Post on 31-Jan-2016
description
Energy for Transportation and Developments inPlug-in Vehicles
Guenter ConzelmannCenter for Energy, Environmental, and Economic Systems AnalysisDecision and Information Sciences Division (DIS)Argonne National Laboratory9700 South Cass AvenueArgonne, IL 60439
2
Why Electric Transportation?
The nation has an oil problem
– U.S. is refining more oil than it has, and consumes even more
The current high oil prices reflect the increasing global demand for a limited energy resource: China is number 2 in oil use and India is 6th…and growing
Oil is predominately a transportation energy problem, with economic, environmental, and geopolitical concerns for the nation
Oil is an energy security issue
Reliance on domestic oil is not sustainable, we cannot drill our way out of the problem
Even optimistic projections leave us heavily dependent on foreign oil
2
98
10
90
25
75
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
U.S. Rest of World
Reserves Production Consumption
3
Electric Vehicles: Are they Real?
Source: EPRI, 2009)
4
Electric Vehicles are Part of the Government-Industry Partnership Advanced Propulsion Portfolio Vision Portfolio approach as there is no clear winner Likely, the U.S. solution with include a mix of technologies with multiple fuel sources
(electricity, biofuels, alternative fuels, etc.)
5
Existing Battery Technologies do not yet Approach the Energy and Power in an Internal Combustion (IC) Engine R&D on New Technologies is still needed
6
HEV, PHEV, E-REV, BEV, AEV, CS, CD, V2G, etc.: Might as well Talk to my Dog???
7
The Main Concepts in Simple Terms
HEV: Hybrid electric vehicle (Ford Escape, Toyota Prius)– Small battery, gets recharged from regenerative breaking; very limited all-electric range
– No plug
PHEV: Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle– Larger battery; gets charged by plugging I
– Different drivetrain configurations
• Series: ICE turns generator which charges battery which runs electric motor (Chevy Volt)
• Parallel: ICE and electric motor both run the car simultaneously (Honda Insight)
• Mix
E-REV: Extended Range Electric Vehicle– A PHEV with a bigger battery for driving ranges of 40-60+ miles using only the battery (all-
electric driving); after which the gas engine starts
BEV: Battery Electric Vehicles– Pure electric vehicles; only has an electric drivetrain
– When your out of battery, you are out of battery
8
Basic Concept of a Plug-in Electric Vehicle
10 kWh JCSLi-ion battery
9
Different Ways of Controlling/Operating PHEVs Engines/Batteries
Blended Modes (conventional engine cycles on/off fairly frequently)
All-Electric Modes (conventional engine stays off for an extended period of time until the battery charge reaches a certain level; then starts up)
SOC: State of Charge (Battery)
10
There Will be a Substantial Cost Premium to Early Adopters; Estimates of Premium Vary Noticeably
0
5
10
15
20
25
Conventional HEV(e.g., Prius)
PHEV10 (4kWh)
PHEV20 (8kWh)
E-REV30 (12kWh)
E-REV40 (16kWh)
Inc
rem
en
tal
Co
st
ov
er
Co
nv
en
tio
na
l (1
00
0$
) Argonne NAS 2015 Probable NAS 2015 Optimistic
11
Estimated Paybacks Can be Very Long; But the More you Drive (and the Higher the Price of Gasoline), the Better it is
Source: Sharer and Rousseau, 2009, ANL
1212
Increases in Powertrain Cost are Not the Only Cost Increases that Consumers May Need to Pay Chargers and cord and connector between vehicle and plus Charging Circuit Upgrades or Installation
– If you want faster charging, you will need an upgrade
– Level 1: Your standard circuit (110V, 20Amps, 1.1 KW)
– Level 2: Upgraded circuit (220V, 15 Amps, 3.3 kW)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Ch
arg
ing
Tim
e (H
ou
rs)
PHEV20 PHEV20 PHEV20 PHEV20PHEV30 PHEV30 PHEV30 PHEV30
110V, 15A 110V, 20A 220V, 20A 220V, 30A
n Midsize carn Crossover SUVn Traditional SUV
13
Examples for In-Home Charging and Public Charge Stations
13Source: Coulomb Technologies, 2010
14
How do We Use Vehicles?
PHEVs with an all-electric-range (AER) of 20 Miles could cover about 40% of daily Vehicles-Miles-Traveled (VMT) on electricity
PHEVs with a 30-Mile AER could cover about 55% of Daily VMTs
151515
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%0:
01-1
:00
1:01
-2:0
0
2:01
-3:0
0
3:01
-4:0
0
4:01
-5:0
0
5:01
-6:0
0
6:01
-7:0
0
7:01
-8:0
0
8:01
-9:0
0
9:01
-10:
00
10:0
1-11
:00
11:0
1-12
:00
12:0
1-13
:00
13:0
1-14
:00
14:0
1-15
:00
15:0
1-16
:00
16:0
1-17
:00
17:0
1-18
:00
18:0
1-19
:00
19:0
1-20
:00
20:0
1-21
:00
21:0
1-22
:00
22:0
1-23
:00
23:0
1-24
:00
Last Trip Ending Time
Sh
are
of
Sam
ple
d V
ehic
les
Share of vehicles used on weekdays
Share of vehicles used on weekend
The chart shows national data. Similar patterns can be observed for different regions in the country.
How do We Use Vehicles? (2)
Weekday Last Vehicle Trip Ending Time Shows a Sharp Peak At 5-6 PM, Totaling 15% of Vehicles
16
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
0:01
-1:0
0
1:01
-2:0
0
2:01
-3:0
0
3:01
-4:0
0
4:01
-5:0
0
5:01
-6:0
0
6:01
-7:0
0
7:01
-8:0
0
8:01
-9:0
0
9:01
-10:
00
10:0
1-11
:00
11:0
1-12
:00
12:0
1-13
:00
13:0
1-14
:00
14:0
1-15
:00
15:0
1-16
:00
16:0
1-17
:00
17:0
1-18
:00
18:0
1-19
:00
19:0
1-20
:00
20:0
1-21
:00
21:0
1-22
:00
22:0
1-23
:00
23:0
1-24
:00
Last Trip End Time
Sh
are
of
Ve
hic
les
Us
ed
Share of vehicles used on weekdays
Share of vehicles used on weekend
Last Vehicle Trip Ending Pattern of Trips Made During
July Through September
16
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
0:01
-1:0
0
1:01
-2:0
0
2:01
-3:0
0
3:01
-4:0
0
4:01
-5:0
0
5:01
-6:0
0
6:01
-7:0
0
7:01
-8:0
0
8:01
-9:0
0
9:01
-10:
00
10:0
1-11
:00
11:0
1-12
:00
12:0
1-13
:00
13:0
1-14
:00
14:0
1-15
:00
15:0
1-16
:00
16:0
1-17
:00
17:0
1-18
:00
18:0
1-19
:00
19:0
1-20
:00
20:0
1-21
:00
21:0
1-22
:00
22:0
1-23
:00
23:0
1-24
:00
Last Trip End Time
Sh
are
of
Ve
hic
les
Us
ed
Share of vehicles used on weekdays
Share of vehicles used on weekend
Last Vehicle Trip Ending Pattern of Trips Made During
January Through March
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
0:01
-1:0
0
1:01
-2:0
0
2:01
-3:0
0
3:01
-4:0
0
4:01
-5:0
0
5:01
-6:0
0
6:01
-7:0
0
7:01
-8:0
0
8:01
-9:0
0
9:01
-10:
00
10:0
1-11
:00
11:0
1-12
:00
12:0
1-13
:00
13:0
1-14
:00
14:0
1-15
:00
15:0
1-16
:00
16:0
1-17
:00
17:0
1-18
:00
18:0
1-19
:00
19:0
1-20
:00
20:0
1-21
:00
21:0
1-22
:00
22:0
1-23
:00
23:0
1-24
:00
Last Trip End Time
Sh
are
of
Ve
hic
les
Us
ed
Share of vehicles used on weekdays
Share of vehicles used on weekend
Last Vehicle Trip Ending Pattern of Trips Made During
April Through June
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
0:01
-1:0
0
1:01
-2:0
0
2:01
-3:0
0
3:01
-4:0
0
4:01
-5:0
0
5:01
-6:0
0
6:01
-7:0
0
7:01
-8:0
0
8:01
-9:0
0
9:01
-10:
00
10:0
1-11
:00
11:0
1-12
:00
12:0
1-13
:00
13:0
1-14
:00
14:0
1-15
:00
15:0
1-16
:00
16:0
1-17
:00
17:0
1-18
:00
18:0
1-19
:00
19:0
1-20
:00
20:0
1-21
:00
21:0
1-22
:00
22:0
1-23
:00
23:0
1-24
:00
Last Trip End Time
Sh
are
of
Ve
hic
les
Us
ed
Share of vehicles used on weekdays
Share of vehicles used on weekend
Last Vehicle Trip Ending Pattern of Trips Made During October Through December
Jan-Mar Apr-Jun
July-Sep Oct-Dec
How do We Use Vehicles? (3)
Some variation; the hottest months have the smallest peak hour share
171717
Worst Case: Charging Starts when People Arrive at their Homes; Will Show Grid Impacts
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0
30,000
60,000
90,000
120,000
150,000
180,000
0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168
PHEV
Load
[MW
]
Tota
l Loa
d [M
W]
WECC April 2020 Aggressive PHEV Case:Charge When Arriving @ Home
PHEV Aggressive Baseload Base + PHEV Aggressive
18
A Smart Vehicle-Grid Interface Configuration (Smart Grid, Smart Vehicle) will Reduce (Avoid?) System Impacts
V2G
19
Utilities see PHEV Smart-Charging as Critical for Success
Impact of PEVs on the 2020 Summer Load of Southern California Electric Power Grid– Peak power will increase
substantially without management
Optimal management requires smart grids and smart vehicles
Local circuits (blocks and neighborhoods) must be protected from overload– Transformers need cooling
periods at night
– Lifetime may be reduced
Consumer education and pricing policy will be key enablers
Source: SCE, 2009
202020
Best Case: Smart-Charging Delays Start of Battery Charging, and Perfectly Fills the Load Night-time Valley
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
0
30,000
60,000
90,000
120,000
150,000
180,000
0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168
PHEV
Load
[MW
]
Tota
l Loa
d [M
W]
WECC April 2020 Aggressive PHEV Case:Smart Charging
PHEV Aggressive SmartBaseloadBase + PHEV Aggressive Smart
21
V2G: Vehicles could be an Active Component of the Future Grid
Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) is a PHEV equipped with a communications interface– Control signals are sent from the grid operator to manage the flow of energy between the
vehicle and the grid
• Changing charging rate; reversing the flow of energy to feed back to the grid depending on a variety of factors including current grid load, current amount of renewable generation, state of charge of the vehicle, and real-time energy pricing
– Direct load control (similar to AC programs)
With true bi-directional flow capability, vehicles could provide ancillary grid services– Frequency control, regulation and spinning reserves
– Help penetration of intermittent renewable energy generation resources (solar and wind)
Another option is Vehicle-to-House (V2H)– Plug-in vehicles treated as power generation resource along with solar or wind power, and
controlled directly by an energy management system which controls the energy load at the home or business
Some issues– Automakers want dumb charging (KISS), utilities want smart charging
– Distribution system not built for bi-directional flows; will need infrastructure investments
– Communication infrastructure would have to be developed
– Effect of increased grid-controlled cycling on battery life time
2222
Argonne is Analyzing Grid Integration Issues of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles New analysis initiated for DOE Total of 4 case studies at different levels of
detail– Western Interconnect, Illinois, New York ISO, New
England ISO
Involves projecting PHEV penetration, electricity demand, charging scenarios, grid and infrastructure impacts, electricity prices, and emissions
Western InterconnectModel Representation
2323
Summary of Recent Studies on Impacts of PHEVs on Power Systems
Study Where? When? How Much PHEVs?
Hadley, 2008 (ORNL): Estimates marginal generation needed in individual regions. Estimates GHGs and criteria pollutants.
Thirteen 2007 NERC Regions
a) after 5 PMb) after 10 PM
25% on-road LDV share in 2030
Lemoine, 2008 (UC Berkeley): Estimates CAISO (CA) capability to meet PHEV electric demand.
California a) evening (1 charge/day)b) morning and evening
(2 charges/day)
Several penetration scenarios from 20% of annual new vehicle sales to 100% by PHEVs
Miller, 2007 (Atomic Energy of Canada Limited): Aggregate analysis of new nuclear electricity supply required.
Ontario Off-peak charging of PHEVs, balance of plant output replacing current coal.
One third of LDV energy demand is from electricity
EPRI & NRDC, 2007: Examines GHG impacts of PHEVs under three alternative futures: low, medium, and high carbon intensity
Thirteen 2007 NERC regions
Charging distributed throughout the day, but mainly off-peak
3 scenarios: 20%, 62%, and 80% share of new LDV sales by PHEVs in 2050
Kintner-Meyer, 2007 (PNNL) 12 modified NERC Regions
Valley filling of daily electric load curve
Estimates total available energy to charge PHEVs
23
24
The Starting Point is to Estimate the Future PHEV Market using Market Simulation Tools
25
Estimates of Number of PHEVs on the Road in 2020 by Region About 10% of Cars and SUVs In 2020 are assumed to be PHEVs Breakdown into AER 10, 20, 30, and 40 using average typical travel pattern (NHTS)
– PHEV10 – 39%; PHEV20 – 29%; PHEV30 – 19%; PHEV40 - 13%
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
California WECCExcludingCalifornia
Illinois New England New York
PH
EV
s i
n 2
02
0
16 kWh
12 kWh
8 kWh
4 kWh
Battery RatingUseable battery energy = 60% of rated energy
Further broken down into
Chicago and Rest
26
PHEV Load Profiles for Different Charging Behavior
2727
Load/Grid Impacts Vary due to Different Vehicle Adoption Rates and Different Urban/Rural Driving Patterns
Different impacts
28
New Capacity Requirements in 2020 due to PHEV Loads
System Peak
System Peak
System Peak
Increase Increase Increase(MW) (MW) (MW)
NY-ISO 38,738 685 370NGCC
400 685 181 GT 230 1,286 0 0
NE-ISO 31,292 759 513NGCC
400 +GT 230
759 169 GT 230 1,373 0 0
NGCC 5x400
Illinois 38,749 563 336NGCC
400563 178 GT 230 1,028 0 0
NGCC 2x400
5,935 0 0
System Peak Load (MW)
WECC 156,325 3,807 1,819 3,807 589
Power System
Unconstrained Charge Constrained Charge Smart ChargeMax.
PHEV Load (MW)
New Capacity Addition
(MW)
Max. PHEV Load (MW)
New Capacity Addition
(MW)
Max. PHEV Load (MW)
New Capacity Addition
(MW)
29
WECC Results: Additional Generation from Gas and Coal
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Unconstrained 3-Hour Shift Smart-Charge
Mar
gin
al G
ener
atio
n f
or
PH
EV
Lo
ad (
TW
h)
Renewables Biofuels Nuclear Oil Gas Coal
30
IL Results: Baseline Generation Mix in April and July
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
Nuclear Coal Gas
Gen
erat
ion
(G
Wh
)
April (Week 14)
July (Week 32)
31
PHEV Impact on Hourly Loads, Scenario A, Week 32 (July)
32
PHEV Impact on Hourly Loads, Scenario A, Week 14 (April)
33
PHEV Impact on Annual Load Duration Curve, Scenario A
34
PHEV-Induced Change in Generation Mix in April:Substantially More Coal, a Little More Gas
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Nuclear Coal Gas
Ch
an
ge
in
Ge
ner
ati
on
(G
Wh
)
Scenario A Scenario B
35
PHEV-Induced Change in Generation Mix in July:Less Additional Coal, More Gas
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Nuclear Coal Gas
Ch
an
ge
in G
ener
atio
n (
GW
h)
Scenario A Scenario B
36
Simulated Prices for Chicago Area – Week 32 (July): Different Price Impacts under Different Scenarios
37
Location is Important – Simulated Prices in July (Week 32)
Chicago Area Mid-Illinois
38
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
Petroleum Use (relative to GV)
GH
G E
mis
sio
ns
(re
lati
ve
to
GV
)
EV PHEV SI Gasoline PHEV CI Diesel PHEV SI Corn-E85 PHEV SI H. Biomass-E85 PHEV FC Distributed SMR-H2 PHEV FC Central H. Biomass-H2
Small marker for PHEV10Large marker for PHEV40
Baseline (GV)
Regular HEV (AER 0)
US Ave. Mix
WECC Mix
NY Mix
IL Mix
Renewable
color/pattern of marker = fuel/vehicle typeshape of marker = electricity generation mixsize of marker = AER rating
color/pattern of marker = fuel/vehicle typeshape of marker = electricity generation mixsize of marker = AER rating
Petroleum fuelsE85
H2
[VMTCD/VMTtotal]PHEV10 = 19%
[VMTCD/VMTtotal]PHEV40 = 51%
EV, US Ave mix
EV, NE Ave mix
EV, CA Ave mix
Summary of Petroleum Energy and GHG Effects of All Evaluated Options: Unconstrained Charging Scenario
3939
Summary
PHEVs can play a substantial role in reducing our petroleum consumption GHG emission reductions related to PHEV depend heavily on the energy/power mix,
the vehicle configuration, and the choice of technology Smart-infrastructure is critical to manage the additional load on the grid PHEVs/EVs may facilitate the use of large penetration of variable, renewable
resources Keep it simple for the consumer
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Aver
age
Hou
rly
Real
-Tim
e Pr
ice
[$/M
Wh]
Aver
age
Hou
rly
Win
d Fr
actio
n
Average Hourly Wind Profiles for 4 Locations in Illinoisand 2008 Real-Time Prices in IL Hub
IL Wind 01 IL Wind 02IL Wind 03 IL Wind 04Real-Time Price IL
Chevy Volt Phone App