Post on 02-Jun-2018
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
1/55
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
2/55
Short bio
CEO of the Online Hate Prevention Institute An Australian charity that combats all forms of online hate e.g. Racism,
Homophobia, Cyberbullying etc
We run http://fightagainsthate.coman online reporting tool for cyber-hate
Senior Member of the IEEE Chair, Student Awards Committee, IEEE Computer Society
Region 10 Coordinator, IEEE Computer Society
MDC Victorian Section
PhD in Computer Science, Lancaster University (UK)
LLM(Juris Doctor), Monash University (Australia)
More: www.oboler.com | www.ohpi.org.au
http://fightagainsthate.com/http://www.oboler.com/http://www.ohpi.org.au/http://www.ohpi.org.au/http://www.oboler.com/http://fightagainsthate.com/8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
3/55
F.C. Kohli, The Information Society
Systems must operate in many environments -Technical, economic, social and political, as theyinteract with culture, history, heritage and traditions.
A systems success depends on how it integrates andharmonises new systems and techniques with theenvironment.
Thus, to successfully implement the systems
approach, it is critical to look at the system, its parts,problems and growth holistically, without isolating itfrom its environment and with out simplifyingcomplexities.
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
4/55
Lawrence Lessig: Code Is Law - On Liberty in Cyberspace1
Every age has its potential regulator, its threat to liberty.
Ours is the age of cyberspace. It, too, has a regulator. This regulator, too,threatens liberty. But so obsessed are we with the idea that liberty means"freedom from government" that we dont even see the regulation in thisnew space. We therefore dont see the threat to liberty that this
regulation presents.
This regulator is codethe software and hardware that make cyberspaceas it is. This code, or architecture, sets the terms on which life incyberspace is experienced. It determines how easy it is to protect privacy,or how easy it is to censor speech.
unless we understand how cyberspace can embed, or displace, valuesfrom our constitutional tradition, we will lose control over those values.The law in cyberspacecodewill displace them.
1 http://harvardmagazine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-html)
http://harvardmagazine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-htmlhttp://harvardmagazine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-htmlhttp://harvardmagazine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-htmlhttp://harvardmagazine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-htmlhttp://harvardmagazine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-htmlhttp://harvardmagazine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-htmlhttp://harvardmagazine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-htmlhttp://harvardmagazine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-html8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
5/55
Lawrence Lessig: Code Is Law - On Liberty in Cyberspace1
In some contexts, for some, this unregulability is a virtue. This feature of
the Net, for example, protects free speech. It codes a First Amendment
into the architecture of cyberspace, because it makes it relatively hard for
governments, or powerful institutions, to control who says what when.
Butin other contexts, in the view of others, this unregulability is not a
virtuetake the German government confronted by Nazi speech, for
example, or the U.S. government faced with child pornography. In these
contexts, the architecture disables regulation as well. But in thesecontexts, unregulability is viewed as a vice.
1 http://harvardmagazine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-html)
http://harvardmagazine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-htmlhttp://harvardmagazine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-htmlhttp://harvardmagazine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-htmlhttp://harvardmagazine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-htmlhttp://harvardmagazine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-htmlhttp://harvardmagazine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-htmlhttp://harvardmagazine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-htmlhttp://harvardmagazine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-html8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
6/55
LETS LOOK AT SOME ISSUES...
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
7/55
Online hate speech
Hate speech is speech or expression which is capable of instilling
or inciting hatred of, or prejudice towards, a person or group of
people on a specified ground including race, nationality, ethnicity,
country of origin, ethno-religious identity, religion, sexuality,
gender identity or gender - Gelber and Stone (2008)
Online Hate Speech is simply hate speech that iscommunicated via the internet. Some forms of it (but
not others) are unlawful in different legal jurisdictions.
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
8/55
Racial Vilification (S18C RDA)
Lawsaffecting
contentregulatio
nandFiltering
Racial Discrimination Act 1975(Cth) S18C:
(1) It is unlawful for a personto do an act, otherwise than in private, if:(a) the act is reasonably likely, in all the circumstances, to offend, insult, humiliate or
intimidate another personor a group of people; and
(b) the act is done because of the race, colour or national or ethnic origin of the
other personor of some or all of the people in the group.
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/rda1975202/s5.htmlhttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/rda1975202/s5.htmlhttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/rda1975202/s5.htmlhttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/rda1975202/s5.htmlhttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/rda1975202/s5.htmlhttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/rda1975202/s5.html8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
9/55
Racial / Religious VilificationRacial and Religious Tolerance Act 2011 (Vic):
S7/(S8): A person must not, on the ground of the race(religious belief or activity) of
another person or class of persons, engage in conduct that incites hatred against,
serious contempt for, or revulsion or severe ridicule of, that other person or class of
persons.
Lawsaffecting
contentregulatio
nandFiltering
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
10/55
Racist Griefing
William John Bligh was a 9 year old Aboriginal child from Queensland who died in tragic
Circumstances in February 2013.
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
11/55
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
12/55
Impact of hate speech on Society
Legal scholar Jeremy Waldron (2012) argues that
hate speech:
undermines the public good of inclusiveness in society
becomes embedded in the permanent visible fabric ofsociety and victims assurance that there will be no need
to face hostility, violence, discrimination, or exclusion by
others in going about their daily life vanishes
Hate speech undermines democracy and preventsparticipation in society
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
13/55
Impact of hate speech on individuals
Exposure to a higher level of racism is correlated with Greater emotional harm
Higher infant mortality
Lower life expectancy
Greater levels of substance abuse
Greater levels of truancy from school
Research shows that racism can cause physiological stress i.e.It has physical effects impacting health as well as the mental
harm it causes
The American Journal of Public Health had a special issues onthe heath impacts of racism in May 2012
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
14/55
The value add from the internet
A Canadian court in 2006 said the Internet changed the slow,insidious effect of a relatively isolated bigoted commentary... [in]toa form of communication having a widespread circulation
Racism can be posted anonymously, which may make respondingimpossible, there is a power imbalance between an indentifiedresponder and an anonymous instigator
Individuals can be targeted by a virtual mob, the volume making
any meaningful response impossible (death by a 1,000 cuts)
The hate can flow across borders creating difficulties for lawenforcement who may lack authority to gather the evidence theyneed
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
15/55
The Online Environment In a famous US court case in 1996 it was said that:
[c]ommunications over the Internet do not invade an individual'shome or appear on one's computer screen unbidden -American CivilLiberties Union v Reno, 929 F. Supp. 824, 844 (E.D. Pa. 1996)
The Internet has changed and today search engines and socialmedia can cause hate speech to appear unbidden
It is more comparable to Waldrons concern re: hate speech
being embedded in society, and a person being unable toengage in society without a level of anxiety.
Online the embedding of hate occurs quite literally with
websites, Facebook pages, etc becoming part of the internet
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
16/55
The Chain of Accountability
What responsibility should rest with those providing
the tools that are abused to spread hate?
A social media platform, like Facebook or YouTube, which
hosts content or communities spreading hate? The internet connectivity provider (ISP) connecting the
user to the internet?
The internet service provider who providing hosting?
A company whose network is used to spread hate?
What can they do to mitigate their risk and limit their
liability?
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
17/55
TERRORISM & EXTREMISM
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
18/55
Leigh Rigby
Lee Rigby was a British soldier who was hacked to
death in London on May22nd 2013.
Last month it was revealed that a social media
company had data on one of the killers, and ifauthorities had this data, the murder could have
been prevented
There were also trolls who used his death to cause
public outrage, over 100 people called the British
police about one Facebook page
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
19/55
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
20/55
Mehdi Masroor Biswas (@samiwitness)
In the early hours of Saturday morning Police traced
the owner of the @samiwitness twitter account and
arrested him
The account had over 17,000 followers and postedbeheading videos, and interviews with people going
to fight for ISIS (before they left and after)
It was run out of India by an Engineering graduate,
and focused on promoting ISIS to the UK and EU
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
21/55
Background on @samiwitness "I haven't waged war against anybody. I just said stuff,
people followed me, then I followed them back and thenwe talked".
Charged under Section 125 of the Indian Penal Code, the
provision prohibits the waging of war, attempted wagingof war, or abetting the waging of war with any Asiaticpower in alliance or at peace with the Government ofIndia.
Biswassrole in spreading propaganda for ISIS via Twitteris very clearly a modern form of support for the wagingof war.
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
22/55
ISIS Attack in Australia 15/12/14
Gunmen took people, including children, hostage in a
Lindt chocolate shop in Sydney on Monday morning
The hostages were made to hold a black ISIS flag
A Facebook page was created almost immediately insupport of the terrorists
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
23/55
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
24/55
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
25/55
A free software problem
The image hosting site focused on Freedom...
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
26/55
THE RESPONSIBILITY OFPROFESSIONALS
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
27/55
Professional ethics
Social media platforms, and their systems for internally handling hatespeech, are all built by Computer Professionals. Management may alsobe Computing Professionals.
Members will improve the understanding of technology; itsappropriate application, and potential consequences; IEEE code of ethics
Members will avoid harmto others and Improve publicunderstanding of computing and its consequences ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct
Software engineers shall act consistently with the public interest andSoftware engineers shall act in a manner that is in the best interestsof their client and employer, consistent with the public interest
Joint IEEE Computer Society / ACM Code of Ethics for Software Engineers
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
28/55
The Ethics vs Law Challenge
Hate Speech Unlawful (outside the USA)
UN Treaties ICCPR Art 20(2). Any advocacy of
national, racial or religious hatred thatconstitutes incitement todiscrimination, hostility or violence shall
be prohibited by law.
ICERD Art 4 obliges states to criminalisehate speech
National laws against racism E.g. Laws implementing the above
treaties
Additional Protocol to theConvention on Cyber Crime
Hate Speech is Protected Speech (USA)
Racism is not an exceptionto the 1stamendment
The speakers freedom of speechisconsidered more important than the
listeners freedom from abuse or fromvilification
There is a concern (distrust) aboutgiving the Government power to limitspeech.
This only applies to speech, action(e.g. Discrimination in employment)
is unlawful.
But online activity is pure speech, and US companies hold the data...
In the case of online hate speech, this difference of opinion over hate speech has a real impact
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
29/55
...Impact on Policy
US Companies cannot be sued in the US (where theirassets are) over breaches of other countries laws
Most companies today only have a minority of users inthe USA (18% in North America for Facebook)
US Companies CANban hate speech. The FirstAmendment only prevents the government FORCING
them to do so, it doesnt stop them doing so
So they ban hate speech voluntarily, which allowsthem to say they comply with laws outside the US
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
30/55
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
31/55
The Human Computer Interaction Challenge
We know the design of an interface can make it more(or less) likely that a person will use a certain productof feature
On Amazon you can purchase with a single click
On Facebook:
The reporting system has between 5 and 7 steps
Certain types of reporting options are buried behind termslike other (you wont find them without help)
A step late in the reporting process requires you to chooseto report the item, without this (which is optional) noreport happens
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
32/55
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
33/55
TACKLING THE PROBLEM
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
34/55
New problems & solutions to content problems
Experts need to be able to identify the hard cases
A hard case is anything the platforms arent respondingto correctly...
...so we need to monitor how they respond
Were back to the scale problem, but now we can solve itwith: Cloud computing
Crowd sourcing but we nneed to overcome crowds lack of technical knowledge
The aim is only to identify the outliers for the experts to process The volume of outliers can be manage by serving them to an
expert crowd for expert processing
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
35/55
The Fight Against Hate software solution
A Crowd Sourcing solution
Overcomes difficulties around recognition
Creates problems of bias, ignorance and game playing
An artificial artificial intelligence (AAI) solution
Such solutions have been used for other problems by the
likes of Amazon (e.g. Amazon Mechanical Turk), and since
the 18thCentury [6]
Effectively using humans as agents, as we
would do with software agents
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
36/55
The process
Users report the URL of online hate
They classify it
They review items reported by others
In both review and classification they express an opinionover the nature of the content, and their confidence in
their opinion
A points system favours strong opinion that are correct,
and weaker opinions that are wrong
Points are adjusted on verification of the content by the
system (based on the crowds opinion) or by an expert
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
37/55
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
38/55
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
39/55
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
40/55
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
41/55
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
42/55
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
43/55
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
44/55
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
45/55
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
46/55
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
47/55
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
48/55
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
49/55
Examples of Statistics Available
Items reported over time Increase in items by social media platform
Trends over time by hate type
Time taken to remove items
Average time to remove item by platform
Trends in reports by state/country
Responsiveness by platform
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
50/55
The need for engagement Without computing expertise, the problem of online hate in
social media cant be properly addressed
Online hate causes real harm, and it is made possible by thetechnology
There is an ethical obligation on those building such platforms
to address these problems There is a need for independent computer scientists, not
subject to the vested interest of the companies, to: research and report on how the problem is being addressed
Explain what is / is not technically possible by way of solutions
Laws reform, informed by technology expertise, is needed inthe area of evidence, privacy, and platform accountability(perhaps like pollution laws)
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
51/55
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
52/55
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
53/55
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
54/55
8/10/2019 Freedom With Responsibility (Expanded)
55/55
THANK YOU, QUESTIONS?