Post on 09-Feb-2021
Page 1
GMESGMES DownstreamDownstream ServicesServices
Marine Water Quality Information ServicesAQUAMAR
FP7-SPACE-2009-1 / Collaborative project N° 241759
MyOcean User Workshop / CUG meeting,
April 7-8, 2011, Stockholm
Stéphane Pierotti, Thales Alenia Space FranceMUMM
Page 2AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
AquaMar versus recommendations from 1st CUG
Recommendations addressed by AquaMar
R1 The downstream GMES projects (AQUAMAR, FIELD_AC) will have this role ofdownscaling the service to coastal areas and providing additional relevant products…
Development of 5 experimental services in AquaMar, in complement to the(pre)operational MarCoast services
R2 The perspective of an operational service that will provide easy access to a series ofinformation products related to the state of the marine environment is welcomed by theuser’s community.
Development of a WQ Information System including (service/product catalogue, web-based service validation process, interface with MyOcean catalogue and validation tools,user feedback features…)
R3 MyOcean products should be accompanied with quality indicators. There is a need forproducts validated through well documented procedures and if possible with uncertaintiesestimates.
Definition and implementation of Validation process supervised by a Validation Bureau(AVB), supported by the AquaMar Information system and Validation tools
Page 3AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
Aquamar services lines
Indicators for the reporting requirement of the Water Framework Directive andthe European Marine Strategy
The products derived from Earth Observation are that the product quality is not sufficient inthe near coastal zone, which is concerned by the WFD, namely 1nautical mile. Further, thebasic product, Chl-a, is one contribution to the quality index required by the WFD, but itwould be desirable to get products which are closer to the reporting requirements. Based onthis, the objectives of this work package are to get:
(1) better ocean colour products in the WFD coastal area, i.e. 1nm off the coastalbaseline:
(2) one step closer to WFD indicators as compared to chlorophyll-a, improved P90
Composite front mapComposite front map
Frequent frontsFrequent fronts
Synoptic front chart
Warm
Str
ong
Weak
Cold
Key
Synoptic front chartSynoptic front chart
Warm
Str
ong
Weak
Cold
KeyWarm
Str
ong
Weak
Cold
Key
1st CUG R1
Page 4AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
Aquamar services lines
Detection of harmful algal blooms (HAB)
The present (H)AB detection services that exist through Europe are based on daily satellite-derived chlorophyll a imagery, possibly supplemented with information from in situmeasurements.. These (H)AB detection and forecasting services are limited by the lack ofinformation on species/harmfulness, on low biomass harmful species and on below-surfaceinformation that can be extracted from satellite measurements. Model forecasts can givespecies and depth profile information but are limited in reliability. In situ measurements givea very sparse coverage of any region.
AquaMar proposes to improve existing (H)AB detection and forecasting services bydeveloping methods to supplement satellite chlorophyll-based services withspecies/harmfulness information.
MERIS CHL a (11.4.2010)[ACRI-ST]
Algae Bloom detection[MUMM]
Airborne photo7.4.2010 [MUMM]
Phaeocystis globosa?
1st CUG R1
Page 5AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
Aquamar services lines
Support to large scale marine infrastructures
New infrastructure projects are continuously under development in the coastal and marine environment.Bridges, off shore wind mill parks, harbours, gas pipelines, artificial beaches, etc. are planned andunavoidably involve risks of environmental impacts. Such risks must be assessed; and design andoperations must be optimised to reduce the impacts to an acceptable level. As a basis for the impactassessment, the baseline conditions have to be clarified. Compliance monitoring shall document theenvironmental state before, during and after construction works and supports planning of construction (e.g.in extreme events stopping dredging operations if selected environmental quality thresholds are exceeded).
Presently, most commonly baseline, impact and compliance monitoring are based on in situ data andhydrodynamic and ecosystem modelling. AquaMar will demonstrate ways to integrate EO derivedinformation in EIAs (environmental impacts assessments) of large scale marine infrastructures (i.e. inevaluations of baseline and effects); as well as in the consecutive monitoring.
Ecological model for forecastingModelling of Chl with flexible mesh up to 10-20m resolution
1st CUG R1
Page 6AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
Aquamar services lines
Bathing waters indicators
The water quality for bathing waters is mainly driven by regulation under the terms of the EU Directive2006/7/EC for “bathing water quality” and will require entry into force for “Bathing Water profiles”characterisation in 2012. This directive is to be applied by the appropriated national or regional or even localauthorities of each member states. Today, baseline, impact and compliance monitoring are based on in situdata and there is neither real use of Earth Observation nor use of modelling excepted for punctual impactstudies.
AquaMar will put the focus on 3 applications that are the analysis of the correlation between EO-derivedquantity (CDOM, turbidity, Kd, Secchi depth) and the bacteria concentration in waters, the contribution ofthe Earth Observation and modelling to the derivation of Bathing Water profiles and the estimation ofcyanobacteria concentrations from assimilation of MERIS Full Resolution into an ecological model.
Modelling Data: 3D Oceanic model; Meteorological model;Discharges and bacterial content discharged at outfalls, river
discharges
Extraction of synthetic information for decision-makers
1st CUG R1
Page 7AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
Aquamar services lines
Aquaculture precision farming
Water temperature, water transparency, oxygen and phytoplankton abundance(amongothers) are key environmental parameters related to well being of the farmed fish,optimisation of feeding schemes as well as of the impact of the aquaculture on thesurrounding marine environment.
Satellite based data, in situ on site observations and high resolution (nested) modelling andpredictions will be integrated in a web-based information system for management of thefarm site location.
MERIS Full Resolution algorithms will be developed and adapted for local scale assessments,assimilation schemes for integration of high resolution dynamic modelling and ocean coloursatellite data, and information systems sampling relevant data (monitoring, remote sensing,modelling) and disseminating operational HAB info.
A flexible web-based distributed GIS solution willallow integration of various on-site available
informationMERIS Fine Resolution data, ESA products (04.09.2010)
1st CUG R1
Page 8AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
Needs identified toward MyOcean (1/2)
AquaMar uses
MyOcean products as a direct key input in the services processing chains
From the Ocean Colour TAC
From the Sea Surface Temperature TAC
From the In Situ TAC
MyOcean models outcomes from the MFC as boundary conditions of the Aquamarlocal scale models
1st CUG R1
Page 9AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
Needs identified toward MyOcean (2/2)
baseline and standard ocean state productsboundary and initial ocean state conditions
Global.European Basins
daily / hourly fieldsHindcast (H), Nowcast (N), Forecast(F) and Re-analysis (R).
5-25 kmModel
bio-chemical data (Chl-a, Nutrients, O2 )Available mid-2010
Global.European Basins
Real Time AnalysisRe-Analysis
N/AIn Situ (*)
Temperature and salinity fieldsGlobal.European Basins
Real Time AnalysisRe-Analysis
N/AIn Situ (*)
Global.European Basins
Daily (NRT). Historical data for 20years.
1-4 kmSST
chlorophyll-a concentration (mg/m3)particulate back-scattering coefficient at 443 nm(m-1)diffuse attenuation coefficient at 490 nm (m-1)coloured dissolved and detrital organic materialsabsorption coefficient (m-1).Fully normalised water leaving radiances at xxxnm (mW/cm²/µm/sr) where xxx= 412, 443, 490,510, 531, 550-565, 620, 665-670, 681 and 709nm
Global.Pan European,European Basins
Daily (NRT), weekly, monthly andyearly fields from 1997.
1-4 kmOceanColour
NotesArea coverageTemporal frequency/coverageResolutionProductTheme
1st CUG R1
Page 10AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
Products Access and Distribution techniques
Product Access and Distribution techniques
Aquamar will collaborate with MyOcean as a key user of the MCS. An intermediate layerinterfacing with the MyOcean Service desk interface, will be developed by Aquamar toprovide MyOcean products to all Aquamar Service providers in a suitable format and relevantdelivery requirements.
New distribution channels for Earth Observation products will be proposed to new, untappeduser segments, in particular the mass media and the public.
ex. of mobile web application foreseen to distribute Water quality services
1st CUG R2
Page 11AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
MyOcean-AquaMar interface – Concepts
Main concepts
The targeted objective of the development of the MyOcean-AquaMar interface is tohave an operational tool which will be the starting point of a delivery service: itsrole shall be to take from MyOcean the data required as input by a serviceprocessing chain, in an automatic and independent way from the Service Provider
This operational tool should be easily adaptable and configurable for fulfilling thevariety of products and metadata needs of the services under R&D in AquaMar
No User Interface should be required
v1 of the interface should not do any pre-processing of the MyOcean products, butsimply will allow to exploit the existing capabilities of MyOcean (e.g. cut over anarea of interest)
Initially v1 and v2 of the interface foreseen, for adaptation to MyOcean V0 and V1.Since only the latter is suitable for automatic products retrieval, v2 will bededicated to implement some improvements and/or tune the interface
1st CUG R2
Page 12AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
MyOcean-AquaMar interface – Implementation
The interface tool (v1) consists mainly of two logical layers:
1) Application layer, composed of: Interface to MyOcean Delivery System: the software that provides forwarding download
requests to MyOcean repository (via batch scripts) Job Scheduler: its goal is to schedule the download mechanism to run daily, weekly, and so
on, depending on the products and the partners’ requirements Dispatcher: its goal is to deliver to each partner the required products in the required place
(ftp directory, http repository, etc.)
2) Data Layer, composed of: The products retrieved from MyOcean: they will constitute the “AquaMar-MYO Products
Catalogue” The associations of the products and metadata to be retrieved versus each the AquaMar
Partner (WP3) and the way of delivery
• The interface will be an automatic tool implemented in Java and makes use of aPostgreSQL database. So in its v1 doesn’t require a user interface.
• The v2 of the interface would make use of some administrator/user tools that can beintegrated into the AquaMar IS
1st CUG R2
Page 13AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
MyOcean-AquaMar interface – Improvements
Improvements foreseen for the v2 of the MyOcean-AquaMar interface:
1. Use of the MyOcean automatic emailing system for alerting the correspondingservice provider when a product is not available for any reason. This improvementrequires that the emails from MyOcean should follow a pre-defined structure toallow automatic parsing of the email received -> cooperation with MyOcean
2. A Web Console to view in real time the download processes status and to allow toan administrator to change the job scheduler behavior e.g. in case of aborteddownloads
3. Implementation of CS-W ISO functionalities: to query MyOcean catalogue forobtaining information on products not already downloaded and that can beretrieved after a coded request from a SP (e.g. products which have a timelinebefore the AquaMar’s system starting point). It would be extremely useful to beable to get not only the metadata of found products, but for example also aphysical link to get the product -> cooperation with MyOcean (question sent)
4. Front-end interface for service providers: a user-friendly way to update thecorresponding information in the interface database (e.g. partners/productsassociation, products parameters, etc)
1st CUG R2
Page 14AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
Services and products Quality evolution
Basic validation concept
1st CUG R3
Initial service
Validation report
Improved Service
Service validation
Suggestionsforimprovements
Service validation
Implementation of the concept
Validation of the newly developed products and services, as well as service delivery is ofcritical importance for the acceptance of the services by the users and hence the basis for asustainable business.
Experimentations with users and service providers will be supported by the AquaMarinformation system integrating components developed within the project, such as users accessmanagement, services cataloguing, validation reports workflow, etc.
Page 15AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
Aquamar validation process
Main objectives
1. To enable a comprehensive and transparent assessment of Aquamarservices with special emphasis to user requirements,
2. to determine possibilities to improve the quality of services and products and
3. to enable an objective comparison of services providing similar products.
In order to organize and steer the validation process for Aquamar services a
dedicated Aquamar Validation Bureau (AVB) has been set up.
Page 16AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
Aquamar Validation Bureau (AVB)
Role of the Validation Bureau (BC, DHI, MUMM, SYKE):
1. Definition of quality criteria for Aquamar services
2. Definition of a validation concept for AquaMar (1) novelalgorithms and (2) the resulting products and services,driven by user requirements
3. Definition of a quality improvement concept for AquaMar
4. Implementation of a process realizing the validationconcept
5. Continuous improvement of the validation and qualityimprovement concept by regularly reviewing theachievements, gathering feedback from users, researchpartners and service providers.
6. Summarizing the outcomes of the validation process.
„Validation protocoland qualityevolution document“and „Validationprocess definitiondocument“
Ongoing activityduring projectlifetime
1st CUG R3
Page 17AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
Validation process definition 1st CUG R3
Page 18AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
More about AquaMar…
Page 19AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
Introduction to AquaMar
AquaMar - Marine Water Quality Information Services
FP7-SPACE-2009-1 / Collaborative project N° 241759
Project submitted in December 2008 / Work program: “Stimulating thedevelopment of downstream GMES services”
16 partners
Duration: 36 months
Total project cost: 4 875 K€, Grant: 3 499 K€
Project start: 1st April 2010
EC Project Officer: Paola Chiarini (REA)
Project Coordinator: Stéphane Pierotti (TASF)
Page 20AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
Project objectives
Build a reference technical body at European scale for water quality services,service quality management and services validation.
Address EU policy directives and international conventions and support users likethe European and national monitoring agencies, industries operating in coastalwaters support. EC WFD directive (2000) -
Marine Strategy Directive - (EMS) (2008) .
EC Bathing waters directive (2006)
EIA - Environment Impact Assessment Directive (1985, amended in 1997) :
The EU ICZM Recommendations (2002)
Regional Seas conventions:Helsinki (Baltic Sea); Oslo and Paris (NE Atlantic) , Barcelona(Med. Sea)
Go beyond the state of the art with improved products and novel services, toaddress new markets and to develop a legal and economic framework for anopen partnership of service providers.
Develop and provide downstream services built on Marine Core Service (MCS) andother relevant data products, expected by end-users
Page 21AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
Scientific & Technical objectives
1. R&D activity to support novel downstream servicessupport novel downstream services: Indicators for the reporting requirement of the Water Framework Directive and the
European Marine Strategy Algal bloom forecasting Support to large scale marine infrastructure Services supporting the Bathing Water directive monitoring Aquaculture precision farming
2. Build a sustained technical collaboration with the MCSsustained technical collaboration with the MCS for end-to-end services,validation and quality optimisation
3.3. Federate the User communityFederate the User community at large4. Propose, agree and implement a service quality validation processservice quality validation process5. Propose, agree and implement a process to harmonize service quality evolutionprocess to harmonize service quality evolution6. Disseminate best practices to the service provider’s community at large
R&D results on information products Service validation process Service quality evolution process
7. Demonstrate impact of the proposed actions on the sustainability of the servicenetwork at European scale
Page 22AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
Activities proposed
Scientific development of new methods forinnovative products: Scientific/technical descriptions of new algorithms,
products & services, including the definition of the MCSinterface, tools and techniques
Preparation to service sustainability, evolution and newsensors
Development & provision of a Service portfolioincluding 5 novel products lines
Technical implementation & validation Definition of the Validation & Quality process &
procedures
Architecture design and implementation of theinformation system to provide a unified access to:Validation & Quality process data model; downstreamservice portfolio; MCS interface tools
Experimentation with end-users
Dissemination, exploitation and AquaMar Servicesnetwork expansion Preparation of the future of AquaMar services (business
model, marketing, data policy, training)
Increase of the service portfolio
Page 23AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
Who are the users of AquaMar?
Cluster “Pôle Mer PACA”
End-users involved in the project
A Users and Customers Executive Board (UCEB) composed by committed end-users will provide anoverall assessment of the expected value and impact of the service portfolio on their specificobligations, activities, and business context and development.
End-users served by the GSE MarCoast 2 project
End-users will benefit from Aquamar results through the MarCoast services provision
European citizen
On all European beaches, the blue flag that signals good quality of bathing water comforts families.Securing water quality is a key European priority. Beyond health benefits, Aquamar will also bringeconomical added value (e.g. aquaculture, infrastructure impact at coast).
Aquamar UECB
Page 24AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
3. Service and product description
General characteristics
Spatial extent
Parameters
Page 25AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
3. Service processing / Failure modes
Data flow diagram Failure mode and risk ranking
Page 26AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
3. Validation of geophysical services
Water quality Services, which provide quantitative measures, such aschlorophyll, temperature, transparency or turbidity. These productsgenerally can be validated by matchups with insitu data (daily – weekly)using regression and correlation analysis as well as xy-transect or timeseries plots.
Chl-a p90: in situ vs MERIS (2007-2009)
y = 1.0559x + 6.0468
R2
= 0.6884
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00
Chl-a (µg/l) -in situ-
Ch
l-a
(µg
/l)
ME
RIS
-
Transect 1 MC
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Longitude
Ch
loro
ph
yll
Co
nc
en
tra
tio
n[m
g/m
³]
chl_mean_mc CTD-Haardt-Chl [Volt]
Page 27AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
3. Validation of classification services
Services, which provide classifications, e. g. Water Framework Directiveeutrophication categorization, algal bloom risk indicator maps or habitatindicator maps.
Results will be compared with independent data using contingency tables.
Page 28AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
Cooperation with other projects and initiatives
On-going projects
New services lines and improved validation techniques will be taken up by MARCOAST (GSE)GMES project, a key activity on water quality services, derived from space borne oceancolour radiometry measurements, in Europe using a large scale provision of Marine CoreServices (MCS) through MyOcean (FP7) project, and of coastal service through Coastcolour.
Access to satellite data
Aquamar will benefit from the GMES Space Component Data Access (GSC-DA) project in theframe of the FP7 space programme as part of the European Space Policy focusing oncoordinating the access to space-based observation data to support GMES services.
Page 29AquaMar MyOcean User Workshop – 2nd CUG, 7-8 April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Aquamar. All Rights Reserved
Further information at:
http://www.aquamar-fp7.eu
This project has received EC research funding