Post on 31-Dec-2015
description
UDM717: URBAN TRANSPORTATION: GREEN TRANSPORATATION PLANNING
0
Urban Transportation (UDM 717)
Msc. In Urban Development And Management
GREEN TRANSPORTATION AND THE IMPORTANCE OF
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING IN ACHIEVING
SUSTAINABILITY
Prepared by:
ANWAR BIN SURAN
2012977513
Prepared for :
ASSOC. PROF AHMAD SUHAIMI BIN ISMAIL
Institute Of Graduate Studies
Faculty Of Architecture, Planning And Surveying
Universiti Technology Mara
UDM717: URBAN TRANSPORTATION: GREEN TRANSPORATATION PLANNING
1
Abstract
Green transport refers to the broad subject of transport that is or approaches being sustainable. Transport
operations and logistics as well as transit-oriented development are involved. Transportation sustainability
is largely being measured by transportation system effectiveness and efficiency as well as the
environmental impacts of the system. The entire life cycle of green transport systems is subject to
sustainability measurement and optimization. Green transport systems make a positive contribution to the
environmental, social and economic sustainability of the communities they serve. Transport systems exist
to provide social and economic connections, and people quickly take up the opportunities offered by
increased mobility.
Keywords: Green Transport, Sustainable Transportation Planning
1.0 Introduction
Transportation helps shape an area’s economic health and quality of life. Not only does the
transportation system provide for the mobility of people and goods, it also influences patterns of
growth and economic activity by providing access to land. The performance of the system
affects public policy concerns like air quality, environmental resource consumption, social
equity, land use, urban growth, economic development, safety, and security. Transportation
planning recognizes the critical links between transportation and other societal goals. The
planning process is more than merely listing highway and transit capital projects. It requires
developing strategies for operating, managing, maintaining, and financing the area’s
transportation system in such a way as to advance the area’s long-term goals.
2.0 What is Green Transportation?
The Centre for Sustainable Transportation's (CST) definition of a sustainable transportation
system is one that:
i. Allows the basic access needs of individuals and societies to be met safely and in a
manner consistent with human and ecosystem health, and with equity within and
between generations
UDM717: URBAN TRANSPORTATION: GREEN TRANSPORATATION PLANNING
2
ii. Is affordable, operates efficiently, offers choice of transport mode, and supports a vibrant
economy.
iii. Limits emissions and waste within the planet's ability to absorb them, minimizes
consumption of non-renewable resources, limits consumption of renewable resources to
the sustainable yield level, reuses and recycles its components, and minimizes the use
of land and the production of noise.
Therefore, green transport is a category of sustainable transport which uses human power,
animal power, public transportation, smart design, and renewable energy. In common usage
public transport is considered a green transport option in comparison with private vehicles, as is
car pooling. But some people prefer a definition that does not include public transport or vehicle
movements which relies on non-renewable energy.
Green transport includes:
i. Walking
ii. Cycling and some other types of human-powered transport
iii. Green vehicles
a. Solar powered vehicles
b. Wind powered vehicles
c. Water powered vehicles
d. Electric powered vehicles
Often there can be a sliding scale of green transport depending on the sustainability of the
option. Public transport on traditional diesel buses uses less fuel per passenger than private
vehicles so is more green than private vehicles, but is not as green as using a hybrid electric
powered bus. It can often be useful to talk about moving a community towards the ultimate
People Walking to work Wind Powered Vehicle Smart Car (Electric Power Vehicle)
UDM717: URBAN TRANSPORTATION: GREEN TRANSPORATATION PLANNING
3
green mode transport outcomes - instead of declaring that they are there if they cross a
particular sustainability threshold. Walking across sensitive environments can often cause
considerable damage and so is not always the greenest option. Green transportation is for
reducing the environmental damage originated in individual's use of cars and light trucks.
The green transportation hierarchy is the basic concept behind transportation reform groups all
over the world such as Transportation Alternatives. The hierarchy puts city-friendly cyclists and
pedestrians first. It rewards their low cost, space efficiency, and zero environmental impact.
Trucks are not last because they perform vital commercial functions in cities. An important part
of the green transportation hierarchy is that trucks get priority over personal automobiles for
scarce curb side parking. This would eliminate many of the double-parking problems that plague
places such as the 6th Avenue bike lane.
In an ideal, many high development city such as
in New York, transportation decision-making,
allocation of road space, and project funding and
resources would reflect the green transportation
hierarchy. While we still have a long way to go,
we champion projects such as the widened
sidewalks at Herald and Greeley Square, and new
bike lanes, as important steps towards more
rational transportation planning.
Other policies that would reflect and reinforce the green transportation hierarchy include:
i. The pricing of all on-street parking in Manhattan south of 96th Street
ii. Tolls on bridges and tunnels
iii. Congestion pricing
iv. Parking policies that prioritize commercial needs over personal autos
Sustainable transportation can be supported by promoting the use of:
i. more energy efficient forms of transportation such as public transit
ii. alternative transportation to the single occupancy vehicle
iii. low emissions vehicles
Green Transportation Hierarchy
UDM717: URBAN TRANSPORTATION: GREEN TRANSPORATATION PLANNING
4
iv. transportation demand management
v. active transportation, and
vi. supportive land use practices.
2.0 The Importance of Transportation Planning in Achieve Sustainability
Transportation planning plays a fundamental role in the state, region or community’s vision for
its future. It includes a comprehensive consideration of possible strategies; an evaluation
process that encompasses diverse viewpoints; the collaborative participation of relevant
transportation-related agencies and organizations; and open, timely, and meaningful public
involvement.
Transportation planning is concerned with identifying and planning for the accessibility needs of
people and freight within livable and sustainable communities. Transport planning therefore
takes into account the desirable social, environmental, economic outcomes and develops
strategies to achieve those outcomes within planning frameworks.
2.1 The Traditional Transport Planning Process
Transport planning is usually focused on specific problems or on broad transport concerns at a
local level. It has been traditionally a preoccupation of lower tier governments, such as the state
or municipality. Because of this fact, transport planning is most developed in the urban sphere,
Sustainable and well plan commuter
UDM717: URBAN TRANSPORTATION: GREEN TRANSPORATATION PLANNING
5
and it is there where most experience has been gathered. The planning process, however, has
a number of similarities with the policy process. Identifying a problem, seeking options and
implementing the chosen strategy are essential steps in planning too. Because it tends to deal
with localized problems, the solutions adopted in transport planning tend to be much more exact
and specific than policy directives.
For a long time been planning was a field dominated by traffic engineers who gave it a distinctly
mechanistic character, in which the planning process was seen as a series of rigorous steps
undertaken to measure likely impacts and to propose engineering solutions. There were four
major steps: Trip generation, trip distribution, modal split, and route selection. They involved the
use of mathematical models, including regression analysis, entropy-maximizing models, and
critical path analysis.
There are many reasons why the results of these models should be treated with caution:
i. They are only as good as the data they manipulate and many times the data is
inaccurate or incomplete.
ii. They are based on assumptions that the mathematical relationships between variables
remain constant.
iii. They can be manipulated to produce the outcome that the analyst knows the client
prefers.
iv. Because the predictions were rarely subjected to subsequent evaluation, their validity is
largely questioned, and the modeler is happy to predict the future since projections
rarely question the validity of the methodology.
The predictions of future traffic flows produced by the four stage sequence are then used to
identify planning options. Since the most common prediction of the modeling is that present
capacities will be unable to cope with traffic growth, the tendency has been to produce planning
solutions that call for an expansion of capacity. This has been referred to as predict and
accommodate. It is the solution that has typified so much urban transport planning from the
1940s to the 1980s. It has given rise to the enormous expansion of highway construction that
reinforces the dominance of the automobile. Rarely are there post mortems of the prediction
models, and as has been learned by empirical observation, the issue of induced demand has
distorted the actual traffic.
UDM717: URBAN TRANSPORTATION: GREEN TRANSPORATATION PLANNING
6
2.2 Contemporary Transport Planning
In cities traffic problems have increased significantly since the 1970s, despite a great deal of
urban transport planning. There is a growing realization that perhaps planning has failed and
that the wrong questions have been asked. Rather than estimate traffic increases and then
provide capacity to meet the expected growth, it is now accepted that what is required is better
management of the transport system through new approaches to planning. Just as urban
planning requires the inputs of many specialists, transport planning is beginning to utilize multi-
disciplinary teams in order to broaden the scope of the planning process. Planning is still a
multi-step process, but it has changed considerably:
a. Goals and objectives.
While the goal of traditional transport policy, improving accessibility, is still useful, it has
to be considered in the context of other desirable goals. For instance improving safety
and health, reducing emissions from vehicles, improving equity, enhancing economic
opportunities, improving community livability, promoting mobility are all valid. But which
goal(s) are pursued results in a very different planning process.
b. Options.
Given the possible range of goals that transport planners have to consider, it becomes
necessary to provide a set of possible options. Several objectives may be desirable, and
thus it is important to consider what they imply. Several scenarios may have to be
considered, and they must become important components of the planning process.
c. Identification of actors, institutions, stakeholders.
Given that transport planning has the potential to influence so many elements of society
- economic wellbeing, environmental conditions, social integration – it is important that
those affected by the transport problem and its potential resolution should be identified
so that they can be engaged.
d. Predicting outcomes, identifying benefits, and assessing costs.
The stage of predicting the outcomes for each of the options is a critical step in the
process. Models continue to play an important role, but whereas the traditional models
were based on the number of trips, increasingly modeling is becoming more activity
based. Transport is seen in the context of scheduling household decisions in time and
UDM717: URBAN TRANSPORTATION: GREEN TRANSPORATATION PLANNING
7
space. Demographic and social data are used extensively, and the mathematical models
have become more sophisticated.
e. Choosing course of action.
Evaluation of the scenarios has to consider the costs and benefits from the frequently
conflicting perspectives of the stakeholders and actors. Extensive public consultation
may be required. The information has to be disseminated and explained so that an
informed public can participate in the debate.
Planning is commonly scale specific and multidimensional.
2.3 Transport Demand Management
In rejecting the former paradigm of building capacity, transport planners have turned
increasingly to managing both demand and the transport system. Building roads has produced a
car-oriented society in which the other modal alternatives have little opportunity to co-exist. Car
ownership is beyond the ability of the transport planner to control directly and the question
remains if it should. But car use and ownership is affected by land use and density, both
elements that planners can affect.
High population densities, in particular, favor walking, bicycling and public transit use. It is for
this reason that a great deal of attention in planning is being paid to densification and
integration. This includes concentrating development along well served transport corridors
(transit oriented development) and increasing densities in areas undergoing rehabilitation.
Managing the demand for transport is made up of a large number of small interventions that
cumulatively can impact of car use, but in particular improve the livability of cities. A sample of
well-practiced and successful interventions includes:
a. Park and ride.
Parking spaces are provided, usually close to an expressway, where drivers can board
busses that provide service to the city center. This has become a staple feature in the
outer zones of many US and British cities. Its success is variable, however, and there is
UDM717: URBAN TRANSPORTATION: GREEN TRANSPORATATION PLANNING
8
some evidence from the UK that park and ride may actually increase car use, as people
who may have used regular bus services now use their cars to drive to the car parks.
b. Traffic calming.
Measures that seek to reduce the speed of vehicles in urban areas, such as speed
bumps and street narrowing. For residential streets the goal is to make their use by car
drivers unattractive because of the obstacles, for thoroughfares the objective is to
reduce the average speeds. The measures indicate the need for much greater attention
to street design and layout.
c. Priority lanes for busses and high occupancy vehicles.
Lanes on major thoroughfares and expressways that are reserved for busses, taxis and
passenger vehicles with several occupants. This has become an important feature of
transport planning in North America, where major highway expansion projects offer
priority lanes. The goal is to encourage use of busses and high occupancy vehicles that
can be seen to travel at higher speeds along the reserved lanes by other drivers who
may be stuck in traffic jams.
d. Alternate work schedules.
Encouraging work hours other than the dominant 9 to 5 schedule. One of the great
problems in transport planning is that demand is concentrated in two main peak periods.
In the past, efforts were made to meet this demand by increasing road capacity, which
was never sufficient, and resulted in an under use of the capacity the other 20 hours
each day. Promoting flexible schedules and encouraging telecommuting are policies that
are seeking to spread out the demand for transport over more hours and even reducing
the demand altogether.
e. Promoting bicycle use.
In some countries, particularly the Netherlands, the bicycle is an important mode of
travel. It is a green and healthy mode, but in automobile dependent cities, the bicycle
does not share the roads easily with trucks and cars. Encouraging greater use of the
bicycle requires significant planning adjustments, such as the provision of bicycle lanes
and bike stands.
UDM717: URBAN TRANSPORTATION: GREEN TRANSPORATATION PLANNING
9
f. Car sharing.
Encouraging drivers to share car use with neighbors or co-workers.
g. Enhancing pedestrian areas.
In most cities vehicles dominate the streets. In many areas of high population density,
the quality of life (enhanced safety, less pollution etc.) and the visual attractiveness of
streetscapes can be enhanced by excluding vehicles from streets altogether, or limiting
access to public transport vehicles. In Europe this has become a distinctive feature of
the historic cores of many cities.
h. Improving public transit.
For fifty years or more public transit use as declined in most cities. Yet it is the only
major alternative to the car in these cities, and thus enhancing the use of transit has
become a major planning objective. Improvements include making transit more
attractive, by improving bus schedules and improving the appearance and comfort of
transit vehicles and stations.
i. Parking management.
Restricting on-street parking and charging higher rates for parking.
Intelligence Highway System Well plan parking Management
UDM717: URBAN TRANSPORTATION: GREEN TRANSPORATATION PLANNING
10
2.4 Benefit Sustainable Transportation Planning (Commuter based)
Economic Benefits
i. Save money on gas. Driving 18,000 km per year costs an average of $9,525 per year or
52.9 cents per kilometer (Canadian Automobile Association 2004 national average for a
2004 Chevrolet Cavalier Z-24).
ii. Reduce health care costs. It is estimated that transportation-related emissions will cost
the health care system $11 billion to $38 billion between 1997 and 2020 (Transportation
Association of Canada, 1998).
iii. Save tax. Reduce roadway construction and maintenance costs.
Community Benefits
i. Active and sustainable transportation makes the community safer by reducing the risk of
vehicle-pedestrian accidents.
ii. Increase social interaction within the community, resulting in much improved personal
relationships and community health.
iii. Support community-based businesses, such as local shops, restaurants, bakeries and
newsstands.
iv. Decrease traffic noise like engines and horns, or sprockets and bells
v. Reduce traffic jams and parking hassles.
Environmental Benefits
i. Active and sustainable transportation keeps air clean by improving air quality and
reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
ii. Reduce toxic air pollution. Pollutants from many transportation sources aggravate
respiratory disease, and contribute to property damage and acid rain.
iii. Reduce the threat of climate change. This is because, it takes 130 trees to produce the
amount of oxygen needed to combat the carbon dioxide emitted from one car each year.
iv. Conserve natural habitat. Fewer cars on the road decrease the demand for more roads
and parking lots, allowing more land for green space.
v. Driving less reduces the need for non-renewable fossil fuel resources.
vi. Reduce ozone layer destruction. Did you know that motor vehicle air conditioners are the
world’s single largest source of CFC leakage into the atmosphere? (Zielinski, 1995).
UDM717: URBAN TRANSPORTATION: GREEN TRANSPORATATION PLANNING
11
3.0 Conclusion
Sustainable transport planning systems make a positive contribution to the environmental,
social and economic sustainability of the communities they serve. Transport systems exist to
provide social and economic connections, and people quickly take up the opportunities offered
by increased mobility. The advantages of increased mobility need to be weighed against the
environmental, social and economic costs that transport systems pose. Green vehicles are
intended to have less environmental impact than equivalent standard vehicles, although when
the environmental impact of a vehicle is assessed over the whole of its life cycle this may not be
the case. Electric vehicle technology has the potential to reduce transport CO2 emissions,
depending on the embodied energy of the vehicle and the source of the electricity.
UDM717: URBAN TRANSPORTATION: GREEN TRANSPORATATION PLANNING
12
List of References
Jeon, C M; Amekudzi (March 2005), "Addressing Sustainability in Transportation Systems: Definitions,
Indicators, and Metrics", Journal Of Infrastructure Systems: 31–50
Cities and Automobile Dependence: An International Sourcebook, Newman P and Kenworthy J, Gower,
Aldershot, 1989
Heather L. MacLean and Lester B. Lave University of Toronto. "OECD’s Economic Assessment of Biofuel
Support Policies".
Brinkman, Norman; Eberle, Ulrich; Formanski, Volker; Grebe, Uwe-Dieter; Matthe, Roland (2012-04-15).
"Vehicle Electrification - Quo Vadis". VDI.
Ellis, Cliff. "Lewis Mumford and Norman Bel Geddes: the highway, the city and the future". Planning
Perspectives 20 (1): 51–68.
Kenworthy, J R Transport Energy Use and Greenhouse Emissions in Urban Passenger Transport
Systems : A Study of 84 Global Cities Murdoch University
Ewing, R and R Cervero (2001). "Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis" (PDF). Transportation
Research Record, 1780: 87-114. 2001. Transportation Research Record 1780,87-114.