Extensions of Single Site DMFT and its Applications to Correlated Materials

Gabriel Kotliar

Physics Department and

Center for Materials Theory

Rutgers UniversityWorkshop on Quantum Materials Heron Island Resort New Queensland Australia1-4 June 2005

On the road towards understanding superconductivity in strongly correlated materials

Mott Transition in the Actinide Series

Lashley et.al.

Mott transition in open (right) and closed (left) shell systems.

S S

U U

TLog[2J+1]

Uc

~1/(Uc-U)

J=0

???

Tc

Superconductivity is an unavoidable

consequence to the approach to the Mott

transition with a singlet closed shell

state.

•Cuprate superconductors and the Hubbard Model . PW Anderson 1987 . Connect superconductivity to an RVB Mott insulator. Science 235, 1196 (1987). Hubbard , t-J model .

•Baskaran Zhou and Anderson (1987). slave boson approach, S-wave

Pairing. Connection to an insulator with a Fermi surface.

.

RVB phase diagram of the Cuprate Superconductors and Superexchange.

• The approach to the Mott insulator renormalizes the kinetic energy . Kinetic energy renormalizes to zero.

• Attraction in the d wave channel of order J Not renormalized. Trvb increases.

• The proximity to the Mott insulator reduce the charge stiffness , TBE goes to zero.

• Superconducting dome. Pseudogap evolves continously into the superconducting state.

G. Kotliar and J. Liu Phys.Rev. B 38,5412 (1988 singlet formation order parameters

Problems with the approach.

• Neel order. How to continue a Neel insulating state ?• Stability of the pseudogap state at finite temperature.

[Ubbens and Lee] • Missing incoherent spectra . [ fluctuations of slave

bosons ]• Temperature dependence of the penetration depth [Wen

and Lee , Ioffe and Millis ] . Theory:[T]=x-Ta x2 , Exp: [T]= x-T a.

• Mean field is too uniform on the Fermi surface, in contradiction with ARPES.

The development of DMFT solves many of these problems.!!

Also, one would like to be able to evaluate from the theory itself when the approximation is reliable!!

0

1 2

( , ) ( )

( )(cos cos ) ( )(cos .cos ) .......latt k

kx ky kx ky

Cluster Extensions of Single Site DMFT

cluster cluster exterior exteriorH H H H

H clusterH

Simpler "medium" Hamiltonian

cluster exterior exteriorH H

Medium of free electrons :

impurity model.Solve for

the medium usingSelf

Consistency.

Extraction of lattice quantities.

G.. Kotliar,S. Savrasov, G. Palsson and G. Biroli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 186401 (2001)

U/t=4.

Testing CDMFT (G.. Kotliar,S. Savrasov, G. Palsson and G. Biroli, Phys. Rev.

Lett. 87, 186401 (2001) ) with two sites in the Hubbard model in one dimension V. Kancharla C. Bolech and GK PRB 67, 075110 (2003)][[M.Capone M.Civelli V Kancharla C.Castellani and GK PR B 69,195105 (2004) ]

Finite T Mott transtion in CDMFT Parcollet Biroli and GK PRL, 92, 226402. (2004))

Evolution of the spectral function at low frequency.

( 0, )vs k A k

If the k dependence of the self energy is weak, we expect to see contour lines corresponding to t(k) = const and a height increasing as we approach the Fermi surface.

k

k2 2

k

Ek=t(k)+Re ( , 0)

= Im ( , 0)

( , 0)Ek

k

k

A k

Evolution of the k resolved Spectral Function at zero frequency. (QMC

study Parcollet Biroli and GK PRL, 92, 226402. (2004)) ) ( 0, )vs k A k

Uc=2.35+-.05, Tc/D=1/44. Tmott~.01 W

U/D=2 U/D=2.25

Physical Interpretation

• Momentum space differentiation. The Fermi liquid –Bad Metal, and the Bad Insulator - Mott Insulator regime are realized in two different regions of momentum space.

• Cluster of impurities can have different characteristic temperatures. Coherence along the diagonal incoherence along x and y directions.

† †

, ,

( )( )ij ij i j j i i ii j i

t c c c c U n n

Cuprate superconductors and the Hubbard Model . PW Anderson 1987

.

• Allows the investigation of the normal state underlying the superconducting state, by forcing a symmetric Weiss function, we can follow the normal state near the Mott transition.

• Earlier studies (Katsnelson and Lichtenstein, M. Jarrell, M Hettler et. al. Phys. Rev. B 58, 7475 (1998). T. Maier et. al. Phys. Rev. Lett

85, 1524 (2000) ) used QMC as an impurity solver and DCA as cluster scheme.

• We use exact diag ( Krauth Caffarel 1995 with effective temperature 32/t=124/D ) as a solver and Cellular DMFT as the mean field scheme.

CDMFT study of cuprates

Superconducting State t’=0

• Does the Hubbard model superconduct ?

• Is there a superconducting dome ?

• Does the superconductivity scale with J ?

Superconductivity in the Hubbard model role of the Mott transition and influence of the super-

exchange. ( work with M. Capone V. Kancharla. CDMFT+ED, 4+ 8 sites t’=0) .

Superconducting State t’=0

• Does it superconduct ?

• Yes. Unless there is a competing phase.

• Is there a superconducting dome ?

• Yes. Provided U /W is above the Mott transition .

• Does the superconductivity scale with J ?

• Yes. Provided U /W is above the Mott transition .

Competition of AF and SC

AF

AF+SC

SC

or

AFSC

D wave Superconductivity and Antiferromagnetism t’=0 M. Capone V. Kancharla (see also VCPT Senechal and

Tremblay ). Antiferromagnetic (left) and d wave superconductor (right) Order Parameters

Competition of AF and SC

AF

AF+SC

SC

8U tf

or

AF

SC

U /t << 8

•Can we connect the superconducting state with the “underlying “normal” state “ ?

What does the underlying “normal” state look like ?

Follow the “normal state” with doping. Evolution of the spectral

function at low frequency.( 0, )vs k A k

If the k dependence of the self energy is weak, we expect to see contour lines corresponding to Ek = const and a height increasing as we approach the Fermi surface.

k

k2 2

k

Ek=t(k)+Re ( , 0)

= Im ( , 0)

( , 0)Ek

k

k

A k

: Spectral Function A(k,ω→0)= -1/π G(k, ω →0) vs k U=16 t

hole doped

K.M. Shen et.al. 2004

2X2 CDMFT

Approaching the Mott transition: CDMFT Picture

• Fermi Surface Breakup. Qualitative effect, momentum space differentiation. Formation of hot –cold regions is an unavoidable consequence of the approach to the Mott insulating state!

• D wave gapping of the single particle spectra as the Mott transition is approached.

• Similar scenario was encountered in previous study of the kappa organics. O Parcollet G. Biroli and G. Kotliar PRL, 92, 226402. (2004) .

What about the electron doped semiconductors ?

Spectral Function A(k,ω→0)= -1/π G(k, ω →0) vs k

electron doped

P. Armitage et.al. 2001

Civelli et.al. 2004

Momentum space differentiation a we approach the Mott

transition is a generic phenomena.

Location of cold and hot regions depend on parameters.

o Qualitative Difference between the hole doped and the electron doped phase diagram is due to the underlying normal state.” In the hole doped, it has nodal quasiparticles near (,/2) which are ready “to become the superconducting quasiparticles”. Therefore the superconducing state can evolve continuously to the normal state. The superconductivity can appear at very small doping.

o Electron doped case, has in the underlying normal state quasiparticles leave in the ( 0) region, there is no direct road to the superconducting state (or at least the road is tortuous) since the latter has QP at (/2, /2).

Can we connect the superconducting state with the “underlying “normal” state “ ?

Yes, within our resolution in the hole doped case.

No in the electron doped case.

What does the underlying “normal state “ look like ? Unusual distribution of spectra (Fermi arcs) in the normal

state.

Mott transition into a low entropy insulator. Is superconuctivity realized in Am ?

Density functional based electronic structure calculations: Non magnetic LDA/GGA predicts volume 50% off. Magnetic GGA corrects most of error in volume but gives m~6B (Soderlind et.al., PRB 2000). Experimentally, Am has non magnetic f6 ground state with J=0 (7F0)

Mott Transition?“Soft”

“Hard”

Am under pressure: J.C. GriveauJ. Rebizant G. Lander G. Kotliar PRL (2005)

• Mott transition into a low entropy insulator. Is it realized in Am ?

• Yes! But there are additional suprises, which are specific to Am, such as the second maximum in Tc vs pressure. Additional system specific properties.

Conclusions

• Correlated Electron materials, as a second frontier in materials science research, the “in between “ regime between itinerant and localizedis very interesting.

• Getting the general picture, and the material specific details are both important..

• Mott transition : open shell (finite T Mott endpoint in V2O3, NiSeS, K-organics, Pu ) closed shell case (Am, cuprates…….)connection to superconductivity.

• The challenge of material design using correlated materials.

• DMFT is a useful mean field tool to study correlated electrons. Provide a zeroth order picture of a physical phenomena.

• Provide a link between a simple system (“mean field reference frame”) and the physical system of interest. [Sites, Links, and Plaquettes]

• Formulate the problem in terms of local quantities (which we can usually compute better).

• Allows to perform quantitative studies and predictions . Focus on the discrepancies between experiments and mean field predictions.

• Generate useful language and concepts. Follow mean field states as a function of parameters.

• Controlled approach!

Conclusions

Conjecture, Mott transition with Zcold finite ? Continuity with the

insulator at one point in the zone.

Conjecture, Mott transition with Zcold finite ? Continuity with the

insulator at one point in the zone.

Conjecture, Mott transition with Zcold finite ? Continuity with the

insulator at one point in the zone.

Is the formation of the hot and cold regions is the result of the proximity

to Antiferromagnetism ?Study various values of t’/t, U=16.

Introduce much larger frustration: t’=.9t U=16t

n=.69 .92 .96

Is the momentum space differentiation a result of proximity to an ordered state , e.g. antiferromagnetism?

Fermi Surface Breakup or Momentum space differentiation takes place irrespectively of the value of t’. The gross features are the result of the proximity to a Mott insulating state irrespective of whether there is magnetic long range order.

How is the Mott insulatorapproached from the

superconducting state ?

Work in collaboration with M. Capone

Evolution of the low energy tunneling density of state with doping. Decrease of spectral weight

as the insulator is approached. Low energy

particle hole symmetry.

Alternative view

Approaching the Mott transition:

• Qualitative effect, momentum space differentiation. Formation of hot –cold regions is an unavoidable consequence of the approach to the Mott insulating state!

• General phenomena, but the location of the cold regions depends on parameters.

• With the present resolution, t’ =.9 and .3 are similar. However it is perfectly possible that at lower energies further refinements and differentiation will result from the proximity to different ordered states.

• Further understanding of phenomena of momentum space differentiation.

• Analyze the results in terms of a few (three!) self energy functions.

Fermi Surface Shape Renormalization ( teff)ij=tij+ Re(ij

Fermi Surface Shape Renormalization

• Photoemission measured the low energy renormalized Fermi surface.

• If the high energy (bare ) parameters are doping independent, then the low energy hopping parameters are doping dependent. Another failure of the rigid band picture.

• Electron doped case, the Fermi surface renormalizes TOWARDS nesting, the hole doped case the Fermi surface renormalizes AWAY from nesting. Enhanced magnetism in the electron doped side.

Understanding the location of the hot and cold regions.

LDA+DMFT spectra. Notice the rapid occupation of the f7/2 band,

(5f)7

Photoemission Spectrum from Photoemission Spectrum from 77FF00 Americium Americium

LDA+DMFT Density of States

Experimental Photoemission Spectrum(after J. Naegele et.al, PRL 1984)

S. Savrasov et. al. Multiplet Effects

F(0)=4.5 eV F(2)=8.0 eVF(4)=5.4 eV F(6)=4.0 eV

J. C. Griveau et. al. (2004)

H.Q. Yuan et. al. CeCu2(Si2-x Gex). Am under pressure Griveau et. al.

Superconductivity due to valence fluctuations ?

Cluster DMFT for organics ?

CDMFT for organics ?

Evidence for unconventional interaction underlying in

two-dimensional correlated electronsF. Kagawa,1 K. Miyagawa,1, 2 & K. Kanoda1, 2

Conclusions and Outlook

• Motivation: Mott transition in Americium and Plutonium. In both cases theory (DMFT) and experiment suggest gradual subtle changes.

• DMFT: Physical connection between spectra and structure. Studied the Mott transition open and closed shell cases. .

• DMFT: method under construction, but it already gives quantitative results and qualitative insights. Interactions between theory and experiments.

• Pu: simple picture of alpha delta and epsilon. Interplay of lattice and electronic structure near the Mott transition.

• Am: Rich physics, mixed valence under pressure ? Superconductivity near the Mott transition.

•

Actinides and The Mott PhenomenaEvolution of the electronic structure between the atomic limit and

the band limit in an open shell situation.The “”in between regime” is ubiquitous central theme in

strongly correlated systems.Actinides allow us to probe this physics in ELEMENTS. Mott

transition across the actinide series [ B. Johansson Phil Mag. 30,469 (1974)] . Revisit the problem using a new insights and new techniques from the solution of the Mott transition problem within DMFT in a model Hamiltonian.

Use the ideas and concepts that resulted from this development to give physical qualitative insights into real materials.

Turn the technology developed to solve simple models into a practical quantitative electronic structure method .

Collaborators References

• Reviews: A. Georges G. Kotliar W. Krauth and M. Rozenberg RMP68 , 13, (1996).

• Reviews: G. Kotliar S. Savrasov K. Haule V. Oudovenko O. Parcollet and C. Marianetti. Submitted to RMP (2005).

• Gabriel Kotliar and Dieter Vollhardt Physics Today 57,(2004)

Understanding the result in terms of cluster self energies (eigenvalues)

(0, )

~ ( , )

(0,0)

A

B

A

Systematic Evolution

Dynamical Mean-Field Theory

A. Georges, G. Kotliar Phys. Rev. B 45, 6497(1992)Review: G. Kotliar and D. Vollhardt Physics Today 57,(2004)

†

0 0 0

( )[ ( ')] ( ')o o o oc c U n nb b b

s st m t t tt ¯

¶+ - D - +

¶òò ò

( )wD

†( )( ) ( )

MFo n o n SG c i c is sw w D=- á ñ

1( )[ ]

1( )

( )[ ][ ]

nk

n kn

G ii t

G i

ww m

w

D =D - - +

D

å

† †

, ,

( )( )ij ij i j j i i ii j i

t c c c c U n n

Mean-Field Classical vs Quantum

Classical case Quantum case

A. Georges, G. Kotliar Phys. Rev. B 45, 6497(1992)Review: G. Kotliar and D. Vollhardt Physics Today 57,(2004)

†

0 0 0

( )[ ( ')] ( ')o o o oc c U n nb b b

s st m t t tt ¯

¶+ - D - +

¶òò ò

( )wD

†( )( ) ( )

MFo n o n SG c i c is sw w D=- á ñ

1( )[ ]

1( )

( )[ ][ ]

nk

n kn

G ii t

G i

ww m

w

D =D - - +

D

å

,ij i j i

i j i

J S S h S- -å å

MF eff oH h S=-

effh

0 0 ( )MF effH hm S=á ñ

eff ij jj

h J m h= +å

† †

, ,

( )( )ij ij i j j i i ii j i

t c c c c U n n

10G-

DMFT as an approximation to the Baym Kadanoff functional

[ , , 0, 0, ]

[ ] [ ] [ ]

DMFT

atomij ij i ii ii i ii

Gii ii Gij ij i j

TrLn i t ii Tr G G

[ , ] [ ] [ ] [ ]ij ijG TrLn i t Tr G G

[ ] Sum 2PI graphs with G lines andU G vertices

CDMFT vs single site DMFT and other cluster methods.

Cellular DMFT

43

21

Site Cell. Cellular DMFT. C-DMFT. G.. Kotliar,S. Savrasov, G. Palsson and G. Biroli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 186401 (2001)

tˆ(K) hopping expressed in the superlattice notations.

•Other cluster extensions (DCA Jarrell Krishnamurthy, M

Hettler et. al. Phys. Rev. B 58, 7475 (1998)Katsnelson and Lichtenstein periodized scheme, Nested Cluster Schemes , causality

issues, O. Parcollet, G. Biroli and GK Phys. Rev. B 69, 205108 (2004)

Estimates of upper bound for Tc exact diag. M. Capone. U=16t, t’=0, (

t~.35 ev, Tc ~140 K~.005W)

DMFT : What is the dominant atomic configuration ,what is the fate of the atomic moment ?

• Snapshots of the f electron :Dominant configuration:(5f)5

• Naïve view Lz=-3,-2,-1,0,1, ML=-5 B, ,S=5/2 Ms=5 B . Mtot=0

• More realistic calculations, (GGA+U),itineracy, crystal fields ML=-3.9 Mtot=1.1. S. Y. Savrasov and G. Kotliar, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 3670 (2000)

• This moment is quenched or screened by spd electrons, and other f electrons. (e.g. alpha Ce).

Contrast Am:(5f)6

Anomalous Resistivity

PRL 91,061401 (2003)

The delta –epsilon transition

• The high temperature phase, (epsilon) is body centered cubic, and has a smaller volume than the (fcc) delta phase.

• What drives this phase transition?

• LDA+DMFT functional computes total energies opens the way to the computation of phonon frequencies in correlated materials (S. Savrasov and G. Kotliar 2002). Combine linear response and DMFT.

Epsilon Plutonium.

Phonon entropy drives the epsilon delta phase transition

• Epsilon is slightly more delocalized than delta, has SMALLER volume and lies at HIGHER energy than delta at T=0. But it has a much larger phonon entropy than delta.

• At the phase transition the volume shrinks but the phonon entropy increases.

• Estimates of the phase transition following Drumont and G. Ackland et. al. PRB.65, 184104 (2002); (and neglecting electronic entropy). TC ~ 600 K.

Total Energy as a function of volume for Total Energy as a function of volume for Pu Pu W (ev) vs (a.u. 27.2 ev)

(Savrasov, Kotliar, Abrahams, Nature ( 2001)Non magnetic correlated state of fcc Pu.

iw

Zein Savrasov and Kotliar (2004)

Expt. Wong et. al.

Alpha and delta Pu

. ARPES measurements on NiS2-xSex

Matsuura et. Al Phys. Rev B 58 (1998) 3690. Doniaach and Watanabe Phys. Rev. B 57, 3829 (1998)

One Particle Local Spectral Function and

Angle Integrated Photoemission

• Probability of removing an electron and transfering energy =Ei-Ef,

f() A() M2

• Probability of absorbing an electron and transfering energy =Ei-Ef,

(1-f()) A() M2

• Theory. Compute one particle greens function and use spectral function.

e

e

QP in V2O3 was recently found Mo et.al

organics• ET = BEDT-TTF=Bisethylene dithio tetrathiafulvalene

(ET)2 X

Increasing pressure ----- increasing t’ ------------

X0 X1 X2 X3• (Cu)2CN)3 Cu(NCN)2 Cl Cu(NCN2)2Br Cu(NCS)2• Spin liquid Mott transition

Vanadium Oxide Transport under pressure. Limelette etal

Failure of the StandardModel: Anomalous Spectral Weight Transfer

Optical Conductivity o of FeSi for T=20,40, 200 and 250 K from Schlesinger et.al (1993)

0( )d

Neff depends on T

RESTRICTED SUM RULES

0( ) ,eff effd P J

iV

, ,eff eff effH J P

M. Rozenberg G. Kotliar and H. Kajueter PRB 54, 8452, (1996).

2

0( ) ,

ned P J

iV m

ApreciableT dependence found.

, ,H hamiltonian J electric current P polarization

Below energy

2

2

kk

k

nk

1

10

1( ) ( )

( )n nn k nk

G i ii t i

w ww m w

-

-é ùê ú= +Sê ú- + - Sê úë ûå

DMFT Impurity cavity construction

1

10

1( ) ( )

V ( )n nk nk

D i ii

w ww

-

-é ùê ú= +Pê ú- Pê úë ûå

0

1 † 10 0 ( )( )[ ] ( ) [ ( ) ( ) ]n n n n S Gi G G i c i c ia bw w w w- -S = + á ñ

†

0 0

( ) ( , ') ( ') ( , ') o o o oc Go c n n Ub b

s st t t t d t t ¯+òò

† †

, ,

( )( )ij ij i j j i i ii j i

t c c c c U n n

()

1 100 0 0( )[ ] ( ) [ ( ) ( ) ]n n n n Si G D i n i n iw w w w- -P = + á ñ

,ij i j

i j

V n n

0 0( , ')Do n nt t+

Site Cell. Cellular DMFT. C-DMFT. G.. Kotliar,S. Savrasov, G. Palsson and G. Biroli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 186401 (2001)

tˆ(K) hopping expressed in the superlattice notations.

•Other cluster extensions (DCA Jarrell Krishnamurthy, M

Hettler et. al. Phys. Rev. B 58, 7475 (1998)Katsnelson and Lichtenstein periodized scheme, Nested Cluster Schemes , causality

issues, O. Parcollet, G. Biroli and GK Phys. Rev. B 69, 205108 (2004)

Mean-Field Classical vs Quantum

Quantum case

A. Georges, G. Kotliar Phys. Rev. B 45, 6497(1992)Review: G. Kotliar and D. Vollhardt Physics Today 57,(2004)

†

0 0 0

( )[ ( ')] ( ')o o o oc c U n nb b b

s st m t t tt ¯

¶+ - D - +

¶òò ò

( )wD†

( )( ) ( )MFo n o n SG c i c is sw w D=- á ñ

1( )[ ]

1( )

( )[ ][ ]

nk

n kn

G ii t

G i

ww

w

D =D - -

D

å

† †

, ,

( )( )ij ij i j j i i ii j i

t c c c c U n n

1( )] ( )

( )[ ]

1( )[ ]

( )]

[

[[ ]

n n nn

nk n n k

i i iG i

G ii i t

w m w ww

ww m w

+ - S =D -D

D =+ - S -å

Realistic DMFT loop

( )k LMTOt H k E® -LMTO

LL LH

HL HH

H HH

H H

é ùê ú=ê úë û

ki i Ow w®

10 niG i Ow e- = + - D

0 0

0 HH

é ùê úS =ê úSë û

0 0

0 HH

é ùê úD =ê úDë û

0

1 †0 0 ( )( )[ ] ( ) [ ( ) ( )HH n n n n S Gi G G i c i c ia bw w w w-S = + á ñ

110

1( ) ( )

( ) ( ) HH

LMTO HH

n nn k nk

G i ii O H k E i

w ww w

--é ùê ú= +Sê ú- - - Sê úë ûå

Other cluster extensions (DCA Jarrell Krishnamurthy, M Hettler et. al. Phys. Rev. B 58, 7475 (1998)Katsnelson and Lichtenstein periodized scheme. Causality issues O. Parcollet, G. Biroli and GK Phys. Rev. B 69, 205108 (2004)

Success story : Density Functional Linear Success story : Density Functional Linear ResponseResponse

Tremendous progress in ab initio modelling of lattice dynamics& electron-phonon interactions has been achieved(Review: Baroni et.al, Rev. Mod. Phys, 73, 515, 2001)

Limit of large lattice coordination1

~ d ij nearest neighborsijtd

† 1~i jc c

d

†

,

1 1~ ~ (1)ij i j

j

t c c d Od d

~O(1)i i

Un n

Metzner Vollhardt, 89

1( , )

( )k

G k ii i

Muller-Hartmann 89

Mean-Field Quantum Case

†0 0 0 0 0

H c c Un n

† †0 0 0 0

,

' ( )m l l ll

H t c A A c

Determine the parameters of the mediu t’ so as to get translation invariance on the average. A. Georges, G. Kotliar Phys. Rev. B 45, 6497(1992)

† †

, ,

( )( )ij ij i j j i i ii j i

H t c c c c U n n

†, ' '

, ',

'm l l l ll l

H t A A

H=Ho +Hm +Hm0

DMFT as an approximation to the Baym Kadanoff functional

[ , , 0, 0, ]

[ ] [ ] [ ]

DMFT

atomij ij i ii ii i ii

Gii ii Gij ij i j

TrLn i t ii Tr G G

[ , ] [ ] [ ] [ ]ij ijG TrLn i t Tr G G

[ ] Sum 2PI graphs with G lines andU G vertices

DMFT Cavity Construction. A. Georges and G. Kotliar PRB 45, 6479 (1992). First happy marriage of atomic and band physics.

Reviews: A. Georges G. Kotliar W. Krauth and M. Rozenberg RMP68 , 13, 1996 Gabriel Kotliar and Dieter Vollhardt Physics Today 57,(2004)

1( , )

( )k

G k ii i

LDA+DMFT Self-Consistency loop

G0 G

Im p u rityS o lver

S .C .C .

0( ) ( , , ) i

i

r T G r r i e w

w

r w+

= å

2| ( ) | ( )k xc k LMTOV H ka ac r c- Ñ + =

DMFT

U

Edc

0( , , )HHi

HH

i

n T G r r i e w

w

w+

= å

U/t=4.

Testing CDMFT (G.. Kotliar,S. Savrasov, G. Palsson and G. Biroli, Phys. Rev.

Lett. 87, 186401 (2001) ) with two sites in the Hubbard model in one dimension V. Kancharla C. Bolech and GK PRB 67, 075110 (2003)][[M.Capone M.Civelli V Kancharla C.Castellani and GK PR B 69,195105 (2004) ]

Mean-Field Classical vs Quantum

Quantum case

A. Georges, G. Kotliar Phys. Rev. B 45, 6497(1992)Review: G. Kotliar and D. Vollhardt Physics Today 57,(2004)

†

0 0 0

( )[ ( ')] ( ')o o o oc c U n nb b b

s st m t t tt ¯

¶+ - D - +

¶òò ò

( )wD†

( )( ) ( )MFo n o n SG c i c is sw w D=- á ñ

1( )[ ]

1( )

( )[ ][ ]

nk

n kn

G ii t

G i

ww

w

D =D - -

D

å

† †

, ,

( )( )ij ij i j j i i ii j i

t c c c c U n n

1( )] ( )

( )[ ]

1( )[ ]

( )]

[

[[ ]

n n nn

nk n n k

i i iG i

G ii i t

w m w ww

ww m w

+ - S =D -D

D =+ - S -å

DMFT and the Invar Model A. Lawson et. al. LA UR 04-6008 (LANL)

A. C. Lawson et. al. LA UR 04-6008

F(T,V)=Fphonons+F2level

=125 K =.5 = 1400 KD

Invar model A. C. Lawson et. al. LA UR 04-6008

† †

, ,

( )( )ij ij i j j i i ii j i

t c c c c U n n

Cuprate superconductors and the Hubbard Model . PW Anderson 1987 . Connect superconductivity to an RVB Mott insulator. Science 235, 1196 (1987)

RVB phase diagram of the Cuprate Superconductors

• P.W. Anderson. Connection between high Tc and Mott physics. Science 235, 1196 (1987)

• Connection between the anomalous normal state of a doped Mott insulator and high Tc.

• Baskaran Zhou and Anderson Slave boson approach. <b> coherence order parameter.

singlet formation order parameters.

Site Cell. Cellular DMFT. C-DMFT. G.. Kotliar,S. Savrasov, G. Palsson and G. Biroli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 186401 (2001)

tˆ(K) hopping expressed in the superlattice notations.

•Other cluster extensions (DCA Jarrell Krishnamurthy, M

Hettler et. al. Phys. Rev. B 58, 7475 (1998)Katsnelson and Lichtenstein periodized scheme, Nested Cluster Schemes , causality

issues, O. Parcollet, G. Biroli and GK Phys. Rev. B 69, 205108 (2004)

† †

, ,

( )( )ij ij i j j i i ii j i

t c c c c U n n

Cuprate superconductors and the Hubbard Model . PW Anderson 1987

† †

, ,

( )( )ij ij i j j i i ii j i

t c c c c U n n

Cuprate superconductors and the Hubbard Model . PW Anderson 1987

Momentum Space Differentiation the high

temperature story T/W=1/88

Hole doped case t’=-.3t, U=16 t n=.71 .93 .97

Color scale x= .37 .15 .13

CDMFT one electron spectra n=.96 t’/t=.-.3 U=16 t

• i

Experiments. Armitage et. al. PRL (2001).Momentum dependence of the low-energy

Photoemission spectra of NCCO

K.M . Shen et. al. Science (2005).

For a review Damascelli et. al. RMP (2003)

Evolution of the real part of the self energies.

RVB states • G. Baskaran Z. Shou and P.W Anderson Solid State

Comm 63, 973 (1987). RVB state with Fermi surface ( 2 d, line of zeros ).

• G. Kotliar Phys. Rev. B37 ,3664 (1998). I Affleck and B. Marston. Phys.Rev. B 37, 3774 (1998). RVB State with four point zeros in 2d. Two states are related by Su(2) symmetry I Affleck Z.Zhou, T. Hsu P.W. Anderson PRB 38,745 (1998).

o G. Kotliar and J. Liu Phys.Rev. B 38,5412 (1988). Doping selects the d –wave superconductor as the most favorable RVB state away from half filling.

o Parallel development of RVG ideas with variational wave functions. C. Gross R. Joynt and T.M.Rice PRB 36, 381 (1987) F. C. Zhang C. Gros T M Rice and H Shiba Supercond. Scie Tech. 1, 36 (1988).

Comparison with Experiments in Cuprates: Spectral Function A(k,ω→0)= -1/π G(k, ω →0) vs k

hole doped electron doped

K.M. Shen et.al. 2004 P. Armitage et.al. 2001

2X2 CDMFT Civelli et.al. 2004