3% No
2014 788,880 795,120 0.8% No
2015 885,840 898,560 1.4% No
2016 888,480 882,960 ‐0.6% No
Comfort Facility
2013 31,533 32,702 3.6% Yes
2014 29,732 29,004 ‐2.5% No
2015 26,193 23,371 ‐12.1% Yes
2016 16,924 16,399 ‐3.2% Yes
Convention Center
2013 6,509,120 13,318,640 51.1% Yes
2014 6,242,752 12,144,692 48.6% Yes
2015 6,442,892 12,077,092 46.7% Yes
2016 6,355,360 12,017,844 47.1% Yes
Crespi Recreation Center
2013 10,185 10,185 0.0% No
2014 10,697 10,697 0.0% No
2015 10,079 8,518 ‐18.3% Yes
2016 7,943 7,197 ‐10.4% Yes
Fairway Park Recreation Center
2013 50,714 49,533 ‐2.4% No
2014 47,843 46,272 ‐3.4% Yes
2015 53,115 48,658 ‐9.2% Yes
2016 62,916 61,262 ‐2.7% No
Fire Station #1
2013 261,420 260,700 ‐0.3% No
2014 264,720 264,240 ‐0.2% No
2015 262,020 261,660 ‐0.1% No
2016 243,960 241,440 ‐1.0% No
Fire Station #2
2013 828,360 672,720 ‐23.1% Yes
2014 682,920 643,200 ‐6.2% Yes
2015 672,060 589,440 ‐14.0% Yes
2016 748,980 602,880 ‐24.2% Yes
Fire Station #3
2013 191,760 218,671 12.3% Yes
2014 201,660 217,173 7.1% Yes
2015 215,820 218,375 1.2% No
2016 227,280 232,264 2.1% No
Fire Station Maintenance Facility
2013 91,812 90,561 ‐1.4% No
2014 103,562 104,372 0.8% No
2015 104,227 91,052 ‐14.5% Yes
2016 102,346 103,914 1.5% No
Mechanical Maintenance/Sanitation
2013 494,520 694,080 28.8% Yes
2014 474,360 483,600 1.9% No
2015 458,280 462,240 0.9% No
2016 446,640 446,760 0.0% No
Muss Park Recreation Center
2013 10,709 11,927 10.2% Yes
2014 18,041 17,599 ‐2.5% No
2015 12,310 11,352 ‐8.4% Yes
2016 10,090 9,925 ‐1.7% No
North Shore Community Center
2013 115,855 224,906 48.5% Yes
2014 112,378 229,038 50.9% Yes
2015 123,987 191,842 35.4% Yes
2016 117,425 205,960 43.0% Yes
Office Building (777)
2013 680,320 683,360 0.4% No
2014 687,360 695,040 1.1% No
2015 728,640 726,720 ‐0.3% No
Location / Fiscal Year A
Total Yearly Consumption (FPL)
B
Total Yearly Consumption (Ameresco)
C
% Difference Between FPL
and Ameresco Total
Consumption (B‐A)/B
Is Ameresco's Calculated Total Consumptio
Showing a Difference of Over a 3% Range
When Compared to FPL? (C Within +/‐
3%=No)
2016 665,120 668,000 0.4% No
Old City Hall
2013 332,781 328,491 ‐1.3% No
2014 337,840 337,840 0.0% No
2015 323,880 299,391 ‐8.2% Yes
2016 344,012 341,176 ‐0.8% No
Parks Division, Nursery
2013 116,973 116,416 ‐0.5% No
2014 130,228 129,316 ‐0.7% No
2015 111,462 99,656 ‐11.8% Yes
2016 119,870 120,693 0.7% No
Police Athletic League
2013 288,720 217,643 ‐32.7% Yes
2014 352,440 234,832 ‐50.1% Yes
2015 384,540 243,324 ‐58.0% Yes
2016 345,360 184,979 ‐86.7% Yes
Police Station
2013 3,256,560 3,256,560 0.0% No
2014 3,111,600 3,108,480 ‐0.1% No
2015 3,001,680 2,998,080 ‐0.1% No
2016 2,987,760 2,968,800 ‐0.6% No
Recreation Center (21 Street)
2013 121,920 372,000 67.2% Yes
2014 139,800 412,920 66.1% Yes
2015 142,800 435,480 67.2% Yes
2016 29,520 78,960 62.6% Yes
Sailport/Police Substation
2013 53,152 439,317 87.9% Yes
2014 62,319 196,711 68.3% Yes
2015 61,294 198,947 69.2% Yes
2016 69,128 237,242 70.9% Yes
South Shore Community Center
2013 487,080 480,720 ‐1.3% No
2014 470,880 466,800 ‐0.9% No
2015 421,200 423,000 0.4% No
2016 383,520 385,680 0.6% No
Stillwater Park Recreation Center
2013 9,995 9,995 0.0% No
2014 9,016 8,904 ‐1.3% No
2015 12,092 10,085 ‐19.9% Yes
2016 10,828 9,723 ‐11.4% Yes
Tatum Park Recreation Center
2013 10,983 11,049 0.6% No
2014 8,271 8,013 ‐3.2% Yes
2015 13,982 13,772 ‐1.5% No
2016 17,450 16,852 ‐3.5% Yes
VCA Building (555)
2013 576,000 232,800 ‐147.4% Yes
2014 511,440 243,760 ‐109.8% Yes
2015 423,120 272,560 ‐55.2% Yes
2016 434,280 238,400 ‐82.2% Yes
Youth Center (Scott Rakow)
2013 1,902,000 1,894,080 ‐0.4% No
2014 1,780,560 1,747,920 ‐1.9% No
2015 1,576,560 1,589,040 0.8% No
2016 1,674,240 1,667,280 ‐0.4% No
Total Variances Assessed 104
Total Yes Results 52
% From Total 50%
Bayshore Maintenance BuildingExhibit: E1
Address: 2800 N MERIDIAN AVE # STATION Account Number(s): 1502442088 6201776025 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 54,310 24 195,332 72.2%
2014 62,921 24 15.86% 187,573 ‐3.97% 19.83 Yes 66.5%
2015 91,844 24 45.97% 218,218 16.34% 29.63 Yes 57.9%
2016 113,613 24 23.70% 241,749 10.78% 12.92 Yes 53.0%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: 0.182 Trend: Upward
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: 0.070 Trend: Upward
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for Bayshore Maintenance
Building differs significantly from FPL's provided consumption data
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): All three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports presented differences of over 3
percentage points when compared to FPL's previous year variances. FPL and Ameresco's variances can also be observed in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Both Ameresco and FPL's linear trends showed an upward slope.
Note: This is a multiple‐account location. Conclusions are based on the sum of all accounts.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐10.00%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 54,310 62,921 91,844 113,613
Amaresco's Consumption Data 195,332 187,573 218,218 241,749
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
City HallExhibit: E2
Address: 1700 Convention Center Drive Account Number(s): 6531179395 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 1,440,720 12 1,430,520 ‐0.7%
2014 1,493,880 12 3.69% 1,456,800 1.84% 1.85 No ‐2.5%
2015 1,495,440 12 0.10% 1,379,220 ‐5.33% 5.43 Yes ‐8.4%
2016 1,474,080 12 ‐1.43% 1,477,080 7.10% ‐8.52 Yes 0.2%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: 0.007 Trend: Steady
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: 0.004 Trend: Steady
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for City Hall does not differ
significantly from FPL's provided consumption data.
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): Two of the three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports (2015 & 2016) presented a
difference of over 3 percentage points when compared to previous year variance for FPL's data. FPL and Ameresco's variance differences can
also be observed in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Both Ameresco and FPL's linear trends fell within the steady range.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐6.00%
‐4.00%
‐2.00%
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 1,440,720 1,493,880 1,495,440 1,474,080
Amaresco's Consumption Data 1,430,520 1,456,800 1,379,220 1,477,080
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
Colony TheaterExhibit: E3
Address: 1040‐1050 Lincoln Road Account Number(s): 5899713118 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 703,200 12 694,080 ‐1.3%
2014 788,880 12 12.18% 795,120 14.56% ‐2.37 No 0.8%
2015 885,840 12 12.29% 898,560 13.01% ‐0.72 No 1.4%
2016 888,480 12 0.30% 882,960 ‐1.74% 2.03 No ‐0.6%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: 0.073 Trend: Upward
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: 0.075 Trend: Upward
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for Colony Theatre does not
differ significantly from FPL's provided consumption data.
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): None of the three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports presented a difference of
over 3 percentage points when compared to previous year variance for FPL's data. FPL and Ameresco's variance differences can also be
observed in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Both Ameresco and FPL's linear trends showed an upward slope.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐4.00%
‐2.00%
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
14.00%
16.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 703,200 788,880 885,840 888,480
Amaresco's Consumption Data 694,080 795,120 898,560 882,960
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
Comfort FacilityExhibit: E4
Address: 4621 Collins Avenue Account Number(s): 4384431351 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 31,533 12 32,702 3.6%
2014 29,732 12 ‐5.71% 29,004 ‐11.31% 5.60 Yes ‐2.5%
2015 26,193 12 ‐11.90% 23,371 ‐19.42% 7.52 Yes ‐12.1%
2016 16,924 12 ‐35.39% 16,399 ‐29.83% ‐5.56 Yes ‐3.2%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: (0.150)Trend: Downward
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: (0.167)Trend: Downward
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for Comfort Facility does not
differ significantly from FPL's provided consumption data.
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): All three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports presented differences of over 3
percentage points when compared to FPL's previous year variances. FPL and Ameresco's variances can also be observed in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Both Ameresco and FPL's linear trends showed a downward slope.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐40.00%
‐35.00%
‐30.00%
‐25.00%
‐20.00%
‐15.00%
‐10.00%
‐5.00%
0.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 31,533 29,732 26,193 16,924
Amaresco's Consumption Data 32,702 29,004 23,371 16,399
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
Convention CenterExhibit: E5
Address: 1901 CONVENTION CENTER DR Account Number(s): 9072176432 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 6,509,120 12 13,318,640 51.1%
2014 6,242,752 12 ‐4.09% 12,144,692 ‐8.81% 4.72 Yes 48.6%
2015 6,442,892 12 3.21% 12,077,092 ‐0.56% 3.76 Yes 46.7%
2016 6,355,360 12 ‐1.36% 12,017,844 ‐0.49% ‐0.87 No 47.1%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: (0.004)Trend: Steady
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: (0.030)Trend: Downward
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for Convention Center differs
significantly from FPL's provided consumption data.
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): Two the three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports (2014 and 2015) presented a
difference of over 3 percentage points when compared to previous year variance for FPL's data. FPL and Ameresco's variance differences can
also be observed in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Ameresco's linear trend shows a downward slope against a steady trend showed from FPL. This represents
a higher consumption trend (unfavorable) to the City than the one shown by Ameresco.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐10.00%
‐8.00%
‐6.00%
‐4.00%
‐2.00%
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 6,509,120 6,242,752 6,442,892 6,355,360
Amaresco's Consumption Data 13,318,640 12,144,692 12,077,092 12,017,844
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
Crespi Recreation CenterExhibit: E6
Address: 7800 Crespi Road Account Number(s): 6411182584 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 10,185 12 10,185 0.0%
2014 10,697 12 5.03% 10,697 5.03% 0.00 No 0.0%
2015 10,079 12 ‐5.78% 8,518 ‐20.37% 14.59 Yes ‐18.3%
2016 7,943 12 ‐21.19% 7,197 ‐15.51% ‐5.68 Yes ‐10.4%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: (0.069)Trend: Downward
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: (0.104)Trend: Downward
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for Crespi Rec Center did not
differ for the first two years and slightly differs in the last two years when compared to FPL's provided data.
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): Two of the three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports (2015 & 2016) presented a
difference of over 3 percentage points when compared to previous year variance for FPL's data. FPL and Ameresco's variance differences can
also be observed in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Both Ameresco and FPL's linear trend showed a downward slope.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐25.00%
‐20.00%
‐15.00%
‐10.00%
‐5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 10,185 10,697 10,079 7,943
Amaresco's Consumption Data 10,185 10,697 8,518 7,197
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
Fairway Park Recreation CenterExhibit: E7
Address: 200 FAIRWAY DR Account Number(s): 3909220380 5888420220 8977477192 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 50,714 36 49,533 ‐2.4%
2014 47,843 36 ‐5.66% 46,272 ‐6.58% 0.92 No ‐3.4%
2015 53,115 36 11.02% 48,658 5.16% 5.86 Yes ‐9.2%
2016 62,916 36 18.45% 61,262 25.90% ‐7.45 Yes ‐2.7%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: 0.067 Trend: Upward
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: 0.061 Trend: Upward
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for Fairway Park Recreation
Center does not differ significantly from FPL's provided consumption data.
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): Two of the three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports (2015 & 2016) presented a
difference of over 3 percentage points when compared to previous year variance for FPL's data. FPL and Ameresco's variance differences can
also be observed in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Ameresco and FPL's linear trend showed an upward slope.
Note: This is a multiple‐account location. Conclusions are based on the sum of all accounts.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐10.00%
‐5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 50,714 47,843 53,115 62,916
Amaresco's Consumption Data 49,533 46,272 48,658 61,262
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
Fire Station #1Exhibit: E8
Address: 1051 Jefferson Avenue Account Number(s): 7527175355 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 261,420 12 260,700 ‐0.3%
2014 264,720 12 1.26% 264,240 1.36% ‐0.10 No ‐0.2%
2015 262,020 12 ‐1.02% 261,660 ‐0.98% ‐0.04 No ‐0.1%
2016 243,960 12 ‐6.89% 241,440 ‐7.73% 0.83 No ‐1.0%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: (0.021)Trend: Downward
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: (0.023)Trend: Downward
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for Fire Station #1 does not
differ significantly from FPL's provided consumption data.
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): None of the three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports presented a difference of
over 3 percentage points when compared to previous year variance for FPL's data. FPL and Ameresco's variance differences can also be
observed in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Both Ameresco and FPL's linear trends showed a slightly downward slope.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐9.00%
‐8.00%
‐7.00%
‐6.00%
‐5.00%
‐4.00%
‐3.00%
‐2.00%
‐1.00%
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 261,420 264,720 262,020 243,960
Amaresco's Consumption Data 260,700 264,240 261,660 241,440
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
Fire Station #2Exhibit: E9
Address: 2300 PINE TREE DR #ADMIN Account Number(s): 2355237302 7224725536 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 828,360 24 672,720 ‐23.1%
2014 682,920 24 ‐17.56% 643,200 ‐4.39% ‐13.17 Yes ‐6.2%
2015 672,060 24 ‐1.59% 589,440 ‐8.36% 6.77 Yes ‐14.0%
2016 748,980 24 11.45% 602,880 2.28% 9.17 Yes ‐24.2%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: (0.030)Trend: Downward
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: (0.039)Trend: Downward
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for Fire Station #2 differs
significantly (particularly in 2013 and 2016) from FPL's provided consumption data.
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): All three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports presented differences of over 3
percentage points when compared to FPL's previous year variances. FPL and Ameresco's variances can also be observed in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Both Ameresco and FPL's linear trends showed a slightly downward slope.
Note: This is a multiple‐account location. Conclusions are based on the sum of all accounts.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐20.00%
‐15.00%
‐10.00%
‐5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 828,360 682,920 672,060 748,980
Amaresco's Consumption Data 672,720 643,200 589,440 602,880
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
Fire Station #3Exhibit: E10
Address: 5305 Collins Avenue Account Number(s): 2538675378 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 191,760 12 218,671 12.3%
2014 201,660 12 5.16% 217,173 ‐0.69% 5.85 Yes 7.1%
2015 215,820 12 7.02% 218,375 0.55% 6.47 Yes 1.2%
2016 227,280 12 5.31% 232,264 6.36% ‐1.05 No 2.1%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: 0.053 Trend: Upward
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: 0.018 Trend: Upward
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for Fire Station #3 does not
differ significantly (except for 2013) from FPL's provided consumption data.
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): Two of the three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports (2014 and 2015) presented
differences of over 3 percentage points when compared to FPL's previous year variances. FPL and Ameresco's variances can also be observed
in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Both Ameresco and FPL's linear trends showed a upward slope.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐2.00%
‐1.00%
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
6.00%
7.00%
8.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 191,760 201,660 215,820 227,280
Amaresco's Consumption Data 218,671 217,173 218,375 232,264
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
Fire Station Maintenance FacilityExhibit: E11
Address: 2300 Pinetree Drive Account Number(s): 593677370 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 91,812 12 90,561 ‐1.4%
2014 103,562 12 12.80% 104,372 15.25% ‐2.45 No 0.8%
2015 104,227 12 0.64% 91,052 ‐12.76% 13.40 Yes ‐14.5%
2016 102,346 12 ‐1.80% 103,914 14.13% ‐15.93 Yes 1.5%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: 0.031 Trend: Upward
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: 0.026 Trend: Upward
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for Fire Station Maintenance
Facility does not differ significantly (with exception of 2015) from FPL's provided consumption data.
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): Two of the three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports (2015 & 2016) presented
differences of over 3 percentage points when compared to FPL's previous year variances. FPL and Ameresco's variances can also be observed
in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Both Ameresco and FPL's linear trends showed a slightly upward slope.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐15.00%
‐10.00%
‐5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 91,812 103,562 104,227 102,346
Amaresco's Consumption Data 90,561 104,372 91,052 103,914
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
Mechanical Maintenance/SanitationExhibit: E12
Address: 140 MacArthur Causeway Account Number(s): 7519176346 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 494,520 12 694,080 28.8%
2014 474,360 12 ‐4.08% 483,600 ‐30.33% 26.25 Yes 1.9%
2015 458,280 12 ‐3.39% 462,240 ‐4.42% 1.03 No 0.9%
2016 446,640 12 ‐2.54% 446,760 ‐3.35% 0.81 No 0.0%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: (0.032)Trend: Downward
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: (0.110)Trend: Downward
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for Mechanical
Maintenance/Sanitation does not differ significantly (with exception of 2013) from FPL's provided consumption data.
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): One of the three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports (2014) presented differences
of over 3 percentage points when compared to FPL's previous year variances. FPL and Ameresco's variances can also be observed in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Both Ameresco and FPL's linear trends showed a downward slope.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐35.00%
‐30.00%
‐25.00%
‐20.00%
‐15.00%
‐10.00%
‐5.00%
0.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 494,520 474,360 458,280 446,640
Amaresco's Consumption Data 694,080 483,600 462,240 446,760
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
Muss Park Recreation CenterExhibit: E13
Address: 4400 Chase Avenue Account Number(s): 1551674342 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 10,709 12 11,927 10.2%
2014 18,041 12 68.47% 17,599 47.56% 20.91 Yes ‐2.5%
2015 12,310 12 ‐31.77% 11,352 ‐35.50% 3.73 Yes ‐8.4%
2016 10,090 12 ‐18.03% 9,925 ‐12.57% ‐5.46 Yes ‐1.7%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: (0.042)Trend: Downward
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: (0.070)Trend: Downward
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for Muss Park Recreation
Center does not differ significantly from FPL's provided consumption data.
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): All three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports presented differences of over 3
percentage points when compared to FPL's previous year variances. FPL and Ameresco's variances can also be observed in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Both Ameresco and FPL's linear trends showed a downward slope.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐60.00%
‐40.00%
‐20.00%
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 10,709 18,041 12,310 10,090
Amaresco's Consumption Data 11,927 17,599 11,352 9,925
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
North Shore Community CenterExhibit: E14
Address: 7251 COLLINS AVE # BAND SHELL Account Number(s): 1007737560 6074583524 6404097237 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 115,855 36 224,906 48.5%
2014 112,378 36 ‐3.00% 229,038 1.84% ‐4.84 Yes 50.9%
2015 123,987 36 10.33% 191,842 ‐16.24% 26.57 Yes 35.4%
2016 117,425 36 ‐5.29% 205,960 7.36% ‐12.65 Yes 43.0%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: 0.013 Trend: Upward
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: (0.041)Trend: Downward
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for North Shore Community
Center differs significantly from FPL's provided consumption data.
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): All three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports presented a difference of over 3
percentage points when compared to previous year variance for FPL's data. FPL and Ameresco's variance differences can also be observed in
Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Ameresco's linear trend shows a downward slope against a slightly upward slope for FPL. This represents a
higher consumption trend (unfavorable) to the City than the one shown by Ameresco.
Note: This is a multiple‐account location. Conclusions are based on the sum of all accounts.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐20.00%
‐15.00%
‐10.00%
‐5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 115,855 112,378 123,987 117,425
Amaresco's Consumption Data 224,906 229,038 191,842 205,960
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
Office Building (777)Exhibit: E15
Address: 1701 Meridian Avenue Account Number(s): 848617304 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 680,320 12 683,360 0.4%
2014 687,360 12 1.03% 695,040 1.71% ‐0.67 No 1.1%
2015 728,640 12 6.01% 726,720 4.56% 1.45 No ‐0.3%
2016 665,120 12 ‐8.72% 668,000 ‐8.08% ‐0.64 No 0.4%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: (0.001)Trend: Steady
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: (0.002)Trend: Steady
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for the Office Building (777)
does not differ significantly from FPL's provided consumption data.
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): None of the three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports presented a difference of
over 3 percentage points when compared to previous year variance for FPL's data. FPL and Ameresco's variance differences can also be
observed in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Both Ameresco and FPL's linear trends fell within the steady range.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐10.00%
‐8.00%
‐6.00%
‐4.00%
‐2.00%
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 680,320 687,360 728,640 665,120
Amaresco's Consumption Data 683,360 695,040 726,720 668,000
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
Old City HallExhibit: E16
Address: 1130 Washington Drive Account Number(s): 7534176339 7542175349 7543173376 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 332,781 36 328,491 ‐1.3%
2014 337,840 36 1.52% 337,840 2.85% ‐1.33 No 0.0%
2015 323,880 36 ‐4.13% 299,391 ‐11.38% 7.25 Yes ‐8.2%
2016 344,012 36 6.22% 341,176 13.96% ‐7.74 Yes ‐0.8%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: 0.006 Trend: Steady
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: (0.000)Trend: Steady
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for Old City Hall does not differ
significantly from FPL's provided consumption data (except for 2015).
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): Two of the three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports (2015 & 2016) presented a
difference of over 3 percentage points when compared to previous year variance for FPL's data. FPL and Ameresco's variance differences can
also be observed in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Both Ameresco and FPL's linear trends fell within the steady range.
Note: This is a multiple‐account location. Conclusions are based on the sum of all accounts.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐15.00%
‐10.00%
‐5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 332,781 337,840 323,880 344,012
Amaresco's Consumption Data 328,491 337,840 299,391 341,176
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
Parks Division, NurseryExhibit: E17
Address: 2100 Meridian Avenue Account Number(s): 1505676344 1651590034 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 116,973 24 116,416 ‐0.5%
2014 130,228 24 11.33% 129,316 11.08% 0.25 No ‐0.7%
2015 111,462 24 ‐14.41% 99,656 ‐22.94% 8.53 Yes ‐11.8%
2016 119,870 24 7.54% 120,693 21.11% ‐13.57 Yes 0.7%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: (0.008)Trend: Steady
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: (0.013)Trend: Downward
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for Parks Division ‐ Nursery
does not differ significantly from FPL's provided consumption data (except for 2015).
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): Two of the three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports (2015 & 2016) presented a
difference of over 3 percentage points when compared to previous year variance for FPL's data. FPL and Ameresco's variance differences can
also be observed in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Ameresco's linear trend shows a slightly downward slope versus a steady slope for FPL. This represents a
higher consumption trend (unfavorable) to the City than the one shown by Ameresco.
Note: This is a multiple‐account location. Conclusions are based on the sum of all accounts.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐30.00%
‐25.00%
‐20.00%
‐15.00%
‐10.00%
‐5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 116,973 130,228 111,462 119,870
Amaresco's Consumption Data 116,416 129,316 99,656 120,693
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
Police Athletic LeagueExhibit: E18
Address: 999 11TH ST # TENIS CTR Account Number(s): 948817408 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 288,720 4 217,643 ‐32.7%
2014 352,440 12 22.07% 234,832 7.90% 14.17 Yes ‐50.1%
2015 384,540 12 9.11% 243,324 3.62% 5.49 Yes ‐58.0%
2016 345,360 12 ‐10.19% 184,979 ‐23.98% 13.79 Yes ‐86.7%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: 0.053 Trend: Upward
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: (0.037)Trend: Downward
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for Police Athletic League
differs significantly from FPL's provided consumption data
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): All three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports presented differences of over 3
percentage points when compared to FPL's previous year variances. FPL and Ameresco's variances can also be observed in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Ameresco's linear trend shows a downward slope versus an upward slope for FPL. This represents a higher
consumption trend (unfavorable) to the City than the one shown by Ameresco.
Note: The data provided by FPL included only 4 months for FY 2013 because this is a new account. To ensure fairness in trend comparison,
the four month consumption was extrapolated into a yearly basis 96,240 x 3 = 228,720)
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐30.00%
‐20.00%
‐10.00%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 288,720 352,440 384,540 345,360
Amaresco's Consumption Data 217,643 234,832 243,324 184,979
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
Police StationExhibit: E19
Address: 1100 Washington Drive Account Number(s): 435273347 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 3,256,560 12 3,256,560 0.0%
2014 3,111,600 12 ‐4.45% 3,108,480 ‐4.55% 0.10 No ‐0.1%
2015 3,001,680 12 ‐3.53% 2,998,080 ‐3.55% 0.02 No ‐0.1%
2016 2,987,760 12 ‐0.46% 2,968,800 ‐0.98% 0.51 No ‐0.6%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: (0.028)Trend: Downward
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: (0.030)Trend: Downward
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for the Police Station does not
differ significantly from FPL's provided consumption data.
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): None of the three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports presented a difference of
over 3 percentage points when compared to previous year variance for FPL's data. FPL and Ameresco's variance differences can also be
observed in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Both Ameresco and FPL's showed a slightly downward slope.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐5.00%
‐4.50%
‐4.00%
‐3.50%
‐3.00%
‐2.50%
‐2.00%
‐1.50%
‐1.00%
‐0.50%
0.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 3,256,560 3,111,600 3,001,680 2,987,760
Amaresco's Consumption Data 3,256,560 3,108,480 2,998,080 2,968,800
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
Recreation Center (21 Street)Exhibit: E20
Address: 2000‐2100 Washington Avenue Account Number(s): 6534171373 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 121,920 12 372,000 67.2%
2014 139,800 12 14.67% 412,920 11.00% 3.67 Yes 66.1%
2015 142,800 12 2.15% 435,480 5.46% ‐3.32 Yes 67.2%
2016 29,520 9 ‐79.33% 78,960 ‐81.87% 2.54 No 62.6%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: (0.192)Trend: Downward
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: (0.197)Trend: Downward
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for the Recreation Center (21
Street) differs significantly from FPL's provided consumption data
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): Two of the three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports (2014 & 2015) presented
differences of over 3 percentage points when compared to FPL's previous year variances. FPL and Ameresco's variances can also be observed
in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Both Ameresco and FPL's showed a downward slope.
Note: This Recreation Center was demolished in 2016.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐100.00%
‐80.00%
‐60.00%
‐40.00%
‐20.00%
0.00%
20.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 121,920 139,800 142,800 29,520
Amaresco's Consumption Data 372,000 412,920 435,480 78,960
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
Sailport/Police SubstationExhibit: E21
Address: 6860 Indian Creek Drive Account Number(s): 1722748413 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 53,152 12 439,317 87.9%
2014 62,319 12 17.25% 196,711 ‐55.22% 72.47 Yes 68.3%
2015 61,294 12 ‐1.64% 198,947 1.14% ‐2.78 No 69.2%
2016 69,128 12 12.78% 237,242 19.25% ‐6.47 Yes 70.9%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: 0.068 Trend: Upward
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: (0.137)Trend: Downward
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for Sailport/Police Substation
differs significantly from FPL's provided consumption data
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): Two of the three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports (2014 & 2016) presented
differences of over 3 percentage points when compared to FPL's previous year variances. FPL and Ameresco's variances can also be observed
in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Ameresco showed a downward slope versus an upward slope for FPL. This represents a higher
consumption trend (unfavorable) to the City than the one shown by Ameresco.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐60.00%
‐50.00%
‐40.00%
‐30.00%
‐20.00%
‐10.00%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 53,152 62,319 61,294 69,128
Amaresco's Consumption Data 439,317 196,711 198,947 237,242
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
South Shore Community CenterExhibit: E22
Address: 833 6 Street Account Number(s): 7520174371 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 487,080 12 480,720 ‐1.3%
2014 470,880 12 ‐3.33% 466,800 ‐2.90% ‐0.43 No ‐0.9%
2015 421,200 12 ‐10.55% 423,000 ‐9.38% ‐1.17 No 0.4%
2016 383,520 12 ‐8.95% 385,680 ‐8.82% ‐0.12 No 0.6%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: (0.074)Trend: Downward
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: (0.068)Trend: Downward
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for South Shore Community
Center does not differ significantly from FPL's provided consumption data.
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): None of the three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports presented a difference of
over 3 percentage points when compared to previous year variance for FPL's data. FPL and Ameresco's variance differences can also be
observed in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Both Ameresco and FPL's showed a downward slope.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐12.00%
‐10.00%
‐8.00%
‐6.00%
‐4.00%
‐2.00%
0.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 487,080 470,880 421,200 383,520
Amaresco's Consumption Data 480,720 466,800 423,000 385,680
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
Stillwater Park Recreation CenterExhibit: E23
Address: 8440 Hawthorne Avenue Account Number(s): 5678640599 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 9,995 12 9,995 0.0%
2014 9,016 12 ‐9.79% 8,904 ‐10.92% 1.12 No ‐1.3%
2015 12,092 12 34.12% 10,085 13.26% 20.85 Yes ‐19.9%
2016 10,828 12 ‐10.45% 9,723 ‐3.59% ‐6.86 Yes ‐11.4%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: 0.046 Trend: Upward
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: 0.004 Trend: Steady
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for Stillwater Park Recreation
Center differs from FPL's provided consumption data on years 2015 and 2016.
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): Two the three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports (2015 & 2016) presented a
difference of over 3 percentage points when compared to previous year variance for FPL's data. FPL and Ameresco's variance differences can
also be observed in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Ameresco's slope fell within the steady range versus an upward slope for FPL. This represents a higher
consumption trend (unfavorable) to the City than the one shown by Ameresco.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐15.00%
‐10.00%
‐5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 9,995 9,016 12,092 10,828
Amaresco's Consumption Data 9,995 8,904 10,085 9,723
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
Tatum Park Recreation CenterExhibit: E24
Address: 8050 Byron Avenue Account Number(s): 3691592384 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 10,983 12 11,049 0.6%
2014 8,271 12 ‐24.69% 8,013 ‐27.48% 2.78 No ‐3.2%
2015 13,982 12 69.05% 13,772 71.87% ‐2.82 No ‐1.5%
2016 17,450 12 24.80% 16,852 22.36% 2.44 No ‐3.5%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: 0.144 Trend: Upward
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: 0.137 Trend: Upward
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for Tatum Park Recreation
Center does not differ significantly from FPL's provided consumption data.
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): None of the three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports presented a difference of
over 3 percentage points when compared to previous year variance for FPL's data. FPL and Ameresco's variance differences can also be
observed in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Both Ameresco and FPL's showed a upward slope.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐40.00%
‐20.00%
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 10,983 8,271 13,982 17,450
Amaresco's Consumption Data 11,049 8,013 13,772 16,852
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
VCA Building (555)Exhibit: E25
Address: 505‐555 17 Street Account Number(s): 8813539429 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 576,000 12 232,800 ‐147.4%
2014 511,440 12 ‐11.21% 243,760 4.71% ‐15.92 Yes ‐109.8%
2015 423,120 12 ‐17.27% 272,560 11.81% ‐29.08 Yes ‐55.2%
2016 434,280 12 2.64% 238,400 ‐12.53% 15.17 Yes ‐82.2%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: (0.089)Trend: Downward
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: 0.017 Trend: Upward
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for the VCA Building (555)
differs significantly from FPL's provided consumption data
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): All three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports presented differences of over 3
percentage points when compared to FPL's previous year variances. FPL and Ameresco's variances can also be observed in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Ameresco's showed a upward slope versus a downward slope for FPL. This represents a lower consumption
trend (favorable) to the City than the one shown by Ameresco.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐20.00%
‐15.00%
‐10.00%
‐5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 576,000 511,440 423,120 434,280
Amaresco's Consumption Data 232,800 243,760 272,560 238,400
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
Youth Center (Scott Rakow)Exhibit: E26
Address: 2700 Sheridan Avenue Account Number(s): 1521674364 A B C D E Test #1 F
Fiscal Year (Ending Sept
30th)
Total KWHs per Year Consumption
Based on FPL's DataCount of Bills per Year Variance from Previous Year in % (FPL)
Total KWHs per Year
Consumption Based on
Ameresco's Data
Variance from Previous Year in %
(Ameresco)
Percentage Points Difference
Between FPL and Ameresco
Variances (B‐D)
Does The Net Variance Exceed Three (3) Percentage
Points?
% Difference Between FPL and Ameresco
Total Consumption (C‐A)/C
2013 1,902,000 12 1,894,080 ‐0.4%
2014 1,780,560 12 ‐6.38% 1,747,920 ‐7.72% 1.33 No ‐1.9%
2015 1,576,560 12 ‐11.46% 1,589,040 ‐9.09% ‐2.37 No 0.8%
2016 1,674,240 12 6.20% 1,667,280 4.92% 1.27 No ‐0.4%
Conclusions:
FPL Slope & TrendSlope: (0.047)Trend: Downward
Ameresco Slope & TrendSlope: (0.044)Trend: Downward
Note:
Total KWH Consumption (Info A, C, F and clustered columns in Chart 1): Ameresco's total yearly consumption for the Youth Center (Scott
Rakow) does not differ significantly from FPL's provided consumption data.
Differences on Yearly Variance (Test #1): None of the three comparable Ameresco Annual Reconciliation Reports presented a difference of
over 3 percentage points when compared to previous year variance for FPL's data. FPL and Ameresco's variance differences can also be
observed in Chart 2.
Linear Trend (Arrows in Chart 1): Both Ameresco and FPL's showed a downward slope.
Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range
are considered steady. For all other
slopes, positive numbers represent
upward trends and negative numbers
"( )"represent downward trends.
‐14.00%
‐12.00%
‐10.00%
‐8.00%
‐6.00%
‐4.00%
‐2.00%
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
2014 2015 2016
(Chart 2) Previous Year to Current Consumption Variance (%) Comparison From FY 2013 to FY 2016
FPL Consumption Data Amaresco's Consumption Data
2013 2014 2015 2016
FPL Consumption Data 1,902,000 1,780,560 1,576,560 1,674,240
Amaresco's Consumption Data 1,894,080 1,747,920 1,589,040 1,667,280
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
1,800,000
2,000,000
(Chart 1) Power Consumption Data During The Four Annual Reconciliation Reports + Linear Trend (FY 2013 to FY 2016)
Exhibit F
Total Water Consumption by Calendar Year Calendar Year (January 1st through December 31st)
Locations 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
21 Street Recreation Center 2,754 1,223 713 686 715 65 (0.156) Downward
Bayshore Maintenance Building 1,369 2,902 2,628 2,096 3,234 2,737 0.065 Upward
City Hall 6,816 4,626 3,099 2,275 2,541 3,069 (0.108) Downward
Colony Theater 8,142 8,343 9,583 9,595 10,139 11,114 0.052 Upward
Comfort Facility 1,987 2,448 1,783 422 572 0 (0.198) Downward
Convention Center 72,516 62,104 96,081 64,597 63,026 13,829 (0.096) Downward
Crespi Recreation Center 110 308 200 248 369 306 0.094 Upward
Fairway Park Recreation Center 33,155 21,837 33,658 28,282 28,994 33,756 0.016 Upward
Fire Station #1 20,233 16,029 7,872 2,204 2,641 5,075 (0.172) Downward
Fire Station #2 & Fire Station Maintenance Facility 740 938 921 761 786 784 (0.012) Downward
Fire Station #3 2,824 2,542 2,474 2,732 3,764 4,628 0.080 Upward
Mechanical Maintenance/Sanitation 2,196 1,115 1,501 1,961 2,453 2,560 0.070 Upward
North Shore Community Center N/A 814 655 405 3,566 12,863 0.210 Upward
Office Building (777) 2,597 5,734 4,559 5,346 5,837 6,845 0.093 Upward
Old City Hall 2,821 4,844 3,724 2,701 2,983 3,723 (0.012) Downward
Parks Division, Nursery 9,581 4,493 11,685 15,144 14,125 14,918 0.111 Upward
Police Athletic League 19,446 13,712 13,876 15,428 18,336 10,987 (0.039) Downward
Police Station 32,874 20,708 23,529 28,798 42,658 46,425 0.085 Upward
Sailport/Police Substation 366 2,912 1,421 1,418 735 1,065 (0.030) Downward
South Shore Community Center 7,691 4,587 5,671 3,614 3,496 8,449 (0.005) Steady
Stillwater Park Recreation Center 210 247 63 113 363 328 0.078 Upward
Tatum Park Recreation Center 71 233 193 126 214 319 0.100 Upward
Youth Center (Scott Rakow) 12,801 17,621 28,498 23,530 38,431 42,158 0.138 Upward
Total 23
Trend Count % (See Note 3)
Upward 13 57%
Downward 9 39%
Steady 1 4%
Total 23 100%
Note 1: VCA Building (555) and Muss Park Recreation Center were part of the sample, but data was not received for these locations.
Note 2: Slope was calculated through Excel's regression analysis formula, SLOPE (Total kWh consumption,Year). Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are
considered steady. For all other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
Note 3: Sum of total locations is 23 because Fire Station #2 and Fire Station Maintenance Facility were bundled as no information to segregate water meters was obtained.
dddd
Slope Trend
Slope: (0.156) Trend: Downward Exhibit: G1
Meter Address(es):
21 Street Recreation Center Meter Number(s): 865172 9704287
Calendar YearWater Total Consumption
(x 100 Gallons)Variance from Previous
Year in %
Count of Bills per Year
(Line Items) Conclusion2011 2,754 24
2012 1,223 ‐55.59% 24
2013 713 ‐41.70% 24
2014 686 ‐3.79% 24
2015 715 4.23% 24
2016 65 ‐90.91% 24
21 Street Recreation Center showed a steady
downward slope (this building was demolished
due to Convention Center expansion)
2100 1/2 WASHINGTON AVE
Note: Conclusions on multi‐meter locations are based on sum of all
meters. Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all
other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative
numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016 2,754 1,223 713 686 715 65
‐500
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
‐55.59%‐41.70%
‐3.79%4.23%
‐90.91%
‐100.00%
‐80.00%
‐60.00%
‐40.00%
‐20.00%
0.00%
20.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Yearly Water Consumption Variance (%) From 2011 to 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
Slope: 0.065 Trend: Upward Exhibit: G2
Meter Address(es):
Bayshore Maintenance Building Meter Number(s): 02024361 09607003
Calendar YearWater Total Consumption
(x 100 Gallons)Variance from Previous
Year in %
Count of Bills per Year
(Line Items) Conclusion2011 1,369 24
2012 2,902 111.98% 24
2013 2,628 ‐9.44% 24
2014 2,096 ‐20.24% 26
2015 3,234 54.29% 24
2016 2,737 ‐15.37% 24
Bayshore Maintenance Building showed an
upward slope.
2800 1/2 N MERIDIAN AVE
Note: Conclusions on multi‐meter locations are based on sum of all
meters. Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all
other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative
numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016 1,369 2,902 2,628 2,096 3,234 2,737
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
111.98%
‐9.44%‐20.24%
54.29%
‐15.37%
‐50.00%
0.00%
50.00%
100.00%
150.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Yearly Water Consumption Variance (%) From 2011 to 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
Slope: (0.108) Trend: Downward Exhibit: G3
Meter Address(es):
City Hall Meter Number(s): 2004041 2004048
Calendar YearWater Total Consumption
(x 100 Gallons)Variance from Previous
Year in %
Count of Bills per Year
(Line Items) Conclusion2011 6,816 24
2012 4,626 ‐32.13% 24
2013 3,099 ‐33.01% 24
2014 2,275 ‐26.59% 24
2015 2,541 11.69% 24
2016 3,069 20.78% 24
City Hall showed a downward yearly
consumption. However, it is been noted an
upward trend in the last two years.
1700 CONVENTION CENTER DR 1702 CONVENTION CENTER DR
Note: Conclusions on multi‐meter locations are based on sum of all
meters. Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all
other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative
numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016 6,816 4,626 3,099 2,275 2,541 3,069
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
‐32.13% ‐33.01%‐26.59%
11.69%
20.78%
‐40.00%
‐30.00%
‐20.00%
‐10.00%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Yearly Water Consumption Variance (%) From 2011 to 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
Slope: 0.052 Trend: Upward Exhibit: G4
Meter Address(es):
Colony Theater Meter Number(s): 9704059 20101101 60813886 60813892
Calendar YearWater Total Consumption
(x 100 Gallons)Variance from Previous
Year in %
Count of Bills per Year
(Line Items) Conclusion2011 8,142 24
2012 8,343 2.47% 24
2013 9,583 14.86% 42
2014 9,595 0.13% 48
2015 10,139 5.67% 48
2016 11,114 9.62% 48
Colony Theater showed an upward slope.
1040 LINCOLN RD 1622 LENOX AVE
Note: Conclusions on multi‐meter locations are based on sum of all
meters. Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all
other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative
numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016 8,142 8,343 9,583 9,595 10,139 11,114
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
2.47%
14.86%
0.13%
5.67%
9.62%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Yearly Water Consumption Variance (%) From 2011 to 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
Slope: (0.198) Trend: Downward Exhibit: G5
Meter Address(es):
Comfort Facility Meter Number(s): 2020571 9704565
Calendar YearWater Total Consumption
(x 100 Gallons)Variance from Previous
Year in %
Count of Bills per Year
(Line Items) Conclusion2011 1,987 24
2012 2,448 23.20% 24
2013 1,783 ‐27.17% 24
2014 422 ‐76.33% 28
2015 572 35.55% 24
2016 0 ‐100.00% 24
Comfort Facility showed a steady downward
slope.
4600 1/2 COLLINS AVE
Note: Conclusions on multi‐meter locations are based on sum of all
meters. Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all
other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative
numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016 1,987 2,448 1,783 422 572 0
‐500
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
23.20%
‐27.17%
‐76.33%
35.55%
‐100.00%
‐150.00%
‐100.00%
‐50.00%
0.00%
50.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Yearly Water Consumption Variance (%) From 2011 to 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
Slope: (0.096) Trend: Downward Exhibit: G6
Meter Address(es):
Convention Center Meter Number(s): 01240399 02044853 09704145 09704168 09704170 09904128
Calendar YearWater Total Consumption
(x 100 Gallons)Variance from Previous
Year in %
Count of Bills per Year
(Line Items) Conclusion2011 72,516 72
2012 62,104 ‐14.36% 72
2013 96,081 54.71% 72
2014 64,597 ‐32.77% 72
2015 63,026 ‐2.43% 72
2016 13,829 ‐78.06% 72
Convention Center showed a downward slope.
1900 1/2 CONVENTION CENTER DR 1900 1/2 WASHINGTON AVE 1901
1/2 CONVENTION CENTER DR 2000 1/2 WASHINGTON AVE
Note: Conclusions on multi‐meter locations are based on sum of all
meters. Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all
other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative
numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016 72,516 62,104 96,081 64,597 63,026 13,829
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
‐14.36%
54.71%
‐32.77%
‐2.43%
‐78.06%
‐100.00%
‐50.00%
0.00%
50.00%
100.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Yearly Water Consumption Variance (%) From 2011 to 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
Slope: 0.094 Trend: Upward Exhibit: G7
Meter Address(es):
Crespi Recreation Center Meter Number(s): 09701103
Calendar YearWater Total Consumption
(x 100 Gallons)Variance from Previous
Year in %
Count of Bills per Year
(Line Items) Conclusion2011 110 12
2012 308 180.00% 12
2013 200 ‐35.06% 12
2014 248 24.00% 12
2015 369 48.79% 12
2016 306 ‐17.07% 12
Crespi Recreation Center showed an upward
slope.
7821 1/2 HAWTHORNE AVE
Note: Conclusions on multi‐meter locations are based on sum of all
meters. Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all
other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative
numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016 110 308 200 248 369 306
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
180.00%
‐35.06%
24.00%48.79%
‐17.07%
‐50.00%
0.00%
50.00%
100.00%
150.00%
200.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Yearly Water Consumption Variance (%) From 2011 to 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
Slope: 0.016 Trend: Upward Exhibit: G8
Meter Address(es):
Fairway Park Recreation Center Meter Number(s): 2044761 2044788
Calendar YearWater Total Consumption
(x 100 Gallons)Variance from Previous
Year in %
Count of Bills per Year
(Line Items) Conclusion2011 33,155 24
2012 21,837 ‐34.14% 24
2013 33,658 54.13% 24
2014 28,282 ‐15.97% 24
2015 28,994 2.52% 24
2016 33,756 16.42% 24
Fairway Park Recreation Center showed a
moderate upward slope.
200 FAIRWAY DR
Note: Conclusions on multi‐meter locations are based on sum of all
meters. Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all
other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative
numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016 33,155 21,837 33,658 28,282 28,994 33,756
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
‐34.14%
54.13%
‐15.97%
2.52%
16.42%
‐40.00%
‐20.00%
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Yearly Water Consumption Variance (%) From 2011 to 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
Slope: (0.172) Trend: Downward Exhibit: G9
Meter Address(es):
Fire Station #1 Meter Number(s): 2043240 9704191
Calendar YearWater Total Consumption
(x 100 Gallons)Variance from Previous
Year in %
Count of Bills per Year
(Line Items) Conclusion2011 20,233 24
2012 16,029 ‐20.78% 24
2013 7,872 ‐50.89% 24
2014 2,204 ‐72.00% 24
2015 2,641 19.83% 24
2016 5,075 92.16% 24
Fire Station #1 showed a downward slope.
However, it is been noted an upward trend in
the last two years.
1045 JEFFERSON AVE 1051 JEFFERSON AVE
Note: Conclusions on multi‐meter locations are based on sum of all
meters. Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all
other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative
numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016 20,233 16,029 7,872 2,204 2,641 5,075
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
‐20.78%‐50.89%
‐72.00%
19.83%
92.16%
‐100.00%
‐50.00%
0.00%
50.00%
100.00%
150.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Yearly Water Consumption Variance (%) From 2011 to 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
Slope: (0.012) Trend: Downward Exhibit: G10
Meter Address(es):
Fire Station #2 & Fire Station Maintenance Facility Meter Number(s): 2044547 9603533 9704260
Calendar YearWater Total Consumption
(x 100 Gallons)Variance from Previous
Year in %
Count of Bills per Year
(Line Items) Conclusion2011 740 36
2012 938 26.76% 36
2013 921 ‐1.81% 36
2014 761 ‐17.37% 36
2015 786 3.29% 36
2016 784 ‐0.25% 36
Fire Station #2 & Fire Station Maintenance
Facility showed a moderate downward slope.
2300 PINE TREE DR
Note: Conclusions on multi‐meter locations are based on sum of all
meters. Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all
other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative
numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016 740 938 921 761 786 784
0100200
300400500
600700800900
1,000
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
26.76%
‐1.81%
‐17.37%
3.29%‐0.25%
‐20.00%
‐10.00%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Yearly Water Consumption Variance (%) From 2011 to 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
Slope: 0.080 Trend: Upward Exhibit: G11
Meter Address(es):
Fire Station #3 Meter Number(s): 9704103
Calendar YearWater Total Consumption
(x 100 Gallons)Variance from Previous
Year in %
Count of Bills per Year
(Line Items) Conclusion2011 2,824 12
2012 2,542 ‐9.99% 12
2013 2,474 ‐2.68% 12
2014 2,732 10.43% 14
2015 3,764 37.77% 12
2016 4,628 22.95% 12
Fire Station #3 showed an upward slope.
5303 1/2 COLLINS AVE
Note: Conclusions on multi‐meter locations are based on sum of all
meters. Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all
other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative
numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016 2,824 2,542 2,474 2,732 3,764 4,628
0500
1,000
1,5002,0002,500
3,0003,5004,0004,500
5,000
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
‐9.99%‐2.68%
10.43%
37.77%
22.95%
‐20.00%
‐10.00%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Yearly Water Consumption Variance (%) From 2011 to 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
Slope: 0.070 Trend: Upward Exhibit: G12
Meter Address(es):
Mechanical Maintenance/Sanitation Meter Number(s): 9704186 20111468
Calendar YearWater Total Consumption
(x 100 Gallons)Variance from Previous
Year in %
Count of Bills per Year
(Line Items) Conclusion2011 2,196 12
2012 1,115 ‐49.23% 12
2013 1,501 34.62% 22
2014 1,961 30.65% 24
2015 2,453 25.09% 24
2016 2,560 4.36% 24
Mechanical Maintenance/Sanitation showed
an upward slope.
140 MAC ARTHUR CSWY
Note: Conclusions on multi‐meter locations are based on sum of all
meters. Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all
other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative
numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016 2,196 1,115 1,501 1,961 2,453 2,560
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
‐49.23%
34.62% 30.65% 25.09%
4.36%
‐60.00%
‐40.00%
‐20.00%
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Yearly Water Consumption Variance (%) From 2011 to 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
Slope: 0.210 Trend: Upward Exhibit: G13
Meter Address(es):
North Shore Community Center Meter Number(s): 20104628
Calendar YearWater Total Consumption
(x 100 Gallons)Variance from Previous
Year in %
Count of Bills per Year
(Line Items) Conclusion2012 814 9
2013 655 ‐19.53% 12
2014 405 ‐38.17% 12
2015 3,566 780.49% 13
2016 12,863 260.71% 12
North Shore Community Center showed an
upward slope.
7231 COLLINS AVE
Note: Conclusions on multi‐meter locations are based on sum of all
meters. Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all
other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative
numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016 814 655 405 3,566 12,863
‐4,000
‐2,000
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
‐19.53% ‐38.17%
780.49%
260.71%
‐200.00%
0.00%
200.00%
400.00%
600.00%
800.00%
1000.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Yearly Water Consumption Variance (%) From 2011 to 2016
Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
Slope: 0.093 Trend: Upward Exhibit: G14
Meter Address(es):
Office Building (777) Meter Number(s): 09700883 09703655 20094612 20104716
Calendar YearWater Total Consumption
(x 100 Gallons)Variance from Previous
Year in %
Count of Bills per Year
(Line Items) Conclusion2011 2,597 50
2012 5,734 120.79% 48
2013 4,559 ‐20.49% 48
2014 5,346 17.26% 48
2015 5,837 9.18% 48
2016 6,845 17.27% 48
Office Building (777) showed an upward slope.
1701 MERIDIAN AVE
Note: Conclusions on multi‐meter locations are based on sum of all
meters. Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all
other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative
numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016 2,597 5,734 4,559 5,346 5,837 6,845
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
120.79%
‐20.49%
17.26% 9.18% 17.27%
‐50.00%
0.00%
50.00%
100.00%
150.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Yearly Water Consumption Variance (%) From 2011 to 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
Slope: (0.012) Trend: Downward Exhibit: G15
Meter Address(es):
Old City Hall Meter Number(s): 2042683 9904012 20094664
Calendar YearWater Total Consumption
(x 100 Gallons)Variance from Previous
Year in %
Count of Bills per Year
(Line Items) Conclusion2011 2,821 36
2012 4,844 71.71% 36
2013 3,724 ‐23.12% 36
2014 2,701 ‐27.47% 36
2015 2,983 10.44% 36
2016 3,723 24.81% 36
Old City Hall showed a moderate downward
slope. However, it is been noted an upward
trend in the last two years.
1130 WASHINGTON AVE
Note: Conclusions on multi‐meter locations are based on sum of all
meters. Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all
other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative
numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016 2,821 4,844 3,724 2,701 2,983 3,723
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
71.71%
‐23.12% ‐27.47%
10.44%24.81%
‐40.00%
‐20.00%
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Yearly Water Consumption Variance (%) From 2011 to 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
Slope: 0.111 Trend: Upward Exhibit: G16
Meter Address(es):
Parks Division, Nursery Meter Number(s): 02020745 09704262
Calendar YearWater Total Consumption
(x 100 Gallons)Variance from Previous
Year in %
Count of Bills per Year
(Line Items) Conclusion2011 9,581 24
2012 4,493 ‐53.11% 24
2013 11,685 160.07% 24
2014 15,144 29.60% 24
2015 14,125 ‐6.73% 24
2016 14,918 5.61% 24
Parks Division, Nursery showed an upward
slope.
2100 MERIDIAN AVE
Note: Conclusions on multi‐meter locations are based on sum of all
meters. Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all
other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative
numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016 9,581 4,493 11,685 15,144 14,125 14,918
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
‐53.11%
160.07%
29.60%‐6.73% 5.61%
‐100.00%
‐50.00%
0.00%
50.00%
100.00%
150.00%
200.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Yearly Water Consumption Variance (%) From 2011 to 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
Slope: (0.039) Trend: Downward Exhibit: G17
Meter Address(es):
Police Athletic League Meter Number(s): 2044852 20094763 20113005 21113005
Calendar YearWater Total Consumption
(x 100 Gallons)Variance from Previous
Year in %
Count of Bills per Year
(Line Items) Conclusion2011 19,446 48
2012 13,712 ‐29.49% 48
2013 13,876 1.20% 28
2014 15,428 11.18% 24
2015 18,336 18.85% 33
2016 10,987 ‐40.08% 36
Police Athletic League showed a moderate
downward slope.
999 11TH ST
Note: Conclusions on multi‐meter locations are based on sum of all
meters. Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all
other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative
numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016 19,446 13,712 13,876 15,428 18,336 10,987
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
‐29.49%
1.20%11.18%
18.85%
‐40.08%
‐50.00%‐40.00%‐30.00%‐20.00%‐10.00%0.00%
10.00%20.00%30.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Yearly Water Consumption Variance (%) From 2011 to 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
Slope: 0.085 Trend: Upward Exhibit: G18
Meter Address(es):
Police Station Meter Number(s): 1197455 9104029
Calendar YearWater Total Consumption
(x 100 Gallons)Variance from Previous
Year in %
Count of Bills per Year
(Line Items) Conclusion2011 32,874 24
2012 20,708 ‐37.01% 24
2013 23,529 13.62% 24
2014 28,798 22.39% 24
2015 42,658 48.13% 24
2016 46,425 8.83% 24
Police Station showed an upward slope.
1100 WASHINGTON AVE
Note: Conclusions on multi‐meter locations are based on sum of all
meters. Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all
other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative
numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016 32,874 20,708 23,529 28,798 42,658 46,425
05,000
10,000
15,00020,00025,000
30,00035,00040,00045,000
50,000
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
‐37.01%
13.62%22.39%
48.13%
8.83%
‐60.00%
‐40.00%
‐20.00%
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Yearly Water Consumption Variance (%) From 2011 to 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
Slope: (0.030) Trend: Downward Exhibit: G19
Meter Address(es):
Sailport/Police Substation Meter Number(s): 09603213
Calendar YearWater Total Consumption
(x 100 Gallons)Variance from Previous
Year in %
Count of Bills per Year
(Line Items) Conclusion2011 366 12
2012 2,912 695.63% 12
2013 1,421 ‐51.20% 12
2014 1,418 ‐0.21% 12
2015 735 ‐48.17% 12
2016 1,065 44.90% 12
Sailport/Police Substation showed an
downward slope.
6840 INDIAN CREEK DR
Note: Conclusions on multi‐meter locations are based on sum of all
meters. Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all
other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative
numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016 366 2,912 1,421 1,418 735 1,065
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
695.63%
‐51.20% ‐0.21% ‐48.17%44.90%
‐200.00%
0.00%
200.00%
400.00%
600.00%
800.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Yearly Water Consumption Variance (%) From 2011 to 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
Slope: (0.005) Trend: Steady Exhibit: G20
Meter Address(es):
South Shore Community Center Meter Number(s): 09704181
Calendar YearWater Total Consumption
(x 100 Gallons)Variance from Previous
Year in %
Count of Bills per Year
(Line Items) Conclusion2011 7,691 12
2012 4,587 ‐40.36% 12
2013 5,671 23.63% 12
2014 3,614 ‐36.27% 12
2015 3,496 ‐3.27% 12
2016 8,449 141.68% 13
South Shore Community Center showed a
steady consumption with spikes in 2011 and
2016
833 6TH ST
Note: Conclusions on multi‐meter locations are based on sum of all
meters. Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all
other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative
numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016 7,691 4,587 5,671 3,614 3,496 8,449
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
‐40.36%
23.63%
‐36.27%
‐3.27%
141.68%
‐50.00%
0.00%
50.00%
100.00%
150.00%
200.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Yearly Water Consumption Variance (%) From 2011 to 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
Slope: 0.078 Trend: Upward Exhibit: G21
Meter Address(es):
Stillwater Park Recreation Center Meter Number(s): 09603275
Calendar YearWater Total Consumption
(x 100 Gallons)Variance from Previous
Year in %
Count of Bills per Year
(Line Items) Conclusion2011 210 12
2012 247 17.62% 12
2013 63 ‐74.49% 12
2014 113 79.37% 12
2015 363 221.24% 12
2016 328 ‐9.64% 12
Stillwater Park Recreation Center showed an
upward slope.
8500 1/2 HAWTHORNE AVE
Note: Conclusions on multi‐meter locations are based on sum of all
meters. Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all
other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative
numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016 210 247 63 113 363 328
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
17.62%
‐74.49%
79.37%
221.24%
‐9.64%
‐100.00%
‐50.00%
0.00%
50.00%
100.00%
150.00%
200.00%
250.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Yearly Water Consumption Variance (%) From 2011 to 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
Slope: 0.100 Trend: Upward Exhibit: G22
Meter Address(es):
Tatum Park Recreation Center Meter Number(s): 09602613
Calendar YearWater Total Consumption
(x 100 Gallons)Variance from Previous
Year in %
Count of Bills per Year
(Line Items) Conclusion2011 71 13
2012 233 228.17% 12
2013 193 ‐17.17% 12
2014 126 ‐34.72% 12
2015 214 69.84% 12
2016 319 49.07% 12
Tatum Park Recreation Center showed an
upward slope.
8025 1/2 BYRON AVE
Note: Conclusions on multi‐meter locations are based on sum of all
meters. Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all
other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative
numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016 71 233 193 126 214 319
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
228.17%
‐17.17% ‐34.72%
69.84%49.07%
‐100.00%
‐50.00%
0.00%
50.00%
100.00%
150.00%
200.00%
250.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Yearly Water Consumption Variance (%) From 2011 to 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
Slope: 0.138 Trend: Upward Exhibit: G23
Meter Address(es):
Youth Center (Scott Rakow) Meter Number(s): 00023430 20106411
Calendar YearWater Total Consumption
(x 100 Gallons)Variance from Previous
Year in %
Count of Bills per Year
(Line Items) Conclusion2011 12,801 7
2012 17,621 37.65% 12
2013 28,498 61.73% 21
2014 23,530 ‐17.43% 24
2015 38,431 63.33% 24
2016 42,158 9.70% 24
Youth Center (Scott Rakow) showed an
upward slope.
2700 SHERIDAN AVE
Note: Conclusions on multi‐meter locations are based on sum of all
meters. Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all
other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative
numbers "( )"represent downward trends.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016 12,801 17,621 28,498 23,530 38,431 42,158
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016
37.65%
61.73%
‐17.43%
63.33%
9.70%
‐40.00%
‐20.00%
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Yearly Water Consumption Variance (%) From 2011 to 2016
Water Consumption Data From 2011 to 2016