Developing standards of professional activity with Semantic MediaWiki

Post on 28-May-2015

485 views 2 download

Tags:

description

Standard is a document to describe the professional. I'm talking how the standards can be written by the community of the professioals using Semantic MediaWiki-based tool. The talk have been presented at SMWCon Fall 2013

Transcript of Developing standards of professional activity with Semantic MediaWiki

SMW for professional standards

Yury Katkov

2

Outline

• What is the professional standard?• Create professional standards today: who and

how• Our solution– Implementing the structure of standard in SMW– Tools for proposing and evaluating versions of

standard parts– Generating the final document

• Pilot

3

What’s the professional standard?

• The standard describes the professional: – What he should do at job– What he should know about the world– What skills should he have– What personal qualities are required for his job

• Standards are used for:– Designing the programs in universities– Designing the requirements for job candidates in

companites

4

What’s the professional standard?

• The standard describes the professional: – What he should do at job– What he should know about the world– What skills should he have– What personal qualities are required for his job

• Standards are used for:– Designing the programs in universities– Designing the requirements for job candidates in

companites

YUMMY!

Example: Demon Hunter

Levels of The professional

RESPONSIbilities

Searching for Demons

Beating the

hell out of demons

Skills

Crossbow mastery

Longbow mastery

Exorcism

SPELLS

UNLOCKING DOORS

KNOWLEDGE

Basic Demonogy

Demon Anatomy

UNDERSTANDING

of the ancient runes

Professionally important qualities

Strength

DExterity

Intelligence

VItality

Leadership and managerial Qualities

Cold Blood and self possesion

25

How we structure all that

• Standard consists of many working functions• Working function consists of: – Responsibility of the worker: type of task to perform– Skills that the worker need to perform the task– Knowledge needed for the task– Professional qualities needed for the task

• Working functions are grouped by:– Categories– Qualification levels

26

How we structure all that

• Standard consists of many working functions• Working function consists of: – Responsibility of the worker: type of task to perform– Skills that the worker need to perform the task– Knowledge needed for the task– Professional qualities needed for the task

• Working functions are grouped by:– Categories– Qualification levels

27

28

How we structure all that

• Standard consists of many working functions• Working function consists of: – Responsibility of the worker: type of task to perform– Skills that the worker need to perform the task– Knowledge needed for the task– Professional qualities needed for the task

• Working functions are grouped by:– Categories– Qualification levels

29

30

Working on the standard: actors

• Fathers of the standard– Small group– Describes the levels, categories– Make decisions about which working functions

will be included to the standard• Industry representatives• Moderators/Facilitators

31

Working on the standard: process

Describing levels

Describing categories

Creating working

functions

Voting for working

functions

Syncronizing the levels

Proposing the new

version of the standard

32

Implementation in SMWMartix of the standard

33

Implementation in SMWMartix of the standard

Implemented with templates!

34

Implementation in SMWMartix of the standard

Implemented with templates!

{{{#if{{{{[[ | ]]

| [[|]] |}}}}}}}

{{{{({{[[#ifeq{[[ | ]] | [[|))]] |}}}}}})}

{{{{{(#switch{{[[

| ]] | [[|]]

|}})#ask}}(}||}}

35

Implementation in SMWMartix of the standard

36

Implementation in SMWMartix of the standard

37

38

39

Voting

• People can vote for or against the working functions

• For now – only the simplest algorithm for average vote

• Super users can freeze the voting or fix any result

• All the results are semantified

40

Voting

41

Voting

• People can vote for or against the working functions

• For now – only the simplest algorithm for average vote

• Super users can freeze the voting or fix any result

• All the results are semantified

42

Voting

43

Why not prefer The Wiki Way?

• People are hesitant to make changes in each other’s content

• Edit wars are hard to understand• Most of the edits change the meaning of the

content• People are busy and prefer voting to writing

44

Evaluting the articles

• Participant can evaluate the working functions by several criteria

• First we’ve used ArticleFeedback extension• Now we’re using our own extension:– Any number of evaluation criteria– Different criteria for different categories– Various widgets for submitting the evaluation

45

Evaluting the articles

• Participant can evaluate the working functions by several criteria

• First we’ve used ArticleFeedback extension• Now we’re using our own extension:– Any number of evaluation criteria– Different criteria for different categories– Various widgets for submitting the evaluation

46

Evaluting the articles

47

Evaluting the articles

• Participant can evaluate the working functions by several criteria

• First we’ve used ArticleFeedback extension• Now we’re using our own extension:– Any number of evaluation criteria– Different criteria for different categories– Various widgets for submitting the evaluation

48

Evaluting the articles

49

Export to MS Word

• Component for export the standard to Word– To show the results to the government

• Extensively uses SMW queries in the code• Generating MS Word is still a horrible task– Hack: create your document template in MS

Word, convert it to html, fill it and rename it to doc

50

Export to MS Word

51

Export to MS Word

• Component for export the standard to Word– To show the results to the government

• Extensively uses SMW queries in the code• Generating MS Word is still a horrible task– Hack: create your document template in MS

Word, convert it to html, fill it and rename it to doc

52

Results and perspectives

• Pilot: standard for the manager is partly accepted by the government

• SMW was good for quickly prototyping the system

• We’ll continue to use SMW as the platform for designing the standards: – Creating reusable libraby of skills and

responcibilities– Define relationships between standards

53

Some other stuff we have

• More projects on strategic foresight and future studies

• Storytelling in wiki!• Some new result formats:– Chap-timeline– Xtags

• More of Semantic Glossary• New input tools:– Hierarchies– Preview input

Тел.: 8 (499) 506 74 31Эл. почта: q@wikivote.ru

Сайт: wikivote.ru