Post on 25-Aug-2020
2009 9 ( )
(http://www.edb.gov.hk)
213
13 1319
( )
ccdopshe@edb.gov.hk
I-III
1 1-18
2 19
2.1 20-37
2.2 38-52
2.3 53-74
3 75
3.1 76-87
3.2 88-99
4 100-120
5 121-131
6 132-143
1. i-ii
2. iii
3. iv
• I
1.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
2.
( ) 18 13-15
3. ( 1 4 6)
( )
4.
1 5
2 9
3 2
4 4
5 2
6 4
• II
5. ( )
6. ( 2006 )
2009 ( 2011 )
7. ( 1 )
8. Excel
(http //www.edb.gov.hk/index.aspx?langno=2&nodeid=3226)
9.
(http //www.edb.gov.hk/index.aspx?langno=2&nodeid=3226)
10.
11.
12.
• III
13.
14.
• 6
• 1
1
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
(
)
160-170
5
• 2
1
.
1.
2.
3.
. 25
.
. Street of London
.
/ /( )
/
1. *
? ?
4 *
( 4 )
2. S t r e e t o f
London
(3 )
7
1 3
Ralph McTell
Street of
London
3. 2 3 5
4.
**
9
** 1
• 3
.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
• 4
.
• 5
.
1. EDWARD A. GARGAN, 1996, In Rich Hong Kong, Cages as Homes for the Poor
(http //www.nytimes.com/specials/hongkong/archive/960714in-rich-hong.html)
2. Mankiw, N. Gregory, Principles of Economics, 4ed. Ch. 1, P. 5 & Ch. 20, P.439-442.
3.
(http //www.hku.hk/socsc/sssp/2005/album/Cage%20Homes/index.html)
4. Streets of London Ralph McTell
Streets of London http //www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmKMQ19bZ8
http //www.pinkart.com.hk/music/esong/streets_of_London.htm
http //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streets_of_London
5. Stephanie Wong, Hong Kong’s cage homes reveal wealth gap.
(http //news.sawf.org/Lifestyle/39233.aspx)
• 6
2 -
.
1.
2.
3.
. 35
.
1.
2.
. ( )
( )
.
/ /( )
/
1.
A B *
3
* 2. 5
3.
(A 1 B
2)
6
4. 5
5. 7
6. 9
• 7
1. 2006 10
(i) 8,000 1996 16.4% 2006
21.2%
(ii) 4 15% 17%
2. M
2007 4 13
.
1
2
1. 703 10
(1)
- (88 )
- 84
- 79
(2)
- (44%)
- (40%)
- (40%)
2.
2007 7 9
• 8
(A 1-2 B 3-4)
1. ?
/
2. ?
3. ? ?
4. ? ?
• 9
3
.
1.
2.
. 35
.
.
( 2007 5 2 10 17 )
.
/ /( )
/
1. 2
2007 5 2
10 172. 5
3.
(A 1 B
2)
5
4. 5
5. (
)
(1-2 )
3
2
6. 10
7. 5
• 10
.
1
1. 2006
2. 2006 28,436 27,641
3.
(i) (ii)
(iii)
4.
.
.
5.
. 7,300
.
.
6.
2007 5 2
• 11
2
1 A
1. ? ?
2 B
2. ? ?
1.
75%
40%
15%
10%
50% 43%
2. 1
2007 10 17
• 12
4
.
1.
2.
. 35
.
1.
2.
.
.
/ /( )
/
1. 2
*
2007 6
1 4
;
*
2002 11
5
2
2.
(
)
5
3. (
1 A 2 B
)
6
4. 5
5. 12
6. 5
• 13
.
.
2000 470
2 3
2001-02 250 75%
2002 11 100
2006-07 200 134 (68%)
70 98
100 102
1. 2002
11 5 (http //www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/200211/05/1105193.htm)
2. 2007 6 14
• 14
1. (A )
100
a.
100
( )
b.
2. (B )
100
a.
b.
a.
b.
• 15
5
.
1.
2.
. 30-40 ( )
.
.
.
.
• 16
.
1.
a. ;
b. ;
c. ( )
d.
e.
2.
a. ;
b. ( );
c.
6 ;
d. ;
e. 2
• 17
1.
a.
b.
c.
d.
2.
( )
a.
b.
c.
d.
• 18
.
2003 4 1
4 1
( )
4 1
( )
44 100
44 60
10
1. ?
2. ?
• 19
2
1.
2.
a. /
b.
c.
3.
4.
5. / ( )
6.
155-185
• 20
2.1 /
1.
2.
3. ( )
1.
2.
55-70
3
• 21
2.1 1
.
. 20
.
.
/ /( )
/
1.
(
1)
4
1
2. 3
3.
(
2)
5 2
4. 3
5. 5
• 22
.
1
• 23
2
500,000
480,000
5,000,000
250,000
10,000
360,000
100,000
300,000
( )
( )
• 24
2.1 2
.
. 35
. 1-3
.
/ /( )
/
1.
(
1)
4
1
2. 3
2007
2 0 0 6
3.
20%
1 5 1
4. 1971 2006
(
2)
5 2
5.
2
5
E x c e l
*
2
6.
(
3)
3 3
• 25
7.
3
5 3
8.
4
5
4
.
(2007) (2006)*
20%3.4 2.9
20% 8.8 7.5
20% 14.7 12.5
20% 22.8 20.1
20%50.3 57
* 2006
( 14)
1. Income, Earnings, and Poverty Data From the 2007 American Community Survey (P.10) (U.S. Census Bureau, 2008) (http //www.census.gov/prod/2008pubs/acs-09.pdf )2. 2006 ( 14) (http://www.bycensus2006.gov.hk/FileManager/EN/Content_962/06bc_hhinc.pdf)
1
• 26
2
(1971-2006)
( )
1971 1981 1991 2001 2006
20% 6.2 4.6 4.3 3.2 2.9
20% 10.2 9.8 9 7.8 7.5
20% 14.3 14.3 13.5 12.6 12.5
20% 20 20.9 20.4 19.9 20.1
20% 49.3 50.4 52.8 56.5 57
(1971-2006)
• 27
3
20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
5 10 15 25 45
5 12 15 23 45
5 8 16 26 45
( 40%)
( 40%)
• 28
.
1
(%) (%)
20% 5 20% 6
20% 8 20% 10
20% 15 20% 18
20% 22 20% 24
20% 50 20% 42
a.
50% 42%
b. ( ) ? ?
(50/5=10)
42/6=7
( 40%)
• 29
2
a. (20%)
b. ( )
(1971-2001)
( )
1971 1981 1991 2001
( ) 2.3 1.4 1.3 0.9
3.9 3.2 3.0 2.3
5.1 4.4 4.0 3.4
5.1 5.4 5.0 4.4
7.0 6.5 6.1 5.6
7.3 7.8 7.4 7.0
9.0 9.4 9.0 8.8
11.0 11.5 11.4 11.1
14.7 15.2 15.5 15.3
( ) 34.6 35.2 37.3 41.2
100 100 100 100
• 30
2
(a) (1971-2001)
( ) 1971 1981 1991 2001
20% 6.2 4.6 4.3 3.2
20% 10.2 9.8 9.0 7.8
20% 14.3 14.3 13.5 12.6
20% 20.0 20.9 20.4 19.9
20% 49.3 50.4 52.8 56.5
100 100 100 100
(b)
( 20%) 1971 2001
( 20%)
• 31
3
(20%)
20% 20%
0.58(2003)* 2.6 62.1 1
0.326(2000) 7.2 39.9 5**
0.283(2000) 8.5 36.9 8
0.343(2002) 8.4 43.3 6**
0.525(2001)*** 3.2 56.5 2
0.362(1997) 6.4 43.8 4
0.316(1998) 7.9 37.5 7
0.399(2002) 6.1 46.6 3 2006
(http //devdata.worldbank.org/wdi2006/contents/Table2_8.htm)
*
**
*** 2006
a. 20% 20% (
)
b.
(a) ? ?
( ) ( )
c.
• 32
4
2007 2 27% 2006 29.5% 1990
69% 90%
Special Focus Agriculture for Development in East Asia - Lessons from the World Development Report 2008 (East Asia Update, November 2007)(http //web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/EASTASIAPACIFICEXT/EXTEAPHALFYEARLYUPDATE/0,,contentMDK 21549659~pagePK 64168445~piPK 64168309~theSitePK 550226,00.html)
a.
b. ( )
• 33
2.1 3
( )
.
. 15
. 1
.
/ /( )
/
1.
( 1)
5
1
2. 5
3. 1 2 5
• 34
.
1
/
( 20%) (
20%)
• 35
.
1 ( )
• 36
2
1. 1990 2000
1990 2000
(%) (%)
20% 5 3
20% 9 8
20% 15 15
20% 21 22
20% 50 52
a.
b.
2. 1995 2005
1995 2005
( ) (%) (%)
20% 4 4
20% 10 11
20% 15 16
20% 22 20
20% 49 49
a.
b.
( )
( )
( )
3.
• 37
.
1. Frank A. Cowell (1995), Handbook in Economics, measuring inequality. LSE.
2. Hilde Bojer (2003), Distributional Justice, theory and measurement. Routledge. Chapters 9 and 11.
3. Mankiw, N. Gregory (2007), Principles of Microeconomics, 4th ed., International ed., Thomson,
South-Western. Chapters 1, 2, 7, 12, 18, 19, 20.
4. Parkin, Michael (2005), Economics , 7th ed., International Edition, Pearson, Addison Wesley.
Chapters 5, 6, 17 and 18.
5. 2006
• 38
1.
2.
3.
4.
( )
1.
2.
40-45
3
2.2
• 39
2.2 1
.
. 12
. ( 1 2)
.
/ /( )
/
1.
(
1)
1
2. 2
Excel
1
2
(
20%
)
3. 1
( )
1
1
2
4. 1
5. 2
2
2
2
6. 2 1
7. 2
8. 1 1
• 40
.
1
(%) (%) (%) (%)
20% 20 20 20 20
20% 20 40 20 40
20% 20 60 20 60
20% 20 80 20 80
20% 20 100 20 100
1 ( )
15% 15%
48% 48%
90% 90%
• 41
2
( 20% )
(%) (%) (%) (%)
20% 20 20 0 0
20% 20 40 0 0
20% 20 60 0 0
20% 20 80 0 0
20% 20 100 100 100
2 ( )
15 048 0
90** 50
** 20%
• 42
• 43
.
1
$5,000
(20%)
a.
I.
II.
b.
(%) (%)
(%) (%)20% 20 20 0 0
20% 20 40 0 0
20% 20 60 0 0
20% 20 80 0 0
20% 20 100 100 100
• 44
2.2 2
.
. 25
. 1 2
.
/ /( )
/
1.
?
3 1
Excel
1
2. 1 3
3. 1 4 1
4.
1
3
5. 2
4
5
6. 5
7.
2
2
• 45
.
1
B M G
(B M G )
1 (B M G)
B (2003) M (1997) G (2000)
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)20% 3 3 4 4 8 8
20% 6 9 8 12 14 22
20% 11 20 13 25 18 40
20% 18 38 21 46 23 63
20% 62 100 54 100 37 100
2006
• 46
2
1
. $2,000
. 10%
. $2,000
. $1,000
1
10% 2000
1000
($) *(%) ($) *(%) ($) *(%) ($) *(%) ($) *(%)
20%2 000 3 4 000 7 2 200 3 4 000 6 1 000 2
20%7 000 15 7 000 20 7 700 15 9 000 19 6 000 13
20%10 000 32 10 000 37 11 000 32 12 000 36 9 000 29
20%16 000 58 16 000 62 17 600 58 18 000 61 15 000 56
20%25 000 100 23 000 100 27 500 100 27 000 100 24 000 100
60 000 60 000 66 000 70 000 55 000
* (%)
• 47
2
.
. 10%
.
$2,000
.
$1,000
• 48
.
1
1971 2001
1.
2. 1971 2001
2001
(1971-2001)
(%) 1971 (%) 200120% 6.2 3.2
20% 16.4 11
20% 30.7 23.6
20% 50.7 43.5
20% 100 100
( Excel )
• 49
2
/
a.
b. $500
c. 5%
d. $1,000
e. $500
c d e
• 50
2.2 3
( )
.
. 10
. ( 1)
.
/ /( )
/
1.
( 1)
4
1
E x c e l
2. 2
3. 2
4.
1
2
• 51
.
1
(2000 )
(2000) (2000)
(%) (%) (%) (%)20% 4 4 3 3
20% 8 12 7 10
20% 13 25 15 25
20% 21 46 23 48
20% 54 100 52 100
Excel
• 52
. ( )
• 53
1.
2.
3.
4. *
(* )
1.
2.
60-65
3
2.3
• 54
2.3 1
.
. 20
.
( 1)
( 2)
( 3)
.
/ /( )
/
1. 1 3 E x c e l
1
2.
( 2)
5 2
3.
(L2,L3)
(
1)
L2
L3
4
4. (
)
3
• 55
5. 2
6.
3
1 2 3 3
1
2
.
(
)
1. Excel ( ) (
)
2.
( )
3. (
)
1991 /
// 20%* 40% 60% 80% 100%
(H) 0.2765 7.68** 21.36 40.32 65.16 100 A(P) 0.362 6.44 17.84 32.69 63.94 100 A
(H) 0.3563 6.14 18.11 35.29 59.58 100 A
(P) 0.32 8.71 21.20 37.47 58.91 100 B(P) 0.3049 7.37 20.61 38.13 61.34 100 B(H) 0.3794 4.5 15.2 31.8 55.9 100 B
(H) ; (P)
* 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
** 7.68 20% 1991 7.68% 21.36
40% 1991 21.36%
Klaus W. Deininger and Lyn Squire (1996) Measuring Income Inequality Database(http //go.worldbank.org/UVPO9KSJJ0)
1
• 56
A
B
• 57
2
1.
2.
3. =A /A+B (A
B )
4.
5. LE (
)
6. LC1 (
0 1 1 )
(LC1)
A1+B =50
B =2 x 10/2=10
A1 =A1+B -B
=50-10
=40
=40/50=0.8
(LE)
A(A1) 0
A1+B =50
=0/50=0
1
• 58
1. (A B)
2. A LC2
3. B LC3
4.
5. ( )
(
A )
A
YA2
(%)
(%)
LC2,
A2 = 2x10/2=10( ),
A2+ B = 50,
= 10/50=0.2
Y
1
• 59
B(%
)
(%)
LC3
A3 (5x10/2)=25
A3+B =50
=25/50=0.5
1
• 60
3(%
)
(%)
1.
2. (0-1)
3. /
• 61
.
1
(%)
(%)
a. A A B
b. A
c. B = A /( )
d. A
e. B 1
• 62
2
1981 2006 ?
(1 3 )
1 (1981-2006)
1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006
0.451 0.453 0.467 0.518 0.525 0.533
• 63
2.3 2
.
. 30
.
( 1)
1980-2008
(
2)
.
/ /( )
/
1.
1
5 1
2. 3
3. 1
2
2
2
4. 2
3
1 2 5
5. 15 2
• 64
1
.
1 GDP
GDP (PPP) (2007)
( )*
45,800 0.45 2007
42,000 0.53 2007
37,300 0.31 2006
36,000 0.26 2005
35,000 0.34 2005
33,500 0.38 2002
25,000 0.35 2006
9,700 0.65 2005
5,400 0.47 2007
3,200 0.46 2006
2,600 0.37 2004
* CIA (Gini Index) 100
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (https //www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2004rank.html)
(https //www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fi elds/2172.html)
1. 1
2.
3. 2
( ) ( )
( )
• 65
2
1
(1980-2008)
①
②
③
④ ( )
①
②
③
④
017
(http //www.censtatd.gov.hk/showtableexcel2.jsp?tableID=017&charsetID=2)
2
1981 2006
1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006
0.451 0.453 0.476 0.518 0.525 0.533
(1992), (2002) (2006)
1.
• 66
2. 2 1
1
3
( )
( ) (http //www.cpu.gov.hk/tc/documents/csd/csd_sc_summary_6c.pdf)
4
(1982-2008)
①
②
③
④
①②
③
④
• 67
021 ( )
(http //www.censtatd.gov.hk/showtableexcel2.jsp?tableID=021&charsetID=2)
3. 3
4
(
)
( )
(http //www.cpu.gov.hk/tc/documents/csd/csd_sc_summary_6c.pdf)
• 68
2.3 3
.
. 10-15 ( )
. ( 1)
.
/ /( )
/
1. 2
*
2. 1 1
2
1
5
3. 0/5*
4.
1
3
*
• 69
.
A 1( ) B
2( )
1
1 20
1.
40,000
2.
40,000
80,000
2
1. ( )
10,000
2. ( )
10,000
3. ( )
20,000
4. ( )
20,000
5. ( )
20,000
80,000
0.15
2007
1
• 70
2
(2006)
http //www.eabfu.gov.hk/doc/income.pdf
.
1
2006 /
2007
900-1000
2007 4 13 2007 12 10
a. ?
b. ( ) ?
c. (
) ?
/ ( )
• 71
( )
d. ?
e. 2001 0.525 2006
? 2001-2006
1996 2001 2006
1996 2001 2006
0.518 0.525 0.533
( )0.466 0.470 0.475
2006 ( 14)
• 72
1
(%)
(%)
a. 0 1
b. 1 /
c. 0 /
d. A /
A 0 /
• 73
2
?
3
1
1 A B
A 0.5 2001
B 0.52 1996
1 A B
(i) (ii) 1 (iii) 1
A
• 74
4
? 1 3
1996 2001 2006
0.518 0.525 0.533
2006
;
;
( )
1. Measuring Income Inequality Database Klaus W. Deininger & Lyn Squire (1996)
2. (2006)
3. (2004)
4.
5.
http //www.cpu.gov.hk/tc/documents/csd/csd_sc_summary_6c.pdf
6. http //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gini_coeffi cient
7. 2006
• 75
3
1.
2. /
3.
4.
5. ( )
6.
160
2
• 76
3.1
.
/
.
.
1. A D
E H
2. A3/A4
3.
. 80
.
/ /( )
/
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
15
5. *
6.
7.
4.
5.
20
• 77
8.
?
6.
7.
8.
9.
20
+
15
9. 10. 10
*
.
• 78
A
/ /
( )
(100,000-120,000 )
1
• 79
B
( 5 8 )
/ /
( )
(25,000-35,000 )
2
• 80
C
/
( )
/ /
( )
(8,000-12,000 )
3
• 81
D
( )
/ /
( )
(4,850 )
4
• 82
E
( + LCCI 1 2 )
/ /
( )
(5,800-9,000 )
3
• 83
F
( 20 )
/ /
( )
(83,000 )
2
• 84
G
/ /
( )
(227,000 )
1
• 85
H
( )
/ /
( )
(4,800 )
4
• 86
.
1
15,000
9,000
(a)
(b) ?
(c) ?
• 87
2
650,000
187,000 5,000,000
1,000,000
• 88
3.2
.
( )
.
1.
2.
3.
4.
.
1.
2. A4/A3
. 80
.
/ /( )
/
1.
2.
/
3.
1.
2.
3.
10
+
20
• 89
4.
5.
4.
5.
10
6.
7.
6.
7.
10
+
8
8. 15
9. 8. 7
• 90
.
• 91
A
3
1.
2.
• 92
B
1984
20
1.
2.
• 93
C
23 14,685
1.
2.
• 94
D
23
1.
2.
• 95
E
4
1.
2.
• 96
F
100 1
1.
2.
• 97
G
(60 )
1.
2.
• 98
H
500
1.
2.
• 99
.
1
1. ( )
2. / / ? ?
3. ? ?
2
1. 2.
( / )
• 100
4
1.
2. ( )
3.
4.
110-130
• 101
1
.
1.
2. ( )
3.
. 35
.
.
.
/ /( )
/
1. 2
*
( )
2. 3
3. 5
4. 8
5. 5
6.
*
12
• 102
.
1. 82
2.
3.
4.
5.
2007 6 17
1. ?
( )
2. ?
?
/
3.
• 103
.
1. Rich irony as the coffers overflow while poverty grows
2007 3 3 ( 1- 1)
(http //www.hkcss.org.hk/documents/CE_20070303_scmp.pdf)
2. 2003 1 22
( 1- 2)
(http //www.fhb.gov.hk/en/press_and_publications/speech/shwf/2003/sp030122.htm)
3. 2007 6 16
4. Principles of Microeconomics (4th ed.) Chapter 20 Mankiw, N. Gregory
• 104
1
1
2007-2008
1,400
1,600
551 2006
! 6,000 700,000
Rich irony as the coffers overfl ow while poverty grows2007 3 3
http //www.hkcss.org.hk/documents/CE_20070303_scmp.pdf
• 105
2
2003 1 22
1.
2.
3.
4.
• 106
2
.
. 25
.
.
.
/ /( )
/
1.
*
/ 2
*
2. 1 3
3.
10
4. 5
5. 5
• 107
.
* 2
**
/ /
( )
A.
1.
96%
2.
a.
b. 50%
c.
d. 50% 75%
3.
70 5 250
B.
1.
a.
b. 10%
c. 18% 25%
2.
60% ( 1,810 3,150 )
3.
50% 6
C.
1. ( )
0 5
2. ( )
3.
a. /
b.
• 108
4. ( )
a. 65 69 1,000
b. 70 1,000 ( )
D.
1. 3-5( 48,000 )
2. 6-14
a.
b.
c.
3. 15-18
( )
a.
b.
4. 18-24
5. 18-65
E.
1. 15-24
a. (15 19 )
b. (15 24 )
c. (15 )
2. 24-60
a.
b. (40 )
c. ( )
d.
e.
f.
3.
.
• 109
3
.
1.
2.
3.
. 40-50 ( )
.
1.
2.
.
.
/ /( )
/
1.
#
( ) 2 #
(A-D)
##
* *
2.
## **
3
3. 5
4. 3-5
10
5. 10
6. 10
• 110
.
1.
2.
/
3. ( 3 5 )( 10
)
• 111
.
A
3 90
3 500
1997 2
60 2003
3
3
2007 4 7
1. a.
b. ? ?
2. 2 ( )
• 112
B
1
19 05 1
8000
2007 2 19
1. a.
b.
2. 2 ( )
• 113
C
55
15 1970 18
2005 4,000 2006 3,800
2005 6,000
1. 2006 12 18
2. 2006 4 29
1. a.
b. 50 (
)
2. 2 ( ) (
)
• 114
D
22 4,000
2006 17 20
2007 10 6
1. a.
b.
( 20 )
2. 2 ( )
• 115
4 /
.
. 10-20
.
.
.
/ /( )
/
1. 2 *
2. 2
3. 6
4. * 8
5. * 2
• 116
.
2005 1
2005 1
1. ? ?
2.
3. 2
• 117
2
A.
1.
http //www.hcv.gov.hk/en/background.htm
-
-
B.
1.
2.
- 2001 8
2003 9 25
-
C.
1.
http //www.edb.gov.hk/index.aspx?langno=1&nodeID=5840
- 2005
-
• 118
2.
http //www.cdf.gov.hk/english/aboutcdf/aboutcdf_int.html
-
-
10 16
75% 14
16 70%
3. ( )
http //www.swd.gov.hk/en/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_comprehens/
-
4.
http //www.swd.gov.hk/en/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_ssallowance/
(1)
65 69 (
)
(2)
70
D.
1. 3-5 1.
http //www.edb.gov.hk/index.aspx?nodeid=5792&langno=1
2007/08
(a)
(b)
24,000 48,000
(c) ;
• 119
(d) 2012/13
(e) 2. 6-14 1.
-
2.
http //www.edb.gov.hk/index.aspx?nodeid=4649&langno=1&1angno=1
- ( ) (
)
- 10%
3. 18-65 1.
http //www.sfaa.gov.hk/cef/intro.htm
80% 10,000 (
)
E.
1. 15-24 1.
http //www.yes.labour.gov.hk/en/jointapp_intro_details.htm
15 19
2.
http //www.yes.labour.gov.hk/en/jointapp_intro_details.htm
15 24
2. 24-60 1.
http //www.erb.org/Corp/home/erb_intro/en/
• 120
2.
http //www.jobs.gov.hk/eng/trial_scheme/index.aspx
3.
http //www.jobs.gov.hk/eng/rtp/index.aspx
4. ( )
( )
5.
http //www.ciif.gov.hk/en/objectives/index_e.html
( ) (
)
6.
http //www.labour.gov.hk/eng/news/content.htm
7.
http //www.had.gov.hk/en/public_services/en_self_reli/index.htm#b
3.
1.
http //www.labour.gov.hk/eng/service/protection/index.htm
2006 10 11
• 121
5
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
80
• 122
1
.
. 40
.
. ( 1)
.
/ /( )
/
1. :
? ( )
2.
3.
4. (
1)
1.
2.
15 1
5.
1
2
6.
7.
3.
10
4.
5.
25
1
• 123
.
1
(+)
(-)
2006
• 124
.
1
* 100,000 * 150,000
# #
100,000 5 % 100,000 10 %
100,000 10 % 100,000 25 %
15 % 45 %
*
# = -
( )
( )
/
120,000 20,000 1,000 119,000 99.2%
300,000 200,000 15,000 285,000 95%
1,000,000 900,000 120,000 880,000 88%
/
120,000 0 0 120,000 100%
300,000 150,000 22,500 277,500 92.5%
1,000,000 850,000 327,500 672,500 67.35%
• 125
1.
(a) ?
/
(b) ?
2.
(a) ?
(b) ?
3. ?( ?)
( ) ( )
• 126
2 (
)
* 100,000 * 100,000
# #
100,000 5 % 100,000 10 %
100,000 10 % 100,000 25 %
15 % 45 %
*
# = -
( )
( )
/
120,000 20,000 1,000 119,000 99.2%
300,000 200,000 15,000 285,000 95%
1,000,000 900,000 120,000 880,000 88%
/
120,000 20,000 2,000 118,000 98.3%
300,000 200,000 35,000 265,000 83.3%
1,000,000 900,000 350,000 650,000 65%
• 127
1.
?
/ ( )
2.
?
3. ?( ?)
( ) ( )
• 128
2
( )
.
1.
2.
. 40
.
.
1
• 129
.
( )
1. 2003
5 30%
2.
3.
4.
2007 6 16
• 130
1. 2007/08
2.
3.
4.
workfare
5.
2007 2 18
• 131
.
1
1.
2. ? ( )
2
1. 40-50%
/
2.
• 132
6
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
110-140
3 4
(i)
(ii) (iii)
• 133
1
.
1.
2.
. 50 ( )
.
.
.
/ /( )
/
1. 8 *
2. * 2
3. 20
4. 10
5. 10
• 134
.
(i)
(ii) ( )
(iii)
.
(2007 9 )
.
1. 1957 2000
300,000 2002
2.
2002
.
1. 2005 340 2006 570
2.
110,000
3. 145 ( 6,800 ) 270 (
12,600 )
1. 2007 9 14 2. 2007 9 14
• 135
A
B
C
D
• 136
2
.
1.
2.
. 40-50 ( )
.
1.
2.
.
.
/ /( )
/
1.
#
2 #
# #
/
###
2.
##
3
3. 8
4. 10
5. 12
6.
###
10
7. 5
• 137
.
?
1. 1976
2.
60-70%
3. 2002 56%
2007 10
1. 90%
2. 5% (30,000 )
3. 500 10
4.
5. 100%
6. 2004 91,000 2007 108,000
( )
7. (400-700 ) 3,200 5,900
1997 60% 120 200 (
)
8. 80% 1,800
9.
1. 2007 10 5
2. 2007 6 15 10 5
• 138
a.
b.
1
(3,000-5,000 ) (80%)
a.
b.
2
a.
b.
1. ? ?
2. ? ?
3. ? ?
4. ? ?
5. ? ?
• 139
3
.
. 10-20
.
.
.
/ /( )
/
1. 2 *
2. 2
3. 6
4. * 8
5. * 2
• 140
.
2007 10
a. 70 50
b. ( )
c.
d.
a. 45
b. 180 250
c. 15 100
( )
1. 2007-08
2. 2007 6 25
500 ( )
• 141
4( )
.
. 10-20
.
.
.
/ /( )
/
1. 2 *
2. 2
3. 6
4. * 8
5. * 2
• 142
.
1. ( ) (
)
2. (234 2,880 ) (10-18 )
( )
3.
4. 49 7,000
2007 11,000 830 20% 24% 95%
5.
www.microloanfundation.org.uk
• 143
1. ? ?
( ) ( )
2. ? ? ?
20-24% 95%
( 20-24% 95% )
( )
20-24%
3. ?
/
4. ? ?
( )
.
1. (www.microloanfundation.org.uk)
2. Can Equity and Efficiency Complement Each Other? Rebecca M. Blank (2002)( European
Association of Labour Economists Adam Smith Lecture )
• i
1.
.
.
1. ( a)
2. /
3. / (3-4 ) ( )
4. 1-1.5
/ 15 ( )
a. ( 1) 45
b. 15
c. ( 2) :15 45
d. 15
e. ( 3) :15 45
f. 15
g. ( 4) :15 45
h. 15
i. ( 1) :15
j. ( 1) :15
5. /
3-4 ( b)
6. 4
( c)
7.
• ii
16
a.
( ) ( )
A1 ( ) B1 ( ) A2 ( ) B2 ( )
( ) ( )
A3 ( ) B3 ( ) A4 ( ) B4 ( )
b.
A1+A2+A3+A4
( )
B1+B2+B3+B4
( )
c.
( ) ( )
A1 ( ) B2 ( ) A2 ( ) B1 ( )
( ) ( )
A3 ( ) B4 ( ) A4 ( ) B3 ( )
• iii
2.
.
.
1. ( )
2.
3. /
4. /
(
)
5. (2-3 x ) 1-2
6. 4-5
7. ( )
• iv
3.
.
.
1. ( )
2.
3. 1-5
4.
/
a.
b. 3
c.
5.
a. (
)
b. (A3)
c.
d. A3
6.