Post on 14-Jul-2020
National Capitol Region HAZUS User Group Call June 20, 2013 10:00 AM EST
Listen to the recording here to follow along with the presentation: http://www.freeconferencecalling.com/Recordings/Recording.aspx?fileid=LAF3494_06202013070618500_1154430&bridge=697620&email=&accountid=1116753
NCR HUG Call Details Conference Call Details: 1. Dial-in: 1-267-507-0240 2. Conference code: 697620
Join the Meeting through Adobe Connect: (No Registration Required) Click here to access the Adobe Connect meeting The call will be recorded and the audio will be combined with the presentation and sent out at the end of the call. The audio and presentation will also be made available on the following websites: NCR HUG Use HAZUS page - http://www.usehazus.com/ncrhug NCR HUG LinkedIn page - http://www.linkedin.com/groups/National-Capitol-Region-HAZUS-User-4790251?trk=myg_ugrp_ovr
2
Agenda • Welcome + Announcements
• Jenna McGee – HAZUS Presentation
HAZUS Pilot Study in Autauga County, Alabama
• James Mawby– HAZUS “How to” Presentation An attempt to add 2011 FEMA Benefit Cost Analysis Reengineering (BCAR) curves in HAZUS – Updates to depth damage functions
• Reminder: HAZUS Data & Training Collaboration
• Request for Volunteers – Next NCR HUG Call
• Adjourn
3
Announcements
Upcoming HAZUS Courses at EMI The Emergency Management Institute (EMI) has two HAZUS training courses available in next month: E313 Basic HAZUS-MH: July 22-25 2013 E317 Comprehensive Data Management for HAZUS-MH: August 12-15 2013 Courses offered offsite: L313 Basic HAZUS-MH: July 8-11 2013 in Durham, NH
July 15-17 2013 in Loma Linda, CA
July 15-17 2013 in Indianapolis, IN
July 29 – August 1 2013 in Cranston, RI
To apply for a Hazus training course, please visit: http://training.fema.gov/Apply/
To enroll, download the Admission Application or contact Philip Moore at (301) 447-1248 For further information on registration, please visit training.fema.gov/emiweb
4
Announcements Continued
2013 HAZUS Symposium: Indianapolis, IN FREE Registration is now open! Please visit http://hazusconference2013.eventbrite.com/ to register and learn more about the Hazus Conference.
Participants are encouraged to submit presentation abstracts between 75 and 150 words in length. Submissions should also include the presenters complete contact information and a brief biography. All submissions should be emailed to Dave Coats at decoats@iupui.edu and must be received no later than June 25, 2013.
Preliminary Agenda:
Workshop - Introduction to HAZUS and its use : Kevin Mickey, Polis Institute Director of Geospatial Technologies Education Presentations: Eric Berman as well as multiple HAZUS experts who will showcase HAZUS best practices HAZUS Awards Ceremony HAZUS Success Stories Please contact hazus@arcaspicio.com if you would like to submit your own “Success Story” and discuss your use of HAZUS at the conference
5
Hazus Pilot StudyFlood, Hurricane, Earthquake*
*This presentation will focus on Earthquake Hazard Map updates.
Project ScopeAnalysis utilizing building specific data◦ Building footprint locations◦ Attributes: Occupancy, cost, stories, year
built, design type, etc. Hazard Data◦ Flood: engineered depth grids◦ Hurricane: no updates◦ Earthquake: updated hazard maps
BUILDING FOOTPRINTSwith parcel based attributes
Building Analysis Locations
Common DifficultiesIn most cases building footprint data cannot be used without some manual editing.
FLOOD STUDY
Flood Depth GridsMulti-profile depth grids based on updated engineered models.
Example 1: Multi-Profile Results
$ values shown are thousands of dollars
Example 2: 100-Year Results
$ values shown are thousands of dollars
AAL ResultsAggregated building specific losses to Census BlocksCompared to FEMA 2010 National AAL Level 1 Study
HURRICANE STUDY
Storm Tracks7 Probabilistic events: 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500 and 1000
Updated GBS – AAL Results
UDF – 500yr Results
EARTHQUAKE STUDY
Hazard MapsNEHRP (National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program) Soil Classification◦ USGS EQ Hazards Program Global Map Server: Vs30
Ground Water Map◦ USDA Soils Data Mart: Depth to Water Table
Liquefaction Susceptibility◦ USDA Soils Data Mart: Liquid Limit, Plasticity Index, Water Content One-Third Bar
Landslide Susceptibility◦ USDA Soils Data Mart: Parent Material Name, Representative Slope, Depth to Water Table
The final hazard maps were used as direct imports into the Hazus study region for the GBS evaluations and also as a source layer to populate the corresponding attribute fields in the UDF inventory. Instead of using the single value at the location of the UDF point, a weighted average of all hazard values within the parcel was used to better estimate the average conditions throughout a building structure.
The updated hazard maps are polygon feature classes stored in an ArcGIS Personal Geodatabase and the attributes are stored in a field named “TYPE”. The specific schema requirements to build the HazusHazards Map database are available in the Hazus-MH 2.1 Earthquake User’s Guide Appendix K.
NEHRP Soils Classification
The NEHRP soil classification is based on Table B.1 in the Hazus 2.1 Earthquake User’s Manual where the soil types ‘A’ trough ‘F’ are equated to ranges of values of shear wave velocity (Vs). The USGS Earthquake Hazards Program provides Vs30 maps, where the value of the Vs30 is the average shear velocity down to 30 meters. These Vs30 values were downloaded from the USGS site as an ASCII text file and exported to a point shapefile. Then the ArcGIS Create Thiessen Polygons tool was used to generate a seamless polygon shapefile from the points and attributed with the associated soil type based on the Vs30 values.
Soil Type General Description Vs (m/s)A Hard Rock Vs > 1500B Rock 760 < Vs ≤ 1500C Hard and/or stiff/very stiff soils; most gravels 360 < Vs ≤ 760D Sand, silts, and/or stiff/very stiff clays, some gravels.
Having average blow counts of 15 ≤ N <‐ 50 or average shear strength of 50 kPa ≤ S ≤ 100 kPa
180 < Vs ≤ 360
E Having thickness lower than 3 meters and PI > 20, w ≥ 40% and su < 25 kPa soft clay
Vs < 180
F Needs specific calculations
Ground Water Map
The ground water depths are based on the Depth to Water Table attributes extracted from the USDA Soils Data Mart database. This dataset provides the depth to the water table in meters for each of the SSURGO (Soil Survey Geographic) polygon features. The only data manipulation required was to convert the depth provided in centimeters to the equivalent value in meters.
Liquefaction Susceptibility
The liquefaction susceptibility classifications were determined based on methods presented by Jonathan D. Bray from the University of California, Berkeley. In this journal article it is presented that correlations between the plasticity index, liquid limit and water content (1/3 Bar) can be used to determine a soils susceptibility to liquefaction.Bray, Jonathan D., and Rodolfo B. Sancio, “Liquefaction Susceptibility of Fine-Grained Soils”, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, USA. ICGEE 2004.
Landslide Susceptibility
Based on Table 4.15 of the Earthquake User’s Manual, the landslide susceptibility classifications can be determined by a combination of geologic group (A, B or C) and slope angle (in degrees) in either wet or dry conditions. From the Soils Data Mart database the Parent Material Name was used to determine the geologic group, the Representative Slope was used to determine the appropriate degree range and the Depth to Water Table was used to determine which locations had groundwater at the ground surface. Combining these three datasets, Table 4.15 was then used to determine the landslide susceptibility classification for each soil.
Load into HazusGBS Study◦ Load .mdb with hazard maps into study region.◦ Choose each features class to overwrite the
standard ‘risk’ defaults for each parameter.UDF Study◦ Use polygon hazard maps to assign a ‘risk’ value
to each building.Can use single point or a weighted average per building footprint or parcel.
◦ Import these values with the UDF table.
Updated GBS Annualized Loss
UDF Annualized Loss
SummaryStudy completed for Autauga County, AL◦ Analysis utilizing building specific data
Building footprint locationsParcel based attributes
◦ Hazard DataFlood: engineered depth gridsHurricane: no updatesEarthquake: updated hazard maps
NEHRP Soils ClassificationGround water depthLiquefaction SusceptibilityLandslide Susceptibility
www.dewberry.co
m
National Capitol Region HAZUS User Group
(NCRHUG)
How To Technical Series
2011 BCAR Re-Engineered Depth-Damage Curves in Hazus
James Mawby, CFM
June 2013
www.dewberry.co
m
Background
• FEMA’s BCA is the tool to determine economic viability of
mitigation projects.
• Hazus, although similar, is not the same. But what benefit
might exist to use the same curves in Hazus as exist in
BCA?
• Notably, BCA includes newer curves for coastal residential
damages.
• Here’s an attempt to get the new BCA curves into Hazus.
www.dewberry.co
m
Step 1 - Reference
• Step 1 – assemble references
www.dewberry.co
m
Step 2 – Hazus Curves
• Where are the Hazus curves?
– Front end (Assumption - Beneficial for adding a curve or two)
www.dewberry.co
m
Step 2 – Hazus Curves
• Where are the Hazus curves?
– Back end (Assumption - Beneficial for adding Multiple Curves)
www.dewberry.co
m
Step 3 – Curve & dB Structure
• Review / Understand Curve Tables and Relationships
– Structure curves, Contents Curves, Inventory Curves, Other…etc
– Which tables relate to others
Always wise to back-up files before editing
www.dewberry.co
m
Step 3 – Curve & dB Structure
• Review / Understand Curve Tables and Relationships
– Example from BCAR
www.dewberry.co
m
Step 4 – Interim Curve Table Development
• Mass population or addition of curves
– Use of Excel
• Drag & Fill to propagate addition of sequentially numbered “DmgFnID”
• Copy/Paste to propagate values in “Occupancy” field
• Copy/Paste to fill % damage in each depth value column
www.dewberry.co
m
Step 4 – Interim Xref Table Development
• Mass population or addition of curves
– Use of Excel
• Copy/Paste to propagate values in “SOccupId” field
• Drag & Fill to propagate addition of sequentially numbered “DmgFnID”
• Copy/Paste to fill TRUE/FALSE values
Most curves apply to RES1, RES3A & RES3B also RES2 but not shown here.
www.dewberry.co
m
Step 5 – Run a Test
• Load the Interim Tables in Excel into Access dB
• Replace the default Access dB with the revised
• Perform Region Creation
• Perform Region set-up as per desired
– I chose to perform a User-Defined Facility (UDF) exercise
www.dewberry.co
m
Step 5 – Run a Test
• Tested with User-Defined Facilities (UDF)
– Where user can define DmgFnID’s in UDF table
User defines the DmgFnID in these fields
www.dewberry.co
m
Step 5 – Examine Results
• Initial testing revealed that the TRUE/FALSE values of the
XREF Table were not set properly.
– Assumption: it was initially assumed that if the DmgFnID was
defined in the UDF Table, the model would use it.
– This was not true; the stock-set default curves were used.
– TRUE/FALSE settings were adjusted and results for the added
curves were obtained.
www.dewberry.co
m
Step 5 – Examine Results
• Visual Comparison
– Structure Damage, Coastal V-Zone, RES1
The check-boxes are controlled by the TRUE & FALSE values of the Xref Table in flDmRsFn.mdb - Access dB
www.dewberry.co
m
Step 5 – Examine Results
ID
FFht DG Depth in
BLDG
Default BCAR
Foundation
ReturnPeriodId BldgDmgPct
BldgLossUSD ContDmgPct
ContentLossUSD
InventoryLossUSD
ReturnPeriodId BldgDmgPct
BldgLossUSD ContDmgPct
ContentLossUSD
InventoryLossUSD
1 Pier
2.50
1.44 -1.06 100 4.85 $ 8,470.44 3.53
$ 3,080.16 $ - 100 5.29
$ 9,240.48 4.41
$ 3,850.20 $ -
2 Pier
1.50
1.32 -0.18 100 5.82 $ 4,212.71 3.88
$ 1,404.24 $ - 100 3.88
$ 2,808.48 3.23
$ 1,170.20 $ -
3 Crawl
1.25
1.23 -0.02 100 11.23 $ 11,864.27 8.70
$ 4,594.67 $ - 100 15.04
$ 15,881.29 14.67
$ 7,748.10 $ -
Percent Damage
BldgDmgFnId Occupancy Source Description ft04m ft03m ft02m ft01m ft00 ft01…etc Comment
686 RES1 BCAR - Jan 2011 all floors, Elevated (Obstr)+2ft - no
basement, Coastal A or V Zone 1 22 53 93 100 100 RAMPP Inserted
• Examine & Question Results
• Example 3 Buildings; oceanfront – Hurricane Sandy
#1 #2 #3 Floated away…see next slide
www.dewberry.co
m
Step 5 – Examine Results
• Building #3
www.dewberry.co
m
What’s Next?
• Question Results
– Were the curves entered and translated correctly?
– Were appropriate checkboxes (TRUE/FALSE) settings used?
– Can dollar values be verified with Individual Assistance (IA) data?
– Do curves require adjustments based on actual losses?
– Do we need curves for floating buildings?
• How does this relate to BCA?
– Is there ever a chance Hazus and BCA might be one in the
same?
– How does adding these BCA curves to Hazus promote and
possibly assist such an integration?
www.dewberry.co
m
Contact Information
HUG Leader:
Cynthia McCoy
Risk Analyst - FEMA Reg. III
615 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Phone: 215-931-5530
cynthia.mccoy@fema.dhs.gov
Presenter:
James R. Mawby, CFM
Project Geographer
Dewberry LLC, Water Resources Consulting Division
8401 Arlington Boulevard
Fairfax, VA 22031
703.849.0528
jmawby@dewberry.com
Reminder: HAZUS Data & Training Collaboration
NCR HUG Google Drive shared site has been set up to facilitate HAZUS data and training collaboration. This site will allow any registered user to
(1) post a description of data/results they have to share with others, (2) post a request of enhanced datasets or results that other’s might have already done, (3) post information about an upcoming training, and (4) post a request for training on a specific or general topic.
• To register, email your Gmail ID to Jenna (jenna.mcgee@amec.com)
and the files will be shared with you. If you do not already have a Gmail ID, it is free to sign up for one.
6
Next Call
Thursday July 25, 2013 at 10AM EST Use the same number and conference code: Call 1-267-507-0240 and enter this conference code # 697620 **Request volunteer for next month’s presentation
• Recent HAZUS project • HAZUS “How to” presentation
Meeting notes and an updated presentation with audio will be sent out after the call Adjourn
7