Post on 02-Jan-2016
Dose Audit in Fluoroscopy
Colin Martin and David Sutton
Surveys of fluoroscopy doses
Survey of barium enema doses Review of dose data Factors contributing to higher doses Optimising of technique Coronary Angiography Possible use of screening time for DRLs
Fluoroscopy procedure doses
The range in doses from fluoroscopy procedures is much larger than for radiography
Influenced by:EquipmentOperator techniquePatient factors
Collection of KAP data
Collection of KAP data for recent survey from one hospital
Distribution for 120 patient barium enema exams
Patient related factorsExtent and severity of diseaseCondition of patientPatient size
It is helpful to record patient weight, as this has a substantial influence on patient dose
Data collection
Collect data for 20-30 patients at least
The spread of data is greater for fluoroscopic procedures,
Depends on:
Patient’s condition as well as size
0perator skill and technique
Methods of data collection
Completion of paper forms by operators Advantage - details such as patient weight can
be included more readily Disadvantage - limited number of patients
Use data from computer database Advantage – information for large numbers of
patients Disadvantage – Accuracy of data entry
Method
Collect data for 20-30 patients at least
If possible choose patients with mean weight of 70 kg
Pick patients between 50 kg – 90 kg
Exclude other data, consider validity of outliers – wrong units, unusually heavy patient if no weight data
Calculate mean KAP value
Radiological technique
All radiologists and radiographers have their own techniques Some take more images, others use more
fluoroscopy Radiologists’ practices have evolved from
approaches when they were trained Techniques have been modified in different
ways in order to take account of changes in recommendations
Some general rules for improving patient protection
Only screen for short periodsKeep the image receptor close to the
patientKeep the x-ray tube at maximal
distance from patientUse higher kVp / lower dose options
where possible
Hospital SurveysDate Exam Patient
weight (kg)
Operator / Clinician
KAP (cGy cm2)
Screening time (s)
9/2/13 Barium enema 76 Dr A 1699 45
9/2/13 Barium enema 90 Dr B 1201 41
9/2/13 Barium enema 68 Dr B 890 23
9/2/13 Barium enema 85 Dr A 2394 93
9/2/13 Barium enema 70 Dr A 2109 72
Calculate mean results for 30 patients for each hospital to submit to National Registry
Collation of hospital data
Collect data for mean results for a representative collection of hospitals
Ideally all major hospitals
If not all, then a representative sample which might be 20-30 hospitals in a country
Summary of Barium Enema Data
Calculate use rounded 3rd Quartile value for DRL
3rd Quartile
Suggested DRL 1600 cGy cm2
Mean KAPs for each hospital
Local comparisons with DRL
DRL can then be used for comparisons by individual hospitals
Data collection
Analyse, review and investigate
Barium enema Investigation of intestinal tract Involves imaging intestine following
barium contrast throughAdditional images are recorded to
visualise large intestine with higher quality
Decubitus films in barium enemas Pair of images, each showing the whole of the large
intestine Taken with patient lying first on one side and then on
the other Usually one AP and one PA
Survey of Barium Enema Doses in West of Scotland – 20 hospitals
Mean KAP 15.4 Gy cm2
KAP Range 4.4 – 30.4 Gy cm2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Hospital
Mea
n D
AP
(Gy
cm2)
Mean DAP - Decubitus
Mean DAP - Undercouch tube
Mean KAP for 20-50 patients at each hospital
Use of DRLs
Investigation if mean value exceeds DRL
Highlights problems with equipment or technique (or training)
Aids Optimisation
Equipment and operator factors influencing dose
Equipment Dose performance Method of image recording
Operator / procedure factors Screening or fluoroscopy time No. of images recorded Operators in training may give higher doses More skilled operators may take on a greater
proportion of more complex investigations
Radiological technique – the data
Barium EnemasFactor Median Quartiles RangeScreening time 1.9 1.7-2.6 1.1-4.0Pulse fluoro rates 1-7.5 p/sTotal no. of images 12.2 10.5-14.1 4.1-
23.3Radiographs with
second tube 2.1 2.0-3.0 0-5.3
Large rangesLarge ranges
Survey of Barium Enema Doses in West of Scotland – 20 hospitals
Mean Fluoro KAP 10.1 Gy cm20
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Hospital
Mea
n D
AP
(Gy
cm2)
Mean DAP - Decubitus
Mean DAP - Undercouch tubeMean KAP for 20-50 patients at each hospital
DRL 25 Gy cm2
Higher doses from fluoroscopy
Optimisation of fluoroscopy component
Combination of:
Moving to lower dose rate option?
Choosing low dose mA v kV options?
Reducing fluoroscopy time?
Survey of Barium Enema Doses in West of Scotland – 20 hospitals
Mean Total KAP 25.4 Gy cm2
KAP Range 4.4 – 30.4 Gy cm2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Hospital
Mea
n D
AP
(Gy
cm2)
Mean DAP - Decubitus
Mean DAP - Undercouch tube
Mean Decubitus KAP (orange) 5.3 Gy cm2
KAP Range 1.3 – 10.5 Gy cm2
Higher Decubitus doses
Optimisation of Decubitus component
Use of faster film / screen system?
Use of alternative imaging technique?
Decubitus films in barium enemas Hospitals used either 400 speed film/screen or CR No link between CR and higher or lower doses No relationship to kV
Two hospitals used C-arm units and recorded images with image intensifier C-arm systems were two of
those with lower doses C-arm examinations quicker
as the patient does not have to be moved
Factors contributing to lower dose examinations
Digital equipment with low dose digital fluorography imaging
Incorporation of copper filters which reduce dose
Mean KAPs for barium enemas Copper filtration has a significant influence
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Hospital
Me
an
DA
P p
er
ex
am
(G
y c
m2
))
Yellow Units with copper filter
Another factor
Age of equipmentPerformance of image intensifier
Mean KAPs for barium examinations Equipment age and copper filtration are important factors
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Hospital
Me
an
DA
P p
er
ex
am
(G
y c
m2
))
Yellow Units with copper filter
Brown Units over 8 years old
Interventional Cardiology and Radiology
Complex procedures with high dosesWide variation in complexity of
proceduresOther aspects are life threatening / life
savingRadiation doses are highSkill and training of the operator is of
overriding importance
Interventional CardiologyAngiograms may include a variety of
additional procedures on varying numbers of vessels – Typical descriptors
Angiogram - Coronary Angiogram - Coronary & left ventriculogram Angiogram - Coronary & PTCA Angiogram – Coronary & stent Angiogram - Coronary & graft Angiogram - Coronary & PTCA & stent Angiogram - Radial Coronary Radio Frequency Abalation
Interventional CardiologyDoses will depend on complexity of
procedure and number of vessels investigated numbers of vessels
Coronary Angiogram DRL
Review MeansCalculate 3rd Quartile
3rd Quartile
Suggested DRL 2500 cGy cm2
Can we use screening time as a dose metric?
Correlation between KAP and screening time (7 hospitals)
Many other factors involved. Equipment – dose rates / options Numbers of images recorded
Screening time - DRL
• Dose is a much better variable to use than screening time
• However, if there is no KAP meter available it will give an indication of practice
• It can be useful
Conclusions
Collect 20 – 30 patient doses for each procedure
Restrict weight range if possible National Registry collates KAP data DRL set based on 3rd Quartile Comparison with DRL Many equipment and technique factors could
be involved in higher doses