Post on 25-Mar-2016
description
FISAC VARIATIONS. RETHINKING MIGUEL FISAC BONES SYSTEM
A project by: Will Choi - MArch - Matías Imbern - MDesS - Felix Raspall DDes
GSD 6423 (Re)fabricating Tectonic Prototypes . Instructor: Leire Asensio
INTRODUCTION: MIGUEL FISAC
Biography
Born in Daimiel (Ciudad Real) in 1913. He obtained his degree at the School of Architecture of Madrid in 1942. His first work was completed that same year: the Holy Spirit Church, built upon the remains of the auditorium of the Student Residence in Madrid. During a trip to Sweden he would discover the works of Gunnar Asplund, which would influence his concept on architecture. Always working with newer materials, his style evolved over time: from abstract classicism he moves toward a greater use of brick, which he would later abandon for concrete, especially pre-stressed concrete, his patented invention. Some of his most emblematic works are from this last period, like the Hydrographical Study Centre or the Jorba Laborato-ries. He died in Madrid in 2006.
Awards
Gold Medal for Spanish Architecture (1994)Antonio Camuñas Award (1997)National Architecture Award (2002)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. BACKGROUND 1.1 Design Concept 1.2 Geometric Definition and Structural Behavior 1.3 Fabrication and Assembly 1.4 Scaled Prototype Production 1.5 Case Studies 1.6 Conclusions
2. THESIS STATEMENT 2.1 Genealogy
3. PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT 3.1 Interpolation Module 3.2 Beam 3.3 Girders 3.4 Vertical Supports
4. PROLIFERATION 4.1 Quads 4.2 Fields
5. FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY TECHNIQUE 5.1 Robotic Tool: Foam Hot Wire Cutter 5.2 Cutting Sequence
6. FABRICATED MODELS 6.1 Cast Piece 6.2 Foam Pieces
7. PROPOSAL 7.1 Optional Models 7.2 Final Prototype 7.3 Full Scale Model 7.4 Analysis
8. OUTLOOK 8.1 Design Speculations
1. BACKGROUND
2. THESIS STATEMENT
3. SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
4. PROLIFERATION
5. FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY TECHNIQUE
6. FABRICATED MODELS
7. PROTOTYPE
8. OUTLOOK
1.1 DESIGN CONCEPT
“The pieces that I have obtained using this architectonic-static means have resulted in sections with forms very like the
bones of vertebrates. It’s not that I wanted to make them like bones, it’s just that they turned out that way. That makes you
think that, naturally, some parallel exists. You could interpret it as proof that this is the right path, it corresponds to concepts
which we see in nature. My collaborators, in many cases, have called these pieces bones, in a pejorative sense, because set-
ting up their production entails numerous difficulties. But without doubt, it could be a way”.
“Hormigón y Acero” Magazine nº 79, pág. 36 a 39. 1966.
MAIN GOALS OF THE SYSTEM:
STRUCTURAL EFFICIENCY + SUN LIGHTING + WATER DRAIN
EXPERIMENTATION:
12 PIECES DESIGNED - 9 USED IN FORMED BUILDINGS
-Hollow Core-Thin Concrete Walls-High Inertia-Strong Deformation Resistance
1.2 GEOMETRIC DEFINITION AND STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOR ::: SECTIONS OF THE ‘BONES’
Cedex Piece Sigma Piece Trapecio Piece Cerro del Aire Piece
Dimensions in cm.
1.2 GEOMETRIC DEFINITION AND STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOR ::: CEDEX PIECE
fabrication period1960-1963
employmentCover
maximum span22m
class of reinforcementTwisted Cable
weight of the piece [kg/ml]350
commentsThe calculation of the section was made without the superior parasol, as is shown in the schema section (and yet the dowel properties corre-spond to the totallity of the section) the parabolic trajectories of the cables correspond to the sets of two and three drills while the remainder are straight (of late is has been replaced by a prestressed replica).
VON MISES STRESS ANALYSIS - FEA
SECTION AT SUPPORT
AXONOMETRIC
22m. SPAN
Fixed supports at beam endsSelf-weight
1.2 GEOMETRIC DEFINITION AND STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOR ::: SIGMA PIECE
fabrication period1967-1971
employmentCover
maximum span17m
class of reinforcementBraided Cable / Wires
weight of the piece [kg/ml]107
commentsthere is a non-constructed version that makes it possible to illuminate the inner part. In forgings, the light varies between 16 and 20 m. Even reaching up to 25 on cover dependending on the calculation overloads. In the upper board the piece has some cross-linked shaped rivets that improve the adherence between the piece and the compression layer.t
VON MISES STRESS ANALYSIS - FEAFixed supports at beam endsSelf-weight
SECTION AT SUPPORT
AXONOMETRIC
17m. SPAN
1.2 GEOMETRIC DEFINITION AND STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOR ::: TRAPECIO PIECE
fabrication period1968-1971
employmentForging / Cover
maximum span16-20m / 25m
class of reinforcementBraided cable / Wire
weight of the piece [kg/ml]180
commentsthere is a non-constructed version that makes it possible to illuminate the inner part. In forg-ings, the light varies between 16 and 20 m. Even reaching up to 25 on cover depending on the calculation overloads. In the upper board the piece has some cross-linked shaped rivets that improve the adherence between the piece and the compression layer.
VON MISES STRESS ANALYSIS - FEAFixed supports at beam endsSelf-weight
SECTION AT SUPPORT
AXONOMETRIC
25m. SPAN
fabrication period1970
employmentCover
maximum span7-10-14m
class of reinforcementSingle line wire
weight of the piece [kg/ml]180
commentsThis is a piece that was patented as pre-stressed and built as post-tensioned, which ex-plains some of its peculiarities. It has a double dowel (2 meters long) and a system of single line post-tensioning of the freyssinet class. The problems of the resting of the pieces over the girder are solved like in the prestressed pieces. The post-tensioning wedges aren’t on sight, rather being hidden with mortar.
1.2 GEOMETRIC DEFINITION AND STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOR ::: CERRO DEL AIRE PIECE
VON MISES STRESS ANALYSIS - FEAFixed supports at beam endsSelf-weight
SECTION AT SUPPORT
AXONOMETRIC
14m. SPAN
1.2 GEOMETRIC DEFINITION AND STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOR ::: CEDEX PIECE DETAILS
STRUCTURE FAMILY 2
POST-TENSION SYSTEM - 22M. SPAN
LOADS BEHAVIOR
STRUCTURE FAMILY 1
© González Blanco, Fermín “Miguel Fisac: Huesos Varios”. Madrid : Fundación COAM, 2007.
1.3 FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY ::: PRECAST CONCRETE
-Vicente Peiro System-Metalic Formwork
© González Blanco, Fermín “Miguel Fisac: Huesos Varios”. Madrid : Fundación COAM, 2007.
1.3 FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY ::: 2 STRATEGIES
-Voussoir’s crane, multiple components assembled one by one (scaffolding is used)-Pre-assembly creating a single beam component (no scaffolding)
© González Blanco, Fermín “Miguel Fisac: Huesos Varios”. Madrid : Fundación COAM, 2007.
1.3 FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY ::: POST-TENSION
-Ricardo Barredo System-The anchorages are exposed
© González Blanco, Fermín “Miguel Fisac: Huesos Varios”. Madrid : Fundación COAM, 2007.
1.3 FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY ::: SUPPORTS
-Special pieces of the system-Transfer the load from the horizontal beam to the vertical plane
© González Blanco, Fermín “Miguel Fisac: Huesos Varios”. Madrid : Fundación COAM, 2007.
1.4 SCALED PROTOTYPE PRODUCTION ::: CEDEX PIECE
-CNC Milling: Blue Foam 3in. Mold-Rockite Cement
1.5 CASE STUDIES ::: HIDROGRAPHICAL CEDEX CENTER - MADRID, 1960
-Uniform Interior Lighting-Modular (voussoir) Structure
© González Blanco, Fermín “Miguel Fisac: Huesos Varios”. Madrid : Fundación COAM, 2007.
1.5 CASE STUDIES ::: BARREDO HOUSE - MADRID, 1963
-Variable section
© González Blanco, Fermín “Miguel Fisac: Huesos Varios”. Madrid : Fundación COAM, 2007.
1.5 CASE STUDIES ::: TEJADA HOUSE - MADRID, 1967
-Variable plan
© González Blanco, Fermín “Miguel Fisac: Huesos Varios”. Madrid : Fundación COAM, 2007.
ADVANTAGES:
-Structurally efficient: Lightness (hollow pieces) / Long spans.
-Post-tensioned concrete avoid cracks, making it waterproof.
-Hollow pieces act as natural insulation.
-Complex interior forms improve acoustic problems of concrete.
DISADVANTAGES:
-The joints between the acrylic and the concrete, and between the different modules are difficult to seal.
- Water that has penetrated the interior of the modules is really difficult to remove.
-The thermal insulation is not enough for current standards.
LIMITATIONS:
-No flexibility for different light condition requirements. Under Fisac’s system all the interior space has the same an homoge-
neous natural illumination, making the system difficult to accommodate different programmatic functions.
-The system is also too rigid to adapt it to geometries that are not orthogonal. This condition also creates difficulty in using
the system with diverse programmatic functions.
-The maximum size of the voussoirs was driven by the technology at that time, related with the machinery and the concrete
performance.
1.6 CONCLUSIONS
1. BACKGROUND
2. THESIS STATEMENT
3. SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
4. PROLIFERATION
5. FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY TECHNIQUE
6. FABRICATED MODELS
7. PROTOTYPE
8. OUTLOOK
FISAC‘S GOALS OF THE BONES SYSTEM:
STRUCTURAL EFFICIENCY + SUN LIGHTING + WATER DRAIN
NEW FEATURES USING DIGITAL TOOLS:
FLEXIBILITY + ADAPTABILITY
We propose to expand Miguel Fisac’s Huesos System by using digital design and fabrication tools. The main goal is to develop a mass-customizable system that can deal with wider and more complex range of structural, programmatic and organiza-tional requirements.
FLEXIBILITY: In contemporary architecture where mixed-use buildings are gaining more importance as a way of dealing with programmatic complexity, the system should be able to create different natural light conditions in order to expand the range of functions that can coexist under it.
ADAPTABILITY: The system also needs to be able to adapt itself to complex geometry without losing its structural efficiency. This condition will also increase its applicability.
These new features have the objective of extending the range of possible uses of the system as a way of deal-ing with the problems that caused the obsolescence of the original system.
OPPORTUNITIES:
1. DIGITAL DESIGN: Parametric Models2. FABRICATION TOOL: Robotic Formwork [Hot Wire Cutter]: Ruled Surfaces3. MATERIAL: High-Tension and Self-Compacting Concrete Mixtures.
2.1 GENEALOGY
The Huesos Family was systematized by creating a para-metric 6-point system that can reproduce several pieces. This system allows for gradual variation between pieces and specific control of its performance.
6 CONTROL POINTS SYSTEM
WALL THICKNESSAND FILLET RADIUS
COORDINATES OF THE SIX MAIN POINTS AND BENDING CONTROL
2.1 GENEALOGY ::: ASSOCIATIVE MODEL
FINAL SECTION
CEDEX
SIGMA
SIGMA
CERRO DEL AIRE
CERRO DEL AIRE TRAPECIO
FISAC ORIGINAL SYSTEM FISAC VARIATION 01
1. Basic Hueso Piece
2. Linear Array (Beam)
3. Linear Array (Surface)
4. Linear Support
1. Basic Hueso Piece
2. 2D Array (Beam)
3. Linear Array (Beam)
4. Point Support
FISAC ORIGINAL SYSTEM FISAC VARIATION 01
1. Basic Hueso Piece
2. Linear Array (Beam)
3. Linear Array (Surface)
4. Linear Support
1. Basic Hueso Piece
2. 2D Array (Beam)
3. Linear Array (Beam)
4. Point Support
2.1 GENEALOGY ::: TOPOLOGICAL VARIATION
-Connections in two directions-Suppression of linear supports
FISAC ORIGINAL SYSTEM FISAC VARIATION 01
1. Basic Hueso Piece
2. Linear Array (Beam)
3. Linear Array (Surface)
4. Linear Support
1. Basic Hueso Piece
2. 2D Array (Beam)
3. Linear Array (Beam)
4. Point Support
FISAC ORIGINAL SYSTEM FISAC VARIATION 01
1. Basic Hueso Piece
2. Linear Array (Beam)
3. Linear Array (Surface)
4. Linear Support
1. Basic Hueso Piece
2. 2D Array (Beam)
3. Linear Array (Beam)
4. Point Support
FISAC ORIGINAL SYSTEM FISAC VARIATION 01
1. Basic Hueso Piece
2. Linear Array (Beam)
3. Linear Array (Surface)
4. Linear Support
1. Basic Hueso Piece
2. 2D Array (Beam)
3. Linear Array (Beam)
4. Point Support
FISAC ORIGINAL SYSTEM FISAC VARIATION 01
1. Basic Hueso Piece
2. Linear Array (Beam)
3. Linear Array (Surface)
4. Linear Support
1. Basic Hueso Piece
2. 2D Array (Beam)
3. Linear Array (Beam)
4. Point Support
FISAC ORIGINAL SYSTEM FISAC VARIATION 01
1. Basic Hueso Piece
2. Linear Array (Beam)
3. Linear Array (Surface)
4. Linear Support
1. Basic Hueso Piece
2. 2D Array (Beam)
3. Linear Array (Beam)
4. Point Support
FISAC ORIGINAL SYSTEM FISAC VARIATION 01
1. Basic Hueso Piece
2. Linear Array (Beam)
3. Linear Array (Surface)
4. Linear Support
1. Basic Hueso Piece
2. 2D Array (Beam)
3. Linear Array (Beam)
4. Point Support
FISA
C O
RIG
INA
L SY
STEM
FISA
C VA
RIAT
ION
01
FISA
C VA
RIAT
ION
01
FISA
C VA
RIAT
ION
01
FISA
C O
RIG
INA
L SY
STEM
FISA
C VA
RIAT
ION
01
FISA
C VA
RIAT
ION
01
FISA
C VA
RIAT
ION
01
FISA
C O
RIG
INA
L SY
STEM
FISA
C VA
RIAT
ION
01
FISA
C VA
RIAT
ION
01
FISA
C VA
RIAT
ION
01
FISA
C O
RIG
INA
L SY
STEM
FISA
C VA
RIAT
ION
01
FISA
C VA
RIAT
ION
01
FISA
C VA
RIAT
ION
01
FISAC ORIGINAL SYSTEM FISAC VARIATION
ASSEMBLY SEQUENCE ASSEMBLY SEQUENCE
1. BACKGROUND
2. THESIS STATEMENT
3. SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
4. PROLIFERATION
5. FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY TECHNIQUE
6. FABRICATED MODELS
7. PROTOTYPE
8. OUTLOOK
3.1 INTERPOLATION MODULE
NORMATIVEDEVIATION DEVIATIONOPERATION EFFECT CALIBRATION
Extension
Tilting
Deepening
Fattening
Widening
Modulation ofdirect light
Modulation ofindirect light
Increasedstiffness
Increasedstiffness
Voluminouspresence
1.00 - 2.00
-54 - 54
.65 - 2.10
.05 - .25
0.00 - 1,60
NEW FISAC PIECE
1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
0.65
1.00
1.35
1.75
2.10
0.50 0.85
1.25 1.60
0.250.200.150.100.05
54°
28° 28°
54°
0.00
0°
GENEALOGY FISAC
Section 01Connects to Fis
ac Piece
Connects to Fisac Piece
Section 02
INTERPOLATION MODULE
3.2 BEAMS
NORMATIVEDEVIATION DEVIATIONOPERATION EFFECT CALIBRATION
ConstantDeepening
ElevationCurvature
PlanSkewing
Span
IncreasedStiffness
Adaptability
Adaptability
IncreasedSpace
1.00 - 2.10
0° - 40°
1 - 2
6.00 - 30.00
BEAM
VariableDeepening
MaterialOptimization
0.70 - 2.10
Cantilever Extended Space
1.50 - 9.00
30.006.00
30°
1.50
30°
24.00
1.50 6.00 9.00
1.00
1.50
2.10
1.50
1.00
1.30
3.00
1.50
1.50
1.00 2.00
1.50
VAULTBEAM 0°
6.00
EXAMPLE BEAM
BEAM ARCHING
SECTION DEFORMATION ALONG SPAN
CONNECTIONTO GIRDER
3.3 GIRDERS ::: SINGLE GIRDER
NORMATIVEDEVIATION DEVIATIONOPERATION EFFECT CALIBRATION
ConstantDeepening
ElevationCurvature
PlanCurvature
Span
IncreasedStiffness
Adaptability
Adaptability
IncreasedSpace
1.00 - 2.10
0° - 40°
0% - 10%
12.00 - 39.00
GIRDER
VariableDeepening
MaterialOptimization
0.70 - 2.10
Cantilever Extended Space
3.00 - 12,00
1.50
30°
1.50
30.00 39.0012.00
2.10
1.00
1.30
1.00
30°
3.00
1.00
1.50
ARCHBEAM 0°
0%
6.00 3.00 9.0012.00
GENEALOGY GIRDER
Connects to Fisac Piece
Connects to Girder Piece
Connects to Girder Piece
Connects to Fisac Piece
Section 01
Section 03
Section 02
Section 04
GIRDER PIECE
3.3 GIRDERS ::: DOUBLE GIRDER
NORMATIVEDEVIATION DEVIATIONOPERATION EFFECT CALIBRATION
Plan Branching
SectionAperture
Plan Aperture
StructuralBifurcation
Skylight
0 - 2
0° - 40°
0% - 20%
DOBLE GIRDER
PlanCurvature
Increasedstiffness
0% - 10%
3.00
30.00
6.00
10% 20%
1.00 3.3%
1.00
1 branch 2 branches0 branch3.3%
0%3.3%
3.0010%
34°
30° 14°
0°
NORMATIVEDEVIATION DEVIATIONOPERATION EFFECT CALIBRATION
Extension
Widening
Rotation
Elevation
Quads Delimitation
Increased Stability
Quads Vinculation
Clearance
6.00 - 15.00
1.50 - 6.00
4.00 - 7.00
2.00 - 4,00
BONE PYRAMID
3.00
2.00
4.00
12.006.00 15.00
1.50
3.00 5.00
3.75
3.75
10.0
0
4.00
3.00
3.4 VERTICAL SUPPORT ::: TETRAPOD
VARIATIONS: BASE DIMENSIONS. HEIGHT, PERFORATIONS’ SHAPE
3.4 VERTICAL SUPPORT ::: COLUMNS
NORMATIVEDEVIATION DEVIATIONOPERATION EFFECT CALIBRATION
Widening
Skewing
Branching
Extend
OpenedBranches
MaterialEfficiency /
Disequilibrium
Doble Girder Support
IncreasedClearance
0.40 - 1.00
0° - 40°
-
3.00 - 6.00
BONE COLUMN
Fattening IncreasedStiffness
0.70 - 2.10
Transition IncreasedBranches
20% - 66%
4.50 6.
00
3.00
2.00 3.
001.00
1.501.00 2.00
0.400.25 1.00
0.40
1.000.35 0.40
0.400.65
DIFFERENT HEIGHT SAME HEIGHT DIFFERENT HEIGHT
VARIATIONS: BASE GEOMETRY, TRANSITION GEOMETRY, BRANCHES GEOMETRY
3.4 VERTICAL SUPPORT ::: LANDSCAPE
OPERATION EFFECT CALIBRATION
Bump
Ramp
Plane
Clearance
Smooth Transition
-
1.00 - 3.00
5.00 - 15.00
-
LANDSCAPE CONDITION
30.00
3.00
5.00
9.00 15.003.00
2.00
5.00
16.50 7.503.00
2.00
30°
6.00
3.00
3.00 21.00 3.00
30° 4.00
1.003.00 21.00 3.00
BIRDSEYE VIEW
INTERIOR VIEW
1. BACKGROUND
2. THESIS STATEMENT
3. SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
4. PROLIFERATION
5. FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY TECHNIQUE
6. FABRICATED MODELS
7. PROTOTYPE
8. OUTLOOK
4.1 QUADS
NORMATIVE DEVIATIONOPERATION EFFECT CALIBRATION
ArchingY
ArchingXY
Thinning
Deforming
ArchingX
Longer Span
Longer Span
Decreasedmaterial use
PlanVariation
Longer Span
0 - 10.0
0 - 14.50 - 10.0
_
_
0 - 14.5
QUAD
4.1 QUADS ::: ASSOCIATIVE MODEL
INPUT GEOMETRY PARAMETERS
ATTRACTOR DISTANCE CALCULATION
BEAM SECTION GENERATION
BEAM SECTION GENERATION
GIRDER SECTION GENERATION
TRANSVERSE GIRDER SECTION GENERATION
FINAL SECTIONS
4.1 QUADS ::: FLAT
QUAD
VARIATIONSNONE
VARIATIONSBEAM BOTTOM WIDTH
VARIATIONSBEAM BOTTOM WIDTH
FLANGE EXTENSION
CATENARY ARCH
SMALL APERTURES
APERTURES ENLARGEMENT
WIDER APERTURES
4.1 QUADS ::: CATENARY ARCH
QUAD
VARIATIONSNONE
VARIATIONSBEAM BOTTOM WIDTH
VARIATIONSBEAM BOTTOM WIDTH
FLANGE EXTENSION
CATENARY ARCH
4.1 QUADS ::: CATENARY DOME
QUAD
VARIATIONSBEAM BOTTOM WIDTH
VARIATIONSBEAM BOTTOM WIDTH
FLANGE EXTENSION
VARIATIONSBEAM BOTTOM WIDTH
FLANGE EXTENSIONFLANGE ROTATION
CATENARY DOME
4.1 QUADS ::: HYPERBOLIC PARABOLOID
QUAD
VARIATIONSFLANGE EXTENSION
FLANGE ANGLE
VARIATIONSFLANGE EXTENSION
VARIATIONSFLANGE EXTENSION
FLANGE ANGLE
HYPERBOLIC PARABOLOID
SINGLE QUAD FIELD
PROPAGATING WARPING SLITTING
TWISTING COILING STACKING
4.2 FIELDS ::: VARIATIONS
WARPINGPROPAGATING
SLITTING TWISTING
4.2 FIELDS ::: VARIATIONS
COILING STACKING
1. BACKGROUND
2. THESIS STATEMENT
3. SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
4. PROLIFERATION
5. FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY TECHNIQUE
6. FABRICATED MODELS
7. PROTOTYPE
8. OUTLOOK
5.1 ROBOTIC TOOL. FOAM HOT WIRE CUTTER ::: DESIGN
5.1 ROBOTIC TOOL. FOAM HOT WIRE CUTTER ::: FABRICATION
5.2 CUTTING SEQUENCE ::: ASSOCIATIVE MODEL
BOUNDING BOX (STOCK) CALCULATION
CURVES DISCRETIZATION
ALIGNMENT, CORE HOLE AND LATERAL KEYS GEOMETRY
INTERPOLATION PIECE SECTIONS INPUT GIRDER PIECE SECTION INPUT
SIMULATION AND RAPID CODE GENERATION
GIRDER PIECE SECTION INPUT
5.2 CUTTING SEQUENCE
1 - BOTTOM 2 - TOP 4 - LATERALS /KEYS3 - INTERIOR
FINAL PIECE
1. BACKGROUND
2. THESIS STATEMENT
3. SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
4. PROLIFERATION
5. FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY TECHNIQUE
6. FABRICATED MODELS
7. PROTOTYPE
6.1 CAST PIECE ::: ROCKITE
6.2 FOAM PIECES
1. BACKGROUND
2. THESIS STATEMENT
3. SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
4. PROLIFERATION
5. FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY TECHNIQUE
6. FABRICATED MODELS
7. PROTOTYPE
8. OUTLOOK
7.1 OPTIONAL MODELS ::: VAULT
7.1 OPTIONAL MODELS ::: DOME
7.1 OPTIONAL MODELS ::: HYPERBOLIC PARABOLOID
7.2 FINAL PROTOTYPE ::: 14x8 = 112 PIECES
3
1,5 0
,8
Dimensions in meters
7.2 FINAL PROTOTYPE ::: EXHIBITION
7.2 FINAL PROTOTYPE ::: EXHIBITION
7.2 FINAL PROTOTYPE ::: EXHIBITION
7.3 FULL SCALE MODEL ::: 30x10 = 300 PIECES
36
18
9,6
2,8
Dimensions in meters
7.4 ANALYSIS ::: STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOR
SUPPORT
GIRDER POST-TENSION
BEAM POST-TENSION
7.4 ANALYSIS ::: LIGHT CONTROL
INDIRECT LIGHT DIRECT LIGHT
7.4 ANALYSIS ::: WATER DRAIN
LATERAL DRAIN
CENTRAL DRAIN
1. BACKGROUND
2. THESIS STATEMENT
3. SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
4. PROLIFERATION
5. FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY TECHNIQUE
6. FABRICATED MODELS
7. PROTOTYPE
8. OUTLOOK
8.1 DESIGN SPECULATIONS ::: HOUSE
DOMESTIC SCALE AIRPORT SCALE
8.1 DESIGN SPECULATIONS ::: CANOPY
DOMESTIC SCALE AIRPORT SCALE
8.1 DESIGN SPECULATIONS ::: SHOPPING CENTER
DOMESTIC SCALE AIRPORT SCALE
8.1 DESIGN SPECULATIONS ::: AIRPORT
DOMESTIC SCALE AIRPORT SCALE