High Performance Schools - New Buildings...

Post on 27-Jul-2020

1 views 0 download

Transcript of High Performance Schools - New Buildings...

ACHIEVEMENT

High Performance Schools

Bill Orr, Coalition for High Performance Schools

© 2013-14 162 of 56

2014

CA-CHPS

Criteria &

ZNE

William R. “Bill” Orr Executive Director Collaborative for High Performance Schools

© 2013-14 163 of 56

Making Every School an Ideal Place to Learn

© 2013-14 164 of 56

1) Student Performance &

Health

2) Conserve Resources

3) Environment

1. Protecting student and staff health and enhancing the learning environment

2. Conserving energy, water and other resources thereby reducing operating costs

3. Minimizing waste, pollution and environmental degradation

PRIORITIES

© 2013-14 165 of 56

CA-CHPS CRITERIATM

• Versions include 2002, 2006, and 2009

• Update cycle timed to correspond with Title 24 Energy Code and CALGreen (triennial) updates

© 2013-14 166 of 56

2014 CA-CHPS CATEGORIES & WEIGHTING

28%

% Points

Integration

IEQ

Energy

Water

Site

Materials

O&M

© 2013-14 167 of 56

ENERGY

2013 Title 24 Energy Standards • Overall 30% “better”

than 2008 standards

• Estimated 3% better than ASHRAE 90.1-2010

• Prescriptive Measures incorporated into 2014 CA-CHPS

• Effective 7/1/14

© 2013-14 168 of 56

ENERGY Design Toward Zero Net Energy (ZNE) • Energy Prerequisite

– 5% better than Title 24

• Superior Energy Performance

• ZNE Bonus – Solar Ready (CALGreen)

– ZNE Capable

– ZNE (Innovation)

La Escualita Phase I, Oakland, CA

© 2013-14 169 of 56

ASHRAE 90.1-1999

Net Zero Energy

Title 24 2001

Title 24 2008

Title 24 2005

0

NREL Maximum Technical Potential (with no renewables). Includes plug load savings.

ASHRAE 90.1-2010

Zero Energy Performance Index “zEPI” Scale Moving down the scale can be achieved by:

– Code compliance – More efficient

• Windows • HVAC • Lighting

– Integrated design • Daylighting • Natural ventilation

– Plug load reductions – Renewables

CBECS Median School

Title 24 2013 ASHRAE 90.1-2013

ENERGY

ASHRAE 90.1-2007

100

© 2013-14 170 of 56

EE 1.1 SUPERIOR ENERGY PERFORMANCE

0

10

20

30

40

Core

New

Mod

P

o

i

n

t

s

ZNE

% Reduction 2013 Title 24

© 2013-14 171 of 56

2014 CA-CHPS POINTS FOR ZNE

• 8 points - Energy Performance Prerequisite

• Up to 40 points - Superior Energy Performance

• 2 points - ZNE Capable

• 4 Innovation points – ZNE

55 possible points for ZNE

• Additional CHPS recognition of ZNE for CHPS Verified Projects

© 2013-14 172 of 56

MEASURED PERFORMANCE

© 2013-14 173 of 56

WHAT IS THE OPERATIONS REPORT CARDTM

• Online subscription service

• Guides you through key benchmarking steps

– Gather school-wide building/ systems data

– Survey faculty and staff

– Collect classroom measurements

– Complete ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager

– Perform water fixture and waste audits

Subject Grade

Energy Efficiency 76

Thermal Comfort 68

Acoustics 76

Visual Comfort 72

Indoor Air Quality 60

Water Conservation 55

Waste Management 61

Alexander Middle School

© 2013-14 174 of 56

1. Understand where we are so that we can improve

2. Validate the actual performance of high performance schools

3. Prioritize precious resources for improvements

4. Develop need and support for local school bonds

5. Measure before and after improvements

6. Implement project-based/place-based learning initiatives

WHY DO WE BENCHMARK?

© 2013-14 175 of 56

PROP 39 AND ORC

Tools and Resources

• CHPS Best Practices Manuals

• High Performance Transition Plan

• Operations Report Card (ORC) to benchmark non-energy benefits

© 2013-14 176 of 56

WHO DOES THE BENCHMARKING?

In-house led by facilities

manager

Yuba City Unified, Center

for Early Education

Process/walk-through

knowledge stays in-house

In-house led by students/

teachers

High Tech High Schools, Thomas

Jefferson High School

Opportunities for project-

based learning; green clubs or

STEM

In-house, with intern assistance

Adams 12 Five Star Schools

(CO)

Built relationship with local

college; staff still driving program

Implemented by third-party

consultants

LAUSD, Bakersfield USD, Bay City Schools

(FL)

Doesn’t add to workload of

staff; incorporate into

related scope Pro

s

Wh

o

W

hat

© 2013-14 177 of 56