Post on 26-Dec-2015
GPs – Vital Role in Safeguarding Children
Dr Junaid Oluseyi SoleboAssociate Specialist in Paediatrics
Named Doctor for Safeguarding ChildrenBHRUT
Feb 2010
Introduction
GPs have a vital role in the protection of children Be aware of their responsibilities As care provider, be able to recognise and respond to
CP Shift of responsibility for child protection to PCTs Government’s determination to change things for
children for the good and for good
Key Position
GPs Enjoy an enhanced role in health provision Provide majority of child health surveillance See significant proportion of childhood illness Have extensive knowledge of the family background First point of Contact for most health problems Unusual for a child not to be registered with a GP GPs, well placed at surgery’s consultation, home visits,
treatment rooms sessions, child health attendance and have information from other staff (HV, Midwifes, Practice Nurses)
Local Procedure and Policy
Be aware of local procedures Referral pathways Documentation Named/lead Professionals for Child
Protection How to contact Named/Lead Professionals How to contact Social Workers/other
agencies
Obstacles to identifying child maltreatment
(These must not stop healthcare professionals from acting to prevent harm to the child)
Concern about missing a treatable condition Fear of losing a positive relationship with a family Discomfort of disbelieving, thinking ill of, suspecting or
wrongly blaming a parent or carer Divided duties to adult/carers and breaching confidentiality Understanding of the reason why maltreatment have occurred
and no intention to harm child Losing control over child protection process and doubts about
its benefits Stress personal safety Fear of complaints
The Scale of The ProblemResearch showed if all forms of injury in childhood are
analysed, then NAI is common. 7% of children experienced serious physical abuse – by parents/carers 1% , sexual abuse by parents/carers 3%, sexual abuse by another relative 11%, sexual abuse by people unrelated, but known to the children 5%, sexual abuse by stranger 6%, serious absence of care at home 6%, severe emotional abuse 16%, severe maltreatment by parents/carers 55% of fatally abuse have been seen within the previous month by a healthcare Non-accidental head injury, more common in babies and toddlers
36 per 100,000 in <6 mth of age, 14-24 per 100,00 in < 1 yr and 0.3-3.8 in 1 -2 yrs.
Standard for Radiological Investigations of suspected NAI. RCPCH March 2008
CHILD FATALITIES Between 1995 and 1997, 78% of these children were less than five years
old, while 38% were under one year of age.
Deaths 44% of deaths resulted from neglect, 51% from physical abuse, 5% from a combination of neglectful and
physical abuse
41% of these deaths occurred to children known to child protection service agencies as current or prior clients
Some Statistics 570,220 referrals to social services in England in 2003 4,109 reported offences of cruelty or neglect of children
2002/3 Every year, 30,000 children names ‘Registered’ in England
2500 in Wales, and 2000 in Scotland NSPCC Information Briefings April 2004
Hobbs estimates At least 150,000 children a year suffer sever physical
punishment likely to cause harm to their development 100,000 children a year have potential harmful sexual
experience
Hobbs C , Physical Abuse In Protecting Children from Abuse and Neglect in primary Care,2003
RCPCH Research Division –march 2003
of 3879 practicing/just retired paediatricians
536 (13.6%)-complaints related to Child Protection
79% of complaints dealt with locally 8% went to independent review 11% referred to GMCYet we must act firstly in the best interest
of child and secondly the family
GPS LOTH TO REPORT CHILD ABUSEBMJ 1999 (16TH JANUARY)
Doug Payne in Dublin found that of the five GPs interviewed in depth not one had a copy of the health department’s child abuse guidelines and that two “were completely unaware of their existence”.
Of the 72 referrals for abuse, only 4 had been made by GPs, and in all cases the GPs were only passing on concerns OF the children’s parents.
GPs also expressed reluctance to become involved with Social Workers, Police, or others engaged in the system
Essential aspects of child protection
Accurate diagnosis
Timely Intervention
Appropriate Intervention
50% chance of repeated abuse if no intervention 31% chance of repeated abuse within 3 years following
intervention
Arch Dis Child Jan 2004
Every Child Matters
(Integrated working is the key focus)Five outcomes for children: Be healthy Stay safe Enjoy and achieve Make a positive contribution Achieve economic well-being
Child Protection Training
GPs should take part in child protection
Have regular updates as part of their postgraduate education
GPs as ‘employers’ to ensure that others attend training
Safeguarding Children Training
Level 1
All staff working in healthcare settings (clinical and non-clinical) should be trained to this level. They should:
• Understand what constitutes child abuse.• Know the range of physical abuse, emotional
abuse, neglect and sexual abuse.•Know what to do when they are concerned that
a child is being abused
Level 2
All clinical and non-clinical staff who have regular contact with parents, children and young people should be trained to this level. They should:
Be competent at level 1.• Be able to recognise child abuse.• Be able to document their concerns.• Know who to inform.• Understand the next steps in the child
protection process
Level 3
All staff working predominately with children, young people and parents should:
Be competent at level 2.• Have knowledge of the implications of key national documents/reports.• Understand the assessment of risk and harm.• Understand multi-agency framework/assessment/investigation/working.• Be able to present child protection concerns in a child protection
conference.• Demonstrate ability to work with families where there are child
protection concerns.• Be able to put into practice knowledge of how to improve child
resilience and reduce risks of harm.• Understand forensic procedures/practice.• Where appropriate, be able to undertake forensic procedures.• Be able to advise other agencies regarding the health management of
child protection concerns.• Be able to contribute to serious case reviews or equivalent process.
3 ways to be involved
Direct contact with a child or his/her careers.
Approach by social services to provide information about a child
Asked to carry out a specific type of assessment
The Victoria Climbié Inquiry (Jan 03)
Health Analysis Information was known but not recorded Recorded information was not shared Information was passed verbally and not recorded Actions were agreed without making anyone
responsible for carrying them out Actions were put off and not completed Actions were assumed to be complete but not
checked Actions were recorded but ignored
Summary of the contact that health professionals had with Baby P
6 visits by to an acute hospital.
14 visits to the GP practice 1 to the child health service,
5 visits by a health visitor 6 visits to the child health
clinic 2 visits to walk-in centres
1 contact with the midwife
Review after Baby P (March 09)
Systemic failings in a number of areas leading up to the death of Baby P, in particular:
Poor communication between health professionals and between agencies, leading to a lack of urgent action with regard to child protection arrangements, and no effective escalation of concerns.
Lack of awareness among some staff about child protection procedures, and a lack of adherence, by some staff, to these procedures.
Poor recruitment practices combined with lack of specific training in child
protection, leading to the risk of some staff being inexperienced in the arrangements to protect the safety of children.
Shortages of staff,, leading to delays in seeing children. This included shortages in consultants, nurses and administrative staff.
Failings in governance in the trusts concerned.
Care Quality Commission: Review of the involvement and action takenby health bodies in relation to the case of Baby P 36
Care Quality Commission – Core Standards
The core standards relevant to this report for all health organisations are:
1. Safeguarding children: To protect children by following national child protection guidance within their own activities and in their dealings with other organisations (standard C2).
2. Recruitment and training: Ensure that staff are appropriately recruited, trained and qualified for the work they undertake (standard C11a).
3. Mandatory training: Ensure that staff participate in mandatory training programmes (standard C11b).
4. Professional development: Ensure that staff participate in further professional and occupational development (standard C11c).
5. Public health partnerships; Promote, protect and demonstrably improve the health of the community served, and narrow health inequalities by cooperating with each other and with local authorities and other organisations (standard C22a)
National Review of health services for children
The Healthcare Commission’s (now called Care Quality Commission) review of services for children in hospital use the following criteria for review.
Children have access to child-specific services. Children have access to care that is local to
their homes. Services are staffed by appropriate levels of
trained staff. Staff have child-specific training. Staff have the opportunity to maintain their
skills
Key Documents to support The role of Primary Care in the protection of children form
abuse and Neglect. RCGP 2002 Laming. The Victoria Climbie Enquiry. 2003.
Recommendations Every Child Matters. 2003 What to do if you ‘re worried a child is being abused. 2003 The children Act 2004 The National Service Framework for children, Young
People and Maternity. 2004 Working together to safeguard children. DoH 1999, 2006,
2010 Child Death Review Panel. April 2008
Aims of Policies Raising Standards Improved information sharing More effective working between professionals A more child and family sensitive service Supports for children Common core skills for all who work with
children Improved accountability and integration of
services
Issues for all Confidentiality and Sharing Information (BMA, Human Rights Act, 1998. Working Together 1999.
2004)
1. Patients are entitled to confidentiality2. A doctor’s legal and ethical duties to maintain confidentiality3. A doctor in possession of information relating to a third party who
might pose a continuing risk to child
Disclosure of such information will be justified in the public interest in relation to protecting a Child.
Issues for all - Referral
If the child is in immediate danger, 1. Child’s safety is paramount
2. Consider hospital admission 3. Involve Community Based Services 4 Always communicate with parents/carers 5. YOUR RESPONSIBILTY includes verbal referral, followed within
2 working days in writing
Issues for all - Referral
If Child is not thought to be in immediate danger
1. Inform parents/carers unless this would compromise the child safety2. Obtain a full history3. Record the information, where possible, verbatim4. Check with the community based Services.5. Consult as appropriate with colleagues (Designated paediatrician)6. Still refer if child is at risk
Referral
Should be made by telephone to the appropriate Access or Assessment Team
Should be followed in writing within 2 working days Document reason for a decision NOT to proceed/refer If unsure MUST REFER
Issues for all - Record Keeping
Copy of Referral Form should be in child’s medical record
Ensure records are Timed, Dated and Accurate. Good practice to keep records of incident/allegation, any discussion and reason why action was taken
Report on the examination, indication where, when and why child was examined, details of injuries
Best Practice to include child’s full name, dob, address, main carer, school, GP’s name.
Issues for all – Attendance at Child Protection Conference
Information sharing with community based services when enquires are made about a child
To be involve in child protection plan If attendance is not possible, to submit a written report
Important Areas
Recognition Procedures Communication and Partnership Record Keeping
Where to seek advice/Guidance
Designated Doctor Designated Nurse Named Doctor Named Nurse Team Manager, Children’s Service
For Every Case A full history Documentation of the history (verbatim from informant) An examination of the whole body, inc weight and
height A Register check Discuss with other relevant professionals Seek advice and consult with Named/Designated doctor A Decision on if injury or observed symptom could be
abuse A Decision on further action Referral, verbal followed by written
Discussions (in groups)
Symptoms in a child suggesting abuse Symptoms in parents that could lead to child
abuse Barriers to information sharing and reporting Barriers to further engagement
Areas of Potentially Serious Concerns
Failure to thrive Failure to attend immunisation/hearing test without
explanation Failure to attend hospital outpatient appointments Inappropriate use of out of hours service or A & E Troubled/Multiproblem Families – chronic health, poor
housing, long term unemployment, petty crime, domestic violence,
some addictions and substance abuse. Acutely distressed families – struggling but coping until some
final overwhelming incident precipitated child abuse. Single parent, immature parents, physical illness or disability.
Questions
Thank you