Post on 22-Nov-2014
description
Peak Oil meets Peak Water: Moving towards Unitization of
Shared Groundwater
W. Todd Jarvis
Program in Water Conflict Management and Transformation
“Water is the oil of this century.” Dow Chemical Chair Andrew Liveris,
World Economic Forum, February, 2008
Overview
Peak Oil versus Peak Water Unitization Concepts Examples where it works Conclusions
Peak Oil
www.almc.army.mil/.../JulAug99/MS406c2.jpg
Hubbert Curve
Peak Water
From Palaniappan and Gleick, 2009
Non-renewable Groundwater
Peak Ecological Water
Oil business terminology Consolidation of all, or a large percentage of royalty or participating interests, in a “pool” as will permit reservoir engineers to plan operation of the pool.
In the case of groundwater “…government-mandated unitization of groundwater … is a solution to excessive access and drawdown … a
single “unit operator” extracts from and develops the reservoir. All other parties share in the net returns as
share holders.” Libecap (2005)
What is Unitization?
Post-Modern Geohydrologic Balance: New Shareholders for Groundwater
Diagram from Ragone (2007)
GW and SW Inflows
GW and SW Outflows Net GW Availability
Pumpage
Water Manufacturing/ Conservation
Contamination Baseflow- Ecosystem
Maintenance
Virtual Water Imports/Exports
Changes in Precipitation
Changes in Land Use &
Cover
Damage to Aquifer Storage?
1992 1994 1995 1996 1993 0
20 40 60 80
100 120 140 160 180 200
Aver
age
Prod
uctio
n (G
PM)
Sn
ow
me
lt
Sn
ow
me
lt
Sn
ow
me
lt
Sn
ow
me
lt
Sn
ow
me
lt
Rated Well Capacity
From Matyjasik, Yonkee and Jarvis, 2002
Probably the biggest challenge, but not insurmountable
Oil Units – based on subsurface faults, permeability barriers, assured productive limits of reservoir
Diagram from Kumar (2007)
The Boundary Issue
Adaptive mgmt. with new data
Southern Nevada Water vs. UT
Adapted from High Country News, 2009
Nevada Utah Cave Valley Ranch paid $4M by SNWA to not develop water on 1,500 acres
Mississippi vs. Memphis, TN
From Cameron, 2009 Mississippi
Tennessee
Seeking $1Billion in damages
Diagram courtesy of Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation
Unitizing “Oregon’s Oil”?
Washington
Blurring the Boundaries Negotiation
Stage Common
Water Claims
Collaborative Skills
Geographic Scope
Core Motive Influencing
Decision Making
Adversarial Rights Trust-building Nations Institutions
Reflexive Needs Skills-building Watersheds Information
Integrative Benefits Consensus-building
“Benefit-sheds”
Incentives
Action Equity Capacity-building
Region Identity
Adapted from Jarvis and Wolf, in review
The real benefit is in the emerging use of managed recharge applications – i.e., Kumamoto, Japan
Well interference issues and costs minimized – SNWA vs. Utah and the recent $4Million “payoff”
Increase private investment in ASR and non-renewable groundwater - Similar to secondary and tertiary oil recovery operations
May promote groundwater exploration and development on federal lands because of success of oil unitization
Benefits of Unitization?
Conclusions Peak Water can learn from Peak Oil
Unitization of groundwater is a pro-market approach to decreasing conflict over water resources and increasing water availability.
Unitization of groundwater may lessen damage to the storativity of hard rock aquifers.
Unitization concepts are currently applied nationally and internationally for groundwater
exploitation and managed recharge.
Thank you for your attention.