Developments in Preclinical Tools to Predict IVIVC...Developments in Preclinical Tools to Predict...

Post on 07-Aug-2020

1 views 0 download

Transcript of Developments in Preclinical Tools to Predict IVIVC...Developments in Preclinical Tools to Predict...

Developments in Preclinical Tools

to Predict IVIVC

©2016 Absorption Systems

PRECLINICAL TESTING FOR DRUGS, BIOLOGICS AND MEDICAL DEVICES

Karen Doucette

January 26, 2016

Absorption 101

Release Rate Permeability Solubility

Dissolution Absorption

Formulated

Drug

Solubilized

Drug

Factors

Drug in

Enterocyte

Solubility

Determinants

Limits to Oral Drug Absorption

Aqueous Solubility

Intestinal Permeability

Gastric Dissolution Gastric emptying

Luminal contents

pH range

GI transit time

Absorptive Flux

= Cint • Pwall

Absorptive Flux (J)

Amidon.G et. al. A Theoretical Basis for a Biopharmaceutics Drug Classification:

The Correlation of in Vitro Drug Product Dissolution and in Vivo Bioavailability, Pharm Res (12) No. 3, 1995.

Pwall = effective or BCS

permeability

Cint = concentration in

lumen

IDAS1 Applications

Fed vs fasted

Product development

Comparison of formulations to be manufactured/tested

in vivo

Equivalence

BCS Classification

Class II

Class I

Class IV

Class III

High Solubility Low Perm

eab

ilit

y L

ow

H

igh

Dissolution-Permeability Relationship: Class I

Dissolution-Permeability Relationship: Class II

Dissolution-Permeability Relationship: Class III

Dissolution-Permeability Relationship: Class IV

IDAS2 Applications

Fed vs fasted

Product development

Comparison of formulations to be manufactured/tested

in vivo

Equivalence

Screening solid dosage forms for in vivo testing

Comparison with innovator product

Dissolution-Permeability Data

Benefits of Caco-2

Caco-2 cells express the most common intestinal efflux and uptake transporters

DM β-actin P-gp BCRP MRP2 1B1 1B3 2B1 MRP1 DM

Intestinal Enterocytes C2BBe1 Monolayer

Correlation: Caco-2 Papp vs. Human Fabs

Extension to BCS III

High solubility, low

permeability

Very rapid dissolution (>

85% in 15 min)

Qualitatively the same and

quantitatively very similar

(SUPAC level 1 or 2)

Rat In Situ Intestinal Perfusion

Syringe

Pump

Active Uptake

Peff

(x 10-4 cm/s) Fabs

Rat Human

Antipyrine 1.3 100%

Minoxidil 0.35 100%

Pregabalin 0.27 90%

Metoprolol 0.15 90%

Atenolol -0.44 50%

Excised Tissue Permeability

Formulation Evaluation

Test Compound Atenolol Antipyrine

Control 2.82 9.05 23.57

EGTA 4.78 15.15 28.07

C10 4.65 17.59 25.09

Known tight junction modifiers EGTA and C10

resulted in an increase in test compound and

atenolol paracellular permeability.

EGTA and C10 did not affect antipyrine as it exhibits

transcellular permeation

Variability – Representative Tools

Excised Tissue Perfusion Caco-2

Mean STD CV Mean STD CV Mean STD CV

Atenolol 1.65E-6 1.04E-6

57%

7.33E-6 5.22E-6

49%

2.25E-7 1.39E-7

31% Antipyrine 5.59E-6 3.96E-6 9.54E-6 4.47E-6 6.25E-5 1.54E-5

Metoprolol 3.04E-6 1.11E-6 1.50E-6 7.20E-6 2.79E-5 2.51E-6

Components of Bioavailability

Bioavailability

Absorption

fabs

First Pass

fG • fH

Permeability Solubility

Metabolism

Hepatic Intestinal

Issue-Based ADME: Ported Models

Determine the barriers to bioavailability using surgically modified

rats or dogs

Portal Vein Systemic

Oral

Duodenum

Colon

Bile Duct

Duodenum

Bile Duct

Portal Vein

Colon

Chemical Stability

Protein

Binding Metabolism

— CYPs

— UGTs

Biliary Excretion

— P-gp

— MRP2

— BCRP

Solubility

Dissolution

Permeability

Metabolism

Transporters

Barriers to Bioavailability - Rat

Route of Administration Sampling Site Result

IV JVC

IPV JVC fH

PO or ID JVC fabs · fG · fH

IPV vs PO JVC fabs · fG

Barriers to Bioavailability - Dog

Route of Administration Sampling Site Result

ID vs IV CV fabs · fG · fH

ID vs IPV CV fabs · fG

IPV vs IV CV fH (Method 1)

ID PV vs CV fH (Method 2)

Dose-normalized AUCs for different dosing and

sampling regimens

Barriers to Bioavailability - Dog

Method 1:

IPV dose + CV sampling

vs. IV dose + CV sampling

Fh

Barriers to Bioavailability - Dog

Method 1:

IPV dose vs IV dose

with CV sampling

Method 2:

ID dose with CV sampling vs.

PV sampling

Multi-Platform Approach

Caco-2 Cell Monolayers

Excised Tissue Permeability

Intestinal Perfusion

Ported Animal Models

Building Weight of Evidence

Product Performance Testing

IV-IVC

In Vivo

Ex Vivo In Vitro

28

Thank you!

For more information, please email us:

contact@absorption.com