Post on 29-Aug-2018
High Temperature Effects on Vessel Integrity
Marc Levin, Ayman ChetaMary Kay O’Connor Process Safety
Center2009 International Symposium
2
Outline
• Motivation• Basics / Basis for Pressure Vessel Design
Conditions• Mechanical & Metallurgical Failure Mechanisms• Corrosion Failure Mechanisms• Examples• References• Summary
3
4
5
6
Motivation
• Where pressure rise is modest, but temperature rise is significant, the impact of temperature on vessel integrity becomes more important.
• To determine the temperature when a instrumented barrier should activate, understanding of the damage potential to the vessel vs. temperature is needed.
7
8
Motivation
• Some uncontrolled reactions can cause a temperature excursion without an increase in pressure
Methanation
Hydrogenation/Saturation
Hydrocracking
Some Decomposition Reactions• In such systems, vessel safeguarding is not
accomplished thru pressure relief devices
Cannot expect pressure relief devices to open
Rely on other barriers, e.g., instrumented systems with temperature sensing combined with emergency depressuring (manual or automatic)
9
Motivation
• Potential vessel failure is still a concern because vessel integrity deteriorates at high temperature
• Exceeding the vessel ultimate tensile strength is only 1 of many potential failure mechanisms
Message: Determining the temperature where vessel damage could occur is complex; evaluating mechanical failure, such as excessive hoop stress alone, is not sufficient
10
Basics• The ability of a vessel to maintain integrity at a
given pressure also depends on the temperature
- Design pressure has a coincident design temperature
- Maximum Allowable Working Pressure (MAWP) has a coincident temperature rating (note: there is no MAWT)
• Sometimes, “design temperature” is based on target operating conditions, not what the vessel can take
• Documentation might not be readily available. Thus, it might require some digging to find the b i f th t t d “d i t t ”
11
Basis for Vessel Design Conditions
MechanicalDamage to vessel condition/properties
• Metallurgical – Changes in metal properties as a result of conditions
• Corrosion - Chemical or electrochemical attack as a result of its reaction with the environment
-----------------------------------------------------Target operating conditions
If design is based primarily on target operating temperature, then look for the appropriate design temperature for safeguarding vessel integrity
12
Additional Considerations
Vessel Constituents• Shell• Heads• Nozzles• Welds
If one is determining the temperature and pressure a vessel can withstand, each of these needs to be examined.
A Sampling of Failure Mechanisms
• MechanicalPlastic deformation (non-reversible)
• Damage (some common mechanisms)Chemical/Electrochemical attack - corrosion
Creep - stress induced time-dependent deformation under load
ErosionFatigue – repeated / fluctuating stresses, max < mat’l tensile
strength
FractureEmbrittlement – microstructural changes at high temp, H2
Thermal stresses – non-uniform temperature distribution/differing thermal expansion coefficients
13
API 571 – Damage Mechanisms Affecting Fixed Equipment in the Refining Industry - Section 4.0
14
Mechanical Failure
15
• Hoop (circumferential) stress• Longitudinal stress• Stresses on nozzles & welds
16
Mechanical Failure (cont’d)
Metallurgical Failure Mechanisms: Selected High Temperature Cases
17
Failure Mechanism
Mat’l Affected
Temp Range [F]
Description
Graphitization Carbon steel, 1/2Mo steel
800-1100°F Microstructure change after long-term, high temp. operation; carbide phases can decompose into graphite nodules
Spheroidization Carbon steel, low allow
steels
850-1400°F Microstructure change where carbide phases change from normal, plate-like
form to a spheroidal form; or agglomerate
885 F Embrittlement
400 series SS, Duplex
SS
600-1000°F Metallurgical change in alloys with ferrite phase leading to loss of toughness
Sigma phase Embrittlement
300 series SS,
400 series SS,
Duplex SS
1000-1750°F Formation of “sigma” metallurgical phase leading to loss of toughness
Creep Rupture All metals & alloys
700+°F Metal components slowly and continuously deform under load (< yield
stress) that can lead to rupture
18
Metallurgical Failure Mechanisms (cont’d): Selected High Temperature Cases
Failure Mechanism
Mat’l Affected
Temp Range [F]
Description
Thermal Fatigue
All mat’ls of construction
T200°F Cyclic stresses caused by variations in temperature that can lead to cracking
where movement/expansion is constrained
Short Term Overheating – Stress Rupture
All common mat’ls of
construction
Permanent deformation at relatively low stress levels from localized overheating, leading to bulging and rupture
Dissimilar Metal Weld Cracking
Ferritic (CS/low alloy) + Austenitic (300 series
SS)
510+°F Coefficients of thermal expansion between ferritic steels and 300 Series SSdiffer by 30% or more, leading to high stress at the heat affected zone on the ferritic side.
Corrosion Failure Mechanisms: Selected Moderate-High Temperature Cases
19
Failure Mechanism
Mat’l Affected
Temp Range
[F]
Description
Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking
300 Series SS, Ni alloys
140+°F Surface-initiated cracks on exposure to tensile stress, elevated temperature, and
aqueous chloride
Caustic SCC Carbon steel, Low alloy
steels, 300 Series SS
120+°F Surface-initiated cracks on exposure to tensile stress, elevated temperature, and
caustic
High Temp. Hydrogen Attack
Carbon steel, Various alloys
450+°F H2 reacts with carbides in steel to form methane (which remains trapped) leading to cracks causing loss of
strengthCarburization Carbon steel,
Fe or Ni alloys1100+°F Contact with carbonaceous mat’l leads
to absorption of carbon into metalDecarburization Carbon steel,
low allow steels
Removal of carbon/carbides from steel at high temperature, leaving an iron matrix and causing loss of strength
Oxidation Carbon steel, Fe or Ni alloys
1000+°F Metal converted to metal oxide
Sulfidation Fe, Ni, or Cu 500+°F Reaction of metal with sulfur
Example 1: Elastic and Ultimate Tensile Stresses
(API Std 530)
20
21
Example 2: Hoop Stress vs. Creep Life
22
Example 3: High Temperature Hydrogen Attack
Nelson Curves (API RP 941)
23
Example 4: Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking
24
Pinhole Leaks
Bushings
Spacer
Leaks in APTAC Magnedrive housing (Fall 2007 DIERS UG Presentation)
Examination – Pits Found on the ID of APTAC Magnedrive Housing – Chloride SCC
25
Example 5: Caustic Stress Corrosion Cracking Refinery Example – Caustic Wash Tower• Post-weld Heat
Treatment not done (temperature <150°F)
• Process upset 200°F
• Every weld in the tower cracked
26
Failure Mechanism Temperature Regimes
27
Considerations
• Will the vessel become permanently deformed or fail catastrophically? Some key mechanical properties, such as modulus of elasticity, yield strength, and tensile strength, reduce at higher temperatures.
• Will the vessel material be subjected to creep damage? See API 530
• Will the vessel see any other damage (accelerated corrosion, environmental cracking, ...etc.)? A materials/corrosion specialist should be consulted on a case-by- case basis. API 571 is very helpful and informative. 28
References• API RP 571 (Dec. 2003) – Damage Mechanisms
Affecting Fixed Equipment in the Refining Industry
• API Std 579 (June 2007) – Fitness-for-Service
• API Std 530 (Sep. 2008) – Calculation of Heater Tube Thickness in Petroleum Refineries
• API RP 941 (Aug. 2008) – Steels for Hydrogen Service at Elevated Temperatures and Pressures in Petroleum Refineries and Petrochemical Plants
• ASME Section II (July 2007) – Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code – Materials
• ASME Section VIII ( ) – Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code – Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels
29
30
Summary: High Temperature Effects on Vessel Integrity
• When evaluating the impact of high temperature, note that there are many failure mechanisms that could be relevant
• Mechanical strength (plastic deformation) is only one aspect of vessel integrity
• Consult a pressure equipment integrity expert (mechanical/metallurgical/corrosion) to evaluate the effect of high temperature on a vessel
31
32
33