div class=trans-pagebuttonPage 1button div class=trans-image amp-img class=trans-thumb alt=Page 1: KM C364e-20170309070352 · disputes were referred to adjudication in terms of the JBCC Contract The respondent in its opposing affidavit and in argument contends src=https:reader030fdocumentsusreader030viewer20220204125b2eb6a47f8b9a91438c22a0html5thumbnails1jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=trans-pagebuttonPage 2button div class=trans-image amp-img class=trans-thumb alt=Page 2: KM C364e-20170309070352 · disputes were referred to adjudication in terms of the JBCC Contract The respondent in its opposing affidavit and in argument contends src=https:reader030fdocumentsusreader030viewer20220204125b2eb6a47f8b9a91438c22a0html5thumbnails2jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=trans-pagebuttonPage 3button div class=trans-image amp-img class=trans-thumb alt=Page 3: KM C364e-20170309070352 · disputes were referred to adjudication in terms of the JBCC Contract The respondent in its opposing affidavit and in argument contends src=https:reader030fdocumentsusreader030viewer20220204125b2eb6a47f8b9a91438c22a0html5thumbnails3jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=trans-pagebuttonPage 4button div class=trans-image amp-img class=trans-thumb alt=Page 4: KM C364e-20170309070352 · disputes were referred to adjudication in terms of the JBCC Contract The respondent in its opposing affidavit and in argument contends src=https:reader030fdocumentsusreader030viewer20220204125b2eb6a47f8b9a91438c22a0html5thumbnails4jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=trans-pagebuttonPage 5button div class=trans-image amp-img class=trans-thumb alt=Page 5: KM C364e-20170309070352 · disputes were referred to adjudication in terms of the JBCC Contract The respondent in its opposing affidavit and in argument contends...