Post on 09-Feb-2022
Kinetic Quantum Theory of Gravity Fran De Aquino
Maranhao State University, Physics Department, S.Luis/MA, Brazil.Copyright 2002-2004 by Fran De Aquino
All Rights Reserved
Gravity is here quantized starting from the generalization of the action function. This leads toan equation of correlation between gravitational and inertial masses, which depends on theparticle's kinetic energy. We show that there is a reaffirmation of the strong equivalenceprinciple and consequently the Einstein's equations are preserved. In fact such equationsare deduced here directly from this kinetic approach to Gravity. Moreover, we have obtaineda generalized equation for inertial forces, which incorporates the Mach's principle intoGravitation. Also, we have deduced the equation of Entropy; the Hamiltonian for a particle inan electromagnetic field and the reciprocal fine structure constant. It is possible to deducethe expression of the Casimir force and also to explain the Inflation Period and the MissingMatter without assuming the existence of vacuum fluctuations. This new approach forGravity will allow us to understand some crucial matters in Cosmology.
1. INTRODUCTION
Quantum Gravity was originally studied, byDirac and others, as the problem ofquantizing General Relativity. Thisapproach has many difficulties, detailed byIsham [1]. In the 1970's physicists tried aneven more conventional approach: simplifythe Einstein's equations by pretending thatthey are almost linear, and then apply thestandard methods of quantum field theoryto the thus-oversimplified equations. Butthis method, too, failed. In the 1980's avery different approach, known as stringtheory, became popular. For a while thereare many enthusiasts of string theory.But the mathematical difficulties instring theory are formidable, and it is farfrom clear that they will be resolved anytime soon. At the end of 1997 Isham [2]pointed out several "Structural ProblemsFacing Quantum Gravity Theory". At thebeginning of this new century, theproblem of quantizing the gravitationalfield was still open. In this work we propose a newapproach to Quantum Gravity where
gravity is quantized starting from thegeneralization of the action function for aparticle. The Einstein's equations of theGeneral Relativity are deduced directlyfrom this theory of Quantum Gravity. Also,it leads to a complete description of theElectromagnetic Field, providing aconsistent unification of gravity withelectromagnetism.
2. THEORY
We start with the action for a free-particle that, as we know, is given by:
∫−=b
adsS α
where α is a quantity whichcharacterize the particle, and must bealways positive for all the particles. In Relativistic Mechanics, the action
2can be written in the following form [3]:
dtcVcLdtSt
t
t
t∫ ∫ −−== 2
1
2
1
221α
where221 cVcL −−= α
is the Lagrange's function. In Classical Mechanics theLagrange's function for a free-particle is,as we know, given by: 2aVL = where Vis the speed of the particle and a aquantity hypothetically [4] given by :
2ma =where m is the mass of the particle.However, there is no distinction about thekind of mass ( if gravitational mass, gm , or
inertial mass im ) neither about its sign( )± .
The correlation between a and αcan be established based on the fact thaton the limit ∞→c the relativisticexpression for L must be reduced to theclassic expression 2aVL = . The result [5]
is : cVL 22α= . Therefore, if ac2=α we
obtain 2aVL = . Since α must be always positive,the quantity ca 2α= must also bealways positive. Hence, a rigorousmathematical definition of a must be
expressed as a function of m instead of
m . Moreover, we must decide if gmm =or imm = . We will see in this work that
the definition of gm includes im . Thus the
right option is gm , i.e.,
.ma g 2=
Consequently, cmg=α and the
generalized expression for the action for afree-particle will have the following form:
( )1∫−=b
ag dscmS
or
( )212
1
2
1
222 ∫∫ =−−=t
t
t
t g LdtdtcVcmS
where the Lagrange's function is
( )31 222 .cVcmL g −−= The momentum, as we know, is the
vector VLp
∂∂= . Thus from the Eq.(3)we obtain:
( )41 22
.VMcV
Vmp g
g =
−=
The derivate dtpd
is the inertial
force iF which acts on the particle. If the
force is perpendicular to the speed wehave
( )51 22
.dt
Vd
cV
mF
g
i
−
=
However, if the force and the speed havethe same direction, we find that
( ) ( )61 2
322
.dt
Vd
cV
mF
g
i
−
=
From Mechanics [6] we know that
LVp −⋅
denotes the energy of theparticle, thus we can write
( )71
2
22
2
.cMcV
cmLVpE g
g
g =−
=−⋅=
This fundamental equation presents theconcept of Gravitational Energy, gE , in
addition to the well-known concept ofInertial Energy, iE , and shows that gE is
not null for 0=V , but it has the finite value
( )8200 cmE gg =
This is the particle's gravitational energyat rest. The Eq.(7) can be rewritten in thefollowing form:
( ) ( )9
1
1
00
0
2022
202
00
2
22
2
2
ii
g
Kiii
g
E
ii
ii
g
g
g
gg
Em
mEE
m
m
cmcV
cmcm
m
m
cmcV
cmcmE
Ki
=+=
=
−
−+=
=−−
+=
By analogy to the Eq.(8), 200 cmE ii = into the
equation above, is the inertial energyat rest. Thus, Kiii EEE += 0 is the total
inertial energy, where KiE is the kineticinertial energy. From the Eqs.(7) and (9)we thus obtain
3
( )101
2
22
20 .cM
cV
cmE i
ii =
−=
For small velocities ( )cV << , we obtain
( )11202
120 VmcmE iii +≈
where we recognize the classicalexpression for the kinetic inertial energy ofthe particle. The expression for the kineticgravitational energy, KgE , is easily
deduced by comparing of the Eqs.(7) and(9). The result is
( )120
.Em
mE Ki
i
g
Kg =
In the presented picture, we can saythat the gravity , g
, into a gravitational field
produced by a particle of gravitationalmass gm depends on the particle's
gravitational energy, gE ( given by Eq.(7)),
because we can write
( )13222
2
22 r
MG
cr
cMG
cr
EGg
ggg −=−=−=
where ( ) 21
221−
−= cVmM gg is the
relativistic gravitational mass defined inthe Eqs.(4)and (7). On the other hand, as we know, thegravitational force is conservative. Thus,gravitational energy, in agreement with theenergy conservation law, can beexpressed by the decrease of the inertialenergy, i.e.,
( )14ig EE ∆∆ −=This equation expresses the fact that thedecrease of gravitational energycorresponds to an increase of the inertialenergy. Therefore a variation iE∆ in iE
yields a variation ig EE ∆∆ −= in gE . Thus
iii EEE ∆+= 0 ; igggg EEEEE ∆∆ −=+= 00 and
( )1500 igig EEEE +=+Comparison between (7) and (10) showsthat 00 ig EE = . Consequently we have
( )162 000 iigig EEEEE =+=+However, Kiii EEE += 0 .Thus (16) becomes
( )170 .EEE Kiig −=Note the symmetry in the equations of
iE and gE .Substitution of Kiii EEE −=0
into (17) yields( )182 Kigi EEE =−
Squaring the Eqs.(4) and (7) andcomparing the result, we find the followingcorrelation between gravitational energyand momentum :
( )192222
2
.cmpc
Eg
g +=
The energy expressed as a function of themomentum is, as we know, calledHamiltonian or Hamilton's function:
( )20222 .cmpcH gg += It is known that starting from theSchrödinger equation we may obtain thewell-known expression for energy of aparticle in periodic motion inside a cubicalbox of edge length L [ 7 ]. The resultnow is
( )213218 2
22
,...,,nLM
hnE
g
n ==
This is the total energy of theparticle inside the box. Equation (7) is theexpression for the total energy of theparticle. Comparison between (7) and (21)leads to
( )228cL
nhM g =
From this equation we conclude thatthere is a minimum value for gM
given by
( ) ( )238max
mingcL
hM =
where maxL is the maximum edgelength of a cubical box whosemaximum diameter
( )243maxmax Ld =is equal to the maximum "diameter" ofthe Universe. The relativistic gravitational
mass ( ) 21
221−
−= cVmM gg , defined
in the Eqs.(4) and (7), shows that
( ) ( ) ( )250 mingming mM =
4 The box normalization leads toconclusion that the propagation
number λπ2== kk
is restricted to
the values Lnk π2= . This isdeduced assuming an arbitrarily largebut finite cubical box of volume 3L [8].
Thus we haveλnL =
From this equation we conclude that
min
maxmax
Ln
λ=
and
minminminmin nL λλ ==Since 1=minn . Therefore we can writethat
( )26minmaxmax LnL =From this equation we thus concludethat
( )27minnLL =or
( )28n
LL max=
Multiplying (27) and (28) by 3 and
reminding that 3Ld = , we obtain
( )29n
ddorndd max
min ==
Equations above show that the length(and therefore the space) is quantized. From (22) we can also concludethat
( ) ( )308min
maxmaxg
cL
hnM =
Equation (26) tells us thatmaxmaxmin nLL = . Thus Eq.(30) can be
written as follows
( ) ( )318
2
max
maxmaxgcL
hnM =
Comparison of (31) with (23) showsthat
( ) ( ) ( )322mingmaxmaxg MnM =
Equation (25) shows that
( ) ( )mingming mM 0= . Thus we obtain
( ) ( )mingmaxmaxg mnM 02=
which leads to following conclusion
( ) ( )3302
mingg mnM =
This equation shows that thegravitational mass is quantized. Notethat the equation above does notpresents negative values for gM
because it has been derived from theEq.(21) for 0>gM . Further on it will
be shown that gM can be negative.
Thus for 0<gM Eq.(21) gives222 8 LMhnE gn −= whence we obtain
( )mingg mnM 02−= . Thus the complete
equation must be
( ) ( )3402
mingg mnM ±=
Substitution of (34) into (13) leads toquantization of gravity, i.e.,
( )
( )( )354
2
022
min
max
mingg
gn
nr
mGn
r
MGg
±=
=
−±=−=
From the Hubble's law followsthat
( )2maxmaxmax dH~
lH~
V ==
( )2minminmin dH~
lH~
V ==whence
min
max
min
max
d
d
V
V=
Equations (29) tell us thatmaxminmax ndd = . On the other hand we
know that cVmax = . Thus the equationabove gives
5
maxmin
n
cV =
which leads to following conclusion
( )36n
cV =
this equation shows that velocity isalso quantized. The temporal coordinate 0x ofthe space-time is ctx =0 . Substitutionof nVc = into this equation yields
( )372 101
n
t
n
H~
l
x
n
H~
t max==
=
−−
which shows the quantization of time. Now let us go back to Eq. (20)which will be called the gravitationalHamiltonian to distinguish it from theinertial Hamiltonian iH :
( )3822
02 .cmpcH ii +=
Consequently, the Eq. (18) can berewritten in the following form:
( )392 igi HHH ∆=−where iH∆ is the variation on theinertial Hamiltonian or inertial kineticenergy. A momentum variation p∆yields a variation iH∆ given by:
( ) ( )4042
02242
022 cmcpcmcppH iii +−++= ∆∆
Substituting Eqs.(20), (38) and (40)into (39) and making 0=p , we obtain
.cmcmcpcmcm iiig
−+=− 20
42
0222
02 2 ∆
From this equation we derive thegeneral expression of correlationbetween the gravitational and inertialmass, i.e.,
( )41112 0
2
00 .m
cm
pmm i
i
ig
−
+−= ∆
Note that for ( )250 cmp i>∆ the
value of gm becomes negative. Note
also that Eq.(41) gives similar resultsfor matter and anti-matter ( ii mm =− ).
Equation (41) can also beexpressed in terms of velocity V of
the particle. Starting from Eq.(4) wecan write:
( )( )( )
( ) 221 cVV
VVmmpp
gg
∆
∆∆∆
+−
+−=+
For 0=V ; 0=p . Thus the equationabove reduces to:
( ) ( )21 cVVmmp gg ∆∆∆∆ −−=From the Eq.(16) we obtain:
( ) iiiiiiig EEEEEEEE ∆∆ −=+−=−= 0000 22
However, Eq.(14) tells us that
gi EE ∆∆ =− ; it leads to gig EEE ∆+= 0 or
gig mmm ∆+= 0 . Thus, in the
expression of p∆ we can replace
( )gg mm ∆− by 0im , i.e.,
( )20 1 cVVmp i ∆∆∆ −=
We can therefore write
( )( )42
1 20 cV
cV
cm
p
i −=∆
By substitution of the expression aboveinto Eq.(41) we thus obtain:
( ) ( )43112 022
021
iig mcVmm
−−−=
−
For 0=V the Eq.(43) gives
00 igg mmm ==Therefore, the previously obtainedquantized relation (33), ( )mingg mnM 0
2= ,
becomes
( ) ( )4402
0 minii mnm =which shows the quantization of inertialmass. Finally, by dividing both
members of Eq.(43) by 221 cV− wereadily obtain
( ) ( )45112 21
22iig McVMM
−−−=
−
Henceforth, by simplicity the index zeroof 0im will be omitted. The Lorentz's force is usuallywritten in the following form:
6BVqEqdtPd
×+=
where 221 cVVmP i −=
. However,
Eq.(4) tell us that 221 cVVmp g −=
.
Therefore, the expressions abovemust be corrected by multiplying itsmembers by ig mm ,i.e.,
pcV
Vm
cV
Vm
m
m
m
mP
gi
i
g
i
g =
−=
−=
2222 11
and
( ) ( )46i
g
i
g
m
mBVqEq
m
mP
dt
d
dt
pd ×+=
=
That is now the general expression forLorentz's force. When the force is perpendicularto the speed, the Eq.(5) gives
( ) 221 cVdtVdmdtpd g −=
.By comparing
with Eq.(46) we thus obtain
( )( ) BVqEqdtVdcVmi
×+=− 221
Starting from this equation, well-known experiments have been carriedout in order to verify the relativistic
expression: 221 cVmi − . In particular, we can look on themomentum variation ( )p∆ as due toabsorption or emission ofelectromagnetic energy by the particle( by means of radiation and/or bymeans of Lorentz's force upon thecharge of the particle). In the case of radiation (anytype), p∆ can be obtained as follows. Itis known that the radiation pressure ,dP, upon an area dxdydA= of avolume dxdydzdV = of a particle ( theincident radiation normal to the surfacedA ) is equal to the energy dUabsorbed per unit volume ( )dVdU .i.e.,
( )47dAdz
dU
dxdydz
dU
dV
dUdP ===
Substitution of vdtdz = ( v is the
speed of radiation) into the equationabove gives
( ) ( )48v
dD
v
dAdtdU
dV
dUdP ===
Since dFdPdA = we can write:
( )49v
dUdFdt=
However we know that dtdpdF = , then
( )50v
dUdp =
From Eq.(48) follows that
( )51v
dVdDdPdVdU ==
Substitution into (50) yields
( )522v
dVdDdp =
or
∫ ∫∫ =D Vp
dVdDv
dp0 020
1∆
whence
( )532v
VDp =∆
This expression is general for all typesof waves. Including no-electromagneticwaves like sound waves. In this case,v in Eq.(53), will be the speed ofsound in the medium and D theintensity of the sound radiation. In the case of electromagneticwaves, the Electrodynamics tells usthat v will be given by
( )
++===
112
2ωεσµεκω
rrr
c
dt
dzv
Where rk is the real part of the
propagation vector k
; ir ikkkk +==
;
ε , µ and σ, are the electromagneticcharacteristics of the medium in whichthe incident (or emitted) radiation ispropagating ( 0εεε r= where rε is therelative dielectric permittivity and
mF /10854.8 120
−×=ε ; 0µµµ r= where
rµ is the relative magnetic permeability
and m/H70 104 −×= πµ ; σ is the
electrical conductivity). For an atominside a body , the incident(or emitted)
7radiation on this atom will bepropagating inside the body , andconsequently , σ=σbody , ε=εbody, µ=µbody. It is then evident that the indexof refraction vcnr = will be given by
( ) ( )54112
2
++== ωεσµε rrr v
cn
On the other hand, from Eq.(50)follows that
rnc
U
c
c
v
Up =
=∆
Substitution into Eq.(41) yields
( )551121
2
2 ir
i
g mncm
Um
î
−
+−=
For ωεσ >> , the expression (54) gives
( )564
2
f
c
v
cnr π
µσ==
Substitution of (56) into (55) leads to
i
i
g mcm
U
fm
î
−
+−= 1
4121
2
πµσ
This equation shows that atoms offerromagnetic materials with very-highµ can have its gravitational massesstrongly reduced by means ofExtremely Low Frequency (ELF)electromagnetic radiation. It alsoshows that atoms of superconductingmaterials (due to very-high σ ) canalso have its gravitational massesstrongly reduced by means of ELFelectromagnetic radiation. Alternatively, we may putEq.(55) as a function of the powerdensity ( or intensity ), D , of theradiation. The integration of (51) gives
vVDU = . Thus we can write (55) inthe following form:
( )5711212
3
2
ir
g mc
Dnm
î
−
+−=
ρ
where Vmi=ρ .
For ωεσ >> , rn will be given by(56) and consequently (57) becomes
( )5814
1212
ig mcf
Dm
î
−
+−=
ρπµσ
The vector ( )vVUD
= , which we maydefine from (48), has the samedirection of the propagation vector k
and evidently corresponds to thePoynting vector. Then D
can be
replaced by HE
× .Thus we can write( ) ( )[ ] ( ) 21 EvvEEBEEHD µµµ ==== .
For ωεσ >> the Eq.(54) tells us thatµσπfv 4= consequently we obtain
µπσf
ED4
2=
This expression refers to theinstantaneous values of D and E .The average value for 2E is equal to
22
1mE because E varies sinusoidaly
( mE is the maximum value for E ).Consequently equation above tells usthat the average density D is given by
µπσf
ED m 42
21=
Substitution of this expression into (58)yields the expression for gm .
Substitution of the expression of Dinto (58) gives
( ) ( ) ( )5914121 322ig mfcEm
î
−+−= πσρµ
Note that for extremely-low frequenciesthe value of 3−f in this equationbecomes highly expressive. Some oscillators like theHP3325A ( Op.002 High VoltageOutput ) can generate sinusoidalvoltages with extremely-lowfrequencies down to Hzf 6101 −×=and amplitude up to 20V. On the otherhand, there is a vinyl compoundcalled Duracap 86103 whosedensity is 31400 −= m.kgρ and theelectrical properties are: 3=rε ;
1=rµ ; mm/KV.strengthdieletric 498= ;m/S.393=σ (electrical conductivity).
8Then consider a HP3325A connectedto a capacitor whose dielectric is a diskof Duracap 86103 ( 5 mm thickness).When a sinusoidal voltage
ftsinVV map π2= , is applied at the
terminals of this capacitor, the electricfield E inside the dielectric is
l
VE
r
ap
ε=
where l is the thickness of thedielectric. Therefore, the gravitational massof the dielectric, ( )diegm , in agreement
with (59), is given by
( ) ( )[ ] ( )dieiapdieg mfV.m 11075121 3420 −×+−= −
where ( )dieim is the initial inertial mass
of the dielectric( Duracap disk). For HzHzf 6101 −== µ theequation above shows that thegravitational mass of the dielectricbecomes negative if V.Vap 12> ; for
V.Vap 72≅ , ( ) ( )dieidieg mm −≅ .
Let us now return to the theory. The equivalence betweenframes of non-inertial reference andgravitational fields presupposed
ig mm ≡ because the inertial forces
was given by amF ii
= , while the
equivalent gravitational forces,by gmF gg
= . Thus, to satisfy the
equivalence ( ga
≡ and gi FF ≡
) it was
necessary that ig mm ≡ . Now, the inertial
force, iF
, is given by Eq.(6), and from the
Eq.(13) we can obtain the gravitational
force, gF
. Thus, gi FF
≡ leads to
( ) ( )
( ) ( ) 23
23
23
22222
2222222
11
111
cV
mg
cV
m
r
mG
cV
m
cVr
mGa
cV
m
ggg
ggg
−≡
−
′
′≡
≡−−′
′≡
−
whence results
ga
≡
Consequently, the equivalence isevident, and therefore the Einstein'sequations from the General Relativitycontinue obviously valid. The new expression for iF
(Eqs.(5) and (6)) shows that the inertialforces are proportional to thegravitational mass, gm . This means
that these forces result from thegravitational interaction between theparticle and the other gravitationalmasses of the Universe, just asMach’s principle predicts. Thereforethe new expression for the inertialforces incorporates the Mach’sprinciple into Gravitation Theory, andfurthermore reveals that the inertialeffects upon a particle can be reducedbecause, as we have seen, thegravitational mass may be reduced.When ig mm = the nonrelativistic
equation for inertial forces, amF gi
= ,
reduces to amF ii
= . This is the well-
known Newton's second law formotion. In Einstein's Special RelativityTheory the motion of a free-particle isdescribed by means of 0=Sδ [9]. Nowbased on Eq.(1), 0=Sδ will be givenby the following expression
∫ =−= .dscmS g 0δδwhich also describes the motion of theparticle inside the gravitational field.Thus, the Einstein's equations from theGeneral Relativity can be derivedstarting from ( ) 0=+ gm SSδ , where
gS and mS refer to action of the
gravitational field and the action of thematter, respectively [10]. The variations gSδ and mSδ can
be written as follows[11]:
9
( ) ( )6016 2
13
Ωδπ
δ dggRgRG
cS ik
ikikg −−= ∫( )61
2
1 Ωδδ dggTc
S ikikm −−= ∫
where ikR is the Ricci's tensor; ikg the
metric tensor and ikT the matter'senergy-momentum tensor:
( ) ( )62ikkigik PgPT ++= µµε
where P is the pressure and 2cgg ρε =is now, the density of gravitationalenergy, gE , of the particle; gρ is then
the density of gravitational mass of theparticle, i.e., gm at the volume unit.
Substitution of (60) and (61) into0=+ gm SS δδ yields
( ) 016
48
21
3
=−−−∫ Ωδπ
π dggTRgRG
c ikikc
Gikik
whence,( ) ( )6304
821 =−− ikc
Gikik TRgR π
because the ikgδ are arbitrary. The Eqs.(63) in the followingforms;
( )6448
21
ikcG
ikik TRgR π=−or
( )6548
21 .TRgR k
ic
Gki
ki
πδ =−are the Einstein's equations from theGeneral Relativity. Making on the obtainedequations for the gravitational field, thetransition to the Classical Mechanics,we obtain:
( )66442 g
gG
cG ρπ
επ∆Φ =
=
This is the nonrelativistic equation forthe gravitational field, whose generalsolution is
( )672∫−=
rc
dVG
gεΦ
This equation express thenonrelativistic potential of thegravitational field for any distribution ofmass. In particular, for only oneparticle with gravitational energy
2cmE gg = , the result is
( )682rcGEg−=ΦThus, the gravity g
into the
gravitational field created by theparticle is
( )69222
.r
mG
cr
EG
rg
gg −=−=
∂∂−= Φ
Therefore, the gravitational force gF
which acts on that field, upon anotherparticle of gravitational mass gm′ is
then given by:
( )702r
mmGgmF
gg
gg ′
−=′=
If 0<gm or 0<′gm the force will be
repulsive; the force will never be nulldue to the existence of a minimumvalue for gm (see Eq. (25)). However,
if ( )00 <′< gg mandm or
( )00 >′> gg mandm the force will
be attractive. Just for ig mm = and
ig mm ′=′ we obtain the Newton's
attraction law. Since the gravitational interactioncan be repulsive, besides attractive,such as the electromagneticinteraction, then the graviton musthave spin 1 and not 2. Consequently,the gravitational forces are also gaugeforces because they are yield by theexchange of so-called "virtual" quantaof spin 1, such as the electromagneticforces and the weak and strongnuclear forces. Let us now deduce the EntropyDifferential Equation starting from theEq.(55). Comparison of the Eqs.(55)and (41) shows that pcUnr ∆= . For
small velocities ( )cV << , cmp i<<∆ ,
so that 2cmUn ir << . Under these
circumstances, the development of theEq.(55) in power of ( )2cmUn ir , gives
10
( )71
2
2 i
i
rig m
cm
Unmm
−=
In the particular case of thermalradiation, it is usual to relate theenergy of the photons to temperature,through the relationship kTh ≈νwhere KJ.k 2310381 −×= is theBoltzmann's constant. Thus, in thatcase, the energy absorbed by theparticle will be kThU ηνη ≈= ,
where η is a particle-dependentabsorption/emission coefficient.Therefore, Eq.(71) may be rewritten inthe following form:
( )722
22
2 i
i
rig m
m
T
c
knmm
−=
η
For electrons at T=300K, we have
172
22
210−≈
e
r
m
T
c
kn η
Comparing Eq.(72) with Eq.(18), weobtain
( )732
1 22
.m
T
c
knE
i
rKi
=
η
The derivative of KiE with respect totemperature T is
( ) ( ) ( )742ir
Ki mTcknT
E η=∂
∂
Thus,( ) ( )75
2
2
cm
kTn
T
ET
i
rKi η=
∂∂
Substitution of 0iiKi EEE −= intoEq.(75) gives
( ) ( )762
20
cm
kTn
T
E
T
ET
i
rii η=
∂∂+
∂∂
By comparing the Eqs.(76) and (73)and considering that 00 =∂∂ TEi
because 0iE does not depends on T ,the Eq.(76) reduces to
( ) ( )772 Kii ETET =∂∂ However, Eq.(18) shows that
giKi EEE −=2 therefore Eq.(77) becomes
( ) ( )78TETEE iig ∂∂−=Here, we can identify the energy iE
with the free-energy of the system-Fand gE with the internal energy of the
system-U, thus we can write theEq.(78) in the following form:
( ) ( )79TFTFU ∂∂−=This is the well-known equation ofThermodynamics. On the other hand,remembering UQ ∂+∂=∂ τ (1st
principle of Thermodynamics) and( )80TSUF −=
(Helmholtz's function), we can easilyobtain from (79), the followingequation:
( )81.STQ ∂+∂=∂ τFor isolated systems, 0=∂τ , we thushave
( )82STQ ∂=∂which is the well-know EntropyDifferential Equation. Let us now consider the Eq.(55)in the ultra-relativistic case where theinertial energy of the particle
2cME ii = is very greater than its
inertial energy at rest 2cmi .
Comparison between (4) and (10)leads to 2cVEp i=∆ which, inthe ultra-relativistic case, gives
cMcEcVEp iii ≅≅= 2∆ . On the
other hand, comparison between (55)and (41) shows that pcUnr ∆= . Thus
22 cmcMpcUn iir >>≅=∆ . Consequently,
Eq.(55) reduces to( )832 2cUnmm rig −=
Therefore, the action for such particle,in agreement with the Eq.(2), is
( )[ ] ( )84121
12
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
22222
2222
222
∫∫∫
−+−−=
=−+−=
=−−=
t
t ri
t
t ri
t
t g
.dtcVUncVcm
dtcVccUnm
dtcVcmS
The integrant function is theLagrangean, i.e.,
11( )85121 22222 cVUncVcmL ri −+−−=
Starting from the Lagrangean we canfind the Hamiltonian of the particle, bymeans of the well-known generalformula:
( ) .LVLVH −∂∂=The result is:
( ) ( )861
24
1 22
22
22
2
.cV
cVUn
cV
cmH r
i
−
−+
−=
The second term on the right hand sideof the Eq.(86) results from theparticle's interaction with theelectromagnetic field. Note thesimilarity between the obtainedHamiltonian and the well-knownHamiltonian for the particle in aelectromagnetic field[12]:
( )871 222 .QcVcmH i ϕ+−=in which Q is the electric charge andϕ , the field's scalar potential. Thequantity ϕQ expresses, as we know,the particle's interaction with theelectromagnetic field. Such as thesecond term on the right hand side of theEq.(86). It is therefore evident that it is thesame quantity, expresses by means ofdifferent variables. Thus, we can conclude that, inultra-high energy conditions( )22 cmcMUn iir >≅ ,the gravitational
and electromagnetic fields can bedescribed by the same Hamiltonian, i.e.,in these circumstances they are unified ! It is known that starting from thatHamiltonian we may obtain a completedescription of the electromagnetic field.This means that from the present theoryfor gravity we can also derive theequations of the electromagnetic field.
Due to 2cMpcUn ir ≅= ∆ the
second term on the right hand side of theEq.(86) can be written as follows
( )
( )
2200
2
22
22
22
22
144
1
24
1
24
cVr
R
QQQ
cMcV
cV
cV
cVpc
i
−
′=
′==
=
−
−=
=
−
−
πεπεϕ
∆
whence
( )r
QQcMcV i
0
222
424
πε′
=−
The factor ( )24 22 −cV becomes equal to2 in the ultra-relativistic case, then followsthat
( )884
20
2
r
QQcM i πε
′=
From (25) we know that there is aminimum value for iM given by
( ) ( )minimini mM 0= . Equation (23) shows
that ( ) maxmaxming cdhcLhm 8380 ==
and Eq.(43) shows that ( ) ( )miniming mm 00 = .
Thus we can write
( ) ( ) ( )89830 maxminimini cdhmM ==
According to (88) the value ( )22 cM mini is
correlated to ( ) maxminmin rQrQQ 02
0 44 πεπε =′, i.e.,
( ) ( )9024
2
0
2
cMr
Qmini
max
min =πε
where minQ is the minimum electric chargein the Universe ( therefore equal tominimum electric charge of the quarks,i.e., e3
1 ); maxr is the maximum distance
between Q and Q′ , which should be
equal to the so-called "diameter", cd , of
the visible Universe ( maxc ld 2= where
maxl is obtained from the Hubble's law for
cVmax = , i.e., 1−= H~
clmax ). Thus from
(90) we readily obtain
12
( )( )
( )91
96
24
31
120
0
e
dH~
hc
ddhcQ
max
maxcmin
=
==
==−πε
πε
whence we findm.dmax
301043 ×=This will be the maximum "diameter" thatthe Universe will reach. Consequently,Eq.(89) tells us that the elementaryquantum of matter is
( ) kg.cdhm maxmini73
0 109383 −×== Now by combination of gravity andthe uncertainty principle we will derive theexpression of the Casimir force. An uncertainty im∆ in im
produces an uncertainty p∆ in p and
therefore an uncertainty gm∆ in gm ,
which according to Eq.(41) , is given by
( )92112
2
ii
ig mcm
pmm ∆
∆∆∆∆
−
+−=
From the uncertainty principle for positionand momentum, we know that the productof the uncertainties of the simultaneouslymeasurable values of correspondingposition and momentum components is atleast of the order of magnitude of
, i.e.,
~rp∆∆Substitution of r~p ∆∆
into (92) yields
( )931122
ii
ig mr
cmmm ∆
∆∆
∆∆
−
+−=
Therefore if
( )94cm
ri∆
∆
<<
then the expression (93) reduces to:
( )952rc
mg ∆∆
−≅
Note that gm∆ does not depend on gm .
Consequently, the uncertainty F∆in the gravitational force 2rmGmF gg ′−= ,
will be given by
( )
( ) ( ) ( )962
322
2
−=
=′
−=
c
G
r
hc
r
r
mmGF gg
∆∆π
∆∆∆
∆
The amount ( ) m.cG 353 1061121 −×=
is
called the Planck length, planckl ,( the length
scale on which quantum fluctuations of themetric of the space time are expected tobe of order unity). Thus, we can write theexpression of F∆ as follows
( )
( )
( ) ( )97480
960
480
2
40
224
24
r
hcA
lr
hc
lr
hcF
planck
planck
∆π
π∆π
∆π∆
−=
=
−=
=
−=
or
( )98480 4
00 r
hcAF
−= π
which is the expression of the Casimir
force for ( ) 220 960 plancklAA π== .
This suggests that 0A is anelementary area related to existence of a
minimum length planckmin lk~
d = . What is in
accordance with the quantization of space(29) which point out the existence of
mind .
One can be easily shown that theminimum area related to mind is the areaof an equilateral triangle of side length
mind ,i.e.,
( ) ( ) 22432
43
planckminmin lk~
dA ==On the other hand, the maximum arearelated to mind is the area of an sphere
of radius mind ,i.e.,222planckminmax lk
~dA ππ ==
Thus, the elementary area( )99222
0 planckAminA lk~
dA δδ ==must have a value between minA and
maxA , i.e.,
13πδ << A4
3
The previous assumption that( ) 22
0 960 plancklA π= shows that22 960 πδ =k
~A what means that
91465 .k~
. <<Therefore we conclude that
( )10010 34 .mlk~
d planckmin−≈=
The esimaln − area after 0A is
( ) ( )101022 AnndA minA ==δ
One can also be easily shownthat the minimum volume related to
mind is the volume of an regular
tetrahedron of edge length mind , i.e.,
( ) ( ) 3312
2312
2planckminmin lk
~d ==Ω
The maximum volume is the volume ofa sphere of radius mind , i.e.,
( ) ( ) 333
433
4planckminmax lk
~d ππΩ ==
Thus, the elementary volume333
0 planckVminV lk~
d δδΩ == must have a
value between minΩ and maxΩ , i.e.,
( )3
412
2 πδ << V
On the other hand, the esimaln −volume after 0Ω is
( ) .n,...,,,nnnd maxminV 321033 === ΩδΩ
The existence of maxn given by (26),i.e.,
( ) 6430 101043 ≈×=
===
planck
minmaxminmaxmax
lk~
.
ddLLn
shows that the Universe must have afinite volume whose value at thepresent stage is
( ) 3330
3pVminVminpUpUp ddddn δδΩΩ ===
where pd is the present length scale of
the Universe. In addition as( )
34
122 πδ << V we conclude that the
Universe must have a polyhedralspace topology with volume betweenthe volume of a regular tetrahedron ofedge length pd and the volume of the
sphere of diameter pd .
A recent analysis ofastronomical data suggests not onlythat the Universe is finite, but also thatit has a dodecahedral space topology[13,14], what is in strong accordancewith the theoretical predictions above. Now multiplying (98) by 2n theexpression of 0F we obtain
( )102480480 44
02
02
r
hcA
r
hcAnFnF
−=
−== ππ
which is the general expression of theCasimir force. Thus we conclude that theCasimir effect is just a gravitationaleffect related to the uncertaintyprinciple. Note that the Eq.(102) arisesonly when im∆ and im′∆ satisfy
Eq.(94). If only im∆ satisfies Eq.(94),
i.e., rcmi ∆∆ << but rcmi ∆∆ >>′ then
gm∆ and gm′∆ will be respectively
given by
ig
g
mm
and
rcm
∆∆
∆∆
≅′
−≅ 2
Consequently, the expression (96)becomes
( ) ( )
( )( )103
43
4
2
323
′
=
=
′=
′
=
c
EG
r
hc
c
cmG
r
hc
c
mG
r
hcF ii
π∆
∆
π∆
∆π∆
∆∆
However, from the uncertainty principle forenergy and time we know that
( )104t~E ∆∆ Therefore we can write the expression(103) in the following form:
( )
( ) ( )1051
1
23
33
′=
=
′
=
ctl
r
hc
ctc
G
r
hcF
planck ∆π∆
∆π∆∆
From the General Relativity Theory weknow that 00gcdtdr −= . If the field is
14weak then 2
00 21 cg φ−−= and
( ) ( )222 11 crGmcdtccdtdr −=+= φ .
For 122 <<crGm we obtain cdtdr ≅ .Thus, if rddr ′= then tddt ′= . Thismeans that we may change ( )ct′∆ by( )r∆ into (105). The result is
( )
( )
( )40
224
24
960
480
480
1
021
r
hcA
lr
hc
lr
hcF
A
planck
planck
∆π
π∆π
π∆∆
=
=
=
=
=
or
40
0 960 r
hcAF
=
π
whence
( )106960 4r
hcAF
=
π
Now the Casimir force is repulsive, andits intensity is the half of the intensitypreviously obtained (102). Consider the case when both
im∆ and im′∆ do not satisfy Eq.(94),and
rcm
rcm
i
i
∆∆∆∆
>>′>>
In this case, ig mm ∆∆ ≅ and ig mm ′≅′ ∆∆ .
Thus,
( )( )( )
( )( )( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( )402
24
24
22232
2
4
2
22
2
1920
960
1920
2
1
1
r
hcAl
r
hc
lr
hc
tcr
hc
c
G
r
t
c
G
r
cEcEG
r
mmGF
planck
planck
ii
∆π
π∆π
∆π
∆∆∆∆
∆∆∆
∆∆∆∆
−=
−=
=
−=
=
−=
−=
=′
−=′
−=
whence
( )1071920 4r
hcAF
−=
π
The force will be attractive and itsintensity will be the fourth part of theintensity given by the first expression(102) for the Casimir force. There is a crucial cosmologicalproblem to be solved: the problem ofthe hidden mass. Most theories predictthat the amount of known matter,detectable and available in theuniverse, is only about 1/10 to 1/100 ofthe amount needed to close theuniverse. That is, to achieve thedensity sufficient to close-up theuniverse by maintaining thegravitational curvature (escape velocityequal to the speed of light) at the outerboundary. The Eq.(45) may solve thisproblem. We will start by substitutingthe well-known expression of Hubble'slaw for velocity, lH
~V = , into Eq.(45).
( 1181071 −−×= s.H~
is the Hubbleconstant). The expression obtainedshows that particles which are atdistances ( )( ) m.H
~cll 26
0 103135 ×===have quasi null gravitational mass
( )mingg mm 0= ; beyond this distance, the
particles have negative gravitationalmass. Therefore, there are two well-defined regions in the Universe; theregion of the bodies with positivegravitational masses and the region of thebodies with negative gravitational mass.The total gravitational mass of the firstregion, in accordance with Eq.(45), will begiven by
1221
111
1i
iig m
cV
mMM ≅
−=≅
where 1im is the total inertial mass ofthe bodies of the mentioned region;
cV <<1 is the average velocity of thebodies at region 1. The totalgravitational mass of the second regionis
15
2222
22 11
12 iig M
cVMM
−
−−=
where 2V is the average velocity of
the bodies ; 22222 1 cVmM ii −= and
2im is the total inertial mass of thebodies of region 2. Now consider that from Eq.(7),we can write
2
2
cV
cM
V
Eg
gg ρξ ===
where ξ is the energy density of matter.
Note that the expression of ξonly reduces to the well-knownexpression 2cρ , where ρ is the sum ofthe inertial masses per volume unit,when ig mm = . Therefore, in thederivation of the well-known difference
( )1083
8 2H~G U −
ρπ
which gives the sign of the curvatureof the Universe [15], we must use
2cgUρξ = instead of 2cUρξ = .The
result obviously is
( )1093
82H
~G gU −ρπ
where
( )11021
U
gg
U
gU
gUV
MM
V
M +==ρ
gUM and UV are respectively the total
gravitational mass and the volume ofthe Universe.Substitution of 1gM and 2gM into
expression (110) gives
U
iiiU
gU V
mmcVcV
m
−
−−
−+
=
22222
222
1
2
1
3
ρ
where 21 iiiU mmm += is the totalinertial mass of the Universe. The volume 1V of the region 1and the volume 2V of the region 2, arerespectively given by
132
230
21 22 VlVandlV c −== ππ
where m.H~
cl c261081 ×== is the
so-called "radius" of the visibleUniverse. Moreover, 111 Vmii =ρ and
222 Vmii =ρ . Due to the hypothesis ofthe uniform distribution of matter in thespace, follows that 21 ii ρρ = .Thus, wecan write
3803
0
2
1
2
1 .l
l
V
V
m
m
ci
i =
==
Similarly,
1
1
2
2
V
m
V
m
V
m ii
U
iU ==
Therefore,
iUiUc
iUU
i m.ml
lm
V
Vm 6201
3
022 =
−==
and iUi m.m 3801 = .
Substitution of 2im into the expression
of gUρ yields
U
iUiU
gUV
m.cV
.
cV
.m
−
−−
−+
=
6201
241
1
86122
222
2ρ
Due to cV ≅2 , we conclude that theterm between bracket (hidden mass) isvery greater than iUm10 . The amount
iUm is the mass of known matter in theuniverse (1/10 to 1/100 of the amountneeded to close the Universe). Consequently, the total mass
−
−−
−+ iUiU m.
cV
.
cV
.m 620
1
241
1
86122
222
2
must be sufficient to close theUniverse. This solves therefore theproblem of the hidden mass. There is another cosmologicalproblem to be solved: the problem ofthe anomalies in the spectral red-shiftof certain galaxies and stars. Several observers have noticedred-shift values that cannot beexplained by the Doppler-Fizeau
16effect or by the Einstein effect (thegravitational spectrum shift, suppliedby Einstein's theory). This is the case of the so-calledStefan's quintet (a set of five galaxieswhich were discovered in 1877),whose galaxies are located atapproximately the same distance fromthe Earth, according to very reliableand precise measuring methods. But,when the velocities of the galaxies aremeasured by its red-shifts , the velocity ofone of them is much greater than thevelocity of the others. Similar observations have beenmade on the Virgo constellation andspiral galaxies. Also the Sun presentsa red-shift greater than the predictedvalue by the Einstein effect. It seems that some of theseanomalies can be explained if weconsider the Eq.(45) in the calculationof the gravitational mass of the pointof emission. The expression of thegravitational spectrum shift, suppliedby Einstein's theory [16] is given by
( )11112
1122
1212
21
ω
ωφφ
ωωω∆
c
rGmrGmc
gg +−=
=−
=−=
where 1ω is the frequency of the lightat the point of emission ; 2ω is thefrequency at the point of observation;
1φ and 2φ are respectively, theNewtonian gravitational potentials atthe point of emission and at the pointof observation. This expression has beendeduced from 000 gtt −= [17] which
correlates own time (real time), t , withthe temporal coordinate x0 of thespace-time ( cxt 0
0 = ). When the gravitational field isweak , the temporal component 00g
of the metric tensor is given by 221 c/goo φ−−= [18]. Thus we readily obtain
( )11221 20 rcGmtt g−=
Curiously, this equation tell usthat we can have 0tt < when 0>gm ;
and 0tt > for 0<gm . In addition, if
Grcmg 22= , i.e., if 22 cGmr g=( Schwarzschild radius ) we obtain 0=t . These theoretical results lead toa new conception of time with amazingpractical consequences. Let us now consider the well-known process of stars' gravitationalcontraction. It is known that thedestination of the star is directlycorrelated to its mass. If the star'smass is less than 1.4M ( Schemberg-Chandrasekhar's limit), it becomes awhite dwarf. If its mass exceeds thatlimit, the pressure produced by thedegenerate state of the matter nolonger counterbalances thegravitational pressure, and the star'scontraction continues. Afterwardsoccur the reactions between protonsand electrons ( capture of electrons ),where neutrons and anti-neutrinos areproduced. The contraction continues untilthe system regains stability ( when thepressure produced by the neutrons issufficient to stop the gravitationalcollapse). Such systems are calledneutron stars. There is also a critical mass forthe stable configuration of neutronstars. This limit has not been fullydefined as yet, but it is known that it islocated between 1.8M and 2.4M . Thus,if the mass of the star exceeds 2.4M ,the contraction will continue. According to Hawking[19]collapsed objects cannot have massless than kg.Gc 810114 −×=
. This
means that the neutrons clusterbecomes a cluster of superparticleswhere the minimal inertial mass of thesuperparticle is
17
( ) ( )1131011 8 .kg.m spi−×=
Symmetry is a fundamental attributeof the Universe that enables aninvestigator to study particular aspectsof physical systems by themselves. Forexample, the assumption that space ishomogeneous and isotropic is basedon Symmetry Principle. Also here, bysymmetry, we can assume that thereare only superparticles with mass
( ) kg.m spi81011 −×= in the cluster of
superparticles. Let us now imagine the Universecoming back for the past. There will bean instant in which it will be similar to aneutrons cluster, such as the stars atthe final state of gravitationalcontraction. Thus, with the progressingof the compression, the neutronscluster becomes a cluster ofsuperparticles. Obviously, this only canoccur before 10-23s(after the Big-Bang). The temperature T of theUniverse at the 10-43s< t < 10-23speriod can be calculated by means ofthe well-known expression[20]:
( ) ( )1141010 21
2322 −−≈ tT
Thus at st 4310−≅ ( at the firstspontaneous breaking of symmetry )the temperature was KT 3210≈(∼ 1019GeV).Therefore, we can assumethat the absorbed electromagneticenergy by each superparticle, before
st 4310−≅ , was JkTU 9101×>=η ( seeEqs.(71) and (72) ). By comparing with
( ) Jcm spi82 109×≅ , we conclude that
( ) cmU spi> . Therefore, the unification
condition ( )22 cmcMUn iir >≅ is
satisfied. This means that, beforest 4310−≅ , the gravitational and
electromagnetic interactions wereunified.
From the unification condition( )2cMUn ir ≅ , we may conclude that the
superparticles' relativistic inertialmass ( )spiM is
( ) ( )11510 8
22kg
c
kTn
c
UnM rr
spi−≈=≅
η
Comparing with the superparticles'inertial mass at rest (113), weconclude that
( ) ( ) ( )1161011 8kg.mM spispi−×=≈
From Eqs.(83) and (115), we obtainthe superparticle's gravitational massat rest, i.e.,
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )117
2
2c
kTnM
Mmm
rspi
spispispg
η−≅−≅
≅−=
and consequently, the superparticle'srelativistic gravitational mass, is
( ) ( )1181 222 cVc
kTnM r
spg−
−= η
Thus, the gravitational forces betweentwo superparticles , according to (13),is given by:
( ) ( )
( )
( )( ) ( )119212
2
5
2
2122112
µκη
µ
ˆr
cTn
c
G
m
M
ˆr
MMGFF
r
spi
spi
'spgspg
!!
=
=−=−=
Due to the unification of thegravitational and electromagneticinteractions at that period, we have
( ) ( )
( )
( )( )
( )1204 2
0
2
212
2
5
2
2122112
r
e
ˆr
cT
c
G
m
M
ˆr
MMGFF
spi
spi
'spgspg
πε
µηκ
µ
=
=
=
==−=
""
##
From the equation above we can write
18
( )
( )( ) ( )121
4 0
22
5
2
πεηκ e
cTc
G
m
M
spi
spi =
$$
Now assuming that
( )
( )( ) ( )1222
5
2
ψηκ =
T
c
G
m
M
spi
spi %
the Eq.(121) can be rewritten in thefollowing form:
( )123137
1
4 0
2
==c
e %πε
ψ
which is the well-known reciprocal finestructure constant . For KT 3210= the Eq.(122) gives
( )
( )( ) ( )124
100
12
5
2
≈
= Tn
c
G
m
Mr
spi
spi κηψ &This value has the same order ofmagnitude that the exact value(1/137)of the reciprocal fine structureconstant. From equation (120) we canwrite:
( ) ( ) ( )125&'' =
r
rc
MMG
'spgspg
ψ
The term between parenthesis has thesame dimensions that the linearmomentum p( . Thus Eq.(125) tells usthat
( )126.rp )**=⋅
A component of the momentum of aparticle cannot be precisely specifiedwithout loss of all knowledge of thecorresponding component of itsposition at that time ,i.e., a particlecannot precisely localized in aparticular direction without loss of allknowledge of its momentumcomponent in that direction . Thismeans that in intermediate cases theproduct of the uncertainties of thesimultaneously measurable values ofcorresponding position and momentumcomponents is at least of the order ofmagnitude of + ,i.e.,
( )127)≥r.p∆∆
This relation, directly obtained herefrom the Unified Theory, is the well-known relation of the UncertaintyPrinciple for position and momentum. According to Eq.(83), thegravitational mass of the superparticlesat the center of the cluster becomesnegative when ( )spir mckTn >22η ,
i.e., when
( ).K
kn
mTT
r
spi
critical3210
2≈=>
ηAccording to Eq.(114) this temperaturecorresponds to stc
4310−≈ .
With the progressing of thecompression, more superparticles intothe center will have negativegravitational mass. Consequently,there will have a critical point in whichthe repulsive gravitational forcesbetween the superparticles withnegative gravitational masses and thesuperparticles with positivegravitational masses will be so strongthat an explosion will occur. This is theexperiment that we call the Big Bang.
Now, starting from the Big Bang tothe present time. Immediately after the BigBang, the superparticles' decompressingbegins. The gravitational mass of the mostcentral superparticle will only be positivewhen the temperature becomes smallerthan the critical temperature,
KTcritical3210≈ . At the maximum state
of compression ( exactly at the BigBang ) the volumes of thesuperparticles was equal to theelementary volume minV dδΩ =0 and thevolume of the Universe was
( ) 33initialVminV dnd δδΩ == where initiald was
the initial length scale of the Universe. Atthis very moment the average density ofthe Universe was equal to the averagedensity of the superparticles, thus we canwrite
( )
( )( )128
3
spi
Ui
min
initial
m
M
d
d=
where ( ) kgM Ui5310≈ is the inertial
19mass of the Universe. It has already beenshown that .mlk
~d planckmin
3410−≈= Then,
from the Eq.(128), we obtain:
( )12910 14mdinitial−≈
After the Big Bang the Universe expandsitself from initiald up to crd ( when
the temperature decreasing reaches thecritical temperature KTcritical
3210≈ , andthe gravity becomes attractive). Thus, itexpands by initialcr dd − , under effect ofthe repulsive gravity
( )( ) ( )[ ] ( )( ) ( )[ ]( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
initialcr
Ui
initialcr
Uispi
initialcr
Uispg
initialcr
UiUg
crUiinitialUg
minmax
dd
GM
dd
MmG
dd
MmG
dd
MMG
dMGdMG
ggg
χχ 22
22
2
21
212
21
21
==
===
==
==
∑
∑
during to a time stc4310−≈ .Thus,
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )13022
21
cinitialcr
Ui
cinitialcr tdd
GMtgdd χ==−
The Eq.(83), gives
( )
( ) ( ) ( )T
cm
kTn
cm
Un
m
m
spi
r
spi
r
spi
spg 32
2210
21
21 −≈−=−==
ηχ
The temperature at the beginning ofthe Big Bang (t=0) should have beenvery greater than KTcritical
3210≈ .Thus, χ must be a very big number.Then it is easily seen that during thisperiod, the Universe expanded at anastonishing rate. Thus, there is anevident inflation period, which ends at
st c4310−≈ .
With the progressing of thedecompression, the superparticlescluster becomes a neutrons cluster.This means that the neutrons arecreated without its antiparticle, theantineutron. Thus it solves thematter/antimatter dilemma that isunresolved in many cosmologies. Now a question: How did theprimordial superparticles appear at thebeginning of the Universe?
It is a proven quantum factthat a wave function Ψ may collapseand that at this moment all thepossibilities that it describes aresuddenly expressed in reality. Thismeans that, through this process,particles can be suddenly materialized. The materialization of theprimordial superparticles into a criticalvolume denotes knowledge of whatwould happen starting from that initialcondition, fact that points towards theexistence of a Creator.
CONCLUSION We have described acoherent way for the quantization ofgravity, which provides a consistentunification of gravity withelectromagnetism. As we have seen,this new approach will allow us tounderstand some crucial matters inQuantum Cosmology. The equation of correlationbetween gravitational and inertialmasses, which has been deriveddirectly from the theory of gravity, hasrelevant technological consequences.We have seen that gravitational masscan be negative at specific conditions.This means that it will be possible tobuild gravitational binaries(gravitational motors), and to extractenergy from any site of a gravitationalfield. Obviously, the Gravity Control willbe also very important toTransportation Systems. On the otherhand, negative gravitational masssuggests the possibility of dipolegravitational radiation. This fact ishighly relevant because now we maybuild transceivers to operate withgravitational waves. Furthermore, thereceiver would allow us to directlyobserve for the first time the CosmicMicrowave Background in GravitationalRadiation, which would picture theUniverse at the beginning of the Big-Bang.
20APPENDIX A It is known that the orbitalangular momentum L
, and the intrinsic
spin angular momentum S,
interactmagnetically between themselves toproduce a total angular momentum J
,.
We then have( ) ( )11 AllL += -
( )2AmL lz -=
( ) ( )31 AssS += -( )4AmS sz -=
( ) ( )51 AjjJ += -( )6AmJ jz
.=
where l is the orbital quantum number,s is the spin quantum number,
slj ±= is the total quantumnumber; lm is the orbital magnetic
quantum number; sm is the spinmagnetic quantum number and
slj mmm ±= is the total magnetic
number. Also atomic nuclei have intrinsicangular momenta that contribute tothe total angular momenta of theatoms. However, this contribution isnegligible [21]. The magnetic moment jM
,associated with J
, is [22]:( ) ( )72 AJmeM j
,,γ=
where γ is called the gyromagneticratio. The values of γ for electrons,neutrons and protons are respectively:- 2.0024; -3.8256 and 5.5851. Fornuclear protons,
( ) ( ) .J,J,mm
m,slj,ms,ml
pzpsl
jsl
-- 2123
1
21
21
21
===−
==−=====
Thus, Eq.(A7) gives( ) ( )8104422 226 Am.A.JmeM pppJp
−×==γ( ) ( )9104112 226 Am.A.JmeM pzppJpz
−×==γ
Then the total magnetic field JpH,
of
the proton is [23]:
( )102 3 ArMH JpJp π,,
=where r is the spin radius of theproton. The total magnetic fieldinduction is JpJp HB
,,0µ= , therefore
( )1110874 3330 Ar.HB JpJp
−×== µ We can write the angularmomentum pJ
, in the following form
ppp KJ ω= where pω is the angular
velocity of the proton and pK its
angular kinetic energy, given by
( )1211
1222
2
AcVr
cIK
p
pp
−
−=
where rV pp ω= and
( ) ( )131 2222
22
Armrmrr
rmrmI
ppp
pppp
χβ
β
=+=
=+=
is the moment of inertia with respect tothe rotation axis; β is a numericalfactor, which depends on the structuralform adopted for the proton. In thecase of a solid sphere, 5
2=β . For cV << , Eq.(A12) reduces to
( )( ) ( ) 22
1222
12222 2 ωIrVIcVrIcK ===Comparison of ( )-23=pJ and
ppp KJ ω= shows that
( ) ( )1411
1
23 22
2
AcV
cm
p
pp
p
−
−= -
χω
From the intrinsic precessionmotion of the proton we observe that
Fig. 1
x
z
yα
αα r
F
Vp
R
.
BJpz BJp
BJpx
21(Fig.1) the component of the Lorentz'sforce, JpzpJpzp BeVsinBeVF == φ , about the x
axis, αcosF ,is equal to the centripetalforce ppppppcp VmrIrVmF ωχω === 22 .Thus,
( ) ( )15AVmcosBeV ppppJpzp ωχα =However αcosBB JpJpz = . Therefore
the equation above becomes
( )162
Acose
mB
ppp
Jp αωχ
=
Comparison of (A16) and (A11) showsthat
( )17106642
225 A
r
cos.V
pp χ
α−×=
Due to cVp < , it follows from Eq.(A17)
that
( )18028010836 13
Arcos.cos
c
.r p
pp χα
χα =
×>−
where m.r p151041 −×= and
5770.JJcos ppz ==αOn the other hand, from the nucleardimensions we know that
m.rr p151041 −×=< . Thus we can write
( )190280
Arrrcos.
pp
p
<<χ
α
An approximated value for r can beobtained by means of the followingrelation
( )200280
Arcos.
YY
rr p
p
p
==
χα
whence4877 p.Y χ=
Therefore we can write
( )2110781 416 A.Y
rr p
p χ−×==
or
( )2210014
63
Ar
.p
−×=χ
From (A13) we have 22 10 pp r.r ≅χsince prr < . Thus from (A22) we
obtain
( )23107 17 Amr −×≅and
( )2441 Ap ≅χComparison of rVpp =ω and (A14) shows
that
( )251074
11
1
9
22
A.
cV
V
p
p ×=
−
−
whence
( )261083 7 As/m.Vp ×= Now consider a sample of amonatomic substance ( atomicnumber Z ) inside an externalmagnetic field of induction B
/. Under
these circumstances the nuclearprotons carry out a precession motionwith respect to the direction of B
/,
making an angle θ with B/
(Fig.2).The binary pτ which tends to align the
axis of pL/
with the axis of B/
is
( )27ABsinM Jpzp θτ =
where 22610411 m.A.M Jpz−×= .
Therefore the magnetic field
JpB/
of each nuclear proton is
aligned at the same direction of pL/
,
and consequently the magnetic field ofthe nucleus, NB
/, due to the protons at
the direction of pL/
, will be given by
Fig.2
Lp θ
B
22( )28ABZB JpN
00=
Only the component, θsinBN , alters
the radius r (Fig.3). The force rF ,
produced by θsinBN
0 and pV
0,
increases the centripetal forcerVmF pp
2= decreasing r and
increasing pV0
. This means that the
proton acquires a new velocitycrV pp ≈′′=′ ω which corresponds to a
magnetic field JpB′0
through the proton
that is equal to( )29AsinZBsinBB JpNJp θθ ==′
This phenomenon is similar to astrong compression upon the proton,which decrease r increasing pV .
Equation (45) tells us that, if c.Vp 7450>the gravitational mass of the protonbecomes negative. This explains thenegative gravitational masses of thesuperparticles, under strong thermalcompression, in the neutron clusterspreviously mentioned. From Eqs.(A16) and (A14) we have
( ) ( )3011
1
23 222
222
2
AcVcose
cm
cose
mB
p
pp
ppp
Jp
−
−=
==
αχ
αωχ
1
( ) ( )3111
1
23 222
222
2
AcVcose
cm
cose
mB
p
pp
ppp
Jp
−
′−′=
=′′
=′
α
χ
αωχ
2whence
( )32
11
1
11
1
22
2
22
2
A
cVcos
cVcos
B
B
p
p
Jp
Jp
−
−′
−
′−=
′
α
α
Comparison of (A32) and (A29) gives
( )
( ) ( )3311
1
11
1
2
2
22
22
Acos
cosZsin
cV
cV
p
p
ααθ ′
−
−=
=
−
′−
Substitution of (A33) into (45) shows thatthe gravitational mass of the nuclearprotons can be written as follows
( )3411
12
2
2
22Am
cos
cosZsin
cVmm p
p
pgp ααθ ′
−
−−=
From (A14) we can write
( )35
11
1
11
1
22
22
A
cV
cV
V
V
V
V
r
r
p
p
p
p
pp
pp
−
′−
−
−
′=
′′=
′ωω
Comparison of (A35) and (A32) shows that
( )362
2
AV
V
r
r
cos
cos
B
B
p
p
Jp
Jp
′
′=
′′
αα
Substitution of (A29) into (A36) gives
( )372
2
Acos
cos
V
VZsin
r
r
p
p
ααθ
′
′
=′
It can be easily shown that( ) αα tanrrtan ′=′ . Thus (A37)
becomes
( )382
2 AV
V
Zsin
sinsin
p
p
′=′
θαα
where 9402 .sin =α .
Fig.3
θ
α
αrp
proton
B
BNcosθ
BNsinθ
z
Vp
Fr
r
BN
BJp
R
23 For pp VV =′ , 1=θsin and maxZZ = ,
we obtain from (A38),( ) ( )391012 2 AZsin maxmin
−≅≅′αwhence we obtain ( ) 310−≅′
minsinα .
Thus ( ) ( ) 11 2 ≅′−=′minmax sincos αα .
On the other hand, ( ) 12 =′maxsin α .
Therefore, ( ) 707045 .ºsinsin max ==′α
and ( ) ( ) 701 2 .sincos maxmin ≅′−=′ αα .
Thus170 <′< αcos.
Substitution of s/m.Vp71083 ×= ,
33302 .cos =α and 802 .cos ≅′α intoEq.(A34) yields
( ) ( )4010931 2 AmZsin.m pgp θ−×−= The density of electromagneticenergy in an electromagnetic field is
2212
21 HEW µε += . It is known that
HvvBE µ== where, according to
(54), µσω2=v for ωεσ >> . Thus
( )4112 2
212
21 AHHW µµ
σωε ≅
+=
For ωεσ << , Eq.(54) shows that
rrcv µε= and therefore we obtain2HW µ= .
In the case of nuclear protonsinside H
3, the work to bring the dipole
from 0=ϕ (null energy) to ϕ is
( )420
AdU p∫=ϕ
ϕτ
where ϕτ BsinM Jpzp = in agreement
with (A27); HB 0µ= . Thus we can write
( )432
2
0
0
ABsinMdsinBM
dU
JpzJpz
p
∫∫
−
−
==
==θ
θ
π
π
θϕϕ
ϕτ
This energy is equal to the energy"extracted" from the field to align eachnuclear proton at the samedirection ( )θ , which is given by
( ) ( )442202
1 AZVHU *µ=where *V is the volume of the sphere
of radius *r , around the nucleus,defined as follows:The density of energy W is the same
in each point inside H . This meansthat the density of energy in eachorbital electron,
ceorbitalspaJeze VBsinMW θ=is equal to the density in each proton,
*Jpzp VBsinMW θ=
where ( )33
4*atomceorbitalspa rrV −= π ; atomr
is the radius of the atom, and 33
4** rV π= .
Thus
( ) 33*
Jpz
*atom
Jez
r
M
rr
M =−
whence,
( )4510301 3
Ar.MM
rr atom
JpzJez
atom* =
+=
since ( ) 224102792 m.A.JmeM ezeeJez−×==γ
and 22610411 m.A.M Jpz−×= .
Note that *r is smaller than theradius of the first electronic orbit of theatom ( )m~ 11105 −× .Comparison of (A43) and (A44) showsthat
( )4610466
104664
328
328
0
AdScos
d
Z
r.
BZ
r.B
MZ
Vsin
Batom
atom
Jpz
*
×=
=×=
=
ςΦ
µθ
sincedScosBSd.Bd B ςΦ ==
33 Note that the expression of
θsin as function of B yields onlypositive values of θsin . Thus, itis necessary the substitution of Bby dScosd B ςΦ to show explicitly thenegative values of θsin . Thus, if
2πς > the Eq.(A46) yields 0<θsin .In this case, the sign ( )− in Eq.(A40)becomes ( )+ . In practice when a magnetapproaches from a metallic sample, amagnetic field is induced at the sample( in opposition to the magnetic field of
24the magnet ). Under these conditions,the angle ς between the induced
magnetic flux density B4
and Sd4
iszero, and therefore the magnetic flux
Sd.BB
44=Φ will be positive and, in
accordance with (A40), there will be adecrease in the gravitational mass ofthe sample. However, when themagnet is moved backward thedirection of the induced magnetic fluxdensity is inverted ( the angle ςbecomes equal to 1800 ) making
Sd.BB
44=Φ negative. In this case there
will be an increase in the gravitationalmass of the sample. It was implicitlyassumed in both cases that theoscillating period ( T ) of the magnet isrelatively long. If T is short the concept ofEffective or Root-Mean-Square Valuemay be extended to the periodicmagnetic flux ( )tBB ΦΦ = . The result is
( ) ( )471
0
2 AdtT
T
BrmsB ∫= ΦΦ
Thus, the effective value of BΦ is
( )rmsBΦ (always positive). This means
that, ςcos will be always positive.Consequently, θsin will be alwayspositive too, and the sign ( )− inEq.(A40) does not change, i.e., it willbe always negative. For θsin always positive wemay take the expression of θsin asfunction of B in (A46). In addition, ifthe oscillating period of the magneticflux ( )tBB ΦΦ = is short we maychange B for rmsB , and consequentlythe substitution of (A46) into (A40)yields
[ ] ( )48105221 327 AmBr.m prmsatomgp ×−=
For a sinusoidal waveform, theeffective value of the magnetic fluxdensity, as we know, is
2m
rms
BB =
According to (A46) the value ofθsin will be null when 0=BdΦ .
Consider then the Maxwell's equation
( )49At
BE
∂∂−=×∇
44
whence we obtain
( )( )50A
dt
d
SdBdt
dSd
t
BSdE
B
SSS
Φ−=
=⋅−=∂∂−=×∇ ∫∫∫
44444
If B does not depends on time(constant with respect to the time) then
0=∂∂ tB and (A49) shows that
0=×∇ E4
. Thus (A50) gives0=BdΦ
In this case, Eq.(A46) gives 0=θsinand consequently Eq.(A40) reduces to
pgp mm = .
Now consider Eq.(A48). Notethat besides rmsB it depends on 3
atomr .
The values of atomr for light elements
such as Mg, Al, Si, are m. 1010751 −×m. 1010431 −× , m. 1010171 −× respectively.
For heavy elements such as Pt, Au,Pb, the values are m. 1010381 −× ,
m. 1010441 −× , m. 1010751 −× respectively.Thus, for Mg or Pb the Eq.(A48) gives
[ ] ( )51103511 2 AmB.m prmsgp−×−=
which shows that to yield a variation >1% in the gravitational mass of theprotons of Mg or Pb , it is necessary
T.Brms 740> Recently, superconductingmagnets are able to produce T.714 ,therefore the validity of this part of thetheory can be checked.
25
APPENDIX B Equation (59) shows that thegravitational mass of a specialdielectric called Duracap 86103 isstrongly decreased when it issubjected to electromagnetic fields withintensities > 200 V/m and frequenciesof the order of magnitude of Hz6101 −× . In order to check this theoreticalprediction we propose to submit a diskof Duracap 86103 ∗ ( 5 mm thickness)to the electric field of a parallel-platecapacitor as showed in Fig.4. Thedensity of the Duracap is 31400 −= m.kgρand its electrical properties are: 3=rε ;
1=rµ ; mm/KV.strengthdieletric 498= ;m/S.393=σ (electrical conductivity).
The capacitor is placed betweentwo disks of plexiglas and connectedto an oscillator HP3325A (Op.002-High Voltage Output) which cangenerate sinusoidal voltages withextremely-low frequencies down to
Hz6101 −× with amplitude up to 20V. Avoltmeter at parallel with the capacitorwill measure the appliedinstantaneous voltage ftsinVV map π2= .
When a sinusoidal voltageftsinVV map π2= , is applied at the
terminals of the capacitor, the electricfield E inside the dielectric is
( )1Bl
VE
r
ap
ε=
Where l is the thickness of thedielectric. Therefore, the gravitational massof the dielectric, ( )diegm , in agreement
with (59), is given by
( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( )211075121 3420 BmfV.m dieiapdieg −×+−= −
where ( )dieim is the initial inertial mass
of the dielectric (Duracap), ( ) g.m diei 9754= .
∗ Duracap 86103 is produced by Polyone Inc.,www.polyone.com
Only for 0=apV the gravitational mass
of the dielectric is equal to its initialinertial mass. Applying on the capacitors asinusoidal voltage wave of 40Vpp
(amplitude VVm 20= ) with frequency
Hzf 6101 −×= then, at h.s.t 2227957 ≅≅the applied instantaneous voltage willbe VVap 1= and the balance, in
agreement with Eq.(B2) must show amass decrease of ~1.6% with respectto initial mass of the dielectric ( )dieim .
At h.s.t 66223873 ≅≅ the voltage willbe VVap 3= and the decrease of mass
must be approximately equal toinitial mass of the dielectric. At
h.s.t 28829602 ≅≅ the voltage will beV.Vap 73= and the mass decrease
must be approximately equal to twicethe value of the initial mass of thedielectric. Finally at days.s,t 92000250 ≅=the voltage will be VVap 20=( amplitude ) and the mass decrease:
( ) Kg.m. diei 431084189 −≅− .
As showed in Fig.4, a electronicbalance can used to obtain the
a Duracap 86103 ( 100mm diameter, 5 mm thickness)b Aluminium ( 100 mm diameter, 1 mm thickness) (Surface finish: poli shed Duracap side)c Plexiglas ( 102 mm diameter, 3 mm thickness)
Fig.4
Counterbalance15 kg
HP3325A
Faraday Cage
Voltmeter
ab c
bc
Balance
26experimental data. However they mustbe confirmed in a mechanicaldynamometer. The presented experimentshows then how is possible to controlthe weight of the dielectric of thecapacitors. This possibility points tosome interesting systems as shown inFig. 5. Figures 5(a) and 5(b) show thegeneration of Lift Force . Figure 5(c)shows a new concept of motor : theGravitational Motor, also based on thegravity control. When the gravitational field of anobject changes, the changes rippleoutwards through spacetime. Theseripples are called gravitational radiationor gravitational waves. The existence of gravitationalwaves follows from the General Theoryof Relativity. In Einstein's theory ofgravity the gravitational wavespropagate at the speed of light. Just as electromagnetic waves(EM), gravitational waves (GW) toocarry energy and momentum from theirsources. Unlike EM waves, however,there is no dipole radiation in Einstein'stheory of gravity. The dominantchannel of emission is quadrupolar.But the existence of negativegravitational mass suggest thepossibility of dipole gravitationalradiation. This fact is highly relevantbecause now we can build agravitational wave transmitter togenerate detectable levels ofgravitational radiation. Gravitationalwaves are very suitable as a means oftransmitting information because oftheir low interaction an therefore lowscattering. In figure 5(d) we present theGravitational Radiation Transmitter, anew concept of transmitter that arisesfrom this new technology.
27
(a) (c)
(b) (d)
Fig. 5 - Schematic diagram of systems using gravity control:(a) and (b) The generation of Gravitational Lift Force. (c) The Gravitational Motor(d) The Gravitational Radiation Transmitter.
123
45
n
F = n F0 - (n+1)P0 ; P0 is the weight of each plate of the capacitor
F0 = mg g
Special dielectric ( mg )
ELF oscillator
The weight ofthis side of the
rotors isinverted due tothe ELF electric
field of thecapacitor
ELF oscillator
SemicircularPlate of theCapacitor
Special dielectric
LIFT
LIFT
Gravitationalwaves (GW)willbe radiated fromthe encapsulationas consequence
of the variation ofits gravitational
mass (due to ELFelectromagnetic
field).
ELF antennaencapsulated byspecial dielectric
GW GW
ELF oscillator
Metal
28
REFERENCES[1] Isham, C. J. (1975) Quantum gravity, an Oxford Symposium, OUP.[2] Isham, C.J., (1997) "Structural Problems Facing Quantum Gravity Theory'', in M, Francaviglia, G, Longhi, L, Lusanna, and E, Sorace, eds., Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation, 167-209, (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997).[3] Landau, L. and Lifchitz, E. (1969) Theorie du Champ, Ed.MIR, Moscow, Portuguese version (1974) Ed. Hemus, S.Paulo, p.35.[4] Landau, L. and Lifchitz, E. (1969) Mecanique, Ed.MIR, Moscow, 15.[5] Landau, L. and Lifchitz, E.[3], p.35.[6] Landau, L. and Lifchitz, E.[3], p.36.[7] Beiser, A. (1967) Concepts of Modern Physics, McGraw-Hil l, Portuguese version (1969) Ed. Poligno, S.Paulo, p.151.[8] Schiff , L.I. (1981) Quantum Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, p.54.[9] Landau, L. and Lifchitz, E.[3], p.324.[10] Landau, L. and Lifchitz, E.[3], p.357.[11] Landau, L.and Lifchitz,E.[3],p.p.358-359.[12] Landau, L. and Lifchitz, E.[3], p.64.[13] Luminet, J. at al., (2003) Nature 425, 593–595.[14] Ellis, G.F.R (2003) Nature 425, 566–567.[15] Landau, L. and Lifchitz, E.[3], p.440-441.[16] Landau, L. and Lifchitz, E.[3], p.333.[17] Landau, L. and Lifchitz, E.[3], p.331.[18] Landau, L. and Lifchitz, E.[3], p.327.[19] Hawking, S.W (1971) MNRAS., 152, 75.[20] Carr, B.J.(1976) Astrophys.J., 206,10.[21] Beiser, A. (1967) Concepts of Modern Physics, McGraw-Hil l, Portuguese version (1969) Ed. Poligno, S.Paulo, p.223.[22] Alonso, M.and Finn, E.(1967)Fundamental University Physics,Addison-Wesley,Portuguese version (1972) Ed. Blücher, S.Paulo, p.79-80.[23] Alonso, M.and Finn, E.(1967)Fundamental University Physics,Addison-Wesley,Portuguese version (1972) Ed. Blücher, S.Paulo, p.89.