Post on 12-Jun-2022
Magnetic Reconnection and Turbulence in Stellar-Convective-Zone-Relevant
Laboratory Plasmas
Jack D. Hare
MAGPIE
MAGPIE: S. V. Lebedev, L. G. Suttle, S. N. Bland, T. Clayson, J. W. D. Halliday, S. Merlini, D. R. Russell, F. Suzuki-Vidal, E. R. Tubman, V. Valenzuela-Villaseca
CERBERUS: R. A. Smith, S. Eardley, T. Robinson, N. StuartGORGON: J. Chittenden, N. Niasse
with N. F. Loureiro (MIT) and A. Ciardi (Sorbonne)
Summary
jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020 2
Magnetic Reconnection with Plasmoids MHD Turbulence
New Diagnostics for Turbulence PUFFIN: A new pulser at MIT
Current sheet
BB
Magnetic Reconnection
3jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
Current sheet
BB
Magnetic Reconnection
4jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
Prediction: 1000 yrs. Reality: 10 minutes!
Plasmoids Lead to Fast Reconnection and Anomalous Heating
Stronglysheared flows
Multiple current sheets
Overview of recent theory:Loureiro, N. F., & Uzdensky, D. A. (2015). PPCF, 58, 014021
BB
Current sheet
5jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
Plasmoids Lead to Fast Reconnection and Anomalous Heating
Stronglysheared flows
Multiple current sheetsBB
Current sheet
6jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
The Convective Zone is a Collisional Plasma (and so is a Z-Pinch)
β’ Collisionless: Solar Flares, MRX, TREX
7jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
πΏ β« πππ >π
πππβ«
π
πππβ«
π£πππππ
πΏ β«π
πππβ«
π
πππ> πππ >
π£πππππ
β’ Collisional: Convective zone, Z-pinch
D. D. Ryutov, IEEE TPS (2015)
Kelvinsong / CC BY-SA
Outline
β’What is magnetic reconnection?
β’Reconnection and Diagnostics on the MAGPIE generator
β’Anomalous heating and the Plasmoid Instability
β’Creating turbulence through flux tube merging
β’Diagnostics for turbulence
β’ The PUFFIN facility
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com 8
Laboratory Reconnection Experiments
9jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
Reconnection Layer
Laserspot
BubbleExpansion
Magnetic Ribbon
Magnetically Driven:B=0.03 T, ne=5x1013 cm-3,
V=10 km/s, L= 10 cmTe= 10 eV, Ti= 10 eV
Ξ²th<<1, Ξ²dyn<<1Long lasting
Laser Driven:B=50 T, ne=7x1019 cm-3,V=500 km/s, L= 0.1 cm,Te= 650 eV, Ti= 250 eV
Ξ²th>>1, Ξ²dyn>>1Transient
Pulsed Power Driven:B=3 T, ne=5x1017 cm-3,V=50 km/s, L= 1 cm
Te= 100 eV, Ti= 500 eV,
Ξ²th βΌ 1, Ξ²dyn βΌ 1Long lasting
Reconnection layer
The MAGPIE Pulsed Power Generator
β’ Constructed 1993
β’ 4 Marx banks: 300 kJ
β’ 1.4 MA peak current
β’ 250 ns rise time
β’ 1 TW into 1 cm3
MAGPIE
Load goes here
10jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
Lebedev et al, Rev. Mod. Phys (2019)
Plasma Source: Exploding Wire Array
jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020 11
Current
I=1.4 MA, 240 ns rise time
Dime for scale
Plasma Source: Exploding Wire Array
jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020 12
Current
B
V
I=1.4 MA, 240 ns rise time
Magnetic Reconnection Setup: Double Exploding Wire Arrays
1.4 MA
13
Suttle, L.G. et al. PRL 2016Hare, J. D. et al. PRL 2017Suttle, L.G. et al. PoP 2017Hare, J. D. et al. PoP 2018Hare, J. D. et al. PoP 2018
β’ Sustained flows
β’ Quasi-2D
β’ Collisional
β’ No guide field
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
Magnetic Reconnection Setup: Double Exploding Wire Arrays
β’ Sustained flows
β’ Quasi-2D
β’ Collisional
β’ No guide field
Suttle, L.G. et al. PRL 2016Hare, J. D. et al. PRL 2017Suttle, L.G. et al. PoP 2017Hare, J. D. et al. PoP 2018Hare, J. D. et al. PoP 2018
14Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
Overview of Diagnostic Suite
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com 15
2 m
Overview of Diagnostic Suite
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com 16
2 m
Diagnostic Setup
17
y
x
y
x
G. F. Swadling et al. RSI (2014)
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
Diagnostic Setup
18
y
x
y
x
G. F. Swadling et al. RSI (2014)
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
Diagnostic Setup
19
z
x
z
x
y
x
y
x
G. F. Swadling et al. RSI (2014)
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
End on Electron Density (Laser Interferometry)
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
y
x 20
Wires
End on Electron Density (Laser Interferometry)
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
y
x 21
End on Electron Density (Laser Interferometry)
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
y
x
A plasmoid
22
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
Magnetic Field Profile (Faraday Rotation Imaging)
23
z
x
10 mm
Magnetic Field Profile (Faraday Rotation Imaging)
24
z
x Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
10 mm
Magnetic Field Profile (Faraday Rotation Imaging)
B B
25
z
x Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
πΌ(π₯, π§) β ΰΆ±πππ©. ππ
B B
Magnetic Field Profile (Faraday Rotation Imaging)
Harris Sheet:
1 mm
z
x
G. F. Swadling et al. RSI (2014)
πΌ(π₯, π§) β ΰΆ±πππ©. ππ
26Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
Velocity and Temperature (Thomson Scattering)
27
Fibre Optic Bundle
Fibre Optic Bundle
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
Overall shift: Vfi
Collective scattering from Ion Acoustic Waves
Velocity and Temperature (Thomson Scattering)
28
Fibre Optic Bundle
Fibre Optic Bundle
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
29
Fibre Optic Bundle
Fibre Optic Bundle
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
Separation: ZTe
Overall shift: Vfi
Collective scattering from Ion Acoustic Waves
Velocity and Temperature (Thomson Scattering)
30
Fibre Optic Bundle
Fibre Optic Bundle
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
Width: Ti
Separation: ZTe
Overall shift: Vfi
Collective scattering from Ion Acoustic Waves
Velocity and Temperature (Thomson Scattering)
31
Fibre Optic Bundle
Fibre Optic Bundle
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
Width: Ti
Separation: ZTe
Overall shift: Vfi
Collective scattering from Ion Acoustic Waves
Velocity and Temperature (Thomson Scattering)
[100 km/s]
Velocity and Temperature (Thomson Scattering)
Ξ»0
32
Fibre Optic Bundle
2 mm
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
Velocity and Temperature (Thomson Scattering)
Ξ»0
33
Fibre Optic Bundle
2 mm
Cold (50 eV)Fast movingΞΞ»=0.6 Γ
V=50 km/s
Hot (600 eV)Stationary
ΞΞ»
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
Velocity and Temperature (Thomson Scattering)
Ξ»0
34
Fibre Optic Bundle Cs= 30 km/s, VA= 70 km/s
2 mm
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
Velocity and Temperature (Thomson Scattering)
Ξ»0
35
Fibre Optic Bundle Cs= 30 km/s, VA= 70 km/s
2 mm
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
Power Balance in the Reconnection Layer
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com 36
ππππΏβ πΈπππ + πΈπππ + πΈπ‘β,π + πΈπ‘β,π β πππ’π‘πΏβ πΈπππ + πΈπ‘β,π + πΈπ‘β,π~50% ~25% ~25% ~40% ~60%
2Ξ΄
2L πππ
πππ’π‘
Anomalous Heating in the Reconnection Layer
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com 37
ππππΏβ πΈπππ + πΈπππ + πΈπ‘β,π + πΈπ‘β,π β πππ’π‘πΏβ πΈπππ + πΈπ‘β,π + πΈπ‘β,π~50% ~25% ~25% ~40% ~60%
Οπ£ππ π β 800 ns
Οπππ β 350 ns
Οππ₯π β 50 ns
Classical heating is too slow:
Οππ₯π βͺ Οπ£ππ π, Οπππ 2Ξ΄
2L πππ
πππ’π‘
Anomalous Heating in the Reconnection Layer
jack.d.hare@gmail.com JPP 2020
ππππΏβ πΈπππ + πΈπππ + πΈπ‘β,π + πΈπ‘β,π β πππ’π‘πΏβ πΈπππ + πΈπ‘β,π + πΈπ‘β,π~50% ~25% ~25% ~40% ~60%
Οπ£ππ π β 800 ns
Οπππ β 350 ns
Οππ₯π β 50 ns
Classical heating is too slow:
Οππ₯π βͺ Οπ£ππ π, Οπππ 2Ξ΄
2L πππ
πππ’π‘
Need a faster mechanism:Plasmoids?
38
Outline
β’What is magnetic reconnection?
β’Reconnection and Diagnostics on the MAGPIE generator
β’Anomalous heating and the Plasmoid Instability
β’Creating turbulence through flux tube merging
β’Diagnostics for turbulence
β’ The PUFFIN facility
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com 39
Plasmoids Visible in Electron Density Maps
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com 40
Region of enhanced density (a βplasmoidβ): Vy=130 km/s
Uniformity of Inflows
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com 41
Uniform inflow density near layer
Magnetic Structure of Plasmoids
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com 42
Magnetic Structure of Plasmoids
43jack.d.hare@gmail.com JPP 2020
βB-dotβ probe
Magnetic Structure of Plasmoids
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com 44
Magnetic Structure of Plasmoids
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com 45
Magnetic Structure of Plasmoids
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com 46
Magnetic Structure of Plasmoids
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com 47
Plasmoids lead to fast reconnection and anomalous heating
Multiple current sheets
Overview of recent theory:Loureiro, N. F., & Uzdensky, D. A. (2015). PPCF, 58, 014021
BB
Current sheet
Plasmoid instability depends on:β’ π = π0πΏππ΄/πππ
[Lundquist number]β’ πΏ/ππ
[current sheet length]
48Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
Stronglysheared flows
Multiple current sheets
Regimes of the Plasmoid instability: Collisional MHD
49Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
Collisional MHD
Plasmoids
PlasmoidsStronglysheared flows
Multiple current sheets
Regimes of the Plasmoid instability: The Semi-Collisional Regime
50Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com
Include two-fluid effects
The Semi-Collisional Plasmoid Instability
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com 51
Baalrud et al. PoP 2011
Outline
β’What is magnetic reconnection?
β’Reconnection and Diagnostics on the MAGPIE generator
β’Anomalous heating and the Plasmoid Instability
β’Creating turbulence through flux tube merging
β’Diagnostics for turbulence
β’ The PUFFIN facility
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com 52
Flux Tube Merging
53jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
Shading: out of plane currentBlack lines: magnetic flux surfaces
From Zhou, Y. et al. (2004). Rev Mod Phys, 76(4), 1015β1035
Flux Tube Merging
54jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
From Zhou, Y. et al. (2004). Rev Mod Phys, 76(4), 1015β1035
Flux Tube Merging
55jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
From Zhou, Y. et al. (2004). Rev Mod Phys, 76(4), 1015β1035
Anisotropy
Power Spectra
Intermittency
Pulsed-power driven Flux Tube Merging
Wire arrays produce flux tubes during initial ablation
From: Martin et al. PoP 2010
Wire cores
56jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
Flux tubes merge on axis to form a turbulent column
Pulsed-power driven Flux Tube Merging
57jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
Flux tubes
From: Martin et al. PoP 2010
Optical Self Emission: Formation of a Turbulent Column
Axial imaging
Wires
5 mm
Long lasting, confined column
58jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
Optical Self Emission: Formation of a Turbulent Column
Axial imaging
Wires
5 mm
59jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
Long lasting, confined column
Dimensionless Parameters
Wires
L = 5 mm
DimensionlessParameters
EstimatedParameters
140 nsne= 5 x 1018 cm-3
Te = 100 eVTi = 200 eVB = 5 TV = 200 km/s
Ξ»ei/L β 0.01Ξ² β 1Re β 2500ReM β 250Pr < 0.1
60jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
Axial Interferometry shows cellular structures
Wires
s0327_185 mm
355 nm laser probing: 200 ns after current startCellular structures
61jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
Side on Shadwography shows cellular structures
62jack.d.hare@gmail.com JPP 2020
Long lasting, confined column
Cellular turbulentstructures
Imploding Wire Array
Outline
β’What is magnetic reconnection?
β’Reconnection and Diagnostics on the MAGPIE generator
β’Anomalous heating and the Plasmoid Instability
β’Creating turbulence through flux tube merging
β’Diagnostics for turbulence
β’ The PUFFIN facility
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com 63
B
V
Pulsed Power Driven Turbulence, jack.d.hare@gmail.com 64
A simple experiment: Plasma flow into a planar obstacle
Imaging Refractometry: Density Fluctuations
65jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
Flow
https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.04682
Flow into planar obstacle
B
Imaging Refractometry: Density Fluctuations
66jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
Flow
https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.04682
Flow into planar obstacleReverse shock forms
B
Planar shock experiment: Aluminium, stable
67jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
Flow
https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.04682
Flow into planar obstacleReverse shock forms
Planar shock experiment: Tungsten, Turbulent
68jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
Flow
https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.04682
Flow into planar obstacle???? forms
New Diagnostics: Imaging Refractometer
69jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
New Diagnostics: Imaging Refractometer
70jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
New Diagnostics: Imaging Refractometer
71jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
Ray d
eflection
angle (m
rad)
30
-30
Space
0
72jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
Flow
Planar shock experiment: Tungsten, Turbulent
Flow
https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.04682
Flow
Planar shock experiment: Tungsten, Turbulent
Space 73jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
Flow
https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.04682
Ray d
eflection
angle (m
rad)
30
-30
0
Measuring the Spectrum of Deflection Angles
Undeflected raysDeflected rays
74jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
Flow
0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2Intensity (a.u.)
Flow
https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.04682
Ray d
eflection
angle (m
rad)
30
-30
0
Measuring the Spectrum of Deflection Angles
Undeflected raysDeflected rays
L
n
n
n
Ln
cr
e
cr
e
22
1
=
FWHM D β 0.75 degrees
Spatialscale
Deflectionangle
Need a theory to link distribution of total deflection angles to the spectrum of density fluctuations
Random walk -> Gaussian
75jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
Flow
0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2Intensity (a.u.)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.04682
Ray d
eflection
angle (m
rad)
30
-30
0
Measuring the Spectrum of Deflection Angles
Undeflected raysDeflected rays
L
n
n
n
Ln
cr
e
cr
e
22
1
=
FWHM D β 0.75 degrees
Spatialscale
Deflectionangle
Need a theory to link distribution of total deflection angles to the spectrum of density fluctuations
Random walk -> Gaussian
But - deflection spectrum notGaussian!
76jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
Flow
0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2Intensity (a.u.)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.04682
Ray d
eflection
angle (m
rad)
30
-30
0
Faraday Rotation Imaging: Out of Plane Magnetic Fields
77
No axial fields in inflowsAxial interferometry
Out of planefields
Local measurements from Thomson Scattering
78
Ion Feature:Collective scattering, 28-points
Electron Feature:Collective and non-collective scattering
Probebeam
Bulk Flow,Electron and iontemperatures
Electron temperature,density
jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020
Outline
β’What is magnetic reconnection?
β’Reconnection and Diagnostics on the MAGPIE generator
β’Anomalous heating and the Plasmoid Instability
β’Creating turbulence through flux tube merging
β’Diagnostics for turbulence
β’ The PUFFIN facility
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com 79
Long drive times required to study instabilities and turbulence
80jack.d.hare@gmail.com JPP 2020
Flux tube mergingPlasmoid Instability
5 mm
Wires
5 mm
Pulsed Power Driven Reconnection, jack.d.hare@gmail.com 81
Emperor Penguin:
4 ft/1.2 m
1.5 MA peak current, 1.5 Β΅s rise time
[MAGPIE: 1.4 MA, 0.25 Β΅s]
Starting January 2021 at MIT
Instabilities and turbulence need time to develop.
Vacuum coaxtransmission lines
Vacuum chamber
PUFFIN: A long drive pulser for fundamental plasma physics
Conclusions
β’ Reconnection and turbulence in collisional HED plasmas
β’ Sub-AlfvΓ©nic reconnection, anomalous heating, plasmoid unstable
β’ Magnetised turbulence with Pr < 1, π½ βΌ 1
β’ New diagnostics to study turbulence in unprecedented detail
β’ PUFFIN: a new long drive pulser for magnetised HED plasmas at MIT
jack.d.hare@gmail.com PPPL 2020 82