How to review an article already published in peer reviewed journal in social sciences

Post on 04-Jul-2015

408 views 0 download

description

A lecture note from Raj Kumar Bhattarai, Tribhuvan University, Faculty of Management, Nepal Commerce Campus, Kathmandu, Nepal. December 11, 2013

Transcript of How to review an article already published in peer reviewed journal in social sciences

Raj K. Bhattarai

Nepal Commerce Campus

Tribhuvan University

Article IDENTIFIERS

FORMAT of the article Phenomena of the INTEREST of the author(s) AIM or objectives of the article MEASUREMENT of the study matter ANALYSIS of the data RESULTS of the study TESTIMONY of the findings UNIFIED COMMENTS

Design framework: IF-I-AM-ART-UC

Description Paper 1 Paper 2 Paper 3 Paper N

Author(s)

Title

Key words

Journal name

Year

Volume (Issue)

Page range

Cited by

Study location

Article Identifiers

Format of the article

Description Paper 1 Paper 2 Paper 3 Paper N

Article type

Heading 1

Heading 2

Citation style

Reference period

Reference items

Number of table

Number of figure

Phenomena of interest

Description Paper 1 Paper 2 Paper 3 Paper N

Research gap

Research question(s)

Theoretical foundation

Conceptual framework

Aim in the article

Description Paper 1 Paper 2 Paper 3 Paper N

Objective/hypothesis 1

Objective/hypothesis 2

Objective/hypothesis 3

Objective/hypothesis N

Measurement of the mater

Description Paper 1 Paper 2 Paper 3 Paper N

Construct definition

Object identification

Attribute classification

Rater entity

Selection item-type

Answer scale

Enumeration and scoring

Analysis of the data

Description Paper 1 Paper 2 Paper 3 Paper N

Study context

Population and sample

Quantitative tools

Qualitative tools

Test and experiment

Modelling

Association/relations

Results of the study

Description Paper 1 Paper 2 Paper 3 Paper N

Result: Science

Result: Image

Result: Concept

Finding 1

Finding 2

Finding 3

Finding N

Conclusion

Future research prospect

Testimony of the findings

Description Paper 1 Paper 2 Paper 3 Paper N

Innovative contribution

Reliability test

Validity test

Limitations

Underlying assumptions

Fundamental claims

Justifications

Cited by

Agree with

Disagree with

Unified comment of the reviewer(s)

Description Paper 1 Paper 2 Paper 3 Paper N

Ontological comment

Epistemological comment

Implications of the article

Reviewer’s remark 1

Reviewer’s remark 2

Reviewer’s remark 3

Reviewer’s remark N

Thanks