Post on 17-Mar-2020
Legacy PhosphorusThe Perplexing Pollution Problem from
People’s Poultry Preference
Amy L. Shober Associate Professor and Extension Specialist
Nutrient Management and Environmental QualityUniversity of Delaware
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
People Increasingly Prefer Poultry
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension 1
0
20
40
60
80
100
Per C
apita
Mea
t C
onsu
mpt
ion
(lbs)
BeefPorkChickenTurkey
National Chicken Council (2015)
Dela…Where?
2University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
Near lots of those people who prefer poultry!
• Annual broiler production exceeds 200 Million
• Proximity to fresh markets• Sussex county 1st in U.S.• Grain crops grown to
support poultry industry• 2012 grain production
– 182,000 acres corn for grain– 168,000 acres soybean
Poultry Rules the Roost in DE
3
Sussex County Broiler Production
Source: USDA-NASS, 2014
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
Artificial Drainage Networks are Common on Delmarva
• Required for production of grain crops in some areas – Poorly drained soils– High water tables
• Mainly open ditch networksengineered to remove excess water
• Conduit for nutrients to sensitive waterbodies
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension 4
Source: DPI, 2012
Grain Imported (2010)Corn = 19 million buSoy = 8 million bu
≈2,728 Tons of Pimported!
Delmarva Grain Yields Unable to Meet Poultry Industry Needs
01020304050607080
Produced Consumed
Gra
in (M
illio
n bu
)
Corn Soybeans
5University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
Grain P
Manure P
Manure P
P Rock
Manure Produced on the Shore Stays on the Shore
6University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
Top SourcesMorocco
IraqChinaAlgeriaSyria
Historical Manure Management• Beneficial recycling of nutrients & organic matter• “Nitrogen-based” application rates• Environmental protection strategies
– Groundwater: nitrate leaching
– Surface waters: soil erosion
– Human health: metals, organics, pathogens….
P?University of Delaware Cooperative Extension 7
0 25 50 75 100 125 150
Manure-PCorn
SoybeansWheatAlfalfa
PotatoesSweet Corn
P Added in 10 Mg ha-1 of Poultry Manure* vs. Crop P Removal (kg ha-1)
Average annual P excessfor poultry manure use in a
corn-soybean rotation:~100 kg P ha-1 yr-1*
N-based Manure Applications Led to Over-application of P
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension 8
*Prior to industry adoption of phytase in feed
Phosphorus Behavior and TransportSoil erosion & particulate P
Subsurfaceflow
Tile flow
P leachingis small Total P – 5%
Crop P harvest15%
Soil P immobilization – 80%
Release ofsoil P dissolved P
9
Soil solutionH2PO4
-Soil solution
H2PO4-
Soil solutionH2PO4
- Al-P & Fe-PAl-P & Fe-PAl-P & Fe-PSATURATED
Build Up of Soil Test PFertilizer PManure P
10
LEGACY P
Delaware Soil Test P Distribution Agronomic Samples
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension 11
FY 2011-2015
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
New Castle Kent Sussex
Low (0-25) Med (26-50) Opt (51-100) Ex (>100)
Relationship Between Soil Test P and Soluble P in Delaware Soils
02468
101214161820
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Solu
ble
P (m
g/kg
)
Mehlich 3 Soil Test P (mg/kg)
SussexKentNew Castle
12
Opt
imum
STP
Ran
ge
Pautler and Sims, 2000
(n = 122)
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
Soluble P is Susceptible to Runoff Losses (Overland Flow)…
0 10 20 30 40 500.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
r = 0.74**
DRP = 0.1 mg L-1
Water soluble P at 0-5 cm (mg kg-1)
Run
off D
RP
(mg
L-1)
Vadas et al. (2005)
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension 13
200
150
100
50
0300 mg kg-1
10 mg kg-1
5 mg kg-1
5 mg L-1
2 mg L-1
0.5 mg L-1
Mehlich-3 P P concentration Drainage ditch
90 %
10%
…and Losses through Artificial Drainage Networks
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
Dep
th b
elow
land
sur
face
(cm
)
14
Slide credit: Ray Bryant (USDA-ARS)
• Delaware Nutrient Management Law 1999– DE Nutrient Management
Commission– Certification– Animal Waste and Nutrient
Management Plans• Poultry industry adopts
phytase feed additive
Pfiesteria Hysteria Leads to Mandatory Nutrient Management
15University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
Delaware Nutrient Management Commission
• Consists of 15 Voting members:– Administrator of Conservation Districts, DNREC– 7 full-time farmers– 1 commercial/agricultural nutrient applicator– 1 commercial nursery industry– 1 golf course/lawn care industry– 2 environmental group representatives– 1 nutrient consultant– 1 public citizen
16University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
• Program Administrator– Chris Brosch
• Environmental Scientists– Bob Coleman– Brooke Walls– Aaron Givens– Clint Gill
DE Department of Agriculture
302-698-4500, 800-282-8685
http://dda.delaware.gov/nutrients/index.shtml
Nutrient Management Program
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension 17
• Current Members– Amy Shober– Jennifer Volk– Sydney Riggi– Terra Eby– Shawn Tingle– Rebecca Rothweiler
• Former Members– Greg Binford– Dave Hansen
UD Nutrient Management Extension Team
18University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
8 Animal Units 10+ Acres Fertilized
Who Is Affected By the Law?
19University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
Golf Courses
Turf & Athletic Fields
Lawn Care Companies
Agriculture
3200 Broilers
8 Beef Cattle
32 Brood Sows
7 Saddle Horses
40 Sheep
Categories for Certification
• Nutrient Generator: Generates nutrients (i.e. litter) but no land-application
• Private Nutrient Handler: Apply nutrients only to privately managed land
• Commercial Nutrient Handler: Apply nutrients as part of a commercial business
• Nutrient Consultant: Writes nutrient management plans
20University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
Certification RequirementsCertification Level
Session I & II
Session III
SessionIV Exam Continuing
EducationNutrient Generator X 6 CEUs every 3 years
PrivateNutrient Handler
X X 6 CEUs every 3 years
Commercial Nutrient Handler
X X X X 6 CEUs every 3 years
Nutrient Consultant X X X X 5 CEUs every year
21University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
What Topics Do We Cover?
Water Quality Manure Storage & Management
Mortality Management
State/Federal Law Basic Soils Fertilizers & Fertility Calculations
22University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
* Indicates the number that completed training and passed the exam.
Certification Program Statistics
23University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
Certification Level
Number of Certifications2001-2003 2004-2013 2013-2016 Total
Nutrient Generator 486 255 136 870
Private Nutrient Handler 1106 424 140 1624
Commercial Nutrient Handler N/A 102 46 145
Nutrient Consultant N/A 93 35 126
All Levels 1592 874 357 2765
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension 24
Impact of Certification
Other Details of the DE Law• Animal Waste and Nutrient Management plan
requirements• Annual Reports• Manure and Fertilizer applications are:
– Limited on “High” phosphorus soils– Prohibited between Dec. 7 and Feb. 15 (exceptions on
a case-by-case basis for dairies with storage issues)• Regulation of Concentrated Animal Feeding
Operations (CAFOs)
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension 25
High Phosphorus Soils• High P soils currently defined as any soil with a
soil test value greater than 150 FIV.– Phosphorus applications are limited to a
THREE-YEAR crop removal rate on soils that are considered high in P, unless…
– Phosphorus Site Index indicates another application method is appropriate.
• The DNMC has recommended the PSI as a BMP (Best Management Practice).
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension 26
Soil Test P Threshold Approach
Steep
Steep
Moderate
Soil Test Phosphorus (lb/acre)
Cro
p R
espo
nse
orEn
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ctAgronomicCritical SoilTest P Value
Environmental Impact
(e.g., P loss in runoff)
CropResponse
“Threshold P Value”
27University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
44
4620
92
Risk Assessment Tools ID Critical Source
Areas177
144
DP78
97
55
0
Tony Buda, USDA-ARS
Soil P – ppmP added – kg P/ha/yrRunoff – litersP loss – kg P/ha/yr
28
1
<1
DP
8
Critical Source Area• Overlap of source & transport indicators• Identify and manage the critical source areas• Phosphorus Index
- ID critical source areas
- Target management changes to high risk areas
- Maximize return on effort
Source Transport
Critical Source Area
Mahantango Creek Watershed, USDA-ARS
90% of P Loss comes from 10% of the watershed
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension 29
The P Index Version 1.0• Developed in 1992 (Lemunyon and Gilbert, 1993)• The initial goals of the P Index were to:
1. Assess the risk of P transport from a field to water body,
2. Identify critical parameters that influence P loss, and
3. Help identify management practices that would decrease P loss from a site.
30University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
The P Index Version 1.0CHARACTERISTIC(Weighting Factor)
PHOSPHORUS LOSS RATING (Value)NONE (0) LOW (1) MED (2) HIGH (4) V. HIGH (8)
Soil Erosion (1.5) N/A <5 5-10 10-15 >15Soil Runoff Class (0.5) N/A Low Medium High Very High
Soil Test P (1.0) N/A Low Medium Optimum ExcessiveP Fertilizer Rate (0.75) None <31 31-90 91-150 >150
P Fertilizer Method (0.5)
None Placed w/ planter >
2 in.
Incorp. <3 mo. before
crop
Inc. >3 mo. before crop;
surface <3 mo.before crop
Surfaceto pasture; >3 monthsbefore crop
Organic P Rate (1.0) None <31 31-90 91-150 >150
Organic P Method (1.0)
None Injected >2 in
Incorp. <3 mo. before
crop
Incorp. >3 mo.before crop;
surface <3 mo.before crop
Surfaceto pasture;
>3 mo.before crop
31University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
• Integral part of agricultural P management
• Written into USDA 590 standard and EPA CAFO rule
• State specific versions
Additive
Multiplicative
ComponentParticulate
Surface
Subsurface
Evolution of the P Index
Source Transport
Source Transport
+
×Source Transport
×
×Source Transport
×Source Transport+
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension 32
Part A – Transport
• Soil Erosion (RUSLE)• Surface Runoff Class• Subsurface Drainage• Leaching Potential• Distance from Water• Priority of Water
Part B – Source
• Soil Test P Level• P Fertilizer Rate• P Fertilizer Application
Method • Organic P Rate• Organic P Application
Method
The DE/MD P Site Index
PSI Rating = (Transport [A]) × (Source [B])
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension 33
Delaware PSI Risk CategoriesPSI Rating
Risk Category
Generalized Interpretation
< 50 Low N-based nutrient management acceptable. Soil P may increase.
51-75 Medium N-based nutrient management no more than 1 year out of 3. P-based nutrient management 2 years out of 3; P applications limited to crop removal or soil test P based application recommendations, whichever is greater.
76-100 High P applications limited to crop removal or soil test P based application recommendations. All practical management practices for reducing P should be implemented.
> 100 Very High No P application*. Active remediation techniques should be implemented to reduce P loss potential.
34University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
NRCS Funded P Index Evaluation
35
Chesapeake Bay
Heartland
Southern States
Single State
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
• Establish 9 benchmarkwatersheds for testing/ evaluation of current P index using actual and modeled data
• Expert panels ID important site conditionsand management practices
• Refine and evaluate new P Indices
Chesapeake Bay CIG Project
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension 36
2011-2015
MD Develops the Phosphorus Management Tool (PMT)
Transport Source
Management
+ +P loss risk of dissolved P by subsurface movement
P loss risk of particulate Pby erosion
P loss risk of dissolved P by surface runoff
Transport Source
Management
Transport Source
Management
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension 37
Nicole Fiorellino, UMD
Maryland PMT Risk CategoriesPSI Rating
Risk Category
Generalized Interpretation
< 50 Low Total P application should be limited to no more than a three-year crop removal rate applied over three years.
51-100 Medium P applications should be limited to the amount expected to be removed from the field by crop harvest or soil-test P based application recommendations.
> 100 High No P application*. Active remediation techniques should be implemented to reduce P loss potential.
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension 38
Maryland P Management Tool Regulations Effective 2015
• P Management Tool (UM-PMT) phased in for new/updated nutrient management plans through 2018
• P application banned to soils with >500 FIV Mehlich 3 P
• Required reporting of soil test data to MDA every 5 years
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension 39
Subsurface Drainage Remains Poorly Understood
• Issues initializing WQ models (SWAT) in Coastal Plain limit P Index evaluation
• EPA pressures other Bay states to adopt UM-PMT approach
• Unable to fully evaluate MD-PMT subsurface transport using WQ data
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension 40
• Limited P load data available for evaluation
• MD-PMT approach appears to be better than DE-PSI approach
• Need more monitoring data
Subsurface Risk
41University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
y = 0.15x - 0.46r² = 0.33
00.5
11.5
22.5
3
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0
y = 2E-09x4.017
r² = 0.72
00.5
11.5
22.5
3
0.0 100.0 200.0
Est.
Dis
solv
ed P
Loa
d in
Ditc
h D
rain
age
(kg/
ha) DE-PSI
MD-PMT
• Inconsistency in scoring across state lines
• Work needed to normalize scores and management
• Soil datasets may provide options for improvement
Discrepancies in Scoring
42University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
MD-PMT MD-PMT2 DE-PSI NC-PLAT VA-PI
P In
dex
Scor
e
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
N-based P-based 1.5x crop removal P-based 2 of 3 years P-based 3 yr crop removal P-based 1 yr crop removal No P application
UMES Subsurface P Transport Research
• Characterize subsurface flow paths and P movement at two ditched field sites on the Delmarva Peninsula (Atlantic Coastal Plain) using conservative tracers (Cl- and Br-) and ERI
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension 43
3D Images of Oct 2015 Event
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences 44
1-Oct 2015@1:10 PM
0
2
4
2
40 2 4 6 82480.2
0.8 1-Oct 2015@3:10 PM
0
2
4
2
4 0 2 4 6 82480.20.8
Changes in conductivity are shown as Log10(σi/σbkg) where i=ith dataset. These images have been scaled to show maximum changes.
3-Oct 2015@8:39 PM
0
2
4
2
4 0 2 4 6 82480.20.8
Scale in meters0.70.5750.450.3250.2
3D View--Tracer Infiltration
45
1-Oct 2015@1:10 PM
03.5
7
0.250.5
0.751.0
1-Oct 2015@3:10 PM
03.5
7
0.250.5
0.751.0
3-Oct 2015@8:39 PM
03.5
7
0.250.5
0.751.0
1.25
--0.7--0.575--0.45--0.325--0.2
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences
Scale in meters
• Understand how soil and hydrology can influence water flow and subsurface nutrient transfers
• Method to assess risk of subsurface P transport for use in next-generation P risk assessment tools
Potential Implications of This Research
46University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
• P Indices help guide management, but do not eliminate the underlying problems:– Regional P imbalance– Legacy P losses from
high P soils• NO current BMPs
address legacy P
P Index is NOT the Solution to the Perplexing Pollution Problem!
47University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
Phosphorus Drawdown Takes a Long Time (Forage > Grain)
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension 48
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
0 kg/ha400 kg/ha800 kg/ha1200 kg/ha1600 kg/ha
Manure applications
Meh
lich
3 P
(mg/
kg)
Fiorellino et al. (2017)
28 years
19 years
Innovative BMPs: Filtration Structures for Treatment of Phosphorus
49University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
UMES Experiment StationEffective for 7-8 months: 25% overall dissolved P removal
Structure has handled flow rates over 100 gpm
University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
Innovative BMPs: Managing Ditch “Dip-Out” Spoils
• Spoils dredged to restore drainage are placedon adjacent field, spread, and incorporated
• Farmers do not like• Mixing spoil and soil near
ditch can reduce soluble P losses and impact less land
50
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences
Innovative BMPs: Si and Other Amendments to Solubilize Soil PAgrowSil (CaSiO4) Switchgrass Ash Silicic Acid
• Applied at 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 Mg Si ha-1 (3 replicates)
• Legacy P is not your grandfather’s problem anymore!
• We’ve improved manure management
• Continued improvement of risk assessment tools
• Still lots to learn!
After Decades of P Research in Delaware and the Mid-Atlantic..
52University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
1
2
43
5
6
7
1. Cornell University2. Penn State Univ./ USDA-ARS3. Univ. of Maryland – College Park4. Univ. of Maryland – Eastern Shore5. Univ. of Delaware6. Virginia Tech7. West Virginia University
Along with…Federal and state agencies; Industry groups; Commodity groups, etc.
Nutrient Management Research through Regional Collaboration
53University of Delaware Cooperative Extension
Cooperators:– Tom Sims– Nicole
Fiorellino– Josh McGrath– Chad Penn– Jennifer Volk– Shawn Tingle– Ray Bryant– Tony Buda– Lee Slater– Art Allen
– Doug Beegle
– Doug Beegle– Quirine
Ketterings– Tom Basden– Frank Coale– Pete Kleinman
Graduate Students:– Kathryn Clark– Zhixuan Qin– Melissa Savin
Funding provided by:– USDA-NRCS– DE Department of Natural
Resources and Environmental Control
– Delmarva Land Grant University Seed Grant
Work Completed at:– National Synchrotron
Light Source– Advanced Photon Source
Acknowledgements
54University of Delaware Cooperative Extension