Global Team for Irrigation in Africa ME 463 Students: Tim Bond, T. Reid Gray, Jeremy Koehler, Erin...

Post on 13-Jan-2016

212 views 0 download

Tags:

Transcript of Global Team for Irrigation in Africa ME 463 Students: Tim Bond, T. Reid Gray, Jeremy Koehler, Erin...

Global Team for Irrigation in Africa

ME 463 Students: Tim Bond, T. Reid Gray, Jeremy Koehler, Erin Potrzebowski, Tyler Williams

Purdue UniversityNational University of Rwanda

Assessment TripJanuary 5 – 14, 2009

Global Team Technologies

Where: Kigali, Rwanda; Butare, Rwanda; Gashora Sector, Bugesera Region, Rwanda

Our mission is to “develop an agricultural irrigation system to aid in reducing poverty in the Gashora Sector of Rwanda using environmentally,

socially, and economically sustainable design practices.”

Research

GTIA Mission Statement

Tasks Accomplished: •Met NUR teammates•Established team expectations•Met with Bugesera farmers•Defined initial customer requirements•Visited Rwandan suppliers•Met with government officials •Created preliminary budget, task list, and timeline

Using technologies to overcome communication obstacles:• GlobalHUB: online global

teaming & collaboration website• Livescribe Pulse™ Smartpen:

digitized design notebooks• Weekly chat-room meetings

using GMail™’s built-in chat features

Global Irrigation Simulator

•Extraction• Petrol Pumps• Solar Pumps• Hand Pumps• Treadle Pumps•Movement• Pipes• Hoses• Junctions•Storage

• Tanks• Pits• Trenches•Distribution• Buckets• Furrows• Sprinklers• Drip

Field Dimensions

PumpData

Crop Data

Labor Data

PartCost

Calculating Cost/Revenue of

farm

Calculating Operating Cost of

Systems

Calculating Capital Cost of

Systems

Performance Curves

Summary of Results

General Inputs

Objectives:• Provide a method of summarizing research and

analysis for future projects• Determine the feasibility of irrigation on any hillside

field• Determine profit, operating cost, and capital cost• Allow relaxation of constraints • Different crops/water requirements, different field

dimensions, different labor situations, etc…• Highlight direct areas for improvement

Conclusions and Results:• User friendly interface with easy to change inputs• Recommended system is tabulated in a bill of materials• Output graphs provide clear and concise summaries of

the results

Global Team for Irrigation in Africa

ME 463 Students: Tim Bond, T. Reid Gray, Jeremy Koehler, Erin Potrzebowski, Tyler Williams

Purdue UniversityNational University of Rwanda

Assessment TripJanuary 5 – 14, 2009

Global Team Technologies

Where: Kigali, Rwanda; Butare, Rwanda; Gashora Sector, Bugesera Region, Rwanda

Our mission is to “develop an agricultural irrigation system to aid in reducing poverty in the Gashora Sector of Rwanda using environmentally,

socially, and economically sustainable design practices.”

Research

GTIA Mission Statement

Tasks Accomplished: •Met NUR teammates•Established team expectations•Met with Bugesera farmers•Defined initial customer requirements•Visited Rwandan suppliers•Met with government officials •Created preliminary budget, task list, and timeline

Using technologies to overcome communication obstacles:• GlobalHUB: online global

teaming & collaboration website• Livescribe Pulse™ Smartpen:

digitized design notebooks• Weekly chat-room meetings

using GMail™’s built-in chat features

Global Irrigation Simulator

•Extraction• Petrol Pumps• Solar Pumps• Hand Pumps• Treadle Pumps•Movement• Pipes• Hoses• Junctions•Storage

• Tanks• Pits• Trenches•Distribution• Buckets• Furrows• Sprinklers• Drip

Field Dimensions

PumpData

Crop Data

Labor Data

PartCost

Calculating Cost/Revenue of

farm

Calculating Operating Cost of

Systems

Calculating Capital Cost of

Systems

Performance Curves

Summary of Results

General Inputs

Objectives:• Provide a method of summarizing research and

analysis for future projects• Determine the feasibility of irrigation on any hillside

field• Determine profit, operating cost, and capital cost• Allow relaxation of constraints • Different crops/water requirements, different field

dimensions, different labor situations, etc…• Highlight direct areas for improvement

Conclusions and Results:• User friendly interface with easy to change inputs• Recommended system is tabulated in a bill of materials• Output graphs provide clear and concise summaries of

the results

Field Dimensi

ons

PumpData

Crop Data

Labor Data

PartCost

Calculating Cost/

Revenue of farm

Calculating Operating Cost

of Systems

Calculating Capital Cost of Systems

Performance Curves

Summary of Results

General Inputs