Post on 28-Dec-2015
Federalism in the Obama
Administration
Thomas GaisDirector
The Rockefeller Institute of Government
Skidmore College
February 7, 2013
2
Federalism in the Obama Administration Questions:
How have the relationships between the national and state/local governments—or their respective responsibilities and powers—changed during the Obama Administration?
In these current relationships and distributions of power, what are the challenges for effective governance?
Basic points: Obama Administration has a large, activist domestic policy agenda, and that
necessarily means that federalism is critical to its success, even if the Administration cares little about the value of federalism itself
Although its ways of acting on and through the federal system are not unprecedented, they are distinctive in approach and intensity.
But its effectiveness in working through state/local governments is challenged by several developments, including the state fiscal crisis, political polarization, and demographic shifts.
3
Role of states in U.S. domestic programsPublic employment as percentage of labor force is neither high nor low compared to other nations
U.S. is distinctive in its reliance on state and local governments to implement domestic policies:Percent of all government employees working in state & local governments
Rockefeller Institute of Government
4
State and local governments spend most of the money supporting domestic programs in the U.S.Domestic expenditures by different levels of government, 1977-2010
Spending as percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
1st year of Obama Administration
While SLGs spend more, the national government raises more revenues: Government own-source revenues as percent of GDP, 1977-2010
Rockefeller Institute of Government
6
National
National government assistance to state & local governments, as percent of GDP
Rockefeller Institute of Government
7
Different levels of government spending money in different ways, but much overlap tooExpenditures, by level of government, in billions of dollars (2010)
Federal State Local
Environment/natural resources 45 38 160
Public safety 56 68 160
Education 71 255 617
Transportation 93 161 90
Health 909 444 131
Income support/public welfare 1,706 65 46
Major elements of Obama Administration’s assertive form of federalism1) Will spend money—and lots of it
2) Can very assertive, perhaps “coercive”
3) Uses competition to make big changes
4) Exercises executive powers, esp. waivers
5) Opportunistic, in support of policy aims; i.e., does not support “federalism” as goal Uses state discretion to advance policies through states Uses state discretion to advance aims where national
coalitions are blocked
Rockefeller Institute of Government
9
Growing challenges to the U.S. federal system as a vehicle for policy change: 1) Weakening state revenue system: state government tax revenues, 1995-2012 (in constant 2011 dollars)
In addition to decline in state revenues, greater volatility and uncertainty in taxes; budget pressures too
Rockefeller Institute of Government
11
2) Another challenge for U.S. federalism: growing spatial mis-match between resources and needs. Population shifts (percent changes, by age, 2000-2010)
Rockefeller Institute of Government
12
Changes in where social needs are greatest: increasing number of low-income children live in South and Mountain states
Rockefeller Institute of Government
13
Percent changes in number of low-income children (125 pct of FPL) since 1998
Sources: Census Bureau.
But the states where the most vulnerable children live have the smallest programs to support them
Rockefeller Institute of Government
14
Education spending per child
Social policy spending per child in poverty
For more on these issues, see http://www.firstfocus.net/library/reports/children-southwestern-states-and-the-federalism-problem
3) Deepening divisions among states; growing polarization and divisions even at state level Responses to welfare reform in 1990s vs. health care
reform in 2010—rejection of health care exchanges
Republican governors have also turned down funding for high speed rail
Less pragmatism among governors, especially on the Right; fewer states have divided party government
Large regional differences in financial rules (tax and spending limits)—greatest in Western states
Rockefeller Institute of Government
15
4) Federal assistance to states may be less, and less powerful
Federal assistance to state and local governments is, other than Medicaid, largely discretionary—and that will be under severe pressure
SC decision found a limit on the power of congressional appropriations in requiring states to carry out directives attached to the dollars; hard to know where the line will be drawn
Rockefeller Institute of Government
16
The RockefellerInstitute of Government
The Public Policy Institute of theState University of New York
University at Albany
411 State StreetAlbany, NY 12203-1003
www.rockinst.org
Thomas L. GaisDirectorgaist@rockinst.org(518) 443-5831