Post on 19-Jan-2016
description
Ecosystem Water Use: A Concept Linking Ecosystem Water Use: A Concept Linking Water and Carbon FluxesWater and Carbon Fluxes
Jiquan Chen
Landscape Ecology & Ecosystem Science (LEES) LabUniversity of Toledo
Feb. 21, 2005
Flux TowersFlux Towers
NEENEEcc & NEE & NEEH2OH2O
Average diurnal fluxes of CO2 and H2O in Jul., Aug., and Sept. in 1999 in a 20 and a 500 year-old Douglas-fir forest (WA). Only data from good fetch (200-310o) directions were used. Negative and positive values indicate uptake and loss, respectively. Chen et al. 2002
Measurement Year 1998 1999
Stand 40YR 450YR 20YR 450YR
Carbon(g C.m-2.day-1)
July -4.27 1.39 -0.56 -0.79
August -2.69 -0.79 -0.01 -1.10
September
-1.21 0.93 -0.33 -1.97
Overall -2.76 0.51 -0.30 -1.26
Water (mm.day-1)
July 1.15 0.87 1.67 2.09
August 1.20 1.43 1.36 2.98
September
0.87 1.58 1.02 1.74
Overall 1.15 1.29 1.35 2.30
Average daily net exchange of carbon and water in Jul., Aug., and Sept. of 1998 and 1999 at three Douglas-fir forests of different ages (20, 40, and 450 year-old) in S. WA.
Chen et al. 2002
WUE is traditionally used as the amount of photosynthetic product produced per unit water evaporated, but a number of other definitions have been given to this term as well, depending on the purposes of the experiment. In this study, we define WUEe as the ratio of net
ecosystem exchange of carbon (Fc) to evapotranspiration (ETor FH2O):
W U E e
FF
C
H O
2
Ecosystem Water Use Efficiency (WUEe) at Four Measuring Periods of 3 Douglas-fir Stands
OG98 40Y98 OG99 20Y990
2
4
6
8
WU
E (
mg.
g-1)
Dry year Wet year
•WUEe of the old-growth forest was significantly greater in the drier summer of 1998 (2.7 mg.g-1) than in 1999 (1.0 mg.g-1).
•WUEe of the young stand was significantly lower than that of old-growth forest.
ConclusionsConclusions
OG98 40Y98 OG99 20Y990
2
4
6
8
WU E
(mg.
g-1
)
Dry year Wet year
Scanlon and Albertson 2004
•How does WUEe change with stand age (succession)?
•How does WUEe vary among ecosystems (disturbance)?
A landscape is composed of a variety of ecosystems differing in type, age, size, shape, and spatial arrangement. Two questions are:
MethodsMethods
A combination of direct measurements, remote A combination of direct measurements, remote
sensing images, and ecosystem models.sensing images, and ecosystem models.
Pine Barrens Mature red pine Mature hardwood
Young red pineYoung red pine
Mature red pineMature red pine
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
May June July Aug. Sept. Oct.
Cum
ula
tive E
T, M
g m
-2
Cumulative seasonal evaportranspiration (ET) at five ecosystemsCumulative seasonal evaportranspiration (ET) at five ecosystems
MRP
YRP
PB
MHW
CC
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
MHW MRP PB CC YMP
May
June
July
August
September
October
W UE
, mg
CO
2 g-1
H2
O
WUEe of Five Ecosystems in the CNF of Northern WI
R
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
May June July Aug. Sept. Oct.
WU
E, m
g C
g
-1 H
2 O .
WUEe among 5 ecosystems
Water use efficiency and stand ageWater use efficiency and stand age
0
1
2
3
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Age, years
WU
EE, u
g C
g -1 H
2 O
W U EG P P
Tr
[ ]1
At leaf level, instantaneous water use efficiency is defined as
N E E
E Tc [ ]2
In this paper, we defined ecosystem water use, ,
W U EN E E
E T
G P P R R
E Tec a h
G P P
E T
R
E T
R
E Ta h
A revisit of WUEA revisit of WUEee concept: concept:
Water use efficiency by RS community
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Net Carbon Exchange
(g C m-2 d-1)
Het
erot
rop
hic
Res
pir
atio
n
(g C
m-2
d-1
)
YHW
IHW
MHW
NCE Influence on Rh: Hardwoods
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Net Carbon Exchange
Het
erot
rop
hic
Res
pir
atio
n
YRP
IRP
MRP
NCE Influence on Rh: Red Pine
E TG P P
W U E
[ ]4
W U E
R
G P P
R
G P Pa h1 [5]
W U E
N P P
G P P
R
G P Ph [ ]7
W U E
N P P
G P P
R
G P PW U E
N E E
G P Ph [ ]6
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
YHW IHW MHW YRP IRP MRP
NP
P/G
EP
There seems a strong correlation with stand age and ecosystem type!
What’s next?What’s next?
Is (RIs (Raa/ET) varying with age & disturbance?/ET) varying with age & disturbance?
WUEWUEee in non-growing season equals to (R in non-growing season equals to (Raa/E)!/E)! How is Ra regulated by biomass (LAI), How is Ra regulated by biomass (LAI),
temperature, and moisture?temperature, and moisture? How does (NPP*WUE/GPP) vary with time How does (NPP*WUE/GPP) vary with time
scale (i.e., hours-years)?scale (i.e., hours-years)? How does (NPP*WUE/GPP) change with How does (NPP*WUE/GPP) change with
sucession and disturbance?sucession and disturbance?
-3
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
(5-6) (12-14) (30-32) (65-71)
Regenerating clearcut Old forest
Gro
win
g S
easo
n N
EE
(Mg
C h
a-1
)
Age of Ecosystem (years)
Recent clearcut
Mature forest
Summary of growing season NEE for comparable pine ecosystems of various age classes. Data is from Baldocchi et al. 1997, Joiner et al. 1999, Pypker & Fredeen 2002, Griffis et al. 2003). Euskirchen et al. (in revision)
0
2
4
6
-2
-4
Low
High
Climate-dominantResistance to disturbance
Climate-controlSusceptible to disturbance
Chronological Age
NE
P
Legacy effect
Hypothesized carbon flux of forest ecosystems after a disturbance
Questions?Questions?
http://research.eeescience.utoledo.edu/lees/
Support provided by the National Science Foundation, Southern Global Change Program, and WESTGEC of DOE