Merging statistics and geospatial information - demography / commuting / spatial planning /...

Post on 30-Nov-2014

148 views 4 download

Tags:

description

17.06.2014 - INSPIRE Conference 2014, Aalborg, Denmark Polish achievements in the "Merging statistics and geospatial information" project: •Spatial visualization of demographic data •Enterprise address spatialization •Commuting statistics •Statistical indicators for spatial planning

Transcript of Merging statistics and geospatial information - demography / commuting / spatial planning /...

Merging statistics and geospatial information Demography / Commuting / Spatial planning / Registers

Mirosław MigaczChief GIS Specialist

Central Statistical Office of PolandINSPIRE Conference 2014: Inspire for good governance

Aalborg, June 17th 2013

2

Agenda

The aim

The team

The tasks• Spatial visualization of demographic data• Enterprise address spatialization• Commuting statistics• Statistical indicators for spatial planning

The results• Conclusions

The aim

3

•Population and Housing Census 2011 results

•other statistical datasets possessed by CSO

Geospatial analysis with use of:

•Spatial address databases (maintained within official statistics)

•Database of Topographic Objects (acquired from the mapping agency)

Evaluation of reference materials

in geostatistics production process:

The team

4

Programming and Coordination of Statistical Surveys Department @ CSO, Warsaw• Amelia Wardzińska-Sharif• Janusz Dygaszewicz• Mirosław Migacz• Magdalena Pączek-Borowska• Agnieszka Nowakowska

Urban Statistics Centre @ SO Poznań• Sylwia Filas-Przybył• Maciej Kaźmierczak• Dawid Pawlikowski

Regional and Environmental Surveys Department @ CSO, Warsaw• Marek Pieniążek• Robert Buciak

Statistical Computing Centre, Łódź• Radosław Jabłoński

SPATIAL VISUALIZATIONOF DEMOGRAPHIC DATA

Spatial visualization of demographic data

Source data• attribute data• spatial data

Methods of aggregation to various statistical units• 1 km x 1 km grid• Cadastral units• Statistical regions• Census enumeration areas

Cartographic presentation of the results

Source data

Attribute

• Tables with population distribution data acquired from the Population and Housing Census 2011:• Person ID• X, Y coordinates (acquired

from spatial address databases created and maintained within official statistics)

• 39 tables (one for each million people)

Spatial

• Boundaries of statistical regions and census enumeration areas (spatial address databases)

• Cadastral units (mapping agency)

• Kilometer grid – Grid_ETRS89_LAEA_PL_1K (European Forum for Geography and Statistics)

1 km x 1 km grid

• Grid_ETRS89_LAEA_PL_1K – the european INSPIRE grid• Cell coordinates – lower left corner• Aggregation of persons to specific grid cells possible w/o GIS

software (Visual Basic for Applications used here for example)

1 km x 1 km grid

• Number of persons in each grid cell calculated with ArcGIS (Dissolve tool), though any other database software could be used

• The operation was conducted separately for each of the 39 tables

Cadastral units

• Aggregation to irregular division of space requires GIS software

• Environment: ArcGIS file geodatabase• Spatial operations on a feature class with 38,5 mln objects

exceed RAM capabilities of workstations and servers

Cadastral units

Back to 39 separate tables >> need for automation

Use of Python scripting with the arcpy module that contains all ArcGIS tools

• The script was processing 39 datasets– Spatial join of the 1st dataset to the

geometry of cadastral units (with calculation of total population) – the initial dataset

– For each subsequent spatial join the current calculated population was added to the total population for each cadastral unit

Statistical regions and census enumeration areas

The same tools that were used for cadastral units (ArcGIS, Python)

A slightly different method of cyclic dataset processing:

• statistical regions / census enumeration areas were spatially joined to datasets with persons 39 times >> 39 temporary feature classes

• 39 feature classes merged into one >> 1 feature class with 39 duplicate geometries for each statistical region / census enumeration area

• deduplication of the geometries with total population calculation for each geometry (Dissolve tool in ArcGIS)

Data aggregation – conclusions

• Point data aggregation to grids can be done without GIS software – any database software with e.g. VBA is sufficient

• Point data aggregation to an irregular division of space requires GIS software

• Processing of huge datasets requires automation, which can be acchieved with Python scripting:– requires script preparation and testing on a data sample– all processes can be run on a separate machine / server and they do

not require the operator’s attention

Cartographic presentation of the results

• 1 km x 1 km grid – total population in each grid cell (= population density)

• Cadastral units, statistical regions, census enumeration areas – choropleth maps of population density

Classifications(5 classes)

average value as the center of the middle class

quantiles

Colour scales

2-color gradient

monochromatic

1 km x 1 km grid

1 km x 1 km grid

1 km x 1 km grid

1 km x 1 km grid

Cadastral units

Census enumeration areas

Cadastral units – quantiles

Census enumeration areas – quantiles

Cadastral units vs census enumeration areas (quantiles)

Quantiles – conclusions

• Significant differences between quantile presentations:– For the 1 km x 1 km grid a separate class for „0” was created– Huge differences in classification between cadastral units and census

enumeration areas due to these divisions having been created for different purposes:• Cadastral units for legal management of land ownership• Census enumeration areas for the purpose of conducting censuses (size

dependant on the population count)

ENTERPRISE ADDRESS SPATIALIZATION

Source data

Attribute•Social insurance registers•Taxpayers register•Inland revenues database•Statistical registerof enterprises

Spatial•Spatial address databases (maintained within official statistics)•Databaseof Topographic Objects (acquired from the mapping agency)

Enterprise address spatialization

Pairing „as is”(62%)

Address number

simplification (e.g. 3A -> 3)(5,9%)

No address point

(nearest address number)(18,6%)

No address number (address point on

same street or locality centroid)

(1,8%)

No street ID

(locality centroid)

(3,6%)

Other cases

(locality centroid)

(8,1%)

Address descriptive information paired with:

• address points from the Spatial Address Databases• address points from the Database of Topographic Objects

COMMUTING STATISTICS

Commutera person whose employer’s registered office is outside the administrative borders of the gmina (municipality, LAU2) of residence

Commuting statistics

Source data

• attribute data• spatial data

Actions

• Directions of population movements related to employment• Commuting to/from Poznań• Commuting within voivodships

Cartographic presentation of the results

Source data

Attribute•Tables with demographic data acquired from the Population and Housing Census 2011:•Person ID•Age•Gender•Dwelling address and X, Y coordinates•Workplace address and X, Y coordinates•Income•Economic activity classification•Fact of commuting•3,1 million records

Spatial•Boundaries of the territorial division of the country•Spatial Address Databases (source of dwelling coordinates and boundaries of statistical regions and census enumeration areas)•Spatialized enterprise addresses (source of workplace coordinates)•Kilometer grid – Grid_ETRS89_LAEA_PL_1K (European Forum for Geography and Statistics)

Percentage of commuters in the number of employees

statistical unit: powiat (county) (LAU1)

Surplus – arriving / departing to work

statistical unit: 1km x 1km grid (ETRS89-LAEA)

Surplus – arriving / departing to work

area: city of Poznań and surroundingsstatistical unit: 1km x 1km grid (ETRS89-LAEA)

Quotient of commuting flows

area: city of Poznaństatistical unit: census enumeration area

Arriving / departing to work

area: city of Poznaństatistical unit: 250m x 250m grid (ETRS89-LAEA)

Percentage of people commutingto voivodship (NUTS2) capitals

statistical unit: gmina (municipality) (LAU2)

STATISTICAL INDICATORSFOR SPATIAL PLANNING

Statistical indicators for spatial planning

Source data

• spatial data

Scope

• selected administrative units

Aims

• Source data usability analysis for purposes of creating statistical indicators for spatial planning• methodology for statistical indicators describing building density• methodology for statistical indicators describing road density

Cartographic presentation of the indicators

Source data

Spatial

•Database of Topographic Objects (buildings and road network)•cadastral data•ortophotomap•Boundaries of statistical regions and census enumeration areas (spatial address databases)•Boundaries of the territorial division of the country

Scope27 gminas (LAU2) from 4 powiats (LAU1) located north of Warsaw

Source data evaluation

• comparing the content of randomly selected grid cells within the Database of Topographic Objects with the ortophotomap

• roads - 59 grid cells sampled out of a total number of 1185– 79,7% cells with total compliance– rest with compliance > 75%

• buildings - 135 grid cells sampledout of a total number of 2697– 44,5% cells with total compliance– 37,8% cells with compliance > 75%– rest majorly with compliance > 50%

• gaps found mainly in urban areas

omissions in the building layer

Building density indicator (%)

areasurveyP

areabuildingtotalP

ratiodensitybuildingW

P

PW

P

Z

Z

P

ZZ

%100

Building density indicator

grid cell with the biggest number of buildings

grid cell with the highest building density ratio

town of Ząbki

city of Wołomin

Road density indicator (km/km2)

areasurveyP

lengthroadtotalD

P

DW

P

D

P

DD

Road density model (m/km2)

CONCLUSIONS

Conclusions

census results referenced to a point (X,Y)

huge opportunity for spatial analyses

geostatistical products that reflect user

needs

high demand for

demographic data lower than LAU2

level

positive reception of project

results

SUCCESS

Conclusions

• The project outcome will have a strong impact on future developments of the Geostatistics Portal (incl. INSPIRE services)

• Wednesday, June 18th, 16:00 @ Room 4„Geostatistics Portal – the multitool for statistics on maps”(session: „Maps, Stats and Observation Data”)

GEO.STAT.GOV.PL

Merging statistics and geospatial information Demography / Commuting / Spatial planning / Registers

Mirosław MigaczChief GIS SpecialistCentral Statistical Office of Poland

@mireslav

www.linkedin.com/in/migacz

m.migacz@stat.gov.pl

www.slideshare.net/MirosawMigacz