Post on 23-Jan-2016
description
Mark-UpDraft 1
As tabled from July 19
Frankfort City Comprehensive PlanMeeting, August 23, 2006
2
Documents – frankfortonline.org
7/13/2006 Adobe.pdf
Comprehensive Plan Draft 1 for printing [164 pp]
7/12/2006 MS Word
Comprehensive Plan Draft 1 [164 pp]
7/12/2006 MS Word
Survey Results [12 pp]
3
Draft 1 – July 12, 2006
4
TOC [Table of Contents] – 10 parts some rearrangement for Draft 2
PART I. Introduction– TOC– Executive Summary– Updating the Comprehensive Plan
State mandate Time Period
– Vision Statement– Planning Process– Acknowledgements
Reorganized
PART II. Community ProfileA. LocationB. ClimateC. History
D. Demographic Analysis, Forecasts & Comparisons1. Age Cohorts
2. Race3. Ethnicity
4. Education5. Forecasts
A. Frankfort City past 20 yearsB. Frankfort City past 10 yearsC. Frankfort City past 3 years
D. Clinton County past 10 yearsE. Hamilton County past 10 years
F. Lebanon City, Boone County past 3 yearsG. Lafayette City, Tippecanoe County past 3 years
H. Cohort Survival [basis: fertility rates, mortality rates, net migration]E. Socioeconomic Analysis, Forecasts & Comparisons
1. Labor Force2. Employment
3. Household Income4. Income by Industry
New to Draft 2
PART III. Growth Management
A.Managing Sprawl Brought by New Development
B. Common Sense Zoning
C. Infrastructure Placement
D. Farming Community Identification
E. Enhanced Tax Base
F. Community Identification
G. Growth Pattern[East or West?]
Land UseA. Agriculturalb. Residential
1. Core Residential2. Traditional Residential3. Multifamily Residential
C. Downtownd. Commercial
1. Neighborhood Commercial2. Community Commercial
3. Regional Commerciale. Industrial
1. Light Industrial2. Manufacturing
3. High-Tech R&DF. Public UsesG. Institutional
H. Planned DevelopmentA. Planned Unit
B. Planned ResidentialC. Planned Commercial
D. Planned Industrial
Future Land Use MapZoning Map
SR 28 West Overlay District MapExisting Land Use Map
Downtown Land Use MapIndustrial Park Land Use Map
New to Draft 2
PART IV. PlacemakingVision
A. Neighborhood IdentificationB. Reutilization of Downtown
C. Managing Sprawl Brought by New Development
PART V. Community LivingA. Abandoned SchoolsB. Neighborhood LivingC. Zoning Enforcement
D. Community CohesivenessPART VI. Community Green
A. Class Three Wind AvailabilityB. Landfill Capacity
C. Frankfort Association of Community Trails (FACT)D. Landscaping Ordinance/Storm-water Ordinance
PART VII. City BeautifulVision
A. Tree City ProgramB. Utility Lines
C. Abandoned Big-BoxD. Adopt an Entrance
PART VIII. Economic Revitalization
Economic AnalysisEconomic Condition
Economic BaseIndustry Clusters [Agglomeration Effect]
Analysis of DemandAnalysis of the Factors of Production
Economic PerformanceGrowth/ Decline of Economic Indicators
Shift-Share AnalysisOverall Economic Development Strategy
Economic Revitalization ProjectsBrownfield RedevelopmentDowntown Revitalization
SR 28 Corridor – Redesign & Adaptive Reuse
Economic Development HousingEco-Industrial Park
Bio-Refinery Industry
New to Draft 2
8
TOC - End
PART IX. AccessA. Emergency Management
B. Public TransportationC. Alternative TransportationD. Downtown Vehicular Flow
Thoroughfare PlanContext Sensitive Design
Street hierarchy1. Arterial streets
2. Collector streets3. Local streets
Regional Thoroughfare PlanPURPOSE
GOALSNational Highway System
PART X. Summary Conclusions
A. Problems, Goals & ObjectivesB. Strategies, Projects & Policies
C. Call for Planning & Development1. Community Development Plans2. Economic Development Task
Force3. Strategic Alliances and Corporate
Sponsors4. Legislation
New to Draft 2
Draft 2 Major Elements added to Draft 1Projections and GIS Mapping
8 assumptions constitute 8 scenarios [or less]Done
Future Land Use Map
Conventional zoning for existing uses
Largely planned developments for growth areas
Standards formulated for
planned developments
“performance zoning”
Started, not completed
Add Bio-Refinery strategy to Economic Revitalization Started, not completed
Executive Summary By choice, remains for the end
PART X: Summary Conclusions Done and on-line [16 pp.]
More graphic elements
E.g., thoroughfare plan ROW cross-sections
E.g., historic population changes [past 50 years… since last comp plan
ROW Done, subject to review;
History remains
10
Draft 3 as Final Draft
Adobe InDesign replaces MS Word– Very reader-friendly– More graphical– Expanded pages
All corrections from Draft 2 from 9-16-06 Opportunity for detail mark-up by public
officials that are consistent with 9-16-06 resolutions of stakeholders
Schedule as Revised7-19 Review Draft 1 + Survey Results
Direct ICC Staff on Draft 2
Postponed
8-23 Review Draft 1 + conduct survey among stakeholder group + consider Plan of Hispanic Communities [?]
Direct ICC Staff on Draft 2
9-16 Review Draft 2 + survey results of 3 groups [general public, Hispanic, stakeholders]
10-11 Review “Final Draft” in InDesign with acceptance as a stakeholders’ statement
Formulate lobbying strategy for adoption of Plan
October Plan Commission acts on Comp Plan
November City Council acts on Comp Plan
December City Council considers zoning amendments
12
PART X: Summary Conclusions
Refer to document [16 pp.] Note Well Hispanic 7-point program relevant
to Spanish-speaking minority population [pp. 14-16]
7-Points – Spanish-Speaking Communities of Frankfort English education for adults; bi-lingual support through key governmental operations
until the success of English education Subsidized or free legal services in landlord-tenant relations, perhaps taking the
form of arbitration or mediation resolutions. Active recreational [soccer, baseball] and cultural programs aimed at the needs of
Hispanic people. The acquisition and conversion of Kyger ES and the defunct Wal-Mart as a public facility for community meeting, recreation, health care, and cultural/ art exhibitions and workshops, but inclusive of Hispanic needs, should be explored.
Seek the cooperation of existing lenders to extend credit to Hispanic households and businesses; counseling of Hispanic households and businesses in the establishment of credit, in housing management, and in business management akin to the programs of La Plaza in the Indianapolis metropolitan area; if necessary, establish Hispanic-oriented credit unions, SBA Certified Development Corporations and other institutions to finance the projects of Hispanic households and businesses.
Establishment within the City of an Ombudsperson Office to advocate for the needs, objectives and projects of various citizens, community associations and businesses. That advocacy includes an active grants procurement operation involving intergovernmental aid, and aid to private organizations, households and businesses.[1] Further, the ombudsperson may assist in procuring local programs and other resources, and in recommending to the Mayor and Council measures to remediate the problems faced by ordinary citizens and organizations.
As a multicultural bridge to establish social, recreational and cultural events that combine the Anglo and Hispanic communities of Frankfort. These events recognize the positive impact of the annual summer downtown festival in Frankfort revolving on multicultural food, entertainment and merchandizing.
Continued education and organization of Hispanic communities politically and socially in addressing these indigenous needs, toward the common good of the City, and with the aim of integrating Hispanic peoples in their multicultural neighborhoods and city.
[1] grants/ subsidies/ low cost lending, credit enhancement, etc.through public agencies and corporate foundations; available through “Resources for Indiana Communities In Housing, Community & Economic Development,” a publication of the Indiana City Corporation
14
Findings by ICC Spanish-Speaking Staff
Saddened by absence of integration, and quite self-deprecating– “Hispanic and Anglo people don’t share the use of public spaces.
When Hispanics arrive, the Anglos leave.”– Fatalistic [“nothing will change to make our lives better”]– “afraid”
Emphasis on social service needs [contrast to stakeholder interests]
– Legal services– Health care– Family counseling/ abuse/ day care– Financial counseling– Public transportation– More and better jobs [‘like Lebanon”]
15
Population Forecasting
Based on Alternate Assumptions of Change Past 20 Years 2025– Frankfort 18,000– Clinton [not Howard] County 16,200– Lebanon 20,400– Lafayette 21,500– Hamilton County 36,800
16
Frankfort Current Population
Maps Key Current Population Population Growth (1=10) Population Decline (1=10)
18
Population drops by 227
Frankfort Population 2010
19
Frankfort Population 2015
Population grows by 2,352
20
Frankfort Population 2025
Population drop by 506
21
22
Frankfort Population 2010
Population remains the same
23
Frankfort Population 2015
Population grows by 838
24
Frankfort Population 2025
Population drops by 1,206
25
26
Frankfort Population 2010
Population grows by 475
27
Frankfort Population 2015
Population grows by 2,472
28
Frankfort Population 2025
Population grows by 1,020
29
30
Frankfort Population 2010
Population grows by 1,184
31
Frankfort Population 2015
Population grows by 3,559
32
Frankfort Population 2025
Population grows by 371
33
34
Frankfort Population 2010
Population grows by 5,210
35
Frankfort Population 2015
Population grows by 5,923
36
Frankfort Population 2025
Population grows by 9,042
Graphics on ROW’s for Thoroughfare Plan + Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances
Residential Street + Feeder Street
– ASHTO New Standards [adopted by NJ as RSIS]
– Strictly subdivision streets
– Small variance with the graphics to follow
Curb to Curb > Feeder Residential
No On-Street Parking
2 Travel Lanes
10+10 = 20’
20’
One-side parking
2 travel lanes
10+10+8 = 28’
26’
Two-side parking
2 travel lanes
10+10+8+8 = 36’
32’
28’
38
Local Residential Street Standards
Residential Street
39
Local Residential Street Standards
Residential Feeder
40
Local Resident Street Standards
Access Street
41
Local Non- Resident Street Standards
Option A
42
Local Non- Resident Street Standards
Option B
43
Local Non- Resident Street Standards
Option C
44
Local Non- Resident Street Standards
Option D
45
Neighborhood Collector Street Standards
Option A
46
Neighborhood Collector Street Standards
Option B
47
Major Collectors
Option A
48
Major Collectors
Option B
49
Major Collectors
Option C
50
Minor Arterials
Option A
51
Minor Arterials
Option B
52
Minor Arterials
Option C
53
Major Arterial
Option A
54
Major Arterial
Option B
55
Standards
Planned Development– PUD– PRD– PCD– PID
Performance Zoning
56
Performance
Broad or Narrow range of uses
Intensities and some uses conditioned on “performance”
Performance = Impact on neighboring properties neighborhood city as a whole
Evaluation of impacts [positive and negative] constitutes a “grade” [e.g., 75 of 100]
Very sophisticated
While traditional zoning specifies allowable land uses in each district, performance zoning specifies standards of land use intensity that are acceptable in each district. Performance zoning focuses on the performance of the parcel and how it impacts adjacent lands and public facilities, not on the use of the land. This gives municipalities and developers more flexibility in designing projects, because the use of a property is not restricted as long as the impacts to the surrounding land are not negative (as defined in the specific regulation).
ZONING
57
Performance Standards
Performance Zoning Model Ordinance Bucks County, Pennsylvania
Natural Resource Protection Standards Open Space & Recreational Standards [NRPA] Architectural Design Standards Community Facilities and Associated Cost Responsibilities Fiscal Impact e.g.,
– Offsite infrastructure– School District Costs
Other Public Amenities e.g.,– Art– Mixed Use [commercial and residential]– Non-gated [public access]– TOD [transit]
Example [Passing Score = 70?]
Factor [8, or more?] Max Points
Conformance to height/ bulk/ setback/ parking standards of ordinances
25
Open Space [passive/ active with facilities] 10
Energy efficiency and sustainability 10
Architectural Design 5
Art and Public Amenities 5
Affordable Set-Aside 15
Off-site Improvements [Capital Costs Avoided] 20
Residential Needs in Neighborhood Retail + Jobs and Income Generated
10
59
Applications for PUDs
The PUD philosophy can be used for residential, commercial, and even industrial developments.
Essentially a “planned unit” with mixed uses = – campus setting for industrial– antithesis of strip commercial and integration with
other uses [office, residential lofts, etc.]– “planned communities” for residential
60
Possible Requirements
The city can require that developers:– Incorporate greenspace– Create and/or maintain roadways for the
development– Plan for water runoff– Have a mixed income housing (for residential
developments)
61
Possible Benefits
Higher standards for development, with emphasis on planned communities
Greater opportunity for developers to create attractive and inviting developments.
More opportunities for the city to allow for construction projects that might not have been possible under more traditional regulations.