Post on 26-Jun-2020
© Lean Construction Institute
Evolution of Outcome Based ProcurementMalvin Whang, UCSF & Andrew Mittleman, Jacobs EngineeringOctober 5, 2016
© Lean Construction Institute
Evolution of Outcome Based Procurement
2
• ev·o·lu·tion - the gradual development of something, especially from a simple to a more complex form
• out·come – the way a thing turns out; a consequence
• pro·cure·ment - the act of obtaining equipment, materials, or supplies
© Lean Construction Institute
Objective
3
• Understand application of Plan Do Check Adjust (PDCA) process to project procurement
• Analyze procurement processes and their outcomes on projects
• Identify constraints in public contracting processes
© Lean Construction Institute
Presenters
4
• Malvin Whang AIA, LEED AP• Senior Program Manager, Capital Programs• UCSF
• Andrew Mittleman, CCM, LEED Green Associate
• Senior Project Manager• Jacobs Engineering
© Lean Construction Institute
UCSF Information
5
• University of California San Francisco• University of California• 10 campus University System• Health Science, Graduate schools• Medicine, Nursing, Dentistry & Pharmacy
• 11.56 Million GSF of space• $200M capital projects yearly• $2.7B in the next 5 years
© Lean Construction Institute
Procurement Methods
6
• Project Delivery types• Design Bid Build• CM At Risk• Design Build• Job Order Contracting
• Procurement• Lump Sum• Best Value• Task Order Pricing
© Lean Construction Institute
Project A
7
• CMAR with Design Build MEP
Owner A/E TeamQualifications
CM / GCBest Value
Elec DBBest Value
Mech DBBest Value
SubsLump Sum
© Lean Construction Institute
Outcome
8
• MEP Bridging Documents• Design Assist vs Design Build
• Team selection in silos• Big Room Collaboration
• Lean Journey• Together vs Separate
© Lean Construction Institute
Project H
9
• CMAR with Design Build MEP
Owner A/E TeamQualifications
CM / GCBest Value
Elec DBBest Value
Mech DBBest Value
SubsLump Sum
© Lean Construction Institute
Outcome
10
• Countermeasures -
• MEP Bridging Documents• Design Criteria
• Team selection in silos• Big Room Collaboration
• Lean Journey• Goal alignment workshop
• More issues
• Bids in silos• Optimization of the whole
© Lean Construction Institute
Project C
11
• CMAR with Design Build MEP
Owner A/E TeamQualifications
CM / GCBest Value
Elec DBBest Value
Mech DBBest Value
SubsLump Sum
© Lean Construction Institute
Outcome
12
• Countermeasures -
• MEP DB subs bid in teams• Reduce scope gaps• Optimize the system
• Team selection in silos• Big Room Collaboration
• Lean Journey• Goal alignment workshop
© Lean Construction Institute
Project O
13
• Design-Build with Performance Based Criteria
Owner
Design TeamQualifications
D-B Cont.Qualifications
Elec DBQualifications
StructuralQualifications
Mech / Plumbing
DBQualifications
© Lean Construction Institute
Objective
14
• A starting point to create:• A Quality Work & Learning Environment• A Model of Architectural & Urban Design• A High Performing Building• Environmentally Sustainable• Durable & Long Lasting• Efficiently Serviced & Maintained• A Lean Program and Project Delivery Plan
• A plan and team to work with:• More than 10+ major owners• 6 Major projects within a 3 block radius• Over $1 billion in construction.• An aggressive development timeframe
© Lean Construction Institute
Process
15
© Lean Construction Institute
Outcome
16
• Design Build• Focus on Structural, MEP and Donor
Needs
• Clear Values• Full Design and Performance Criteria• Minimum acceptance levels
• Compatibility• Comprehensive Team Selection
• RFQ• Document Validation• RFP• Multiple Stakeholder Meetings
• Lean Journey• Started with the contract
© Lean Construction Institute
Questions?
17