Post on 18-Jan-2018
description
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 1
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
802.11 July 2008 Closing Plenary ReportsDate: 2008-07-17
Name Company Address Phone email Adrian Stephens Intel
Corporation +44 792 008
4900 (mobile) adrian.p.stephens@intel.com
Authors:
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 2
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Abstract
• This document is a digest of the closing reports of all 802.11 sub-groups for presentation at the July 2008 closing plenary meeting.
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 3
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
July 2008
Slide 3
WG Technical Editor’s Closing Report (July)
Date: 2008-07-16Authors:
Name Company Address Phone email Nancy Cam-Winget Cisco Systems 225 East Tasman Dr
San Jose, CA 95134 +1 408 853 0532 ncamwing@cisco.com
from slide 1 of IEEE 802.11-08/0906r0 by Nancy Cam-Winget (Cisco Systems)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 4
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
July 2008
Slide 4
Abstract
• Announcements• Draft Development Snapshots• Approximate Project Size• Editor Contacts
from slide 2 of IEEE 802.11-08/0906r0 by Nancy Cam-Winget (Cisco Systems)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 5
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
July 2008
Slide 5
Announcements
• Terry Cole will return to ANA and editor duties first week of August
• Procedure for ANA is contained in 07/0827r0.– See
http://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/public/07/11-07-0827-00-0000-assigned-number-authority-ana-mechanisms.ppt
from slide 3 of IEEE 802.11-08/0906r0 by Nancy Cam-Winget (Cisco Systems)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 6
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
July 2008
Slide 6
Editor’s Meeting• 60% attendance• Confirmed contact and reflector information
of editors• Reviewed publication status, plan and steps• Discussed lessons learned from recent
publications (e.g. TGk and TGr).
from slide 4 of IEEE 802.11-08/0906r0 by Nancy Cam-Winget (Cisco Systems)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 7
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
July 2008
Slide 7
Amendment Ordering
Amendment Number Task Group REVCOM Date802.11 Amendment 1 TGk May 2008 (actual)
802.11 Amendment 2 TGr May 2008 (actual)
802.11 Amendment 3 TGy Sept 2008 (was June 2008)
802.11 Amendment 4 TGw Sept 2009
802.11 Amendment 5 TGn June 2009 (was TBA)
802.11 Amendment 6 TGz Sept 2009
802.11 Amendment 7 TGp Dec 2009
802.11 Amendment 8 (was 9) TGv Dec 2009
802.11 Amendment 9 (was 10) TGu Mar 2010
802.11 Amendment 10 (was 8) TGs May 2010 (was Dec 2009)
802.11 Revision 802.11mb Mar 2011
802.11 Amendment 1 TGaa May 2011 (new)
802.11.2 TGT Dec 2009 (plan to withdraw)
• Data as of July 15 from 802.11 web. • See http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Reports/802.11_Timelines.htm
Amendment numbering is editorial! No need to make ballot comments on these dynamic numbers!
Amendment reordering was discussed by editors July 15 based on current timeline estimates and resulted announced herein.
from slide 5 of IEEE 802.11-08/0906r0 by Nancy Cam-Winget (Cisco Systems)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 8
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
July 2008
Draft Development Snapshot Most current doc shaded green.
TG
Published or Draft Baseline DocumentsSource MEC
Style Guide Editor
Snapshot Date802.11 k r y w n z p v u s mb aa
k 2007 13.0 Frame 7.2 4/11/07 2006 Joe Kwak 19-Marr 2007 10.0 9.0 Frame 7.1 4/11/07 2005 Bill Marshall 18-Mar y 2007 13.0 9.0 11.0 Frame 7.2 7/28/07 2007 Peter
Ecclesine15-July
w 2007 11.0 9.0 7.0 6.0 Frame 7.2 No 2007 Nancy Cam-Winget
15-July
n 2007 13.0 9.0 10.0 6.0 5.03 Frame 7.2 No 2007 Adrian Stephens
15-July
z 2007 13.0 9.0 11.0 6.0 5.0 1.1 Word No 2007 Menzo Wentink
17-July
p 2007 13.0 9.0 9.0 5.0 4.0 - 4.0 2.0 Frame 7.2 No 2007 Wayne Fisher
15-July
v 2007 13.0 9.0 10.0 6.0 4.07 - 4.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 Frame 7.2 No 2007 Emily Qi 15-July
u 2007 13.0 9.0 7.0 5.0 2.0 - - - 3.0 Frame 7.2 No 2007 Necati Canpolat
15-July
s 2007 11.0 9.0 7.0 5.0 3.03 - 3.0 - 1.0 2.01 Frame 7.2 No 2007 Tony Maida 15-July
mb
- - - - - - - - - - - - No draft yet Vacant 15-July
aa No draft yet Vacant xxT (1.01) Frame 6 No 2007 Tom
Alexander20 -Mar
Changes from last report shown in red.
from slide 6 of IEEE 802.11-08/0906r0 by Nancy Cam-Winget (Cisco Systems)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 9
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
July 2008
Slide 9
Volunteer Editor Contacts• TGk – Joe Kwak– joekwak@sbcglobal.net• TGn – Adrian Stephens – adrian.p.stephens@intel.com• TGp – Wayne Fisher – wfisher@arinc.com• TGr – Bill Marshall – wtm@research.att.com• TGs – Anthony Maida– amaida@efji.com
TGT – Tom Alexander – tom@veriwave.com• TGu – Necati Canpolat – necati.canpolat@intel.com • TGv – Emily Qi – emily.h.qi@intel.com• TGw – Nancy Cam-Winget – ncamwing@cisco.com • TGy – Peter Ecclesine – pecclesi@cisco.com• TGz – Menzo Wentink– menzow@hotmail.com• TGmb – Not yet determined• TGaa – Hang Liu – hang.liu@thomson.net
from slide 7 of IEEE 802.11-08/0906r0 by Nancy Cam-Winget (Cisco Systems)
May 2007
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 10
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
WNG Clsoing Report, JulyDate: 2008-07-18
Authors:
Name Address Company Phone Email
Tk Tan 2121 Ringwood Ave, San Jose, CA 95131
GCT Semiconductor
+1-408-434-8028 tktan@ieee.org
from slide 1 of IEEE P802.11-08/0921r0 by Tk Tan, GCT Semiconductor
May 2007
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 11
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
IEEE 802.11: Wireless Next Generation Standing
CommitteeClosing Report
Denver, ColoradoJuly 2008
Chair: TK Tan
from slide 2 of IEEE P802.11-08/0921r0 by Tk Tan, GCT Semiconductor
May 2007
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 12
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Thursday, 17 July 2008 08:00-10:00
• Presentation– Radio Transmission Technology for V2V/V2I
Applications• 11-08-0875-01-0wng-radio-transmission-technolgy-for-
v2v-v2i-applications.ppt
from slide 3 of IEEE P802.11-08/0921r0 by Tk Tan, GCT Semiconductor
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 13
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Arc SC Chairs’ Report Denver, CO, US 14-18 July ‘08
Date: 2008-07-17
Name Company Address Phone email David Bagby Calypso
Ventures, Inc. 2028 Arbor Ave. Belmont, CA 94002
+1-650-637-7741
david.bagby@ieee.org
Darwin Engwer Nortel Networks
4655 Great America Pkwy, Santa Clara CA 95054 USA
+1-408-495-2588
dengwer@nortel.com
Authors:
from slide 1 of IEEE 802.11-08/0913r0 by David Bagby, Calypso Ventures, Inc.
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 14
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Arc Topics – July 2008
• Admin– Attendance, Policies, Meeting goals etc
• Focused discussion topic: MAC internal block diagrams– Doc 08/0756 r0– Doc 08/0867 r0
from slide 2 of IEEE 802.11-08/0913r0 by David Bagby, Calypso Ventures, Inc.
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 15
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
MAC internal block diagram discussionProgress this week….
• 2007 doc
• Existing TG impacts
• SG/Future needs: – Ex: What is “Upper” and “Lower”?
Most of the time taken by discussion of 2007
functions.
Occasional forays into a TG impact. These
were noted as tasks for a later pass.
We did not get make it this far during this
session.
from slide 3 of IEEE 802.11-08/0913r0 by David Bagby, Calypso Ventures, Inc.
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 16
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Meeting Documents
• Arc Agenda 11-08-756 r0• MAC “sub blocks” 11-08-0867 r1• Arc Chair’s Report 11-08-0913 r0• Arc Minutes July 2008 11-08-0869 r0
from slide 4 of IEEE 802.11-08/0913r0 by David Bagby, Calypso Ventures, Inc.
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 17
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Arc near term goals
• Between July and Sept– Continue refinement of MAC internal components model– Conf calls
– Review capture of white board discussions this week• Aug 5, 13:00 ET, 1 hr.
– Extend work form July session• Aug 19, 13:00 ET, 1 hr.
• Conf Call details will be sent via ARC reflector
• Sept session– Status update
• Review between session progress– Continue project activity
from slide 5 of IEEE 802.11-08/0913r0 by David Bagby, Calypso Ventures, Inc.
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 18
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
TGmb Agenda and Report July 2008Date: 2008-07-18
Name Affiliations Address Phone email Jon Rosdahl CSR Highland, UT +1 801-376-6435 jrosdahl@ieee.org
Authors:
from slide 1 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 19
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Abstract
Agenda, and meeting slides for July 2008 TGmb, Plenary Session in Denver, Colorado. Start on Slide 21
Closing report presented at the Closing WG plenary starts on Slide 3.
Motions for the WG Closing Plenary start on Slide 18.
from slide 2 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 20
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
TGmb Closing Report
July 2008 Plenary SessionDenver, Colorado
from slide 3 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 21
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Goals for July
o Elect TG Officerso TGmb Chair --- TGmb Secretaryo TGmb Editor --- TGmb Comment Tracker
Process new interpretation requestsReview and process work items for
maintenance/revision of the StandardPlanning for Sept 2008 Interim session
from slide 4 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 22
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Call for Nominations
• TGmb Chair • TGmb Issues Tracker• TGmb Secretary• TGmb Editor
• No Takers – Jon Rosdahl continues as Chair Pro-temp• Thanks to Roger Durand for acting as Secretary this
week. And assisted by Dave Hunter.
from slide 5 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 23
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Post TG meeting
• Report: A volunteer has come forward to act as the Issues Tracker: Mike Montemurro
• TGm will vote on this new development at the Sept. Session.
from slide 6 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 24
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Interpretation Request #1
• Introduction:• Service Providers use Multi-SSID many ways:
– extra SSID for particular use-case, device-class, WEP...– very important for non-enterprise (hotspots, homes...)
• But…There are interop issues– Beacon timing
• Some devices cannot cope with a variable or very-short beacon interval– no problems if 50mSec apart, BUT t=SIF gives problems with some devices !
• Needs defining for multi-SSIDs– All clients need to cope with such timing– Spacing beacons by just SIFS/DIFS
• Question:• If an AP device is generating multiple BSSID signals what is the
proper spacing between those SSIDs?
from slide 7 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 25
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Interpretation Request Response #1• The IEEE 802.11-2007 only defines one MAC/PHY pair as a
STA. When a product virtualizes multiple STAs within the same physical device, the interaction of the virtual STAs are currently outside the scope of the standard, however the use of multiple BSSID/SSID functionality is currently being defined.
• The commenter (and others interested) are invited to come and participate with the 802.11 WG.
• Moved to approve the Interpretation Request Response #1: – May 2008: Moved: Stephen McCann, 2nd David Hunter -
• Passed: 5-0-0– July 2008: Affirmed – David Hunter – 2nd Jeremy deVries --
• Passed 3-0-1
from slide 8 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 26
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Interpretation Request #2
• Section 7.3.1.17 of [1] says that the Max SP Length subfield of the QoS Info field is reserved when all four U-APSD flags are set to 0. Section 7.1.1 of [1] says that reserved fields and subfields are set to 0 upon transmission and are ignored upon reception.
• If a non-AP STA sets all four U-APSD flags to 0 in the QoS Info field in the QoS Capability IE in the Association Request, and then uses an ADDTS Request to set up a delivered-enabled TS (and also sets up a trigger-enabled TS -- perhaps the same TS), how many buffered MSDUs and MMPDUs may the AP deliver to this non-AP STA during an SP triggered by this non-AP STA?
from slide 9 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 27
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Interpretation Response #2
• The standard does not specify, when the bits are set to 0, a maximum limit to how many MSDU or MMPDUs are buffered by an AP. Therefore the maximum number would be AP implementation dependent value and would be dependent on the amount of traffic buffered at the AP (See table 7-25 bit 5-6). When Bit 5 and 6 are not set to 0, then a limit is prescribed.
• Moved to accept response #2: – David Hunter; 2nd Roger Durand … – 3-0-2 passes
from slide 10 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 28
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Interpretation Request #3• An interpretation is requested on the following:• Section 7.3.2.20 of [1] says that the Minimum PHY Rate field of
the TSPEC IE is “the desired minimum PHY rate to use for this TS, in bits per second, that is required for transport of the MSDUs belonging to the TS in this TSPEC.”
• What are the exact semantics of this field?• Does this need to correspond to an operational rate of the AP
which the non-AP STA can transmit at, for a TS with an uplink component (vice-versa for a TS with a downlink component)? [*]
• If not, must it be a rate supported by the PHY being used (though perhaps not a rate supported by the non-AP STA and/or AP)?
• If not, must it be less than or equal to the highest rate supported by the PHY being used? Or the highest rate supported by the non-AP STA and AP?
• And if the answer to question marked with [*] is no, then how is K.2.2 to be used?
from slide 11 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 29
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Interpretation Request #3-- Example
• An example may help. Say we're using 802.11a, the AP supports 6, 12, 24 and 48 Mbps, and the STA supports 6, 9, 12 and 24 Mbps (here "supports" means both tx and rx). Which of the following values would be valid values in the Minimum PHY Rate field for an uplink TSPEC, and for those values, what value would be used for to compute the MPDUExchangeTime in section K.2.2 of [1]?
• 24 000 000 (supported by both STAs)• 9 000 000 (not supported by AP)• 48 000 000 (not supported by non-AP STA)• 18 000 000 (valid .a rate, but not supported by either STA)• 36 000 000 (valid .a rate, but not supported by either STA and higher than non-AP STA's
highest rate)• 27 000 000 (valid .a rate, but only in "half-clocked" operation)• 54 000 000 (highest rate on .a; not supported by either STA)• 1 111 111 111 (not a valid rate for any PHY; higher than highest rate on any PHY)• 111 111 111 (not a valid rate for any PHY; higher than highest rate on .a)• 11 111 111 (not a valid rate for any PHY, but in .a rate range)• 1 111 111 (not a valid rate for any PHY; lower than lowest rate on .a)• 111 111 (not a valid rate for any PHY; lower than lowest rate on any PHY)• 11 000 000 (not a valid .a rate, but valid .b rate and in .a rate range)• 1 000 000 (not a valid .a rate and not in .a rate range, but valid .b rate)
from slide 12 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 30
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Response for Interpretation Request #3
• In clause 7.3.2.30, the Minimum PHY Rate field definition: – The Minimum PHY Rate field is 4 octets long and contains an
unsigned integer that specifies the desired minimum PHY rate to use for this TS, in bits per second, that is required for transport of the MSDUs belonging to the TS in this TSPEC21.• Footnote 21: This rate information is intended to ensure that the
TSPEC parameter values resulting from an admission control negotiation are sufficient to provide the required throughput for the TS. In a typical implementation, a TS is admitted only if the defined traffic volume can be accommodated at the specified rate within an amount of WM occupancy time that the admissions control entity is willing to allocate to this TS.
from slide 13 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 31
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Response for Interpretation Request #3 (cont)
• The standard does not require the use any of the Operational Rates for the value of the Minimum PHY Rate.
• K2.2 is part of an Informative Annex, and is provided to assist implementers, but it does not specify required functionality.
• Move to accept the response: – Move: Roger Durand; 2nd Jeremy deVries– 3-0-1 passes
from slide 14 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 32
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
TGmb Plan of Record• May 2008 – Issue Call for Comment/Input• July 2008 – begin process input and old Interpretation requests
Acknowledge previous Task Group referrals• Sept 2008 – Start PAR Revision process• Nov 2008 – close receipt of new input• Nov 2008 – WG/EC approval of PAR Revision• Dec 2008 – NesCom/SASB approval PAR Revision• Mar/May 2009 first WG Letter ballot
– (includes All published Amendments as of Mar/May 2009)• July/Sept 2009 Recirc start• Sept 2009 – Form Sponsor Pool• Nov 2009 – Sponsor Ballot Start
– (Include all published amendments as of Nov 2009)• Mar 2010 – Sponsor Recirc• Nov 2010 – WG/EC Final Approval• Mar 2011 – RevCom/SASB Approval
from slide 15 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 33
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
CALL FOR COMMENT/INPUT
• TGmb is requesting Comment/Input on the 802.11-2007 plus approved RevCom amendments.
• Input period is from May 2008 until Nov 2008.• Presentations of proposed resolutions are expected
to be posted to IEEE Mentor server, and notification sent to the 802.11m listserv reflector.
• Notice was sent out on the 802.11 WG Reflector on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 and again on [Thursday, July 17, 2008]
from slide 16 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 34
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Output Documents for TGmb
• 11-08-0795-00-000m-Agenda and Reports– (this Document)
• 11-08-0872-03-000m-minutes July08• 11-08-917 TGmb comment template• 11-08-930-00-0000 3 responses to Interpretation Requests
July 2008
from slide 17 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 35
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Motions for TGmb
from slide 18 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 36
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Motion for TGmb
• Move that the 802.11 WG accept the responses to the Interpretations described in Doc 11-08-0930r0 as the official response from the 802.11 WG, and request approval from the EC to publish them as appropriate. – Move Jon Rosdahl; – 2nd:
from slide 19 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 37
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
End of Report
Questions?
from slide 20 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 38
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
TGmb July 2008
• Meeting slots: – Tuesday PM1– Wed AM1
• Chair Pro Tem: Jon Rosdahl, CSR
from slide 21 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 39
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Agenda• Meeting Call to Order• REVIEW IEEE/802 & 802.11 POLICIES and RULES• APPROVE OR MODIFY AGENDA (including approval of
previous minutes)• Call for Nomination –
– TGmb Chair/Editor/Secretary/Issue Tracker• Process new interpretation requests - 3 requests• Begin framework identifying amendments to include in next
revision of the standard – Filling in Issue document.• New Business • Adjourn
from slide 22 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 40
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform
All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants:
– “Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents
• “Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim,” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents or patent claims
– “Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents)
– The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group
Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2• Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged• No duty to perform a patent search
Slide #1 from slide 23 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 41
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Patent Related LinksAll participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development.Patent Policy is stated in these sources:
IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylawshttp://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manualhttp://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3
Material about the patent policy is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.html
Slide #2
If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@ieee.org or visit http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/index.html
This slide set is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt
from slide 24 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 42
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Call for Potentially Essential Patents• If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of
the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: – Either speak up now or– Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of
any and all such claims as soon as possible or– Cause an LOA to be submitted
Slide #3 from slide 25 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 43
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings• All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all
applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. – Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent
claims.
– Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions.• Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different
technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings.
– Technical considerations remain primary focus
– Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets.
– Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation.
– Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object.---------------------------------------------------------------
See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5.3.10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for
more details.
Slide #4 from slide 26 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 44
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Agenda
• Meeting Call to Order• REVIEW IEEE/802 & 802.11 POLICIES and RULES
• APPROVE OR MODIFY AGENDA – approval of previous minutes 08-622
• Moved: David Hunter; Jeremy deVries• Unanimous no objection
• Call for Nomination -- TGmb Chair/Editor/Secretary/Issue tracker• Process new interpretation requests – 3 requests• Begin framework identifying amendments to include in next revision of the standard• New Business • Adjourn
• Approved without objection
from slide 27 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 45
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Agenda
• Meeting Call to Order• REVIEW IEEE/802 & 802.11 POLICIES and RULES• APPROVE OR MODIFY AGENDA (including approval of previous minutes)
• Call for Nominations/Volunteers – – TGmb Chair/Editor/Secretary/Issues tracker
• Could hear a pin drop when asked.• Process new interpretation requests – 1 request• Begin framework identifying amendments to include in next revision of the standard• New Business • Adjourn
from slide 28 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 46
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Agenda
• Meeting Call to Order• REVIEW IEEE/802 & 802.11 POLICIES and RULES• APPROVE OR MODIFY AGENDA (including approval of previous minutes)• Call for Nomination -- TGmb Chair/Editor/Secretary
• Process new interpretation requests – 3 Requests• Begin framework identifying amendments to include in next revision of the standard• New Business • Adjourn
from slide 29 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 47
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Interpretation Request #1
• Introduction:• Service Providers use Multi-SSID many ways:
– extra SSID for particular use-case, device-class, WEP...– very important for non-enterprise (hotspots, homes...)
• But…There are interop issues– Beacon timing
• Some devices cannot cope with a variable or very-short beacon interval– no problems if 50mSec apart, BUT t=SIF gives problems with some devices !
• Needs defining for multi-SSIDs– All clients need to cope with such timing– Spacing beacons by just SIFS/DIFS
• Question:• If an AP device is generating multiple BSSID signals what is the
proper spacing between those SSIDs?
from slide 30 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 48
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Interpretation #1 history
• In May, we proposed a resolution.• Afterward, it was found that the request had not come
by normal channels. • I have talked to the SASB secretary, and now the
request is ok.• I propose that we use the response from the May
Interim
from slide 31 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 49
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Interpretation Request Response #1• The IEEE 802.11-2007 only defines one MAC/PHY
pair as a STA. When a product virtualizes multiple STAs within the same physical device, the interaction of the virtual STAs are currently outside the scope of the standard, however the use of multiple BSSID/SSID functionality is currently being defined.
• The commenter (and others interested) are invited to come and participate with the 802.11 WG.
• Moved to approve the Interpretation Request Response #1: – Moved: Stephen McCann, 2nd David Hunter - Passed: 5-0-0– From May 2008 Meeting –
• Affirmed – David Hunter – 2nd Jeremy deVries -- Passed 3-0-1
from slide 32 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 50
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Interpretation Request #2
• Section 7.3.1.17 of [1] says that the Max SP Length subfield of the QoS Info field is reserved when all four U-APSD flags are set to 0. Section 7.1.1 of [1] says that reserved fields and subfields are set to 0 upon transmission and are ignored upon reception.
• If a non-AP STA sets all four U-APSD flags to 0 in the QoS Info field in the QoS Capability IE in the Association Request, and then uses an ADDTS Request to set up a delivered-enabled TS (and also sets up a trigger-enabled TS -- perhaps the same TS), how many buffered MSDUs and MMPDUs may the AP deliver to this non-AP STA during an SP triggered by this non-AP STA?
from slide 33 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 51
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Interpretation Response #2
• The standard does not specify, when the bits are set to 0, a maximum limit to how many MSDU or MMPDUs are buffered by an AP. Therefore the maximum number would be AP implementation dependent value and would be dependent on the amount of traffic buffered at the AP (See table 7-25 bit 5-6). When Bit 5 and 6 are not set to 0, then a limit is prescribed.
• Moved to accept response #2: – David Hunter; 2nd Roger Durand … – 3-0-2 passes
from slide 34 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 52
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Interpretation Request #3• An interpretation is requested on the following:• Section 7.3.2.20 of [1] says that the Minimum PHY Rate field of
the TSPEC IE is “the desired minimum PHY rate to use for this TS, in bits per second, that is required for transport of the MSDUs belonging to the TS in this TSPEC.”
• What are the exact semantics of this field?• Does this need to correspond to an operational rate of the AP
which the non-AP STA can transmit at, for a TS with an uplink component (vice-versa for a TS with a downlink component)? [*]
• If not, must it be a rate supported by the PHY being used (though perhaps not a rate supported by the non-AP STA and/or AP)?
• If not, must it be less than or equal to the highest rate supported by the PHY being used? Or the highest rate supported by the non-AP STA and AP?
• And if the answer to question marked with [*] is no, then how is K.2.2 to be used?
from slide 35 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 53
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Interpretation Request #3-- Example
• An example may help. Say we're using 802.11a, the AP supports 6, 12, 24 and 48 Mbps, and the STA supports 6, 9, 12 and 24 Mbps (here "supports" means both tx and rx). Which of the following values would be valid values in the Minimum PHY Rate field for an uplink TSPEC, and for those values, what value would be used for to compute the MPDUExchangeTime in section K.2.2 of [1]?
• 24 000 000 (supported by both STAs)• 9 000 000 (not supported by AP)• 48 000 000 (not supported by non-AP STA)• 18 000 000 (valid .a rate, but not supported by either STA)• 36 000 000 (valid .a rate, but not supported by either STA and higher than non-AP STA's
highest rate)• 27 000 000 (valid .a rate, but only in "half-clocked" operation)• 54 000 000 (highest rate on .a; not supported by either STA)• 1 111 111 111 (not a valid rate for any PHY; higher than highest rate on any PHY)• 111 111 111 (not a valid rate for any PHY; higher than highest rate on .a)• 11 111 111 (not a valid rate for any PHY, but in .a rate range)• 1 111 111 (not a valid rate for any PHY; lower than lowest rate on .a)• 111 111 (not a valid rate for any PHY; lower than lowest rate on any PHY)• 11 000 000 (not a valid .a rate, but valid .b rate and in .a rate range)• 1 000 000 (not a valid .a rate and not in .a rate range, but valid .b rate)
from slide 36 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 54
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Response for Interpretation Request #3
• In clause 7.3.2.30, the Minimum PHY Rate field definition: – The Minimum PHY Rate field is 4 octets long and contains an
unsigned integer that specifies the desired minimum PHY rate to use for this TS, in bits per second, that is required for transport of the MSDUs belonging to the TS in this TSPEC21.• Footnote 21: This rate information is intended to ensure that the
TSPEC parameter values resulting from an admission control negotiation are sufficient to provide the required throughput for the TS. In a typical implementation, a TS is admitted only if the defined traffic volume can be accommodated at the specified rate within an amount of WM occupancy time that the admissions control entity is willing to allocate to this TS.
from slide 37 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 55
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Response for Interpretation Request #3 (cont)
• The standard does not require the use any of the Operational Rates for the value of the Minimum PHY Rate.
• K2.2 is part of an Informative Annex, and is provided to assist implementers, but it does not specify required functionality.
• Move to accept the response: – Move: Roger Durand; 2nd Jeremy deVries– 3-0-1 passes
from slide 38 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 56
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Agenda
• Meeting Call to Order• REVIEW IEEE/802 & 802.11 POLICIES and RULES• APPROVE OR MODIFY AGENDA (including approval of previous minutes)• Call for Nomination -- TGmb Chair/Editor/Secretary• Process new interpretation requests - TBD
• Begin framework identifying amendments to include in next revision of the standard
• New Business • Adjourn
from slide 39 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 57
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
TGmb Plan of Record• May 2008 – Issue Call for Comment/Input• July 2008 – begin process input and old Interpretation requests
Acknowledge previous Task Group referrals• Sept 2008 – Start PAR Revision process• Nov 2008 – close receipt of new input• Nov 2008 – WG/EC approval of PAR Revision• Dec 2008 – NesCom/SASB approval PAR Revision• Mar/May 2009 first WG Letter ballot
– (includes All published Amendments as of Mar/May 2009)• July/Sept 2009 Recirc start• Sept 2009 – Form Sponsor Pool• Nov 2009 – Sponsor Ballot Start
– (Include all published amendments as of Nov 2009)• Mar 2010 – Sponsor Recirc• Nov 2010 – WG/EC Final Approval• Mar 2011 – RevCom/SASB Approval
from slide 40 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 58
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Following Slide from Editor Reportdoc: 11-08-559r0
from slide 41 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 59
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
May 2008
Slide 59
Amendment Ordering
Amendment Number Task Group REVCOM Date802.11 Amendment 1 TGk Mar 2008 (sic)
802.11 Amendment 2 TGr June 2008
802.11 Amendment 3 TGy June 2008
802.11 Amendment 4 TGw Sept 2009 (was Mar 2009)
802.11 Amendment 5 TGn TBA (EC approve Jun 2009)
802.11 Amendment 6 (was 7) TGz Sept 2009
802.11 Amendment 7 (was 8) TGp Dec 2009
802.11 Amendment 8 (was 9) TGs Dec 2009
802.11.2 TGT Dec 2009
802.11 Amendment 9 (was 10) TGv Dec 2009
802.11 Amendment 10 (was 6) TGu Mar 2010 (was Sept 2009)
802.11 Revision 802.11mb Mar 2011
• Data as of March 30 from 802.11 web– See http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Reports/802.11_Timelines.htm
Amendment numbering is editorial! No need to make ballot comments on these dynamic numbers!
Amendment reordering was discussed by editors Mar 30 based on current timeline estimates and resulted announced herein.
from slide 42 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 60
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
May 2008
Slide 60
Amendment Ordering
Amendment Number Task Group REVCOM Date802.11 Amendment 1 TGk July 2008
802.11 Amendment 2 TGr July 2008 -- pending
802.11 Amendment 3 TGy Sept/Dec 2008 -- Pending
802.11 Amendment 4 TGw Sept 2009 (was Mar 2009)
802.11 Amendment 5 TGn TBA (EC approve Jun 2009)
802.11 Amendment 6 (was 7) TGz Sept 2009
802.11 Amendment 7 (was 8) TGp Dec 2009
802.11 Amendment 8 (was 9) TGs Dec 2009
802.11.2 TGT Disbanded
802.11 Amendment 9 (was 10) TGv Dec 2009
802.11 Amendment 10 (was 6) TGu Mar 2010 (was Sept 2009)
802.11 Revision 802.11mb Mar 2011
• Data as of July 2008 from 802.11 web– See http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Reports/802.11_Timelines.htm
Amendment numbering is editorial! No need to make ballot comments on these dynamic numbers!
Amendment reordering was discussed by editors Mar 30 based on current timeline estimates and resulted announced herein.
from slide 43 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 61
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Following Slide from TGmb March Minutesdoc: 11-08-0391r0
from slide 44 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 62
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
March Comparison of TGma timeline with proposed TGmb
March 2011March 8, 2007RevCom Approval
Nov 2010Nov 8, 2006Final EC Approval
Nov 2010Nov 8, 2006Final WG Approval
April 2010D6.0 April 10, 2006D7.0 June 21, 2006D8.0 Aug 25, 2006D9.0 Nov 7, 2006
Sponsor Recirculation
Oct 2009D5.0 Oct 21, 2005Sponsor Ballot
Aug 2009Aug 21, 2005Form Sponsor Ballot Poll
July 2009D2.0 – 7/7/2005D3.0 – 8/8/2005D4.0 – 9/9/2005
WG Recirculation
March 2009March 29, 2005WG letter ballot
3/22/2007 – 12/31/2011March 20, 2003PAR Approved/Expires
TGmb- ProposedTGma – ActualTitle
March 2011March 8, 2007RevCom Approval
Nov 2010Nov 8, 2006Final EC Approval
Nov 2010Nov 8, 2006Final WG Approval
April 2010D6.0 April 10, 2006D7.0 June 21, 2006D8.0 Aug 25, 2006D9.0 Nov 7, 2006
Sponsor Recirculation
Oct 2009D5.0 Oct 21, 2005Sponsor Ballot
Aug 2009Aug 21, 2005Form Sponsor Ballot Poll
July 2009D2.0 – 7/7/2005D3.0 – 8/8/2005D4.0 – 9/9/2005
WG Recirculation
March 2009March 29, 2005WG letter ballot
3/22/2007 – 12/31/2011March 20, 2003PAR Approved/Expires
TGmb- ProposedTGma – ActualTitle
from slide 45 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 63
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Call for Comment/Input
• Motion: Issue a Call for Comment/Input on the 802.11-2007 plus approved RevCom amendments.– Moved: Stephen McCann, 2nd Dave Hunter– Passed: 6 – 0 – 0
• Call for Input was issued on May • Resend E-mail on Wednesday July 16, 2008.
– Include comment template – TGmb :Plan of Record– Careful list of what is open for review– Move: Mike Montemurro, 2nd: David Hunter – 6-0-1
from slide 46 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 64
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Issues Doc Action items
• Identify Interpretation Responses that need to be included.
• Update Interpretation pages (802.11 and IEEE.org)• Combine E-mail list of issues to Issues Doc• Find Password for Protection on Issues Doc• Send call to TG chairs for oustanding comments
directed to TGmb• Update and post new Issues Doc… Ready for review
prior to Sept Interim meeting.
from slide 47 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 65
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Goals for Sept 2008
o Elect TG Officerso TGmb Chair --- TGmb Secretaryo TGmb Editor --- TGmb Comment Tracker
o Process new interpretation requestso Review Plan of Record and Timeline statuso Review and process work items for
maintenance/revision of the Standardo Planning for Nov 2008 plenary session
from slide 48 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 66
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
New Business
• None:• Adjourn :
– Moved by David Hunter, 2nd Mike Montemurro– Unanimous as everyone left the room
from slide 49 of IEEE 802.11-08/0795r0 by Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 67
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
+1 (321)427-4098
5488 Marvell Lane,Santa Clara, CA, 95054
Name Company Address Phone email Bruce Kraemer Marvell
bkraemer@marvell.com
Sheung Li SiBEAM
sli@sibeam.com
Adrian Stephens
Intel Corporation
15 JJ Thompson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0FD, UK
+1 (503)616-3800
adrian.p.stephens@intel.com
TGn Closing Report Denver, CO, US 802 Plenary – 14-18 July ‘08
Date: 2008-07-18Authors:
555 Mathilda Ave,Sunnyvale, CA 94085
+1 (408)245-3120
from slide 1 of IEEE 802.11-08/0830r0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 68
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
TGn Draft 5.0
The TGn Streak Continues
with
All 1112 recirculation ballot comments resolved in one meeting
from slide 2 of IEEE 802.11-08/0830r0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 69
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
TGn Motion • Having approved comment resolutions for all of the
comments received from LB129 on Draft 5.0, • And having prepared Draft 6.0 containing all of the
approved comment resolutions,• Move to begin as soon as possible, a 15 day Working
Group Recirculation Ballot asking the technical question “Should P802.11n Draft 6.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?” – TG: 35 approve, 0 not approve, 0 abstain
from slide 3 of IEEE 802.11-08/0830r0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 70
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Primary Meeting Documents
• Chair’s Opening Report 11-08-0748r5• Chair’s Closing Report11-08-0830r0• Meeting Minutes 11-08-0828r0• Editor’s Report 11-08-0792r1
from slide 4 of IEEE 802.11-08/0830r0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 71
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
TGn Teleconference Plan
Wednesday Blocking events
Ad hoc group
Meeting chair Bridge # Passcode
July 16 PlenaryJuly 23 ballot .19 Shellhammer?
July 30 ballot .19 Shellhammer?
Aug 06 ballot .19 Shellhammer?
Aug 13
Aug 20
Aug 27
Sep 03 Ad hoc
Sep 10 Interim
Call number: 916-356-2663 Call time: 11:00 – 13:00 ET
from slide 5 of IEEE 802.11-08/0830r0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 72
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
TGn Newly Approved TimelineEvent Name Accepted Dates
Actual PredictedPAR Approved Sep ‘03Initial WG Letter Ballot Mar ‘06Recirculation WG Letter Ballot
Oct ‘07
Form Sponsor Ballot Pool Jul ‘08Initial Sponsor Ballot Nov ‘08Recirculation Sponsor Ballot
Jan ‘09
Final WG Approval Jul ‘09Final EC Approval Jul ‘09RevCom/ Stds Board Approval
Sep ‘09
Publication Nov ‘09from slide 6 of IEEE 802.11-08/0830r0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 73
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Ad hoc in September 2008
Request authorization for TGn to hold an ad hoc • on Dates September 3,4,5 (Wed, Thur, Fri)• in Hawaii, US • with the venue of choice being
– the Hilton Kauai• for the purpose of resolving comments received
during LB1xx on Draft 6.0
from slide 7 of IEEE 802.11-08/0830r0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 74
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
TGp Closing ReportDate: 2008-07-17
Name Affiliations Address Phone email Lee Armstrong Employer:
Armstrong Consulting, Inc.
Affiliation: USDoT
132 Fomer Road Southampton, MA 01073 USA
+1 617 620 1701
LRA@tiac.net
Author:
from slide 1 of IEEE 802.11-08/0931r0 by Lee Armstrong (Armstrong Consulting, Inc.)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 75
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Abstract
TGp closing report for July meetings
from slide 2 of IEEE 802.11-08/0931r0 by Lee Armstrong (Armstrong Consulting, Inc.)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 76
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
May Meetings Summary
• LB125 Comment resolutions continued • 489 comments received, 257 of which are editorial • 5 time slots during the week• 101 comments finalized prior to start of meetings, 16 resolved this week.• Number of comments resolved this week not an indicator of progress
made.• Majority of potentially contentious comments related to WAVE BSS.
Most of prior ad-hoc meetings and this week spent on developing basic approach to this issue. Approach selected that will allow large number of comments to be resolved quickly.
• Weekly teleconferences planned for every Thursday @ 1500 Piscataway time
from slide 3 of IEEE 802.11-08/0931r0 by Lee Armstrong (Armstrong Consulting, Inc.)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 77
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
July 2008
Slide 77
TGs Denver Closing ReportDate: 2008-07-17
Authors:
from slide 1 of IEEE P802.11-08/909r1 by Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 78
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
July 2008
Slide 78
Abstract
Report of TGs, ESS Mesh Networking Task Group, to the July 2008 (Denver, Colorado) closing 802.11 Plenary.
TGs Motto: Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing left to add but when there is nothing left to take away.
from slide 2 of IEEE P802.11-08/909r1 by Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 79
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
July 2008
Slide 79
TGs Closing Plenary Report• Having failed LB #126, TGs is proceeding to
improve its D2.0 Draft by working on resolving the comments it has received.
• The current comment resolution spread sheet is 11-08/493r18.
• 802.11s D2.01 and D2.01 redline are in the members area of the 802.11 web site.
• TGs is holding teleconferences every other Wednesday at 10:00 for up to 1 ½ hours starting 23 July except during face-to-face meetings.
from slide 3 of IEEE P802.11-08/909r1 by Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 80
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Summary of Comment Resolution
July 2008
Slide 80
LB #126Closed Thru
JAXClosed Thru
DEN
Total 1964 100% 474 24% 783 40%
Editorial 656 33% 297 15% 450 23%
Technical 1308 67% 177 9% 333 17%
from slide 4 of IEEE P802.11-08/909r1 by Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 81
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
July 2008
Slide 81
TGs Closing Plenary Report• TGs will be holding an ad hoc (previously
approved by the WG):– 3-5 September 2008 in Līhu‘e, Kaua‘I, Hawai‘i, to
work on comment resolution.• An annotated agenda for TGs at this meeting is
available in 11-08/701r10. The draft minutes will be posted shortly as 11-08/835r0.
• Goal for the September TGs meeting in Waikoloa, Hawai‘i:– Resolve Letter Ballot comments.
from slide 5 of IEEE P802.11-08/909r1 by Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 82
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
July 2008
Slide 82
End of Report
from slide 6 of IEEE P802.11-08/909r1 by Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 83
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Closing ReportDate: 2008-07-17
Name Company Address Phone email
Stephen McCann Roke Manor Research Ltd (Roke)
Roke Manor Research Ltd Old Salisbury Lane Romsey, Hampshire
SO51 0ZN, UK
+44 1794 833341 stephen.mccann@roke.co.uk
Authors:
from slide 1 of IEEE 802.11-08/0927r0 by Stephen McCann, Roke
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 84
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Abstract
Closing report for TGu Interworking with External Networks for July 2008,
Denver, Colorado, USA
from slide 2 of IEEE 802.11-08/0927r0 by Stephen McCann, Roke
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 85
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
• Review of LB 132– Approved 76.87%– 944 comments (453 Ed, 511 Tech)– End of week 35% of technical comments discussed.
• Technical Presentations– 5 submissions to resolve LB comments
• Liaisons– Issues from 802.1af, NENA, 3GPP
from slide 3 of IEEE 802.11-08/0927r0 by Stephen McCann, Roke
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 86
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
• Ad Hoc– 3rd – 5th September 2008, Kauai, Hawaii– Comment Resolution
• Teleconferences– August 8th 2008 : 10:00 ET [Others, Editorial] 1 hr– August 12th 2008 : 10:00 ET [ES, MIH] 1 hr– August 19th 2008 : 10:00 ET [SSPN, QoS] 1 hr– August 26th 2008 : 10:00 ET [GAS] 2 hr
• Plans for September 2008– LB132 Comment Resolution & Start re-circ LB– Liaison update
from slide 4 of IEEE 802.11-08/0927r0 by Stephen McCann, Roke
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 87
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
July 2008 Closing ReportDate: 2008-07-17
Name Affiliations Address Phone email Dorothy Stanley Aruba Networks 1322 Crossman Ave
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
+1 630-363-1389
dstanley@arubanetworks.com
Authors:
from slide 1 of IEEE 802.11-08/0925r1 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 88
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Abstract
This document contains the TGv closing report for July 2008.
from slide 2 of IEEE 802.11-08/0925r1 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 89
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Goals and Accomplishments for July 2008 Meeting
• Hear Presentations – 10 presentations• Began comment resolution from LB 133
– Proposed resolutions developed– 29 comments resolutions adopted– 33 agreed but not adopted due to 4-hour rule
• Approved teleconferences and an ad-hoc meeting
from slide 3 of IEEE 802.11-08/0925r1 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 90
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Output Documents
• 11-08-0925-00-000v-TGv-July-2008-closing-report• 11-08-0700-11-000v-July-2008-agenda.ppt• 11-08-0832-00-000v-July 2008 Minutes for Task Group v
from slide 4 of IEEE 802.11-08/0925r1 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 91
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Comment Processing Summary
Total 1414Technical 785Editorial 629Editor Done/To Do 0/1414Comment resolutions adopted to date 29Comments remaining 1385
from slide 5 of IEEE 802.11-08/0925r1 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 92
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Documents for 08/801 comment resolutionCategory Volunteers Document
Annex Joe Kwak
Collocated Interference Jari Jokela, Jing Zhu
Diagnostics D. Stanley 08-901
Event Joe Kwak
FBMS A. Thomson 08-898
General D. Stanley 08-841
Multicast Diagnostics Alex Ashley
Location/Timing A. Thomson/Ganesh 08-897
Proxy ARP D. Stanley 08-866
Roaming Management Emily Qi 08-883
SleepMode Emily Qi
STA Statistics Y. Seok, G. Venkatsan
TFS Emily Qi 08-886
TIM Broadcast M. Wentink
Traffic Generation Moo-Ryong Jeong
Virtual AP D. Stanley, Qi Wang
TCLAS G. Venkatsan
Channel Usage E. Qi
Resolutions # CID # remaining
1 1
25 25
Denver 38 7 (31)
48 48
66 66
258 258
31 31
107 107
Denver 9 0 (2)
Denver 15 2
34 34
18 18
Denver 11 2
31 31
11 11
52 52
8 8
22 22
from slide 6 of IEEE 802.11-08/0925r1 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 93
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Goals for September 2008
• Letter Ballot• Presentations
from slide 7 of IEEE 802.11-08/0925r1 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 94
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Motion
Move to authorize TGv Teleconferences – August 12 at 1200– August 26 at 1300– September 2 at 1300– Eastern for 2 hours.
• Mover: Allan Thomson• Seconder: Ganesh Venkatesan• Result: 15-0-6 passes
from slide 8 of IEEE 802.11-08/0925r1 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 95
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Motion
Move to authorize a TGv Ad-hoc meeting August 18-20 in Santa Clara, hosted by Intel
• Mover: Ganesh Venkatesan• Seconder: Allan Thomson• Result: 11-0-7
from slide 9 of IEEE 802.11-08/0925r1 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 96
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
References
from slide 10 of IEEE 802.11-08/0925r1 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 97
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
IEEE 802.11 TGw July Closing ReportDate: 2008-07-18
Name Company Address Phone email Jesse Walker Intel Corporation 2111 N.E. 25th Ave,
Hillsboro, OR USA +1-503-712-1849
jesse.walker@intel.com
Authors:
from slide 1 of IEEE 802.11-08/0922r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 98
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Abstract
This presentation contains the IEEE 802.11 TGw closing report for July 2008.
from slide 2 of IEEE 802.11-08/0922r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 99
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
July Meeting Status & Objectives
• TGw Status– Sponsor Ballot Report for P802.11w awaiting approval by the
IEEE 802 LMSC Executive Committee
• July Meeting Objectives– Request authorization for ad hoc meetings
from slide 3 of IEEE 802.11-08/0922r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 100
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Accomplishments
• Approved request to authorize an ad hoc meeting September 3-5 in Lihue, Kauai, for the purpose of processing Sponsor Ballot comments received on P802.11w D6.0
from slide 4 of IEEE 802.11-08/0922r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 101
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Submissions
• 11-08-0820-01-000w-july-2008-agenda.ppt• 11-08-865-00-000w-TGw-Denver-July2008-meeting-
minutes.doc• 11-08-0922-00-000w-Closing-Report.ppt
from slide 5 of IEEE 802.11-08/0922r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 102
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Motion
• Motion: Move that P802.11w Sponsor Ballot Resolution Committee hold an ad hoc meeting in Lihue, Kauai on September 3-5, 2008
• Mover: Kapil Sood• Seconder: Henry Ptasinski• Result: 6-0-3 (motion passes)
from slide 6 of IEEE 802.11-08/0922r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 103
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
September Meeting Planning
• Objectives– Comment Resolution Sponsor Ballot for P802.11w D6.0– Plan ad hocs and teleconferences to resolve Sponsor Ballot
Comments
from slide 7 of IEEE 802.11-08/0922r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 104
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
TGz July Denver Closing ReportDate: 2008-07-17
Name Company Address Phone email Menzo Wentink Qualcomm Straatweg 66,
Breukelen, the Netherlands
+31-65-183-6231
mwentink@qualcomm.com
Authors:
from slide 1 of IEEE 802.11-08/0919r0 by Menzo Wentink, Qualcomm
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 105
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Accomplishments
• Resolved the remaining LB127 comments• Added security and power saving proposals• Approved TGz Draft 2.0 and a 30 day LB• Approved 2 teleconferences
– Tuesday August 26, September 2– Noon ET
Slide 105from slide 2 of IEEE 802.11-08/0919r0 by Menzo Wentink, Qualcomm
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 106
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Motion
• Approve a 30 day Working Group Technical Letter Ballot asking the question “Should TGz Draft 2.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?”
• Move: Alexander Safonov• Second: Michelle Gong• Result: 10y – 0n – 1a
from slide 3 of IEEE 802.11-08/0919r0 by Menzo Wentink, Qualcomm
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 107
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission Slide 107
802.11aa – Robust Audio Video Transport Streaming Jacksonville Closing Report
Date: 2008-07-17
Name Affiliation Address Phone email Ganesh Venkatesan
Intel Corporation
JF3-381, 2111NE 25th Ave, Hillsboro, OR 97124
+1 503 334 6720
ganesh.venkatesan@intel.com
Authors:
July 2008
from slide 1 of IEEE 802.11-08/0918r0 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 108
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission Slide 108
Abstract
This submission summarizes the activities of 802.11aa during the Denver (July 2008) meeting.
July 2008
from slide 2 of IEEE 802.11-08/0918r0 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 109
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission Slide 109
Closing Report
July 2008
from slide 3 of IEEE 802.11-08/0918r0 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 110
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Recognition
Many thanks to Alex Ashley (NDS) and Graham Smith (DSP Group) for volunteering to be the recording secretary in all the meetings during this session
July 2008
Slide 110from slide 4 of IEEE 802.11-08/0918r0 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 111
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission Slide 111
802.11aa Goal(s) for the Denver Meeting
1. Approvals– Approval of Jacksonville Meeting minutes (08/702r1)– Teleconference schedule
2. Joint Meeting with 802.1AVB3. Listen to Technical Proposals (14)
July 2008
from slide 5 of IEEE 802.11-08/0918r0 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 112
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Technical Presentations
Slide 112
1. 802.11 Packets and MPEG Frames – Background (08/717r1)2. OBSS Requirements (08/765r0)3. OBSS Complexity (08/864r0)4. OBSS Follow up (08/457r3 – VTS document)5. Managed Contention Access (08/818r1)6. Multicast/Broadcast Communication with Acknowledgement (08/803r0)7. Block ACK Enhancements for Multicast Transmissions (08/809r1)8. More Reliable Broadcast/Multicast (08/816r1)9. Group Block Acknowledgements for Multicast Traffic (08/766r0)10. EDCA Enhancements to Improve Link Reliability for Multicast Streams (08/810r0)11. Robust Multicast/Broadcast Protocol (08/587)12. Using Packet Drop Precedence for Graceful Degradation (08/764r0)13. Requirement and Implementation for Intraflow and Inter-AC Diffserv (08/857r0)14. VTS Frame Structure (08/802r0)
July 2008
from slide 6 of IEEE 802.11-08/0918r0 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 113
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Other Accomplishments
• Recognized the need for a Requirements Document on OBSS.
• Recognized the need for a Requirements Document on Reliable Multicast/Broadcast.
• Approved Bi-Weekly teleconferences starting July 28th, 2008 at 1100 Hrs ET for 1 hour.
• Motion to 802.1
Slide 113
July 2008
from slide 7 of IEEE 802.11-08/0918r0 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 114
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Joint Meeting with 802.1AVB• 802.1AS/802.11v need to be in sync – the goal is to
ascertain that Time Synchronization features of 802.11v that 802.1AS depends on are specified completely.
• 802.1 is ‘retiring’ the 802.1Q C-tag CFI bit by the end of 2008. Opportunity for 802.11 to request that bit be re-used to indicate ‘Drop Precedence Priority’ on C-tags.
• Plan 4-hour joint meeting in the November Plenary – 802.1AVB requests a comprehensive tutorial on 802.11e (specifically management interface)
Slide 114
July 2008
from slide 8 of IEEE 802.11-08/0918r0 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 115
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Plans for Waikoloa Meeting• Complete and adopt OBSS, Multicast/Broadcast
Requirements • Continue with Technical proposals
Slide 115
July 2008
from slide 9 of IEEE 802.11-08/0918r0 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 116
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
VHT SG July 2008 Closing ReportDate: 2008-07-17
Name Company Address Phone email Eldad Perahia Intel
Corporation 2111 NE 25th Ave Hillsboro, OR 97124
503-712-8081 eldad.perahia@intel.com
Authors:
from slide 1 of IEEE 802.11-08/0920r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 117
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Abstract
This document is the closing report for the Very High Throughput Study Group for the July 2008 plenary session.
from slide 2 of IEEE 802.11-08/0920r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 118
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Work Completed• Reviewed initial PAR feedback and prepared responses
– From individuals, 08/812r0, 08/855r0– From 802.15.3c, 08/724r2
• Reviewed Tutorials– 60 GHz Tutorial, Eldad Perahia, 08/814r1– <6 GHz Tutorial, Marc De Courville, 08/825r0
• Joint meeting with 802.15 regarding 60 GHz• Reviewed official PAR feedback and prepared responses, 08/880r1• Based on feedback, updated PAR & 5C’s
– 60 GHz: 08/806r3– <6 GHz: 08/807r3
• Reviewed EC report, 08/813r1• Presentations
– Backward Compatible or Not?, Junghoon Jee, 08/790r0– Channel Modeling for 60 GHz WLAN Systems, Alexander Maltsev, 08/0811r1– Some Ambiguities about Throughput Conditions in PAR, 08/821r3, Minho Cheong
• Approved PAR & feedback response motion in mid-week plenary
from slide 3 of IEEE 802.11-08/0920r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 119
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
SG Extension Motion
• Request the IEEE 802 LMSC to extend the 802.11 Very High Throughput Study Group.– Move: Darwin Engwer– Second: Dick Roy– Vote Y: 55, N: 0, Abs: 0
from slide 4 of IEEE 802.11-08/0920r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 120
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Goals for September
• Officer elections (will occur in WG)• If necessary,
– Update PAR’s & 5C’s based on feedback from EC or NesCom– Complete work on PAR & 5 C’s and re-submit motion to WG
• At least first session as VHT joint meeting• If possible split into VHT60 and VHTL6 and begin
Task Group work• Topics
– TG process– Technical contributions
from slide 5 of IEEE 802.11-08/0920r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 121
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Conference call times
• Continue conference call times:– Weekly on Thursday’s, 11:00 Eastern Time– two hour
• Topics:– TG process
from slide 6 of IEEE 802.11-08/0920r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 122
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
IMT-Advanced Closing ReportDate: 2008-07-17
Authors:
Name Company Address Phone email Bruce Kraemer Marvell 5488 Marvell Ln
Santa Clara, CA 95054
+1-321-427-4098
bkraemer@marvell.com
Darwin Engwer Nortel Networks
4655 Great America Pkwy, Santa Clara CA 95054
+1-408-495-2588
dengwer@nortel.com
from slide 1 of IEEE 802.11-08/0932r0 by Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 123
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
One Page Summary• Meeting Report 11-08-752r2
• Most of Circular letter components completed in Dubai– IMT.TECH contents/numbers finalized– IMT.EVAL contents/numbers finalized– Circular letter structure finalized
• Work to perform final cleanup and formatting will continue in correspondence
• Circular letter contents to be completed in WP5D Seoul, Korea October 8-15– Technology Templates
• Also Workshop Tuesday October 7
from slide 2 of IEEE 802.11-08/0932r0 by Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 124
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Conclusion
• Pursue the following topic:• How quickly/best can we determine complementary fit with 16m
and seriously consider an SRIT submission?• Explore possibility of joint 11/16 teleconference discussion. • Obtain/review 16m evaluation of IMT.TECH fit. • Explore how to achieve handoff (for example use of .21
mechanisms)? • Establish timing of decision/engineering input – deadline?• Establish Teleconferences to discuss topic prior to September• Include IMTA discussion topic in September 802.11 schedule
from slide 3 of IEEE 802.11-08/0932r0 by Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 125
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
IEEE 802.11 JTC1 Ad Hoc Closing ReportDate: 2008-07-18
Name Company Address Phone email Jesse Walker Intel Corporation 2111 N.E. 25th Ave,
Hillsboro, OR USA +1-503-712-1849
jesse.walker@intel.com
Authors:
from slide 1 of IEEE 802.11-08/0923r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 126
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Abstract
This presentation contains the IEEE 802.11 JTC1 Ad Hoc closing for July 2008.
from slide 2 of IEEE 802.11-08/0923r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 127
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
July Meeting Objectives
• Finalize IEEE 802.11 Working Group position paper on a WAPI engagement
from slide 3 of IEEE 802.11-08/0923r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 128
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Accomplishments
• Updated invitation letter 11-08-0664-02-invitation-to-participate.doc
• Drafted position paper 11-08-0858-01-xia-meeting-presentation.ppt
• Passed motion authorizing Jesse Walker to attend Xi’an meeting on behalf of IEEE 802.11 WG
from slide 4 of IEEE 802.11-08/0923r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 129
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Output Documents
• 11-08-0826-01-0jtc-july-2008-agenda.ppt• 11-08-0664-02-0jtc-invitation-to-participate.doc• 11-08-0858-01-0jtc-xian-meeting-presentation.ppt• 11-08-0659-00-0jtc-july-meeting-minutes.doc• 11-08-0923-00-0jtc-july-closing-report.ppt
from slide 5 of IEEE 802.11-08/0923r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 130
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
Motion
• Move to request the WG to authorize Jesse Walker to attend, on behalf of the IEEE 802.11 WG, the July JTC1/SC6/WG1 special meeting to discuss the integration of WAPI technology into international standards. Jesse Walker is not authorized to enter into any agreements on behalf of the WG.
• Moved by: Andrew Myles• Second: Don Eastlake• For: 8 Against: 0 Abstain: 0
from slide 6 of IEEE 802.11-08/0923r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation
July 2008
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 131
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0928r1
Submission
September Meeting Objectives
• Review outcome of Xi’an meeting• If meeting has positive outcome, charter SG to draft
PAR and 5 Criteria for an amendment incorporating WAPI technology elements falling within scope of 802.11
• If meeting does not reach a positive outcome, identify and explore next steps
from slide 7 of IEEE 802.11-08/0923r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation