H2 Internal Combustion Engine Research · Purpose of work Evaluate potential of hydrogen internal...

Post on 22-Aug-2019

213 views 0 download

Transcript of H2 Internal Combustion Engine Research · Purpose of work Evaluate potential of hydrogen internal...

H2 Internal Combustion Engine Research*H Internal Combustion Engine Research2

Thomas Wallner Argonne National Laboratory

2008 DOE Merit Review Bethesda, Maryland

February 25th 2008

DOE-Sponsor: Gurpreet Singh * This presentation does not contain any proprietary or confidential information

Purpose of work

� Develop a combustion concept that – Offers excellent fuel conversion efficiencies – Produces virtually zero emissions – Achieves power density levels of modern gasoline engines – Reduces the dependence on foreign oil – Decreases green house gas emissions

2

Purpose of work

� Evaluate potential of hydrogen internal combustion engines

– Investigate hydrogen combustion concepts for additional efficiency and emissions improvements • Analyze influence of injector location • Evaluate impact of injector nozzle design

– Apply/develop diagnostic tools that allow deeper understanding of hydrogen combustion enginesunderstanding of hydrogen combustion engines • Develop correlation of chemiluminescence measurement with enggine-out NOx emissions x

– Feed information forward to multi-cylinder hydrogen engine and vehicle level application

3

Relevant DOE goals and objectives

� 45% Brake Thermal Efficiency � 0.07 g/mile NOx

� Power density similar to gasoline � $45/kW by 2010 and $30/kW in 2015

4

– -

Previous Review Comments and Actions Taken

� ‘…would like to see more analysis of the in-cylinder measurements to understand more details of the combustion.’ – Detailed analysis of in-cylinder pressure measurements Detailed analysis of in cylinder pressure measurements – Correlation between OH* chemiluminescence and engine-out NOx emissions

derived

� ‘…the project should include modeling ’ the project should include modeling. – Meetings with project partners; Simulation at Ford/Sandia – Post-doc candidate with hydrogen engine modeling experience identified

� ‘NOx levels seem very high…what the plan for NOx control was.’ – In-cylinder measures

• Multipple injjection data ppresented at last review • Optimized injector location and nozzle design • Additional measures (EGR, water injection…)

– Lean NO aftertreatment (Ford ORNL) Lean NOx aftertreatment (Ford, ORNL)

5

Barriers

� Operation with hydrogen port injection – Combustion anomalies (knock, pre-ignition) prevent

extension of high efficiency regimes towards higher engine loads

– Low power density Low power density � Operation with hydrogen direct injection

Trade off between NO emissions and power density – Trade-off between NOx emissions and power density – Trade-off between NOx emissions and engine efficiency

at low enggine loads

6

Approach (Overview) Ford Hardware

ANL Metal engine EndoscopeEndoscope

ORNL Aftertreatment

SNL Simulation

DOE Targets Efficiency/emissions

SNL Optical engine

7

Approach (Project) DOE/Partners

Targets Efficiency/ emissions

H2 enginePartners Ford engine

optimizationTools Concepts - Emissions instrumentation

- Combustion analysis - Endoscopic imaging

Concepts - Combustion strategy - Additional measures

8

ProgressHardware upgpgrade

Spark Plug

� New cylinder head installed with Central Location � Central and side injector

location for Direct Injection � Endoscope access

Side Location

Pressure Transducer

EndoscopeEndoscope

9

ProgressNovel nozzle desiggns

� SSymmetric 66 hole nozzle ffor central injection

� Asymmetric 5 hole nozzle for side i j iinjection

� 4 configurations tested: – Symmetric 6 hole central – Symmetric 6 hole side – Asymmetric 5 hole side jets up – Asymmetric 5 hole side jetsAsymmetric 5 hole side jets

down

10

Experimental resultsSampple imagges ((2000 RPM 8 bar IMEP))

6-hole central 6-hole side 5-hole side up 5-hole side down SOI=80 SOI=80 SOI=80 SOI=80

10 deg CA ATDC10 deg CA ATDC

5000 OH* Intensity [a u ]OH Intensity [a.u.]

11

Experimental resultsSampple imagges ((2000 RPM 8 bar IMEP))

6-hole central 6-hole side 5-hole side up 5-hole side down SOI=80 SOI=80 SOI=80 SOI=80

12 deg CA ATDC12 deg CA ATDC

5000 OH* Intensity [a u ]OH Intensity [a.u.]

12

Experimental resultsSampple imagges ((2000 RPM 8 bar IMEP))

6-hole central 6-hole side 5-hole side up 5-hole side down SOI=80 SOI=80 SOI=80 SOI=80

14 deg CA ATDC14 deg CA ATDC

5000 OH* Intensity [a u ]OH Intensity [a.u.]

13

Experimental resultsSampple imagges ((2000 RPM 8 bar IMEP))

6-hole central 6-hole side 5-hole side up 5-hole side down SOI=80 SOI=80 SOI=80 SOI=80

16 deg CA ATDC16 deg CA ATDC

5000 OH* Intensity [a u ]OH Intensity [a.u.]

14

Experimental resultsSampple imagges ((2000 RPM 8 bar IMEP))

6-hole central 6-hole side 5-hole side up 5-hole side down SOI=80 SOI=80 SOI=80 SOI=80

18 deg CA ATDC18 deg CA ATDC

5000 OH* Intensity [a u ]OH Intensity [a.u.]

15

Experimental resultsSampple imagges ((2000 RPM 8 bar IMEP))

6-hole central 6-hole side 5-hole side up 5-hole side down SOI=80 SOI=80 SOI=80 SOI=80

20 deg CA ATDC20 deg CA ATDC

5000 OH* Intensity [a u ]OH Intensity [a.u.]

16

Experimental resultsSampple imagges ((2000 RPM 8 bar IMEP))

6-hole central 6-hole side 5-hole side up 5-hole side down SOI=80 SOI=80 SOI=80 SOI=80

222 deg CA ATDC2 deg CA ATDC

5000 OH* Intensity [a u ]OH Intensity [a.u.]

17

Experimental resultsSampple imagges ((2000 RPM 8 bar IMEP))

6-hole central 6-hole side 5-hole side up 5-hole side down SOI=80 SOI=80 SOI=80 SOI=80

24 deg CA ATDC24 deg CA ATDC

5000 OH* Intensity [a u ]OH Intensity [a.u.]

18

Experimental resultsSampple imagges ((2000 RPM 8 bar IMEP))

6-hole central 6-hole side 5-hole side up 5-hole side down SOI=80 SOI=80 SOI=80 SOI=80

26 deg CA ATDC26 deg CA ATDC

5000 OH* Intensity [a u ]OH Intensity [a.u.]

19

Experimental resultsSampple imagges ((2000 RPM 8 bar IMEP))

6-hole central 6-hole side 5-hole side up 5-hole side down SOI=80 SOI=80 SOI=80 SOI=80

28 deg CA ATDC28 deg CA ATDC

5000 OH* Intensity [a u ]OH Intensity [a.u.]

20

Experimental resultsSampple imagges ((2000 RPM 8 bar IMEP))

6-hole central 6-hole side 5-hole side up 5-hole side down SOI=80 SOI=80 SOI=80 SOI=80

30 deg CA ATDC30 deg CA ATDC

5000 OH* Intensity [a u ]OH Intensity [a.u.]

21

980

760

870

650

-3000

-1500

-6000

-4500

Technical accomplishmentsCorrelation between NOxx and endoscoppic imagges

4500

6000

[ppm

] 6 hole central 6 hole side 5 hole side up

3000

4500

NO

x [ 5 hole side up 5 hole side down

0

1500

2000 RPM 8 bar IMEP MBT Spark Timing

� Average Peak OH* Intensity

870 explanationexplanation � Good

correlation

Aver

age

PPeak

OH

* In

teens

ity [a

.u.]

540

430

320

210

100

160 140 120 100 80 60 40Start of Injection [Deg CA BTDC]

22

NO

x EEm

issi

ons

[pppm

]

Progress

4000

3500

3000

25002500

2000

1500

1000

500

0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

IMEP [Bar]

2000 RPM Efficiency Optimized SOI MBT Spark Timing

6 hole central 6 h l id 6 hole side 5 hole side up 5 hole side down

H2 Port Injection

� Emissions levels comparable to comparable to port injection

� High loads – NOx optimization potential

23

Progress

� Improvement compared to port injection port injection

� Low loads – efficiency optimization potential

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9IMEP [Bar]

38

40

36

38

cien

cy [%

]

34

Ther

mal

Effi

c

H2 Port Injection

32

Indi

cate

d T

6 hole central 6 hole side 5 hole side up 5 hole side down

28

30 2000 RPM Efficiency optimized SOI MBT Spark Timing

24

Technology Transfer

� Multi-cylinder hydrogen direct-injection engine proposalinjection engine proposal

� Vehicle level application – Mobile Advanced Technology

Testbed (MATT) conceptTestbed (MATT) concept studies

– ETEC Silverado durability testing (NETL)testing (NETL)

– Development of test procedures with BMW Hydrogen 7 vehiclesHydrogen 7 vehicles

25

Activities for Next Fiscal Year

� Evaluate custom designed injector nozzles � Investigate in-cylinder NOx reduction measures

– Water injection – Cylinder charge motion (swirl)

� Expand operating regime to higher engine speeds � Verify H2-DI findings in a multi-cylinder DI engine

((separate proposal ffor FY08))

26

Publications

�Recently published – Lohse-Busch, H.; Wallner, T. ‘Optimized operating strategy for a

supercharged hydrogen powered 4 cylinder engine ’ JSAE/SAEsupercharged hydrogen powered 4-cylinder engine. JSAE/SAE Fuels and Lubricants. 2007.

– Wallner, T.; Lohse-Busch, H.; Shidore, N. ‘Operating Strategy for a Hydrogen Engine for Improved Drive Cycle Efficiency and Emissions Hydrogen Engine for Improved Drive-Cycle Efficiency and Emissions Behavior.’ World Hydrogen Technology Convention. 2007.

�Upcoming events – Wallner, T.; Gurski, S; Lohse-Busch, H.; Duoba, M.; Thiel, W.

‘Challenges in Fuel Efficiency and Emissions Measurements for Hydrogen Vehicles.’ NHA Annual Hydrogen Conference. 2008.

– Wallner, T.; Nande, A.; Naber, J. ‘Evaluation of Injector Location and Nozzle Design in a Direct-Injection Hydrogen Research Engine.’ SAE International Powertrains, Fuels and Lubricants Meeting. 2008.

27

t t t

Summary

� Hydrogen direct injection engine research seeks to develop a combustion concept with high engine efficiency and virtually zero emissions while maintainingg the ppower densityy of current ggasoline engines

� Main barriers are combustion anomalies with hydrogen port injection as well as tradewell as trade-offs between NOx emissions and power density and engine offs between NOx emissions and power density and engine efficiency

� Several nozzle designs for hydrogen direct injection with central and side injector location have been testedside injector location have been tested

� 2% increase in engine efficiency with hydrogen direct injection compared to port injection without NOx emissions penalty F h k ill i l d l i f ddi i l NO red ti ductions� Further work will include evaluation of additional NOx measures (water injection, swirl etc.), expansion of operating regime and testing of advanced injection concepts with optimized custom nozzles

28

H2 Internal Combustion Engine Research*H Internal Combustion Engine Research2

Thomas Wallner Argonne National Laboratory

2008 DOE Merit Review Bethesda, Maryland

February 25th 2008

DOE-Sponsor: Gurpreet Singh * This presentation does not contain any proprietary or confidential information