Post on 30-Dec-2015
description
Q: Why is heterogeneous accretion unlikely?
Two end member hypotheses for core formation:
A: In a gas of solar composition, silicates and iron metal (it IS a reducing environment!) condense over similar ranges in T,P.
Estimated core sizes of the terrestrial planets.
Two end member hypotheses for core formation:
For homogeneous accretion, when does the onset of differentiation occur?
Once you have ages, can look for short-lived excesses:
Hf/W ideal, since Hf is lithophilic, while W is a siderophile & 1/2 = 9 Myr.
Yin et al. (2002)Kleine et al. (2002)
Ages highly model dependent! More in a bit…
Models here assume complete equilibration…
Geochemical partitioning is sensitive to the depth at which silicates last “see” Fe/Ni metal.
The atmosphere is also strongly affected by core formation, and its timing.
Need to know how large an incoming differentiated planetesimal can be and still equilibrate…
Answer seems to be pretty small! Means that full equilibration is unlikely…
The atmosphere is also strongly affected by core formation, and its timing.
Equilibrium Gas Abundances in Silicate MagmasSiO2 + 2Fe3O4 → 3Fe2SiO4 + 02
SiO2 + 2Fe + O2 → Fe2SiO4
Might the exogenous delivery of organics to the early Earth been important?
Equilibrium Gas Abundances in Silicate Magmas
SiO2 + 2Fe3O4 → 3Fe2SiO4 + 02 Quartz Fayalite Magnetite (QFM)
SiO2 + 2Fe + O2 → Fe2SiO4 Quartz Iron Fayalite (QFI)
Giant impacts & the Earth-Moon System:
1. Temperature behavior
R. Canup 2004, Icarus 168, 433 (and the slides that follow)