Post on 02-Jan-2016
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 1/28 •
IFIP IT-STAR-MeetingIFIP IT-STAR-Meeting 1616. Oct. 2003. Oct. 2003
Budapest Budapest
Mag. Michael WIESMÜLLER Mag. Michael WIESMÜLLER
Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and TechnologyFederal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology
Austria and Austria and the IST-Programmethe IST-Programme
Remarks – Lessons LearntRemarks – Lessons Learnt
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 2/28 •
INDEXINDEX
• Some words on AustriaSome words on Austria• FP 5 (IST) – what happened + someFP 5 (IST) – what happened + some resultsresults• Conclusions from FP 5Conclusions from FP 5• FP 6 (IST) – what is new?FP 6 (IST) – what is new?• IST 6 Call 1 – main resultsIST 6 Call 1 – main results• Lessons learntLessons learnt
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 3/28 •
Starting point:Starting point:Austria Austria
Macro-IndicatorsMacro-Indicators
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 4/28 •
Area ..........................Population ................GDP/capita ...............GERD/GDP ..............BERD/GOVERD/OTHGDP/EU-Share .........
• D..................................• S .................................• NL................................• FIN ..............................• DK ..............................
http://www.austria.gv.at/
84.000 sq km8,1 Mill.27.000 $ (=rank 5 in EU 15)1,95% (perhaps: 2,5% in 2005)40% - 40% - 20%2,42% (2001)
• 23,9%• 2,9%• 4,7%• 2,1%• 1,6%
...just to remind you...
AUSTRIAEU-Member since 1995
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 5/28 •
• „lack“ of RTD-intensive large-industry (compared f.ex. with Scand, NL or IRL)
• low rate of industry research (BERD)• prominent share of the public sector in
R&D (GOVERD)• few RTD-employees• Industrial structure with emphasis on
traditional (low- to mediumtech) sectors
• a lot of highly innovative SME‘s• Growth of RTD > Growth of
GDP• high productivity rate• low unemployment-rate (1999:
Rank 2 in EU)• Gov. Programme in order to
raise RTD/GDP (2,5% in 2005)
Austria‘s famous old structures/high-performance Paradox:AT is dominated by „traditional industries“ (metals, machinery, paper), yet has steep increase of productivity, GDP growth is over average, low
unemployment, growing EU-market share a.s.o.
http://www.tip.ac.at
Some remarks on AT-Innovationsystem
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 6/28 •
IST in the 5IST in the 5th th
Framework-Framework-programmeprogramme
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 7/28 •
IST and FP 5 – the dimensionsIST and FP 5 – the dimensions
Budgetbreakdown 5th FP
Quality of Life
IST
Growth
JRC
Energy, Sustainable
develop.
Intern. Role
Promotion of SME's
IHP
Nuclear Energy
Austrian RTD-Expenditures(1999)
ISTKA1: Systems and services for the citizenKA2: New methods of work + electronic commerceKA3: Multimedia content and toolsKA4: Essential technologies and infrastructuresCPA: Cross Programme ActionsFET: Future and emerging technologiesRN : Research Networks
3,6 Bill. €3,6 Bill. €
Total: 13,6 Bill. €
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 8/28 •
Keyfigures IST FP 5Keyfigures IST FP 5
ATAT
1.2941.294300300
2.0012.001449449
23,2%23,2%8282
126126
EUEU
10.549..........10.549..........2.687 ...........2.687 ...........72.733 .........72.733 .........18.503 .........18.503 .........25,5% ..........25,5% ..........3.463 ...........3.463 ...........5.983 ...........5.983 ........... 2,7%2,7%
Submitted proposals.........................Submitted proposals.........................Successful proposals........................Successful proposals........................Submitted partners ...........................Submitted partners ...........................Successful partners ..........................Successful partners ..........................Pass rate (rel. to proposals) ............Pass rate (rel. to proposals) ............Funding (M€) ...................................Funding (M€) ...................................Costs Partner (M€) ..........................Costs Partner (M€) ..........................Share funding NAS ..........................Share funding NAS ..........................
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 9/28 •
IST FP 5 – an all over pictureIST FP 5 – an all over picture
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
KA1 KA2 KA3 KA4 CPA FET RN SUP
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%submitted Proposals
successful Proposals
Succesrate
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 10/28 •
IST FP 5 – Austrian PerformanceIST FP 5 – Austrian Performance
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
KA I KA II KA III KA IV CPA FET RN SUP
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%submitted Proposals
successful Proposals
AT-Succesrate
EU-Succesrate
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 11/28 •
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
D UK F I EL E B NL S A FIN DK P IRL L
share of funding
GDP-Index (1998)
IST FP 5 – Share of funding vs. share of GDPIST FP 5 – Share of funding vs. share of GDP
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 12/28 •
IST FP 5 – Cooperation NAS – EU 15IST FP 5 – Cooperation NAS – EU 15
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
BG CY CZ EE HU LT LV MT PL RO SI SK
UK
S
P
NL
L
IRL
I
FIN
F
EL
E
DK
D
B
A
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 13/28 •
IST in FP 5 – Some conclusions (1) IST in FP 5 – Some conclusions (1)
• FP is proven mechanism for internationalisation
and networking of RTD-players
• Quantity of RTD-funding is highly relevant
on national level
• FP has advantages for smaller countries (competition
under controlled conditions, fair access)
• FP allows boost of national strenght
• Good mix between focus and broad coverage
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 14/28 •
IST in FP 5 – Some conclusions (2)IST in FP 5 – Some conclusions (2)
• Share of funding to NAS-countries is very low (2,7% = approx. share of Sweden)• Too much „small stuff“ (2.700 Contracts!)• Time-to-contract problem: cycles of techn. developm. are shorter than the programme• Administrative overhead is tremendous (INFSO Staff: 1.050) • Impact on europ. competitiveness is too low • Missing link to national activities (coexistence instead of cooperation or intergration)
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 15/28 •
IST in FP 6 IST in FP 6
What‘s new?What‘s new?
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 16/28 •
FP 6 Budgets and structureFP 6 Budgets and structure
Budget 6.RP (2002-2006):Thematic Priorities
Total: 16,3 Bill. €
Information Society technologies
32%
Combating major diseases 10%
Advanced genomics and its applications for health
10%
Aeronautics and space10%
Food safety and health risks
6%
Sustainable Energy Systems
7%
Citizens and Governance in an open European
knowledge-based society 2%
Global change and ecosystems
6%Sustainable surface
transport 5%
Nanotechnologies, intelligent materials, and
new production processes12%
Genomics and biotechnology for health
Sustainable development
3,6 Bill. €3,6 Bill. €
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 17/28 •
Actiontyps Instruments
RTD-Projects Thematic Networks (TN) Accomp. Measures (AM) Take-ups .... 12 more
Networks of Excellence (NoE) Integrated Projects (IP)
STREPS Coordinationsactions (CA) Specific Support Actions (SSA)
NewInstruments
stairways ofexcellence
5. RP 6. RP
FP 5 vs. FP 6FP 5 vs. FP 6
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 18/28 •
IST – FP 6IST – FP 6Call 1Call 1
First Conclusions,First Conclusions,StatisticsStatistics
on funding &on funding &role of role of
instrumentsinstruments
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 19/28 •
Some draft conclusions form 1Some draft conclusions form 1stst Call Call
• Despite new regulations: several projects with top-qualityDespite new regulations: several projects with top-quality• Good coverage – good response to SOGood coverage – good response to SO• Oversubscription in tolerable marginsOversubscription in tolerable margins• IP: „center of gravity“ (60% of budget)IP: „center of gravity“ (60% of budget)• NoE: instrument in „steep lerning curve“NoE: instrument in „steep lerning curve“• Ratio STREP – IP/NoE 1:3 instead of 1:2Ratio STREP – IP/NoE 1:3 instead of 1:2• Considerable cuts of Giga-Projects (> 40 Mill. €)Considerable cuts of Giga-Projects (> 40 Mill. €)• More industry and market drivenMore industry and market driven• Shortage of IP/NoE over 48 monthShortage of IP/NoE over 48 month• SME-participation declining SME-participation declining • Accession and Associated Countries: still low funding shareAccession and Associated Countries: still low funding share• Lack of coordinators from large companiesLack of coordinators from large companies
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 20/28 •
Keyfigures 1st IST-Call*Keyfigures 1st IST-Call*
ATAT
3313316161
538538122122
21%21% 25-30*25-30*
EUEU
1.397 ...........1.397 ........... 236 ............236 ............19.960 ...........19.960 ........... 4.098 ...........4.098 ........... 17% ............17% ............ 1.071 ...........1.071 ........... 57% - 18% - 25%57% - 18% - 25% 3%3%
Submitted proposals.........................Submitted proposals.........................Successful proposals........................Successful proposals........................Submitted partners ...........................Submitted partners ...........................Successful partners...........................Successful partners...........................Pass rate (rel. to proposals) .............Pass rate (rel. to proposals) .............Indicative funding (in Mill. €) ............Indicative funding (in Mill. €) ............Ratio instruments IP – NoE – old......Ratio instruments IP – NoE – old......Share funding ACC............................Share funding ACC............................
*indicativ
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 21/28 •
Instruments: where does the funding go to?Instruments: where does the funding go to?
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
IP NoE STP SSA CA
Funding in M€
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 22/28 •
Results 1Results 1stst Call: Projects - Instrument Call: Projects - Instrument
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
IP NoE STP SSA CA
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Submissions
Succesful subm.
Successrate
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 23/28 •
AT- AT- Performance – Projects and InstrumentsPerformance – Projects and Instruments
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
IP NoE STP SSA CA
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%Submissions
Succesful subm.
Successrate
Prg.-average
AT- Successrate
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 24/28 •
SME-Performance (FP 5 – FP 6)SME-Performance (FP 5 – FP 6)
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Share submission Share successfulsubmission
Share funding
RP 5
RP 6
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 25/28 •
Instruments: Instruments: „Winner & Loser“„Winner & Loser“
Distribution of Funding/Instruments/Countries (standardised to programme average/17 leading countries)
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
DE FR UK IT ES BE NL GR SE AT FI CH IL NO DK PT IE
IP
NoE
OldInstr.
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 26/28 •
Distribution of Funding/Instruments/Country(standardised to programm-average/ACC Countries)
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
PL HU CZ SI CY RO BG MT LT EE SK LV
IP
NoE
OldInst.
Instruments: Instruments: „Winner & Loser“ ACC„Winner & Loser“ ACC
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 27/28 •
Lessons learnt & closing remarksLessons learnt & closing remarks
• Concentrate forces on „big shots“Concentrate forces on „big shots“• Money is in the IP‘sMoney is in the IP‘s• Create incentives for potential proposers Create incentives for potential proposers AT-example: funding for proposal preparationAT-example: funding for proposal preparation• Improve information services to proposers at all levelsImprove information services to proposers at all levels• Build a good and reliable NCP-NetworkBuild a good and reliable NCP-Network• Find strong EU-partners + try to establishFind strong EU-partners + try to establish long-term commitmentslong-term commitments• Improve networking at all levelsImprove networking at all levels• Enhance visibility of national excellence to EU-MemberstatesEnhance visibility of national excellence to EU-Memberstates• Integration is a long-term processIntegration is a long-term process• Get involved in strategic planning on EU-levelGet involved in strategic planning on EU-level• Try to mobilize EvaluatorsTry to mobilize Evaluators
• IT-STAR-Meeting Budapest • 28/28 •
ContactContact
Mag. Michael WiesmüllerMag. Michael WiesmüllerFederal Ministry of Transport. Innovation and Technology Federal Ministry of Transport. Innovation and Technology
Austrian ISTC-DelegateAustrian ISTC-Delegatemichael.wiesmueller@bmvit.gv.at
Mag. Reinhard GoeblMag. Reinhard GoeblFederal Ministry of Transport. Innovation and Technology Federal Ministry of Transport. Innovation and Technology
Austrian ISTC-DelegateAustrian ISTC-Delegatereinhard.goebl@bmvit.gv.at
Dr. Klaus Bernhardt (NCP)Dr. Klaus Bernhardt (NCP)BITBIT
Austrian National Contact PointAustrian National Contact Pointbernhardt@bit.ac.at