In management of Bastaninejad, Shahin MD, Assistant Prof of ORL, TUMS Amir’Alam Hospital.

Post on 18-Jan-2018

220 views 0 download

description

Case #1 74 yrs old man Left Parotid Mass Clinically and Radiologically resembles to Warthin tumor Suffering from IHD and CHF What is the plan? FNA and F/U

Transcript of In management of Bastaninejad, Shahin MD, Assistant Prof of ORL, TUMS Amir’Alam Hospital.

In management ofIn management of

Bastaninejad, ShahinBastaninejad, Shahin MD, Assistant Prof of ORL, TUMS MD, Assistant Prof of ORL, TUMS

Amir’Alam HospitalAmir’Alam Hospital

Case #1

• 74 yrs old man• Left Parotid Mass• Clinically and Radiologically resembles to

Warthin tumor• Suffering from IHD and CHF

• What is the plan?• FNA and F/U

Case #2

• 44 yrs old Woman• Known case of HCC from 1yr ago• Rt. Parotid mass developed over 4mo• No sign or symptom of inflammation

• What is your plan?• FNA, further intervention depends on FNA

result, and the primary tumor status

Case #3• 60 yrs old man• Complains from Rt. Parotid swelling and

pain in 3 weeks• No collections in CT-Scan• Little response to IV antibiotics after 48 hour

• What is the plan?• FNA + US

Case #4

• A 20 yrs old girl suffering from Lt. parotid tail mass

• CT-Scan homogeneous mass in that region

• What is the plan?• FNA + FS

Case #5

• A 40 yrs old woman• Rt. Parotid mass for 6mo• Clinically and radiologically suspicious to

be malignant

• What is the plan?• FNA Preop. counseling• FS do appropriate surgical procedure

Case #6

• A 30 yrs old woman• Parotid mass for 2 yrs• 3*3, multilobulated, mobile mass in the

lower part of the Lt. parotid gland

• What is the plan?• FNA if you are scheduling the patient

for a Limited superficial parotidectomy

FNA and FSFNAFNA

• Sensitivity 85-90% • Specificity 92 to 100%

– Higher for benign lesions– Lower for Malignant lesions

• An FNA cytological diagnosis of malignant or neoplastic major salivary gland disease is generally predictive of the final histologic diagnosis

FSFS

• Sensitivity and Specificity near or a little bit more than FNA (specially it is more specific than FNA)

• ability to assess margins and lymph nodes at the time of surgery

• FS is better able to type the malignancy

FNA and FS

• In reality they are complementary: Sensitivity and Specificity, for FNA and FS combined, were more than 90% and 100%, respectively

• There are some pitfalls for FNA:– Lymphoma– Ex-Pleomorphic Carcinoma– Low grade MEC

When do we perform FNA?

• When there is diagnostic doubt as to whether we are dealing with a salivary or non-salivary lesion

• Whether the lesion is neoplastic or inflammatory

• When malignancy in a salivary lesion is suspected on clinical grounds

• When we wish to avoid surgery

FNA, Continue…

• Pre-operative counseling with a patient

with a suspicious mass

• Limited approaches to the lesion

When do we perform FS?• FS is recommended when cytology and/or

clinical findings are suggestive of malignancy• In instances of discordance between FNAC

findings on the one hand and clinical and radiologic findings on the other

• Instances in which FS is going to offer information that could alter the extent of the surgical procedure (elective neck dissection or no, lateral, or total parotidectomy).

FS, Continue…

• …Indicated for the assessment of

resection margins, lymph nodes and

recognition of tumor involvement of critical

anatomic structures