Post on 25-May-2015
North, Third and York
Alley Redevelopment
North, Third and York
Key Assumptions
No change in the current C-2 zoning recommended
Existing property owners to have semi-exclusive use of a minimum of 50% of municipal parking spaces within their individual taking areas
Taking will be in fee
Market Shows
FAR is virtually meaningless in suburban downtown districts with respect to existing uses
Commercial land values for the subject lie between $18 and $25 per SF
General commercial building values lie between $60 and $90 per SF with medical office slightly higher ($100 to $120)
Zoning Should Remain C-2
Parking requirements reduce developable footprint
Most subject properties (with two exceptions) are currently underparked
Zoning can be adjusted when redevelopment of block is eminent
FAR is NOT the Issue
None of the properties are built to the maximum FAR currently
None of the comparables are developed to their maximum FAR currently
More important than FAR is the available developable footprint
FARs Compared
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
No. 1
8
No. 1
9
No. 2
0
No. 2
1
No. 2
2
No. 2
5
No. 2
6
No. 2
7
Property
FAR Permitted FAR
Actual FAR
Comparable FARs Compared
0 1 2 3 4
FAR
110 Cottage Hill Ave.
332 N. York
401 N. York
581-91 S. York
851 N. Addison
172-76 N. Addison
122-24 S. York
120-22 N. York
108 N. York
Com
para
ble
Pro
pert
y
FAR as Built
Allowable FAR
Available Footprint Calculation
ELMHURSTRestaurant General Retail Office Use
Site Area (for ex.) 12,119 12,119 12,119 1 Prkg Sp per SF of Bldg. 100 250 250SF per Parking Space 400 400 400Space Needed: 500 650 650Building Footprint Ratio: 24.24 18.64 18.64 Building Footprint: 2,424 4,661 4,661
Available Footprints Compared
-2,0004,0006,0008,000
10,00012,00014,000
SF
No. 18
No. 19
No. 20
No. 21
No. 22
No. 25
No. 26
No. 27
Property
Available Footprint
Actual Bldg. SF
Footprint x 2
The Taking
Taking is calculated on actual/potential parking spaces as opposed to land
In current downtown suburban markets, value is approximately $25,000 per space
Typical taking is 50’ x 60’, which can accommodate 7.5 spaces (at 400 SF each)
Take equals $187,500, or $62.50/SF
After Take - Properties Benefit
Assume 50% of new parking within take area dedicated for owners’ use
With take area and existing alley, between 9.5 and 11 new spaces can be created, or 4.75 to 5.5 spaces (50%) for property owner
Total space benefit, then, is between $118,750 and $135,714
Properties Benefit (2)
In addition to availability of more parking than they current enjoy, properties will benefit by loss of operating expenses and taxes for take area
Real estate taxes and operating expenses for surface parking lots estimated at approximately $1.26/SF, combined
Standard Compensation - High
NET LOSS TO PROPERTY OWNER
Lost Spaces 187,500$ Plus Maint. Of Parking by Municipality (3,780)$ Plus Return of Use to Spaces (118,750)$
Total Loss 64,970$ or $/SF of land area 21.66$
Standard Compensation - Low
NET LOSS TO PROPERTY OWNER Lost Spaces 187,500$ Plus Maint. Of Parking by Municipality (3,780)$ Plus Return of Use to Spaces (135,714)$
Total Loss 48,006$ or $/SF of land area 16.00$
Bottom Line
Total compensation per property owner in the range of $48,000 to $65,000
Increase overall available parking in the district, which benefits all users
Virtually no negative impact on property owners relative to density
Taking in Fee
A leasehold or easement taking would be unnecessarily complex
FARs and maximum allowable density is not an issue for existing facilities
Rezoning could be implemented after parking redevelopment to draw and benefit redevelopment in the block
Integra Realty Consultants, USA
Gary K. DeClark, MAI, CRE
Nancy S. Myers, Sr. Analyst