Gaps and Limitations in Atmospheric Modeling of the Water Cycle

Post on 13-Feb-2016

34 views 3 download

description

Gaps and Limitations in Atmospheric Modeling of the Water Cycle. Minghua Zhang Stony Brook University, SUNY. The Scales. The Dynamics. (Williamson 2006) . ( Nastrom and Gage 1985) . SMET. CAM4. Rainfall Frequency at ARM TWP. 12 UTC July 23, 2002. 21 UTC July 23, 2002. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Gaps and Limitations in Atmospheric Modeling of the Water Cycle

Gaps and Limitations in Atmospheric

Modeling of the Water Cycle

Minghua Zhang

Stony Brook University, SUNY

1. The Scales

2

The Dynamics

3

(Williamson 2006) (Nastrom and Gage 1985)

SMET CAM4

Rainfall Frequency at ARM TWP

(Lombardo et al. 2012)

12 UTC July 23, 2002 21 UTC July 23, 2002

6

Radar WRF (2km)

(Lombardo et al. 2012)

(Lombardo et al. 2012)

Precipitation mixing ratio

1. The range of spatial and time scales of precipitation

far exceeds what current models can describe.

9

Two possible approaches:

Parameterization: unproven, and unlikely succeed

High resolution: how high?

Yet, features at these scales are important to the water

cycle.

2. The Processes

10

11

00 UTC December 14, 2001

(Colle et al 2008)

WRF (24 hr)NCEP

SUNYSBMicrophysics

ThompsonMicrophysics

Mixing Ratio ofCloud liquidCloud IcePrecipitation

(Colle et al 2008)

2. Some of the key processes are still not

characterized.

13

The requirements:

More comprehensive observations

Knowledge on the asymptote of these processes

Yet, these processes are important to the water

cycle.