Post on 31-Dec-2015
description
Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture
EIA appeals EU legislation and jurisprudence
Jan Veeken
Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture
2
Contents
-Place of Directives in national legislation-Types of legal questions-Steps towards the European Court of Justice-Applicants at the European Court of Justice-Jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice
Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture
3
Place of Directives in national legislation
EIA Directives obligatorily transposed in national legislation, but:
Member States can specify…
Consequence: national differences in the obligation to follow EIA, ‘legal risks’
Therefore:-EU and national legislation have to be placed side by side-In case of doubt or inconsistencies EU Directives have priority-Jurisprudence relating to the Directives develops at the European Court of Justice, not by national courts
Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture
4
Types of legal questions
European court cases are about:-transposing Directives timely-transposing Directives correctly-obligation for following EIA in specific cases
The European court will judge:-as a court in the first instance (directly)-answering pre-judicial questions (interpretation questions) from national judges
Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture
5
Steps towards the European Court of JusticeWhen the Court judges as a court in first instance, previous steps in the procedure can be:
-appeal to the competent authority
-appeal at a regional court of justice
-appeal at a higher, national court of justice
Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture
6
Applicants at the European Court of Justice
-European Commission-Member States, authorities-National judges
Private entities cannot appeal to the European Court
Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture
7
Register of Complaints
•Everybody can complain and is getting a letter back (if complaint is concrete and verification is possible)•Not a formal procedure but getting formalized•Complaints: 50% nature, 25% evaluation of impacts, 10% waste and 10% air and water•After complaint some research, not inspection, by EU, informing involved country•Now mainly looking to the principles of directives and horizontal issues
Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture
8
Jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice
Transposing Directives timely:
-The obligation for EIA does not depend on transposing in national legislation of a Member State
Case: Bund Naturschutz against Freistaat Bayern - Germany
Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture
9
Jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice
Transposing Directives correctly:
-Annex I of Council Directive 85/337/EEC has to be transposed in full into national law
-Not only size and capacity provide the necessity of an EIA-procedure, but also the location of a project
Cases: European Commission against Belgium, European Commission against Ireland
Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture
10
Jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice
Transposing Directives correctly:
-Projects in Annex II of CD 85/337/EEC have to be broadly interpreted
-For projects in Annex II a preliminary environmental assessment is obligatory before excluding a project from the EIA procedure
Cases: Kraaijeveld against Provincie Zuid Holland - Netherlands, World Wildlife Fund against Autonome Provinz Bozen - Italy
Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture
11
Jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice
Scope:
-Council Directive 85/337/EEC can extend over projects already permitted and/or started before the commencement of the Directive but not yet finished and/or continuous
-CD 85/337/EEC also extends over projects that are cut in parts and phased in the future
Cases: Wells against the Secretary of State for Transport – UK, European Commission against Spain
Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture
12
Newest Jurisprudence
•Verdict of September 16th 2004•Railway Valencia-Tarrogona (Spain)•(complain of may 1999, appeal of 7 june 2001)•Not considered as an Annex II activity (pre-assessment procedure) by Spain•Verdict by the Court: should follow the pre-assessment procedure