Inventing the Joint Strike Fighter - aereo.jor.br

Post on 03-Nov-2021

12 views 1 download

Transcript of Inventing the Joint Strike Fighter - aereo.jor.br

Inventing the Joint Strike Fighter

Dr. Paul BevilaquaLockheed Martin Skunk Works

General Arrangement

Length 50 ft

Span 35 ft

Wing area 450 sq ft

Empty Weight 30,000 lbs

AB Thrust 40,000 lbs

Vertical Lift 40,000 lbs

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Relative Size of Naval JSF

JSF1018010

Length 51 ftSpan 43 ftWing Area 620 ftInternal Fuel 19,500 lbSpot Factor 1.09

Length 47 ftSpan 30 ftWing Area 240 ftInternal Fuel 7,900 lbSpot Factor .82

Length 56 ftSpan 37 ftWing Area 400 ftInternal Fuel 10,800 lbSpot factor 1.0

2 2 2

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Service Needs

• USMC 609− STOVL Strike Fighter to Replace

the AV-8B and F/A-18C/D

• RN and RAF 150− Supersonic STOVL Replacement

for the Sea Harrier and GR-7

• USAF 1763− Stealthy Strike Fighter to

Replace the F-16 and A-10

• USN 480− Stealthy Strike Fighter

3000 US/UK Joint Strike Fighters

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

JSF Family of Aircraft

Length 51 ftSpan 43 ftWing Area 620 ft2

Internal fuel 19,500 lbs

Naval

Length 50 ftSpan 35 ftWing Area 460 ft2

Internal fuel 13,250 lbs

STOVL

Length 50 ftSpan 35 ftWing Area 460 ft2

Internal fuel 18,500 lbs

CTOL

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

JSF Commonality

Cousin Parts

Designed for Self Defense

360o Visibility

AESA Long Range Radar

Twin Verticals

High T/ W

Low Span Loading

Low W / S

High CL max

2 Internal AIM 120’s

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Designed for Ground Attack

Low IR Signature

Internal Precision Guided WeaponsAgile

Stable Target Tracking

Good Field of View

Low Vulnerability

Supersonic SpeedsInternal EO Systems

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Designed for Low Vulnerability

Hot Parts Aft

Fuel Tank Inerting

Multiple Fuel Tanks

Pilot Protection

Dry Bay Fire Protection

Jettisonable Weapons

Multiple Load Paths

Redundant Control Surfaces

Air Start System

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Designed for Maintainability

Integrated Subsystems

Auxiliary Power UnitOn Board Diagnostics

Advanced Cockpit

Self Contained Ladder

OBOGS

OBIGGS

Benign Footprint

Single Point Systems Check

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

F-16C

F/A-18C

Sustained G’s

USAF

USMC/RN

USN

ADVANTAGE

Transonic Acceleration

F-16C

USMC/RN

USN

USAF

F/A-18C

Air to Air Combat Performance

F-16C

F/A-18C

USAF

USMC/RN

Instantaneous G’s

USN

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Naval F-35C Mission Performance

730 w/ TanksMission Radius - nm 600

USN Profile: (2) 2K lb JDAM + (2) AIM-120

Opt M/Alt Cruise

FLOT

400 nm

Combat @ 35K ft

Drop A-G Weapons

JSF 768

F/A-18C 329

927 2x 480 galTanks

547 3x 330 galTanks

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT For Official Use Only

USMC F-35B Mission Performance

Mission Radius - nm

USMC Interdiction B: (2) 1K lb JDAM + (2) AIM-120

50 nm

Opt M/Alt CruiseIngress• 540 KTAS/15,000 ft

FLOT

/Egress

Drop A-G Weapons

550 w/ Tanks450

JSF 473 663 2x 480 galTanks

F/A-18C 375Lot XIX w/ (2)1K JDAM+(2)AIM-120+(5)Pylons + Gun

AV-8B 273

2x 330 galTanks504

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT For Official Use Only

How We Won: The X - Planes

“Lockheed won by proposing a very innovative lift fan” - Boeing

“Lift Fan Puts LockMart over the Top” - Aviation Week

“Lift Fan Carries LM to Victory” - Interavia

Lift Fan Propulsion System

Lift Fan

ClutchFan Drive Shaft

Roll Control Jets

Thrust Vectoring Nozzle

Cruise Engine

AV-8 Harrier Adopted by US Marine Corps1970

The Harrier Approach Isn’t Supersonic

F-104 Starfighter

15,000 lbs Thrust

Mach 2

AV-8B Harrier

20,000 lbs Thrust

M < 1

Design Missions

Requirements AnalysisWilloughby Templates

SEGMENT

NEED

MISSION

VTOL Requirement Sizes the Engine

VTOL Design Point

CTOLDesign

Point

Sustained Turn Instantaneous Turn

TransonicAcceleration

STO

VL

1.2

1.3

1.0

1.1

.8

.9

00 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Wing Loading (WTO / S)

Thrust toWeightRatio

(TSL / WTO )

Engine Requirements Analysis

Segment

Need

Feature

ShortTake Off

WingLift

JetLift

VectorThrust

JetFlap

HighT/W

SubsonicCruise

LowSFC

Combat

MixedFlow

HighT/W

LowIR

LowBPR

LowDrag

HighTSP

LowSFC

VariableBypass Ratio

HighBPR

AftNozzle

VerticalLanding

ReactionControl

HighT/W

LowHGI

Balance ColdJets

SupersonicAcceleration

ThrustTransfer

HighBPR

The Basic Problem: Not Enough Thrust, and It’s Too Far Aft

Weight, 30K lbs

Thrust, 20K lbs

Goal

Weight, 30K lbs

Thrust, 18K lbs Thrust, 18K lbs

Conventional F-16

“V/STOL” F-16

Weight, 30K lbs

Thrust, 18K lbs Thrust, 18K lbs

Solving the Basic ProblemNot Enough Thrust, and It’s Too Far Aft

Means toExtract Power

• Turbines• Scoops• Regeneration• Heat Pipes• Alternator• Generator • MHD• EFD

Means toTransfer Power

• Shafts• Ducts• Heat Pipes • Laser Beams• Chain Drive• Fiber Optics• Wires• Hydraulics

Means toProduce Thrust

• Fans• Rockets• Pulse Jets • Ram Jets• Ejectors• Explosions• MHD• EFD

Shaft Driven Lift Fan Propulsion Concept

JSF119-611 Engine

JSF0419013

Shaft Driven Lift Fan Propulsion Concept

JSF119-611 Engine

JSF0419013

F-35 Propulsion System

JSF119-611 Engine

JSF0419013

Turboshaft EngineProvides Shaft Power, but no Cruise Thrust

Turbofan EngineProvides Cruise Thrust, but no Shaft Power

Alternative Types of Turbine Engine

Extracting Shaft Power

.

Open

Closed

Comparison with LM Lift/Cruise Systemat 40,000 lbs of thrust

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

SDLF DL

Engine

Weight (lbs)

RCS

Inlet

Systems

Nozzle

Lift Fan

Engine

Design Options

Number of Alternative Aircraft Is Too Large

Horizontal Stabilizer Assessment

Lift Fan Installation

JSF STOVL Propulsion System

AV-8B Harrier and the F-35 Musketeer

Fan AugmentationHot Gases AftContinuous Thrust VectoringLift Improvement DevicesPoor Supersonic Area DistributionOvertemp Reduces Engine LifeWater Injection RequiredSide by Side Jets Permit Hot Gas IngestionCompressor Air for Reaction Control Jets

Fan AugmentationHot Gases Aft

Continuous Thrust VectoringLift Improvement Devices

Good Supersonic Area DistributionNo Reduction of Engine LifeNo Water Injection Required

Tandem Jets Prevent Hot Gas IngestionFan Air for Reaction Control Jets

Lockheed Martin Common Strike Fighter

STOVL

CTOL

TFX: The Challenge of Joint Aircraft

USAF F-111

USN F-14 (F-111N)

Technology Assessment Contracts1993

Lockheed Skunk WorksShaft Driven Lift Fan $40M

McDonnell DouglasGas Driven Lift Fan $35M

Demonstrate propulsion and airframeperformance through ground test

McDonnell Douglas Gas Driven Lift Fan Concept1993

Boeing Lift / Cruise Engine Concept1994

Engine

Nozzle

Lockheed Martin Large Scale Powered Model1995

Lockheed Martin Large Scale Powered ModelNASA Testing

Boeing Large Scale Powered Model1996

JSF Concept Demonstrator Awards1996

Boeing X-32

Lift / Cruise Engine

Lockheed Martin X-35

Shaft Driven Lift Fan

• Mature Technologies to Reduce Risk

• Build Aircraft to Validate Performance

• Refine the Design, as Necessary

JSF01070

• Build Two Aircraft, but Fly All Three Variants

• Fly the Production Configurations

• Demonstrate STOVL Performance and Supersonic Speed

• Prove Handling Qualities and Carrier Suitability

Lockheed Martin Demonstrator Approach

X-35 Commonality

X-35 Number 2

X-35 Number 1

Carrier X-35C

CTOL X-35A

STOVL X-35B

Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company

Validation by High Fidelity Demonstrators

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Full Scale validation by high fidelity demonstrators CTOL30 Days total test time 27.4 Hours tested 27 Flights Mach 1.05 CV12 weeks total test time 58 Hours tested 73 Flights 252 FLCPs Mach 1.22 STOVL 6 weeks total test time 21.5 Hours tested 39 Flights 17 Vertical takeoffs 27 Vertical Landings 14 Short Takeoffs 6 Short landings 2 X mission flights Mach 1.2

CTOL USAF Variant

• 27 Flights totaling 27.4 Hours over 30 Days• LM, BAE SYSTEMS, MOD, and DOD Pilots Flew the X-35A• “People were stunned” Gen Mike Hough, USMC

Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company JSF0419027

Conversion to STOVL Variant

JSF0419030

Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company JSF0419031

• Only Aircraft To Fly Supersonically, Hover, and Land Vertically in the Same Flight

– Major Art Tomassetti, USMC, 20 July 2001• 38 Flights in 21.5 Hours

STOVL USMC / Royal Navy Variant

40,000 lbs of Vertical Lift from Just 4 Nozzles

48%

9%

43%

Lift Jet Characteristics

Infrared Lift Jet Visualization

Naval Variant Over Annapolis

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Edwards Air Force Base• 38 Flights in 33.2 Hours• Use of a Side Stick Demonstrated• Carrier Approaches Flown

Pax River Naval Air Station• 33 Flights in 18.9 hours• Carrier Landings Simulated• Envelope Expanded to M = 1.2

First X-plane to fly across the US• 2 Flights• 5.9 Flight Hours

JSF STOVL Variants

32,000 lbs of Thrust 40,000 lbs of Thrust

What You See, Is What You Get!

2001 Collier Trophy

Awarded for " the greatest achievementin aeronautics or astronautics in America, demonstrated during the preceding year “ to the F-35 Lift Fan Propulsion System

Joint Strike Fighter - Economies of Scale

F-16 Falcon

AV-8 HarrierF-18 Hornet

A-10 Warthog

USAF 1765

USN 480

USMC 610

UK 150

FMS 3000

Total of 6000 aircraft

Total of $200B

The Netherlands

Italy

Norway

Denmark

Canada

Turkey

U.K.

Australia

United States

International Coalition Investing in JSF

This is a Team Success