Post on 16-Jun-2018
Harm and Safety Improvement in Womenrsquos Health Sue Gullo RN MS Director IHI
Annette Bartley RN MSc MPH Quality Improvement Consultant Health Foundation IHI Fellow 2006-2007
Middle East Forum
May 15 2016
1030-1215 pm
Introductions
bull Sue Gullo
bull Annette Bartley
Session overview
bull Pregnancy and childbirth are a critical time in not only the
womanrsquos health but that of her family and new-born It is
however only a snapshot in the lifespan of a woman
bull This session will explore the impact the social determinants of
health have on health and will provide an overview of key safety
interventions to address key clinical obstetric and neonatal events
that impact health and outcomes
Session objectives
bull Describe the social determinants of health and the impact
on the health of women and newborns
bull Discuss key safety interventions to address adverse
pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in the United States
and other countries
bull Discuss how these interventions can be introduced
Public Health
bull Public health is a broad subject that arguably embraces all
aspects of our lives from the air we breathe the food we eat the
place we live in work and leisure as well as our genetic ethnic
and cultural heritage
bull All these factors contribute to overall health
bull In order to create the best possible outcomes for women and
babies we need to take the wider social determinants of health
into consideration as we design our healthcare service
bull Health promotion plays a key factor
World Heath Organisation
What are social determinants of health
bull The social determinants of health are the conditions in which
people are born grow live work and age These circumstances
are shaped by the distribution of money power and resources at
global national and local levels The social determinants of health
are mostly responsible for health inequities - the unfair and
avoidable differences in health status seen within and between
countries
Figure 1 The Health Map determinants of health and well-being
From Barton H and Grant M (2006) A health map for the local human habitat The Journal for the Royal Society for the Promotion of health 126(6) pp 252-253 ISSN 1466-4240
Lets begin with the bigger picture
Public health message- Dubai
lt The Public Health amp Safety
Department has initiated a public service campaign to warn children amp pregnant women from entering
cafes with creative messages hung on all the cafes doors in Dubai
The messages will be addressed by the fetus or children amp aimed towards the parents smoking is
your choice not mine
lt Door-sized posters publicising the campaign have been plastered on cafe entrances across the
emirates where people go to smoke the hookah pipes
IHIrsquos Innovation Work
AIM
To develop a population approach to reduce preterm births among Medicaid (women receiving
insurance through the government supported plan)
recipient women
Methods
bull Evidence scan
bull 50+ expert interviewssite visits across 20 states to
identify best practices
bull Expert design meeting
bull Validate theory of change and bundle of interventions
bull Prototype test bundle of interventions with one community
Risk factors for preterm birth
Clinical risk factors bull A previous history of pre-term birth bull Multiple gestation bull Short interval between pregnancies bull Cervical length measured during
pregnancy bull Age (lt16 or gt35) bull Positive fetal fibronectin bull Hypertension bull BMI (underweight or overweight) bull Renal disease bull Anti-phospholipid syndrome bull Antenatal depression bull Genital tract infections bull Preterm rupture of membranes bull Antepartum haemorrhage bull Other
Socialstructural risk factors
bull Late care enrollmentinadequate prenatal care
bull Tobacco use
bull Maternal income
bull Maternal education
bull Maternal stress
bull Marital status
bull Unstable housing
bull Other
Clinical and social interventions to reduce
preterm birth Clinical interventions
bull Progesterone for women with a singleton
gestation and a history of spontaneous PTB
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a
singleton gestation and current short cervix in the second trimester
bull Consideration of cerclage for women with a
singleton gestation and a history of a prior
spontaneous PTB and a current short cervix particularly if the length is lt15 mm
bull Elimination of elective inductions before 39 weeks
bull Evidence-based management of other major
risk factors (eg preeclampsia
management pharmacotherapy to address heavy smoking)
bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Other
Socio-clinical interventions
More evidence
bull Group antenatal care
bull Some home visiting models
bull Psychosocial interventions to promote smoking cessation
bull Midwife-led continuity models
bull Nutrition counseling
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Other
Theory A Population Approach
1 To reduce rates of
preterm birth among
pregnant w omen
2 To improve health and
health care outcomes for pregnant w omen and
new borns
3 To decrease per capita
costs of care
Identify and engage
pregnant w omen at
high risk for preterm
birth and poor birth
outcomes
Provide evidence-
based population-
specif ic perinatal care
bull Evaluate clinical risk factors
bull Evaluate
socialstructural factors
bull Engage vulnerable pregnant women
bull Reliably deliver evidence-based
medical
interventions bull Implement socio-
clinical and community-based
interventions which
best address the risk factors for the local
population
Integrate community
resources to support
pregnant w omen
bull Partner with local
organizations working to serve this
population bull Identify resources to
build and grow care
models
Secondary Drivers Primary Drivers
Aim
Although this design session will focus on strategies to reduce preterm birth any population health system to Integrate Maternal health and Care will include the following components
bull Learning how to apply the emerging evidence to correctly identify when labor begins bull No routine non-medically indicated inductions bull No routine separation of mother and baby regardless if the birth occurs vaginally or by cesarean and bull Providing support to women and their family members through the postpartum and discharge period
Interventions
bull Home visiting models bull Peer support modelsGroup prenatal Care
bull Prenatal substance abuse programs (eg
for opiate addiction) bull Pregnancy Medical Home elements
bull Interventions to promote smoking cessation bull Nutrition counseling
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a singleton gestation and history of
spontaneous PTB or current short cervix in
the second trimester bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Use of LARCsother postpartum contraception
Bundle of Interventions
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Peer support (including group prenatal care)
bull Integration of substance use treatment and perinatal care
bull Shared decision making around pregnancy intention
Testing our theory lessons learned
bull Spectrum of pregnancy intention
bull Closing the disparity gap
bull Maternal outcomes
Next steps Prototype testing
bull Partnership with Detroit WIN Network and
HFHS
bull Co-design community intervention based on
interventions
bull 9-month prototype test
A Historical Reflection 1995-2016
1995 BTS Improving Maternal and
Neonatal Outcomes
bull Reducing Cesarean Section Rates
National Congress
Innovation (2003-2006) IMPACT (2006 ndash 2009) Perinatal Improvement
Community (2009 ndash 2014)
Expert Meeting (2003)
Developed idealized Design
Concept Diagram (2004)
Oxytocin Bundles Meeting
(2004)
Phase I Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2004)
Phase II Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2005)
Initial Change Package for OB (2006)
100000 Lives Campaign ndash
mentor netw ork (OB) (2006)
AIM Reduce birth trauma and risk by innovative design and testing by
February 2006
AIM Reduction of Harm Outcome Measure- Perinatal Adverse Events
AIM Reducing Harm Improving Care Supporting Health
IHI Perinatal Focused Work Timeline
White Paper (2006)
Launch Perinatal IMPACT Community (2006)
IHI Perinatal Web and Action (2006)
Catholic Healthcare West (2006)
Mayo System (2006)
Developed Building Blocks (2007)
Developed Initial Driver Diagram (2007)
Oxytocin High Alert Medication Deep Dive (2007)
Vacuum Bundle Developed (2008 )
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance
bull Wales 1000 Lives Campaign (2007)
bull Northern Ireland (2009)
IMPACT Ended (82009)
PIC initiated (92009)
International Teams joined Community (2009-2014)
Expedition Improving Perinatal Safety -- The Oxytocin Bundle (2010)
Faculty Team expanded PIC Hospital Members (2010)
Innovation Workgroup Second Stage Safety (2010)
Labor Deep Dive Tool (2010)
Revised Driver Diagram -Leadership (2010)
Advanced Bundles developed (2010)
Birth Outcomes Initiative - Louisiana (2010 -2012)
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance (Scotland amp
Denmark) (2011)
Faculty Team expanded Patient Representative (2011)
ACOG Toolkit (IHI oxytocin bundles) (2012)
IHI How to Guide Obstetrical Adverse Events (2012)
Obstetrical Sepsis Summit (2012)
NCC Uses Oxytocin Bundles for Certif ication (2012)
Deep Dive Structure Tool (2012)
IHI HEN HRET (Perinatal Content) (2012)
Louisiana Cohort (20132014)
Louisiana HEN merged w LA Cohort (2013)
Maternity Action Team (2013)
Retired Original Oxytocin Bundles ((2013)
Expedition Treating Maternal Sepsis (2013)
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
Late Preterm Infant (2013)
Innovation Neonatal Workgroup (2013)
Innovation Nulliparous Workgroup (2013)
CMS Louisiana Performance Improvement Grant (2013)
Maternity Action Playbook Leadership Driver amp Change
Package (2014)
Critical Incident Coaching (2014)
IHI Perinatal Community Care Bundle Sequencing
Elective Induction Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
Augmentation Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
IHI Oxytocin Bundles (2004)
bull GAgt39 weeks
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Category I-normal)
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Exclusion of Category III)
Basic Oxytocin Bundles Defined as patient who receives
Oxytocin for elective induction or augmentation Focus on
eliminating elective delivery prior to 39 weeks adoption
of team definition and reliable execution of component
indicators
IHI Advanced Bundles (2010) Accept 39 weeks as minimal GA for elective delivery Bishop score of more than 8 in the nulliparous patient the probability of vaginal delivery after labor induction is similar to spontaneous laborFocus moves to pharmacologic or mechanical initiation of labor- no longer focused on (just) Oxytocin Evidence Based Gestational dating is core
Additional Bundles developed and or
supported by faculty and Innovation
Workgroups
Advanced Non-Medically
Indicated Bundle
Advanced Indicated Induction Bundle
Advanced Augmentation Bundle
Vacuum Bundle (2008)
Defined Patient without a
medical indication for delivery
bull Confi rmation of term
gestation
bull Pelvic Assessment Favorable
Bishop Score (locally
defined)
bull Recognition and
management of
compl ications of induction
method (including
tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I-
normal)
Defined Patient with a medical
indication for induction
bull Acceptable medical indication for
labor induction documented
(locally defined)
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
compl ications of induction method
(including tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management of
FHR Status
Exclus ion of Category III FHR
Defined
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management
of tachysystole
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I -
normal)
bull (Exclusion of Category II I)
(May include amniotomy nipple
s timulation acupuncture and
Oxytocin)
bull Alternative labor s trategies
bull Prepared patient
bull High probability of success
bull Maximum application time and
number of pop-offs predetermined
bull Exit s trategy available
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
bull NRP appropriate (vigorous infant 37
-41+ w eeks gestation
bull Identif ication of risk of
infectionsepsis
bull Delayed cord clamping
bull Breastfeeding Initiation
bull Delayed bath- (for f irst hour of life
bull Align Unit Measures Strategies Projects w ith Org Strategy and Goals (Clinical
Patient Exp Financial and Workforce)
bull Channel Senior Leadership Attention and Develop Unit Leadership
bull Engage Physicians
bull Build Improvement Capacity and Provide Resources for Improvement bull Establish a Just Culture
bull Develop a Competent Trained and Available Workforce
bull Establish Credentialing of Core Competency and Training for all Providers
bull Use ACOGAWHONN Guidelines for Documentation and Staff ing
bull Develop a Consumer Advisory Board
Perinatal
Leadership
bull Execute care that meets national standards (Implement Bundles Perinatal Core
Processes)
bull Develop standard processes and protocols for response to obstetrical emergency
bull Design care process improvement based on trigger tool analysis event detection
sentinel event bull Standardize administration of high alert medications ndash oxytocin magnesium sulfate
epidurals
bull Create an environment that Supports Care and Healing
bull Consider segments of population and design reliable and appropriate processes for
specif ic needs and characteristics of this segment of the population
Reliable
Design Reduce Variation
bull Adopt common language and interpretation of EFM w ith multi-disciplinary training ie
NICHD criteria
bull Implement techniques for effective communication ie SBAR
bull Establish reliable techniques for handoffs
bull Establish Team Response Protocols bull Implement Huddles
bull Design Simulations
Effective
Peer Teamwork
bull Design processes to support partnership in care betw een provider and patient and
family
bull Develop w ith patient a customized interdisciplinary shared care plan
bull Design care process improvement based on information obtained about patient
experience (interviews assessments focus groups surveys) bull Include patients and families on design and improvement teams
bull Communicate openly and honestly w ith family and patients at regular intervals
bull Do w hat you say mean w hat you do
Respectful
Patient Partnership
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births
Zero incidence of
elective deliveries prior to confirmation
of fetal maturity
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or
Compliance greater than 90
Improve organizational
culture of safety survey scores in
Perinatal units by 25
100 of participating
teams will have documentation of Patient amp
Family Centered Care
Perinatal Community
Reducing Harm Improving Care
Supporting Healing
Reduce Harm Improve Care
Support Healing
Respectful Patient
Partnership
Reliable Design amp Reduce Variation
Effective
Peer Teamwork
Perinatal Leadership
Perinatal Improvement Community
Measurement Strategy
Collaborative Perinatal Goals
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births Zero incidence of elective deliveries prior to confirmation of fetal maturity (39 weeks)
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or Compliance great than 90 Improve organizational culture of safety survey scores in Perinatal units by 25
100 of the participating teams will have documentation of Patient amp Family Centered Care
Perinatal Care Measurement Strategy Required Measures Optional Measures
Annual Bi-annual
Structure Assessments
Monthly Outcome amp Structure
Measures
Initial Weekly or Monthly
Process Measures
Advanced Weekly or Monthly
Outcome and Process Measures
Outcome Balance or Process
Measures
Oxytocin Deep Dive
Perinatal Harm
Augmentation Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Vacuum Bundle CompositeCompliance
Transfer to Higher Level of Care (A) (B)
Time Between Elective Deliveries
39 wks
Elective Induction Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Augmentation
Bundle Composite Compliance
Patient and Family Satisfaction
Culture of Safety Survey
Documentation Reliability
(InfantMother)
Elective Delivery Rate prior to 39 completed weeks
gestation (TJC PC01 )
Augmentation Induction Monthly Bundle
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Elective Induction Bundle
Composite Compliance
Time Between (Decision - Incision)
Prophylactic Antibiotic in C-section
Labor Deep Dive
Cesarean rate for low-risk first birth women
(TJC PC02) Elective Induction Monthly Bundle Compliance
(Oxytocin)
Advanced Indicated Induction
Bundle Composite Compliance
Birth trauma rate measures (NQF)
Incidence of episiotomy (NQF)
Patient and Family Centered Care
Gestational Age Reliability (Test
Measure)
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Introductions
bull Sue Gullo
bull Annette Bartley
Session overview
bull Pregnancy and childbirth are a critical time in not only the
womanrsquos health but that of her family and new-born It is
however only a snapshot in the lifespan of a woman
bull This session will explore the impact the social determinants of
health have on health and will provide an overview of key safety
interventions to address key clinical obstetric and neonatal events
that impact health and outcomes
Session objectives
bull Describe the social determinants of health and the impact
on the health of women and newborns
bull Discuss key safety interventions to address adverse
pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in the United States
and other countries
bull Discuss how these interventions can be introduced
Public Health
bull Public health is a broad subject that arguably embraces all
aspects of our lives from the air we breathe the food we eat the
place we live in work and leisure as well as our genetic ethnic
and cultural heritage
bull All these factors contribute to overall health
bull In order to create the best possible outcomes for women and
babies we need to take the wider social determinants of health
into consideration as we design our healthcare service
bull Health promotion plays a key factor
World Heath Organisation
What are social determinants of health
bull The social determinants of health are the conditions in which
people are born grow live work and age These circumstances
are shaped by the distribution of money power and resources at
global national and local levels The social determinants of health
are mostly responsible for health inequities - the unfair and
avoidable differences in health status seen within and between
countries
Figure 1 The Health Map determinants of health and well-being
From Barton H and Grant M (2006) A health map for the local human habitat The Journal for the Royal Society for the Promotion of health 126(6) pp 252-253 ISSN 1466-4240
Lets begin with the bigger picture
Public health message- Dubai
lt The Public Health amp Safety
Department has initiated a public service campaign to warn children amp pregnant women from entering
cafes with creative messages hung on all the cafes doors in Dubai
The messages will be addressed by the fetus or children amp aimed towards the parents smoking is
your choice not mine
lt Door-sized posters publicising the campaign have been plastered on cafe entrances across the
emirates where people go to smoke the hookah pipes
IHIrsquos Innovation Work
AIM
To develop a population approach to reduce preterm births among Medicaid (women receiving
insurance through the government supported plan)
recipient women
Methods
bull Evidence scan
bull 50+ expert interviewssite visits across 20 states to
identify best practices
bull Expert design meeting
bull Validate theory of change and bundle of interventions
bull Prototype test bundle of interventions with one community
Risk factors for preterm birth
Clinical risk factors bull A previous history of pre-term birth bull Multiple gestation bull Short interval between pregnancies bull Cervical length measured during
pregnancy bull Age (lt16 or gt35) bull Positive fetal fibronectin bull Hypertension bull BMI (underweight or overweight) bull Renal disease bull Anti-phospholipid syndrome bull Antenatal depression bull Genital tract infections bull Preterm rupture of membranes bull Antepartum haemorrhage bull Other
Socialstructural risk factors
bull Late care enrollmentinadequate prenatal care
bull Tobacco use
bull Maternal income
bull Maternal education
bull Maternal stress
bull Marital status
bull Unstable housing
bull Other
Clinical and social interventions to reduce
preterm birth Clinical interventions
bull Progesterone for women with a singleton
gestation and a history of spontaneous PTB
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a
singleton gestation and current short cervix in the second trimester
bull Consideration of cerclage for women with a
singleton gestation and a history of a prior
spontaneous PTB and a current short cervix particularly if the length is lt15 mm
bull Elimination of elective inductions before 39 weeks
bull Evidence-based management of other major
risk factors (eg preeclampsia
management pharmacotherapy to address heavy smoking)
bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Other
Socio-clinical interventions
More evidence
bull Group antenatal care
bull Some home visiting models
bull Psychosocial interventions to promote smoking cessation
bull Midwife-led continuity models
bull Nutrition counseling
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Other
Theory A Population Approach
1 To reduce rates of
preterm birth among
pregnant w omen
2 To improve health and
health care outcomes for pregnant w omen and
new borns
3 To decrease per capita
costs of care
Identify and engage
pregnant w omen at
high risk for preterm
birth and poor birth
outcomes
Provide evidence-
based population-
specif ic perinatal care
bull Evaluate clinical risk factors
bull Evaluate
socialstructural factors
bull Engage vulnerable pregnant women
bull Reliably deliver evidence-based
medical
interventions bull Implement socio-
clinical and community-based
interventions which
best address the risk factors for the local
population
Integrate community
resources to support
pregnant w omen
bull Partner with local
organizations working to serve this
population bull Identify resources to
build and grow care
models
Secondary Drivers Primary Drivers
Aim
Although this design session will focus on strategies to reduce preterm birth any population health system to Integrate Maternal health and Care will include the following components
bull Learning how to apply the emerging evidence to correctly identify when labor begins bull No routine non-medically indicated inductions bull No routine separation of mother and baby regardless if the birth occurs vaginally or by cesarean and bull Providing support to women and their family members through the postpartum and discharge period
Interventions
bull Home visiting models bull Peer support modelsGroup prenatal Care
bull Prenatal substance abuse programs (eg
for opiate addiction) bull Pregnancy Medical Home elements
bull Interventions to promote smoking cessation bull Nutrition counseling
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a singleton gestation and history of
spontaneous PTB or current short cervix in
the second trimester bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Use of LARCsother postpartum contraception
Bundle of Interventions
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Peer support (including group prenatal care)
bull Integration of substance use treatment and perinatal care
bull Shared decision making around pregnancy intention
Testing our theory lessons learned
bull Spectrum of pregnancy intention
bull Closing the disparity gap
bull Maternal outcomes
Next steps Prototype testing
bull Partnership with Detroit WIN Network and
HFHS
bull Co-design community intervention based on
interventions
bull 9-month prototype test
A Historical Reflection 1995-2016
1995 BTS Improving Maternal and
Neonatal Outcomes
bull Reducing Cesarean Section Rates
National Congress
Innovation (2003-2006) IMPACT (2006 ndash 2009) Perinatal Improvement
Community (2009 ndash 2014)
Expert Meeting (2003)
Developed idealized Design
Concept Diagram (2004)
Oxytocin Bundles Meeting
(2004)
Phase I Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2004)
Phase II Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2005)
Initial Change Package for OB (2006)
100000 Lives Campaign ndash
mentor netw ork (OB) (2006)
AIM Reduce birth trauma and risk by innovative design and testing by
February 2006
AIM Reduction of Harm Outcome Measure- Perinatal Adverse Events
AIM Reducing Harm Improving Care Supporting Health
IHI Perinatal Focused Work Timeline
White Paper (2006)
Launch Perinatal IMPACT Community (2006)
IHI Perinatal Web and Action (2006)
Catholic Healthcare West (2006)
Mayo System (2006)
Developed Building Blocks (2007)
Developed Initial Driver Diagram (2007)
Oxytocin High Alert Medication Deep Dive (2007)
Vacuum Bundle Developed (2008 )
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance
bull Wales 1000 Lives Campaign (2007)
bull Northern Ireland (2009)
IMPACT Ended (82009)
PIC initiated (92009)
International Teams joined Community (2009-2014)
Expedition Improving Perinatal Safety -- The Oxytocin Bundle (2010)
Faculty Team expanded PIC Hospital Members (2010)
Innovation Workgroup Second Stage Safety (2010)
Labor Deep Dive Tool (2010)
Revised Driver Diagram -Leadership (2010)
Advanced Bundles developed (2010)
Birth Outcomes Initiative - Louisiana (2010 -2012)
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance (Scotland amp
Denmark) (2011)
Faculty Team expanded Patient Representative (2011)
ACOG Toolkit (IHI oxytocin bundles) (2012)
IHI How to Guide Obstetrical Adverse Events (2012)
Obstetrical Sepsis Summit (2012)
NCC Uses Oxytocin Bundles for Certif ication (2012)
Deep Dive Structure Tool (2012)
IHI HEN HRET (Perinatal Content) (2012)
Louisiana Cohort (20132014)
Louisiana HEN merged w LA Cohort (2013)
Maternity Action Team (2013)
Retired Original Oxytocin Bundles ((2013)
Expedition Treating Maternal Sepsis (2013)
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
Late Preterm Infant (2013)
Innovation Neonatal Workgroup (2013)
Innovation Nulliparous Workgroup (2013)
CMS Louisiana Performance Improvement Grant (2013)
Maternity Action Playbook Leadership Driver amp Change
Package (2014)
Critical Incident Coaching (2014)
IHI Perinatal Community Care Bundle Sequencing
Elective Induction Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
Augmentation Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
IHI Oxytocin Bundles (2004)
bull GAgt39 weeks
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Category I-normal)
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Exclusion of Category III)
Basic Oxytocin Bundles Defined as patient who receives
Oxytocin for elective induction or augmentation Focus on
eliminating elective delivery prior to 39 weeks adoption
of team definition and reliable execution of component
indicators
IHI Advanced Bundles (2010) Accept 39 weeks as minimal GA for elective delivery Bishop score of more than 8 in the nulliparous patient the probability of vaginal delivery after labor induction is similar to spontaneous laborFocus moves to pharmacologic or mechanical initiation of labor- no longer focused on (just) Oxytocin Evidence Based Gestational dating is core
Additional Bundles developed and or
supported by faculty and Innovation
Workgroups
Advanced Non-Medically
Indicated Bundle
Advanced Indicated Induction Bundle
Advanced Augmentation Bundle
Vacuum Bundle (2008)
Defined Patient without a
medical indication for delivery
bull Confi rmation of term
gestation
bull Pelvic Assessment Favorable
Bishop Score (locally
defined)
bull Recognition and
management of
compl ications of induction
method (including
tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I-
normal)
Defined Patient with a medical
indication for induction
bull Acceptable medical indication for
labor induction documented
(locally defined)
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
compl ications of induction method
(including tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management of
FHR Status
Exclus ion of Category III FHR
Defined
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management
of tachysystole
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I -
normal)
bull (Exclusion of Category II I)
(May include amniotomy nipple
s timulation acupuncture and
Oxytocin)
bull Alternative labor s trategies
bull Prepared patient
bull High probability of success
bull Maximum application time and
number of pop-offs predetermined
bull Exit s trategy available
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
bull NRP appropriate (vigorous infant 37
-41+ w eeks gestation
bull Identif ication of risk of
infectionsepsis
bull Delayed cord clamping
bull Breastfeeding Initiation
bull Delayed bath- (for f irst hour of life
bull Align Unit Measures Strategies Projects w ith Org Strategy and Goals (Clinical
Patient Exp Financial and Workforce)
bull Channel Senior Leadership Attention and Develop Unit Leadership
bull Engage Physicians
bull Build Improvement Capacity and Provide Resources for Improvement bull Establish a Just Culture
bull Develop a Competent Trained and Available Workforce
bull Establish Credentialing of Core Competency and Training for all Providers
bull Use ACOGAWHONN Guidelines for Documentation and Staff ing
bull Develop a Consumer Advisory Board
Perinatal
Leadership
bull Execute care that meets national standards (Implement Bundles Perinatal Core
Processes)
bull Develop standard processes and protocols for response to obstetrical emergency
bull Design care process improvement based on trigger tool analysis event detection
sentinel event bull Standardize administration of high alert medications ndash oxytocin magnesium sulfate
epidurals
bull Create an environment that Supports Care and Healing
bull Consider segments of population and design reliable and appropriate processes for
specif ic needs and characteristics of this segment of the population
Reliable
Design Reduce Variation
bull Adopt common language and interpretation of EFM w ith multi-disciplinary training ie
NICHD criteria
bull Implement techniques for effective communication ie SBAR
bull Establish reliable techniques for handoffs
bull Establish Team Response Protocols bull Implement Huddles
bull Design Simulations
Effective
Peer Teamwork
bull Design processes to support partnership in care betw een provider and patient and
family
bull Develop w ith patient a customized interdisciplinary shared care plan
bull Design care process improvement based on information obtained about patient
experience (interviews assessments focus groups surveys) bull Include patients and families on design and improvement teams
bull Communicate openly and honestly w ith family and patients at regular intervals
bull Do w hat you say mean w hat you do
Respectful
Patient Partnership
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births
Zero incidence of
elective deliveries prior to confirmation
of fetal maturity
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or
Compliance greater than 90
Improve organizational
culture of safety survey scores in
Perinatal units by 25
100 of participating
teams will have documentation of Patient amp
Family Centered Care
Perinatal Community
Reducing Harm Improving Care
Supporting Healing
Reduce Harm Improve Care
Support Healing
Respectful Patient
Partnership
Reliable Design amp Reduce Variation
Effective
Peer Teamwork
Perinatal Leadership
Perinatal Improvement Community
Measurement Strategy
Collaborative Perinatal Goals
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births Zero incidence of elective deliveries prior to confirmation of fetal maturity (39 weeks)
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or Compliance great than 90 Improve organizational culture of safety survey scores in Perinatal units by 25
100 of the participating teams will have documentation of Patient amp Family Centered Care
Perinatal Care Measurement Strategy Required Measures Optional Measures
Annual Bi-annual
Structure Assessments
Monthly Outcome amp Structure
Measures
Initial Weekly or Monthly
Process Measures
Advanced Weekly or Monthly
Outcome and Process Measures
Outcome Balance or Process
Measures
Oxytocin Deep Dive
Perinatal Harm
Augmentation Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Vacuum Bundle CompositeCompliance
Transfer to Higher Level of Care (A) (B)
Time Between Elective Deliveries
39 wks
Elective Induction Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Augmentation
Bundle Composite Compliance
Patient and Family Satisfaction
Culture of Safety Survey
Documentation Reliability
(InfantMother)
Elective Delivery Rate prior to 39 completed weeks
gestation (TJC PC01 )
Augmentation Induction Monthly Bundle
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Elective Induction Bundle
Composite Compliance
Time Between (Decision - Incision)
Prophylactic Antibiotic in C-section
Labor Deep Dive
Cesarean rate for low-risk first birth women
(TJC PC02) Elective Induction Monthly Bundle Compliance
(Oxytocin)
Advanced Indicated Induction
Bundle Composite Compliance
Birth trauma rate measures (NQF)
Incidence of episiotomy (NQF)
Patient and Family Centered Care
Gestational Age Reliability (Test
Measure)
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Session overview
bull Pregnancy and childbirth are a critical time in not only the
womanrsquos health but that of her family and new-born It is
however only a snapshot in the lifespan of a woman
bull This session will explore the impact the social determinants of
health have on health and will provide an overview of key safety
interventions to address key clinical obstetric and neonatal events
that impact health and outcomes
Session objectives
bull Describe the social determinants of health and the impact
on the health of women and newborns
bull Discuss key safety interventions to address adverse
pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in the United States
and other countries
bull Discuss how these interventions can be introduced
Public Health
bull Public health is a broad subject that arguably embraces all
aspects of our lives from the air we breathe the food we eat the
place we live in work and leisure as well as our genetic ethnic
and cultural heritage
bull All these factors contribute to overall health
bull In order to create the best possible outcomes for women and
babies we need to take the wider social determinants of health
into consideration as we design our healthcare service
bull Health promotion plays a key factor
World Heath Organisation
What are social determinants of health
bull The social determinants of health are the conditions in which
people are born grow live work and age These circumstances
are shaped by the distribution of money power and resources at
global national and local levels The social determinants of health
are mostly responsible for health inequities - the unfair and
avoidable differences in health status seen within and between
countries
Figure 1 The Health Map determinants of health and well-being
From Barton H and Grant M (2006) A health map for the local human habitat The Journal for the Royal Society for the Promotion of health 126(6) pp 252-253 ISSN 1466-4240
Lets begin with the bigger picture
Public health message- Dubai
lt The Public Health amp Safety
Department has initiated a public service campaign to warn children amp pregnant women from entering
cafes with creative messages hung on all the cafes doors in Dubai
The messages will be addressed by the fetus or children amp aimed towards the parents smoking is
your choice not mine
lt Door-sized posters publicising the campaign have been plastered on cafe entrances across the
emirates where people go to smoke the hookah pipes
IHIrsquos Innovation Work
AIM
To develop a population approach to reduce preterm births among Medicaid (women receiving
insurance through the government supported plan)
recipient women
Methods
bull Evidence scan
bull 50+ expert interviewssite visits across 20 states to
identify best practices
bull Expert design meeting
bull Validate theory of change and bundle of interventions
bull Prototype test bundle of interventions with one community
Risk factors for preterm birth
Clinical risk factors bull A previous history of pre-term birth bull Multiple gestation bull Short interval between pregnancies bull Cervical length measured during
pregnancy bull Age (lt16 or gt35) bull Positive fetal fibronectin bull Hypertension bull BMI (underweight or overweight) bull Renal disease bull Anti-phospholipid syndrome bull Antenatal depression bull Genital tract infections bull Preterm rupture of membranes bull Antepartum haemorrhage bull Other
Socialstructural risk factors
bull Late care enrollmentinadequate prenatal care
bull Tobacco use
bull Maternal income
bull Maternal education
bull Maternal stress
bull Marital status
bull Unstable housing
bull Other
Clinical and social interventions to reduce
preterm birth Clinical interventions
bull Progesterone for women with a singleton
gestation and a history of spontaneous PTB
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a
singleton gestation and current short cervix in the second trimester
bull Consideration of cerclage for women with a
singleton gestation and a history of a prior
spontaneous PTB and a current short cervix particularly if the length is lt15 mm
bull Elimination of elective inductions before 39 weeks
bull Evidence-based management of other major
risk factors (eg preeclampsia
management pharmacotherapy to address heavy smoking)
bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Other
Socio-clinical interventions
More evidence
bull Group antenatal care
bull Some home visiting models
bull Psychosocial interventions to promote smoking cessation
bull Midwife-led continuity models
bull Nutrition counseling
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Other
Theory A Population Approach
1 To reduce rates of
preterm birth among
pregnant w omen
2 To improve health and
health care outcomes for pregnant w omen and
new borns
3 To decrease per capita
costs of care
Identify and engage
pregnant w omen at
high risk for preterm
birth and poor birth
outcomes
Provide evidence-
based population-
specif ic perinatal care
bull Evaluate clinical risk factors
bull Evaluate
socialstructural factors
bull Engage vulnerable pregnant women
bull Reliably deliver evidence-based
medical
interventions bull Implement socio-
clinical and community-based
interventions which
best address the risk factors for the local
population
Integrate community
resources to support
pregnant w omen
bull Partner with local
organizations working to serve this
population bull Identify resources to
build and grow care
models
Secondary Drivers Primary Drivers
Aim
Although this design session will focus on strategies to reduce preterm birth any population health system to Integrate Maternal health and Care will include the following components
bull Learning how to apply the emerging evidence to correctly identify when labor begins bull No routine non-medically indicated inductions bull No routine separation of mother and baby regardless if the birth occurs vaginally or by cesarean and bull Providing support to women and their family members through the postpartum and discharge period
Interventions
bull Home visiting models bull Peer support modelsGroup prenatal Care
bull Prenatal substance abuse programs (eg
for opiate addiction) bull Pregnancy Medical Home elements
bull Interventions to promote smoking cessation bull Nutrition counseling
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a singleton gestation and history of
spontaneous PTB or current short cervix in
the second trimester bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Use of LARCsother postpartum contraception
Bundle of Interventions
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Peer support (including group prenatal care)
bull Integration of substance use treatment and perinatal care
bull Shared decision making around pregnancy intention
Testing our theory lessons learned
bull Spectrum of pregnancy intention
bull Closing the disparity gap
bull Maternal outcomes
Next steps Prototype testing
bull Partnership with Detroit WIN Network and
HFHS
bull Co-design community intervention based on
interventions
bull 9-month prototype test
A Historical Reflection 1995-2016
1995 BTS Improving Maternal and
Neonatal Outcomes
bull Reducing Cesarean Section Rates
National Congress
Innovation (2003-2006) IMPACT (2006 ndash 2009) Perinatal Improvement
Community (2009 ndash 2014)
Expert Meeting (2003)
Developed idealized Design
Concept Diagram (2004)
Oxytocin Bundles Meeting
(2004)
Phase I Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2004)
Phase II Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2005)
Initial Change Package for OB (2006)
100000 Lives Campaign ndash
mentor netw ork (OB) (2006)
AIM Reduce birth trauma and risk by innovative design and testing by
February 2006
AIM Reduction of Harm Outcome Measure- Perinatal Adverse Events
AIM Reducing Harm Improving Care Supporting Health
IHI Perinatal Focused Work Timeline
White Paper (2006)
Launch Perinatal IMPACT Community (2006)
IHI Perinatal Web and Action (2006)
Catholic Healthcare West (2006)
Mayo System (2006)
Developed Building Blocks (2007)
Developed Initial Driver Diagram (2007)
Oxytocin High Alert Medication Deep Dive (2007)
Vacuum Bundle Developed (2008 )
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance
bull Wales 1000 Lives Campaign (2007)
bull Northern Ireland (2009)
IMPACT Ended (82009)
PIC initiated (92009)
International Teams joined Community (2009-2014)
Expedition Improving Perinatal Safety -- The Oxytocin Bundle (2010)
Faculty Team expanded PIC Hospital Members (2010)
Innovation Workgroup Second Stage Safety (2010)
Labor Deep Dive Tool (2010)
Revised Driver Diagram -Leadership (2010)
Advanced Bundles developed (2010)
Birth Outcomes Initiative - Louisiana (2010 -2012)
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance (Scotland amp
Denmark) (2011)
Faculty Team expanded Patient Representative (2011)
ACOG Toolkit (IHI oxytocin bundles) (2012)
IHI How to Guide Obstetrical Adverse Events (2012)
Obstetrical Sepsis Summit (2012)
NCC Uses Oxytocin Bundles for Certif ication (2012)
Deep Dive Structure Tool (2012)
IHI HEN HRET (Perinatal Content) (2012)
Louisiana Cohort (20132014)
Louisiana HEN merged w LA Cohort (2013)
Maternity Action Team (2013)
Retired Original Oxytocin Bundles ((2013)
Expedition Treating Maternal Sepsis (2013)
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
Late Preterm Infant (2013)
Innovation Neonatal Workgroup (2013)
Innovation Nulliparous Workgroup (2013)
CMS Louisiana Performance Improvement Grant (2013)
Maternity Action Playbook Leadership Driver amp Change
Package (2014)
Critical Incident Coaching (2014)
IHI Perinatal Community Care Bundle Sequencing
Elective Induction Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
Augmentation Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
IHI Oxytocin Bundles (2004)
bull GAgt39 weeks
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Category I-normal)
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Exclusion of Category III)
Basic Oxytocin Bundles Defined as patient who receives
Oxytocin for elective induction or augmentation Focus on
eliminating elective delivery prior to 39 weeks adoption
of team definition and reliable execution of component
indicators
IHI Advanced Bundles (2010) Accept 39 weeks as minimal GA for elective delivery Bishop score of more than 8 in the nulliparous patient the probability of vaginal delivery after labor induction is similar to spontaneous laborFocus moves to pharmacologic or mechanical initiation of labor- no longer focused on (just) Oxytocin Evidence Based Gestational dating is core
Additional Bundles developed and or
supported by faculty and Innovation
Workgroups
Advanced Non-Medically
Indicated Bundle
Advanced Indicated Induction Bundle
Advanced Augmentation Bundle
Vacuum Bundle (2008)
Defined Patient without a
medical indication for delivery
bull Confi rmation of term
gestation
bull Pelvic Assessment Favorable
Bishop Score (locally
defined)
bull Recognition and
management of
compl ications of induction
method (including
tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I-
normal)
Defined Patient with a medical
indication for induction
bull Acceptable medical indication for
labor induction documented
(locally defined)
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
compl ications of induction method
(including tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management of
FHR Status
Exclus ion of Category III FHR
Defined
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management
of tachysystole
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I -
normal)
bull (Exclusion of Category II I)
(May include amniotomy nipple
s timulation acupuncture and
Oxytocin)
bull Alternative labor s trategies
bull Prepared patient
bull High probability of success
bull Maximum application time and
number of pop-offs predetermined
bull Exit s trategy available
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
bull NRP appropriate (vigorous infant 37
-41+ w eeks gestation
bull Identif ication of risk of
infectionsepsis
bull Delayed cord clamping
bull Breastfeeding Initiation
bull Delayed bath- (for f irst hour of life
bull Align Unit Measures Strategies Projects w ith Org Strategy and Goals (Clinical
Patient Exp Financial and Workforce)
bull Channel Senior Leadership Attention and Develop Unit Leadership
bull Engage Physicians
bull Build Improvement Capacity and Provide Resources for Improvement bull Establish a Just Culture
bull Develop a Competent Trained and Available Workforce
bull Establish Credentialing of Core Competency and Training for all Providers
bull Use ACOGAWHONN Guidelines for Documentation and Staff ing
bull Develop a Consumer Advisory Board
Perinatal
Leadership
bull Execute care that meets national standards (Implement Bundles Perinatal Core
Processes)
bull Develop standard processes and protocols for response to obstetrical emergency
bull Design care process improvement based on trigger tool analysis event detection
sentinel event bull Standardize administration of high alert medications ndash oxytocin magnesium sulfate
epidurals
bull Create an environment that Supports Care and Healing
bull Consider segments of population and design reliable and appropriate processes for
specif ic needs and characteristics of this segment of the population
Reliable
Design Reduce Variation
bull Adopt common language and interpretation of EFM w ith multi-disciplinary training ie
NICHD criteria
bull Implement techniques for effective communication ie SBAR
bull Establish reliable techniques for handoffs
bull Establish Team Response Protocols bull Implement Huddles
bull Design Simulations
Effective
Peer Teamwork
bull Design processes to support partnership in care betw een provider and patient and
family
bull Develop w ith patient a customized interdisciplinary shared care plan
bull Design care process improvement based on information obtained about patient
experience (interviews assessments focus groups surveys) bull Include patients and families on design and improvement teams
bull Communicate openly and honestly w ith family and patients at regular intervals
bull Do w hat you say mean w hat you do
Respectful
Patient Partnership
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births
Zero incidence of
elective deliveries prior to confirmation
of fetal maturity
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or
Compliance greater than 90
Improve organizational
culture of safety survey scores in
Perinatal units by 25
100 of participating
teams will have documentation of Patient amp
Family Centered Care
Perinatal Community
Reducing Harm Improving Care
Supporting Healing
Reduce Harm Improve Care
Support Healing
Respectful Patient
Partnership
Reliable Design amp Reduce Variation
Effective
Peer Teamwork
Perinatal Leadership
Perinatal Improvement Community
Measurement Strategy
Collaborative Perinatal Goals
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births Zero incidence of elective deliveries prior to confirmation of fetal maturity (39 weeks)
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or Compliance great than 90 Improve organizational culture of safety survey scores in Perinatal units by 25
100 of the participating teams will have documentation of Patient amp Family Centered Care
Perinatal Care Measurement Strategy Required Measures Optional Measures
Annual Bi-annual
Structure Assessments
Monthly Outcome amp Structure
Measures
Initial Weekly or Monthly
Process Measures
Advanced Weekly or Monthly
Outcome and Process Measures
Outcome Balance or Process
Measures
Oxytocin Deep Dive
Perinatal Harm
Augmentation Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Vacuum Bundle CompositeCompliance
Transfer to Higher Level of Care (A) (B)
Time Between Elective Deliveries
39 wks
Elective Induction Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Augmentation
Bundle Composite Compliance
Patient and Family Satisfaction
Culture of Safety Survey
Documentation Reliability
(InfantMother)
Elective Delivery Rate prior to 39 completed weeks
gestation (TJC PC01 )
Augmentation Induction Monthly Bundle
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Elective Induction Bundle
Composite Compliance
Time Between (Decision - Incision)
Prophylactic Antibiotic in C-section
Labor Deep Dive
Cesarean rate for low-risk first birth women
(TJC PC02) Elective Induction Monthly Bundle Compliance
(Oxytocin)
Advanced Indicated Induction
Bundle Composite Compliance
Birth trauma rate measures (NQF)
Incidence of episiotomy (NQF)
Patient and Family Centered Care
Gestational Age Reliability (Test
Measure)
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Session objectives
bull Describe the social determinants of health and the impact
on the health of women and newborns
bull Discuss key safety interventions to address adverse
pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in the United States
and other countries
bull Discuss how these interventions can be introduced
Public Health
bull Public health is a broad subject that arguably embraces all
aspects of our lives from the air we breathe the food we eat the
place we live in work and leisure as well as our genetic ethnic
and cultural heritage
bull All these factors contribute to overall health
bull In order to create the best possible outcomes for women and
babies we need to take the wider social determinants of health
into consideration as we design our healthcare service
bull Health promotion plays a key factor
World Heath Organisation
What are social determinants of health
bull The social determinants of health are the conditions in which
people are born grow live work and age These circumstances
are shaped by the distribution of money power and resources at
global national and local levels The social determinants of health
are mostly responsible for health inequities - the unfair and
avoidable differences in health status seen within and between
countries
Figure 1 The Health Map determinants of health and well-being
From Barton H and Grant M (2006) A health map for the local human habitat The Journal for the Royal Society for the Promotion of health 126(6) pp 252-253 ISSN 1466-4240
Lets begin with the bigger picture
Public health message- Dubai
lt The Public Health amp Safety
Department has initiated a public service campaign to warn children amp pregnant women from entering
cafes with creative messages hung on all the cafes doors in Dubai
The messages will be addressed by the fetus or children amp aimed towards the parents smoking is
your choice not mine
lt Door-sized posters publicising the campaign have been plastered on cafe entrances across the
emirates where people go to smoke the hookah pipes
IHIrsquos Innovation Work
AIM
To develop a population approach to reduce preterm births among Medicaid (women receiving
insurance through the government supported plan)
recipient women
Methods
bull Evidence scan
bull 50+ expert interviewssite visits across 20 states to
identify best practices
bull Expert design meeting
bull Validate theory of change and bundle of interventions
bull Prototype test bundle of interventions with one community
Risk factors for preterm birth
Clinical risk factors bull A previous history of pre-term birth bull Multiple gestation bull Short interval between pregnancies bull Cervical length measured during
pregnancy bull Age (lt16 or gt35) bull Positive fetal fibronectin bull Hypertension bull BMI (underweight or overweight) bull Renal disease bull Anti-phospholipid syndrome bull Antenatal depression bull Genital tract infections bull Preterm rupture of membranes bull Antepartum haemorrhage bull Other
Socialstructural risk factors
bull Late care enrollmentinadequate prenatal care
bull Tobacco use
bull Maternal income
bull Maternal education
bull Maternal stress
bull Marital status
bull Unstable housing
bull Other
Clinical and social interventions to reduce
preterm birth Clinical interventions
bull Progesterone for women with a singleton
gestation and a history of spontaneous PTB
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a
singleton gestation and current short cervix in the second trimester
bull Consideration of cerclage for women with a
singleton gestation and a history of a prior
spontaneous PTB and a current short cervix particularly if the length is lt15 mm
bull Elimination of elective inductions before 39 weeks
bull Evidence-based management of other major
risk factors (eg preeclampsia
management pharmacotherapy to address heavy smoking)
bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Other
Socio-clinical interventions
More evidence
bull Group antenatal care
bull Some home visiting models
bull Psychosocial interventions to promote smoking cessation
bull Midwife-led continuity models
bull Nutrition counseling
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Other
Theory A Population Approach
1 To reduce rates of
preterm birth among
pregnant w omen
2 To improve health and
health care outcomes for pregnant w omen and
new borns
3 To decrease per capita
costs of care
Identify and engage
pregnant w omen at
high risk for preterm
birth and poor birth
outcomes
Provide evidence-
based population-
specif ic perinatal care
bull Evaluate clinical risk factors
bull Evaluate
socialstructural factors
bull Engage vulnerable pregnant women
bull Reliably deliver evidence-based
medical
interventions bull Implement socio-
clinical and community-based
interventions which
best address the risk factors for the local
population
Integrate community
resources to support
pregnant w omen
bull Partner with local
organizations working to serve this
population bull Identify resources to
build and grow care
models
Secondary Drivers Primary Drivers
Aim
Although this design session will focus on strategies to reduce preterm birth any population health system to Integrate Maternal health and Care will include the following components
bull Learning how to apply the emerging evidence to correctly identify when labor begins bull No routine non-medically indicated inductions bull No routine separation of mother and baby regardless if the birth occurs vaginally or by cesarean and bull Providing support to women and their family members through the postpartum and discharge period
Interventions
bull Home visiting models bull Peer support modelsGroup prenatal Care
bull Prenatal substance abuse programs (eg
for opiate addiction) bull Pregnancy Medical Home elements
bull Interventions to promote smoking cessation bull Nutrition counseling
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a singleton gestation and history of
spontaneous PTB or current short cervix in
the second trimester bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Use of LARCsother postpartum contraception
Bundle of Interventions
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Peer support (including group prenatal care)
bull Integration of substance use treatment and perinatal care
bull Shared decision making around pregnancy intention
Testing our theory lessons learned
bull Spectrum of pregnancy intention
bull Closing the disparity gap
bull Maternal outcomes
Next steps Prototype testing
bull Partnership with Detroit WIN Network and
HFHS
bull Co-design community intervention based on
interventions
bull 9-month prototype test
A Historical Reflection 1995-2016
1995 BTS Improving Maternal and
Neonatal Outcomes
bull Reducing Cesarean Section Rates
National Congress
Innovation (2003-2006) IMPACT (2006 ndash 2009) Perinatal Improvement
Community (2009 ndash 2014)
Expert Meeting (2003)
Developed idealized Design
Concept Diagram (2004)
Oxytocin Bundles Meeting
(2004)
Phase I Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2004)
Phase II Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2005)
Initial Change Package for OB (2006)
100000 Lives Campaign ndash
mentor netw ork (OB) (2006)
AIM Reduce birth trauma and risk by innovative design and testing by
February 2006
AIM Reduction of Harm Outcome Measure- Perinatal Adverse Events
AIM Reducing Harm Improving Care Supporting Health
IHI Perinatal Focused Work Timeline
White Paper (2006)
Launch Perinatal IMPACT Community (2006)
IHI Perinatal Web and Action (2006)
Catholic Healthcare West (2006)
Mayo System (2006)
Developed Building Blocks (2007)
Developed Initial Driver Diagram (2007)
Oxytocin High Alert Medication Deep Dive (2007)
Vacuum Bundle Developed (2008 )
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance
bull Wales 1000 Lives Campaign (2007)
bull Northern Ireland (2009)
IMPACT Ended (82009)
PIC initiated (92009)
International Teams joined Community (2009-2014)
Expedition Improving Perinatal Safety -- The Oxytocin Bundle (2010)
Faculty Team expanded PIC Hospital Members (2010)
Innovation Workgroup Second Stage Safety (2010)
Labor Deep Dive Tool (2010)
Revised Driver Diagram -Leadership (2010)
Advanced Bundles developed (2010)
Birth Outcomes Initiative - Louisiana (2010 -2012)
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance (Scotland amp
Denmark) (2011)
Faculty Team expanded Patient Representative (2011)
ACOG Toolkit (IHI oxytocin bundles) (2012)
IHI How to Guide Obstetrical Adverse Events (2012)
Obstetrical Sepsis Summit (2012)
NCC Uses Oxytocin Bundles for Certif ication (2012)
Deep Dive Structure Tool (2012)
IHI HEN HRET (Perinatal Content) (2012)
Louisiana Cohort (20132014)
Louisiana HEN merged w LA Cohort (2013)
Maternity Action Team (2013)
Retired Original Oxytocin Bundles ((2013)
Expedition Treating Maternal Sepsis (2013)
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
Late Preterm Infant (2013)
Innovation Neonatal Workgroup (2013)
Innovation Nulliparous Workgroup (2013)
CMS Louisiana Performance Improvement Grant (2013)
Maternity Action Playbook Leadership Driver amp Change
Package (2014)
Critical Incident Coaching (2014)
IHI Perinatal Community Care Bundle Sequencing
Elective Induction Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
Augmentation Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
IHI Oxytocin Bundles (2004)
bull GAgt39 weeks
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Category I-normal)
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Exclusion of Category III)
Basic Oxytocin Bundles Defined as patient who receives
Oxytocin for elective induction or augmentation Focus on
eliminating elective delivery prior to 39 weeks adoption
of team definition and reliable execution of component
indicators
IHI Advanced Bundles (2010) Accept 39 weeks as minimal GA for elective delivery Bishop score of more than 8 in the nulliparous patient the probability of vaginal delivery after labor induction is similar to spontaneous laborFocus moves to pharmacologic or mechanical initiation of labor- no longer focused on (just) Oxytocin Evidence Based Gestational dating is core
Additional Bundles developed and or
supported by faculty and Innovation
Workgroups
Advanced Non-Medically
Indicated Bundle
Advanced Indicated Induction Bundle
Advanced Augmentation Bundle
Vacuum Bundle (2008)
Defined Patient without a
medical indication for delivery
bull Confi rmation of term
gestation
bull Pelvic Assessment Favorable
Bishop Score (locally
defined)
bull Recognition and
management of
compl ications of induction
method (including
tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I-
normal)
Defined Patient with a medical
indication for induction
bull Acceptable medical indication for
labor induction documented
(locally defined)
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
compl ications of induction method
(including tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management of
FHR Status
Exclus ion of Category III FHR
Defined
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management
of tachysystole
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I -
normal)
bull (Exclusion of Category II I)
(May include amniotomy nipple
s timulation acupuncture and
Oxytocin)
bull Alternative labor s trategies
bull Prepared patient
bull High probability of success
bull Maximum application time and
number of pop-offs predetermined
bull Exit s trategy available
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
bull NRP appropriate (vigorous infant 37
-41+ w eeks gestation
bull Identif ication of risk of
infectionsepsis
bull Delayed cord clamping
bull Breastfeeding Initiation
bull Delayed bath- (for f irst hour of life
bull Align Unit Measures Strategies Projects w ith Org Strategy and Goals (Clinical
Patient Exp Financial and Workforce)
bull Channel Senior Leadership Attention and Develop Unit Leadership
bull Engage Physicians
bull Build Improvement Capacity and Provide Resources for Improvement bull Establish a Just Culture
bull Develop a Competent Trained and Available Workforce
bull Establish Credentialing of Core Competency and Training for all Providers
bull Use ACOGAWHONN Guidelines for Documentation and Staff ing
bull Develop a Consumer Advisory Board
Perinatal
Leadership
bull Execute care that meets national standards (Implement Bundles Perinatal Core
Processes)
bull Develop standard processes and protocols for response to obstetrical emergency
bull Design care process improvement based on trigger tool analysis event detection
sentinel event bull Standardize administration of high alert medications ndash oxytocin magnesium sulfate
epidurals
bull Create an environment that Supports Care and Healing
bull Consider segments of population and design reliable and appropriate processes for
specif ic needs and characteristics of this segment of the population
Reliable
Design Reduce Variation
bull Adopt common language and interpretation of EFM w ith multi-disciplinary training ie
NICHD criteria
bull Implement techniques for effective communication ie SBAR
bull Establish reliable techniques for handoffs
bull Establish Team Response Protocols bull Implement Huddles
bull Design Simulations
Effective
Peer Teamwork
bull Design processes to support partnership in care betw een provider and patient and
family
bull Develop w ith patient a customized interdisciplinary shared care plan
bull Design care process improvement based on information obtained about patient
experience (interviews assessments focus groups surveys) bull Include patients and families on design and improvement teams
bull Communicate openly and honestly w ith family and patients at regular intervals
bull Do w hat you say mean w hat you do
Respectful
Patient Partnership
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births
Zero incidence of
elective deliveries prior to confirmation
of fetal maturity
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or
Compliance greater than 90
Improve organizational
culture of safety survey scores in
Perinatal units by 25
100 of participating
teams will have documentation of Patient amp
Family Centered Care
Perinatal Community
Reducing Harm Improving Care
Supporting Healing
Reduce Harm Improve Care
Support Healing
Respectful Patient
Partnership
Reliable Design amp Reduce Variation
Effective
Peer Teamwork
Perinatal Leadership
Perinatal Improvement Community
Measurement Strategy
Collaborative Perinatal Goals
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births Zero incidence of elective deliveries prior to confirmation of fetal maturity (39 weeks)
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or Compliance great than 90 Improve organizational culture of safety survey scores in Perinatal units by 25
100 of the participating teams will have documentation of Patient amp Family Centered Care
Perinatal Care Measurement Strategy Required Measures Optional Measures
Annual Bi-annual
Structure Assessments
Monthly Outcome amp Structure
Measures
Initial Weekly or Monthly
Process Measures
Advanced Weekly or Monthly
Outcome and Process Measures
Outcome Balance or Process
Measures
Oxytocin Deep Dive
Perinatal Harm
Augmentation Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Vacuum Bundle CompositeCompliance
Transfer to Higher Level of Care (A) (B)
Time Between Elective Deliveries
39 wks
Elective Induction Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Augmentation
Bundle Composite Compliance
Patient and Family Satisfaction
Culture of Safety Survey
Documentation Reliability
(InfantMother)
Elective Delivery Rate prior to 39 completed weeks
gestation (TJC PC01 )
Augmentation Induction Monthly Bundle
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Elective Induction Bundle
Composite Compliance
Time Between (Decision - Incision)
Prophylactic Antibiotic in C-section
Labor Deep Dive
Cesarean rate for low-risk first birth women
(TJC PC02) Elective Induction Monthly Bundle Compliance
(Oxytocin)
Advanced Indicated Induction
Bundle Composite Compliance
Birth trauma rate measures (NQF)
Incidence of episiotomy (NQF)
Patient and Family Centered Care
Gestational Age Reliability (Test
Measure)
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Public Health
bull Public health is a broad subject that arguably embraces all
aspects of our lives from the air we breathe the food we eat the
place we live in work and leisure as well as our genetic ethnic
and cultural heritage
bull All these factors contribute to overall health
bull In order to create the best possible outcomes for women and
babies we need to take the wider social determinants of health
into consideration as we design our healthcare service
bull Health promotion plays a key factor
World Heath Organisation
What are social determinants of health
bull The social determinants of health are the conditions in which
people are born grow live work and age These circumstances
are shaped by the distribution of money power and resources at
global national and local levels The social determinants of health
are mostly responsible for health inequities - the unfair and
avoidable differences in health status seen within and between
countries
Figure 1 The Health Map determinants of health and well-being
From Barton H and Grant M (2006) A health map for the local human habitat The Journal for the Royal Society for the Promotion of health 126(6) pp 252-253 ISSN 1466-4240
Lets begin with the bigger picture
Public health message- Dubai
lt The Public Health amp Safety
Department has initiated a public service campaign to warn children amp pregnant women from entering
cafes with creative messages hung on all the cafes doors in Dubai
The messages will be addressed by the fetus or children amp aimed towards the parents smoking is
your choice not mine
lt Door-sized posters publicising the campaign have been plastered on cafe entrances across the
emirates where people go to smoke the hookah pipes
IHIrsquos Innovation Work
AIM
To develop a population approach to reduce preterm births among Medicaid (women receiving
insurance through the government supported plan)
recipient women
Methods
bull Evidence scan
bull 50+ expert interviewssite visits across 20 states to
identify best practices
bull Expert design meeting
bull Validate theory of change and bundle of interventions
bull Prototype test bundle of interventions with one community
Risk factors for preterm birth
Clinical risk factors bull A previous history of pre-term birth bull Multiple gestation bull Short interval between pregnancies bull Cervical length measured during
pregnancy bull Age (lt16 or gt35) bull Positive fetal fibronectin bull Hypertension bull BMI (underweight or overweight) bull Renal disease bull Anti-phospholipid syndrome bull Antenatal depression bull Genital tract infections bull Preterm rupture of membranes bull Antepartum haemorrhage bull Other
Socialstructural risk factors
bull Late care enrollmentinadequate prenatal care
bull Tobacco use
bull Maternal income
bull Maternal education
bull Maternal stress
bull Marital status
bull Unstable housing
bull Other
Clinical and social interventions to reduce
preterm birth Clinical interventions
bull Progesterone for women with a singleton
gestation and a history of spontaneous PTB
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a
singleton gestation and current short cervix in the second trimester
bull Consideration of cerclage for women with a
singleton gestation and a history of a prior
spontaneous PTB and a current short cervix particularly if the length is lt15 mm
bull Elimination of elective inductions before 39 weeks
bull Evidence-based management of other major
risk factors (eg preeclampsia
management pharmacotherapy to address heavy smoking)
bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Other
Socio-clinical interventions
More evidence
bull Group antenatal care
bull Some home visiting models
bull Psychosocial interventions to promote smoking cessation
bull Midwife-led continuity models
bull Nutrition counseling
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Other
Theory A Population Approach
1 To reduce rates of
preterm birth among
pregnant w omen
2 To improve health and
health care outcomes for pregnant w omen and
new borns
3 To decrease per capita
costs of care
Identify and engage
pregnant w omen at
high risk for preterm
birth and poor birth
outcomes
Provide evidence-
based population-
specif ic perinatal care
bull Evaluate clinical risk factors
bull Evaluate
socialstructural factors
bull Engage vulnerable pregnant women
bull Reliably deliver evidence-based
medical
interventions bull Implement socio-
clinical and community-based
interventions which
best address the risk factors for the local
population
Integrate community
resources to support
pregnant w omen
bull Partner with local
organizations working to serve this
population bull Identify resources to
build and grow care
models
Secondary Drivers Primary Drivers
Aim
Although this design session will focus on strategies to reduce preterm birth any population health system to Integrate Maternal health and Care will include the following components
bull Learning how to apply the emerging evidence to correctly identify when labor begins bull No routine non-medically indicated inductions bull No routine separation of mother and baby regardless if the birth occurs vaginally or by cesarean and bull Providing support to women and their family members through the postpartum and discharge period
Interventions
bull Home visiting models bull Peer support modelsGroup prenatal Care
bull Prenatal substance abuse programs (eg
for opiate addiction) bull Pregnancy Medical Home elements
bull Interventions to promote smoking cessation bull Nutrition counseling
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a singleton gestation and history of
spontaneous PTB or current short cervix in
the second trimester bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Use of LARCsother postpartum contraception
Bundle of Interventions
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Peer support (including group prenatal care)
bull Integration of substance use treatment and perinatal care
bull Shared decision making around pregnancy intention
Testing our theory lessons learned
bull Spectrum of pregnancy intention
bull Closing the disparity gap
bull Maternal outcomes
Next steps Prototype testing
bull Partnership with Detroit WIN Network and
HFHS
bull Co-design community intervention based on
interventions
bull 9-month prototype test
A Historical Reflection 1995-2016
1995 BTS Improving Maternal and
Neonatal Outcomes
bull Reducing Cesarean Section Rates
National Congress
Innovation (2003-2006) IMPACT (2006 ndash 2009) Perinatal Improvement
Community (2009 ndash 2014)
Expert Meeting (2003)
Developed idealized Design
Concept Diagram (2004)
Oxytocin Bundles Meeting
(2004)
Phase I Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2004)
Phase II Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2005)
Initial Change Package for OB (2006)
100000 Lives Campaign ndash
mentor netw ork (OB) (2006)
AIM Reduce birth trauma and risk by innovative design and testing by
February 2006
AIM Reduction of Harm Outcome Measure- Perinatal Adverse Events
AIM Reducing Harm Improving Care Supporting Health
IHI Perinatal Focused Work Timeline
White Paper (2006)
Launch Perinatal IMPACT Community (2006)
IHI Perinatal Web and Action (2006)
Catholic Healthcare West (2006)
Mayo System (2006)
Developed Building Blocks (2007)
Developed Initial Driver Diagram (2007)
Oxytocin High Alert Medication Deep Dive (2007)
Vacuum Bundle Developed (2008 )
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance
bull Wales 1000 Lives Campaign (2007)
bull Northern Ireland (2009)
IMPACT Ended (82009)
PIC initiated (92009)
International Teams joined Community (2009-2014)
Expedition Improving Perinatal Safety -- The Oxytocin Bundle (2010)
Faculty Team expanded PIC Hospital Members (2010)
Innovation Workgroup Second Stage Safety (2010)
Labor Deep Dive Tool (2010)
Revised Driver Diagram -Leadership (2010)
Advanced Bundles developed (2010)
Birth Outcomes Initiative - Louisiana (2010 -2012)
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance (Scotland amp
Denmark) (2011)
Faculty Team expanded Patient Representative (2011)
ACOG Toolkit (IHI oxytocin bundles) (2012)
IHI How to Guide Obstetrical Adverse Events (2012)
Obstetrical Sepsis Summit (2012)
NCC Uses Oxytocin Bundles for Certif ication (2012)
Deep Dive Structure Tool (2012)
IHI HEN HRET (Perinatal Content) (2012)
Louisiana Cohort (20132014)
Louisiana HEN merged w LA Cohort (2013)
Maternity Action Team (2013)
Retired Original Oxytocin Bundles ((2013)
Expedition Treating Maternal Sepsis (2013)
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
Late Preterm Infant (2013)
Innovation Neonatal Workgroup (2013)
Innovation Nulliparous Workgroup (2013)
CMS Louisiana Performance Improvement Grant (2013)
Maternity Action Playbook Leadership Driver amp Change
Package (2014)
Critical Incident Coaching (2014)
IHI Perinatal Community Care Bundle Sequencing
Elective Induction Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
Augmentation Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
IHI Oxytocin Bundles (2004)
bull GAgt39 weeks
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Category I-normal)
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Exclusion of Category III)
Basic Oxytocin Bundles Defined as patient who receives
Oxytocin for elective induction or augmentation Focus on
eliminating elective delivery prior to 39 weeks adoption
of team definition and reliable execution of component
indicators
IHI Advanced Bundles (2010) Accept 39 weeks as minimal GA for elective delivery Bishop score of more than 8 in the nulliparous patient the probability of vaginal delivery after labor induction is similar to spontaneous laborFocus moves to pharmacologic or mechanical initiation of labor- no longer focused on (just) Oxytocin Evidence Based Gestational dating is core
Additional Bundles developed and or
supported by faculty and Innovation
Workgroups
Advanced Non-Medically
Indicated Bundle
Advanced Indicated Induction Bundle
Advanced Augmentation Bundle
Vacuum Bundle (2008)
Defined Patient without a
medical indication for delivery
bull Confi rmation of term
gestation
bull Pelvic Assessment Favorable
Bishop Score (locally
defined)
bull Recognition and
management of
compl ications of induction
method (including
tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I-
normal)
Defined Patient with a medical
indication for induction
bull Acceptable medical indication for
labor induction documented
(locally defined)
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
compl ications of induction method
(including tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management of
FHR Status
Exclus ion of Category III FHR
Defined
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management
of tachysystole
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I -
normal)
bull (Exclusion of Category II I)
(May include amniotomy nipple
s timulation acupuncture and
Oxytocin)
bull Alternative labor s trategies
bull Prepared patient
bull High probability of success
bull Maximum application time and
number of pop-offs predetermined
bull Exit s trategy available
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
bull NRP appropriate (vigorous infant 37
-41+ w eeks gestation
bull Identif ication of risk of
infectionsepsis
bull Delayed cord clamping
bull Breastfeeding Initiation
bull Delayed bath- (for f irst hour of life
bull Align Unit Measures Strategies Projects w ith Org Strategy and Goals (Clinical
Patient Exp Financial and Workforce)
bull Channel Senior Leadership Attention and Develop Unit Leadership
bull Engage Physicians
bull Build Improvement Capacity and Provide Resources for Improvement bull Establish a Just Culture
bull Develop a Competent Trained and Available Workforce
bull Establish Credentialing of Core Competency and Training for all Providers
bull Use ACOGAWHONN Guidelines for Documentation and Staff ing
bull Develop a Consumer Advisory Board
Perinatal
Leadership
bull Execute care that meets national standards (Implement Bundles Perinatal Core
Processes)
bull Develop standard processes and protocols for response to obstetrical emergency
bull Design care process improvement based on trigger tool analysis event detection
sentinel event bull Standardize administration of high alert medications ndash oxytocin magnesium sulfate
epidurals
bull Create an environment that Supports Care and Healing
bull Consider segments of population and design reliable and appropriate processes for
specif ic needs and characteristics of this segment of the population
Reliable
Design Reduce Variation
bull Adopt common language and interpretation of EFM w ith multi-disciplinary training ie
NICHD criteria
bull Implement techniques for effective communication ie SBAR
bull Establish reliable techniques for handoffs
bull Establish Team Response Protocols bull Implement Huddles
bull Design Simulations
Effective
Peer Teamwork
bull Design processes to support partnership in care betw een provider and patient and
family
bull Develop w ith patient a customized interdisciplinary shared care plan
bull Design care process improvement based on information obtained about patient
experience (interviews assessments focus groups surveys) bull Include patients and families on design and improvement teams
bull Communicate openly and honestly w ith family and patients at regular intervals
bull Do w hat you say mean w hat you do
Respectful
Patient Partnership
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births
Zero incidence of
elective deliveries prior to confirmation
of fetal maturity
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or
Compliance greater than 90
Improve organizational
culture of safety survey scores in
Perinatal units by 25
100 of participating
teams will have documentation of Patient amp
Family Centered Care
Perinatal Community
Reducing Harm Improving Care
Supporting Healing
Reduce Harm Improve Care
Support Healing
Respectful Patient
Partnership
Reliable Design amp Reduce Variation
Effective
Peer Teamwork
Perinatal Leadership
Perinatal Improvement Community
Measurement Strategy
Collaborative Perinatal Goals
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births Zero incidence of elective deliveries prior to confirmation of fetal maturity (39 weeks)
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or Compliance great than 90 Improve organizational culture of safety survey scores in Perinatal units by 25
100 of the participating teams will have documentation of Patient amp Family Centered Care
Perinatal Care Measurement Strategy Required Measures Optional Measures
Annual Bi-annual
Structure Assessments
Monthly Outcome amp Structure
Measures
Initial Weekly or Monthly
Process Measures
Advanced Weekly or Monthly
Outcome and Process Measures
Outcome Balance or Process
Measures
Oxytocin Deep Dive
Perinatal Harm
Augmentation Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Vacuum Bundle CompositeCompliance
Transfer to Higher Level of Care (A) (B)
Time Between Elective Deliveries
39 wks
Elective Induction Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Augmentation
Bundle Composite Compliance
Patient and Family Satisfaction
Culture of Safety Survey
Documentation Reliability
(InfantMother)
Elective Delivery Rate prior to 39 completed weeks
gestation (TJC PC01 )
Augmentation Induction Monthly Bundle
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Elective Induction Bundle
Composite Compliance
Time Between (Decision - Incision)
Prophylactic Antibiotic in C-section
Labor Deep Dive
Cesarean rate for low-risk first birth women
(TJC PC02) Elective Induction Monthly Bundle Compliance
(Oxytocin)
Advanced Indicated Induction
Bundle Composite Compliance
Birth trauma rate measures (NQF)
Incidence of episiotomy (NQF)
Patient and Family Centered Care
Gestational Age Reliability (Test
Measure)
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
World Heath Organisation
What are social determinants of health
bull The social determinants of health are the conditions in which
people are born grow live work and age These circumstances
are shaped by the distribution of money power and resources at
global national and local levels The social determinants of health
are mostly responsible for health inequities - the unfair and
avoidable differences in health status seen within and between
countries
Figure 1 The Health Map determinants of health and well-being
From Barton H and Grant M (2006) A health map for the local human habitat The Journal for the Royal Society for the Promotion of health 126(6) pp 252-253 ISSN 1466-4240
Lets begin with the bigger picture
Public health message- Dubai
lt The Public Health amp Safety
Department has initiated a public service campaign to warn children amp pregnant women from entering
cafes with creative messages hung on all the cafes doors in Dubai
The messages will be addressed by the fetus or children amp aimed towards the parents smoking is
your choice not mine
lt Door-sized posters publicising the campaign have been plastered on cafe entrances across the
emirates where people go to smoke the hookah pipes
IHIrsquos Innovation Work
AIM
To develop a population approach to reduce preterm births among Medicaid (women receiving
insurance through the government supported plan)
recipient women
Methods
bull Evidence scan
bull 50+ expert interviewssite visits across 20 states to
identify best practices
bull Expert design meeting
bull Validate theory of change and bundle of interventions
bull Prototype test bundle of interventions with one community
Risk factors for preterm birth
Clinical risk factors bull A previous history of pre-term birth bull Multiple gestation bull Short interval between pregnancies bull Cervical length measured during
pregnancy bull Age (lt16 or gt35) bull Positive fetal fibronectin bull Hypertension bull BMI (underweight or overweight) bull Renal disease bull Anti-phospholipid syndrome bull Antenatal depression bull Genital tract infections bull Preterm rupture of membranes bull Antepartum haemorrhage bull Other
Socialstructural risk factors
bull Late care enrollmentinadequate prenatal care
bull Tobacco use
bull Maternal income
bull Maternal education
bull Maternal stress
bull Marital status
bull Unstable housing
bull Other
Clinical and social interventions to reduce
preterm birth Clinical interventions
bull Progesterone for women with a singleton
gestation and a history of spontaneous PTB
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a
singleton gestation and current short cervix in the second trimester
bull Consideration of cerclage for women with a
singleton gestation and a history of a prior
spontaneous PTB and a current short cervix particularly if the length is lt15 mm
bull Elimination of elective inductions before 39 weeks
bull Evidence-based management of other major
risk factors (eg preeclampsia
management pharmacotherapy to address heavy smoking)
bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Other
Socio-clinical interventions
More evidence
bull Group antenatal care
bull Some home visiting models
bull Psychosocial interventions to promote smoking cessation
bull Midwife-led continuity models
bull Nutrition counseling
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Other
Theory A Population Approach
1 To reduce rates of
preterm birth among
pregnant w omen
2 To improve health and
health care outcomes for pregnant w omen and
new borns
3 To decrease per capita
costs of care
Identify and engage
pregnant w omen at
high risk for preterm
birth and poor birth
outcomes
Provide evidence-
based population-
specif ic perinatal care
bull Evaluate clinical risk factors
bull Evaluate
socialstructural factors
bull Engage vulnerable pregnant women
bull Reliably deliver evidence-based
medical
interventions bull Implement socio-
clinical and community-based
interventions which
best address the risk factors for the local
population
Integrate community
resources to support
pregnant w omen
bull Partner with local
organizations working to serve this
population bull Identify resources to
build and grow care
models
Secondary Drivers Primary Drivers
Aim
Although this design session will focus on strategies to reduce preterm birth any population health system to Integrate Maternal health and Care will include the following components
bull Learning how to apply the emerging evidence to correctly identify when labor begins bull No routine non-medically indicated inductions bull No routine separation of mother and baby regardless if the birth occurs vaginally or by cesarean and bull Providing support to women and their family members through the postpartum and discharge period
Interventions
bull Home visiting models bull Peer support modelsGroup prenatal Care
bull Prenatal substance abuse programs (eg
for opiate addiction) bull Pregnancy Medical Home elements
bull Interventions to promote smoking cessation bull Nutrition counseling
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a singleton gestation and history of
spontaneous PTB or current short cervix in
the second trimester bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Use of LARCsother postpartum contraception
Bundle of Interventions
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Peer support (including group prenatal care)
bull Integration of substance use treatment and perinatal care
bull Shared decision making around pregnancy intention
Testing our theory lessons learned
bull Spectrum of pregnancy intention
bull Closing the disparity gap
bull Maternal outcomes
Next steps Prototype testing
bull Partnership with Detroit WIN Network and
HFHS
bull Co-design community intervention based on
interventions
bull 9-month prototype test
A Historical Reflection 1995-2016
1995 BTS Improving Maternal and
Neonatal Outcomes
bull Reducing Cesarean Section Rates
National Congress
Innovation (2003-2006) IMPACT (2006 ndash 2009) Perinatal Improvement
Community (2009 ndash 2014)
Expert Meeting (2003)
Developed idealized Design
Concept Diagram (2004)
Oxytocin Bundles Meeting
(2004)
Phase I Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2004)
Phase II Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2005)
Initial Change Package for OB (2006)
100000 Lives Campaign ndash
mentor netw ork (OB) (2006)
AIM Reduce birth trauma and risk by innovative design and testing by
February 2006
AIM Reduction of Harm Outcome Measure- Perinatal Adverse Events
AIM Reducing Harm Improving Care Supporting Health
IHI Perinatal Focused Work Timeline
White Paper (2006)
Launch Perinatal IMPACT Community (2006)
IHI Perinatal Web and Action (2006)
Catholic Healthcare West (2006)
Mayo System (2006)
Developed Building Blocks (2007)
Developed Initial Driver Diagram (2007)
Oxytocin High Alert Medication Deep Dive (2007)
Vacuum Bundle Developed (2008 )
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance
bull Wales 1000 Lives Campaign (2007)
bull Northern Ireland (2009)
IMPACT Ended (82009)
PIC initiated (92009)
International Teams joined Community (2009-2014)
Expedition Improving Perinatal Safety -- The Oxytocin Bundle (2010)
Faculty Team expanded PIC Hospital Members (2010)
Innovation Workgroup Second Stage Safety (2010)
Labor Deep Dive Tool (2010)
Revised Driver Diagram -Leadership (2010)
Advanced Bundles developed (2010)
Birth Outcomes Initiative - Louisiana (2010 -2012)
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance (Scotland amp
Denmark) (2011)
Faculty Team expanded Patient Representative (2011)
ACOG Toolkit (IHI oxytocin bundles) (2012)
IHI How to Guide Obstetrical Adverse Events (2012)
Obstetrical Sepsis Summit (2012)
NCC Uses Oxytocin Bundles for Certif ication (2012)
Deep Dive Structure Tool (2012)
IHI HEN HRET (Perinatal Content) (2012)
Louisiana Cohort (20132014)
Louisiana HEN merged w LA Cohort (2013)
Maternity Action Team (2013)
Retired Original Oxytocin Bundles ((2013)
Expedition Treating Maternal Sepsis (2013)
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
Late Preterm Infant (2013)
Innovation Neonatal Workgroup (2013)
Innovation Nulliparous Workgroup (2013)
CMS Louisiana Performance Improvement Grant (2013)
Maternity Action Playbook Leadership Driver amp Change
Package (2014)
Critical Incident Coaching (2014)
IHI Perinatal Community Care Bundle Sequencing
Elective Induction Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
Augmentation Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
IHI Oxytocin Bundles (2004)
bull GAgt39 weeks
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Category I-normal)
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Exclusion of Category III)
Basic Oxytocin Bundles Defined as patient who receives
Oxytocin for elective induction or augmentation Focus on
eliminating elective delivery prior to 39 weeks adoption
of team definition and reliable execution of component
indicators
IHI Advanced Bundles (2010) Accept 39 weeks as minimal GA for elective delivery Bishop score of more than 8 in the nulliparous patient the probability of vaginal delivery after labor induction is similar to spontaneous laborFocus moves to pharmacologic or mechanical initiation of labor- no longer focused on (just) Oxytocin Evidence Based Gestational dating is core
Additional Bundles developed and or
supported by faculty and Innovation
Workgroups
Advanced Non-Medically
Indicated Bundle
Advanced Indicated Induction Bundle
Advanced Augmentation Bundle
Vacuum Bundle (2008)
Defined Patient without a
medical indication for delivery
bull Confi rmation of term
gestation
bull Pelvic Assessment Favorable
Bishop Score (locally
defined)
bull Recognition and
management of
compl ications of induction
method (including
tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I-
normal)
Defined Patient with a medical
indication for induction
bull Acceptable medical indication for
labor induction documented
(locally defined)
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
compl ications of induction method
(including tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management of
FHR Status
Exclus ion of Category III FHR
Defined
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management
of tachysystole
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I -
normal)
bull (Exclusion of Category II I)
(May include amniotomy nipple
s timulation acupuncture and
Oxytocin)
bull Alternative labor s trategies
bull Prepared patient
bull High probability of success
bull Maximum application time and
number of pop-offs predetermined
bull Exit s trategy available
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
bull NRP appropriate (vigorous infant 37
-41+ w eeks gestation
bull Identif ication of risk of
infectionsepsis
bull Delayed cord clamping
bull Breastfeeding Initiation
bull Delayed bath- (for f irst hour of life
bull Align Unit Measures Strategies Projects w ith Org Strategy and Goals (Clinical
Patient Exp Financial and Workforce)
bull Channel Senior Leadership Attention and Develop Unit Leadership
bull Engage Physicians
bull Build Improvement Capacity and Provide Resources for Improvement bull Establish a Just Culture
bull Develop a Competent Trained and Available Workforce
bull Establish Credentialing of Core Competency and Training for all Providers
bull Use ACOGAWHONN Guidelines for Documentation and Staff ing
bull Develop a Consumer Advisory Board
Perinatal
Leadership
bull Execute care that meets national standards (Implement Bundles Perinatal Core
Processes)
bull Develop standard processes and protocols for response to obstetrical emergency
bull Design care process improvement based on trigger tool analysis event detection
sentinel event bull Standardize administration of high alert medications ndash oxytocin magnesium sulfate
epidurals
bull Create an environment that Supports Care and Healing
bull Consider segments of population and design reliable and appropriate processes for
specif ic needs and characteristics of this segment of the population
Reliable
Design Reduce Variation
bull Adopt common language and interpretation of EFM w ith multi-disciplinary training ie
NICHD criteria
bull Implement techniques for effective communication ie SBAR
bull Establish reliable techniques for handoffs
bull Establish Team Response Protocols bull Implement Huddles
bull Design Simulations
Effective
Peer Teamwork
bull Design processes to support partnership in care betw een provider and patient and
family
bull Develop w ith patient a customized interdisciplinary shared care plan
bull Design care process improvement based on information obtained about patient
experience (interviews assessments focus groups surveys) bull Include patients and families on design and improvement teams
bull Communicate openly and honestly w ith family and patients at regular intervals
bull Do w hat you say mean w hat you do
Respectful
Patient Partnership
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births
Zero incidence of
elective deliveries prior to confirmation
of fetal maturity
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or
Compliance greater than 90
Improve organizational
culture of safety survey scores in
Perinatal units by 25
100 of participating
teams will have documentation of Patient amp
Family Centered Care
Perinatal Community
Reducing Harm Improving Care
Supporting Healing
Reduce Harm Improve Care
Support Healing
Respectful Patient
Partnership
Reliable Design amp Reduce Variation
Effective
Peer Teamwork
Perinatal Leadership
Perinatal Improvement Community
Measurement Strategy
Collaborative Perinatal Goals
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births Zero incidence of elective deliveries prior to confirmation of fetal maturity (39 weeks)
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or Compliance great than 90 Improve organizational culture of safety survey scores in Perinatal units by 25
100 of the participating teams will have documentation of Patient amp Family Centered Care
Perinatal Care Measurement Strategy Required Measures Optional Measures
Annual Bi-annual
Structure Assessments
Monthly Outcome amp Structure
Measures
Initial Weekly or Monthly
Process Measures
Advanced Weekly or Monthly
Outcome and Process Measures
Outcome Balance or Process
Measures
Oxytocin Deep Dive
Perinatal Harm
Augmentation Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Vacuum Bundle CompositeCompliance
Transfer to Higher Level of Care (A) (B)
Time Between Elective Deliveries
39 wks
Elective Induction Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Augmentation
Bundle Composite Compliance
Patient and Family Satisfaction
Culture of Safety Survey
Documentation Reliability
(InfantMother)
Elective Delivery Rate prior to 39 completed weeks
gestation (TJC PC01 )
Augmentation Induction Monthly Bundle
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Elective Induction Bundle
Composite Compliance
Time Between (Decision - Incision)
Prophylactic Antibiotic in C-section
Labor Deep Dive
Cesarean rate for low-risk first birth women
(TJC PC02) Elective Induction Monthly Bundle Compliance
(Oxytocin)
Advanced Indicated Induction
Bundle Composite Compliance
Birth trauma rate measures (NQF)
Incidence of episiotomy (NQF)
Patient and Family Centered Care
Gestational Age Reliability (Test
Measure)
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Figure 1 The Health Map determinants of health and well-being
From Barton H and Grant M (2006) A health map for the local human habitat The Journal for the Royal Society for the Promotion of health 126(6) pp 252-253 ISSN 1466-4240
Lets begin with the bigger picture
Public health message- Dubai
lt The Public Health amp Safety
Department has initiated a public service campaign to warn children amp pregnant women from entering
cafes with creative messages hung on all the cafes doors in Dubai
The messages will be addressed by the fetus or children amp aimed towards the parents smoking is
your choice not mine
lt Door-sized posters publicising the campaign have been plastered on cafe entrances across the
emirates where people go to smoke the hookah pipes
IHIrsquos Innovation Work
AIM
To develop a population approach to reduce preterm births among Medicaid (women receiving
insurance through the government supported plan)
recipient women
Methods
bull Evidence scan
bull 50+ expert interviewssite visits across 20 states to
identify best practices
bull Expert design meeting
bull Validate theory of change and bundle of interventions
bull Prototype test bundle of interventions with one community
Risk factors for preterm birth
Clinical risk factors bull A previous history of pre-term birth bull Multiple gestation bull Short interval between pregnancies bull Cervical length measured during
pregnancy bull Age (lt16 or gt35) bull Positive fetal fibronectin bull Hypertension bull BMI (underweight or overweight) bull Renal disease bull Anti-phospholipid syndrome bull Antenatal depression bull Genital tract infections bull Preterm rupture of membranes bull Antepartum haemorrhage bull Other
Socialstructural risk factors
bull Late care enrollmentinadequate prenatal care
bull Tobacco use
bull Maternal income
bull Maternal education
bull Maternal stress
bull Marital status
bull Unstable housing
bull Other
Clinical and social interventions to reduce
preterm birth Clinical interventions
bull Progesterone for women with a singleton
gestation and a history of spontaneous PTB
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a
singleton gestation and current short cervix in the second trimester
bull Consideration of cerclage for women with a
singleton gestation and a history of a prior
spontaneous PTB and a current short cervix particularly if the length is lt15 mm
bull Elimination of elective inductions before 39 weeks
bull Evidence-based management of other major
risk factors (eg preeclampsia
management pharmacotherapy to address heavy smoking)
bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Other
Socio-clinical interventions
More evidence
bull Group antenatal care
bull Some home visiting models
bull Psychosocial interventions to promote smoking cessation
bull Midwife-led continuity models
bull Nutrition counseling
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Other
Theory A Population Approach
1 To reduce rates of
preterm birth among
pregnant w omen
2 To improve health and
health care outcomes for pregnant w omen and
new borns
3 To decrease per capita
costs of care
Identify and engage
pregnant w omen at
high risk for preterm
birth and poor birth
outcomes
Provide evidence-
based population-
specif ic perinatal care
bull Evaluate clinical risk factors
bull Evaluate
socialstructural factors
bull Engage vulnerable pregnant women
bull Reliably deliver evidence-based
medical
interventions bull Implement socio-
clinical and community-based
interventions which
best address the risk factors for the local
population
Integrate community
resources to support
pregnant w omen
bull Partner with local
organizations working to serve this
population bull Identify resources to
build and grow care
models
Secondary Drivers Primary Drivers
Aim
Although this design session will focus on strategies to reduce preterm birth any population health system to Integrate Maternal health and Care will include the following components
bull Learning how to apply the emerging evidence to correctly identify when labor begins bull No routine non-medically indicated inductions bull No routine separation of mother and baby regardless if the birth occurs vaginally or by cesarean and bull Providing support to women and their family members through the postpartum and discharge period
Interventions
bull Home visiting models bull Peer support modelsGroup prenatal Care
bull Prenatal substance abuse programs (eg
for opiate addiction) bull Pregnancy Medical Home elements
bull Interventions to promote smoking cessation bull Nutrition counseling
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a singleton gestation and history of
spontaneous PTB or current short cervix in
the second trimester bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Use of LARCsother postpartum contraception
Bundle of Interventions
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Peer support (including group prenatal care)
bull Integration of substance use treatment and perinatal care
bull Shared decision making around pregnancy intention
Testing our theory lessons learned
bull Spectrum of pregnancy intention
bull Closing the disparity gap
bull Maternal outcomes
Next steps Prototype testing
bull Partnership with Detroit WIN Network and
HFHS
bull Co-design community intervention based on
interventions
bull 9-month prototype test
A Historical Reflection 1995-2016
1995 BTS Improving Maternal and
Neonatal Outcomes
bull Reducing Cesarean Section Rates
National Congress
Innovation (2003-2006) IMPACT (2006 ndash 2009) Perinatal Improvement
Community (2009 ndash 2014)
Expert Meeting (2003)
Developed idealized Design
Concept Diagram (2004)
Oxytocin Bundles Meeting
(2004)
Phase I Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2004)
Phase II Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2005)
Initial Change Package for OB (2006)
100000 Lives Campaign ndash
mentor netw ork (OB) (2006)
AIM Reduce birth trauma and risk by innovative design and testing by
February 2006
AIM Reduction of Harm Outcome Measure- Perinatal Adverse Events
AIM Reducing Harm Improving Care Supporting Health
IHI Perinatal Focused Work Timeline
White Paper (2006)
Launch Perinatal IMPACT Community (2006)
IHI Perinatal Web and Action (2006)
Catholic Healthcare West (2006)
Mayo System (2006)
Developed Building Blocks (2007)
Developed Initial Driver Diagram (2007)
Oxytocin High Alert Medication Deep Dive (2007)
Vacuum Bundle Developed (2008 )
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance
bull Wales 1000 Lives Campaign (2007)
bull Northern Ireland (2009)
IMPACT Ended (82009)
PIC initiated (92009)
International Teams joined Community (2009-2014)
Expedition Improving Perinatal Safety -- The Oxytocin Bundle (2010)
Faculty Team expanded PIC Hospital Members (2010)
Innovation Workgroup Second Stage Safety (2010)
Labor Deep Dive Tool (2010)
Revised Driver Diagram -Leadership (2010)
Advanced Bundles developed (2010)
Birth Outcomes Initiative - Louisiana (2010 -2012)
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance (Scotland amp
Denmark) (2011)
Faculty Team expanded Patient Representative (2011)
ACOG Toolkit (IHI oxytocin bundles) (2012)
IHI How to Guide Obstetrical Adverse Events (2012)
Obstetrical Sepsis Summit (2012)
NCC Uses Oxytocin Bundles for Certif ication (2012)
Deep Dive Structure Tool (2012)
IHI HEN HRET (Perinatal Content) (2012)
Louisiana Cohort (20132014)
Louisiana HEN merged w LA Cohort (2013)
Maternity Action Team (2013)
Retired Original Oxytocin Bundles ((2013)
Expedition Treating Maternal Sepsis (2013)
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
Late Preterm Infant (2013)
Innovation Neonatal Workgroup (2013)
Innovation Nulliparous Workgroup (2013)
CMS Louisiana Performance Improvement Grant (2013)
Maternity Action Playbook Leadership Driver amp Change
Package (2014)
Critical Incident Coaching (2014)
IHI Perinatal Community Care Bundle Sequencing
Elective Induction Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
Augmentation Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
IHI Oxytocin Bundles (2004)
bull GAgt39 weeks
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Category I-normal)
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Exclusion of Category III)
Basic Oxytocin Bundles Defined as patient who receives
Oxytocin for elective induction or augmentation Focus on
eliminating elective delivery prior to 39 weeks adoption
of team definition and reliable execution of component
indicators
IHI Advanced Bundles (2010) Accept 39 weeks as minimal GA for elective delivery Bishop score of more than 8 in the nulliparous patient the probability of vaginal delivery after labor induction is similar to spontaneous laborFocus moves to pharmacologic or mechanical initiation of labor- no longer focused on (just) Oxytocin Evidence Based Gestational dating is core
Additional Bundles developed and or
supported by faculty and Innovation
Workgroups
Advanced Non-Medically
Indicated Bundle
Advanced Indicated Induction Bundle
Advanced Augmentation Bundle
Vacuum Bundle (2008)
Defined Patient without a
medical indication for delivery
bull Confi rmation of term
gestation
bull Pelvic Assessment Favorable
Bishop Score (locally
defined)
bull Recognition and
management of
compl ications of induction
method (including
tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I-
normal)
Defined Patient with a medical
indication for induction
bull Acceptable medical indication for
labor induction documented
(locally defined)
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
compl ications of induction method
(including tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management of
FHR Status
Exclus ion of Category III FHR
Defined
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management
of tachysystole
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I -
normal)
bull (Exclusion of Category II I)
(May include amniotomy nipple
s timulation acupuncture and
Oxytocin)
bull Alternative labor s trategies
bull Prepared patient
bull High probability of success
bull Maximum application time and
number of pop-offs predetermined
bull Exit s trategy available
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
bull NRP appropriate (vigorous infant 37
-41+ w eeks gestation
bull Identif ication of risk of
infectionsepsis
bull Delayed cord clamping
bull Breastfeeding Initiation
bull Delayed bath- (for f irst hour of life
bull Align Unit Measures Strategies Projects w ith Org Strategy and Goals (Clinical
Patient Exp Financial and Workforce)
bull Channel Senior Leadership Attention and Develop Unit Leadership
bull Engage Physicians
bull Build Improvement Capacity and Provide Resources for Improvement bull Establish a Just Culture
bull Develop a Competent Trained and Available Workforce
bull Establish Credentialing of Core Competency and Training for all Providers
bull Use ACOGAWHONN Guidelines for Documentation and Staff ing
bull Develop a Consumer Advisory Board
Perinatal
Leadership
bull Execute care that meets national standards (Implement Bundles Perinatal Core
Processes)
bull Develop standard processes and protocols for response to obstetrical emergency
bull Design care process improvement based on trigger tool analysis event detection
sentinel event bull Standardize administration of high alert medications ndash oxytocin magnesium sulfate
epidurals
bull Create an environment that Supports Care and Healing
bull Consider segments of population and design reliable and appropriate processes for
specif ic needs and characteristics of this segment of the population
Reliable
Design Reduce Variation
bull Adopt common language and interpretation of EFM w ith multi-disciplinary training ie
NICHD criteria
bull Implement techniques for effective communication ie SBAR
bull Establish reliable techniques for handoffs
bull Establish Team Response Protocols bull Implement Huddles
bull Design Simulations
Effective
Peer Teamwork
bull Design processes to support partnership in care betw een provider and patient and
family
bull Develop w ith patient a customized interdisciplinary shared care plan
bull Design care process improvement based on information obtained about patient
experience (interviews assessments focus groups surveys) bull Include patients and families on design and improvement teams
bull Communicate openly and honestly w ith family and patients at regular intervals
bull Do w hat you say mean w hat you do
Respectful
Patient Partnership
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births
Zero incidence of
elective deliveries prior to confirmation
of fetal maturity
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or
Compliance greater than 90
Improve organizational
culture of safety survey scores in
Perinatal units by 25
100 of participating
teams will have documentation of Patient amp
Family Centered Care
Perinatal Community
Reducing Harm Improving Care
Supporting Healing
Reduce Harm Improve Care
Support Healing
Respectful Patient
Partnership
Reliable Design amp Reduce Variation
Effective
Peer Teamwork
Perinatal Leadership
Perinatal Improvement Community
Measurement Strategy
Collaborative Perinatal Goals
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births Zero incidence of elective deliveries prior to confirmation of fetal maturity (39 weeks)
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or Compliance great than 90 Improve organizational culture of safety survey scores in Perinatal units by 25
100 of the participating teams will have documentation of Patient amp Family Centered Care
Perinatal Care Measurement Strategy Required Measures Optional Measures
Annual Bi-annual
Structure Assessments
Monthly Outcome amp Structure
Measures
Initial Weekly or Monthly
Process Measures
Advanced Weekly or Monthly
Outcome and Process Measures
Outcome Balance or Process
Measures
Oxytocin Deep Dive
Perinatal Harm
Augmentation Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Vacuum Bundle CompositeCompliance
Transfer to Higher Level of Care (A) (B)
Time Between Elective Deliveries
39 wks
Elective Induction Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Augmentation
Bundle Composite Compliance
Patient and Family Satisfaction
Culture of Safety Survey
Documentation Reliability
(InfantMother)
Elective Delivery Rate prior to 39 completed weeks
gestation (TJC PC01 )
Augmentation Induction Monthly Bundle
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Elective Induction Bundle
Composite Compliance
Time Between (Decision - Incision)
Prophylactic Antibiotic in C-section
Labor Deep Dive
Cesarean rate for low-risk first birth women
(TJC PC02) Elective Induction Monthly Bundle Compliance
(Oxytocin)
Advanced Indicated Induction
Bundle Composite Compliance
Birth trauma rate measures (NQF)
Incidence of episiotomy (NQF)
Patient and Family Centered Care
Gestational Age Reliability (Test
Measure)
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Lets begin with the bigger picture
Public health message- Dubai
lt The Public Health amp Safety
Department has initiated a public service campaign to warn children amp pregnant women from entering
cafes with creative messages hung on all the cafes doors in Dubai
The messages will be addressed by the fetus or children amp aimed towards the parents smoking is
your choice not mine
lt Door-sized posters publicising the campaign have been plastered on cafe entrances across the
emirates where people go to smoke the hookah pipes
IHIrsquos Innovation Work
AIM
To develop a population approach to reduce preterm births among Medicaid (women receiving
insurance through the government supported plan)
recipient women
Methods
bull Evidence scan
bull 50+ expert interviewssite visits across 20 states to
identify best practices
bull Expert design meeting
bull Validate theory of change and bundle of interventions
bull Prototype test bundle of interventions with one community
Risk factors for preterm birth
Clinical risk factors bull A previous history of pre-term birth bull Multiple gestation bull Short interval between pregnancies bull Cervical length measured during
pregnancy bull Age (lt16 or gt35) bull Positive fetal fibronectin bull Hypertension bull BMI (underweight or overweight) bull Renal disease bull Anti-phospholipid syndrome bull Antenatal depression bull Genital tract infections bull Preterm rupture of membranes bull Antepartum haemorrhage bull Other
Socialstructural risk factors
bull Late care enrollmentinadequate prenatal care
bull Tobacco use
bull Maternal income
bull Maternal education
bull Maternal stress
bull Marital status
bull Unstable housing
bull Other
Clinical and social interventions to reduce
preterm birth Clinical interventions
bull Progesterone for women with a singleton
gestation and a history of spontaneous PTB
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a
singleton gestation and current short cervix in the second trimester
bull Consideration of cerclage for women with a
singleton gestation and a history of a prior
spontaneous PTB and a current short cervix particularly if the length is lt15 mm
bull Elimination of elective inductions before 39 weeks
bull Evidence-based management of other major
risk factors (eg preeclampsia
management pharmacotherapy to address heavy smoking)
bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Other
Socio-clinical interventions
More evidence
bull Group antenatal care
bull Some home visiting models
bull Psychosocial interventions to promote smoking cessation
bull Midwife-led continuity models
bull Nutrition counseling
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Other
Theory A Population Approach
1 To reduce rates of
preterm birth among
pregnant w omen
2 To improve health and
health care outcomes for pregnant w omen and
new borns
3 To decrease per capita
costs of care
Identify and engage
pregnant w omen at
high risk for preterm
birth and poor birth
outcomes
Provide evidence-
based population-
specif ic perinatal care
bull Evaluate clinical risk factors
bull Evaluate
socialstructural factors
bull Engage vulnerable pregnant women
bull Reliably deliver evidence-based
medical
interventions bull Implement socio-
clinical and community-based
interventions which
best address the risk factors for the local
population
Integrate community
resources to support
pregnant w omen
bull Partner with local
organizations working to serve this
population bull Identify resources to
build and grow care
models
Secondary Drivers Primary Drivers
Aim
Although this design session will focus on strategies to reduce preterm birth any population health system to Integrate Maternal health and Care will include the following components
bull Learning how to apply the emerging evidence to correctly identify when labor begins bull No routine non-medically indicated inductions bull No routine separation of mother and baby regardless if the birth occurs vaginally or by cesarean and bull Providing support to women and their family members through the postpartum and discharge period
Interventions
bull Home visiting models bull Peer support modelsGroup prenatal Care
bull Prenatal substance abuse programs (eg
for opiate addiction) bull Pregnancy Medical Home elements
bull Interventions to promote smoking cessation bull Nutrition counseling
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a singleton gestation and history of
spontaneous PTB or current short cervix in
the second trimester bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Use of LARCsother postpartum contraception
Bundle of Interventions
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Peer support (including group prenatal care)
bull Integration of substance use treatment and perinatal care
bull Shared decision making around pregnancy intention
Testing our theory lessons learned
bull Spectrum of pregnancy intention
bull Closing the disparity gap
bull Maternal outcomes
Next steps Prototype testing
bull Partnership with Detroit WIN Network and
HFHS
bull Co-design community intervention based on
interventions
bull 9-month prototype test
A Historical Reflection 1995-2016
1995 BTS Improving Maternal and
Neonatal Outcomes
bull Reducing Cesarean Section Rates
National Congress
Innovation (2003-2006) IMPACT (2006 ndash 2009) Perinatal Improvement
Community (2009 ndash 2014)
Expert Meeting (2003)
Developed idealized Design
Concept Diagram (2004)
Oxytocin Bundles Meeting
(2004)
Phase I Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2004)
Phase II Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2005)
Initial Change Package for OB (2006)
100000 Lives Campaign ndash
mentor netw ork (OB) (2006)
AIM Reduce birth trauma and risk by innovative design and testing by
February 2006
AIM Reduction of Harm Outcome Measure- Perinatal Adverse Events
AIM Reducing Harm Improving Care Supporting Health
IHI Perinatal Focused Work Timeline
White Paper (2006)
Launch Perinatal IMPACT Community (2006)
IHI Perinatal Web and Action (2006)
Catholic Healthcare West (2006)
Mayo System (2006)
Developed Building Blocks (2007)
Developed Initial Driver Diagram (2007)
Oxytocin High Alert Medication Deep Dive (2007)
Vacuum Bundle Developed (2008 )
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance
bull Wales 1000 Lives Campaign (2007)
bull Northern Ireland (2009)
IMPACT Ended (82009)
PIC initiated (92009)
International Teams joined Community (2009-2014)
Expedition Improving Perinatal Safety -- The Oxytocin Bundle (2010)
Faculty Team expanded PIC Hospital Members (2010)
Innovation Workgroup Second Stage Safety (2010)
Labor Deep Dive Tool (2010)
Revised Driver Diagram -Leadership (2010)
Advanced Bundles developed (2010)
Birth Outcomes Initiative - Louisiana (2010 -2012)
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance (Scotland amp
Denmark) (2011)
Faculty Team expanded Patient Representative (2011)
ACOG Toolkit (IHI oxytocin bundles) (2012)
IHI How to Guide Obstetrical Adverse Events (2012)
Obstetrical Sepsis Summit (2012)
NCC Uses Oxytocin Bundles for Certif ication (2012)
Deep Dive Structure Tool (2012)
IHI HEN HRET (Perinatal Content) (2012)
Louisiana Cohort (20132014)
Louisiana HEN merged w LA Cohort (2013)
Maternity Action Team (2013)
Retired Original Oxytocin Bundles ((2013)
Expedition Treating Maternal Sepsis (2013)
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
Late Preterm Infant (2013)
Innovation Neonatal Workgroup (2013)
Innovation Nulliparous Workgroup (2013)
CMS Louisiana Performance Improvement Grant (2013)
Maternity Action Playbook Leadership Driver amp Change
Package (2014)
Critical Incident Coaching (2014)
IHI Perinatal Community Care Bundle Sequencing
Elective Induction Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
Augmentation Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
IHI Oxytocin Bundles (2004)
bull GAgt39 weeks
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Category I-normal)
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Exclusion of Category III)
Basic Oxytocin Bundles Defined as patient who receives
Oxytocin for elective induction or augmentation Focus on
eliminating elective delivery prior to 39 weeks adoption
of team definition and reliable execution of component
indicators
IHI Advanced Bundles (2010) Accept 39 weeks as minimal GA for elective delivery Bishop score of more than 8 in the nulliparous patient the probability of vaginal delivery after labor induction is similar to spontaneous laborFocus moves to pharmacologic or mechanical initiation of labor- no longer focused on (just) Oxytocin Evidence Based Gestational dating is core
Additional Bundles developed and or
supported by faculty and Innovation
Workgroups
Advanced Non-Medically
Indicated Bundle
Advanced Indicated Induction Bundle
Advanced Augmentation Bundle
Vacuum Bundle (2008)
Defined Patient without a
medical indication for delivery
bull Confi rmation of term
gestation
bull Pelvic Assessment Favorable
Bishop Score (locally
defined)
bull Recognition and
management of
compl ications of induction
method (including
tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I-
normal)
Defined Patient with a medical
indication for induction
bull Acceptable medical indication for
labor induction documented
(locally defined)
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
compl ications of induction method
(including tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management of
FHR Status
Exclus ion of Category III FHR
Defined
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management
of tachysystole
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I -
normal)
bull (Exclusion of Category II I)
(May include amniotomy nipple
s timulation acupuncture and
Oxytocin)
bull Alternative labor s trategies
bull Prepared patient
bull High probability of success
bull Maximum application time and
number of pop-offs predetermined
bull Exit s trategy available
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
bull NRP appropriate (vigorous infant 37
-41+ w eeks gestation
bull Identif ication of risk of
infectionsepsis
bull Delayed cord clamping
bull Breastfeeding Initiation
bull Delayed bath- (for f irst hour of life
bull Align Unit Measures Strategies Projects w ith Org Strategy and Goals (Clinical
Patient Exp Financial and Workforce)
bull Channel Senior Leadership Attention and Develop Unit Leadership
bull Engage Physicians
bull Build Improvement Capacity and Provide Resources for Improvement bull Establish a Just Culture
bull Develop a Competent Trained and Available Workforce
bull Establish Credentialing of Core Competency and Training for all Providers
bull Use ACOGAWHONN Guidelines for Documentation and Staff ing
bull Develop a Consumer Advisory Board
Perinatal
Leadership
bull Execute care that meets national standards (Implement Bundles Perinatal Core
Processes)
bull Develop standard processes and protocols for response to obstetrical emergency
bull Design care process improvement based on trigger tool analysis event detection
sentinel event bull Standardize administration of high alert medications ndash oxytocin magnesium sulfate
epidurals
bull Create an environment that Supports Care and Healing
bull Consider segments of population and design reliable and appropriate processes for
specif ic needs and characteristics of this segment of the population
Reliable
Design Reduce Variation
bull Adopt common language and interpretation of EFM w ith multi-disciplinary training ie
NICHD criteria
bull Implement techniques for effective communication ie SBAR
bull Establish reliable techniques for handoffs
bull Establish Team Response Protocols bull Implement Huddles
bull Design Simulations
Effective
Peer Teamwork
bull Design processes to support partnership in care betw een provider and patient and
family
bull Develop w ith patient a customized interdisciplinary shared care plan
bull Design care process improvement based on information obtained about patient
experience (interviews assessments focus groups surveys) bull Include patients and families on design and improvement teams
bull Communicate openly and honestly w ith family and patients at regular intervals
bull Do w hat you say mean w hat you do
Respectful
Patient Partnership
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births
Zero incidence of
elective deliveries prior to confirmation
of fetal maturity
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or
Compliance greater than 90
Improve organizational
culture of safety survey scores in
Perinatal units by 25
100 of participating
teams will have documentation of Patient amp
Family Centered Care
Perinatal Community
Reducing Harm Improving Care
Supporting Healing
Reduce Harm Improve Care
Support Healing
Respectful Patient
Partnership
Reliable Design amp Reduce Variation
Effective
Peer Teamwork
Perinatal Leadership
Perinatal Improvement Community
Measurement Strategy
Collaborative Perinatal Goals
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births Zero incidence of elective deliveries prior to confirmation of fetal maturity (39 weeks)
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or Compliance great than 90 Improve organizational culture of safety survey scores in Perinatal units by 25
100 of the participating teams will have documentation of Patient amp Family Centered Care
Perinatal Care Measurement Strategy Required Measures Optional Measures
Annual Bi-annual
Structure Assessments
Monthly Outcome amp Structure
Measures
Initial Weekly or Monthly
Process Measures
Advanced Weekly or Monthly
Outcome and Process Measures
Outcome Balance or Process
Measures
Oxytocin Deep Dive
Perinatal Harm
Augmentation Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Vacuum Bundle CompositeCompliance
Transfer to Higher Level of Care (A) (B)
Time Between Elective Deliveries
39 wks
Elective Induction Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Augmentation
Bundle Composite Compliance
Patient and Family Satisfaction
Culture of Safety Survey
Documentation Reliability
(InfantMother)
Elective Delivery Rate prior to 39 completed weeks
gestation (TJC PC01 )
Augmentation Induction Monthly Bundle
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Elective Induction Bundle
Composite Compliance
Time Between (Decision - Incision)
Prophylactic Antibiotic in C-section
Labor Deep Dive
Cesarean rate for low-risk first birth women
(TJC PC02) Elective Induction Monthly Bundle Compliance
(Oxytocin)
Advanced Indicated Induction
Bundle Composite Compliance
Birth trauma rate measures (NQF)
Incidence of episiotomy (NQF)
Patient and Family Centered Care
Gestational Age Reliability (Test
Measure)
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Public health message- Dubai
lt The Public Health amp Safety
Department has initiated a public service campaign to warn children amp pregnant women from entering
cafes with creative messages hung on all the cafes doors in Dubai
The messages will be addressed by the fetus or children amp aimed towards the parents smoking is
your choice not mine
lt Door-sized posters publicising the campaign have been plastered on cafe entrances across the
emirates where people go to smoke the hookah pipes
IHIrsquos Innovation Work
AIM
To develop a population approach to reduce preterm births among Medicaid (women receiving
insurance through the government supported plan)
recipient women
Methods
bull Evidence scan
bull 50+ expert interviewssite visits across 20 states to
identify best practices
bull Expert design meeting
bull Validate theory of change and bundle of interventions
bull Prototype test bundle of interventions with one community
Risk factors for preterm birth
Clinical risk factors bull A previous history of pre-term birth bull Multiple gestation bull Short interval between pregnancies bull Cervical length measured during
pregnancy bull Age (lt16 or gt35) bull Positive fetal fibronectin bull Hypertension bull BMI (underweight or overweight) bull Renal disease bull Anti-phospholipid syndrome bull Antenatal depression bull Genital tract infections bull Preterm rupture of membranes bull Antepartum haemorrhage bull Other
Socialstructural risk factors
bull Late care enrollmentinadequate prenatal care
bull Tobacco use
bull Maternal income
bull Maternal education
bull Maternal stress
bull Marital status
bull Unstable housing
bull Other
Clinical and social interventions to reduce
preterm birth Clinical interventions
bull Progesterone for women with a singleton
gestation and a history of spontaneous PTB
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a
singleton gestation and current short cervix in the second trimester
bull Consideration of cerclage for women with a
singleton gestation and a history of a prior
spontaneous PTB and a current short cervix particularly if the length is lt15 mm
bull Elimination of elective inductions before 39 weeks
bull Evidence-based management of other major
risk factors (eg preeclampsia
management pharmacotherapy to address heavy smoking)
bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Other
Socio-clinical interventions
More evidence
bull Group antenatal care
bull Some home visiting models
bull Psychosocial interventions to promote smoking cessation
bull Midwife-led continuity models
bull Nutrition counseling
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Other
Theory A Population Approach
1 To reduce rates of
preterm birth among
pregnant w omen
2 To improve health and
health care outcomes for pregnant w omen and
new borns
3 To decrease per capita
costs of care
Identify and engage
pregnant w omen at
high risk for preterm
birth and poor birth
outcomes
Provide evidence-
based population-
specif ic perinatal care
bull Evaluate clinical risk factors
bull Evaluate
socialstructural factors
bull Engage vulnerable pregnant women
bull Reliably deliver evidence-based
medical
interventions bull Implement socio-
clinical and community-based
interventions which
best address the risk factors for the local
population
Integrate community
resources to support
pregnant w omen
bull Partner with local
organizations working to serve this
population bull Identify resources to
build and grow care
models
Secondary Drivers Primary Drivers
Aim
Although this design session will focus on strategies to reduce preterm birth any population health system to Integrate Maternal health and Care will include the following components
bull Learning how to apply the emerging evidence to correctly identify when labor begins bull No routine non-medically indicated inductions bull No routine separation of mother and baby regardless if the birth occurs vaginally or by cesarean and bull Providing support to women and their family members through the postpartum and discharge period
Interventions
bull Home visiting models bull Peer support modelsGroup prenatal Care
bull Prenatal substance abuse programs (eg
for opiate addiction) bull Pregnancy Medical Home elements
bull Interventions to promote smoking cessation bull Nutrition counseling
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a singleton gestation and history of
spontaneous PTB or current short cervix in
the second trimester bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Use of LARCsother postpartum contraception
Bundle of Interventions
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Peer support (including group prenatal care)
bull Integration of substance use treatment and perinatal care
bull Shared decision making around pregnancy intention
Testing our theory lessons learned
bull Spectrum of pregnancy intention
bull Closing the disparity gap
bull Maternal outcomes
Next steps Prototype testing
bull Partnership with Detroit WIN Network and
HFHS
bull Co-design community intervention based on
interventions
bull 9-month prototype test
A Historical Reflection 1995-2016
1995 BTS Improving Maternal and
Neonatal Outcomes
bull Reducing Cesarean Section Rates
National Congress
Innovation (2003-2006) IMPACT (2006 ndash 2009) Perinatal Improvement
Community (2009 ndash 2014)
Expert Meeting (2003)
Developed idealized Design
Concept Diagram (2004)
Oxytocin Bundles Meeting
(2004)
Phase I Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2004)
Phase II Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2005)
Initial Change Package for OB (2006)
100000 Lives Campaign ndash
mentor netw ork (OB) (2006)
AIM Reduce birth trauma and risk by innovative design and testing by
February 2006
AIM Reduction of Harm Outcome Measure- Perinatal Adverse Events
AIM Reducing Harm Improving Care Supporting Health
IHI Perinatal Focused Work Timeline
White Paper (2006)
Launch Perinatal IMPACT Community (2006)
IHI Perinatal Web and Action (2006)
Catholic Healthcare West (2006)
Mayo System (2006)
Developed Building Blocks (2007)
Developed Initial Driver Diagram (2007)
Oxytocin High Alert Medication Deep Dive (2007)
Vacuum Bundle Developed (2008 )
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance
bull Wales 1000 Lives Campaign (2007)
bull Northern Ireland (2009)
IMPACT Ended (82009)
PIC initiated (92009)
International Teams joined Community (2009-2014)
Expedition Improving Perinatal Safety -- The Oxytocin Bundle (2010)
Faculty Team expanded PIC Hospital Members (2010)
Innovation Workgroup Second Stage Safety (2010)
Labor Deep Dive Tool (2010)
Revised Driver Diagram -Leadership (2010)
Advanced Bundles developed (2010)
Birth Outcomes Initiative - Louisiana (2010 -2012)
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance (Scotland amp
Denmark) (2011)
Faculty Team expanded Patient Representative (2011)
ACOG Toolkit (IHI oxytocin bundles) (2012)
IHI How to Guide Obstetrical Adverse Events (2012)
Obstetrical Sepsis Summit (2012)
NCC Uses Oxytocin Bundles for Certif ication (2012)
Deep Dive Structure Tool (2012)
IHI HEN HRET (Perinatal Content) (2012)
Louisiana Cohort (20132014)
Louisiana HEN merged w LA Cohort (2013)
Maternity Action Team (2013)
Retired Original Oxytocin Bundles ((2013)
Expedition Treating Maternal Sepsis (2013)
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
Late Preterm Infant (2013)
Innovation Neonatal Workgroup (2013)
Innovation Nulliparous Workgroup (2013)
CMS Louisiana Performance Improvement Grant (2013)
Maternity Action Playbook Leadership Driver amp Change
Package (2014)
Critical Incident Coaching (2014)
IHI Perinatal Community Care Bundle Sequencing
Elective Induction Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
Augmentation Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
IHI Oxytocin Bundles (2004)
bull GAgt39 weeks
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Category I-normal)
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Exclusion of Category III)
Basic Oxytocin Bundles Defined as patient who receives
Oxytocin for elective induction or augmentation Focus on
eliminating elective delivery prior to 39 weeks adoption
of team definition and reliable execution of component
indicators
IHI Advanced Bundles (2010) Accept 39 weeks as minimal GA for elective delivery Bishop score of more than 8 in the nulliparous patient the probability of vaginal delivery after labor induction is similar to spontaneous laborFocus moves to pharmacologic or mechanical initiation of labor- no longer focused on (just) Oxytocin Evidence Based Gestational dating is core
Additional Bundles developed and or
supported by faculty and Innovation
Workgroups
Advanced Non-Medically
Indicated Bundle
Advanced Indicated Induction Bundle
Advanced Augmentation Bundle
Vacuum Bundle (2008)
Defined Patient without a
medical indication for delivery
bull Confi rmation of term
gestation
bull Pelvic Assessment Favorable
Bishop Score (locally
defined)
bull Recognition and
management of
compl ications of induction
method (including
tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I-
normal)
Defined Patient with a medical
indication for induction
bull Acceptable medical indication for
labor induction documented
(locally defined)
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
compl ications of induction method
(including tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management of
FHR Status
Exclus ion of Category III FHR
Defined
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management
of tachysystole
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I -
normal)
bull (Exclusion of Category II I)
(May include amniotomy nipple
s timulation acupuncture and
Oxytocin)
bull Alternative labor s trategies
bull Prepared patient
bull High probability of success
bull Maximum application time and
number of pop-offs predetermined
bull Exit s trategy available
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
bull NRP appropriate (vigorous infant 37
-41+ w eeks gestation
bull Identif ication of risk of
infectionsepsis
bull Delayed cord clamping
bull Breastfeeding Initiation
bull Delayed bath- (for f irst hour of life
bull Align Unit Measures Strategies Projects w ith Org Strategy and Goals (Clinical
Patient Exp Financial and Workforce)
bull Channel Senior Leadership Attention and Develop Unit Leadership
bull Engage Physicians
bull Build Improvement Capacity and Provide Resources for Improvement bull Establish a Just Culture
bull Develop a Competent Trained and Available Workforce
bull Establish Credentialing of Core Competency and Training for all Providers
bull Use ACOGAWHONN Guidelines for Documentation and Staff ing
bull Develop a Consumer Advisory Board
Perinatal
Leadership
bull Execute care that meets national standards (Implement Bundles Perinatal Core
Processes)
bull Develop standard processes and protocols for response to obstetrical emergency
bull Design care process improvement based on trigger tool analysis event detection
sentinel event bull Standardize administration of high alert medications ndash oxytocin magnesium sulfate
epidurals
bull Create an environment that Supports Care and Healing
bull Consider segments of population and design reliable and appropriate processes for
specif ic needs and characteristics of this segment of the population
Reliable
Design Reduce Variation
bull Adopt common language and interpretation of EFM w ith multi-disciplinary training ie
NICHD criteria
bull Implement techniques for effective communication ie SBAR
bull Establish reliable techniques for handoffs
bull Establish Team Response Protocols bull Implement Huddles
bull Design Simulations
Effective
Peer Teamwork
bull Design processes to support partnership in care betw een provider and patient and
family
bull Develop w ith patient a customized interdisciplinary shared care plan
bull Design care process improvement based on information obtained about patient
experience (interviews assessments focus groups surveys) bull Include patients and families on design and improvement teams
bull Communicate openly and honestly w ith family and patients at regular intervals
bull Do w hat you say mean w hat you do
Respectful
Patient Partnership
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births
Zero incidence of
elective deliveries prior to confirmation
of fetal maturity
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or
Compliance greater than 90
Improve organizational
culture of safety survey scores in
Perinatal units by 25
100 of participating
teams will have documentation of Patient amp
Family Centered Care
Perinatal Community
Reducing Harm Improving Care
Supporting Healing
Reduce Harm Improve Care
Support Healing
Respectful Patient
Partnership
Reliable Design amp Reduce Variation
Effective
Peer Teamwork
Perinatal Leadership
Perinatal Improvement Community
Measurement Strategy
Collaborative Perinatal Goals
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births Zero incidence of elective deliveries prior to confirmation of fetal maturity (39 weeks)
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or Compliance great than 90 Improve organizational culture of safety survey scores in Perinatal units by 25
100 of the participating teams will have documentation of Patient amp Family Centered Care
Perinatal Care Measurement Strategy Required Measures Optional Measures
Annual Bi-annual
Structure Assessments
Monthly Outcome amp Structure
Measures
Initial Weekly or Monthly
Process Measures
Advanced Weekly or Monthly
Outcome and Process Measures
Outcome Balance or Process
Measures
Oxytocin Deep Dive
Perinatal Harm
Augmentation Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Vacuum Bundle CompositeCompliance
Transfer to Higher Level of Care (A) (B)
Time Between Elective Deliveries
39 wks
Elective Induction Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Augmentation
Bundle Composite Compliance
Patient and Family Satisfaction
Culture of Safety Survey
Documentation Reliability
(InfantMother)
Elective Delivery Rate prior to 39 completed weeks
gestation (TJC PC01 )
Augmentation Induction Monthly Bundle
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Elective Induction Bundle
Composite Compliance
Time Between (Decision - Incision)
Prophylactic Antibiotic in C-section
Labor Deep Dive
Cesarean rate for low-risk first birth women
(TJC PC02) Elective Induction Monthly Bundle Compliance
(Oxytocin)
Advanced Indicated Induction
Bundle Composite Compliance
Birth trauma rate measures (NQF)
Incidence of episiotomy (NQF)
Patient and Family Centered Care
Gestational Age Reliability (Test
Measure)
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
IHIrsquos Innovation Work
AIM
To develop a population approach to reduce preterm births among Medicaid (women receiving
insurance through the government supported plan)
recipient women
Methods
bull Evidence scan
bull 50+ expert interviewssite visits across 20 states to
identify best practices
bull Expert design meeting
bull Validate theory of change and bundle of interventions
bull Prototype test bundle of interventions with one community
Risk factors for preterm birth
Clinical risk factors bull A previous history of pre-term birth bull Multiple gestation bull Short interval between pregnancies bull Cervical length measured during
pregnancy bull Age (lt16 or gt35) bull Positive fetal fibronectin bull Hypertension bull BMI (underweight or overweight) bull Renal disease bull Anti-phospholipid syndrome bull Antenatal depression bull Genital tract infections bull Preterm rupture of membranes bull Antepartum haemorrhage bull Other
Socialstructural risk factors
bull Late care enrollmentinadequate prenatal care
bull Tobacco use
bull Maternal income
bull Maternal education
bull Maternal stress
bull Marital status
bull Unstable housing
bull Other
Clinical and social interventions to reduce
preterm birth Clinical interventions
bull Progesterone for women with a singleton
gestation and a history of spontaneous PTB
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a
singleton gestation and current short cervix in the second trimester
bull Consideration of cerclage for women with a
singleton gestation and a history of a prior
spontaneous PTB and a current short cervix particularly if the length is lt15 mm
bull Elimination of elective inductions before 39 weeks
bull Evidence-based management of other major
risk factors (eg preeclampsia
management pharmacotherapy to address heavy smoking)
bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Other
Socio-clinical interventions
More evidence
bull Group antenatal care
bull Some home visiting models
bull Psychosocial interventions to promote smoking cessation
bull Midwife-led continuity models
bull Nutrition counseling
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Other
Theory A Population Approach
1 To reduce rates of
preterm birth among
pregnant w omen
2 To improve health and
health care outcomes for pregnant w omen and
new borns
3 To decrease per capita
costs of care
Identify and engage
pregnant w omen at
high risk for preterm
birth and poor birth
outcomes
Provide evidence-
based population-
specif ic perinatal care
bull Evaluate clinical risk factors
bull Evaluate
socialstructural factors
bull Engage vulnerable pregnant women
bull Reliably deliver evidence-based
medical
interventions bull Implement socio-
clinical and community-based
interventions which
best address the risk factors for the local
population
Integrate community
resources to support
pregnant w omen
bull Partner with local
organizations working to serve this
population bull Identify resources to
build and grow care
models
Secondary Drivers Primary Drivers
Aim
Although this design session will focus on strategies to reduce preterm birth any population health system to Integrate Maternal health and Care will include the following components
bull Learning how to apply the emerging evidence to correctly identify when labor begins bull No routine non-medically indicated inductions bull No routine separation of mother and baby regardless if the birth occurs vaginally or by cesarean and bull Providing support to women and their family members through the postpartum and discharge period
Interventions
bull Home visiting models bull Peer support modelsGroup prenatal Care
bull Prenatal substance abuse programs (eg
for opiate addiction) bull Pregnancy Medical Home elements
bull Interventions to promote smoking cessation bull Nutrition counseling
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a singleton gestation and history of
spontaneous PTB or current short cervix in
the second trimester bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Use of LARCsother postpartum contraception
Bundle of Interventions
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Peer support (including group prenatal care)
bull Integration of substance use treatment and perinatal care
bull Shared decision making around pregnancy intention
Testing our theory lessons learned
bull Spectrum of pregnancy intention
bull Closing the disparity gap
bull Maternal outcomes
Next steps Prototype testing
bull Partnership with Detroit WIN Network and
HFHS
bull Co-design community intervention based on
interventions
bull 9-month prototype test
A Historical Reflection 1995-2016
1995 BTS Improving Maternal and
Neonatal Outcomes
bull Reducing Cesarean Section Rates
National Congress
Innovation (2003-2006) IMPACT (2006 ndash 2009) Perinatal Improvement
Community (2009 ndash 2014)
Expert Meeting (2003)
Developed idealized Design
Concept Diagram (2004)
Oxytocin Bundles Meeting
(2004)
Phase I Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2004)
Phase II Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2005)
Initial Change Package for OB (2006)
100000 Lives Campaign ndash
mentor netw ork (OB) (2006)
AIM Reduce birth trauma and risk by innovative design and testing by
February 2006
AIM Reduction of Harm Outcome Measure- Perinatal Adverse Events
AIM Reducing Harm Improving Care Supporting Health
IHI Perinatal Focused Work Timeline
White Paper (2006)
Launch Perinatal IMPACT Community (2006)
IHI Perinatal Web and Action (2006)
Catholic Healthcare West (2006)
Mayo System (2006)
Developed Building Blocks (2007)
Developed Initial Driver Diagram (2007)
Oxytocin High Alert Medication Deep Dive (2007)
Vacuum Bundle Developed (2008 )
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance
bull Wales 1000 Lives Campaign (2007)
bull Northern Ireland (2009)
IMPACT Ended (82009)
PIC initiated (92009)
International Teams joined Community (2009-2014)
Expedition Improving Perinatal Safety -- The Oxytocin Bundle (2010)
Faculty Team expanded PIC Hospital Members (2010)
Innovation Workgroup Second Stage Safety (2010)
Labor Deep Dive Tool (2010)
Revised Driver Diagram -Leadership (2010)
Advanced Bundles developed (2010)
Birth Outcomes Initiative - Louisiana (2010 -2012)
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance (Scotland amp
Denmark) (2011)
Faculty Team expanded Patient Representative (2011)
ACOG Toolkit (IHI oxytocin bundles) (2012)
IHI How to Guide Obstetrical Adverse Events (2012)
Obstetrical Sepsis Summit (2012)
NCC Uses Oxytocin Bundles for Certif ication (2012)
Deep Dive Structure Tool (2012)
IHI HEN HRET (Perinatal Content) (2012)
Louisiana Cohort (20132014)
Louisiana HEN merged w LA Cohort (2013)
Maternity Action Team (2013)
Retired Original Oxytocin Bundles ((2013)
Expedition Treating Maternal Sepsis (2013)
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
Late Preterm Infant (2013)
Innovation Neonatal Workgroup (2013)
Innovation Nulliparous Workgroup (2013)
CMS Louisiana Performance Improvement Grant (2013)
Maternity Action Playbook Leadership Driver amp Change
Package (2014)
Critical Incident Coaching (2014)
IHI Perinatal Community Care Bundle Sequencing
Elective Induction Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
Augmentation Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
IHI Oxytocin Bundles (2004)
bull GAgt39 weeks
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Category I-normal)
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Exclusion of Category III)
Basic Oxytocin Bundles Defined as patient who receives
Oxytocin for elective induction or augmentation Focus on
eliminating elective delivery prior to 39 weeks adoption
of team definition and reliable execution of component
indicators
IHI Advanced Bundles (2010) Accept 39 weeks as minimal GA for elective delivery Bishop score of more than 8 in the nulliparous patient the probability of vaginal delivery after labor induction is similar to spontaneous laborFocus moves to pharmacologic or mechanical initiation of labor- no longer focused on (just) Oxytocin Evidence Based Gestational dating is core
Additional Bundles developed and or
supported by faculty and Innovation
Workgroups
Advanced Non-Medically
Indicated Bundle
Advanced Indicated Induction Bundle
Advanced Augmentation Bundle
Vacuum Bundle (2008)
Defined Patient without a
medical indication for delivery
bull Confi rmation of term
gestation
bull Pelvic Assessment Favorable
Bishop Score (locally
defined)
bull Recognition and
management of
compl ications of induction
method (including
tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I-
normal)
Defined Patient with a medical
indication for induction
bull Acceptable medical indication for
labor induction documented
(locally defined)
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
compl ications of induction method
(including tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management of
FHR Status
Exclus ion of Category III FHR
Defined
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management
of tachysystole
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I -
normal)
bull (Exclusion of Category II I)
(May include amniotomy nipple
s timulation acupuncture and
Oxytocin)
bull Alternative labor s trategies
bull Prepared patient
bull High probability of success
bull Maximum application time and
number of pop-offs predetermined
bull Exit s trategy available
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
bull NRP appropriate (vigorous infant 37
-41+ w eeks gestation
bull Identif ication of risk of
infectionsepsis
bull Delayed cord clamping
bull Breastfeeding Initiation
bull Delayed bath- (for f irst hour of life
bull Align Unit Measures Strategies Projects w ith Org Strategy and Goals (Clinical
Patient Exp Financial and Workforce)
bull Channel Senior Leadership Attention and Develop Unit Leadership
bull Engage Physicians
bull Build Improvement Capacity and Provide Resources for Improvement bull Establish a Just Culture
bull Develop a Competent Trained and Available Workforce
bull Establish Credentialing of Core Competency and Training for all Providers
bull Use ACOGAWHONN Guidelines for Documentation and Staff ing
bull Develop a Consumer Advisory Board
Perinatal
Leadership
bull Execute care that meets national standards (Implement Bundles Perinatal Core
Processes)
bull Develop standard processes and protocols for response to obstetrical emergency
bull Design care process improvement based on trigger tool analysis event detection
sentinel event bull Standardize administration of high alert medications ndash oxytocin magnesium sulfate
epidurals
bull Create an environment that Supports Care and Healing
bull Consider segments of population and design reliable and appropriate processes for
specif ic needs and characteristics of this segment of the population
Reliable
Design Reduce Variation
bull Adopt common language and interpretation of EFM w ith multi-disciplinary training ie
NICHD criteria
bull Implement techniques for effective communication ie SBAR
bull Establish reliable techniques for handoffs
bull Establish Team Response Protocols bull Implement Huddles
bull Design Simulations
Effective
Peer Teamwork
bull Design processes to support partnership in care betw een provider and patient and
family
bull Develop w ith patient a customized interdisciplinary shared care plan
bull Design care process improvement based on information obtained about patient
experience (interviews assessments focus groups surveys) bull Include patients and families on design and improvement teams
bull Communicate openly and honestly w ith family and patients at regular intervals
bull Do w hat you say mean w hat you do
Respectful
Patient Partnership
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births
Zero incidence of
elective deliveries prior to confirmation
of fetal maturity
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or
Compliance greater than 90
Improve organizational
culture of safety survey scores in
Perinatal units by 25
100 of participating
teams will have documentation of Patient amp
Family Centered Care
Perinatal Community
Reducing Harm Improving Care
Supporting Healing
Reduce Harm Improve Care
Support Healing
Respectful Patient
Partnership
Reliable Design amp Reduce Variation
Effective
Peer Teamwork
Perinatal Leadership
Perinatal Improvement Community
Measurement Strategy
Collaborative Perinatal Goals
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births Zero incidence of elective deliveries prior to confirmation of fetal maturity (39 weeks)
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or Compliance great than 90 Improve organizational culture of safety survey scores in Perinatal units by 25
100 of the participating teams will have documentation of Patient amp Family Centered Care
Perinatal Care Measurement Strategy Required Measures Optional Measures
Annual Bi-annual
Structure Assessments
Monthly Outcome amp Structure
Measures
Initial Weekly or Monthly
Process Measures
Advanced Weekly or Monthly
Outcome and Process Measures
Outcome Balance or Process
Measures
Oxytocin Deep Dive
Perinatal Harm
Augmentation Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Vacuum Bundle CompositeCompliance
Transfer to Higher Level of Care (A) (B)
Time Between Elective Deliveries
39 wks
Elective Induction Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Augmentation
Bundle Composite Compliance
Patient and Family Satisfaction
Culture of Safety Survey
Documentation Reliability
(InfantMother)
Elective Delivery Rate prior to 39 completed weeks
gestation (TJC PC01 )
Augmentation Induction Monthly Bundle
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Elective Induction Bundle
Composite Compliance
Time Between (Decision - Incision)
Prophylactic Antibiotic in C-section
Labor Deep Dive
Cesarean rate for low-risk first birth women
(TJC PC02) Elective Induction Monthly Bundle Compliance
(Oxytocin)
Advanced Indicated Induction
Bundle Composite Compliance
Birth trauma rate measures (NQF)
Incidence of episiotomy (NQF)
Patient and Family Centered Care
Gestational Age Reliability (Test
Measure)
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Methods
bull Evidence scan
bull 50+ expert interviewssite visits across 20 states to
identify best practices
bull Expert design meeting
bull Validate theory of change and bundle of interventions
bull Prototype test bundle of interventions with one community
Risk factors for preterm birth
Clinical risk factors bull A previous history of pre-term birth bull Multiple gestation bull Short interval between pregnancies bull Cervical length measured during
pregnancy bull Age (lt16 or gt35) bull Positive fetal fibronectin bull Hypertension bull BMI (underweight or overweight) bull Renal disease bull Anti-phospholipid syndrome bull Antenatal depression bull Genital tract infections bull Preterm rupture of membranes bull Antepartum haemorrhage bull Other
Socialstructural risk factors
bull Late care enrollmentinadequate prenatal care
bull Tobacco use
bull Maternal income
bull Maternal education
bull Maternal stress
bull Marital status
bull Unstable housing
bull Other
Clinical and social interventions to reduce
preterm birth Clinical interventions
bull Progesterone for women with a singleton
gestation and a history of spontaneous PTB
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a
singleton gestation and current short cervix in the second trimester
bull Consideration of cerclage for women with a
singleton gestation and a history of a prior
spontaneous PTB and a current short cervix particularly if the length is lt15 mm
bull Elimination of elective inductions before 39 weeks
bull Evidence-based management of other major
risk factors (eg preeclampsia
management pharmacotherapy to address heavy smoking)
bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Other
Socio-clinical interventions
More evidence
bull Group antenatal care
bull Some home visiting models
bull Psychosocial interventions to promote smoking cessation
bull Midwife-led continuity models
bull Nutrition counseling
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Other
Theory A Population Approach
1 To reduce rates of
preterm birth among
pregnant w omen
2 To improve health and
health care outcomes for pregnant w omen and
new borns
3 To decrease per capita
costs of care
Identify and engage
pregnant w omen at
high risk for preterm
birth and poor birth
outcomes
Provide evidence-
based population-
specif ic perinatal care
bull Evaluate clinical risk factors
bull Evaluate
socialstructural factors
bull Engage vulnerable pregnant women
bull Reliably deliver evidence-based
medical
interventions bull Implement socio-
clinical and community-based
interventions which
best address the risk factors for the local
population
Integrate community
resources to support
pregnant w omen
bull Partner with local
organizations working to serve this
population bull Identify resources to
build and grow care
models
Secondary Drivers Primary Drivers
Aim
Although this design session will focus on strategies to reduce preterm birth any population health system to Integrate Maternal health and Care will include the following components
bull Learning how to apply the emerging evidence to correctly identify when labor begins bull No routine non-medically indicated inductions bull No routine separation of mother and baby regardless if the birth occurs vaginally or by cesarean and bull Providing support to women and their family members through the postpartum and discharge period
Interventions
bull Home visiting models bull Peer support modelsGroup prenatal Care
bull Prenatal substance abuse programs (eg
for opiate addiction) bull Pregnancy Medical Home elements
bull Interventions to promote smoking cessation bull Nutrition counseling
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a singleton gestation and history of
spontaneous PTB or current short cervix in
the second trimester bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Use of LARCsother postpartum contraception
Bundle of Interventions
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Peer support (including group prenatal care)
bull Integration of substance use treatment and perinatal care
bull Shared decision making around pregnancy intention
Testing our theory lessons learned
bull Spectrum of pregnancy intention
bull Closing the disparity gap
bull Maternal outcomes
Next steps Prototype testing
bull Partnership with Detroit WIN Network and
HFHS
bull Co-design community intervention based on
interventions
bull 9-month prototype test
A Historical Reflection 1995-2016
1995 BTS Improving Maternal and
Neonatal Outcomes
bull Reducing Cesarean Section Rates
National Congress
Innovation (2003-2006) IMPACT (2006 ndash 2009) Perinatal Improvement
Community (2009 ndash 2014)
Expert Meeting (2003)
Developed idealized Design
Concept Diagram (2004)
Oxytocin Bundles Meeting
(2004)
Phase I Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2004)
Phase II Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2005)
Initial Change Package for OB (2006)
100000 Lives Campaign ndash
mentor netw ork (OB) (2006)
AIM Reduce birth trauma and risk by innovative design and testing by
February 2006
AIM Reduction of Harm Outcome Measure- Perinatal Adverse Events
AIM Reducing Harm Improving Care Supporting Health
IHI Perinatal Focused Work Timeline
White Paper (2006)
Launch Perinatal IMPACT Community (2006)
IHI Perinatal Web and Action (2006)
Catholic Healthcare West (2006)
Mayo System (2006)
Developed Building Blocks (2007)
Developed Initial Driver Diagram (2007)
Oxytocin High Alert Medication Deep Dive (2007)
Vacuum Bundle Developed (2008 )
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance
bull Wales 1000 Lives Campaign (2007)
bull Northern Ireland (2009)
IMPACT Ended (82009)
PIC initiated (92009)
International Teams joined Community (2009-2014)
Expedition Improving Perinatal Safety -- The Oxytocin Bundle (2010)
Faculty Team expanded PIC Hospital Members (2010)
Innovation Workgroup Second Stage Safety (2010)
Labor Deep Dive Tool (2010)
Revised Driver Diagram -Leadership (2010)
Advanced Bundles developed (2010)
Birth Outcomes Initiative - Louisiana (2010 -2012)
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance (Scotland amp
Denmark) (2011)
Faculty Team expanded Patient Representative (2011)
ACOG Toolkit (IHI oxytocin bundles) (2012)
IHI How to Guide Obstetrical Adverse Events (2012)
Obstetrical Sepsis Summit (2012)
NCC Uses Oxytocin Bundles for Certif ication (2012)
Deep Dive Structure Tool (2012)
IHI HEN HRET (Perinatal Content) (2012)
Louisiana Cohort (20132014)
Louisiana HEN merged w LA Cohort (2013)
Maternity Action Team (2013)
Retired Original Oxytocin Bundles ((2013)
Expedition Treating Maternal Sepsis (2013)
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
Late Preterm Infant (2013)
Innovation Neonatal Workgroup (2013)
Innovation Nulliparous Workgroup (2013)
CMS Louisiana Performance Improvement Grant (2013)
Maternity Action Playbook Leadership Driver amp Change
Package (2014)
Critical Incident Coaching (2014)
IHI Perinatal Community Care Bundle Sequencing
Elective Induction Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
Augmentation Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
IHI Oxytocin Bundles (2004)
bull GAgt39 weeks
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Category I-normal)
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Exclusion of Category III)
Basic Oxytocin Bundles Defined as patient who receives
Oxytocin for elective induction or augmentation Focus on
eliminating elective delivery prior to 39 weeks adoption
of team definition and reliable execution of component
indicators
IHI Advanced Bundles (2010) Accept 39 weeks as minimal GA for elective delivery Bishop score of more than 8 in the nulliparous patient the probability of vaginal delivery after labor induction is similar to spontaneous laborFocus moves to pharmacologic or mechanical initiation of labor- no longer focused on (just) Oxytocin Evidence Based Gestational dating is core
Additional Bundles developed and or
supported by faculty and Innovation
Workgroups
Advanced Non-Medically
Indicated Bundle
Advanced Indicated Induction Bundle
Advanced Augmentation Bundle
Vacuum Bundle (2008)
Defined Patient without a
medical indication for delivery
bull Confi rmation of term
gestation
bull Pelvic Assessment Favorable
Bishop Score (locally
defined)
bull Recognition and
management of
compl ications of induction
method (including
tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I-
normal)
Defined Patient with a medical
indication for induction
bull Acceptable medical indication for
labor induction documented
(locally defined)
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
compl ications of induction method
(including tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management of
FHR Status
Exclus ion of Category III FHR
Defined
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management
of tachysystole
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I -
normal)
bull (Exclusion of Category II I)
(May include amniotomy nipple
s timulation acupuncture and
Oxytocin)
bull Alternative labor s trategies
bull Prepared patient
bull High probability of success
bull Maximum application time and
number of pop-offs predetermined
bull Exit s trategy available
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
bull NRP appropriate (vigorous infant 37
-41+ w eeks gestation
bull Identif ication of risk of
infectionsepsis
bull Delayed cord clamping
bull Breastfeeding Initiation
bull Delayed bath- (for f irst hour of life
bull Align Unit Measures Strategies Projects w ith Org Strategy and Goals (Clinical
Patient Exp Financial and Workforce)
bull Channel Senior Leadership Attention and Develop Unit Leadership
bull Engage Physicians
bull Build Improvement Capacity and Provide Resources for Improvement bull Establish a Just Culture
bull Develop a Competent Trained and Available Workforce
bull Establish Credentialing of Core Competency and Training for all Providers
bull Use ACOGAWHONN Guidelines for Documentation and Staff ing
bull Develop a Consumer Advisory Board
Perinatal
Leadership
bull Execute care that meets national standards (Implement Bundles Perinatal Core
Processes)
bull Develop standard processes and protocols for response to obstetrical emergency
bull Design care process improvement based on trigger tool analysis event detection
sentinel event bull Standardize administration of high alert medications ndash oxytocin magnesium sulfate
epidurals
bull Create an environment that Supports Care and Healing
bull Consider segments of population and design reliable and appropriate processes for
specif ic needs and characteristics of this segment of the population
Reliable
Design Reduce Variation
bull Adopt common language and interpretation of EFM w ith multi-disciplinary training ie
NICHD criteria
bull Implement techniques for effective communication ie SBAR
bull Establish reliable techniques for handoffs
bull Establish Team Response Protocols bull Implement Huddles
bull Design Simulations
Effective
Peer Teamwork
bull Design processes to support partnership in care betw een provider and patient and
family
bull Develop w ith patient a customized interdisciplinary shared care plan
bull Design care process improvement based on information obtained about patient
experience (interviews assessments focus groups surveys) bull Include patients and families on design and improvement teams
bull Communicate openly and honestly w ith family and patients at regular intervals
bull Do w hat you say mean w hat you do
Respectful
Patient Partnership
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births
Zero incidence of
elective deliveries prior to confirmation
of fetal maturity
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or
Compliance greater than 90
Improve organizational
culture of safety survey scores in
Perinatal units by 25
100 of participating
teams will have documentation of Patient amp
Family Centered Care
Perinatal Community
Reducing Harm Improving Care
Supporting Healing
Reduce Harm Improve Care
Support Healing
Respectful Patient
Partnership
Reliable Design amp Reduce Variation
Effective
Peer Teamwork
Perinatal Leadership
Perinatal Improvement Community
Measurement Strategy
Collaborative Perinatal Goals
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births Zero incidence of elective deliveries prior to confirmation of fetal maturity (39 weeks)
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or Compliance great than 90 Improve organizational culture of safety survey scores in Perinatal units by 25
100 of the participating teams will have documentation of Patient amp Family Centered Care
Perinatal Care Measurement Strategy Required Measures Optional Measures
Annual Bi-annual
Structure Assessments
Monthly Outcome amp Structure
Measures
Initial Weekly or Monthly
Process Measures
Advanced Weekly or Monthly
Outcome and Process Measures
Outcome Balance or Process
Measures
Oxytocin Deep Dive
Perinatal Harm
Augmentation Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Vacuum Bundle CompositeCompliance
Transfer to Higher Level of Care (A) (B)
Time Between Elective Deliveries
39 wks
Elective Induction Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Augmentation
Bundle Composite Compliance
Patient and Family Satisfaction
Culture of Safety Survey
Documentation Reliability
(InfantMother)
Elective Delivery Rate prior to 39 completed weeks
gestation (TJC PC01 )
Augmentation Induction Monthly Bundle
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Elective Induction Bundle
Composite Compliance
Time Between (Decision - Incision)
Prophylactic Antibiotic in C-section
Labor Deep Dive
Cesarean rate for low-risk first birth women
(TJC PC02) Elective Induction Monthly Bundle Compliance
(Oxytocin)
Advanced Indicated Induction
Bundle Composite Compliance
Birth trauma rate measures (NQF)
Incidence of episiotomy (NQF)
Patient and Family Centered Care
Gestational Age Reliability (Test
Measure)
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Risk factors for preterm birth
Clinical risk factors bull A previous history of pre-term birth bull Multiple gestation bull Short interval between pregnancies bull Cervical length measured during
pregnancy bull Age (lt16 or gt35) bull Positive fetal fibronectin bull Hypertension bull BMI (underweight or overweight) bull Renal disease bull Anti-phospholipid syndrome bull Antenatal depression bull Genital tract infections bull Preterm rupture of membranes bull Antepartum haemorrhage bull Other
Socialstructural risk factors
bull Late care enrollmentinadequate prenatal care
bull Tobacco use
bull Maternal income
bull Maternal education
bull Maternal stress
bull Marital status
bull Unstable housing
bull Other
Clinical and social interventions to reduce
preterm birth Clinical interventions
bull Progesterone for women with a singleton
gestation and a history of spontaneous PTB
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a
singleton gestation and current short cervix in the second trimester
bull Consideration of cerclage for women with a
singleton gestation and a history of a prior
spontaneous PTB and a current short cervix particularly if the length is lt15 mm
bull Elimination of elective inductions before 39 weeks
bull Evidence-based management of other major
risk factors (eg preeclampsia
management pharmacotherapy to address heavy smoking)
bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Other
Socio-clinical interventions
More evidence
bull Group antenatal care
bull Some home visiting models
bull Psychosocial interventions to promote smoking cessation
bull Midwife-led continuity models
bull Nutrition counseling
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Other
Theory A Population Approach
1 To reduce rates of
preterm birth among
pregnant w omen
2 To improve health and
health care outcomes for pregnant w omen and
new borns
3 To decrease per capita
costs of care
Identify and engage
pregnant w omen at
high risk for preterm
birth and poor birth
outcomes
Provide evidence-
based population-
specif ic perinatal care
bull Evaluate clinical risk factors
bull Evaluate
socialstructural factors
bull Engage vulnerable pregnant women
bull Reliably deliver evidence-based
medical
interventions bull Implement socio-
clinical and community-based
interventions which
best address the risk factors for the local
population
Integrate community
resources to support
pregnant w omen
bull Partner with local
organizations working to serve this
population bull Identify resources to
build and grow care
models
Secondary Drivers Primary Drivers
Aim
Although this design session will focus on strategies to reduce preterm birth any population health system to Integrate Maternal health and Care will include the following components
bull Learning how to apply the emerging evidence to correctly identify when labor begins bull No routine non-medically indicated inductions bull No routine separation of mother and baby regardless if the birth occurs vaginally or by cesarean and bull Providing support to women and their family members through the postpartum and discharge period
Interventions
bull Home visiting models bull Peer support modelsGroup prenatal Care
bull Prenatal substance abuse programs (eg
for opiate addiction) bull Pregnancy Medical Home elements
bull Interventions to promote smoking cessation bull Nutrition counseling
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a singleton gestation and history of
spontaneous PTB or current short cervix in
the second trimester bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Use of LARCsother postpartum contraception
Bundle of Interventions
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Peer support (including group prenatal care)
bull Integration of substance use treatment and perinatal care
bull Shared decision making around pregnancy intention
Testing our theory lessons learned
bull Spectrum of pregnancy intention
bull Closing the disparity gap
bull Maternal outcomes
Next steps Prototype testing
bull Partnership with Detroit WIN Network and
HFHS
bull Co-design community intervention based on
interventions
bull 9-month prototype test
A Historical Reflection 1995-2016
1995 BTS Improving Maternal and
Neonatal Outcomes
bull Reducing Cesarean Section Rates
National Congress
Innovation (2003-2006) IMPACT (2006 ndash 2009) Perinatal Improvement
Community (2009 ndash 2014)
Expert Meeting (2003)
Developed idealized Design
Concept Diagram (2004)
Oxytocin Bundles Meeting
(2004)
Phase I Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2004)
Phase II Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2005)
Initial Change Package for OB (2006)
100000 Lives Campaign ndash
mentor netw ork (OB) (2006)
AIM Reduce birth trauma and risk by innovative design and testing by
February 2006
AIM Reduction of Harm Outcome Measure- Perinatal Adverse Events
AIM Reducing Harm Improving Care Supporting Health
IHI Perinatal Focused Work Timeline
White Paper (2006)
Launch Perinatal IMPACT Community (2006)
IHI Perinatal Web and Action (2006)
Catholic Healthcare West (2006)
Mayo System (2006)
Developed Building Blocks (2007)
Developed Initial Driver Diagram (2007)
Oxytocin High Alert Medication Deep Dive (2007)
Vacuum Bundle Developed (2008 )
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance
bull Wales 1000 Lives Campaign (2007)
bull Northern Ireland (2009)
IMPACT Ended (82009)
PIC initiated (92009)
International Teams joined Community (2009-2014)
Expedition Improving Perinatal Safety -- The Oxytocin Bundle (2010)
Faculty Team expanded PIC Hospital Members (2010)
Innovation Workgroup Second Stage Safety (2010)
Labor Deep Dive Tool (2010)
Revised Driver Diagram -Leadership (2010)
Advanced Bundles developed (2010)
Birth Outcomes Initiative - Louisiana (2010 -2012)
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance (Scotland amp
Denmark) (2011)
Faculty Team expanded Patient Representative (2011)
ACOG Toolkit (IHI oxytocin bundles) (2012)
IHI How to Guide Obstetrical Adverse Events (2012)
Obstetrical Sepsis Summit (2012)
NCC Uses Oxytocin Bundles for Certif ication (2012)
Deep Dive Structure Tool (2012)
IHI HEN HRET (Perinatal Content) (2012)
Louisiana Cohort (20132014)
Louisiana HEN merged w LA Cohort (2013)
Maternity Action Team (2013)
Retired Original Oxytocin Bundles ((2013)
Expedition Treating Maternal Sepsis (2013)
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
Late Preterm Infant (2013)
Innovation Neonatal Workgroup (2013)
Innovation Nulliparous Workgroup (2013)
CMS Louisiana Performance Improvement Grant (2013)
Maternity Action Playbook Leadership Driver amp Change
Package (2014)
Critical Incident Coaching (2014)
IHI Perinatal Community Care Bundle Sequencing
Elective Induction Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
Augmentation Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
IHI Oxytocin Bundles (2004)
bull GAgt39 weeks
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Category I-normal)
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Exclusion of Category III)
Basic Oxytocin Bundles Defined as patient who receives
Oxytocin for elective induction or augmentation Focus on
eliminating elective delivery prior to 39 weeks adoption
of team definition and reliable execution of component
indicators
IHI Advanced Bundles (2010) Accept 39 weeks as minimal GA for elective delivery Bishop score of more than 8 in the nulliparous patient the probability of vaginal delivery after labor induction is similar to spontaneous laborFocus moves to pharmacologic or mechanical initiation of labor- no longer focused on (just) Oxytocin Evidence Based Gestational dating is core
Additional Bundles developed and or
supported by faculty and Innovation
Workgroups
Advanced Non-Medically
Indicated Bundle
Advanced Indicated Induction Bundle
Advanced Augmentation Bundle
Vacuum Bundle (2008)
Defined Patient without a
medical indication for delivery
bull Confi rmation of term
gestation
bull Pelvic Assessment Favorable
Bishop Score (locally
defined)
bull Recognition and
management of
compl ications of induction
method (including
tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I-
normal)
Defined Patient with a medical
indication for induction
bull Acceptable medical indication for
labor induction documented
(locally defined)
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
compl ications of induction method
(including tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management of
FHR Status
Exclus ion of Category III FHR
Defined
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management
of tachysystole
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I -
normal)
bull (Exclusion of Category II I)
(May include amniotomy nipple
s timulation acupuncture and
Oxytocin)
bull Alternative labor s trategies
bull Prepared patient
bull High probability of success
bull Maximum application time and
number of pop-offs predetermined
bull Exit s trategy available
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
bull NRP appropriate (vigorous infant 37
-41+ w eeks gestation
bull Identif ication of risk of
infectionsepsis
bull Delayed cord clamping
bull Breastfeeding Initiation
bull Delayed bath- (for f irst hour of life
bull Align Unit Measures Strategies Projects w ith Org Strategy and Goals (Clinical
Patient Exp Financial and Workforce)
bull Channel Senior Leadership Attention and Develop Unit Leadership
bull Engage Physicians
bull Build Improvement Capacity and Provide Resources for Improvement bull Establish a Just Culture
bull Develop a Competent Trained and Available Workforce
bull Establish Credentialing of Core Competency and Training for all Providers
bull Use ACOGAWHONN Guidelines for Documentation and Staff ing
bull Develop a Consumer Advisory Board
Perinatal
Leadership
bull Execute care that meets national standards (Implement Bundles Perinatal Core
Processes)
bull Develop standard processes and protocols for response to obstetrical emergency
bull Design care process improvement based on trigger tool analysis event detection
sentinel event bull Standardize administration of high alert medications ndash oxytocin magnesium sulfate
epidurals
bull Create an environment that Supports Care and Healing
bull Consider segments of population and design reliable and appropriate processes for
specif ic needs and characteristics of this segment of the population
Reliable
Design Reduce Variation
bull Adopt common language and interpretation of EFM w ith multi-disciplinary training ie
NICHD criteria
bull Implement techniques for effective communication ie SBAR
bull Establish reliable techniques for handoffs
bull Establish Team Response Protocols bull Implement Huddles
bull Design Simulations
Effective
Peer Teamwork
bull Design processes to support partnership in care betw een provider and patient and
family
bull Develop w ith patient a customized interdisciplinary shared care plan
bull Design care process improvement based on information obtained about patient
experience (interviews assessments focus groups surveys) bull Include patients and families on design and improvement teams
bull Communicate openly and honestly w ith family and patients at regular intervals
bull Do w hat you say mean w hat you do
Respectful
Patient Partnership
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births
Zero incidence of
elective deliveries prior to confirmation
of fetal maturity
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or
Compliance greater than 90
Improve organizational
culture of safety survey scores in
Perinatal units by 25
100 of participating
teams will have documentation of Patient amp
Family Centered Care
Perinatal Community
Reducing Harm Improving Care
Supporting Healing
Reduce Harm Improve Care
Support Healing
Respectful Patient
Partnership
Reliable Design amp Reduce Variation
Effective
Peer Teamwork
Perinatal Leadership
Perinatal Improvement Community
Measurement Strategy
Collaborative Perinatal Goals
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births Zero incidence of elective deliveries prior to confirmation of fetal maturity (39 weeks)
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or Compliance great than 90 Improve organizational culture of safety survey scores in Perinatal units by 25
100 of the participating teams will have documentation of Patient amp Family Centered Care
Perinatal Care Measurement Strategy Required Measures Optional Measures
Annual Bi-annual
Structure Assessments
Monthly Outcome amp Structure
Measures
Initial Weekly or Monthly
Process Measures
Advanced Weekly or Monthly
Outcome and Process Measures
Outcome Balance or Process
Measures
Oxytocin Deep Dive
Perinatal Harm
Augmentation Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Vacuum Bundle CompositeCompliance
Transfer to Higher Level of Care (A) (B)
Time Between Elective Deliveries
39 wks
Elective Induction Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Augmentation
Bundle Composite Compliance
Patient and Family Satisfaction
Culture of Safety Survey
Documentation Reliability
(InfantMother)
Elective Delivery Rate prior to 39 completed weeks
gestation (TJC PC01 )
Augmentation Induction Monthly Bundle
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Elective Induction Bundle
Composite Compliance
Time Between (Decision - Incision)
Prophylactic Antibiotic in C-section
Labor Deep Dive
Cesarean rate for low-risk first birth women
(TJC PC02) Elective Induction Monthly Bundle Compliance
(Oxytocin)
Advanced Indicated Induction
Bundle Composite Compliance
Birth trauma rate measures (NQF)
Incidence of episiotomy (NQF)
Patient and Family Centered Care
Gestational Age Reliability (Test
Measure)
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Clinical and social interventions to reduce
preterm birth Clinical interventions
bull Progesterone for women with a singleton
gestation and a history of spontaneous PTB
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a
singleton gestation and current short cervix in the second trimester
bull Consideration of cerclage for women with a
singleton gestation and a history of a prior
spontaneous PTB and a current short cervix particularly if the length is lt15 mm
bull Elimination of elective inductions before 39 weeks
bull Evidence-based management of other major
risk factors (eg preeclampsia
management pharmacotherapy to address heavy smoking)
bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Other
Socio-clinical interventions
More evidence
bull Group antenatal care
bull Some home visiting models
bull Psychosocial interventions to promote smoking cessation
bull Midwife-led continuity models
bull Nutrition counseling
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Other
Theory A Population Approach
1 To reduce rates of
preterm birth among
pregnant w omen
2 To improve health and
health care outcomes for pregnant w omen and
new borns
3 To decrease per capita
costs of care
Identify and engage
pregnant w omen at
high risk for preterm
birth and poor birth
outcomes
Provide evidence-
based population-
specif ic perinatal care
bull Evaluate clinical risk factors
bull Evaluate
socialstructural factors
bull Engage vulnerable pregnant women
bull Reliably deliver evidence-based
medical
interventions bull Implement socio-
clinical and community-based
interventions which
best address the risk factors for the local
population
Integrate community
resources to support
pregnant w omen
bull Partner with local
organizations working to serve this
population bull Identify resources to
build and grow care
models
Secondary Drivers Primary Drivers
Aim
Although this design session will focus on strategies to reduce preterm birth any population health system to Integrate Maternal health and Care will include the following components
bull Learning how to apply the emerging evidence to correctly identify when labor begins bull No routine non-medically indicated inductions bull No routine separation of mother and baby regardless if the birth occurs vaginally or by cesarean and bull Providing support to women and their family members through the postpartum and discharge period
Interventions
bull Home visiting models bull Peer support modelsGroup prenatal Care
bull Prenatal substance abuse programs (eg
for opiate addiction) bull Pregnancy Medical Home elements
bull Interventions to promote smoking cessation bull Nutrition counseling
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a singleton gestation and history of
spontaneous PTB or current short cervix in
the second trimester bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Use of LARCsother postpartum contraception
Bundle of Interventions
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Peer support (including group prenatal care)
bull Integration of substance use treatment and perinatal care
bull Shared decision making around pregnancy intention
Testing our theory lessons learned
bull Spectrum of pregnancy intention
bull Closing the disparity gap
bull Maternal outcomes
Next steps Prototype testing
bull Partnership with Detroit WIN Network and
HFHS
bull Co-design community intervention based on
interventions
bull 9-month prototype test
A Historical Reflection 1995-2016
1995 BTS Improving Maternal and
Neonatal Outcomes
bull Reducing Cesarean Section Rates
National Congress
Innovation (2003-2006) IMPACT (2006 ndash 2009) Perinatal Improvement
Community (2009 ndash 2014)
Expert Meeting (2003)
Developed idealized Design
Concept Diagram (2004)
Oxytocin Bundles Meeting
(2004)
Phase I Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2004)
Phase II Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2005)
Initial Change Package for OB (2006)
100000 Lives Campaign ndash
mentor netw ork (OB) (2006)
AIM Reduce birth trauma and risk by innovative design and testing by
February 2006
AIM Reduction of Harm Outcome Measure- Perinatal Adverse Events
AIM Reducing Harm Improving Care Supporting Health
IHI Perinatal Focused Work Timeline
White Paper (2006)
Launch Perinatal IMPACT Community (2006)
IHI Perinatal Web and Action (2006)
Catholic Healthcare West (2006)
Mayo System (2006)
Developed Building Blocks (2007)
Developed Initial Driver Diagram (2007)
Oxytocin High Alert Medication Deep Dive (2007)
Vacuum Bundle Developed (2008 )
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance
bull Wales 1000 Lives Campaign (2007)
bull Northern Ireland (2009)
IMPACT Ended (82009)
PIC initiated (92009)
International Teams joined Community (2009-2014)
Expedition Improving Perinatal Safety -- The Oxytocin Bundle (2010)
Faculty Team expanded PIC Hospital Members (2010)
Innovation Workgroup Second Stage Safety (2010)
Labor Deep Dive Tool (2010)
Revised Driver Diagram -Leadership (2010)
Advanced Bundles developed (2010)
Birth Outcomes Initiative - Louisiana (2010 -2012)
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance (Scotland amp
Denmark) (2011)
Faculty Team expanded Patient Representative (2011)
ACOG Toolkit (IHI oxytocin bundles) (2012)
IHI How to Guide Obstetrical Adverse Events (2012)
Obstetrical Sepsis Summit (2012)
NCC Uses Oxytocin Bundles for Certif ication (2012)
Deep Dive Structure Tool (2012)
IHI HEN HRET (Perinatal Content) (2012)
Louisiana Cohort (20132014)
Louisiana HEN merged w LA Cohort (2013)
Maternity Action Team (2013)
Retired Original Oxytocin Bundles ((2013)
Expedition Treating Maternal Sepsis (2013)
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
Late Preterm Infant (2013)
Innovation Neonatal Workgroup (2013)
Innovation Nulliparous Workgroup (2013)
CMS Louisiana Performance Improvement Grant (2013)
Maternity Action Playbook Leadership Driver amp Change
Package (2014)
Critical Incident Coaching (2014)
IHI Perinatal Community Care Bundle Sequencing
Elective Induction Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
Augmentation Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
IHI Oxytocin Bundles (2004)
bull GAgt39 weeks
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Category I-normal)
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Exclusion of Category III)
Basic Oxytocin Bundles Defined as patient who receives
Oxytocin for elective induction or augmentation Focus on
eliminating elective delivery prior to 39 weeks adoption
of team definition and reliable execution of component
indicators
IHI Advanced Bundles (2010) Accept 39 weeks as minimal GA for elective delivery Bishop score of more than 8 in the nulliparous patient the probability of vaginal delivery after labor induction is similar to spontaneous laborFocus moves to pharmacologic or mechanical initiation of labor- no longer focused on (just) Oxytocin Evidence Based Gestational dating is core
Additional Bundles developed and or
supported by faculty and Innovation
Workgroups
Advanced Non-Medically
Indicated Bundle
Advanced Indicated Induction Bundle
Advanced Augmentation Bundle
Vacuum Bundle (2008)
Defined Patient without a
medical indication for delivery
bull Confi rmation of term
gestation
bull Pelvic Assessment Favorable
Bishop Score (locally
defined)
bull Recognition and
management of
compl ications of induction
method (including
tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I-
normal)
Defined Patient with a medical
indication for induction
bull Acceptable medical indication for
labor induction documented
(locally defined)
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
compl ications of induction method
(including tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management of
FHR Status
Exclus ion of Category III FHR
Defined
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management
of tachysystole
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I -
normal)
bull (Exclusion of Category II I)
(May include amniotomy nipple
s timulation acupuncture and
Oxytocin)
bull Alternative labor s trategies
bull Prepared patient
bull High probability of success
bull Maximum application time and
number of pop-offs predetermined
bull Exit s trategy available
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
bull NRP appropriate (vigorous infant 37
-41+ w eeks gestation
bull Identif ication of risk of
infectionsepsis
bull Delayed cord clamping
bull Breastfeeding Initiation
bull Delayed bath- (for f irst hour of life
bull Align Unit Measures Strategies Projects w ith Org Strategy and Goals (Clinical
Patient Exp Financial and Workforce)
bull Channel Senior Leadership Attention and Develop Unit Leadership
bull Engage Physicians
bull Build Improvement Capacity and Provide Resources for Improvement bull Establish a Just Culture
bull Develop a Competent Trained and Available Workforce
bull Establish Credentialing of Core Competency and Training for all Providers
bull Use ACOGAWHONN Guidelines for Documentation and Staff ing
bull Develop a Consumer Advisory Board
Perinatal
Leadership
bull Execute care that meets national standards (Implement Bundles Perinatal Core
Processes)
bull Develop standard processes and protocols for response to obstetrical emergency
bull Design care process improvement based on trigger tool analysis event detection
sentinel event bull Standardize administration of high alert medications ndash oxytocin magnesium sulfate
epidurals
bull Create an environment that Supports Care and Healing
bull Consider segments of population and design reliable and appropriate processes for
specif ic needs and characteristics of this segment of the population
Reliable
Design Reduce Variation
bull Adopt common language and interpretation of EFM w ith multi-disciplinary training ie
NICHD criteria
bull Implement techniques for effective communication ie SBAR
bull Establish reliable techniques for handoffs
bull Establish Team Response Protocols bull Implement Huddles
bull Design Simulations
Effective
Peer Teamwork
bull Design processes to support partnership in care betw een provider and patient and
family
bull Develop w ith patient a customized interdisciplinary shared care plan
bull Design care process improvement based on information obtained about patient
experience (interviews assessments focus groups surveys) bull Include patients and families on design and improvement teams
bull Communicate openly and honestly w ith family and patients at regular intervals
bull Do w hat you say mean w hat you do
Respectful
Patient Partnership
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births
Zero incidence of
elective deliveries prior to confirmation
of fetal maturity
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or
Compliance greater than 90
Improve organizational
culture of safety survey scores in
Perinatal units by 25
100 of participating
teams will have documentation of Patient amp
Family Centered Care
Perinatal Community
Reducing Harm Improving Care
Supporting Healing
Reduce Harm Improve Care
Support Healing
Respectful Patient
Partnership
Reliable Design amp Reduce Variation
Effective
Peer Teamwork
Perinatal Leadership
Perinatal Improvement Community
Measurement Strategy
Collaborative Perinatal Goals
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births Zero incidence of elective deliveries prior to confirmation of fetal maturity (39 weeks)
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or Compliance great than 90 Improve organizational culture of safety survey scores in Perinatal units by 25
100 of the participating teams will have documentation of Patient amp Family Centered Care
Perinatal Care Measurement Strategy Required Measures Optional Measures
Annual Bi-annual
Structure Assessments
Monthly Outcome amp Structure
Measures
Initial Weekly or Monthly
Process Measures
Advanced Weekly or Monthly
Outcome and Process Measures
Outcome Balance or Process
Measures
Oxytocin Deep Dive
Perinatal Harm
Augmentation Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Vacuum Bundle CompositeCompliance
Transfer to Higher Level of Care (A) (B)
Time Between Elective Deliveries
39 wks
Elective Induction Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Augmentation
Bundle Composite Compliance
Patient and Family Satisfaction
Culture of Safety Survey
Documentation Reliability
(InfantMother)
Elective Delivery Rate prior to 39 completed weeks
gestation (TJC PC01 )
Augmentation Induction Monthly Bundle
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Elective Induction Bundle
Composite Compliance
Time Between (Decision - Incision)
Prophylactic Antibiotic in C-section
Labor Deep Dive
Cesarean rate for low-risk first birth women
(TJC PC02) Elective Induction Monthly Bundle Compliance
(Oxytocin)
Advanced Indicated Induction
Bundle Composite Compliance
Birth trauma rate measures (NQF)
Incidence of episiotomy (NQF)
Patient and Family Centered Care
Gestational Age Reliability (Test
Measure)
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Theory A Population Approach
1 To reduce rates of
preterm birth among
pregnant w omen
2 To improve health and
health care outcomes for pregnant w omen and
new borns
3 To decrease per capita
costs of care
Identify and engage
pregnant w omen at
high risk for preterm
birth and poor birth
outcomes
Provide evidence-
based population-
specif ic perinatal care
bull Evaluate clinical risk factors
bull Evaluate
socialstructural factors
bull Engage vulnerable pregnant women
bull Reliably deliver evidence-based
medical
interventions bull Implement socio-
clinical and community-based
interventions which
best address the risk factors for the local
population
Integrate community
resources to support
pregnant w omen
bull Partner with local
organizations working to serve this
population bull Identify resources to
build and grow care
models
Secondary Drivers Primary Drivers
Aim
Although this design session will focus on strategies to reduce preterm birth any population health system to Integrate Maternal health and Care will include the following components
bull Learning how to apply the emerging evidence to correctly identify when labor begins bull No routine non-medically indicated inductions bull No routine separation of mother and baby regardless if the birth occurs vaginally or by cesarean and bull Providing support to women and their family members through the postpartum and discharge period
Interventions
bull Home visiting models bull Peer support modelsGroup prenatal Care
bull Prenatal substance abuse programs (eg
for opiate addiction) bull Pregnancy Medical Home elements
bull Interventions to promote smoking cessation bull Nutrition counseling
bull Vaginal progesterone for women with a singleton gestation and history of
spontaneous PTB or current short cervix in
the second trimester bull Judicious use of fertility treatment
bull Use of LARCsother postpartum contraception
Bundle of Interventions
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Peer support (including group prenatal care)
bull Integration of substance use treatment and perinatal care
bull Shared decision making around pregnancy intention
Testing our theory lessons learned
bull Spectrum of pregnancy intention
bull Closing the disparity gap
bull Maternal outcomes
Next steps Prototype testing
bull Partnership with Detroit WIN Network and
HFHS
bull Co-design community intervention based on
interventions
bull 9-month prototype test
A Historical Reflection 1995-2016
1995 BTS Improving Maternal and
Neonatal Outcomes
bull Reducing Cesarean Section Rates
National Congress
Innovation (2003-2006) IMPACT (2006 ndash 2009) Perinatal Improvement
Community (2009 ndash 2014)
Expert Meeting (2003)
Developed idealized Design
Concept Diagram (2004)
Oxytocin Bundles Meeting
(2004)
Phase I Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2004)
Phase II Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2005)
Initial Change Package for OB (2006)
100000 Lives Campaign ndash
mentor netw ork (OB) (2006)
AIM Reduce birth trauma and risk by innovative design and testing by
February 2006
AIM Reduction of Harm Outcome Measure- Perinatal Adverse Events
AIM Reducing Harm Improving Care Supporting Health
IHI Perinatal Focused Work Timeline
White Paper (2006)
Launch Perinatal IMPACT Community (2006)
IHI Perinatal Web and Action (2006)
Catholic Healthcare West (2006)
Mayo System (2006)
Developed Building Blocks (2007)
Developed Initial Driver Diagram (2007)
Oxytocin High Alert Medication Deep Dive (2007)
Vacuum Bundle Developed (2008 )
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance
bull Wales 1000 Lives Campaign (2007)
bull Northern Ireland (2009)
IMPACT Ended (82009)
PIC initiated (92009)
International Teams joined Community (2009-2014)
Expedition Improving Perinatal Safety -- The Oxytocin Bundle (2010)
Faculty Team expanded PIC Hospital Members (2010)
Innovation Workgroup Second Stage Safety (2010)
Labor Deep Dive Tool (2010)
Revised Driver Diagram -Leadership (2010)
Advanced Bundles developed (2010)
Birth Outcomes Initiative - Louisiana (2010 -2012)
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance (Scotland amp
Denmark) (2011)
Faculty Team expanded Patient Representative (2011)
ACOG Toolkit (IHI oxytocin bundles) (2012)
IHI How to Guide Obstetrical Adverse Events (2012)
Obstetrical Sepsis Summit (2012)
NCC Uses Oxytocin Bundles for Certif ication (2012)
Deep Dive Structure Tool (2012)
IHI HEN HRET (Perinatal Content) (2012)
Louisiana Cohort (20132014)
Louisiana HEN merged w LA Cohort (2013)
Maternity Action Team (2013)
Retired Original Oxytocin Bundles ((2013)
Expedition Treating Maternal Sepsis (2013)
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
Late Preterm Infant (2013)
Innovation Neonatal Workgroup (2013)
Innovation Nulliparous Workgroup (2013)
CMS Louisiana Performance Improvement Grant (2013)
Maternity Action Playbook Leadership Driver amp Change
Package (2014)
Critical Incident Coaching (2014)
IHI Perinatal Community Care Bundle Sequencing
Elective Induction Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
Augmentation Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
IHI Oxytocin Bundles (2004)
bull GAgt39 weeks
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Category I-normal)
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Exclusion of Category III)
Basic Oxytocin Bundles Defined as patient who receives
Oxytocin for elective induction or augmentation Focus on
eliminating elective delivery prior to 39 weeks adoption
of team definition and reliable execution of component
indicators
IHI Advanced Bundles (2010) Accept 39 weeks as minimal GA for elective delivery Bishop score of more than 8 in the nulliparous patient the probability of vaginal delivery after labor induction is similar to spontaneous laborFocus moves to pharmacologic or mechanical initiation of labor- no longer focused on (just) Oxytocin Evidence Based Gestational dating is core
Additional Bundles developed and or
supported by faculty and Innovation
Workgroups
Advanced Non-Medically
Indicated Bundle
Advanced Indicated Induction Bundle
Advanced Augmentation Bundle
Vacuum Bundle (2008)
Defined Patient without a
medical indication for delivery
bull Confi rmation of term
gestation
bull Pelvic Assessment Favorable
Bishop Score (locally
defined)
bull Recognition and
management of
compl ications of induction
method (including
tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I-
normal)
Defined Patient with a medical
indication for induction
bull Acceptable medical indication for
labor induction documented
(locally defined)
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
compl ications of induction method
(including tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management of
FHR Status
Exclus ion of Category III FHR
Defined
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management
of tachysystole
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I -
normal)
bull (Exclusion of Category II I)
(May include amniotomy nipple
s timulation acupuncture and
Oxytocin)
bull Alternative labor s trategies
bull Prepared patient
bull High probability of success
bull Maximum application time and
number of pop-offs predetermined
bull Exit s trategy available
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
bull NRP appropriate (vigorous infant 37
-41+ w eeks gestation
bull Identif ication of risk of
infectionsepsis
bull Delayed cord clamping
bull Breastfeeding Initiation
bull Delayed bath- (for f irst hour of life
bull Align Unit Measures Strategies Projects w ith Org Strategy and Goals (Clinical
Patient Exp Financial and Workforce)
bull Channel Senior Leadership Attention and Develop Unit Leadership
bull Engage Physicians
bull Build Improvement Capacity and Provide Resources for Improvement bull Establish a Just Culture
bull Develop a Competent Trained and Available Workforce
bull Establish Credentialing of Core Competency and Training for all Providers
bull Use ACOGAWHONN Guidelines for Documentation and Staff ing
bull Develop a Consumer Advisory Board
Perinatal
Leadership
bull Execute care that meets national standards (Implement Bundles Perinatal Core
Processes)
bull Develop standard processes and protocols for response to obstetrical emergency
bull Design care process improvement based on trigger tool analysis event detection
sentinel event bull Standardize administration of high alert medications ndash oxytocin magnesium sulfate
epidurals
bull Create an environment that Supports Care and Healing
bull Consider segments of population and design reliable and appropriate processes for
specif ic needs and characteristics of this segment of the population
Reliable
Design Reduce Variation
bull Adopt common language and interpretation of EFM w ith multi-disciplinary training ie
NICHD criteria
bull Implement techniques for effective communication ie SBAR
bull Establish reliable techniques for handoffs
bull Establish Team Response Protocols bull Implement Huddles
bull Design Simulations
Effective
Peer Teamwork
bull Design processes to support partnership in care betw een provider and patient and
family
bull Develop w ith patient a customized interdisciplinary shared care plan
bull Design care process improvement based on information obtained about patient
experience (interviews assessments focus groups surveys) bull Include patients and families on design and improvement teams
bull Communicate openly and honestly w ith family and patients at regular intervals
bull Do w hat you say mean w hat you do
Respectful
Patient Partnership
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births
Zero incidence of
elective deliveries prior to confirmation
of fetal maturity
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or
Compliance greater than 90
Improve organizational
culture of safety survey scores in
Perinatal units by 25
100 of participating
teams will have documentation of Patient amp
Family Centered Care
Perinatal Community
Reducing Harm Improving Care
Supporting Healing
Reduce Harm Improve Care
Support Healing
Respectful Patient
Partnership
Reliable Design amp Reduce Variation
Effective
Peer Teamwork
Perinatal Leadership
Perinatal Improvement Community
Measurement Strategy
Collaborative Perinatal Goals
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births Zero incidence of elective deliveries prior to confirmation of fetal maturity (39 weeks)
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or Compliance great than 90 Improve organizational culture of safety survey scores in Perinatal units by 25
100 of the participating teams will have documentation of Patient amp Family Centered Care
Perinatal Care Measurement Strategy Required Measures Optional Measures
Annual Bi-annual
Structure Assessments
Monthly Outcome amp Structure
Measures
Initial Weekly or Monthly
Process Measures
Advanced Weekly or Monthly
Outcome and Process Measures
Outcome Balance or Process
Measures
Oxytocin Deep Dive
Perinatal Harm
Augmentation Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Vacuum Bundle CompositeCompliance
Transfer to Higher Level of Care (A) (B)
Time Between Elective Deliveries
39 wks
Elective Induction Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Augmentation
Bundle Composite Compliance
Patient and Family Satisfaction
Culture of Safety Survey
Documentation Reliability
(InfantMother)
Elective Delivery Rate prior to 39 completed weeks
gestation (TJC PC01 )
Augmentation Induction Monthly Bundle
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Elective Induction Bundle
Composite Compliance
Time Between (Decision - Incision)
Prophylactic Antibiotic in C-section
Labor Deep Dive
Cesarean rate for low-risk first birth women
(TJC PC02) Elective Induction Monthly Bundle Compliance
(Oxytocin)
Advanced Indicated Induction
Bundle Composite Compliance
Birth trauma rate measures (NQF)
Incidence of episiotomy (NQF)
Patient and Family Centered Care
Gestational Age Reliability (Test
Measure)
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Bundle of Interventions
bull Maternity medical home model
bull Peer support (including group prenatal care)
bull Integration of substance use treatment and perinatal care
bull Shared decision making around pregnancy intention
Testing our theory lessons learned
bull Spectrum of pregnancy intention
bull Closing the disparity gap
bull Maternal outcomes
Next steps Prototype testing
bull Partnership with Detroit WIN Network and
HFHS
bull Co-design community intervention based on
interventions
bull 9-month prototype test
A Historical Reflection 1995-2016
1995 BTS Improving Maternal and
Neonatal Outcomes
bull Reducing Cesarean Section Rates
National Congress
Innovation (2003-2006) IMPACT (2006 ndash 2009) Perinatal Improvement
Community (2009 ndash 2014)
Expert Meeting (2003)
Developed idealized Design
Concept Diagram (2004)
Oxytocin Bundles Meeting
(2004)
Phase I Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2004)
Phase II Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2005)
Initial Change Package for OB (2006)
100000 Lives Campaign ndash
mentor netw ork (OB) (2006)
AIM Reduce birth trauma and risk by innovative design and testing by
February 2006
AIM Reduction of Harm Outcome Measure- Perinatal Adverse Events
AIM Reducing Harm Improving Care Supporting Health
IHI Perinatal Focused Work Timeline
White Paper (2006)
Launch Perinatal IMPACT Community (2006)
IHI Perinatal Web and Action (2006)
Catholic Healthcare West (2006)
Mayo System (2006)
Developed Building Blocks (2007)
Developed Initial Driver Diagram (2007)
Oxytocin High Alert Medication Deep Dive (2007)
Vacuum Bundle Developed (2008 )
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance
bull Wales 1000 Lives Campaign (2007)
bull Northern Ireland (2009)
IMPACT Ended (82009)
PIC initiated (92009)
International Teams joined Community (2009-2014)
Expedition Improving Perinatal Safety -- The Oxytocin Bundle (2010)
Faculty Team expanded PIC Hospital Members (2010)
Innovation Workgroup Second Stage Safety (2010)
Labor Deep Dive Tool (2010)
Revised Driver Diagram -Leadership (2010)
Advanced Bundles developed (2010)
Birth Outcomes Initiative - Louisiana (2010 -2012)
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance (Scotland amp
Denmark) (2011)
Faculty Team expanded Patient Representative (2011)
ACOG Toolkit (IHI oxytocin bundles) (2012)
IHI How to Guide Obstetrical Adverse Events (2012)
Obstetrical Sepsis Summit (2012)
NCC Uses Oxytocin Bundles for Certif ication (2012)
Deep Dive Structure Tool (2012)
IHI HEN HRET (Perinatal Content) (2012)
Louisiana Cohort (20132014)
Louisiana HEN merged w LA Cohort (2013)
Maternity Action Team (2013)
Retired Original Oxytocin Bundles ((2013)
Expedition Treating Maternal Sepsis (2013)
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
Late Preterm Infant (2013)
Innovation Neonatal Workgroup (2013)
Innovation Nulliparous Workgroup (2013)
CMS Louisiana Performance Improvement Grant (2013)
Maternity Action Playbook Leadership Driver amp Change
Package (2014)
Critical Incident Coaching (2014)
IHI Perinatal Community Care Bundle Sequencing
Elective Induction Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
Augmentation Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
IHI Oxytocin Bundles (2004)
bull GAgt39 weeks
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Category I-normal)
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Exclusion of Category III)
Basic Oxytocin Bundles Defined as patient who receives
Oxytocin for elective induction or augmentation Focus on
eliminating elective delivery prior to 39 weeks adoption
of team definition and reliable execution of component
indicators
IHI Advanced Bundles (2010) Accept 39 weeks as minimal GA for elective delivery Bishop score of more than 8 in the nulliparous patient the probability of vaginal delivery after labor induction is similar to spontaneous laborFocus moves to pharmacologic or mechanical initiation of labor- no longer focused on (just) Oxytocin Evidence Based Gestational dating is core
Additional Bundles developed and or
supported by faculty and Innovation
Workgroups
Advanced Non-Medically
Indicated Bundle
Advanced Indicated Induction Bundle
Advanced Augmentation Bundle
Vacuum Bundle (2008)
Defined Patient without a
medical indication for delivery
bull Confi rmation of term
gestation
bull Pelvic Assessment Favorable
Bishop Score (locally
defined)
bull Recognition and
management of
compl ications of induction
method (including
tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I-
normal)
Defined Patient with a medical
indication for induction
bull Acceptable medical indication for
labor induction documented
(locally defined)
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
compl ications of induction method
(including tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management of
FHR Status
Exclus ion of Category III FHR
Defined
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management
of tachysystole
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I -
normal)
bull (Exclusion of Category II I)
(May include amniotomy nipple
s timulation acupuncture and
Oxytocin)
bull Alternative labor s trategies
bull Prepared patient
bull High probability of success
bull Maximum application time and
number of pop-offs predetermined
bull Exit s trategy available
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
bull NRP appropriate (vigorous infant 37
-41+ w eeks gestation
bull Identif ication of risk of
infectionsepsis
bull Delayed cord clamping
bull Breastfeeding Initiation
bull Delayed bath- (for f irst hour of life
bull Align Unit Measures Strategies Projects w ith Org Strategy and Goals (Clinical
Patient Exp Financial and Workforce)
bull Channel Senior Leadership Attention and Develop Unit Leadership
bull Engage Physicians
bull Build Improvement Capacity and Provide Resources for Improvement bull Establish a Just Culture
bull Develop a Competent Trained and Available Workforce
bull Establish Credentialing of Core Competency and Training for all Providers
bull Use ACOGAWHONN Guidelines for Documentation and Staff ing
bull Develop a Consumer Advisory Board
Perinatal
Leadership
bull Execute care that meets national standards (Implement Bundles Perinatal Core
Processes)
bull Develop standard processes and protocols for response to obstetrical emergency
bull Design care process improvement based on trigger tool analysis event detection
sentinel event bull Standardize administration of high alert medications ndash oxytocin magnesium sulfate
epidurals
bull Create an environment that Supports Care and Healing
bull Consider segments of population and design reliable and appropriate processes for
specif ic needs and characteristics of this segment of the population
Reliable
Design Reduce Variation
bull Adopt common language and interpretation of EFM w ith multi-disciplinary training ie
NICHD criteria
bull Implement techniques for effective communication ie SBAR
bull Establish reliable techniques for handoffs
bull Establish Team Response Protocols bull Implement Huddles
bull Design Simulations
Effective
Peer Teamwork
bull Design processes to support partnership in care betw een provider and patient and
family
bull Develop w ith patient a customized interdisciplinary shared care plan
bull Design care process improvement based on information obtained about patient
experience (interviews assessments focus groups surveys) bull Include patients and families on design and improvement teams
bull Communicate openly and honestly w ith family and patients at regular intervals
bull Do w hat you say mean w hat you do
Respectful
Patient Partnership
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births
Zero incidence of
elective deliveries prior to confirmation
of fetal maturity
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or
Compliance greater than 90
Improve organizational
culture of safety survey scores in
Perinatal units by 25
100 of participating
teams will have documentation of Patient amp
Family Centered Care
Perinatal Community
Reducing Harm Improving Care
Supporting Healing
Reduce Harm Improve Care
Support Healing
Respectful Patient
Partnership
Reliable Design amp Reduce Variation
Effective
Peer Teamwork
Perinatal Leadership
Perinatal Improvement Community
Measurement Strategy
Collaborative Perinatal Goals
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births Zero incidence of elective deliveries prior to confirmation of fetal maturity (39 weeks)
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or Compliance great than 90 Improve organizational culture of safety survey scores in Perinatal units by 25
100 of the participating teams will have documentation of Patient amp Family Centered Care
Perinatal Care Measurement Strategy Required Measures Optional Measures
Annual Bi-annual
Structure Assessments
Monthly Outcome amp Structure
Measures
Initial Weekly or Monthly
Process Measures
Advanced Weekly or Monthly
Outcome and Process Measures
Outcome Balance or Process
Measures
Oxytocin Deep Dive
Perinatal Harm
Augmentation Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Vacuum Bundle CompositeCompliance
Transfer to Higher Level of Care (A) (B)
Time Between Elective Deliveries
39 wks
Elective Induction Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Augmentation
Bundle Composite Compliance
Patient and Family Satisfaction
Culture of Safety Survey
Documentation Reliability
(InfantMother)
Elective Delivery Rate prior to 39 completed weeks
gestation (TJC PC01 )
Augmentation Induction Monthly Bundle
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Elective Induction Bundle
Composite Compliance
Time Between (Decision - Incision)
Prophylactic Antibiotic in C-section
Labor Deep Dive
Cesarean rate for low-risk first birth women
(TJC PC02) Elective Induction Monthly Bundle Compliance
(Oxytocin)
Advanced Indicated Induction
Bundle Composite Compliance
Birth trauma rate measures (NQF)
Incidence of episiotomy (NQF)
Patient and Family Centered Care
Gestational Age Reliability (Test
Measure)
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Testing our theory lessons learned
bull Spectrum of pregnancy intention
bull Closing the disparity gap
bull Maternal outcomes
Next steps Prototype testing
bull Partnership with Detroit WIN Network and
HFHS
bull Co-design community intervention based on
interventions
bull 9-month prototype test
A Historical Reflection 1995-2016
1995 BTS Improving Maternal and
Neonatal Outcomes
bull Reducing Cesarean Section Rates
National Congress
Innovation (2003-2006) IMPACT (2006 ndash 2009) Perinatal Improvement
Community (2009 ndash 2014)
Expert Meeting (2003)
Developed idealized Design
Concept Diagram (2004)
Oxytocin Bundles Meeting
(2004)
Phase I Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2004)
Phase II Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2005)
Initial Change Package for OB (2006)
100000 Lives Campaign ndash
mentor netw ork (OB) (2006)
AIM Reduce birth trauma and risk by innovative design and testing by
February 2006
AIM Reduction of Harm Outcome Measure- Perinatal Adverse Events
AIM Reducing Harm Improving Care Supporting Health
IHI Perinatal Focused Work Timeline
White Paper (2006)
Launch Perinatal IMPACT Community (2006)
IHI Perinatal Web and Action (2006)
Catholic Healthcare West (2006)
Mayo System (2006)
Developed Building Blocks (2007)
Developed Initial Driver Diagram (2007)
Oxytocin High Alert Medication Deep Dive (2007)
Vacuum Bundle Developed (2008 )
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance
bull Wales 1000 Lives Campaign (2007)
bull Northern Ireland (2009)
IMPACT Ended (82009)
PIC initiated (92009)
International Teams joined Community (2009-2014)
Expedition Improving Perinatal Safety -- The Oxytocin Bundle (2010)
Faculty Team expanded PIC Hospital Members (2010)
Innovation Workgroup Second Stage Safety (2010)
Labor Deep Dive Tool (2010)
Revised Driver Diagram -Leadership (2010)
Advanced Bundles developed (2010)
Birth Outcomes Initiative - Louisiana (2010 -2012)
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance (Scotland amp
Denmark) (2011)
Faculty Team expanded Patient Representative (2011)
ACOG Toolkit (IHI oxytocin bundles) (2012)
IHI How to Guide Obstetrical Adverse Events (2012)
Obstetrical Sepsis Summit (2012)
NCC Uses Oxytocin Bundles for Certif ication (2012)
Deep Dive Structure Tool (2012)
IHI HEN HRET (Perinatal Content) (2012)
Louisiana Cohort (20132014)
Louisiana HEN merged w LA Cohort (2013)
Maternity Action Team (2013)
Retired Original Oxytocin Bundles ((2013)
Expedition Treating Maternal Sepsis (2013)
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
Late Preterm Infant (2013)
Innovation Neonatal Workgroup (2013)
Innovation Nulliparous Workgroup (2013)
CMS Louisiana Performance Improvement Grant (2013)
Maternity Action Playbook Leadership Driver amp Change
Package (2014)
Critical Incident Coaching (2014)
IHI Perinatal Community Care Bundle Sequencing
Elective Induction Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
Augmentation Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
IHI Oxytocin Bundles (2004)
bull GAgt39 weeks
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Category I-normal)
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Exclusion of Category III)
Basic Oxytocin Bundles Defined as patient who receives
Oxytocin for elective induction or augmentation Focus on
eliminating elective delivery prior to 39 weeks adoption
of team definition and reliable execution of component
indicators
IHI Advanced Bundles (2010) Accept 39 weeks as minimal GA for elective delivery Bishop score of more than 8 in the nulliparous patient the probability of vaginal delivery after labor induction is similar to spontaneous laborFocus moves to pharmacologic or mechanical initiation of labor- no longer focused on (just) Oxytocin Evidence Based Gestational dating is core
Additional Bundles developed and or
supported by faculty and Innovation
Workgroups
Advanced Non-Medically
Indicated Bundle
Advanced Indicated Induction Bundle
Advanced Augmentation Bundle
Vacuum Bundle (2008)
Defined Patient without a
medical indication for delivery
bull Confi rmation of term
gestation
bull Pelvic Assessment Favorable
Bishop Score (locally
defined)
bull Recognition and
management of
compl ications of induction
method (including
tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I-
normal)
Defined Patient with a medical
indication for induction
bull Acceptable medical indication for
labor induction documented
(locally defined)
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
compl ications of induction method
(including tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management of
FHR Status
Exclus ion of Category III FHR
Defined
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management
of tachysystole
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I -
normal)
bull (Exclusion of Category II I)
(May include amniotomy nipple
s timulation acupuncture and
Oxytocin)
bull Alternative labor s trategies
bull Prepared patient
bull High probability of success
bull Maximum application time and
number of pop-offs predetermined
bull Exit s trategy available
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
bull NRP appropriate (vigorous infant 37
-41+ w eeks gestation
bull Identif ication of risk of
infectionsepsis
bull Delayed cord clamping
bull Breastfeeding Initiation
bull Delayed bath- (for f irst hour of life
bull Align Unit Measures Strategies Projects w ith Org Strategy and Goals (Clinical
Patient Exp Financial and Workforce)
bull Channel Senior Leadership Attention and Develop Unit Leadership
bull Engage Physicians
bull Build Improvement Capacity and Provide Resources for Improvement bull Establish a Just Culture
bull Develop a Competent Trained and Available Workforce
bull Establish Credentialing of Core Competency and Training for all Providers
bull Use ACOGAWHONN Guidelines for Documentation and Staff ing
bull Develop a Consumer Advisory Board
Perinatal
Leadership
bull Execute care that meets national standards (Implement Bundles Perinatal Core
Processes)
bull Develop standard processes and protocols for response to obstetrical emergency
bull Design care process improvement based on trigger tool analysis event detection
sentinel event bull Standardize administration of high alert medications ndash oxytocin magnesium sulfate
epidurals
bull Create an environment that Supports Care and Healing
bull Consider segments of population and design reliable and appropriate processes for
specif ic needs and characteristics of this segment of the population
Reliable
Design Reduce Variation
bull Adopt common language and interpretation of EFM w ith multi-disciplinary training ie
NICHD criteria
bull Implement techniques for effective communication ie SBAR
bull Establish reliable techniques for handoffs
bull Establish Team Response Protocols bull Implement Huddles
bull Design Simulations
Effective
Peer Teamwork
bull Design processes to support partnership in care betw een provider and patient and
family
bull Develop w ith patient a customized interdisciplinary shared care plan
bull Design care process improvement based on information obtained about patient
experience (interviews assessments focus groups surveys) bull Include patients and families on design and improvement teams
bull Communicate openly and honestly w ith family and patients at regular intervals
bull Do w hat you say mean w hat you do
Respectful
Patient Partnership
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births
Zero incidence of
elective deliveries prior to confirmation
of fetal maturity
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or
Compliance greater than 90
Improve organizational
culture of safety survey scores in
Perinatal units by 25
100 of participating
teams will have documentation of Patient amp
Family Centered Care
Perinatal Community
Reducing Harm Improving Care
Supporting Healing
Reduce Harm Improve Care
Support Healing
Respectful Patient
Partnership
Reliable Design amp Reduce Variation
Effective
Peer Teamwork
Perinatal Leadership
Perinatal Improvement Community
Measurement Strategy
Collaborative Perinatal Goals
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births Zero incidence of elective deliveries prior to confirmation of fetal maturity (39 weeks)
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or Compliance great than 90 Improve organizational culture of safety survey scores in Perinatal units by 25
100 of the participating teams will have documentation of Patient amp Family Centered Care
Perinatal Care Measurement Strategy Required Measures Optional Measures
Annual Bi-annual
Structure Assessments
Monthly Outcome amp Structure
Measures
Initial Weekly or Monthly
Process Measures
Advanced Weekly or Monthly
Outcome and Process Measures
Outcome Balance or Process
Measures
Oxytocin Deep Dive
Perinatal Harm
Augmentation Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Vacuum Bundle CompositeCompliance
Transfer to Higher Level of Care (A) (B)
Time Between Elective Deliveries
39 wks
Elective Induction Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Augmentation
Bundle Composite Compliance
Patient and Family Satisfaction
Culture of Safety Survey
Documentation Reliability
(InfantMother)
Elective Delivery Rate prior to 39 completed weeks
gestation (TJC PC01 )
Augmentation Induction Monthly Bundle
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Elective Induction Bundle
Composite Compliance
Time Between (Decision - Incision)
Prophylactic Antibiotic in C-section
Labor Deep Dive
Cesarean rate for low-risk first birth women
(TJC PC02) Elective Induction Monthly Bundle Compliance
(Oxytocin)
Advanced Indicated Induction
Bundle Composite Compliance
Birth trauma rate measures (NQF)
Incidence of episiotomy (NQF)
Patient and Family Centered Care
Gestational Age Reliability (Test
Measure)
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Next steps Prototype testing
bull Partnership with Detroit WIN Network and
HFHS
bull Co-design community intervention based on
interventions
bull 9-month prototype test
A Historical Reflection 1995-2016
1995 BTS Improving Maternal and
Neonatal Outcomes
bull Reducing Cesarean Section Rates
National Congress
Innovation (2003-2006) IMPACT (2006 ndash 2009) Perinatal Improvement
Community (2009 ndash 2014)
Expert Meeting (2003)
Developed idealized Design
Concept Diagram (2004)
Oxytocin Bundles Meeting
(2004)
Phase I Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2004)
Phase II Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2005)
Initial Change Package for OB (2006)
100000 Lives Campaign ndash
mentor netw ork (OB) (2006)
AIM Reduce birth trauma and risk by innovative design and testing by
February 2006
AIM Reduction of Harm Outcome Measure- Perinatal Adverse Events
AIM Reducing Harm Improving Care Supporting Health
IHI Perinatal Focused Work Timeline
White Paper (2006)
Launch Perinatal IMPACT Community (2006)
IHI Perinatal Web and Action (2006)
Catholic Healthcare West (2006)
Mayo System (2006)
Developed Building Blocks (2007)
Developed Initial Driver Diagram (2007)
Oxytocin High Alert Medication Deep Dive (2007)
Vacuum Bundle Developed (2008 )
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance
bull Wales 1000 Lives Campaign (2007)
bull Northern Ireland (2009)
IMPACT Ended (82009)
PIC initiated (92009)
International Teams joined Community (2009-2014)
Expedition Improving Perinatal Safety -- The Oxytocin Bundle (2010)
Faculty Team expanded PIC Hospital Members (2010)
Innovation Workgroup Second Stage Safety (2010)
Labor Deep Dive Tool (2010)
Revised Driver Diagram -Leadership (2010)
Advanced Bundles developed (2010)
Birth Outcomes Initiative - Louisiana (2010 -2012)
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance (Scotland amp
Denmark) (2011)
Faculty Team expanded Patient Representative (2011)
ACOG Toolkit (IHI oxytocin bundles) (2012)
IHI How to Guide Obstetrical Adverse Events (2012)
Obstetrical Sepsis Summit (2012)
NCC Uses Oxytocin Bundles for Certif ication (2012)
Deep Dive Structure Tool (2012)
IHI HEN HRET (Perinatal Content) (2012)
Louisiana Cohort (20132014)
Louisiana HEN merged w LA Cohort (2013)
Maternity Action Team (2013)
Retired Original Oxytocin Bundles ((2013)
Expedition Treating Maternal Sepsis (2013)
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
Late Preterm Infant (2013)
Innovation Neonatal Workgroup (2013)
Innovation Nulliparous Workgroup (2013)
CMS Louisiana Performance Improvement Grant (2013)
Maternity Action Playbook Leadership Driver amp Change
Package (2014)
Critical Incident Coaching (2014)
IHI Perinatal Community Care Bundle Sequencing
Elective Induction Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
Augmentation Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
IHI Oxytocin Bundles (2004)
bull GAgt39 weeks
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Category I-normal)
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Exclusion of Category III)
Basic Oxytocin Bundles Defined as patient who receives
Oxytocin for elective induction or augmentation Focus on
eliminating elective delivery prior to 39 weeks adoption
of team definition and reliable execution of component
indicators
IHI Advanced Bundles (2010) Accept 39 weeks as minimal GA for elective delivery Bishop score of more than 8 in the nulliparous patient the probability of vaginal delivery after labor induction is similar to spontaneous laborFocus moves to pharmacologic or mechanical initiation of labor- no longer focused on (just) Oxytocin Evidence Based Gestational dating is core
Additional Bundles developed and or
supported by faculty and Innovation
Workgroups
Advanced Non-Medically
Indicated Bundle
Advanced Indicated Induction Bundle
Advanced Augmentation Bundle
Vacuum Bundle (2008)
Defined Patient without a
medical indication for delivery
bull Confi rmation of term
gestation
bull Pelvic Assessment Favorable
Bishop Score (locally
defined)
bull Recognition and
management of
compl ications of induction
method (including
tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I-
normal)
Defined Patient with a medical
indication for induction
bull Acceptable medical indication for
labor induction documented
(locally defined)
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
compl ications of induction method
(including tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management of
FHR Status
Exclus ion of Category III FHR
Defined
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management
of tachysystole
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I -
normal)
bull (Exclusion of Category II I)
(May include amniotomy nipple
s timulation acupuncture and
Oxytocin)
bull Alternative labor s trategies
bull Prepared patient
bull High probability of success
bull Maximum application time and
number of pop-offs predetermined
bull Exit s trategy available
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
bull NRP appropriate (vigorous infant 37
-41+ w eeks gestation
bull Identif ication of risk of
infectionsepsis
bull Delayed cord clamping
bull Breastfeeding Initiation
bull Delayed bath- (for f irst hour of life
bull Align Unit Measures Strategies Projects w ith Org Strategy and Goals (Clinical
Patient Exp Financial and Workforce)
bull Channel Senior Leadership Attention and Develop Unit Leadership
bull Engage Physicians
bull Build Improvement Capacity and Provide Resources for Improvement bull Establish a Just Culture
bull Develop a Competent Trained and Available Workforce
bull Establish Credentialing of Core Competency and Training for all Providers
bull Use ACOGAWHONN Guidelines for Documentation and Staff ing
bull Develop a Consumer Advisory Board
Perinatal
Leadership
bull Execute care that meets national standards (Implement Bundles Perinatal Core
Processes)
bull Develop standard processes and protocols for response to obstetrical emergency
bull Design care process improvement based on trigger tool analysis event detection
sentinel event bull Standardize administration of high alert medications ndash oxytocin magnesium sulfate
epidurals
bull Create an environment that Supports Care and Healing
bull Consider segments of population and design reliable and appropriate processes for
specif ic needs and characteristics of this segment of the population
Reliable
Design Reduce Variation
bull Adopt common language and interpretation of EFM w ith multi-disciplinary training ie
NICHD criteria
bull Implement techniques for effective communication ie SBAR
bull Establish reliable techniques for handoffs
bull Establish Team Response Protocols bull Implement Huddles
bull Design Simulations
Effective
Peer Teamwork
bull Design processes to support partnership in care betw een provider and patient and
family
bull Develop w ith patient a customized interdisciplinary shared care plan
bull Design care process improvement based on information obtained about patient
experience (interviews assessments focus groups surveys) bull Include patients and families on design and improvement teams
bull Communicate openly and honestly w ith family and patients at regular intervals
bull Do w hat you say mean w hat you do
Respectful
Patient Partnership
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births
Zero incidence of
elective deliveries prior to confirmation
of fetal maturity
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or
Compliance greater than 90
Improve organizational
culture of safety survey scores in
Perinatal units by 25
100 of participating
teams will have documentation of Patient amp
Family Centered Care
Perinatal Community
Reducing Harm Improving Care
Supporting Healing
Reduce Harm Improve Care
Support Healing
Respectful Patient
Partnership
Reliable Design amp Reduce Variation
Effective
Peer Teamwork
Perinatal Leadership
Perinatal Improvement Community
Measurement Strategy
Collaborative Perinatal Goals
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births Zero incidence of elective deliveries prior to confirmation of fetal maturity (39 weeks)
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or Compliance great than 90 Improve organizational culture of safety survey scores in Perinatal units by 25
100 of the participating teams will have documentation of Patient amp Family Centered Care
Perinatal Care Measurement Strategy Required Measures Optional Measures
Annual Bi-annual
Structure Assessments
Monthly Outcome amp Structure
Measures
Initial Weekly or Monthly
Process Measures
Advanced Weekly or Monthly
Outcome and Process Measures
Outcome Balance or Process
Measures
Oxytocin Deep Dive
Perinatal Harm
Augmentation Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Vacuum Bundle CompositeCompliance
Transfer to Higher Level of Care (A) (B)
Time Between Elective Deliveries
39 wks
Elective Induction Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Augmentation
Bundle Composite Compliance
Patient and Family Satisfaction
Culture of Safety Survey
Documentation Reliability
(InfantMother)
Elective Delivery Rate prior to 39 completed weeks
gestation (TJC PC01 )
Augmentation Induction Monthly Bundle
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Elective Induction Bundle
Composite Compliance
Time Between (Decision - Incision)
Prophylactic Antibiotic in C-section
Labor Deep Dive
Cesarean rate for low-risk first birth women
(TJC PC02) Elective Induction Monthly Bundle Compliance
(Oxytocin)
Advanced Indicated Induction
Bundle Composite Compliance
Birth trauma rate measures (NQF)
Incidence of episiotomy (NQF)
Patient and Family Centered Care
Gestational Age Reliability (Test
Measure)
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
A Historical Reflection 1995-2016
1995 BTS Improving Maternal and
Neonatal Outcomes
bull Reducing Cesarean Section Rates
National Congress
Innovation (2003-2006) IMPACT (2006 ndash 2009) Perinatal Improvement
Community (2009 ndash 2014)
Expert Meeting (2003)
Developed idealized Design
Concept Diagram (2004)
Oxytocin Bundles Meeting
(2004)
Phase I Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2004)
Phase II Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2005)
Initial Change Package for OB (2006)
100000 Lives Campaign ndash
mentor netw ork (OB) (2006)
AIM Reduce birth trauma and risk by innovative design and testing by
February 2006
AIM Reduction of Harm Outcome Measure- Perinatal Adverse Events
AIM Reducing Harm Improving Care Supporting Health
IHI Perinatal Focused Work Timeline
White Paper (2006)
Launch Perinatal IMPACT Community (2006)
IHI Perinatal Web and Action (2006)
Catholic Healthcare West (2006)
Mayo System (2006)
Developed Building Blocks (2007)
Developed Initial Driver Diagram (2007)
Oxytocin High Alert Medication Deep Dive (2007)
Vacuum Bundle Developed (2008 )
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance
bull Wales 1000 Lives Campaign (2007)
bull Northern Ireland (2009)
IMPACT Ended (82009)
PIC initiated (92009)
International Teams joined Community (2009-2014)
Expedition Improving Perinatal Safety -- The Oxytocin Bundle (2010)
Faculty Team expanded PIC Hospital Members (2010)
Innovation Workgroup Second Stage Safety (2010)
Labor Deep Dive Tool (2010)
Revised Driver Diagram -Leadership (2010)
Advanced Bundles developed (2010)
Birth Outcomes Initiative - Louisiana (2010 -2012)
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance (Scotland amp
Denmark) (2011)
Faculty Team expanded Patient Representative (2011)
ACOG Toolkit (IHI oxytocin bundles) (2012)
IHI How to Guide Obstetrical Adverse Events (2012)
Obstetrical Sepsis Summit (2012)
NCC Uses Oxytocin Bundles for Certif ication (2012)
Deep Dive Structure Tool (2012)
IHI HEN HRET (Perinatal Content) (2012)
Louisiana Cohort (20132014)
Louisiana HEN merged w LA Cohort (2013)
Maternity Action Team (2013)
Retired Original Oxytocin Bundles ((2013)
Expedition Treating Maternal Sepsis (2013)
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
Late Preterm Infant (2013)
Innovation Neonatal Workgroup (2013)
Innovation Nulliparous Workgroup (2013)
CMS Louisiana Performance Improvement Grant (2013)
Maternity Action Playbook Leadership Driver amp Change
Package (2014)
Critical Incident Coaching (2014)
IHI Perinatal Community Care Bundle Sequencing
Elective Induction Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
Augmentation Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
IHI Oxytocin Bundles (2004)
bull GAgt39 weeks
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Category I-normal)
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Exclusion of Category III)
Basic Oxytocin Bundles Defined as patient who receives
Oxytocin for elective induction or augmentation Focus on
eliminating elective delivery prior to 39 weeks adoption
of team definition and reliable execution of component
indicators
IHI Advanced Bundles (2010) Accept 39 weeks as minimal GA for elective delivery Bishop score of more than 8 in the nulliparous patient the probability of vaginal delivery after labor induction is similar to spontaneous laborFocus moves to pharmacologic or mechanical initiation of labor- no longer focused on (just) Oxytocin Evidence Based Gestational dating is core
Additional Bundles developed and or
supported by faculty and Innovation
Workgroups
Advanced Non-Medically
Indicated Bundle
Advanced Indicated Induction Bundle
Advanced Augmentation Bundle
Vacuum Bundle (2008)
Defined Patient without a
medical indication for delivery
bull Confi rmation of term
gestation
bull Pelvic Assessment Favorable
Bishop Score (locally
defined)
bull Recognition and
management of
compl ications of induction
method (including
tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I-
normal)
Defined Patient with a medical
indication for induction
bull Acceptable medical indication for
labor induction documented
(locally defined)
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
compl ications of induction method
(including tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management of
FHR Status
Exclus ion of Category III FHR
Defined
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management
of tachysystole
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I -
normal)
bull (Exclusion of Category II I)
(May include amniotomy nipple
s timulation acupuncture and
Oxytocin)
bull Alternative labor s trategies
bull Prepared patient
bull High probability of success
bull Maximum application time and
number of pop-offs predetermined
bull Exit s trategy available
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
bull NRP appropriate (vigorous infant 37
-41+ w eeks gestation
bull Identif ication of risk of
infectionsepsis
bull Delayed cord clamping
bull Breastfeeding Initiation
bull Delayed bath- (for f irst hour of life
bull Align Unit Measures Strategies Projects w ith Org Strategy and Goals (Clinical
Patient Exp Financial and Workforce)
bull Channel Senior Leadership Attention and Develop Unit Leadership
bull Engage Physicians
bull Build Improvement Capacity and Provide Resources for Improvement bull Establish a Just Culture
bull Develop a Competent Trained and Available Workforce
bull Establish Credentialing of Core Competency and Training for all Providers
bull Use ACOGAWHONN Guidelines for Documentation and Staff ing
bull Develop a Consumer Advisory Board
Perinatal
Leadership
bull Execute care that meets national standards (Implement Bundles Perinatal Core
Processes)
bull Develop standard processes and protocols for response to obstetrical emergency
bull Design care process improvement based on trigger tool analysis event detection
sentinel event bull Standardize administration of high alert medications ndash oxytocin magnesium sulfate
epidurals
bull Create an environment that Supports Care and Healing
bull Consider segments of population and design reliable and appropriate processes for
specif ic needs and characteristics of this segment of the population
Reliable
Design Reduce Variation
bull Adopt common language and interpretation of EFM w ith multi-disciplinary training ie
NICHD criteria
bull Implement techniques for effective communication ie SBAR
bull Establish reliable techniques for handoffs
bull Establish Team Response Protocols bull Implement Huddles
bull Design Simulations
Effective
Peer Teamwork
bull Design processes to support partnership in care betw een provider and patient and
family
bull Develop w ith patient a customized interdisciplinary shared care plan
bull Design care process improvement based on information obtained about patient
experience (interviews assessments focus groups surveys) bull Include patients and families on design and improvement teams
bull Communicate openly and honestly w ith family and patients at regular intervals
bull Do w hat you say mean w hat you do
Respectful
Patient Partnership
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births
Zero incidence of
elective deliveries prior to confirmation
of fetal maturity
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or
Compliance greater than 90
Improve organizational
culture of safety survey scores in
Perinatal units by 25
100 of participating
teams will have documentation of Patient amp
Family Centered Care
Perinatal Community
Reducing Harm Improving Care
Supporting Healing
Reduce Harm Improve Care
Support Healing
Respectful Patient
Partnership
Reliable Design amp Reduce Variation
Effective
Peer Teamwork
Perinatal Leadership
Perinatal Improvement Community
Measurement Strategy
Collaborative Perinatal Goals
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births Zero incidence of elective deliveries prior to confirmation of fetal maturity (39 weeks)
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or Compliance great than 90 Improve organizational culture of safety survey scores in Perinatal units by 25
100 of the participating teams will have documentation of Patient amp Family Centered Care
Perinatal Care Measurement Strategy Required Measures Optional Measures
Annual Bi-annual
Structure Assessments
Monthly Outcome amp Structure
Measures
Initial Weekly or Monthly
Process Measures
Advanced Weekly or Monthly
Outcome and Process Measures
Outcome Balance or Process
Measures
Oxytocin Deep Dive
Perinatal Harm
Augmentation Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Vacuum Bundle CompositeCompliance
Transfer to Higher Level of Care (A) (B)
Time Between Elective Deliveries
39 wks
Elective Induction Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Augmentation
Bundle Composite Compliance
Patient and Family Satisfaction
Culture of Safety Survey
Documentation Reliability
(InfantMother)
Elective Delivery Rate prior to 39 completed weeks
gestation (TJC PC01 )
Augmentation Induction Monthly Bundle
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Elective Induction Bundle
Composite Compliance
Time Between (Decision - Incision)
Prophylactic Antibiotic in C-section
Labor Deep Dive
Cesarean rate for low-risk first birth women
(TJC PC02) Elective Induction Monthly Bundle Compliance
(Oxytocin)
Advanced Indicated Induction
Bundle Composite Compliance
Birth trauma rate measures (NQF)
Incidence of episiotomy (NQF)
Patient and Family Centered Care
Gestational Age Reliability (Test
Measure)
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Innovation (2003-2006) IMPACT (2006 ndash 2009) Perinatal Improvement
Community (2009 ndash 2014)
Expert Meeting (2003)
Developed idealized Design
Concept Diagram (2004)
Oxytocin Bundles Meeting
(2004)
Phase I Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2004)
Phase II Ascension
HealthcarePremier Perinatal
Effort (2005)
Initial Change Package for OB (2006)
100000 Lives Campaign ndash
mentor netw ork (OB) (2006)
AIM Reduce birth trauma and risk by innovative design and testing by
February 2006
AIM Reduction of Harm Outcome Measure- Perinatal Adverse Events
AIM Reducing Harm Improving Care Supporting Health
IHI Perinatal Focused Work Timeline
White Paper (2006)
Launch Perinatal IMPACT Community (2006)
IHI Perinatal Web and Action (2006)
Catholic Healthcare West (2006)
Mayo System (2006)
Developed Building Blocks (2007)
Developed Initial Driver Diagram (2007)
Oxytocin High Alert Medication Deep Dive (2007)
Vacuum Bundle Developed (2008 )
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance
bull Wales 1000 Lives Campaign (2007)
bull Northern Ireland (2009)
IMPACT Ended (82009)
PIC initiated (92009)
International Teams joined Community (2009-2014)
Expedition Improving Perinatal Safety -- The Oxytocin Bundle (2010)
Faculty Team expanded PIC Hospital Members (2010)
Innovation Workgroup Second Stage Safety (2010)
Labor Deep Dive Tool (2010)
Revised Driver Diagram -Leadership (2010)
Advanced Bundles developed (2010)
Birth Outcomes Initiative - Louisiana (2010 -2012)
International Perinatal Collaborative Guidance (Scotland amp
Denmark) (2011)
Faculty Team expanded Patient Representative (2011)
ACOG Toolkit (IHI oxytocin bundles) (2012)
IHI How to Guide Obstetrical Adverse Events (2012)
Obstetrical Sepsis Summit (2012)
NCC Uses Oxytocin Bundles for Certif ication (2012)
Deep Dive Structure Tool (2012)
IHI HEN HRET (Perinatal Content) (2012)
Louisiana Cohort (20132014)
Louisiana HEN merged w LA Cohort (2013)
Maternity Action Team (2013)
Retired Original Oxytocin Bundles ((2013)
Expedition Treating Maternal Sepsis (2013)
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
Late Preterm Infant (2013)
Innovation Neonatal Workgroup (2013)
Innovation Nulliparous Workgroup (2013)
CMS Louisiana Performance Improvement Grant (2013)
Maternity Action Playbook Leadership Driver amp Change
Package (2014)
Critical Incident Coaching (2014)
IHI Perinatal Community Care Bundle Sequencing
Elective Induction Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
Augmentation Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
IHI Oxytocin Bundles (2004)
bull GAgt39 weeks
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Category I-normal)
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Exclusion of Category III)
Basic Oxytocin Bundles Defined as patient who receives
Oxytocin for elective induction or augmentation Focus on
eliminating elective delivery prior to 39 weeks adoption
of team definition and reliable execution of component
indicators
IHI Advanced Bundles (2010) Accept 39 weeks as minimal GA for elective delivery Bishop score of more than 8 in the nulliparous patient the probability of vaginal delivery after labor induction is similar to spontaneous laborFocus moves to pharmacologic or mechanical initiation of labor- no longer focused on (just) Oxytocin Evidence Based Gestational dating is core
Additional Bundles developed and or
supported by faculty and Innovation
Workgroups
Advanced Non-Medically
Indicated Bundle
Advanced Indicated Induction Bundle
Advanced Augmentation Bundle
Vacuum Bundle (2008)
Defined Patient without a
medical indication for delivery
bull Confi rmation of term
gestation
bull Pelvic Assessment Favorable
Bishop Score (locally
defined)
bull Recognition and
management of
compl ications of induction
method (including
tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I-
normal)
Defined Patient with a medical
indication for induction
bull Acceptable medical indication for
labor induction documented
(locally defined)
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
compl ications of induction method
(including tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management of
FHR Status
Exclus ion of Category III FHR
Defined
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management
of tachysystole
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I -
normal)
bull (Exclusion of Category II I)
(May include amniotomy nipple
s timulation acupuncture and
Oxytocin)
bull Alternative labor s trategies
bull Prepared patient
bull High probability of success
bull Maximum application time and
number of pop-offs predetermined
bull Exit s trategy available
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
bull NRP appropriate (vigorous infant 37
-41+ w eeks gestation
bull Identif ication of risk of
infectionsepsis
bull Delayed cord clamping
bull Breastfeeding Initiation
bull Delayed bath- (for f irst hour of life
bull Align Unit Measures Strategies Projects w ith Org Strategy and Goals (Clinical
Patient Exp Financial and Workforce)
bull Channel Senior Leadership Attention and Develop Unit Leadership
bull Engage Physicians
bull Build Improvement Capacity and Provide Resources for Improvement bull Establish a Just Culture
bull Develop a Competent Trained and Available Workforce
bull Establish Credentialing of Core Competency and Training for all Providers
bull Use ACOGAWHONN Guidelines for Documentation and Staff ing
bull Develop a Consumer Advisory Board
Perinatal
Leadership
bull Execute care that meets national standards (Implement Bundles Perinatal Core
Processes)
bull Develop standard processes and protocols for response to obstetrical emergency
bull Design care process improvement based on trigger tool analysis event detection
sentinel event bull Standardize administration of high alert medications ndash oxytocin magnesium sulfate
epidurals
bull Create an environment that Supports Care and Healing
bull Consider segments of population and design reliable and appropriate processes for
specif ic needs and characteristics of this segment of the population
Reliable
Design Reduce Variation
bull Adopt common language and interpretation of EFM w ith multi-disciplinary training ie
NICHD criteria
bull Implement techniques for effective communication ie SBAR
bull Establish reliable techniques for handoffs
bull Establish Team Response Protocols bull Implement Huddles
bull Design Simulations
Effective
Peer Teamwork
bull Design processes to support partnership in care betw een provider and patient and
family
bull Develop w ith patient a customized interdisciplinary shared care plan
bull Design care process improvement based on information obtained about patient
experience (interviews assessments focus groups surveys) bull Include patients and families on design and improvement teams
bull Communicate openly and honestly w ith family and patients at regular intervals
bull Do w hat you say mean w hat you do
Respectful
Patient Partnership
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births
Zero incidence of
elective deliveries prior to confirmation
of fetal maturity
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or
Compliance greater than 90
Improve organizational
culture of safety survey scores in
Perinatal units by 25
100 of participating
teams will have documentation of Patient amp
Family Centered Care
Perinatal Community
Reducing Harm Improving Care
Supporting Healing
Reduce Harm Improve Care
Support Healing
Respectful Patient
Partnership
Reliable Design amp Reduce Variation
Effective
Peer Teamwork
Perinatal Leadership
Perinatal Improvement Community
Measurement Strategy
Collaborative Perinatal Goals
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births Zero incidence of elective deliveries prior to confirmation of fetal maturity (39 weeks)
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or Compliance great than 90 Improve organizational culture of safety survey scores in Perinatal units by 25
100 of the participating teams will have documentation of Patient amp Family Centered Care
Perinatal Care Measurement Strategy Required Measures Optional Measures
Annual Bi-annual
Structure Assessments
Monthly Outcome amp Structure
Measures
Initial Weekly or Monthly
Process Measures
Advanced Weekly or Monthly
Outcome and Process Measures
Outcome Balance or Process
Measures
Oxytocin Deep Dive
Perinatal Harm
Augmentation Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Vacuum Bundle CompositeCompliance
Transfer to Higher Level of Care (A) (B)
Time Between Elective Deliveries
39 wks
Elective Induction Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Augmentation
Bundle Composite Compliance
Patient and Family Satisfaction
Culture of Safety Survey
Documentation Reliability
(InfantMother)
Elective Delivery Rate prior to 39 completed weeks
gestation (TJC PC01 )
Augmentation Induction Monthly Bundle
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Elective Induction Bundle
Composite Compliance
Time Between (Decision - Incision)
Prophylactic Antibiotic in C-section
Labor Deep Dive
Cesarean rate for low-risk first birth women
(TJC PC02) Elective Induction Monthly Bundle Compliance
(Oxytocin)
Advanced Indicated Induction
Bundle Composite Compliance
Birth trauma rate measures (NQF)
Incidence of episiotomy (NQF)
Patient and Family Centered Care
Gestational Age Reliability (Test
Measure)
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
IHI Perinatal Community Care Bundle Sequencing
Elective Induction Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
Augmentation Bundle
(Ini tial-Oxytocin)
IHI Oxytocin Bundles (2004)
bull GAgt39 weeks
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Category I-normal)
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
tachysystole
bull Recognition and management of FHR
Status (Exclusion of Category III)
Basic Oxytocin Bundles Defined as patient who receives
Oxytocin for elective induction or augmentation Focus on
eliminating elective delivery prior to 39 weeks adoption
of team definition and reliable execution of component
indicators
IHI Advanced Bundles (2010) Accept 39 weeks as minimal GA for elective delivery Bishop score of more than 8 in the nulliparous patient the probability of vaginal delivery after labor induction is similar to spontaneous laborFocus moves to pharmacologic or mechanical initiation of labor- no longer focused on (just) Oxytocin Evidence Based Gestational dating is core
Additional Bundles developed and or
supported by faculty and Innovation
Workgroups
Advanced Non-Medically
Indicated Bundle
Advanced Indicated Induction Bundle
Advanced Augmentation Bundle
Vacuum Bundle (2008)
Defined Patient without a
medical indication for delivery
bull Confi rmation of term
gestation
bull Pelvic Assessment Favorable
Bishop Score (locally
defined)
bull Recognition and
management of
compl ications of induction
method (including
tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I-
normal)
Defined Patient with a medical
indication for induction
bull Acceptable medical indication for
labor induction documented
(locally defined)
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management of
compl ications of induction method
(including tachysystole)
bull Recognition and management of
FHR Status
Exclus ion of Category III FHR
Defined
bull EFW documented
bull Pelvic Assessment
bull Recognition and management
of tachysystole
bull Recognition and management
of FHR Status (Category I -
normal)
bull (Exclusion of Category II I)
(May include amniotomy nipple
s timulation acupuncture and
Oxytocin)
bull Alternative labor s trategies
bull Prepared patient
bull High probability of success
bull Maximum application time and
number of pop-offs predetermined
bull Exit s trategy available
Neonatal Advantage Bundle (2013)
bull NRP appropriate (vigorous infant 37
-41+ w eeks gestation
bull Identif ication of risk of
infectionsepsis
bull Delayed cord clamping
bull Breastfeeding Initiation
bull Delayed bath- (for f irst hour of life
bull Align Unit Measures Strategies Projects w ith Org Strategy and Goals (Clinical
Patient Exp Financial and Workforce)
bull Channel Senior Leadership Attention and Develop Unit Leadership
bull Engage Physicians
bull Build Improvement Capacity and Provide Resources for Improvement bull Establish a Just Culture
bull Develop a Competent Trained and Available Workforce
bull Establish Credentialing of Core Competency and Training for all Providers
bull Use ACOGAWHONN Guidelines for Documentation and Staff ing
bull Develop a Consumer Advisory Board
Perinatal
Leadership
bull Execute care that meets national standards (Implement Bundles Perinatal Core
Processes)
bull Develop standard processes and protocols for response to obstetrical emergency
bull Design care process improvement based on trigger tool analysis event detection
sentinel event bull Standardize administration of high alert medications ndash oxytocin magnesium sulfate
epidurals
bull Create an environment that Supports Care and Healing
bull Consider segments of population and design reliable and appropriate processes for
specif ic needs and characteristics of this segment of the population
Reliable
Design Reduce Variation
bull Adopt common language and interpretation of EFM w ith multi-disciplinary training ie
NICHD criteria
bull Implement techniques for effective communication ie SBAR
bull Establish reliable techniques for handoffs
bull Establish Team Response Protocols bull Implement Huddles
bull Design Simulations
Effective
Peer Teamwork
bull Design processes to support partnership in care betw een provider and patient and
family
bull Develop w ith patient a customized interdisciplinary shared care plan
bull Design care process improvement based on information obtained about patient
experience (interviews assessments focus groups surveys) bull Include patients and families on design and improvement teams
bull Communicate openly and honestly w ith family and patients at regular intervals
bull Do w hat you say mean w hat you do
Respectful
Patient Partnership
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births
Zero incidence of
elective deliveries prior to confirmation
of fetal maturity
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or
Compliance greater than 90
Improve organizational
culture of safety survey scores in
Perinatal units by 25
100 of participating
teams will have documentation of Patient amp
Family Centered Care
Perinatal Community
Reducing Harm Improving Care
Supporting Healing
Reduce Harm Improve Care
Support Healing
Respectful Patient
Partnership
Reliable Design amp Reduce Variation
Effective
Peer Teamwork
Perinatal Leadership
Perinatal Improvement Community
Measurement Strategy
Collaborative Perinatal Goals
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births Zero incidence of elective deliveries prior to confirmation of fetal maturity (39 weeks)
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or Compliance great than 90 Improve organizational culture of safety survey scores in Perinatal units by 25
100 of the participating teams will have documentation of Patient amp Family Centered Care
Perinatal Care Measurement Strategy Required Measures Optional Measures
Annual Bi-annual
Structure Assessments
Monthly Outcome amp Structure
Measures
Initial Weekly or Monthly
Process Measures
Advanced Weekly or Monthly
Outcome and Process Measures
Outcome Balance or Process
Measures
Oxytocin Deep Dive
Perinatal Harm
Augmentation Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Vacuum Bundle CompositeCompliance
Transfer to Higher Level of Care (A) (B)
Time Between Elective Deliveries
39 wks
Elective Induction Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Augmentation
Bundle Composite Compliance
Patient and Family Satisfaction
Culture of Safety Survey
Documentation Reliability
(InfantMother)
Elective Delivery Rate prior to 39 completed weeks
gestation (TJC PC01 )
Augmentation Induction Monthly Bundle
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Elective Induction Bundle
Composite Compliance
Time Between (Decision - Incision)
Prophylactic Antibiotic in C-section
Labor Deep Dive
Cesarean rate for low-risk first birth women
(TJC PC02) Elective Induction Monthly Bundle Compliance
(Oxytocin)
Advanced Indicated Induction
Bundle Composite Compliance
Birth trauma rate measures (NQF)
Incidence of episiotomy (NQF)
Patient and Family Centered Care
Gestational Age Reliability (Test
Measure)
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
bull Align Unit Measures Strategies Projects w ith Org Strategy and Goals (Clinical
Patient Exp Financial and Workforce)
bull Channel Senior Leadership Attention and Develop Unit Leadership
bull Engage Physicians
bull Build Improvement Capacity and Provide Resources for Improvement bull Establish a Just Culture
bull Develop a Competent Trained and Available Workforce
bull Establish Credentialing of Core Competency and Training for all Providers
bull Use ACOGAWHONN Guidelines for Documentation and Staff ing
bull Develop a Consumer Advisory Board
Perinatal
Leadership
bull Execute care that meets national standards (Implement Bundles Perinatal Core
Processes)
bull Develop standard processes and protocols for response to obstetrical emergency
bull Design care process improvement based on trigger tool analysis event detection
sentinel event bull Standardize administration of high alert medications ndash oxytocin magnesium sulfate
epidurals
bull Create an environment that Supports Care and Healing
bull Consider segments of population and design reliable and appropriate processes for
specif ic needs and characteristics of this segment of the population
Reliable
Design Reduce Variation
bull Adopt common language and interpretation of EFM w ith multi-disciplinary training ie
NICHD criteria
bull Implement techniques for effective communication ie SBAR
bull Establish reliable techniques for handoffs
bull Establish Team Response Protocols bull Implement Huddles
bull Design Simulations
Effective
Peer Teamwork
bull Design processes to support partnership in care betw een provider and patient and
family
bull Develop w ith patient a customized interdisciplinary shared care plan
bull Design care process improvement based on information obtained about patient
experience (interviews assessments focus groups surveys) bull Include patients and families on design and improvement teams
bull Communicate openly and honestly w ith family and patients at regular intervals
bull Do w hat you say mean w hat you do
Respectful
Patient Partnership
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births
Zero incidence of
elective deliveries prior to confirmation
of fetal maturity
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or
Compliance greater than 90
Improve organizational
culture of safety survey scores in
Perinatal units by 25
100 of participating
teams will have documentation of Patient amp
Family Centered Care
Perinatal Community
Reducing Harm Improving Care
Supporting Healing
Reduce Harm Improve Care
Support Healing
Respectful Patient
Partnership
Reliable Design amp Reduce Variation
Effective
Peer Teamwork
Perinatal Leadership
Perinatal Improvement Community
Measurement Strategy
Collaborative Perinatal Goals
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births Zero incidence of elective deliveries prior to confirmation of fetal maturity (39 weeks)
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or Compliance great than 90 Improve organizational culture of safety survey scores in Perinatal units by 25
100 of the participating teams will have documentation of Patient amp Family Centered Care
Perinatal Care Measurement Strategy Required Measures Optional Measures
Annual Bi-annual
Structure Assessments
Monthly Outcome amp Structure
Measures
Initial Weekly or Monthly
Process Measures
Advanced Weekly or Monthly
Outcome and Process Measures
Outcome Balance or Process
Measures
Oxytocin Deep Dive
Perinatal Harm
Augmentation Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Vacuum Bundle CompositeCompliance
Transfer to Higher Level of Care (A) (B)
Time Between Elective Deliveries
39 wks
Elective Induction Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Augmentation
Bundle Composite Compliance
Patient and Family Satisfaction
Culture of Safety Survey
Documentation Reliability
(InfantMother)
Elective Delivery Rate prior to 39 completed weeks
gestation (TJC PC01 )
Augmentation Induction Monthly Bundle
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Elective Induction Bundle
Composite Compliance
Time Between (Decision - Incision)
Prophylactic Antibiotic in C-section
Labor Deep Dive
Cesarean rate for low-risk first birth women
(TJC PC02) Elective Induction Monthly Bundle Compliance
(Oxytocin)
Advanced Indicated Induction
Bundle Composite Compliance
Birth trauma rate measures (NQF)
Incidence of episiotomy (NQF)
Patient and Family Centered Care
Gestational Age Reliability (Test
Measure)
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Reduce Harm Improve Care
Support Healing
Respectful Patient
Partnership
Reliable Design amp Reduce Variation
Effective
Peer Teamwork
Perinatal Leadership
Perinatal Improvement Community
Measurement Strategy
Collaborative Perinatal Goals
Reduce harm to 5 or less per 100 live births Zero incidence of elective deliveries prior to confirmation of fetal maturity (39 weeks)
Augmentation Bundle(s) Composite or Compliance great than 90 Improve organizational culture of safety survey scores in Perinatal units by 25
100 of the participating teams will have documentation of Patient amp Family Centered Care
Perinatal Care Measurement Strategy Required Measures Optional Measures
Annual Bi-annual
Structure Assessments
Monthly Outcome amp Structure
Measures
Initial Weekly or Monthly
Process Measures
Advanced Weekly or Monthly
Outcome and Process Measures
Outcome Balance or Process
Measures
Oxytocin Deep Dive
Perinatal Harm
Augmentation Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Vacuum Bundle CompositeCompliance
Transfer to Higher Level of Care (A) (B)
Time Between Elective Deliveries
39 wks
Elective Induction Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Augmentation
Bundle Composite Compliance
Patient and Family Satisfaction
Culture of Safety Survey
Documentation Reliability
(InfantMother)
Elective Delivery Rate prior to 39 completed weeks
gestation (TJC PC01 )
Augmentation Induction Monthly Bundle
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Elective Induction Bundle
Composite Compliance
Time Between (Decision - Incision)
Prophylactic Antibiotic in C-section
Labor Deep Dive
Cesarean rate for low-risk first birth women
(TJC PC02) Elective Induction Monthly Bundle Compliance
(Oxytocin)
Advanced Indicated Induction
Bundle Composite Compliance
Birth trauma rate measures (NQF)
Incidence of episiotomy (NQF)
Patient and Family Centered Care
Gestational Age Reliability (Test
Measure)
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Perinatal Care Measurement Strategy Required Measures Optional Measures
Annual Bi-annual
Structure Assessments
Monthly Outcome amp Structure
Measures
Initial Weekly or Monthly
Process Measures
Advanced Weekly or Monthly
Outcome and Process Measures
Outcome Balance or Process
Measures
Oxytocin Deep Dive
Perinatal Harm
Augmentation Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Vacuum Bundle CompositeCompliance
Transfer to Higher Level of Care (A) (B)
Time Between Elective Deliveries
39 wks
Elective Induction Bundle Composite and
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Augmentation
Bundle Composite Compliance
Patient and Family Satisfaction
Culture of Safety Survey
Documentation Reliability
(InfantMother)
Elective Delivery Rate prior to 39 completed weeks
gestation (TJC PC01 )
Augmentation Induction Monthly Bundle
Compliance (Oxytocin)
Advanced Elective Induction Bundle
Composite Compliance
Time Between (Decision - Incision)
Prophylactic Antibiotic in C-section
Labor Deep Dive
Cesarean rate for low-risk first birth women
(TJC PC02) Elective Induction Monthly Bundle Compliance
(Oxytocin)
Advanced Indicated Induction
Bundle Composite Compliance
Birth trauma rate measures (NQF)
Incidence of episiotomy (NQF)
Patient and Family Centered Care
Gestational Age Reliability (Test
Measure)
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
National Maternal Health Initiative
Strategies to Improve Maternal
Health And Safety May 5th 2013
New Orleans LA
Society for Maternal-
Fetal Medicine (SMFM)
Maternal Child Health Branch (MCH-B)
Division of Reproductive Health
IHI to National Movements
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
USA Council on Patient Safety
httpwwwsafehealthcareforeverywomanorgsecurehome
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Maternity Safety Bundles
ldquoWhat every birthing facility should havehelliprdquo
bull Obstetric Hemorrhage Safety Bundle
bull VTE Prevention Safety Bundle
bull Severe Hypertension Safety Bundle
bull Maternal Early Warning Criteria (triggers)
bull Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births Bundle
bull Patient Family and Staff Support Bundle
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Use of Current Bundles in the Field
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Qatar Study
bull Conclusion The study findings revealed that maternal complications such
as gestational diabetes gestational hypertension ante-partum hemorrhage
and maternal anemia were significantly higher in older pregnant women
Similarly neonatal complications were higher in the newborns of older
women
bull Gestational hypertension was the leading maternal complication observed in Arab women
Focus on Severe Hypertension Bundle
httpwwwjfcmonlinecomtempJFamCommunityMed20127-7551969_205839pdf
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
The Good
ndash Excellent prenatal care with close observation for
worsening disease and timely intervention can
decrease poor outcomes
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
The Bad ndash Preventable severe morbidity or mortality related to poor clinical
application of new knowledge regarding
ndash Dynamic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Multi-systemic nature of preeclampsia
ndash Possibility of post partum worsening or initial presentation of
preeclampsia often outside of obstetric care
ndash The overcommitment to previously taught rigid diagnostic ldquotriadrdquo criteria for
preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Recommended changes
ndash Classification
ndash Diagnostic criteria
ndash Management
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy What Was Learned
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
bull PIH GONE
bull Severity of proteinuria GONE
bull Presence of fetal IUGR GONE
bull The term ldquomildrdquo preeclampsia GONE
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Changes in Classification
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Quickly identify and manage gt160 systolic OR gt110 diastolic is considered an hypertensive emergency in pregnancy
ndash This should be confirmed within 15 minutes and therapy initiated in
order to decrease blood pressure
ndash Standardized protocols should be used for treatment provider
notification fetal and maternal surveillance
Hypertensive Emergencies- Management
Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset Severe Hypertension With Preeclampsia or Eclampsia ACOG Committee Opinion 514 December 2011
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
ndash Patients with Chronic hypertension without maternal or fetal complications
should not be delivered before 38 completed weeks
ndash Patients with uncomplicated preeclampsia should be delivered at 37 completed weeks
Timing of delivery- management
Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Executive Summary Obstetrics amp Gynecology 122(5)1122-1131 November 2013
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
bull Preeclampsia is a dynamic disease
bull Preeclampsia is a Multi-Systemic disease
bull Preeclampsia can initially present or worsen post partum often outside of obstetric care
bull Changes in classification diagnosis and management are needed
to more closely reflect current knowledge of HDP
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Conclusions
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Learning in Louisiana - Our AIM together
By September 23 2016 we will reduce obstetric adverse events by
40 in the following categories
1 Obstetric Hemorrhage Events
2 Preeclampsia and Severe Hypertension
3 Maintain or further decrease non-medically indicated
inductions prior to 39 weeks
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Pre-work
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Major Resources
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Results So Far
Designing the work for the Louisiana Sites
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
PreeclampsiaSevere Hypertension 12616
ReportingSystems Learning (every unit) YES NO
S1 Establish a culture of huddles for high risk patients and post-event debriefs to identify successes and opportunities
5 6
S2 Multidisciplinary review or all severe hypertensiveeclampsia cases admitted to ICU for systems issues
5 6
S3 Monitor outcomes and process metrics 7 4
Structure
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Designing for reliability
bull Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it
gets Batalden
bull Is your system designed to achieve best possible
outcomes for women and children
bull How do we begin to transform and improve our systems
and processes in order to achieve best outcomes
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Insanity as defined by
Einstein
Doing the same over and
over again and expecting
different results
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
lsquoThatrsquos been one of my mantrasrdquo focus and simplify Simple can be harder than complexity you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple But itrsquos worth it in the end because once you get there you can move mountainsrsquo Steve Jobs
Keep it simple
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
We need a framework for
improvement
Structure
+ Process
+Culture
=Outcome
Added to Donabedianrsquos original formulation by R Lloyd and R Scoville
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Improvement requireshellip
Measurement A Clear Aim Change
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Scotland- Social and lifestyle
factors 2009 ISD data bull 14741- 25 babies born into areas of highest
deprivation in Scotland bull 181 of pregnant women reported smoking at booking
CMACE
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
The Scottish Patient Safety
Maternity Programme
Dr Patricia OrsquoConnor
Dr Pauline Lynch
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Scotland- Using the data to improve
Mortality in child birth bull 20 of women who died were either
first booked for antenatal care after 20 weeks gestation
bull Had missed over four routine antenatal appointments
bull Or
bull Did not seek care at all
bull CMACE Saving Mothers Lives 2007
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Maternity care collaborative
The overall aims of the Maternity Care strand are to bull Increase the percentage of women satisfied with their experience of maternity care to
gt 95 by 2015 and reduce the incidence of avoidable harm in women and babies by 30 by 2015
Avoidable harm is defined by the further sub aims to bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15
bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by 30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks
gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at the booking for antenatal care
appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who are smokers to smoking
cessation services and
bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Avoidable harm is defined
bull reduce stillbirths and neonatal mortality by 15 bull reduce severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) by
30 bull reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated elective
deliveries prior to 39 weeks gestation by 30 bull offer all women carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at
the booking for antenatal care appointment bull refer 90 of women who have raised CO levels or who
are smokers to smoking cessation services bull provide a tailored package of antenatal care to all
women who continue to smoke during pregnancy
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Scottish Patient Safety Programme
fileCUsersAnnetteDesktopMEF202016Maternity20Care20-20Safe20Effective20Reliable20Care20Driver20Diagrampdf
Safe and Effective Care
Overarching Driver Diagram
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Median
53
15 Reduction
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Itrsquos a fact
Reliability does not happen by
accident it happens by design
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Failure free operation over time
David Garvin Harvard Business School
Definition of Reliability for Health Care
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
The probability that a system
structure component process
or person will successfully
provide the intended functions
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
A process is the action point for reliability When an effective process become highly
reliable the outcomes will follow as long as they are connected to science
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Framework for Reliable Design
bull Process reliability is linked to outcomes by science
bull Initial focus needs to be on reliability of process not outcomes
What are the key steps in your process
Identify potential defects
Articulate this process clearly to all
Assign roles and responsibilities
Measure process compliance and feedback progress
All or none
1 2 3
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
ALL or none
bull ldquoWhen applied to clinical processes consider the
viewpoint of the patient by invoking the all or
none measurerdquo
IHI Innovation Team
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Segmentation of the
journey
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Building a reliable process
A systems-based approach
Risk identification
Communication of risk status
Risk assessment
Appropriate preventative intervention
Ongoing measurement of process and outcome
Person and family engagement
Partnership
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Real Time Data for Improvement ndash
Process
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Reliable risk assessment of mother
Components 1 2 3 4 5 Total
compliance
1 First antenatal appointment no later
thanhellip weeks
2 Risk assessment for high risk
(smoking obesity pre-existing conditions asthma bleeding diabetes)
3 Effective communication of risk status
4 Preventative strategies in place to
minimise risk
5 Alert escalation process
Individual component compliance
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Vive la Difference
bull No matter how well designed you think
your care processes are the fact is that
lsquoto err is humanrsquo
bull Human factors will always prevail
bull Hence you need to design into the
process a safety net back up system
that will ensure that should there be a
human error the system will be able identify the issue and intervene to
avoid harmerror
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
Manchester Patient Safety Framework
A Why
waste our time on safety
B We do
something when we have an
incident
C We have
systems in place to
manage all
identified risks
D We are
always on the alert for risks that
might emerge
E Risk
management is an
integral part
of everything
that we do
PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE
Levels of maturity with
respect to a safety culture
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1
In summary we discussed
bull The social determinants of health and the impact on the
health of women and newborns
bull Key safety interventions to address adverse pregnancy
and neonatal outcomes in the United States and other
countries
bull How these interventions can be introduced
Questions
Thank You sgulloihiorg
Twittersuegullo
abartleyconsultinggmailcom Twitter annettebartley1