Post on 29-Nov-2014
description
7250 Redwood Blvd. Ste. 105
Novato, CA 94945
415.472.5100
www.channelmanagement.com
Channel Incentive Usage/Acceptance Study
www.channelmanagement.com
Survey Focus
• Perceived effectiveness across a variety of program types– Including gap in vendor/partner perceptions
• Gain deeper insight into MDF and Co-op practices– Overall– Inclusion of Social Media
• Areas of focus for 2011 (incentive programs and more)– Pain Points– Key Initiatives
www.channelmanagement.com
Incentive Programs Included
• Co-op/MDF• Opportunity Management• SPIF/Loyalty Programs (targeting sales reps)• Partner Rebates (headquarter)• End User Rebates• Trade-In Programs
www.channelmanagement.com
CCI provides solutions to Manage, Measure, and Optimizechannel incentive programs for improved ROI
www.channelmanagement.com
Incentive Solutions throughout the Demand Chain
Distributor Reseller Sales Reps Consumer
Co-op/MDF
Streamline management of joint marketing programs
Marketing Planner
Plan marketing programs, forecast and measure ROI SPIF & Rebates
Run short- and long-term incentive programs Sales Performance Rewards
Reward channel partners for attaining sales goals Trade In Rewards
Manage incentive programs requiring physical return of goods Opportunity Management
Deal Registration, Referral Rewards and Special Pricing
www.channelmanagement.com
Software and Services
Program Management
On Demand Software
Professional Services
Program and partner support streamlines operations and expedites fulfillment
Comprehensive application suite manages incentive activity across multiple programs
Industry expertise drives impactful program design and ongoing performance enhancements
www.channelmanagement.com
Hardware Software Storage Telecom Entertainment Other
Current Clients
www.channelmanagement.com
Methodology:
• Quantitative, multiple choice questionnaire • 15,000 vendors/30,000 partners• Where possible, many questions were “mirror image” to
compare perceptions between vendor/partner audiences• Focus on B2B Technology
– Hardware– Software– Office Automation– Telecommunications (hardware and services)
• Results are indicative of trends and attitudes
www.channelmanagement.com
Responder Profile: Manufacturer/Vendor Responses
• 65% Channel sales and marketing positions
• Primary regional scope: ~50% North America and ~50% Global
• Sell a majority (80%+) of their products through the channel
www.channelmanagement.com
Responder Profile: Partner Responses
• ~70% VARs – Remainder were managed services providers, direct marketers, ISVs
• Annual sales were evenly represented between $1MM to more than $20MM
7250 Redwood Blvd. Ste. 105
Novato, CA 94945
415.472.5100
www.channelmanagement.com
Program Usage
www.channelmanagement.com
Program Utilization: Manufacturer/Vendor Responses
Co-op/MDF Reimbursement 77.2%
Sales Rebates for Specified Sales Targets 62.0%
SPIF and Loyalty Programs Directed to Reseller Sales Reps 48.9%
SPIF Programs Funded by MDF and Other Soft Dollars 31.5%
Opportunity Management Rewards/Discounts 39.1%
Trade-In Programs Directed to End Users or Channel Partners 30.4%
End User Rebates—Post Purchase 23.9%
Co-op/MDF is the most commonly used program, with Channel Rebates and SPIFs coming in second and third respectively
www.channelmanagement.com
Program Utilization: Manufacturer/Vendor Responses
Co-op/MDF 40.2%
Opportunity Management Programs 44.8%
Marketing Resource Center 11.5%
Rebate and Incentive Programs 48.3%
Sales & Marketing Training for partners 57.5%
Lead management to channel partners 34.5%
Joint Business Planning 39.1%
Technical Training for Channel Partners 40.2%
In the context of all program types, incentive programs at large fall just behind Sales and Marketing Training in importance.
www.channelmanagement.com
Program Utilization: Manufacturer/Vendor Responses
Co-op/MDF 25.6%
Opportunity Registration/Management Programs 25.6%
Marketing Resource Center 43.0%
Rebate and Incentive Programs 18.6%
Sales and Marketing Training for Channel Partners 12.8%
Lead Management to Channel Partners 23.3%
Joint Marketing Planning/Joint Business Planning 20.9%
Technical Training for Channel Partners 20.9%
Vendors seem to have a love or hate relationship with Co-op/MDF and Opportunity Management, as they tie for second behind Marketing Resource center for LEAST effective channel program
www.channelmanagement.com
Program Utilization: Partner Responses
Co-op/MDF 50.1%
Opportunity Management 14.4%
Marketing Resource Center 14.1%
Volume Rebates 40.7%
Vendor-sponsored SPIF programs 49.1%
Sales and Marketing Training 39.2%
Receiving leads from vendors 40.5%
Joint Marketing Planning/Joint Business Planning 17.0%
Technical Training 32.1%
Partners feel that incentive programs are more important than Sales & Marketing training with Co-op/MDF, SPIF Programs, and Volume rebates leading.
www.channelmanagement.com
Program Utilization: Partner Responses
Opportunity Management Programs were ranked LEAST effective with Joint Marketing Planning as the second least effective vendor provided tools.
Partners and Vendors alike don’t feel that marketing resource centers are effective.
7250 Redwood Blvd. Ste. 105
Novato, CA 94945
415.472.5100
www.channelmanagement.com
Co-op /MDF Programs
www.channelmanagement.com
Co-op/MDF: Manufacturer/Vendor Responses
Online Advertising (Google Pay-Per-Click or similar) 11.3%
Application Development 10.0%
Public Relations 11.3%
Trade Show and Conference Attendance 37.5%
Offset Staffing Costs for Sales or Technical Specialist 10.0%
Website Development and Management 16.3%
E-mail Expenses 11.3%
Social Media 16.3%
Customer Events 47.5%
Biz Dev efforts are considered to be the most effective use of funds—at the effect of traditional marketing programs
www.channelmanagement.com
Co-op/MDF: Partner Responses
Preferred activities parallel that of vendors.
Partners believe that incentive programs and Biz Dev activities are the best use of funds to help build their business.
www.channelmanagement.com
Co-op/MDF: Manufacturer/Vendor Responses
Traditional Advertising efforts are losing favor among vendors.
Print advertising ranks higher than promotional give-awaysas the LEAST-effective reimbursable activity.
www.channelmanagement.com
Co-op/MDF: Partner Responses
Again, print based activity seems unpopular as does all traditional promotional activity
www.channelmanagement.com
Co-op/MDF: Partner Responses
Prompt approval/turnaround of funding request 64.2%
Prompt reimbursement 55.4%
Clear guidelines 34.6%
Easy claim submittal 60.4%
Reimbursement for lead generation and marketing activities 16.1%
Offset business development expenses (such as training, staffing,
demo equipment)21.1%
Predictable budgets 12.0%
Easy access to available allowances 17.9%
Claim and payment tracking 17.3%
When it comes to what partners seek most in a co-op /MDF program, simplicity and expediency are the most important characteristics
www.channelmanagement.com
Co-op/MDF: Partner Responses
Simplified guidelines and administration 51.5%
Faster payment and reimbursement 46.4%
More predictable allowances 23.1%
Joint marketing planning for optimal program usage 26.0%
Marketing assistance 26.0%
Improve program support and escalation processes 16.8%
Faster turnaround of funding requests/prior approvals 32.6%
Partners feel that vendors need to streamline their programs
www.channelmanagement.com
Co-op/MDF: Manufacturer/Vendor Responses
Improve analytics and ROI 60.8%
Improve partner support and issue resolution 25.3%
Improve marketing support/program planning 31.6%
Revise guidelines to better reflect company goals 24.1%
Faster payment process 12.7%
Global standardization 11.4%
Streamline administration 29.1%
Integration with SFA/CRM system 22.8%
Conversely, Vendors are more interested in improved analytics with a strong lead
7250 Redwood Blvd. Ste. 105
Novato, CA 94945
415.472.5100
www.channelmanagement.com
Social Media
www.channelmanagement.com
Social Media: Partner Responses
60% “No”
40% “Yes”
Only 40% of partners surveyed use social media
www.channelmanagement.com
Social Media: Partner Response
Of those that use social media, LinkedIn and
Facebook are the most popular.
www.channelmanagement.com
Responder Profile: Partner Responses
Only 12 % of Social Media programs are funded by
partner Co-op/MDF programs, in whole or part.
12%“Yes”
88% “No”
www.channelmanagement.com
Responder Profile: Manufacturer/Vendor Responses
60% of vendors responding currently do not support their partners for social media in any form. Of those that do, most supply content only.
Only 8% of vendors reimburse for social media activity through co-op MDF.
32%
31%
26%
8%
7250 Redwood Blvd. Ste. 105
Novato, CA 94945
415.472.5100
www.channelmanagement.com
Looking Ahead
www.channelmanagement.com
Looking Ahead: Manufacturer/Vendor Responses
Most respondents expect their channels to carry a higher percentage of total sales for 2011
66%
33%
1%
www.channelmanagement.com
Looking Ahead: Manufacturer/Vendor Responses
Correspondingly, vendors expect to recruit more partners in the new year
Increase 54%
Reduce 23%
Maintain 22%
www.channelmanagement.com
Looking Ahead: Manufacturer/Vendor Responses
Exactly half the audience expects their channel budget to grow 50% Grow
44% Maintain
6% Decrease
www.channelmanagement.com
Looking Ahead: Manufacturer/Vendor Responses
Despite an expected growth in total channel sales and partner population, just under half of the vendors expect to grow their channel management teams
53% Maintain
44% Grow
3% Decrease
www.channelmanagement.com
Looking Ahead: Manufacturer/Vendor Responses
Vendors are concerned about their partners’ ability to effectively sell and market.
The need for analytics and reduced complexity is also widespread
www.channelmanagement.com
Looking Ahead: Manufacturer/Vendor Responses
Analytics is the # 1 priority for vendors in the new year,
followed by Sales and Marketing initiatives
www.channelmanagement.com
Looking Ahead: Manufacturer/Vendor Responses
No Program Planned Maintain Increase
FocusDecrease
Focus
Co-op/MDF 10.0% (8) 61.3% (49) 27.5% (22) 1.3% (1)
Opportunity Management 14.5% (12) 33.7% (28) 51.8% (43) 0.0% (0)
Partner Analytics 14.6% (12) 25.6% (21) 59.8% (49) 0.0% (0)
Partner Lead Management 9.6% (8) 37.3% (31) 53.0% (44) 0.0% (0)
Marketing Resource Center 13.6% (11) 55.6% (45) 29.6% (24) 1.2% (1)
Rebate and Incentive Programs 6.2% (5) 48.1% (39) 44.4% (36) 1.2% (1)
Channel Sales and Marketing Training 2.4% (2) 45.8% (38) 51.8% (43) 0.0% (0)
Partner Portal/PRM/Back Office Systems 14.5% (12) 38.6% (32) 45.8% (38) 1.2% (1)
Partner Joint Marketing Planning 11.3% (9) 47.5% (38) 41.3% (33) 0.0% (0)
Vendors are increasing their focus on Channel Analytics and Lead Management, with Sales & Marketing Training and Opportunity Management tied for 3rd
www.channelmanagement.com
Looking Ahead: Partner Responses
Partners are concerned about their lack of Sales & Marketing capabilities. This is second, however to their concern about the impact of cloud computing and adapting to a managed service model.
7250 Redwood Blvd. Ste. 105
Novato, CA 94945
415.472.5100
www.channelmanagement.com
Conclusions
www.channelmanagement.com
Analytics
The Issue: Analytics is the #1 initiative expressed by Vendors• CCI has a library of ebooks and white papers available, as well as blog
topics– www.channelmanagement.com– blog.channelmanagement.com
• ID KPIs by “Program” as well as by “Partner”– Benchmark what successful partners are doing– Index individual partner performance based on those benchmarks
e.g.: 30% close ratio on deals registered within 60-days, or XX% utilization of MDF
• Consolidate costs and metrics for all programs to evaluate total investment in any one partner (Scorecard)
www.channelmanagement.com
Joint Marketing Planning (JMP)
• The issue: – Partners’ don’t see the value. Vendors are beginning to embrace it.
• The opportunity-- JMP is the best way to:– Forecast of sales and marketing activity, and – Help align resources and funding with partner goals
• Tips and Trends:– Use JMP to simplify existing processes, e.g.: MDF funding allowance or
claiming– Extending JMP to unmanaged partners to justify investment– Provide rewards to partners for updating plans to report on progress
against goals– Capturing ROI information of all activities against business goals
www.channelmanagement.com
Co-op/MDF
• The Issue:– “Most utilized program” among vendors, most popular among
partners. Yet, among “least effective” programs for vendors.
• The Opportunity:– Review program guidelines, revise to align with GTM strategy– Incorporate metrics to help evaluate spending against GTM goals
• Trends:– Simplify and streamline MDF program, e.g.: Reduce approval
requirements and accelerate partner reimbursement (less than 30-days from claim)
www.channelmanagement.com
Social Media
• The Issue: – Partners’ are not yet embracing social media as marketing vehicle
• The opportunity today– Still too early to formally include social media as a reimbursable activity
• Trends– Provide partners with tools they can use to support social media efforts
(white papers, YouTube video’s etc)– Share “how to” advice and best-practices with partners
www.channelmanagement.com
Deal Registration
• The Issue:– Partners and Vendors alike agree that Deal Registration programs are
providing diminishing returns
• The Opportunity:Has Deal Registration strayed from the initial promise?– Manage channel conflict– Convert “farmers” to “hunters”– Provide pipeline visibility
• The Trend– Many vendors are reviewing/revising structure, streamlining
administration
www.channelmanagement.com
Questions/Discussion
Craig DeWolf
VP Strategic Development
P: 415.526.3223
E: Craig.DeWolf@channelmanagement.com