Post on 03-Jan-2016
description
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout
Construction Management
Senior Thesis Presentation
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
Building InformationFunction: Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Facility
Location: Rockville, MD
Cost: $233,400,000
Size: 290,000 ft2
Schedule: April 4,2003 – July 2005
Project PlayersOwner: Human Genome Sciences, Inc.
Architect/Engineer: Lockwood Greene Engineers
CM: Gilbane Building Company
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
Analysis 1 - 4D Modeling
Purpose of Analysis?Assist with coordination of equipment delivery
Show work flow of specific interior finishes and exterior wall system
Identify potential conflicts in the field
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
What is 4D Modeling?A 4D model is created by combining a 3D model with the appropriate scheduling data, hence adding the aspect of time.
Advantages of 4D ModelsImprove constructability
Ability to analyze activity sequencing
Identify spatial conflicts between crews
Improve work flow for subcontractors
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
Components of LSM ModelDepicts first floor only (sequence can be replicated for second floor)
Sequencing focuses on the “clean rooms” & MER room
Exterior metal wall panels & structural support
Metal Studs & Drywall
Epoxy flooring
Equipment Pads
Air Handling Units
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
Sequence of ActivitiesInstallation of steel tubing followed by wall panels
Metal studs
Drywall after building enclosure
Equipment pads after building enclosure
Epoxy flooring follows drywall and equipment pads
Air handling units delivered after epoxy has cured
Section of wall panels and equipment pads left out
Equipment pads & AHU
Epoxy floor for MER room
Steel tubing and wall panel
West Elevation of LSM Facility
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
LSM 4D Model
Created using Auto CAD, Microsoft Project, and Common Point
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
Analysis 2 – Exterior Wall System
Purpose of Analysis?Value Engineering
Add aesthetic value to facility
Reduce cost
Reduce duration
Improve constructability
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
Analysis of Exterior Wall System2” preformed metal wall panels as specified by architect
Two different systems were analyzed
Exterior Insulation and Finishes System
Architectural Precast Concrete PanelsEIFS Brick Finish
Precast Structure
Metal Wall Panels by “Centria”
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
Preformed Metal Wall PanelsDescription
Urethane Foam Insulation
Exterior 22 gage stainless steel w/embossed pattern
2”x8”x1/4” steel tubing @ 7ft. offset for support
Advantages
Installed easily and efficiently
Minimal maintenance required resulting in long service life
Resistant to impact and damage as well as the elements
Disadvantages
Long lead time associated with custom design
Costly to replace and install damaged panels
Buckling of panels is correct spacing is not allotted
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
Exterior Insulation and Finishes System
Description
2x4 stud framing
Plywood Substrate
4” EPS insulation w/adhesive
Base coat w/reinforcing mesh
Acrylic finish coat Detail of EIFS SystemAdvantages
Continuous insulation prevents water penetration
Very light system only 4pfs
Versatile system for numerous finishes, textures, and colors
Inexpensive system
Disadvantages
No interior drainage cavity which could cause mold if not installed properly
More susceptible to damage than other systems but inexpensive to repair
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
Architectural Precast Concrete Panels
Description
Manufactured in a plant then shipped to site
2” of concrete, 2” of polystyrene insulation, 2” of concrete
20’x10’ sections with a smooth gray finishAdvantages
No cold/hot weather issues
With proper coordination the schedule can be reduced
Quality assurance
Ability to be load bearing
Very durable
Disadvantages
Cost
Shipping panels to site
Could have long lead time for specialty shapes
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
Analysis of Exterior Wall System
Preformed Metal Wall Panel
Description Total Cost Total Weeks R - Value
Wall Panel $892,500 12 14.5
Steel Tubing $357,000 12 0
Total $1,249,500 24 14.5
Exterior Insulation and Finishes System
Description Total Cost Total Weeks R - Value
EIFS System 4" EPS $335,580 24 16.83
Premium Finish $65,331 6 0
Steel Tubing $357,000 12 0
Total $757,911 42 16.83
Architectural Precast Concrete Panels
Description Total Cost Total Weeks R - Value
Insulated Precast Concrete $910,350 4 10.4
Steel Tubing $73,661 1 0
Metal Studs $71,370 9 0
Total $1,055,381 14 10.4
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
Adjusted ValuesMetal Wall Panels
Duration: 14 weeks
EIFS
Duration: 25 weeks
Double Crew Size
Duration: 13 weeks
Cost: $901,425
Precast Concrete Panels
Duration: 10 weeks
* Best system for cost and duration is the EIFS System
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
Calculate Heat Transfer Through Wall
For metal wall panel: Heating: qx = ((70 – 8) * 35,700) / 14.5 = 152,648 Btu/h Cooling: qx = ((94 – 70) * 35,700) / 14.5 = 59,090 Btu/hFor EIFS: Heating: qx = ((70 – 8) * 35,700) / 16.83 = 131,516 Btu/h Cooling: qx = ((94 – 70) * 35,700) / 16.83 = 50,909 Btu/h
Difference Between Systems Heating: 152,648 Btu/h - 131,516 Btu/h = 21,132 Btu/h Cooling: 59,090 Btu/h - 50,909 Btu/h = 8,181 Btu/h = 0.68 tons
% Reduction of heating and cooling loads Heating: (21,132 Btu/h / 8,000,000 Btu/h) * 100 = 0.26% Cooling: (0.68 tons / 3,000 tons) * 100 = 0.02%
* The savings in operations cost for heating and cooling is negligible
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
ConclusionThe EIFS system would provide the most benefit to HGS
Increase aesthetic value
Reduce cost by $500,000 or $350,000
Impact schedule by +11 weeks or -1 week
Though negligible increase energy efficiency
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
Analysis 3 – Floor Covering
Purpose of Analysis?Value Engineering
Reduce installation time of floor covering
Improve constructability
Reduce cost
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
Analysis of Floor Covering for “Clean Rooms”
Quartzite Epoxy Flooring as specified by architect
Two different systems were analyzed
Bonded Conductive Terrazzo
Conductive Epoxy Terrazzo
Example of bonded terrazzo
Example of epoxy terrazzo
Epo-Rok Quartz by Valspar
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
Quartzite Epoxy FlooringDescription
¼” thick
Installed in 3 layers which each require 24 hours to cure
Epoxy shop coat, quartz aggregate, heavy epoxy coat
Various aggregate colors
Advantages
Seamless system
Resistant to chemicals, slip, and collection of dust
Very durable surface
Disadvantages
Takes time to install
Costly to replace and install damaged areas
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
Bonded Conductive TerrazzoDescription
Average thickness is 2” thick
Consists of a cementitious binder and an aggregate
Aggregate: marble, quartz, granite or glass
Terrazzo is poured in place, allowed to cure, ground down, then polished
Advantages
Resistant to impact damage and daily wear and tear
Resistant to chemicals due to conductive nature
Disadvantages
Can be difficult and expensive to repair
Not 100% resistant to liquid
Dividers requires at control joints to prevent cracking
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
Conductive Epoxy TerrazzoDescription
¼” thick
Consists of an epoxy binder and an aggregate
Aggregate: marble, quartz, granite or glass
Epoxy primer is set, epoxy system is toweled into place, grouted to fill voids, then polished and sealed
Advantages
Similar to that of the quartzite epoxy flooring
Disadvantages
One of the most expensive systems
Can be expensive and time consuming to repair
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
Analysis of Floor Coverings
Quartzite Epoxy
Description Total Cost Total Weeks
Epoxy with quartz chips $450,500 22
Total $450,500 22
Bonded Conductive Terrazzo
Description Total Cost Total Weeks
Bonded Conductive Terrazzo $742,000 118
Total $742,000 118
Conductive Epoxy Terrazzo
Description Total Cost Total Weeks
Conductive Epoxy Terrazzo $617,450 53
Total $617,450 53
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
ConclusionThe specified quartzite epoxy system would provide the most benefit to HGS
Least expensive system
Takes least amount of time to install
No more difficult or expensive to repair than other systems
Durable, chemical resistant, slip resistant, will not collect dust
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
Final ConclusionsBy incorporating a 4D model to the LSM facility the CM can:
Identify spatial conflicts between crews
Analyze activity sequencing
Visually interpret work to be done in the clean & MER rooms
An EIFS system would be a positive Value Engineering decision
Increase aesthetic value
Reduce total project cost
Will not impact the schedule
Use the specified floor covering for the “clean rooms”
The quartzite epoxy system is the least expensive and takes the least amount of time to install
Characteristics of other systems are not superior
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
Acknowledgements
The Architectural Engineering Dept.
Dr. John Messner
Dr. Michael Horman
Dr. David Riley
Human Genome Sciences
Raj Vora, PE
Joe Morin
Gilbane Building Company
Andy Faber
Chuck Brawley
Ted Trester
Mike Curry
Tim McNeal
Mark Rummel
Lola Poe Taylor
Shannon Croissette
Friends and Family
My Mom and Dad
My roommates
Fellow peers in AE
Human Genome Sciences
Large Scale Manufacturing Facility
Aaron Trout Senior Thesis 2005
Construction Management The Pennsylvania State University
Introduction
4D Modeling
Description
Model of LSM Facility
Exterior Wall System Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Heat Transfer
Conclusion
Floor Covering Description of systems
Cost and Schedule Impact
Conclusion
Closing Statements
Questions
Questions?