Fire severity and succession: spatial and temporal patterns and implications for herbivores

Post on 24-Jan-2016

36 views 0 download

Tags:

description

Fire severity and succession: spatial and temporal patterns and implications for herbivores. Fire severity. Patterns of vegetation dominance in the second decade of succession. Implications for herbivores. Post-fire residual organic layer depth as a metric of fire severity. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Fire severity and succession: spatial and temporal patterns and implications for herbivores

Fire severity and succession: spatial and temporal patterns and

implications for herbivores

Fire severity Implications for herbivores

Patterns of vegetation dominance in the second

decade of succession

Carbon loss Permafrost thaw

Post-fire soil moisture and temperature

Resprouting potential / seed availabilityPost-fire seedling recruitment and establishment

Post-fire residual organic layer depth as a metric of fire severity

Shallow organic layer = high severityDeep organic layer = low severity

Mature black spruce

Low severity

burn

High severityburn

Time

Time

Seedling recruitmentand establishment phase

(Johnstone and Kasischke 2005)

Black spruce self replacement

Persistent deciduous canopy presence?

STUDY SITES 1987 Granite Creek Burn- GC87 1994 Hajdukovich Creek Burn- HC94 1999 Donnelly Flats burn- DF99

1990 Tok burn – TK90

OL depth >8cm

Study sites in 1994 Hajdukovich Creek burn

OL depth 4-8 cm

OL depth 0-4 cm

Aspen

Stem density decreased by 60 %

Biomass per unit area increased ~2 fold

Average individual biomass increased ~ 3 fold

Changes in stand density and biomassfrom 8 yrs to 14 yrs post-fire

Stem density was unchanged

Biomass per unit area increased 40 fold

Average individual biomass increased ~ 30 fold

Spruce

Fire severity effects on species recruitment and establishment patterns are persistent

Shenoy et al. 2011, FEM 261, pp 381-90

Fire severity- species composition relationships across multiple burns

Divergent successional trajectories are developing at two ends of the fire severity spectrum

Shenoy et al .2011

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140 high sever-itylow severity

Ave

rag

e b

asa

l are

a

incr

em

en

t (m

m2

)

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

high severitylow severity

Ave

rag

e b

asa

l are

a

incr

em

en

t (m

m2

)Black spruce

Aspen

Growth rates of black spruce and aspen in low versus high severity sites (HC94 burn)

Series10

10

20

30

40

50

60 0-4cm

4-8cm

>8cm

Biom

ass

(g m

-2)B

Organic layer depth

Willow biomass

OL depth < 1 cm

Low severity High severity

OL depth ~14 cm

Persistent shift in forest composition

Rachel Lord thesis 2008

Forage availability in HC94 burn

Density of forage species(aspen, willow, birch)

Browse production

Browse removal per ha (x6)

In high severity sites:

Browsing pressure was high throughout HC94 burn

Adapted from Paragi and Kellie 2008 ADFG

Browse production and removal in HC94 burn

Kalin Kellie (ADFG) personal communication

High moose densities in the HC94 burn

Densest moose populations (within GMU 20D) in areas that burned 11-30 years ago Maier et al. 2005, CJFR Vol.35 pp2233-2243

Implications of variation in fire severity for herbivores

FIRE

Fire severity Deciduous: coniferousbiomass

Forage availability

Nutrition Moose populationdensity

Site architecture Forage accessibility

Hunter success

Growth rates of aspen and spruce

Thank you!Knut KiellandJill JohnstoneEric KasischkeRoger Ruess

Field work:Kirsten BarrettMatt BorrCameron CarrollBen CookCassidy PhillipsAdrian Rocha

Thank you!