Environmental and genetic influences on childhood growth trajectories

Post on 25-Feb-2016

44 views 0 download

Tags:

description

Environmental and genetic influences on childhood growth trajectories. Laura D Howe. Height matters!. Shorter stature is associated with: Increased risk of CVD, cardio-respiratory diseases, diabetes Lower success in careers, interviews, etc Lower reported life satisfaction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Environmental and genetic influences on childhood growth trajectories

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Environmental and genetic influences on childhood growth

trajectories

Laura D Howe

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Height matters!

Shorter stature is associated with:

• Increased risk of CVD, cardio-respiratory diseases, diabetes

• Lower success in careers, interviews, etc

• Lower reported life satisfaction

• Not being able to see the band at gigs

• Being missed out of photos

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Heritability of height

80-90%

Strongly predicted by mid-parental height

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Environmental influences on height

Barriers to reaching genetic height potential:

Poor child nutrition Child illness Low SEP

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Secular trends in height

Batty et al., Econ Hum Biol 2009

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Aim To explore environmental and genetic

influences on childhood height growth trajectories in ALSPAC

Comparisons with a cohort from Brazil (Pelotas) where possible

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

ALSPAC• Former County of Avon (Bristol)• >13,000 pregnant women and

recruited 1991/1992• Questionnaires, clinics, links to

routine data

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Height data in ALSPAC1. Birth lengths

2. Routine child health records

3. Research clinics

4. Questionnaires

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Data birth to ten years

Height measurements

Boys N= 7194 Median = 5IQR = 2-8

Girls N= 6733 Median = 5IQR = 2-8

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Analysis strategy

Fractional polynomials

Linear spline random effects models

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Height trajectories

4060

8010

012

014

0H

eigh

t (cm

)

0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120Age (months)

Boys Girls

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Methods: Influences on growth trajectories Fit indicators into multilevel models;

interaction with intercept and each growth period

Socioeconomic position: maternal education Maternal smoking during pregnancy: yes/no

(and partner smoking for comparison) Genetics: score of 20 ‘tall’ alleles

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Socioeconomicposition and height

Villermé (1829):French soldiersPoverty causes

short stature

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Socioeconomic position and height

What is already known? Low SEP = shorter height Socioeconomic differential may be narrowing as

countries develop

What is less well understood? Social patterning of postnatal growth When inequality emerges Changes over time & economic development

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Inequalities in heightAge / growth

periodMean growth rates by maternal education p value

Less than O-Level

O-Level A-Level Degree or above

Birth length (cm)

50.55 50.70 50.71 51.02 0.0003

0-3 months (cm/month)

3.84 3.83 3.83 3.82 0.97

3-10 months (cm/month)

1.68 1.69 1.70 1.67 0.57

10-29 months (cm/month)

0.95 0.96 0.96 0.97 0.028

29-120 months

(cm/month)

0.53 0.54 0.54 0.54 <0.0001

Howe et al, JECH, PMID: 20724285

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Inequalities in height in PelotasPelotas cohort ~4,000 births in 2004 Pelotas, South Brazil

Height trajectories modelled as in ALSPAC Inequality in trajectories Mediating factors

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Results: SEP inequalities in height trajectories in Pelotas girls

Age / growth period

Mean growth rates by maternal education P value

0-4 years 5-8 years 9+ years

Birth (cm) 47.54 (0.15) 47.81 (0.09) 47.97 (0.09) 0.0400-3 months (cm/month) 3.69 (0.04) 3.77 (0.02) 3.93 (0.02) <0.001

3-12 months (cm/month) 1.55 (0.02) 1.58 (0.01) 1.61 (0.01) 0.002

12-32 months (cm/month) 0.99 (0.01) 1.03 (0.01) 1.06 (0.01) <0.001

32-48 months (cm/month) 0.47 (0.01) 0.47 (0.01) 0.47 (0.01) 0.884

Matijasevich et al., Submitted

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Boys50

6070

8090

100

Pre

dict

ed h

eigh

t (cm

)

0 12 24 36 48Age (months)

Maternal education (years)

Girls

5060

7080

9010

0P

redi

cted

hei

ght (

cm)

0 12 24 36 48Age (months)

0-4 5-8 >= 9

Matijasevich et al., Submitted

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Mediators of height inequalities

Maternal educ Mediator Child height

Potential mediators considered: family income, marital status, maternal age, parity, skin colour, maternal height, smoking during pregnancy, gestational age, breast feeding

Matijasevich et al., Submitted

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Main mediator of inequalities in birth length: maternal height

Little attenuation of inequalities in postnatal growth

Matijasevich et al., Submitted

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Smoking during pregnancy and height

What is already known? Causal association with birth length

What is less well understood? Does the height differential persist? Associations with postnatal growth?

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Maternal smoking during pregnancy & child growth

Overall growth rate per month

Maternal smoking during pregnancy (SE)

Partner smoking during pregnancy

(SE)

Maternal – partner

heterogeneity

Birth length 50.74 cm -0.6275 (0.0830) 0.1095 (0.0698) <0.001

Growth 0-3mt 3.83 cm/month 0.0262 (0.0424) -0.0152 (0.0358) 0.46

Growth 3-10mt 1.68 cm/month 0.0476 (0.0196) 0.0063 (0.0166) 0.11

Growth 10-29mt 0.97 cm/month -0.0033 (0.0069) -0.0052 (0.0059) 0.83

Growth 29-120mt 0.53 cm/month -0.0020 (0.0024) -0.0012 (0.0020) 0.80

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Genes influencing height What is already known? GWAS on adult height:

- 180 SNPs explain ~10% variation - 20 SNPs explain ~3% variation

Infancy is a period of canalisation

What is less well understood? At what age do SNPs identified in adulthood

begin to affect growth?

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Genetic influences on heightBirth

length0-3

months3-10

months10-29

months29-120 months

Boys Mean birth length, cm (SD) or growth rate, cm per month (SD)

50.65 (1.784)

3.83 (0.204)

1.69 (0.200)

0.96 (0.091)

0.53 (0.037)

Allelic score, cm per month per tall allele (SE)

0.0327(0.0136)

p=0.016

-0.0014 (0.0061)

p=0.819

0.0056 (0.0028)

p=0.050

0.0043 (0.0010)

p=2x10-5

0.0016 (0.0003)

p=5x10-7

Girls Mean birth length, cm (SD) or growth rate, cm per month (SD)

49.64 (1.584)

3.86 (0.161)

1.84 (0.163)

0.90 (0.085)

0.53 (0.037)

Allelic score,cm per month per tall allele (SE)

0.0209 (0.0133)

p=0.117

0.0176 (0.0074)

p=0.017

-0.0011 (0.0020)

p=0.573

0.0046 (0.0010)

p=1x10-6

0.0008 (0.0003)

p=0.022

Paternoster & Howe et al., submitted

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Genetic influences on height

Paternoster & Howe et al., submitted

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

By age 10 Predicted height difference between

individual with 27 and 17 tall alleles (95th and 5th centiles) was: Boys2.97cm (0.50SD)Girls 2.12cm (0.34SD)

The equivalent comparison in the adult paper was:Combined 5cm (0.7SD)

Paternoster & Howe et al., submitted

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Conclusions Height inequality:

~ persists in UK, but is less than LMICs~ due to in utero factors in UK (maternal height)~ childhood factors also important in Brazil

Smoking during pregnancy affects birth length but not postnatal growth

SNPs identified in GWAS affect birth length and early childhood growth

School ofSocial and Community Medicine

University ofBRISTOL

Thank you Debbie Lawlor Kate Tilling

Lavinia Paternoster Alicia Matijasevich

Marie-Jo Brion, George Davey Smith, Dave Evans, Tim Frayling, Rachel Freathy, Bruna Galobardes, David Gunnell, Sam Leary, Sue Ring, Nic Timpson, Michael Weedon