Post on 18-Jul-2015
AGSD Evaluation ToolBuilding Our Model
Alaska Gateway School District Educator Evaluation System
Information
Sources
Evaluation
ComponentsRequired level of support
Instruction
Planning
Professionalism
Environment
*The four Cultural Standards for
Educators must be incorporated
into the evaluation process.
SLO’s
Cultu
ral S
tandard
s*Two valid,
reliable
measures of
student
performance
• Observations: (In development)
• Information from
parent,
students, etc…
• Other
information as
determined by
district
Unsatisfactor
y
Basic
Proficient
Exemplary
Goals Streamlined - The process should be easily understandable
for all, not so burdensome that it isn’t used effectively
Linked –Observations, walkthroughs, lenses, etc. should be focused on indicators that link directly to our framework for usable data.
Supportive – All aspects should lead to supportive discussions and next steps that improve practice.
Useful for professional development – by school, district, or individual. Data should help us make informed decisions about what type of PD support is needed.
The Concept
4 Performance Standards 1. Learning Environment
2. Planning
3. Instructional Delivery
4. Professionalism
These align as required by the State with the Alaska
Professional Teaching Standards. They also align with State
supported models such as Danielson and Marzano.
#1 Learning Environment
Physical Space
Climate
Management
Expanded Environments
#2 Instructional Planning
Demonstrates knowledge of content and curriculum
Demonstrates knowledge of student needs and
interests
Incorporates strategies/resources for best practices
Plans for long term and short term
#3 Instructional Delivery
Makes connections to establish relevance
Uses a variety of strategies and resources
Promotes critical thinking, collaboration, and self-
directed learning
Assessments guide instruction
#4 Professionalism
Professionalism toward students, school, community,
and the profession
Professionalism in learning communities and networks
Professional Development
Professional attitudes regarding State, district and
school policies, procedures, and regulations
Streamlining Our Work We will share the Google Folder “AGSD Teacher
Evaluation Model”.
Send me an email with or from your email account you use for your Google account (the one you use to share Google Docs) - tracie.weisz@gmail.com
I’ll share the folder with you (be patient! This may take a few minutes).
The folder contains 9 items. You will be using the first 8 in your work this morning. The last one is for the afternoon workshop.
Our Work Today GOAL: We need to determine what our proficiency
indicators will be within our 4 Performance Standards
OUTCOME: In your Performance Standard Worksheet
in your Google Doc, enter in the indicators your group
has chosen that fit within the Supporting Categories.
Our Work Today GOAL: We need to determine what our indicators will be
within our 4 Performance Areas
TASK: Your group will focus on one of the Performance Standards. You will be provided with a list of related indicators taken from EED-approved sources including; the Alaska Professional Teacher Standards, the Charlotte Danielson model, the Marzano model, and the CEL 5D+ (Washington State). Included are also the California Professional Teacher Standards, as these are utilized by the Alaska Mentor Project and are familiar to many new teachers. Your group will discuss the Performance Standard and its Supporting Categories, review the provided indicators, and begin to choose (adapt and re-word as necessary) indicators that clearly establish proficient-level teaching behaviors that align with the Supporting Categories given for that Performance Standard.
Specifics:Each group has been provided with the following:
A Performance Standard and its 4 Supporting Categories
A list of aligned indicators and sources
Copies of Charlotte Danielson and Marzano models to look at as examples for how proficiency indicators are written
Access to Google Docs folder for your group in which you can enter your group’s work