Finding Functional Gene Relationships Using the Semantic Gene Organizer (SGO) Kevin Heinrich...

Post on 04-Jan-2016

216 views 0 download

Transcript of Finding Functional Gene Relationships Using the Semantic Gene Organizer (SGO) Kevin Heinrich...

Finding Functional Gene Relationships Using the Semantic

Gene Organizer (SGO)

Kevin Heinrich

Master’s Defense

July 16, 2004

Outline

• Problem / Goals

• Related Work

• Information Retrieval– Vector Space Model– Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI)

• Biological Databases

• SGO Use & Results

Problem

• Biological tools are creating vast amounts of data.

• Current techniques are time-consuming and expensive.

• Want to know phenotype (function) from genotype (structure/sequence).

Goals

• Develop a tool to aid researchers in finding and understanding functional gene relationships.

• Use information that covers whole genome, e.g. literature.

Related Work

• Jenssen et al. (2001) developed PubGene.– Literature network– Assigns functional association if there is a co-

occurrence of gene symbols

• Wilkinson and Huberman (2004) expanded this idea to find communities of related genes.

• Yandell and Majoros (2002) use natural language processing techniques to identify nature of relationships.

Related Work

• Most all literature-based techniques rely on term co-occurrence.

• What about gene aliases?

• Solution: Apply a more robust technique.

Information RetrievalVector Space Model

• Documents are parsed into tokens.

• Tokens are assigned a weight of, wij, of ith token in jth document.

• An m x n term-by-document matrix, A, is created where

– Documents are m-dimensional vectors.– Tokens are n-dimensional vectors.

ijwA

Information RetrievalTerm Weights

• Term weights are the product of a local and global component

• tf

• idf

• idf2

jiijij dglw

ijij fl

jij

jij

i f

f

g

1log2 j

iji f

ng

Information RetrievalTerm Weights (cont’d)

• log-entropy

• Goal is to give distinguishing terms more weight.

n

pp

g jijij

i2

2

log

log

1

ijij fl 1log

jij

ijij f

fp

Information RetrievalQuery & Similarity

• Queries are represented by a pseudo-document vector

• Similarity is the cosine of the angle between document vectors.

mgggq ,,, 210

m

kk

m

kkj

m

kkjk

j

jjj

gw

wg

dq

dqdqsim

1

2

1

2

1cos,

Information RetrievalLatent Semantic Indexing (LSI)

LSI performs a truncated SVD on

A = UΣVT

• U is the m x n matrix of eigenvectors of AAT

• VT is the r x n matrix of eigenvectors of ATA• Σ is the r x r diagonal matrix containing the r nonnegative

singular values of A• r is the rank of A

A rank-k approximation is given by Ak = UkΣkVkT

Information RetrievalLSI (cont’d)

• Document-to-document similarity is

• Queries are projected into low-rank approximation space

TkkkkTk VVAA

10

kkTUqq

Information RetrievalLSI (cont’d)

• Scaled document vectors can be computed once and stored for quick retrieval.

• The lower-dimensional space forces queries and documents to be compared in a more conceptual manner and saves storage.

• Choice of number of factors is an open question.

• End Effect: LSI can find similarities between documents that have no term co-occurrence.

Information RetrievalEvaluation Measures

• Precision – ratio of relevant returned documents to the total number of returned documents.

• Recall – ratio of relevant returned documents to the total number of relevant documents.

• Goal is to have high precision at all levels of recall.

• Systems are often evaluated by average precision (AP), which is the average of 11 interpolated precision values at the decile ranges.

Biological DatabasesMEDLINE

• MEDLINE (NLM)– Contains 14+ million references to journal

articles with a concentration in medicine– Span over 4,600 journals worldwide– 1966 to present– ~500,000 citations added annually– Each citation is manually indexed with MeSH

terms.

Biological DatabasesPubMed

• PubMed– Retrieves articles from MEDLINE and other

journals.– Can be queried via any combination of

attributes.

Biological DatabasesLocusLink

• NCBI human-curated database• Single query interface to a comprehensive

directory for genes and gene reference sequences for key genomes.

• Provides links to related records in PubMed and other citations when applicable.

• Provides RefSeq Summary of gene function and links to key MEDLINE citations relevant to each gene.

Biological DatabasesOverview

• MEDLINE has lots information– Not all articles relate to genes– Gene terminology problem

• LocusLink does not cover all relevant citations, but a representative few.

Biological DatabasesGene Document Construction

• Concatenate titles and abstracts of MEDLINE citations cross-referenced in Human, Rat, and Mouse LocusLink entries.

• Sequencing abstracts included – noise

• LocusLink references are not comprehensive, so recall of all relevant abstracts is not guaranteed.

SGO

• Primarily uses LSI to rank genes.

• Enables user to specify query method– Gene query– Keyword query– Number of factors– Show latent matches

• Saves previous query sessions.

SGOInterface

SGOInterface (cont’d)

SGOTrees

• Unfortunately, ranked lists mean little to biologists.

• Pairwise distances can be formed into a matrix

where is the similarity between documents i and j

ijdD

ijijd cos1

ijcos

SGOTrees (cont’d)

• Fitch-Margoliash (1967) method in PHYLIP is applied to D to generate hierarchical trees.

• Thresholds can be applied to self-similarity matrix to produce graphs.

SGOHierarchical Tree

SGOGraph or Nodal Tree

SGOCoding Issues

• Web interface – must be interactive– Queries are processed on click– Document collections are parsed offline– Trees are constructed offline

• Storage will eventually become an issue.

ResultsTest Data Set

• 50 gene test data set was constructed.– Alzheimer’s Disease– Cancer– Development

• Reelin signaling pathway used as basis for evaluation– 5 primary genes (directly

associated)– 7 secondary genes (indirectly

associated)

ResultsPrimary AP

• AP for 5 primary genes– 61% for 5 factors– 84% for 25 factors– 84% for 50 factors

ResultsSecondary AP

• AP for 12 secondary genes– 53% for 5 factors– 59% for 25 factors– 61% for 50 factors

ResultsComparison

• LSI comparable to tf-idf for 5 primary genes• Far superior to tf-idf for 12 second genes

– PubMed co-citation identifies 2 of the 7 indirectly related genes

– Abstract overlap of LocusLink citations fails to identify any indirectly related genes

• tf-idf fails on many keyword queries

• Tested on Gene Ontology classifications (not shown)– Similar tendencies are observed

ResultsAbstract Representation

• To simulate scaling up, decrease representation of reelin-related genes

• AP of 47% on 20,856 Human LocusLink abstracts

ResultsHierarchical Tree

ResultsHierarchical Tree

ResultsHierarchical Tree

Conclusions

• SGO allows genes to be compared to each other and to keyword (function).

• SGO identifies latent relationships with promising accuracy.

• SGO is not meant to replace existing technologies, but to assist researchers– Verify current results– Direct future exploration

Future Work

• Scale up to entire genome

• Document construction

• Incorporate structural or other information for multi-modal similarity

• Test other models e.g. NMF, QR, etc.

• Interactive tree building

• Keep collections current